Gradient Layer Issue

Mac OS X 10.5.8; PSE 6.0
I would like to create a layer that contains a gradient that shades from a color to transparent (not white).  I can't see any way to do this since the gradient tool/color selector doesn't offer "none" as a color selection.  Reducing the transparency of the layer doesn't work either because the entire layer is affected equally.
The effect I want to achieve is to gradually darken an underlying, background layer containing an image from right to left so that the left side of the image is unaffected and the right appears darker.  How can I achieve this?
TIA,
Beth

Hi,
You specify a transparency in a gradient using the Gradient Editor. Assuming you are using the gradient tool, look in the options bar for the window that displays the currently selected gradient. Double click this window. The gradient editor dialog will come up. If it's just color to transparent, you might consider using the foreground color to transparent preset. You can click the color stop; then the black color swatch to change the color if desired. You can also build your own custom gradient. Opacity stops are the top pencil like arrows...fill in % box to specify opacity for that stop. Here's a tutorial on using the Gradient Editor.
http://www.photokaboom.com/photography/learn/Photoshop_Elements/gradients/4_gradients_edit _a_gradient.htm
Adobe help page for E8:
http://help.adobe.com/en_US/PhotoshopElements/8.0/Win/Using/WS988A5BE3-B794-42c5-8A1D-0F3E 8F93C8E1_WIN.html
You can also get this same dialog using the gradient fill adjustment layer and gradient map adjustment layer...same with these items when selected from the menu bar.

Similar Messages

  • Color swatch ONLY shows gray shades on gradient layer...?

    My color swatch seems to be defaulting to only shades of gray on a gradient layer, and I simply cannot figure out how to get it to change to the color I have selected.  After I create a new gradient fill layer, when I have the layer selected in the list of layers on the right side of the screen, the color swatches show ONLY gray.  If I click on the swatch, it brings up the color picker, but no matter what color I select, the swatch shows shades of gray.  If I select the background layer, it goes back to showing my color.
    There is probably a simple explanation to this problem but I have been searching Google for literally hours without finding an answer.  Other similar questions I have found have the response of "Go to Image, Mode, and make sure RGB is selected."  Mine is already set to RGB, so that's not the issue.
    How do I change the colors of a gradient fill layer, and why does my color swatch show only gray shades when I have the gradient fill layer selected, even though clicking the swatch brings up the color picker?

    To change/edit the gradient color(s), double click on the Gradient Fill thumbnail in the layers panel
    Then in the Gradient Fill dialog, click just to the right of the word gradient to edit the colors
    In the gradient editor, click on one of the color stops at the bottom of the gradient bar and click on Color to change the color of that stop
    There is a lot more to the gradient editor than room to explain on the forum, so you might check out the following to learn more
    Photoshop Elements Help | Gradients
    Photoshop Help | Gradients
    The reason your color keeps showing as grayscale, is the layer mask is always active with adjustments layers in photoshop elements and layer masks are grayscale
    Photoshop Elements Help | Layer masks

  • Problem with Gradient Layer and second layer with opaque object

    I opened a new document with a white background. I then used the gradient tool under the paint bucket to make a blue sky fading to white. I then created a second layer to put a sun in with diffuse edges, so as to not have just a round yellow ball. Problem is, the yellow sun comes out fine on its' transparent layer, but when I turn on the gradient layer, it gets a blue tinge from the sky and is really only half visible. An example is below. Please help. Thanks in advance.

    I'd guess, without seeing your layers palette, that your sun image is partially transparent and as such some of the blue sky is mixing with it, yielding the green color you see.
    It really boils down to what you want it to look like.  If you're shooting for more or less a "child's" style drawing of a big yellow ball, make the brush you draw the sun with have a harder edge, and paint it in so that the central pixels are opaque.  Make sure the sun's above other layers that could influence the result.
    It might be good if you screen grabbed your layers palette and posted it.
    -Noel

  • How to change the angle of a gradient layer without changing anything else?

    How to change the angle of a gradient layer without changing anything else?
    When I try it myself my whole gradient turns black.

