GRC AC RAR rules not picked up

Hello All,
I am new to GRC AC and we have a sandbox set up. When looking at SRM a user that has SAP_ALL and is set up in the Java stack for open access. When we run the RAR for this user there are a number of the standard rules that are not showing up. I can explain away the ones that are cross system (ECC and SRM because we have not yet set up the Cross System to look at both) however there are a number of rules that are strictly SRM that are not being picked up can anyone explain why?
Thanks
MK

Similar Messages

SAP GRC RAR Rules Generation Job Error - SP13 application

Hello,
we applied SP 13 on GRC and RAR Rule Generation job is always in "error" status; below I list an example of job log:
INFO: -
Scheduling Job =>237----
Apr 4, 2011 1:36:12 PM com.virsa.cc.xsys.bg.BgJob run
INFO: --- Starting Job ID:237 (RULE_GENERATION) - generate f113
Apr 4, 2011 1:36:12 PM com.virsa.cc.xsys.util.Lock lock
FINEST: Lock:1007
Apr 4, 2011 1:36:12 PM com.virsa.cc.xsys.bg.BgJob setStatus
INFO: Job ID: 237 Status: Running
Apr 4, 2011 1:36:12 PM com.virsa.cc.xsys.bg.BgJob updateJobHistory
FINEST: --- @@@@@@@@@@@ Updating the Job History -
1@@Msg is generate f113 started :threadid: 1
Apr 4, 2011 1:36:12 PM com.virsa.cc.xsys.bg.dao.BgJobHistoryDAO insert
INFO: -
Background Job History: job id=237, status=1, message=generate f113 started :threadid: 1
Apr 4, 2011 1:36:12 PM com.virsa.cc.xsys.util.Lock unlock
FINEST: Unlock:1007
Apr 4, 2011 1:36:12 PM com.virsa.cc.xsys.bg.BgJob ruleGeneration
INFO: @@@--- Rule ruleGeneration Started ....237
Apr 4, 2011 1:36:12 PM com.virsa.cc.xsys.bg.BgJob run
WARNING: *** Job Exception: null
java.lang.NullPointerException
     at com.virsa.cc.xsys.bg.BgJob.ruleGeneration(BgJob.java:1245)
     at com.virsa.cc.xsys.bg.BgJob.runJob(BgJob.java:609)
     at com.virsa.cc.xsys.bg.BgJob.run(BgJob.java:363)
     at com.virsa.cc.xsys.riskanalysis.AnalysisDaemonBgJob.scheduleJob(AnalysisDaemonBgJob.java:375)
     at com.virsa.cc.xsys.riskanalysis.AnalysisDaemonBgJob.start(AnalysisDaemonBgJob.java:92)
     at com.virsa.cc.comp.BgJobInvokerView.wdDoModifyView(BgJobInvokerView.java:444)
     at com.virsa.cc.comp.wdp.InternalBgJobInvokerView.wdDoModifyView(InternalBgJobInvokerView.java:1236)
     at com.sap.tc.webdynpro.progmodel.generation.DelegatingView.doModifyView(DelegatingView.java:78)
     at com.sap.tc.webdynpro.progmodel.view.View.modifyView(View.java:337)
     at com.sap.tc.webdynpro.clientserver.cal.ClientComponent.doModifyView(ClientComponent.java:481)
     at com.sap.tc.webdynpro.clientserver.window.WindowPhaseModel.doModifyView(WindowPhaseModel.java:551)
     at com.sap.tc.webdynpro.clientserver.window.WindowPhaseModel.processRequest(WindowPhaseModel.java:148)
     at com.sap.tc.webdynpro.clientserver.window.WebDynproWindow.processRequest(WebDynproWindow.java:335)
     at com.sap.tc.webdynpro.clientserver.cal.AbstractClient.executeTasks(AbstractClient.java:143)
     at com.sap.tc.webdynpro.clientserver.session.ApplicationSession.doProcessing(ApplicationSession.java:333)
