GRC MSMP Process ID SAP_GRAC_ROLE_APPR issue

Hi,
When I try to generate (step 7 MSMP) the Process ID SAP_GRAC_ROLE_APPR,
I get the following error message:
You should insert a data record although there is already a data record
with the same primary key CX_SY_OPEN_SQL_DB => DUPLICATE_KEY
My GRC SP 15
The configuration is DEFAULT!!!
Help!
Regards.

HI, thanks but the problem persist.
I am not using BRFPLUS, the configuration is standard.
My problem is with ID Process SAP_GRAC_ROLE_APPR
Regards.

Similar Messages

Payment Process Profile Duplicate Issue

I'm having an issue when creating templates and adding payment attributes. Two attributes of the same thing come up. I'm guessing this is a bug that we are missing the patch for but am not completely sure on this. I haven't been able to find any previous issues on MOB or the forums. Any help is greatly appreciated. If you want an imagine you can go here.... http://screencast.com/t/1Wldm6WtCe ... or I can attach a word document with screenshots if this would help (via email because I don't see how to do it here). Navigation is below and then information on database is below that.
Navigation: Payables Manager > Payments > Entry > Payments Manager...............then...............
Templates > Payment Attributes.
Information on Oracle Database:
Database Server
RDBMS : 11.2.0.2.0
Oracle Applications : 12.1.3
System Date : 15-SEP-2011 15:47:54
Forms Server
Current Form
Form Application : Application Object Library
Form Name : FNDSCSGN
Form Path : UNKNOWN
Form Version : 12.0.15.12010000.10
Form Last Modified : $Date: 2010/03/21 22:56 $
Scheme Display Profiles
Java Look and Feel : ORACLE
Java Color Scheme :
Color Scheme Indicator : GENERIC
Indicator Colors : Y
Forms
APPSTAND : 12.0.6.12010000.6
APXINWKB : 12.0.601.12010000.316
FNDSCSGN : 12.0.15.12010000.10
Form Menus
FNDMENU : 12.0.2.12010000.6
Forms PL/SQL
APPCORE : 12.0.29.12010000.22
APPFLDR : 12.0.6.12010000.2
CUSTOM : 12.0.0
FNDSQF : 12.0.3.12010000.8
GHR : 12.0.46.12010000.32
GLOBE : 12.0.76.12010000.6
GMS : 12.0.51.12010000.11
IGILUTIL2 : 12.0.32
IGILUTIL : 12.0.3
OPM : 12.0.7.12010000.2
PQH_GEN : 12.0.7
PSA : 12.0.17
PSAC : 12.0.5
PSB : 12.0.2
VERT1 : 12.0.0
VERT2 : 12.0.0
VERT3 : 12.0.0
VERT4 : 12.0.0
VERT5 : 12.0.0
VERT : 12.0.0

Please see these docs.
Duplicate Records: Receipts, Payments, Bank Accounts, Payment Methods, Transaction Codes, Payment Process Profile in Several Modules, Forms - Receipts and Summary, Payments, Bank Transaction Codes etc [ID 444297.1]
R12: APXPAWKB Duplicate Payment Process Profile Appears in Lov of Payment Workbench [ID 759033.1]
Payment Process Profile Shows Duplicate Enteries In List Of Values [ID 1243624.1]
Payment Workbench Error: Payment Process Profile (PPP) Issues (APXPAWKB.FMB) [ID 1325938.1]
Thanks,
Hussein

Joining table in GRC 10 Process Control

Hi,
I am trying to create a new Data Source in GRC 10 Process Control. I need to join tables AGR_1251 (main table) and AGR_USERS. I am selecting AGR_1251 as main table. However, nothing comes up when I try to select AGR_USERS as 'Related Table'. On searching AGR_USERS , the system does not return any tables. Both are transparent tables and hence can be joined. I tried using both 'Reference Tables' as well as 'Dependent Tables' .
Can you also explain the difference between 'Reference Tables' and 'Dependent Tables'.
Regards,

