GRN Amount Zero

Hi All,
*I have created a PO in which I have made two line items Items.
(1)     Line item one has one asset so I put one asset number. The account assignment tab is showing following things
(a)     Distribution as Single Account Assignment
(b)     Partial Inv as Derive from account assignment
(c)     When I do GRN the value is showing.
(2)     Mine item two has 7 asset and have put all the asset numbers. The account assignment tab is showing following things.
(a) Distribution as distribution on quantity basis.
(b) Partial Inv as Distribute proportionally.
(c) When I do GRN the amount in LC is showing zero.
Why is it so Please explain as I m explained.
T. & R.,
S.Singh

Please let me know whether the LC is showing zero or there has been no accounting document generated?...coz in standard SAP if a MIGO against a PO line item having multiple account assignment then no Accounting doc gets generated...Please correct me if i am wrong
Regards,
Indranil

Similar Messages

Not to save customer order if net amount zero

Dear Gurus,
I want SAP not to save customer order if net amount = zero .
How can I do it by customizing?
Kind Regards,

Hi,
Include VBAK-NETWR field and screen as KKON in the incompletion procedure in T.Code:OVA2
Tick the check box IC Dialog while assigning incompletion procedure to sales document type in T.Code: VUA2
System will nto allow the sales order to save if Net value field is Zero.
Hope this helps.
Regards,
Sharan

Query leaving action to make wage type amount zero

000010            D OUTWPMASSN
000020 H6
000030 N            ADDWT *
000040 Y            AMT=1085 RTE=0      MULTI ARAADDWT *
I am querying my action type H6 and H7 leaving action in PCR ZCC. PIT ZCCC    NOAB. When i am running payroll it is giving error no rule in PCR ZCCC for ****1085 where 1085 is my wage type for which i am writing this rule so that in leavaing action amount should become zero.   Can u please guide where to correc tule. Also i want to add one more action type H7 in this rule.

Hi all
System is splitting the last period into two wpbp splits. One split is for period employee was with company and second split is for unemployment period during the leaving month. So whenever we write a rule or query it, then the rule is applied with ** once and leving action second time. So two different splits are there and both conditions are taken by system. so for the part of month in which leaving action has taken place like 15 to 30th then the amount is becoming zero but for the first part the system is taking ** value which is addwt *, so that amount is not beingmade zero. how can i make the period for first half as zero.

AP credit memo for AP invoice but applied amount zero

Hi all!
I have problem when i use function AP credit memo for AP invoice. IN AP invoice, i have status closed and Applied equal total value of AP invoice.
In AP credit memo, i still have Status is Closed but applied amount is zero and open Balance is equal total value of AP invoice.
I don't understand how why system show this.
Please tell me advice.
My figure: [http://i720.photobucket.com/albums/ww201/tiencruise/tien.jpg]
Thanks!

Hi,
Please check whether the AP Invoice and the Credit Memo is appearing in the Business Partner Internal Reconciliation window.
Check the Note : 1258628 and check whether the detect query returns any result for the same.
Please make sure that you perform the following in the COPY of the database in TEST ENVIORMENT :
If you have the COPY of the database available, you can test by reconciling the documents in the Internal Reconciliation window and then run the detect query in the Note 1258628 and see whether now the documents appear or not.
Kind Regards,
Jitin
SAP Business One Forum Team

Error in GRN amount

Hi SAP Gurus,
I have an issue as GRN is created for PO but instead of taking the value of PO, it took some other value.
PO with PO qty 904.10 EA with value as 187 EUR, GRN created of 22.980 qty and system picked 4,3 EUR.
This happened for few GRN and other GRN are with correct value which were created with partial qty.
When asked to reverse the GRN which were of wrong value ,system picked som eother value of same qty i.e 22.980 EA of 3,742.69 EUR.
Unable to understand what is the problem, why and how it happened.
PO is with account assignment category 'F'.
Waiting for the positive reply.

Hi,
Thanks for your explanation , but here after GRN Invoice is being posted.
PO is with account assignment category as " F " , so no Quanity or value updated in accounting view.
PO is of 904.01 qty of 187 EUR EA.
We can view the total consumption period wise only.
My query is:
GRN is with value 4.30 ,4.29 and 4.26 EUR on 3rd feb 2012 as posting date and of 4.30 EUR on 7th feb 201 of qty 22.98 , 22.94 , 22.78 and 23.08 EA respectively but when these are reversed the value it picked are 3,742.69 , 3,736.17 , 3,710.11 , and 3,749.20 on 8th Feb 2012 respectively.
Other dated GRN are correct picking correct value as per PO i.e. 187 EUR per qty.
How come there is huge difference while posting the GRN and reversing the same?
As I know GRN is created with the value of PO and if there is other currency it converts according to the exchange rate of that day.
As PO is ordered in EUR only , so why system picked sonominal amount at the time of GRN and when reversed the same GRN how it picked some other value?
Kindly help?
Thanks & Regards.