     at com.sap.tc.webdynpro.clientserver.session.ClientSession.doApplicationProcessingStandalone(ClientSession.java:741)
     at com.sap.tc.webdynpro.clientserver.session.ClientSession.doApplicationProcessing(ClientSession.java:694)
     at com.sap.tc.webdynpro.clientserver.session.ClientSession.doProcessing(ClientSession.java:253)
     at com.sap.tc.webdynpro.clientserver.session.RequestManager.doProcessing(RequestManager.java:149)
     at com.sap.tc.webdynpro.serverimpl.defaultimpl.DispatcherServlet.doContent(DispatcherServlet.java:62)
     at com.sap.tc.webdynpro.serverimpl.defaultimpl.DispatcherServlet.doGet(DispatcherServlet.java:46)
     at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:740)
     at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:853)
     at com.sap.engine.services.servlets_jsp.server.HttpHandlerImpl.runServlet(HttpHandlerImpl.java:401)
     at com.sap.engine.services.servlets_jsp.server.HttpHandlerImpl.handleRequest(HttpHandlerImpl.java:266)
     at com.sap.engine.services.httpserver.server.RequestAnalizer.startServlet(RequestAnalizer.java:386)
     at com.sap.engine.services.httpserver.server.RequestAnalizer.startServlet(RequestAnalizer.java:364)
     at com.sap.engine.services.httpserver.server.RequestAnalizer.invokeWebContainer(RequestAnalizer.java:1060)
     at com.sap.engine.services.httpserver.server.RequestAnalizer.handle(RequestAnalizer.java:265)
     at com.sap.engine.services.httpserver.server.Client.handle(Client.java:95)
     at com.sap.engine.services.httpserver.server.Processor.request(Processor.java:175)
     at com.sap.engine.core.service630.context.cluster.session.ApplicationSessionMessageListener.process(ApplicationSessionMessageListener.java:33)
     at com.sap.engine.core.cluster.impl6.session.MessageRunner.run(MessageRunner.java:41)
     at com.sap.engine.core.thread.impl3.ActionObject.run(ActionObject.java:37)
     at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method)
     at com.sap.engine.core.thread.impl3.SingleThread.execute(SingleThread.java:104)
     at com.sap.engine.core.thread.impl3.SingleThread.run(SingleThread.java:176)
Apr 4, 2011 1:36:12 PM com.virsa.cc.xsys.bg.BgJob setStatus
INFO: Job ID: 237 Status: Error
Apr 4, 2011 1:36:12 PM com.virsa.cc.xsys.bg.BgJob updateJobHistory
FINEST: --- @@@@@@@@@@@ Updating the Job History -
2@@Msg is Error while executing the Job:null
Apr 4, 2011 1:36:12 PM com.virsa.cc.xsys.bg.dao.BgJobHistoryDAO insert
INFO: -
Background Job History: job id=237, status=2, message=Error while executing the Job:null
Apr 4, 2011 1:36:12 PM com.virsa.cc.xsys.riskanalysis.AnalysisDaemonBgJob scheduleJob
INFO: -
Complted Job =>237----
Apr 4, 2011 1:36:13 PM com.virsa.cc.xsys.util.Lock lock
WARNING: It is used by the same owner: For current thread retrying to get lock : 1001
Apr 4, 2011 1:36:13 PM com.virsa.cc.xsys.util.Lock lock
FINEST: Lock:1001
Apr 4, 2011 1:36:13 PM com.virsa.cc.xsys.util.Lock unlock
FINEST: Unlock:1001
Is there someone that can help me?
I checked and it seems that "Use NetWeaver Logical Lock" in config tab has to be set to "No"...is it correct for you or have you got other tips?
Thx to all