Hi Amarnath,
tables is used to provide the table for the CURR(currency) or QUAN (quantity) fields.
In your case you want to join tables via foreign key(s) and therefore will have to use dependant tables.
The search for table AGR_USERS as dependant table for AGR_1251 will not return anything since the only table
referred as check table (for a foreign key) in AGR_1251 is AGR_DEFINES.
I would suggest to build your query based on defined check tables (see se11) of the needed tables (in this case AGR_DEFINE is the common point of both AGR_USERS & AGR_1251).
Kind regards,
Pascal

GRC 10.0 - Warning Message - Issue - MSMP Workflows

Hi All,
I have a query on below warning message. Need advise from experts here.
In our scenario, at few stages of workflow, approver enters the comments and then clicks on SUBMIT button. Request gets approved. There will be a CLOSE button once the request is approved. Approver clicks on CLOSE button and will be shown a warning message as shown below.
"This application contains unsaved data which may be lost.
Do you want to continue without saving the changes"
Now during our UAT concern was raised by the client team and they don't want to see this message as request is already approved and this message looks irrelevant.
Please suggest if there is a way to avoid showing this message.
Thanks in Advance.
Regards,
Sai.

Hi Andrzej,
Thanks for the details.
I will implement this not and get back to you.
Regards,
Sai.

Vendor consigment process combined goods issue to cusotmer

Hi, All,
I have some questions on the consignment process.
One Scenario: For the MM consgiment without delivery to customer. I listed some steps with my questions below:
1. Create Consigment info record. Is it necessary?
2. Create consignment purchase order Item category K. Is there any special setting?
3. Goods receipt against PO. What's the movement type here? What's the movement type 201 K and 231 K used for? If 101, is it goods receipt to own stock?
4. No invoice verification done, but settlement is done through MRKO transaction. Is it paid consigment fees to vendor by this t-code? What's the accounting happened?
Two Scenario: For the MM consgiment with delivery to customer. I listed some steps with my questions below:
1. Create Consigment info record. Is it necessary?
2. Create consignment purchase order Item category K. Is there any special setting?
3. Goods receipt against PO. Placed in own inventory with a stock category of K. What's the movement type here? what means stock category K?
4. Create normal sales order.
5. Must remove the K from the inventory before a batch can be selected on the delivery-
a. MB1B- 301 transaction is used to removed the K and to reference the delivery number
b. Depending on if location is inventory managed an LU04 may be necessary to complete the movement off of K .
Why movement type 301 is here?
5. Create delivery and PGI (The quantity is different when you do goods receipt for this material)
6. Invoice to customer
7. Payment for that Purchase Order thrgouth MRKO. The issue is only paid to vendor based on the quantity which sent to customer, not on goods receipt. How it can be achieved?
Three Scenario: Is there any process create MM consgiment with delivery directly to customer? What's the process, movement type and what's the difference?
Thank you very much in advance

Hi,
1. Create Consigment info record. Is it necessary?
           Yes, for consignment process, inofrecord is must, price will be picked only from inforecord, you can't enter price in PO.
2. Create consignment purchase order Item category K. Is there any special setting?
           Item category K is standard for consignment PO.
3. Goods receipt against PO. What's the movement type here? What's the movement type 201 K and 231 K used for? If 101, is it goods receipt to own stock?
Movement type is 101, 201k & 231k is for goods issue.
Its not good's receipt ot own stock, its goods receipt to unrestricted stock with stock indicator as K, later you can take to your own stock through 411k.
4. No invoice verification done, but settlement is done through MRKO transaction. Is it paid consigment fees to vendor by this t-code? What's the accounting happened?
For example If you manage material A of vendor X as consignment stock at a price of $ 10 /piece.
When 100 pieces are withdrawn for consumption, the system makes the following
postings when the withdrawal is settled:
During Withdrawal
Consumption account                               1000 +
Liabilities from consignment stores            1000 -
During Settlement
Liabilities from consignment stores   1000 +
Vendor account                                1000 -
For your scenario 2, follow the same steps as mentioned above and do the goods issue directly from consignment stock.
You can do the settlement to vendor only for the stocks that you consumed.
Regards,
Prabu
Edited by: prabu krishnasamy on Apr 25, 2009 12:13 PM
Edited by: prabu krishnasamy on Apr 25, 2009 12:14 PM