Hiding Zero amount

Hi,
I m developing ALV using oops. i dont want to display the amount as zero if it is.
Instead of displaying zero i should display as blank.I have achieved this be wa_fcat-inttype = 'N'.
Also, i should show the total amonut. for this i said wa_fcat-do_sum = 'X'.
but as soon as i do sum, it shows me the o/p for amount zero also. my requirenemt is to print blank if the amount is zero and show total as well.
Please help.

Hi
See this
Identification
 fieldname (field name)
value set: internal output table field name (required parameter)
Name of the internal output table field which is described by this field catalog entry
 tabname (internal output table)
value set: SPACE, internal output table name
This parameter is used in 'manual' field catalog build-up only for hierarchical-sequential lists.
Name of the internal output table which contains the field FIELDCAT-FIELDNAME.
Data Dictionary reference
 ref_fieldname (reference field name)
value set: SPACE, Data Dictionary field name
Name of the Data Dictionary field referred to.
This parameter is only used when the internal output table field described by the current field catalog entry has a reference to the Data Dictionary (not a program field), and the field name in the internal output table is different from the name of the field in the Data Dictionary. If the field names are identical, naming the Data Dictionary structure or table in the FIELDCAT-REF_TABNAME parameter is sufficient.
 ref_tabname (reference table/structure field name)
value set: SPACE, name of a Data Dictionary structure or table
Structure or table name of the referred Data Dictionary field.
This parameter is only used when the internal output table field described by the current field catalog entry has a Data Dictionary reference (not a program field).
Reference to fields with currency/measurement unit
Each internal output table sum or quantity field whose decimal places are to be formatted appropriately for the unit in the list must follow the convention:
 the field is of data type QUAN or CURR (internal type P) (the field must really have this physical data type. Overwriting the physical data type with the parameter FIELDCAT-DATATYPE has no effect)
 There is a field in the internal output table which contains the associated unit.
 There is also an entry in the field catalog for the unit field.
(If the unit is not to appear as a column in the list, and cannot be interactively displayed as a column, e.g. because it is always unambiguous and is therefore explicitly output by the caller in the list header, the field catalog units field entry can take the parameter FIELDCAT-TECH = 'X'.
The association of a value field to a unit affects the output as follows:
 appropriate decimal places display for the unit
 an initialized field with a link to a non-initial unit is output as '0' for the unit (if FIELDCAT-NO_ZERO is initial). When this field is summed, this unit affects whether the units are homogeneous.
 an initialized field with a link to an initial unit is output as SPACE. When this field is summed, the unit SPACE does not affect the homogeneity of the units.
 When non-initial fields with an initial unit are summed, the unit SPACE is considered to be a unit.
Link to currency unit
 cfieldname (currency unit field name)
value set: SPACE, output table field name
Only relevant for amount columns with associated unit.
Name of the internal output table field containing the currency unit associated with the amount field FIELDCAT-FIELDNAME. The field in FIELDCAT-CFIELDNAME must have its own field catalog entry.
 ctabname (internal currency unit field output table)
value set: SPACE, output table field name
only relevant for hierarchical-sequential lists
Name of the internal output table containing the FIELDCAT-CFIELDNAME field.
Reward points for useful Answers
Regards
Anji

Changing Withholding tax base amount- 1099 payment

The scenario is:
Classic withholding tax functionality to be used for first time, the configuration was done last year.
1099 needs to be printed with all payments made out to the vendor.
There were payments made out to the Vendor in year 2011. There are some payments that show as WT exempt amount in RC and other payments are displayed as WT base amount in RC while running RFIDYYWT or 1099 print out report.
I used RFWT0020 program to regenerate the WT and Change to source tax code. It just updates the tax code on the payment document but is not changing the payment document amount from WT exempt to WTax base.
So the 1099 printout is not showing the total payments made, it is excluding WT exempt amount in total.
Any suggestions?
Thanks
Edited by: Gary_S321 on Jan 11, 2012 10:30 PM