Hello,
actuallt current values are:
Row CNFGPARAM| CNFGSEQ| CNFGVALUE|
35 250 0 NO
36 251 0 YES
Value for 250 is ok based on your feedback.
Value for 251 is based on SNOTE 1508611, even if SDN forum suggests "0" against the note.
Have you got any tips?

COPA Derivation rule not running in background

Hi all
We are encountering a strange problem during derviation in document posting & creation of assets.
We have added a characteristic value Material group to the profitability segment and have added a derivation rule in KEDR based on order.
The rule is if the value of order number is filled then the material group is assigned a value.
Order number Assigned Material Group
Z0000000001 = 001210
The problem is that we have to manually go into the PA segment and click the derivation button OR just press enter to get the derivation working.
If we do not access the PA segment area then the derivation is not carried out in the background.
I have tried searching for notes and for some relevancy on the forums.
I have also taken screen-shots and uploaded them, please view in order.
Derivation Rule
http://i116.photobucket.com/albums/o23/zkage/Deriv1.jpg
Document Posting(Deriv rule not picked even order is placed)
http://i116.photobucket.com/albums/o23/zkage/deriv2.jpg
The PA segment before pressing enter or the button derivation
http://i116.photobucket.com/albums/o23/zkage/deriv4.jpg
The PA segment after pressing the button
http://i116.photobucket.com/albums/o23/zkage/deriv3.jpg
We require that the derivation runs in the background after we enter the line item details. The system is not picking the derivation if we directly post the document without checking the PA segment.
If there is some BADI or user exit we could use to manually replace the COPA characteristics explicitly at document posting, please let me know
Thank You

Hi,
You have to use the rule,
Moves it let you copy a constant or the content of the source field to target field.
With regards
krishna

Blank values in RAR Rules - RAR (SAP GRC AC 5.3)

Hello,
We are working on the deployment of a GRC Access Control 5.3 system in a main customer and we have found next issues about AC 5.3:
When a rule with a Blank value in u201CValue Fromu201D and u201CValue Tou201D columns is set, RAR is not taking users with any u201CValue Fromu201D / u201C Value Tou201D for that rule. In fact we are seeing that only users with value: * in u201CValue Fromu201D column are taken. It doesnu2019t fit with the standard SAP practices. Could you confirm this issue? How could we set a rule for taking any value?
Rule Example:
Object: F_BKPF_BUK   Field: ACTVT    Value From:      Value To:         Condition: AND            Status: ENABLE
User1 value:
Object: F_BKPF_BUK   Field: ACTVT    Value From: 4   Value To:         (Itu2019s NOT taken)
User2 value:
Object: F_BKPF_BUK   Field: ACTVT    Value From: 5   Value To:         (Itu2019s NOT taken)
User3 value:
Object: F_BKPF_BUK   Field: ACTVT    Value From: *   Value To:         (Itu2019s taken)
Best regards.

You need to distinguish between the value in the authorization field of the object and the search pattern.
is only looking for the field name. It does not even care about the value.
Values '4' and '5' are not valid for F_BKPF_BUK (see table TACTZ) so unless you populate UST12-BIS (what you call "Value To:" then you won't get a result.
I faintly suspect that you are "cooking the books" at the file level, and are expecting the GRC system and possibly the ABAP system as well to use the same logic?
Can you explain what User1 + User2 are expected to achieve with these values.
The system does sometimes make DUMMY checks (see the ABAP key word documentation in transaction ABAPDOCU) but this is not the correct strategy to pass those checks in my opinion.
I also suspect that this is an "action" in the customer name space. Perhaps you are using an unreleased FM instead of a BOR object? See transaction BAPI for more infos and finding the correct BOR (Business Object Repository) so that your RAR is not confused by dodgey coding....
Cheers,
Julius

GRC-AC v5.3 SP11 -- RAR Rules for BI, GTS, SRM, XI, GRC-AC, SolMan

Hi!
Has SAP released RAR Rule sets for BI, GTS, SRM, XI, GRC-AC, or Solution Manager?
Let me know if anyone else has found them.
Thanks,
-john

Hi John,
SRM rules have always been available. I have not seen rules for BI, GTS, XI, AC or SolMan. Would definitely want to see rules for XI, BI and SolMan.
Alpesh

CUP- Request not picking approvers from BRF+ - 10.0

Hi,
We are on SP7 - GRC 10.0
We created the BRF+ conditions with business process and given user id as the Agent condition for approver. MSMP workflow was created with the above agent.
When we create a request it is getting successfully created but not appearing in the workinbox of Approver. We checked the Instant status and there it shows the path and the stage where it is but the Approvers column as blank.
We used the same conditions in SP 5 and no issues were identified. After upgrade to SP7 we are facing the issue.
Is there anything which is missed in settings?
Thanks and Best Regards,
Srihari.K