SRM Process Controlled Workflow Issue - Process Level Agent not shown up

System: SRM 7.0 (SP09)
Implemented BADI to determine agents at process level - BADI Definition /SAPSRM/BD_WF_PROCESS_CONFIG
Configuration: 1 Process Level (Seq 100, Lvl Type A, Resp. Resolver Name: Z_XXXXXX, Task ID 40007954, Decision Type 1)
When creating the Shopping cart based on the cart value, the agents are determined correctly and process level GUID is created with Agent ID associated.
something like
GUID1 - APPR1
GUID2 - APPR2
GUID3 - APPR3
GUID4 - APPR4
Before "Order" when we do preview of Approval Process, it shows all the approvers in the sequence as expected. As soon as the cart is ordered, the first process level GUID lost its agent thus throwing error saying "Strategy Z_XXXXXX did not determine any approver"
But when we look at the table /SAPSRM/D_WF_016, the corresponding entires of GUID1 has the agent ID as APPR1.
The task 40007954 has been GENERALIZED so as the master workflow template 40000014. The same is working in our Dev system but throwing error "Strategy Z_XXXXXX did not determine any approver" in QA system.
Any input is highly appreciated.

See the thing is the agents were picked up & saved in the table /SAPSRM/D_WF_016 in the process level BADI. The first process level guid doesn't get processed in the RESP_RESOLVER BADI. I put the break point and can see the agents were picked up & saved in Process Level BADI.
The funny part is it is working just fine in the Dev system. Secondly, when we do BOB for the same user (requester), it picks up the first level approver without the error.
Meaning, If USER1 shops for himself (Creator & Requester are same), we encounter this error. If USER2 shops for USER1, then the corresponding approvers were picked up correctly without the error. USER1 & USER2 have same authorizations in SU01D (USER2 is copy of USER1, so no authorization issues). Approvers determination is based on the requester.
Somewhere, we miss the settings. Don't know where though.

Process memory leak issue solaris 10

I have a process which has a memory leak issue. I ran this process on solaris 9 as well as solaris 10. When i run prstat command i get a different output for two. Funny thing is that memory leak noted in solaris 10 is much more than that in solaris 9 e.g if it is 1 MB in solaris 9 then its 4 MB in solaris 10.
What can be possibly causing this ? Is this related to kernel implementation on diff solaris ?

I have a process which has a memory leak issue. I ran this process on solaris 9 as well as solaris 10. When i run prstat command i get a different output for two. Funny thing is that memory leak noted in solaris 10 is much more than that in solaris 9 e.g if it is 1 MB in solaris 9 then its 4 MB in solaris 10.
What can be possibly causing this ? Is this related to kernel implementation on diff solaris ?

Process chain tranporting issue

Hi,
I have creaeted a process chain and it is working fine in Development.
Now I have created a transport request in Transport connection and collected the relative objects (like Infopacakges, DTPs ,Varients etc)and released it to Quality..
Now in Quality..
I )..I could not see the chain in Display mode.. Once I turn to Change, I can see it.
2) Everything is transported correctly. But there are duplicated in DTPs. Each process has duplicate DTPs..
I dont know where I am wrong. This is my first time transporting Process chains...
Thanks in advance
Manu

Hi Arun,
... But my client wants to be transported without any changes in Quality and Production. As per the requirement it has to be transported.
also Please write in detail....I did not understaand your first sentence..
my issues are:
1. It is showing 2 DTPs in Quality ..actually it should be one
2. Process chain not visible in Display mode.. only Change mode it is visisble...
Thanks
Manu

Process Order Deletion issue.

Dear PP/SAP Master,
Good Day. I encounter one issue as below:
Standard SAP will create the reservation based on dependent requirement once there's process order created.
Example Raw Material are used in FG PO , Raw Material will in reservation when FG PO created.
If the Process Order flag for deletion , the stock from reservation will move back to unrestricted.
There's one issue , after i deleted the FG Process order but the Raw material in reservation are not move back to unrestricted.
Kindly Please if anyone know how this can happen.
thank you.