    To add to the above, you can not just set the angle. If you want to use other existing settings you need to get them from the layer. The code in that other thread shows one way to get them.
    But if you do not need the existing values for any other reason you can get the descriptor for the layer, make a duplicate of it with all the settings and just overwrite the ones you want to change.
    This is one way to just change the angle while keeping the other existing settings.
    // helper function for working with descriptors
    function getProperty( psClass, psKey, index ){// integer:Class, integer:key
        var ref = new ActionReference();
        if( psKey != undefined ) ref.putProperty( charIDToTypeID( "Prpr" ), psKey );
        if(index != undefined ){
            ref.putIndex( psClass, index );
        }else{
            ref.putEnumerated( psClass , charIDToTypeID( "Ordn" ), charIDToTypeID( "Trgt" ) );
        try{
            var desc = executeActionGet(ref);
        }catch(e){ return; }// return on error
        if(desc.count == 0) return;// return undefined if property doesn't exists
        var dataType = desc.getType(psKey);
        switch(dataType){// not all types supported - returns undefined if not supported
            case DescValueType.INTEGERTYPE:
                return desc.getInteger(psKey);
                break;
            case DescValueType.ALIASTYPE:
                return desc.getPath(psKey);
                break;
            case DescValueType.BOOLEANTYPE:
                return desc.getBoolean(psKey);
                break;
            case DescValueType.BOOLEANTYPE:
                return desc.getBoolean(psKey);
                break;
            case DescValueType.UNITDOUBLE:
                return desc.getUnitDoubleValue(psKey);
                break;
            case DescValueType.STRINGTYPE:
                return desc.getString(psKey);
                break;
            case  DescValueType.OBJECTTYPE:
                return desc.getObjectValue(psKey);
                break;
            case  DescValueType.LISTTYPE:
                return desc.getList(psKey);
                break;
            case  DescValueType.ENUMERATEDTYPE:
                return desc.getEnumerationValue(psKey);
                break;
    function duplicateDescriptor( descriptor ) {
        var newDescriptor = new ActionDescriptor;
        newDescriptor.fromStream( descriptor.toStream() );
        return newDescriptor;
    function localizeDescriptor( desc ) {
        var stream, pointer, zStringLength, zstring, localized_string, newZStringLength, previousStream, followingStream, newDesc;
        stream = desc.toStream();
        while( true ) {
            pointer = stream.search(/TEXT....\x00\$\x00\$\x00\$/);
            if( pointer === -1 ) {
                break;
            zStringLength = getLongFromStream( stream, pointer + 4 );
            zstring = readUnicode( stream.substr( pointer + 8, ( zStringLength - 1 ) * 2) );
            localized_string = ( localize( zstring ) ) + '\u0000';
            newZStringLength = localized_string.length;
            previousStream = stream.slice( 0, pointer);
            followingStream = stream.slice( pointer + 8 + zStringLength * 2);
            stream = previousStream.concat( 'TEXT', longToString( newZStringLength ), bytesToUnicode( localized_string ), followingStream );
        newDesc = new ActionDescriptor();
        newDesc.fromStream( stream );
        return newDesc;
    function getShortFromStream( stream, pointer ) {
        var hi, low;
        hi = stream.charCodeAt( pointer ) << 8 ;
        low = stream.charCodeAt( pointer + 1 );
        return hi + low;
    function getLongFromStream( stream, pointer ) {
        var hi, low;
        hi = getShortFromStream( stream, pointer) << 16;
        low = getShortFromStream( stream, pointer + 2);
        return hi + low;
    function readUnicode( unicode ) {
        var string = "";
        for( i = pointer = 0; pointer < unicode.length; i = pointer += 2) {
            string +=String.fromCharCode( getShortFromStream( unicode, pointer ) );
        return string;
    function longToString( longInteger ) {
        var string;
        string = String.fromCharCode( longInteger >>> 24 );
        string += String.fromCharCode( longInteger << 8 >>> 24 );
        string += String.fromCharCode( longInteger << 16 >>> 24 );
        string += String.fromCharCode( longInteger << 24 >>> 24 );
        return string;
    function bytesToUnicode( bytes ) {
        var unicode = "", char_code, charIndex;
        for( charIndex  = 0; charIndex < bytes.length; charIndex ++ ) {
            char_code = bytes.charCodeAt( charIndex );
            unicode += String.fromCharCode(char_code >> 8 ) +  String.fromCharCode( char_code & 0xff );
        return unicode;
    function setGradientAdjustmentAngle( angle ) {
        var adjustmentDesc = getProperty( charIDToTypeID("Lyr "), charIDToTypeID( 'Adjs' ) ).getObjectValue(0);
        var newAdjustmentDesc = duplicateDescriptor( adjustmentDesc );
        newAdjustmentDesc.putUnitDouble( charIDToTypeID('Angl'), charIDToTypeID('#Ang'), angle );
        var desc = new ActionDescriptor();
            var ref = new ActionReference();
            ref.putEnumerated( stringIDToTypeID('contentLayer'), charIDToTypeID('Ordn'), charIDToTypeID('Trgt') );
        desc.putReference( charIDToTypeID('null'), ref );
        desc.putObject( charIDToTypeID('T   '), stringIDToTypeID('gradientLayer'), newAdjustmentDesc);
        executeAction( charIDToTypeID('setd'), desc, DialogModes.NO );
    var newAngle = 45;
    setGradientAdjustmentAngle( newAngle );