Hi Nikita & Joshita,
Further to above
We replicated the same scenario in our sandbox environment and it worked fine. But when it comes to Dev system its not working.
I observed the following difference in Agent Decision table from Sandbox & Dev
Sandbox:
Result Data Object
- Return all matches found
- Return an initial value if no match is found
- Return an exception if partial match is found
- Seggregate the result data object into its constituent elements
1) & 4) are checked and Result Data Object : GRFN_MW_T_AGENT [All these were taken by default]
Dev:
- Return all matches found
- Return an initial value if no match is found
- Return an exception if partial match is found
2) is checked and Result Data OBject : Result-Agent Rule
How these differences when both are on same SP 7. Is there any thing wrong in the above setting which needs to be corrected. Where the agent rule is not picking up the approvers ?
Thanks and Best Regards,
Srihari.K

Need information on the new RAR Rule Architect/Rule Set functions

Does anyone have any information on the new 5.3 functions listed under Rule Architect/Rule Sets, specifically the Compare function?
My 5.3 Config manual mentions this area but doesn't describe anything about it. I have a request from our user group and need to determine if this can fit that request.
What they are looking for is an easy way to compare our RAR Rule Set with the latest SAP version (Q2 2010 is the most recent I believe). Just from the screen shots, it looks like we could maybe use the Rule Sets functions for that. Load the new SAP one into RAR as a separate ruleset and then run this Compare function. However I haven't been able to find any documentation on this function, so I don't know if it really does what we are looking for.
Thanks.

Hi,
the error 'NullPointerException ' is very common error in GRC.
kindly search, you will find lots of threads and notes on thi.
check you permission TXT file. It contain null value some where.
especially check SD01 & SD02 tcodes.
Also open permission file in word and check all TAB's and ENTER's in technical view.
Regards,
Surpreet

RAR - Rules Upload

Hi Experts,
From the RAR, I can see the default "Global" ruleset. I went to the Configuration tab, navigated to Rule Upload > Generare Rules, and clicked on the Foreground button, and I see a list of Risk Description, conflicting conflicts etc etc.
However, I did not want to use the Global ruleset, as I have a customized ruleset which addresses my client's SoD concerns very specifically. What I did first was to export the all components of the rules (as a backup) and then I navigated to the Rule Architect Tab, and manually deleted all the Risks, Functions, Rule Sets and Business Process (in that order).
I then proceeded to the Configuration tab > Rule Upload and uploaded the Business process, Function, Function Authorisation, Rule Set and Risk. No error messages encountered as I followed the Rule File Templates as per the configuration guide. But it also does not tell me if I was successful in importing those files. (so I assumed no error message = import successful)
However, when I navigated to Rule Upload > Generate Rules, and clicked on the Foreground button, I was unable to see any list generated this time. I tried to export all the components of the rules (based on what I imported) to troubleshoot, and I found that the "function_permission.txt" and the "Risk_desc.txt" portions were missing from the exported textfile. However, all the other information from other text files are in that exported text file.
From initial analysis, this seems like the Function Authorisation and the Risk files may not have been imported successfully. Would like to know if anyone has encountered this problem and what actions should be taken to rectify it?
Thanks!

Hi Experts,
Thanks for your response.
I followed the Rule Set Template from the configuration guide to the letter.
Upon closer inspection of the contents in what I exported, I discovered that for the "function_action.txt" portion, the Tcodes of some of the business process were not found, for e.g.
Business Process FA may have tcodes under function action Tab, but business process IM seems to have no tcodes under the function action Tab. I suspect that during the import, certain business processes were not "picked up", whereas others were. It was a clean omission of tcodes from IM business process. Does the naming convention of business process follow some reserved words (i.e. financial accounting must be FA, procurement Must be PR etc to be same as the global ruleset)?
In addition, for those business process which have tcodes reflected in the function action Tab, I tried to click on the "+" to expand and see the objects, fields and values under the function permission Tab, but it cannot be expanded (i.e. blank).

Will GRC AC RAR (CC) add value to SOA based SAP implementation?

