GRE and Tax Group

Could somebody share your experiences on 'Tax Group' Functionality? We have acquired a new company and need to maintain Tax group since we have to convert FICA, SSmax and stuff. In a way w2 should show 2 GRE for an employee and together the max amount should be met. Any suggestions/leads are most welcome
Thanks

Did you ever receive a response to your posted questions?
Thanks.

Similar Messages

AP Tax Calculation issue with SINGLE TAX vs TAX GROUP

Hi Gurus,
i need your help on below, please advise!!
i have to calculate ap VAT tax on AP invoice,
(Rounding = nearest, precession=2, tax calcualtion= Include tax)
if i calculate 5% is the tax rate, then the tax amount is 0.47cents,this is in case of single tax calculation.
here my requirement was i need calculate 2 Taxes(TAX A AND TAX B (Rates are 5 AND 5%)
EG:
Invoce Base amount = 10 dollars
in case of single tax = 5/105 * 10 = 0.4761 cents(this is 48cents in apps with rouning nearest and precession 2)
tax mode = Include tax
In case of tax group = Tax A and Tax B = 5 + 5 = 10%, when i calculate this in apps its showing 45cents and 45 cents as tax A and B
why this tax caluclation is different with single tax and tax group.
tax code actual amount tax amount remaining amount
single tax 10 0.4761 10 - 0.48cents = 9.52 cents
tax group 10 45+45=90 cents 9.10 cents
Please Help !!!
Thanks,
Satish

Hi Vineeth,
This is Kathy from BSI Support. I wanted to make sure that you understood that the TF80 Like Reciprocal flag was made available in TF90 for testing purposes only. This was meant as a tool for customers to be able to compare their TF90 results to their TF80 output, to insure a successful upgrade. This funcitonality, however, was never intended to be utilized going forward. There have been significant changes implemented in BSI TaxFactory 9.0 regarding multi-state withholding (also known as reciprocity). There is information available on our website that explains these changes. If you log onto our website, please look under the "Whats New" section for an explanation of reciprocal functionality in BSI TaxFactoryu2122 9.0
If you have specific scenarios that you need help with, please contact us and we will be happy to assist you.
Regards,
BSI Support - Kathy

Professional tax grouping change in mid of the year

Dear All,
In my company, i have to change professional tax grouping in mid of the year for few personnel area.
For the month of april, may and june professional tax deducted as per the gujarat state and from july onwards it should be deduct as per the maharastra state. I have assigned the maharastra state professiona tax grouping to that personnel area in table V_7IN0P_PTX. Now my issue is that when i run the july payroll, system calculate the professional tax carry forward of previous months.
could any one provide the solution for the same.
Thanks,
Jyoti Patel

Hi Jyoti,
Look into the config. of following tables.
V_T7INP1
V_T7INP3
V_T7INP4
What you are getting the professional tax deductions in the july months simulation run.
if any..let us know.
V sai.

Excise modvat accounts not defined for DLFC transaction and excise group

Dear Experts,
Iam raising this question after checking all the contents related to Sub Transaction type in SDN.
My prob is: for raw material sales scenario i have created order delivery and invoice. For Invoice i have done account determination with a different G/L in VKOA. Now i have to create an excise invoice and the accounting entry for central ED on sales should go to different G/L account. for account determination i have done the following settings:
Maintained Sub transaction type in
IMG -> Logistics - General -> Tax on Goods movement -> India -> Basic Settings
->Maintain Sub Transaction types
IMG -> Logistics - General -> Tax on Goods movement -> India ->
Account determination -> Specify Excise Accounts per Excise Transaction.
Here against DLFC sub transaction Type is maintained..
Also
IMG -> Logistics - General -> Tax on Goods movement -> India -> Account determination -> Specify G/L Accounts per Excise Transaction
Here maintained Excise group with DLFC Company Code subtransaction type, chart of accounts and all required GL Account .
But when the iam creating Excise Invoice in J1IIN and clicking on Subtransaction type-F4, no entries are shown. No values found is the message in green. Message no. DH801
If i use subtransaction type and enter billing document and enter, the following error message comes:
"Excise modvat accounts not defined for DLFC transaction and excise group"
Iam unable to understand why the subtransaction type maintained is not showing in TCODE J1IIN?
Regards