Dear ,
Frist of all , technically , you can set deletion flag for process order when this order is finicially setteled within FY periods , Technically complete from production [TECO] , Final Goods Issue indicator is set [GMPS] , Operations are confirmed [CNF] and Goods Delivery completed [DLV]
Or , you should reverse all of them .If it is not settled so far by FICO , then reverse TECO [CO02-FUNCTION-Revock TECO] , Reverse Goods Receiept -102 -MIGO ,Reverse Goods Issue -262-MIGO , Reverse Confirmation -CO13 and then you can set deletion Flag .
If you set deletion flag prior to that , stock will not move back to unrestricted stock .Settting deeltion flag does not mean you have deleted the PO rather it is an entry to SAP tabel for Process Order .
Regards
JH

GRC AC 5.3 Application Issue

Hi everybody,
i hope you can help me,
I have a DL360 HP Server in which it is installed the components for GRC AC 5.3 with Win2003 server.
The issue is that the server not respond after 1 day approximately. I try to use capacities (ERM, RAR, etc...) and they not respond, i mean, first i can work normally, but passed approximatelly 1 day, it´s dead, the web pages don´t respond.
I see the event viewer and performance but they not show any problem, just some warnings, therefore is not server or OS problem.
When i see the SAPMMC console, in the corresponding tree of instance currentstatus/<SID>:
/kernel/Application threads pool/Minimumthreadpoolsize module is in red color.
/kernel/Application threads pool/WaitingtaskQueueoverflow is in yellow color.
/services/JMX Adpater/ObjectNameCache/MaxEntries is in red color.
/servides/JMX Adpater/ReplacedEntries is in red color,
¿What is the problem?
¿Do you know how and where look the log files to see the application problem?
Regards,

Hi Ricardo,
If you are running in a 64-bit environment - increase heap size to min 2GB.
Note 1121978 - Recommended settings to improve peformance risk analysis
Verify settings in J2EE Config Tool per SAP Note 723909.
Verify Settings in Visual Administrator:
> Server Node
> Services
> JDBC Connector
> Properties
Datasource name should = SAP<SID>DB (J2EE schema)sysDS.maximum connections should be 50
In Risk Analysis and Remediation go to WebDynpro > Content Administrator
> Maintain JCo Connectors
o Check Virsa Metadata and Model for all connectors.
Verify that max pool is set to 50.
Verify that max connection is set to 100.
Verify time out is seconds is 10. (msecs = 10,000)
Verify wait time in seconds is 30. (msecs = 30,000)
In Risk Analysis and Remediation Configuration > Performance Tuning
Batch size for users should be 1,000
RFC Time out should be 1441
Web Service worker: 5
Job worker: 3
//vit

Process chain transport issue: variant

Hi xperts!
I've an issue regarding incomplete transports of process chain variants.
I've maintained the variant description & the recipient list.
When the request is imported in QAS, I'm missing the details of the variants. QAS-table RSPCVARIANTT is empty regarding type MAIL.
In addition the recipients 've not been imported too.
How can I transport the missing settings?
Pls. give an advice. Txs a lot in advance.
Hermann

Hi,
would suggest you to go by this..
in the RSPC t-code go to the chain you want to transport and activate each step and sub chain if any...firsy and store it in a temporary request ....and then click on the truck button the top.....it will take you to the transport connection and there you can see obnjects are still in temp TR.
delee these TR now refresh the window of transport connection and you will see that it's not present in any TR now.
once done just select the main chain and then again create TR.
this time you can see it contains all the objects.
try to keep only necessary objects and delete all the unwanted objects from that.
Thanks