  • Gradient-Layer with Creative Suite SDK

    Hi,
    i wanna create a gradient-layer with the Creative Suite SDK for AS3. Does anybody have a hint for me, to master this task?

    Have a look at the documentation for the Photoshop Script Listener.
    You'll need to install the script listener, restart Photoshop, create your gradient layer, then convert the script listener output (which is extendscript) to ActionScript.
    Regards

  • Why doesn't masking with gradient layer work when regular gradient does?

    If I make a regular gradient over a layer, and make it's opacity 0, and have it on 'shallow knockout', it will knockout the layer below along the 'lines' of the gradient.
    However, when I make a gradient layer to do the same, and set opacity down to zero, it doesn't seem to work.  Why?

    If I was a more advanced artist, then I might know better when I can merge things and not, but right now, I'm a wanna be artist coming from an engineering background, where when I can't grok a whole picture, I break it down in to parts and combine them.
    Like when then hand didn't look right or I needed fingers to be relocated, I brok apart the hand and fingers so could relocate them
    separately then reshade them after they were in place.
    Another set of things i've kept separate (are about 50-80 'hair strands'  most of which have a unique color, then have a another
    layer for texturing -- painting the texture onto the color made it impossible to change the look of the texture when it was wrong -- and I've changed it several times, because it didn't look right or came up with a better process/way of doing it.  Then there's usually an effect layer on top of that to apply shadowing to the strand, give it a bit of 3-dimensionality, and sometimes multiple or add or something with the layers below for emphasis.
    On change I made -- which helped, I started with all 3 layers in a group.  and 'N' groups... (still have manny like that.. but a new section I started putting base strands in 1, group , then a copy of those layers, blanked and then painted with texture (that's usually brushed on )..., And it seem the only way to apply an effect to one set or the other (or both) is to convert them to smart objects, which still allows editing (but, unfortunately, also stores them in the same file)...
    My eye's, have grown.. ll starting out in a few things, then they got more complex... as I didn't know how to really make an eye look good, so I started w/parts...and ended up with 15 layers/eye (not counting groups... things likke eyebase white, irsibase base, iris color, (base is back to pupil layer somewhere above can punch through to a black layer -- at one point (but backed off that approach, even tried to put some nerves and veins on the iris base...)..... then there's the circles of fibers that make up the iris pattern, various
    tints for various fluids and transparent structures, .. YIEKS...
    Not making any claims about this being a best or even good way, but when you are learning, and especially whern you come from
    an engineering background where you are usd to building thigns up out of parts, .. you don't want to weld your parts together before you are at the final product...and even then, ..... what if you want to make a change?!...
    Again, newbie-problem more than likely...with too much software engineering background...
    Adobe should really have doing part-time work doing product usability/abusability/stability evals... I've pressed it over the limites more than once, and had to redo the way I do things to stay with in its relavtively easy (for me) to hit limits...
    Like the one I posted about the layers slowing things down... trivial to rproduce...yet sounds like Adobe never heard of it.
    Another parallel problem I ran into/noticed the other day -- when I MOVED, 90% of the layers (somehow they got out of alignment with 10% that were still in the origninal... could be related to a move/cancel bug I run into too often as well, which, fortunately, has a not too difficult workaround).  But I moved 90% of those layers, and it only used 2 cpu's out of 6 (and no GPU usage).... took about 45 -60 seconds .. it was a *simple* +/- xy, (no rotations).. so it was something that could have been done in parallel, easily and wouldn't have been compute bound...
    The other bug I've run into WAAY too often, is when trying to move an object, if I don't caefully try to nudge it with rotate, or move a