Hello GRC Experts,
I thought of asking other GRC experts to get their opinions on the GRC AC RAR for the following scenario:
These days there are numerous SAP clients implementing SOA based Composite Applications using the CAF. These SAP PORTAL applications use Adaptive RFC (direct calls) and Web services calls (thru PI/middleware) to the back end SAP applications to complete the 75-100% of the work. The remaining 0-25% work may be completed using the transaction codes. There are also calls to the back end systems originating from non-SAP applications using the web services via some middleware tool to complete the 100% work.
When the GRC AC RAR deals only transaction codes and their associated authorization objects, how do you assess the risk for this type of access in GRC AC RAR and how do you build a custom rules matrix for this type of applications?
Thanks,
Himadama

Hello again,
Has anyone implemented SAP GRC RAR for the SOA based application? What are the challenges faced? If this is not possible, then anyone has any idea if this is covered in GRC AC 2010 version.
Regards,
Himadama

Gross Price is not picked up upon creation of a requisition from a network!

Hi gurus,
I would like to seek for help, actually problem is related in SD but I pose this thread here because it is related in debugging issue.
do you know about "perform ROW_OUT " function? we have a bug that is very rare, when user select gross type with figures (ei. 1000, or any number).. system will not pick up the value instead it will be default in ZERO, but when user try to select again it output the correct expected result,,I debug it a dozen times but i cant catch the zero issue, *(-creating watch point wherein TBTWR = 0 and TBTWR <> 0 and the last point of intersection is in row_out sunction and MOVE-CORRESPONDING IX_ESLL to: ESLL) /* Is there someone OF you encountered this ?? if theres one please give some insight on how you pin point the problem in system .. note: all related program and process here is all standard (No custom program involve)..
Cheers,
Mark

Hi
Generally for posting FI documents (which is what this T Code does) , M alone is used which is the standard SAP system functionality. For other purposes like valuation, translation, etc. we can have different exchange rate types.
Jayaram