Process and Forms - Issue with Method which Uses Imported Form Values

We are doing a project to implement ESS and MSS. Using Adobe Process and Forms we generated a process with form and workflow.
The workflow's first step uses a version of TS17900110 task to move the form to the workflow container.
Binding:
export:
&FORM_STANDARD& @0E\QAssign Value@ @9T\QGets data for...@ &FORM&
'USER_ID' @0E\QAssign Value@ @9T\QGets data for...@ &FORM_FIELD_NAME_1&
'PERNR' @0E\QAssign Value@ @9T\QGets data for...@ &FORM_FIELD_NAME_2&
'AWART' @0E\QAssign Value@ @9T\QGets data for...@ &FORM_FIELD_NAME_3&
Binding
import:
&EMPL_USERID.OBJID& @9S\QReceives data from...@ @0D\QAssign Value@ &FORM_FIELD_VALUE_1&
&PERNR& @9S\QReceives data from...@ @0D\QAssign Value@ &FORM_FIELD_VALUE_2&
&AWART& @9S\QReceives data from...@ @0D\QAssign Value@ &FORM_FIELD_VALUE_3&
The workflow is bringing values for: EMPL_USERID, PERNR, AWART.
We need to write these field values to a table using a method. We are using a custom task to do this.
The task triggers a method which calls a FM which makes the update to the table.
The step with the custom task is a foreground step which the workflow stops for so we can test execute it.
When we execute there is a breakpoint in the ABAP code which stopps us at the point where the values are being read.
We are trying to read values: 'USER_ID', 'PERNR', and 'AWART' but the debugger is not showing any values being brought in.
The binding we currently have for the step we feel is the problem:
This is all we have in there so far - NEED suggestions/advice:
Binding export:
&ZABSREQ&     @0E\QAssign Value@     @9T\QGets data for...@     &_WI_OBJECT_ID&
(&ZABSREQ& - This is a BOR)
Any information is appreciated.
alicia.morante at gmail.com
alicia.morante at us.army.mil
Edited by: Alicia Morante on Jan 23, 2012 8:43 PM

We were very anxious to solve this issue.
While I was posting my counterpart realized that we did not have target containers setup to receive the values from the workflow.
Once those were set the values were able to be read from the FM.
Here's the binding updated to:
&EMPL_NUM&     @0E\QAssign Value@     @9T\QGets data for...@     &EMPL_NUM&
&SUBTYPE&     @0E\QAssign Value@     @9T\QGets data for...@     &SUBTYPE&
Still gave you some points for helping - Thank you.

Error when generate a new version for MSMP Process ID

Helly guys, again,
     I have created a new custom workflow.
     When I am trying to test the new workflow i have some errors: Incorect path and stage entry for process XXX.
    Can you help me?
Thank you,
Ovidiu

Hi,
I checked :
1) I have rules generated for my process id.
2) Route mapping
3)
4) Agent ID
Did I forgot something? When I try to generate my process, I have the same error(described before in my first post).
Can you please help me? I am a "poor" developer with no "coaching help" in customizing the MSMP workflow

Windows Process Activation (WAS) Issue

Good Afternoon All,
I'm very new to UPK and am learning through the documentations. I have a server (windows 2003 R2 SP2). I want to install server component of the UPK on it and Client on my local machine (is that a right thing). Secondly when i tried to install (Server or Server and Client) on the Windows 2003 machine i'm getting the following error "Setup cannot determine if windows process activation service (WAS) and world wide web publishing are installed on the computer. Confirm that windows Process Activation Service (WAS) and World Wide Web Publishing are installed and running on the computer". Can anyone please help me?
Thanks

Hello thinkingeye,
The most likely reason you are experiencing this issue is because Windows Server 2003 is no longer supported by our latest version of UPK (it is also no longer supported by Microsoft).
Please see the technical requirements for our latest version of UPK, 12.1:
http://www.oracle.com/us/products/applications/tutor-upk/oracleupk-techspecs12-1-2186665.pdf
Thanks
Tom Casillas
UPK Technical Support

Process Chain schedulin issue

hi .
When scheduling Process chain to run periodically on daily basis we found an issue. If process chain is scheduled to run daily at 00:00:10 from 2/8/07 onwards.It's released the job at 00:00:10 from 3/8/07.
It means it's moving job to next day from schedule date when it is scheduled to run between 00:00:10 to 01:45:00
If we schedule it to run daily at 01:50:00 from 2/8/07 then it's releasing job at same date and time which is correct?
Is it because of any Basis setting

Hi Rupesch
This happen sometimes when you activate for the first time the chain, I m not sure why, but we had the same issue in our 7.0
Anyway, you can solve that, after you schedule your chain, go to your start variant,/see "all jobs" / and change the job from sm37.
Hope this help you

GRC MSMP Process ID SAP_GRAC_ROLE_APPR issue

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for