    side, 1st, but instead, just put my pen in the middle of the object, to try to drag it -- it almost ALL the time, selects some base layer and moves some large percentage of the layers -- in a visually corrupting way... since when you hit escape to break out of the 'free movement)., the parts don't go back to where they belong and stay offset and random places...
    But it's a visual problem only...I think (not sure how my 90% got moved),  -- if you SAVE the file, then make a slight change, and then revert to the just saved copy, it cleans all up.  so it's just the display that's messed up.
    Anyway, slowly over time, all the layers that I originally had a paint or gradient layers surrounded with a vector, I slowly (interspersed with other stuff) converting them to fill/gradient layers which take up comparatively no space.  Really speeds up manipulation of those
    objects as well...
    But it's slowgoing and the interface for creating a gradient to match an existing one is very awkward to use...It's too bad when you
    create a gradient or paint layer to BEGIN with, that it's not automatically created as a vector  Then, when you start to paint on it,
    it creates a layers sized to your painting applied on top of the existing fill layer...would save all the space take by the pixels that were formula driven...   Would be so much more powerful -- only storing as bits the things you need to store as bits, rather than defaulting
    to 'bits' for everything (which really consumes resources!)...
    Personally, Another feature but this might be specialty, or not..... but as I designed my things with parts, it would be nice to be
    able to specify XY coordinate tie points between layers -- so if I moved a layer shaped like a stick, attached to another stick,
    by 1 point at each end, changing the angle of the first would change the angle of the 2nd like a 'joint' -- not like a solid rod.... that
    would be VERY cool!..but not holding my breath on that.
    Just getting the current features to work would be nice...like the gradient masking layer... no reason that shouldn't work, but there ya go. 
    Maybe you know this one (unrelated...)... But I've more than once run out of temporary space (even with usually 130-150GB on my temp store.  The thing is, is that adoe doesn't use any of the extra 56GB I have in my Pagefile -- I can't tell it to use more than 100%
    of physical memory -- (i.e. so it would use part of the page file).  I have 48GB mem, and 56GB pagefile, that's on an SSD., I'd
    rather have it page to the SSD before writing temp files to disk...
    If it could force pages out, to the pagefile, before resorting to a spill file, would save on space and possible speed depending on
    the config...  But , eh, C'est la vie.
    Meanwhile, I's still ike to figure out how to solve the orignal problem, but I'm beginning to think it looks like a core bug...so it maybe hard to get around.
    Thanks for your comments!  As usually, appreciated!...

  • Photoshop Gradient Banding Issues

    I have tried the solutions I have read concerning this issue and none have worked for me. I have used Photoshop for a long time and this didn't used to happen. Why doesn't Adobe fix this issue??? I don't want to use nor should I be expected to use the noise blur solution to fix a problem that didn't used to be a problem. I have gotten by the past few months trying to in most ways design around using photoshop for blends but it is extremely frustrating. Here is what I get no matter what colors I am blending:
    http://michaelsterlingdesign.com/banding.png
    What is the dealio and is there a series of special settings that need to be set when using an Apple iMac that is only 1 year old? I love Adobe products but this is driving me mad.
    Any help I can get will be greatly appreciated.

    It is not just the gradient tool it is the paint brushes that have this problem as well.
    So in essence you are telling me that Apple products can't use or display photoshop images because they aren't up to date with the latest display capabilities?
    I use an iMac at home and a Mac Pro at work with the same display results.
    Bit depth is the cause? 32 bit gives a smoother transition but slows the app way down. So in order to get smooth transitions using the gradient tool or the brushes I have to use 32 bit documents or change the colors in my document by adding noise to them?
    Is this true?