Dynamic JNDI in FTP Adapter | jca.jndi property not picked by Adapter

Hi,
I am trying to pass jndi dynamically to FTP adapter using the steps mentioned in http://blogs.oracle.com/adapters/entry/changing_the_connection_factory_jndi_dynamically_in_ftp_adapter.
I have configured FTP jndi(eis/Ftp/SoaFtpAdapter) at app server.
And included the following property in the invoke activity that calls the FTP adapter
<bpelx:inputProperty name="jca.jndi" variable="jndiLocation"/>
Invoke activity definition looks as following
    <invoke name="Invoke1"
            partnerLink="FTPFileListAdap" portType="ns3:FileListing_ptt"
            operation="FileListing"
            inputVariable="Invoke1_FileListing_InputVariable"
            outputVariable="Invoke1_FileListing_OutputVariable"
            bpelx:invokeAsDetail="no">
      <bpelx:inputProperty name="jca.jndi" variable="jndiLocation"/>
      <bpelx:toProperties>
        <bpelx:toProperty name="jca.ftp.Directory" variable="directoryName"/>
      </bpelx:toProperties>
    </invoke>FTP Adapter jca configuration is as following
<adapter-config name="FTPFileListAdap" adapter="FTP Adapter" wsdlLocation="FTPFileListAdap.wsdl" xmlns="http://platform.integration.oracle/blocks/adapter/fw/metadata">
<connection-factory location="eis/Ftp/SoaFtpAdapter12" UIincludeWildcard="*.txt"/>
<endpoint-interaction portType="FileListing_ptt" operation="FileListing">
    <interaction-spec className="oracle.tip.adapter.ftp.outbound.FTPListInteractionSpec">
      <property name="PhysicalDirectory" value="/in/dev"/>
      <property name="Recursive" value="true"/>
      <property name="IncludeFiles" value=".*\.txt"/>
    </interaction-spec>
</endpoint-interaction>
</adapter-config>While calling the BPEL i am passing two parameters
jndiLocation = eis/Ftp/SoaFtpAdapter
and
directoryName = /in/dev
Following is the fault that I am getting while executing the BPEL.
<fault>
<bpelFault>
<faultType>0</faultType>
<bindingFault>
<part name="summary">
<summary>Exception occured when binding was invoked. Exception occured during invocation of JCA binding: "JCA Binding execute of Reference operation 'FileListing' failed due to: JCA Binding Component connection issue. JCA Binding Component is unable to create an outbound JCA (CCI) connection. RunTimeConfigFTP:FTPFileListAdap [ FileListing_ptt::FileListing(Empty,filelist) ] : The JCA Binding Component was unable to establish an outbound JCA CCI connection due to the following issue: BINDING.JCA-12510 JCA Resource Adapter location error. Unable to locate the JCA Resource Adapter via .jca binding file element <connection-factory/> The JCA Binding Component is unable to startup the Resource Adapter specified in the <connection-factory/> element: location='eis/Ftp/SoaFtpAdapter12'. The reason for this is most likely that either 1) the Resource Adapters RAR file has not been deployed successfully to the WebLogic Application server or 2) the '<jndi-name>' element in weblogic-ra.xml has not been set to eis/Ftp/SoaFtpAdapter12. In the last case you will have to add a new WebLogic JCA connection factory (deploy a RAR). Please correct this and then restart the Application Server Please make sure that the JCA connection factory and any dependent connection factories have been configured with a sufficient limit for max connections. Please also make sure that the physical connection to the backend EIS is available and the backend itself is accepting connections. ". The invoked JCA adapter raised a resource exception. Please examine the above error message carefully to determine a resolution. </summary>
</part>
<part name="detail">
<detail>JCA Resource Adapter location error. Unable to locate the JCA Resource Adapter via .jca binding file element <connection-factory/> The JCA Binding Component is unable to startup the Resource Adapter specified in the <connection-factory/> element: location='eis/Ftp/SoaFtpAdapter12'. The reason for this is most likely that either 1) the Resource Adapters RAR file has not been deployed successfully to the WebLogic Application server or 2) the '<jndi-name>' element in weblogic-ra.xml has not been set to eis/Ftp/SoaFtpAdapter12. In the last case you will have to add a new WebLogic JCA connection factory (deploy a RAR). Please correct this and then restart the Application Server </detail>
</part>
<part name="code">
<code>12510</code>
</part>
</bindingFault>
</bpelFault>
</fault>It seems that FTP Adapter is not picking up the value from jca.jndi property.
How to handle this situation.
Thanks
Ajay

Hi,
Since I am working on BPEL 2.0
Following changes solved my problem.
In the invoke activity, I replaced the following xml tag
      <bpelx:inputProperty name="jca.jndi" variable="jndiLocation"/>with following
      <bpelx:toProperties>
        <bpelx:toProperty name="jca.jndi" variable="jndiLocation"/>
      </bpelx:toProperties> And now my invoke activity looks as follow.
    <invoke name="Invoke1"
            partnerLink="FTPFileListAdap" portType="ns3:FileListing_ptt"
            operation="FileListing"
            inputVariable="Invoke1_FileListing_InputVariable"
            outputVariable="Invoke1_FileListing_OutputVariable"
            bpelx:invokeAsDetail="no">
      <bpelx:toProperties>
        <bpelx:toProperty name="jca.ftp.Directory" variable="directoryName"/>
      </bpelx:toProperties>
      <bpelx:toProperties>
        <bpelx:toProperty name="jca.jndi" variable="jndiLocation"/>
      </bpelx:toProperties>
    </invoke>Thanks
Ajay

Change Management & Change Transport Process in GRC AC RAR

With RAR not being able to leverage the SAP ABAP Change Management Process (CTS) what is the best practise for controlling the changes for RAR rule set ?
How do we acheive job segregation from
1. Making Changes to Rules in Dev RAR
2. Transporting (Importing) them to RAR Prod
How do we make sure the 'Import Rules' functionality is restricted. ? (Can we remove Action 'ImportRules' from all the roles and restrict that to one role & restrict the administrator from making role assignments directly in RAR (Only from CUP) )
Thanks

Hi Prashanth,
You can restrict the access by removing the action ImportRules from the customized role that you can create in UME for RAR.
Thanks,
Darshan