For the error message DH801, please check note 840911
Excise modvat accounts not defined for
DLFC transaction and excise group"
Please check your G/L assignments "Specify G/L Accounts per Excise Transaction"
thanks
G. Lakshmipathi

Plant to Plant STO with excise invoice and taxes in one company code

Hi,
I have a new business requirement, we want to create only one company code and 12 plants in different states, each plant will have separate purchasing and sales activity this is ok this can be done with separate excise and series group as ther will not be any issue for purchsing and saling of materisl with exice in each plant , but how we can transfer the material plant to plant if the plant is in different states we want that the material should be transfer from palnt to plant with excise invoice only, as we have the company code common, how to create the billing document for this, and how to pass the duty from the saling plant and capture the same in the recieving plant. with proper tax entry. Can we do the STO with biiling if the two plants are in single compnay code.
regards,
zafar

hi,
I am trying to create a Stock Transport Order (STO) with document type UB and item category U. My objective is to transfer material from Plant (supplying plant) 100 to Plant (receiving plant) 1100 within one company code (1000) with STO.
For this purpose I created a raw material 1434 in plant 1000 with sales org 1 view and in that view entered in delivering plant field 1000 as delivery plant. After that I extended material 1434 to plant 1100 without changing anything what I did while creating the material first in Plant 1000 except in organizational level I entered 1100 in the plant field. I entered Sales org 1000 and distribution channel 10 in organization level for both plant while creating and extending the material. In me21n I chose Stock Transport Order with document type UB and item category as U also receiving Plant as 1100. With this when I tried to save the STO the message, I am getting an error, Cannot determine shipping data for the material 1434?
I am doing solely mm function why I need to create Customer master? In this case plant 1100 is the customer right?
Solution:
1. Mat.(1434) should be maintained in both the plants. (1000&1100).
2. Should have enough stock in supplying plant(1000).
3. Make its supplying plant as a vendor in vendor master record in receiving plant(1100).
4. Make it receiving plant as a customer in customization.
    Create customer (xd01) & and define the shipping data for plants in both the plants.
    Path: spro u2013 img u2013 m.mgmt u2013 purchasing u2013 po u2013 set up STO u2013 define shipping data (1 by1 )
    In Receiving plant (1100)                         In Supplying plant (1000)
    Customer num. 123345 (for ex.)              Customer num. -
(don't fill)
    Sales org.yyy
    Dist. Channel
    Sales div. y
5. Assign doc. Type is "NL" for intra company STO. If STO is inter company, Assign doc. Type is "NLCC".
    Position doc type is "UB"
    Enter supplying plant(1000) & doc type (NL) & checking rule (ex:01)
6. Assign doc. Type is "UB" to u'r plants.(PO)
    Go for new entries
    Enter supplying plant(1000) & Receiving plant (1100) & doc type (UB).
7. Create a PO, choose the doc type is `UB' & item cat.'U', Enter supplying plant as a vendor in PO of the receiving plant(1100).
8. Provide this num (PO) to SD people, they will do the delivery by using transactional code is VL10B.
9. Sales people they will provide "out bound delivery num".
10. Do the GR. In GR the second tab 05 out bound delivery instead of PO mov.type 101.
11. See the stock over view in the receiving & supplying plants.
thanking you

Unable to calculate required tax using compounding tax codes in a tax group

Dear All,
My requirement for an ordered item (Sale order/Invoice) is to apply VAT on "discounted price" and then apply advance tax on "sum of List price and VAT calculated before".
Example:
List Price=100;
Net selling Price after 10% disount=90;
VAT Rate:16%;
Adv. Tax Rate: 0.5%
I have performed following steps for this:
Separate tax codes made for these taxes For VAT-used taxable basis="after discount", whereas for Adv.tax="before discount",
and then assigned these codes to a tax group to be applied to the oredered item.
But system is not calcuating adv. tax as per my requirement and rather applying rate on "sum of discounrted price and VAT calculated before".
Kindly provide the workaround for this.
Regards,

Dear All,
My requirement for an ordered item (Sale order/Invoice) is to apply VAT on "discounted price" and then apply advance tax on "sum of List price and VAT calculated before".
Example:
List Price=100;
Net selling Price after 10% disount=90;
VAT Rate:16%;
Adv. Tax Rate: 0.5%
I have performed following steps for this:
Separate tax codes made for these taxes For VAT-used taxable basis="after discount", whereas for Adv.tax="before discount",
and then assigned these codes to a tax group to be applied to the oredered item.
But system is not calcuating adv. tax as per my requirement and rather applying rate on "sum of discounrted price and VAT calculated before".
Kindly provide the workaround for this.
Regards,