  • Illustrator cs6 gradient mesh issue

    Trying to work with gradient mesh colouring the nodes and every few nodes I colour the selection stops working and i cant select the mesh. Doesn't matter if which selection tool I use or even the gradient mesh tool its still the same issue. I can see the mesh lines and when i click with any tool on the mesh lines will show up in black but i cant select it to see the nodes. The only way that i've found around this is to save the work, close the file and reopen it. It's starting to be a pain as im having to do this every couple minutes.
    I've done all CS6 updates and still getting the same issues so now im stumped.
    Thanks in advance for any and all help!
    Chaz

  • Adjustment Layer Issue in CS3 & new Mac Pro

    anyone having the following issue:
    when adding an adjustment layer to a file I get a spinning beachball for 10-30 seconds before the adjustment layer is applied. Strange behaviour never seen before. New Mac Pro Dual Quad 3.2ghz, 10gb Ram, Nvidia Gefore 8800GT.
    S.O.S.
    Thx!

    How did you update to 10.5.3?
    Via Software Update; or from the COMBO?
    [I notice that MacFixit are also now strenuously urging people to stay away from SU and to use the COMBO instead.
    [Pace Stockholm!]
    And did you run DiskWarrior and Repair permissions both before and after you installed the new software?

  • Gradient banding issues in CS3

    CS3 has a gradient banding problem that no-one seems to be openly acknowledging or addressing.
    If i make a graduated background in either Illustrator or Photoshop there is obvious banding in the gradient fill.
    I have researched the problem on the net and it seems that many people are experiencing this problem but that there is no known solution or patch form Adobe to fix this. Only useless suggestions about work arounds for this simple exercise. Interestingly several people report never experiencing this problem until they upgraded from CS to CS3. I also fit this category.
    I run a mixed Mac/PC network and CS3 produces fairly large background gradients perfectly in PS on my PC, though not in Il. My macs fail to produce gradients of any useful size without significant banding in both PS and Il.
    I know that many other people have this issue - when is Adode going to publish something useful to address it?

    John,
    Where do you get the idea that Document Raster Effects settings should match a "document resolution" of 5080 or 2540?
    > "300" is way too low ( if you are referring to document resolution, not image resolution )
    Document Raster Effects
    is a raster image resolution setting: it's the resolution of the raster images that are created by Illustrator's raster effect features. Specifying a raster resolution that is 1:1 with an imagesetter's dpi is ridiculous.
    Further, where exactly is it that you "usually" set a "document resolution" in Illustrator CS3? The document resolution setting in earlier versions was simply the flatness setting, and defaulted to "800 dpi" (which is a flatness of 3, assuming a 2400 dpi imaging device). That setting is no longer even present in Illustrator, since (as I recall) AI 10. Flatness had nothing to do with grad fills; it affects curve accuracy.
    You guys are talking about a problem with banding--the OP implying that he has been investigating the problem for some time--responders even offering suggestions to "fix" it. Yet no one in this thread has yet stated any of the
    specifics that are necessary to even talk about banding:
    Where
    is the problematic banding occurring? Paddy Rogers does not even say whether he is talking about banding
    on screen or in
    output.
    Assuming the banding is in printed output, what kind of device is it? If it's an imagesetter, is it using PostScript level 3?
    What are the CMYK color values between stops of the of the page-size grad fill?
    What is the size of the page (distance the grad spans)?
    What is the halftone ruling being used?
    These suggested "fixes" are myths:
    Rasterizing the artwork
    This is nonsense. It doesn't matter if the color values across a uniform grad are from vector commands or actual colors of pixel bands. Raster grads yield banded results just as easily as vector grads do. Banding is a function of the dot size and halftone ruling of a printing device. Rasterizing doesn't magically increase the resolution of a printing device.
    Setting Raster Effects Resolution to a higher value
    This has nothing to do with grad fills in Illustrator. A grad fill is not a raster effect.
    Transparency Flattener Settings
    Again, has nothing to do with banding in grad fills. A low setting may result in pixelation, not banding.
    Antialiasing
    Has nothing to do with banding in graduated fills.
    Paddy, you claim that you are experiencing increased banding in both Photoshop CS3 and Illustrator CS3, as compared to the CS versions of those apps. Have you actually compared the
    same files being sent to the
    same printing device? If so, provide the specifics of a page-size grad that reliably produces the problematic banding. Be sure to state exactly what device you are printing to.
    JET