Automatic Payment Program(F111) not picking Bank Sub accounts

Dear all,
The entiries genertaed from automatic payment program(F111) is not picking the bank sub accounts (Receipts/Payment GLs) which are given in the following node:-
Financial Accounting --> Bank Accounting --> Business Transactions -->Payment Transactions --> Payment Request --> Define Clearing Accts forReceiving Bank for Acct. Transfer
It is picking the Main Bank GL, which has given in bank master(FI12).
Please advise.
Thanks & regards
Ramesh Nair

Hi,
The config : Financial Accounting --> Bank Accounting --> Business Transactions -->Payment Transactions --> Payment Request --> Define Clearing Accts for Receiving Bank for Acct. Transfer
Is to decide bank sub account of the sending bank, when you are doing Bank to Bank transfer. This is manditory for cash management bank to bank transfer. Please read the config documentation again.
I just cut and paste from SAP documentaion.
"In this activity you define the offsetting accounts for the receiving bank accounts for bank account transfers (payments between house bank accounts) which should be posted to when payment is made.
The entries are necessary when payment requests are created for cash management payment advice notes that result from cash concentration, for example. The offsetting accounts for the paying house bank are determined by the payment program specifcations and the payment methods used. The offsetting accounts for the receiving house bank cannot be determined from these specifications, however, but can be defined in this section. "
Now, when you are creating payments with F111 and if you want to get sub accounts for house bank you have to do the following config.
F111 -> Maintain Configuration -> Bank determination -> Bank accounts ( for each accont id and payment method combination ).
Then you will see payments from this sub accounts and you have to setup posting rule to clear this account if you are doing EBS.

Process order not picking up a batch...

Hello gurus,
I have created a process order for a mater FIN in which iam using a RAW...but when i create a process order for the FIN and go to MIGO to do a GI, its not picking up a batch of RAW automatically and instead i have to pick a batch manually...
Any suggestions much appreciated
Sri.

HI
1.you have to assign the batch in COR2 for the components.
or
2.you have to use batch determination process
COB1 - is used when you want to do Batch Determination in Production / Process order itself.
MBC1 - is used during Goods issue / Goods Transfer
For doing Batch Determination on the basis of any characteristic you have to maintain sort rule.T.code is CU70.
go with link
http://www.sap-img.com/sap-sd/some-light-on-batch-determination.htm
forum answer
batch determination
-ashok
Edited by: Ashok Keerthipati on Dec 18, 2008 11:24 AM

Manual BRS system not picking the doc for clearing the payment

While processing Manual bank statement if i am using referance doc no system not picking doc no for clearing the bank payment. So that after finishing BRs I am matching the doc manually, in f-04. This is taking long time for processing. Anyone can tell me why ref doc no not working and to make it to work, or else any problem is there to use the field. please solve my query.
Edited by: MANISFICO1 on Aug 1, 2011 11:49 AM

Hi:
Please follow as given and hopefully you will be able to resolve the issue.
1...Go to SPRO...Financial Accounting....Bank...Business transactions...Payment Transactions...Manual Bank Statement..Create a new transaction with sign - and do not assign anything in posting rule for now and enter 15 in Algorithm field , save.
2...In define posting keys and posting rules...create an account symbol for the one you did in step 1..In Assign account to account symbol please use account symbol created earlier and acc mode + and currency should be + too. In GL Account area please list the outgoing GL which you are using for outgoing postings..
In create key for posting rule define a posting rule and now go back to step 1 and assign the posting rule you created to the transaction type
In define posting rules please maintain posting rule as define above...in posting area assign 1. give nothing in first posting key.assign account symbol as created earlier...now give give posting key 50..give account credit Bank...and a suitable document you use for posting BRS...In posting type give 4.
Your Manual Bank statement is ready ....
Go to FS00 select your bank outgoing GL account there and in create/bank.interest tab double click on Field status group..in general data make assignment number mandatory for posting...
Go to FB50....post and outgoing transaction using the GL given above it will require you to enter assignment number enter 123 and post.
In FF67 Select the new statement , proceed with your normal data entry and give the transaction you created in above , enter value date, amount and in bank ref field enter 123 as given in FB50.
Save and post it. Now it should work.
Regards

GRC AC RAR rules not picked up

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for