Maintaing Tax Groups in the Table CRMC_TAX_GROUP

Hi All
In order to download Materials from ECC to CRM2007 via Middleware, I need to maintain the Tax Groups in the Table CRMC_TAX_GROUP and then assignt the Tax Types to the ECC Tax Classifications.
However, I am unable to add entries to the table CRMC_TAX_GROUP either through SE16 or SM30.
I am only able to run the report in Data Browser (SE16) in display mode. When I try to maintian the table using sm30, I get the following Exit Message:
Check maintenance object CRMC_TAX_GROUP or update
function group CRM_PRSALESTAX_C
I request your help and suggestions in this regard.
Thanks in advance.
Regards
Chaitanya

Hi,
You can maintain that table using a maintainence view 'CRMV_TAX_GROUP' in sm30.
Thanks
Swagatika

Purchase tax group

Hi Experts,
In purchase order and AP Invoice i wanna put purchase tax group (item/service) as empty, but system is no allow. is it any setting for this? I'm using 2005A PL50.
Thanks.
Regards,
Danny

Hi Danny,
Your question belongs to the Core forum. It is not related to system administration.
To answer your question: Tax group must not be empty. This is by system design. You may create a tax group with 0 rate in case you need 0 tax.
Thanks,
Gordon

Excise modvat accounts not defined for CEIV transaction and excise group`

Dear All,
During outgoing excise cancellation i am getting the massage
`Excise modvat accounts not defined for CEIV transaction and excise group`
I have checked the following,
GL is assigned in excise account determination.
the transection type CEIV is assigned to account field cenvat sup.
Please put some light on this issue.
Thanks in advance.
deepti

Dear Deepti
Follow the IMG Path.
Logistics-General --> Tax on Goods Movements --> India --> Account Determination --> Specify Excise Accounts per Excise Transaction.
Here you have to define respective G/L accounts for "Excise Transaction Type CEIV". Check with your FI Guy if you have any clarification.
Thanks
G. Lakshmipathi

REMITTANCE CHALLAN AND NUMBER GROUP

Dear Friends,
Can any body throw some light on how to maintain number group of remittance challan, whether it is Section code wise or with holding tax type wise?
Section code       with hodking tax type          number group
1000                            194c                                  01
1000                            194a                                  02
1000                             194i                                   03
or
Section code       with hodking tax type          number group
1000                            194c                                  01
2000                            194a                                  02
3000                             194i                                   03
Please revert.
Regards,
Saandeep

Dear Friends,
We have 26 section codes and number group, so shall we define 26*5 = 130 Number groups?
where system may not accept number group up to 99 only how can we move ahead in these case, the same number groupis repeated to multiple setion code.
Is it correct to assign same number group to multiple section code, means when two different section codes with same Number group means same number rnge was sharing by two section codes.
Is it correct?
Please guide me
sandeep

Acquisition tax group cannot be used this way

Dear Experts,
I'm trying to generate a Journal Entry using SBO 2007 SP01 using 2 accounts.
When I click on create boutton I get the following error message:
DSC1 - The acquisition tax group cannot be used this way for this transaction - Message 200-48.
Could you please tell me whu do I get this error and cannot create the JE?
Thanks a lot for your help.
Kind regards,
Walid.

Dear Gordon,
I desactivated the SP and the result is always the same.
Do you know what does this message concretely mean?
Thanks for your help.
Walid.

Unused Tax Group Deletion

Hi
In our existing SAP system, we have five tax groups and we have assigned four tax groups to PA , PSA.
But the last tax group Eg. 5 its not assigned for any PA and PSA. So customer want to delete the unused tax group.
So here, if we delete that, what will be the impact? it may affect any payroll results?
I need help for resolving this issue.
Regards,
Srinivas.S

Hi Mahesh
Thanks for your reply, here i have a doubt, coz now we are doing configuration in the existing live system. So where we can check like wherther this Tax group is preveiously used or not. Coz as of now its not mapped to any PA but i want to know in history level.
Thanks & Regards,
Srinivas.S