  • Probelms with PS CS5 - Cant add a transparent gradient layer mask to a layer - please help

    My company just upgraded us to cs5 on our macs. I was working along in photoshop & dont know if I hit something inadvertently or what but all of a sudden I cannot add a black to transp gradient to a layer mask. Ive searched around even saved out and re-loaded the gradients from my pc (which has the black to transparent gradient in the gradient editor & the process works fine).
    Funny thing is that in the mac gradient picker, the black to transparent gradient is black and solid white but the name of it is 'black to transparent' in the editor. Ive tried
    I guess my questions would be how would one make a transparent gradient, or how would one reset the gradients to default becuase every time i delete all the gradients the add a new .grd file from my pc, it still does not show the gradient.
    Its amazing how such a small thing like this saves so much time and its eating me up that I cant get this to work
    Thanks in advance, Mark

    C:\Users\User\AppData\Roaming\Adobe\Adobe Photoshop CS4\Adobe Photoshop CS4 Settings
    This is where I finally found the prefs.psp file.  At least this is the way my Vista machinie is set up.  Your "User" config may be diferrent from mine.
    But, Thanks for the right answer!.  My transparent layer is now only showing the faint gray checkboard instead of black.
    Rob_L

  • DW8 Layer Issue?

    I'm having an issue with layers in Dreamweaver 8? The layout
    of my site is in the "center" position. When I position a layer in
    the layout of the site, the layers do not correspond to those
    positions when I preview in a browser. What gives?

    engmix wrote:
    > I'm having an issue with layers in Dreamweaver 8? The
    layout of my site is in
    > the "center" position. When I position a layer in the
    layout of the site, the
    > layers do not correspond to those positions when I
    preview in a browser. What
    > gives?
    >
    Sounds as though you are using absolutely positioned layers
    which have a
    top and a left position.
    That is where they will stay regardless of where you want
    them to appear.
    If you want them to appear central in the browser window then
    you will
    have to place them in a realtively positioned <div>
    container
    <div id="container">
    Paste all of your layers within this container.
    </div>
    Cut this piece of code and paste it into your pages code
    directly before
    the closing </head> tag which can be located near the
    top of your page
    whilst in code view.
    <style type="text/css">
    #container {
    width: 750px;
    margin: 0 auto;
    </style>

  • Place images, reassemble slices, layer issues

    I am creating a sprite of images I have in the bridge. I placed button images from the bridge.  I tried to merge the layers so there is only one layer for the sprite.  When I did the merge the images got locked onto the background layer and I can't move the images around on the layer to reassemble the buttons.  I created a layer called background that was black so I could see the greyed out buttons better while reassembling them from slices.  I will turn off the background layer after I got the pieces put together. 
    Because the images were locked down I started over and noticed while sizing the canvas that the canvas has a background color and also the layers have background contents.  I just need a dark background I can turn off after I get all the pieces put together so I can see the really light buttons.  I don't know if I need a background or not.
    Also as I placed images I noticed when I clicked the image in the bridge fireworks turns on.  This got annoying.  I thought I was double clicking the images in the bridge and that was opening fireworks so I barely touched the images and it still opens fireworks.  How can I turn off fireworks so it doesn't open at all.  I don't need it.
    I am assuming if I merge the images onto the first layer the images can be moved around with the move tool.  I unlocked the first one I tried that was merged to the background layer and it created a layer named layer0 and I still could not move the images with the hand tool.
    I also noticed that as I was placing images some of them went all on the same document but some of them started a new document.  I intended for them to all be on one document and I don't know why it started a second one and added some of the images to the second file?
    thanks,

    Ok, if you want to move each image individually from the others then do not merge the layers it is possible to move them, but it is much more difficult. Let the merge layers be the last thing you do.
    In fact, save a psd file with the layers intact and save another file that was merged. This way you can always go back and rearrange, edit, etc. without having to start over if that is what you were doing.
    Usually merging will merge all the layers and put them all into a single unlocked layer (once they are in a single layer they behave as one) Flattening the layers though will put all the layers into a single locked background layer.
    If the layer is locked, you can either double click on the background layer and click OK to unlock it, or just drag the lock icon from that layer to the trash can.
    If the background (portion of the image that is not your objects) is transparent you can create a new layer and move that layer below your merged layer (or all of the unmerged layers) and fill it with a color for the background.
    Keep in mind that flattening will fill transparent part of the image to a white background, whereas merging will keep the transparency because the layer is not locked as a background.
    Pay attention to what file format you save your file as, as not all formats support transparency. Stick with psd, png, tiff for example. saving as a jpg will result in a file that is the same as flattening the layers as it does not support transparency or layers. Tiff and psd are the only two I know that support layers.
    If all the images have been merged or flattened and you have no way of going back, then you are going to have to use the selection tools to select each object and copy/paste to a new layer (on a windows system ctrl-j will do the work of copy/paste in a single step)
    As for Fireworks starting from Bridge, I am thinking your double click in your mouse settings are too sensitive. But for stoping Fireworks altogether, you can go into the preferences, look for file type associations and then look for that file format. Click on that format and change what program is to open that file.

  • Button Layer Issue

    Hello,
    Having trouble figuring out what the correct actionscript for
    a button that is trying to access a labeled frame within a movie
    that is part of a larger movie. It works if I play it by itself
    outside of the larger movie, but I'm not sure how to get it to work
    within. This is what I have so far:
    on (release){
    _level0.gotoAndPlay ("next")
    I've tried changing it to:
    contents._level0.gotoAndPlay ("next")
    ...but it didn't work. "contents" is the symbol that the file
    is being loaded into.
    Cheers

    Thanks for your reply! I tried your second advice and it's
    still not working. Maybe I didn't explain it thoroughly. I have
    Movie 2 loaded into Movie 1 (through a symbol called "contents").
    Movie 2 has a symbol that is several layers with a button on layer
    3. I want the button to go to and play label "next" on Movie 2's
    timeline when it is released. Does this change anything?

  • Nokia Service Layer issue with NSU

    Well i have just installed NSU and ran it for the first time and this is the error message i am getting while the splash screen is displayed.
    "Nokia Service Layer Host Process has encountered a problem and needs to close. We are sorry for the inconvenience."
    everytime i get this.
    I've seen the topic about an "internal error" and tried the dll fix but that didn't work.
    any suggestions?

    turned out it was my firewall which was preventing the application to connect to the net to check for anything.
    i turned off zonealarm but somehow it still locked it out so i had to keep zonealarm running and give the NSU access when it ran.
    Kinda strange that zonealarm locked it when the firewall wasn't running but its fixed now.

Maybe you are looking for

  • HP Mini Netbook Power Switch

    My sister is not able to power on her HP Mini 1010NR netbook.  I was looking at the HP Mini 1000 Mainteance ans Service guild and could not find a part number for the replacement switch.  Is there a parts manual and breakdown on this hardware area? 

  • DVD player will not play widescreen video properly...

    I just created a widescreen DVD on iDVD that I was planning on watching on a standard sized television, meaning, I was expecting black bars on the footage. I popped the DVD into my Panasonic DVD player and it seems it enlarges the video and crops out

  • Windows.Launch contract failed with error: The app didn't start..

    We have installed windows 8 Prof X64 Edition; none of the Metro apps are not getting launched; the system is added in domain, the event viewer has the below information for one of the app. Event Under: Applications App microsoft.windowscommunications

  • Retrival of  values based on Batch Characteristics

    Dear all I am maintining some characteristics for a material on Batch classes. Like to pull the total stock based on any 1 these characteristics.Kindly suggest what are the tables we can use for this and logic Thanx MK

  • HT1430 do not disturb will not turn off

    the new feature will not turn off even though I have turned it off...I cannot receive calls from job, family, or anyone