5002 Tax group account is missing

I'm using the DI Server to add invoices, and I suddenly get "-5002 Tax group account is missing" whenever I try to make an invoice. What's strange, is that this occures only on one of my SAP-databases, whereas the others are ok. Luckily it's in a testbase. I'm pretty sure this database worked before, so I suspect someone has done something in the base. Does anyone know what generates this error, so that I can fix it?
Here is my code:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-16"?>
<env:Envelope xmlns:env="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/">
<env:Header>
<SessionID>8956830C-D03A-24EA-94A6-838A5E4EEA02</SessionID>
</env:Header>
<env:Body>
<dis:AddObject xmlns:dis="http://www.sap.com/SBO/DIS">
<BOM>
<BO>
<AdmInfo>
<Object>oInvoices</Object>
</AdmInfo>
<Documents>
<row>
<CardCode>K99999</CardCode>
<NumAtCard>11311A 14:00</NumAtCard>
<Comments>11311A 14:00</Comments>
<SalesPersonCode>126</SalesPersonCode>
<U_DepartmentId>15</U_DepartmentId>
<U_Nettbank>0</U_Nettbank>
</row>
</Documents>
<Document_Lines>
<row>
<ItemCode>100312</ItemCode>
<Quantity>1.0</Quantity>
<UnitPrice>0.8</UnitPrice>
<TaxCode>U1</TaxCode>
<CostingCode>15</CostingCode>
</row>
</Document_Lines>
</BO>
</BOM>
</dis:AddObject>
</env:Body>
</env:Envelope>
And the reply:
<?xml version="1.0"?><env:Envelope xmlns:env="http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap-envelope"><env:Body><env:Fault><env:Code><env:Value>env:Receiver</env:Value><env:Subcode><env:Value>-5002</env:Value></env:Subcode></env:Code><env:Reason><env:Text xml:lang="en">Tax group account is missing </env:Text></env:Reason><env:Detail><Object>13</Object><ObjectIndex>1</ObjectIndex><Command>AddObject</Command><SessionID>8956830C-D03A-24EA-94A6-838A5E4EEA02</SessionID></env:Detail></env:Fault></env:Body></env:Envelope>

Hi Runar,
This error occurs because the last line you are trying to add to the Marketing Document is an empty line. The document object automatically comes with one document line. It is only for the second and subsequent lines of marketing documents that you require the method oDocument.Lines.Add
So, don't Add new line for the first item.
If Satisfied give me rewards points...
Regards
Yogesh

JE Tax Group

Hi
In the Tax group I have C1, P1 and S1. This is the order as it display in Administration > Setup > Financial > Tax > Tax Group.
I have defaulted tax group in G/L Account Inventry to P1 ( Chart of Accounts > Assests > Inventry > Account Details > Default VAT group as P1 )
But every time I add Inventry G/L acount and it select C1 as the default tax group in jearnal Entry.
Is there any way to change the default value. I am using SAP 2007 A.
Thanks
Sanjaya

Hi Sanjaya,
I had checked your query in SBO 2007A PL:46.
I tried the same kind of scenario - mapped a Default VAT Group for a G/L account and selected this G/L account in journal entry along with "Automatic Tax" option checked.
In the Tax Group of Journal entry automatically the defaul VAT Group that I have set for the G/L account only comes.
Is there any thing I missed to understand your question?
Best Regards
Satish

BPC v7 for Legal and Tax Consolidation

We need to save data by year using the legal organization structure and currency rates in place in that year. It needs to be saved for at least 11 years for annual report purposes and tax audit purposes. There are over 2000 entities including parents in any one years org structure. Has anyone dealt with large entity hierarchies saved for multiple years? What is the best way to handle a situation like this. I know that in Hypereion Enterprise you can consolidate different years data with different organization structures but I am not sure that BPC can handle this.

SAP BPC's Legal consolidation provides for this very issues. If you can have a look at the IFRS Starter kit for BPC 7.0, it has already the org structure that can change from period to period. The actual hierarchy itself does not change over time, but the way its consolidated is driver by an application called Ownership in which group structures can be defined.
This will allow you to define structures that are impossible to represent in a traditional hierarchy, eg Joint venture owned by a company's two subsidiaries.
In the IFRS Kit, there is documentation describing how consolidation works in this way.
This same functionality is available in both MS and NW version.

GRE and Tax Group

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for