Rebecca,
You need to update the WTax base amount field on all the payment documents that are blank.
For that just go to Vendor line item report FBL1n and run it for all the 1099 vendors. Change the layput to add WT base amount and WT Code in the report output. Filter the documennt type with payment doc types ZP and KZ and WTax base amount zero.
Extract these transactions into excel and then write LSMW to mass update these tax base amount field.
To update only Tax code on these transaction you can use RFWT0020 program.
Hope this helps.
Thanks

Query invoice booking

Hi All,
Freight/ Transportation charges amount has been added as a line item in PO.
When goods are received, along with other line items, GRN for this line item also is being done (i.e. for transportation charges)
But when FI team posts invoice, they are manipulating with the QTY & Amount (in order to match near by value/amount of vendor invoice) for this line item
Resulting in invoice qty is more than GRN qty and invoice amount is less than GRN amount.
In PO history tab, against invoice receipt document (IR-L), I can see GR/IR clearing value (which is not equal to zero, as compared to GRN document (GRSR)).
If I do GRN to match with invoice qty, system is not allowing to do so, and throwing an error message of u201Cinvoice qty more than GRN qtyu201D.
I want to short close the PO line. I had told to reverse the invoice documents so as the invoice qty will match GRN qty. But I think amount, will not match as there is a huge difference between GRN amount and invoice amount.
Or there is any alternate method.
I hope every one understood my query, now, what I should do. Please suggest.
Thanks in advance.

Hi,
Thank you for your previous psot.
what about if payments are made to the vendor, will it effect the PO.
Should i cancle the excess iinvoiced qty , so as to match with GRN qty and then perform MR11.
After doing MR11 can i short close the item, by ticking delivery completed indictaor for line item.
please reply.
thank you.

Payroll Issues in Net payment

Dear Experts,
Business Scenario
The employee is on leave for 2 months (paid leave)in that 2 months loan should not deduct. 3rd month he came back and the laon amount should be deduct .
So,In Master Data for IT45 maintained record for those 2months in "Condition" amount=0 and for the next month onwards maintained regular installment payment which he has to pay.
When I am running payroll for the 3rd month am getting Loan Type Error as below
Error with a loan wage type
A loan wage type in table RT should be deducted, however the
however the remaining net amount was too small
Wage type /LRP
Please lower the loan repayment in infotype 0045
Choose an amount that can be deducted
while running simulation for 4th Month their is no Error in Payroll Log But for the 3rd Month "NET PAYMENT" is showing as Zero in Payslip and not showing in RT table also
Note: This Net Payment issue for the 3rd Month is not only to the above scenario Employee it is not showing for ALL EMPLOYEES.
Kindly help me in resolving this issue as this is Very Very High, your immediate response is highly Appreciable
Regards,
Rao.

Dear....
Please check that u press the calendar button to regenerate the last payment date and also check that repayment plan in IT0045
another thing check IT0078, what will be shown there????.
After that run one by one payroll for the months you have no deduction of loan and check is there any loan deduction or not.
What you have to do for skipping loan payment is copy the current loan and make the repayment amount zero, i hope u did the same but in the last split u have to recalculate the payment date.

PR to Payment Report

Hi All,
Our client wants us to develop a report for PR to Payment.
Input Field are Material
PR Doc. No.
PR Doc date
RFQ Doc No.
RFQ Doc Date
PO Doc. No
PO Doc Date
Vendor
GR Material Doc
GR Doc. Date
GR Posting Date
GI Material Doc.
GI Doc. Date
GI Posting Date
Invoice Doc. No
Outfields are
PR Number PR line Item PR Doc Date P.R released Date Storage Location A/c Assignment Item Category Material Code Material description PR Qty PR UoM RFQ number RFQ Doc Date RFQ Line Item PO Number PO Doc Date PO Net Price Currency. PO Gross Price Currency Exchange Rate Vendor Vendor Payment Terms DO.No DO. Qty D.O Date GR Doc Number GR Doc Date GR Posting Date GR Qty Received GR UoM GRN Amount in (LC) GRN Amount in (DC) Storage Location Rcvd WBS GI Doc Number GI Doc Date GI Posting Date GI Qty Issued GI UoM GI Amount in (LC) GI Amount in (DC) Issued / Transferred To-Storage Location WBS Material Issue Slip Invoice Doc No Invoice Doc Date Invoice Posting Date Invoice Base line date Invoice Payment terms Invoice Amount in (LC) Invoice Amount in (DC) Invoice Reference Number Cheque number/ against Invoice Payment due/ released status with respect to payment termss (+30 or -15) Payment Amount Payment Date Balance Payment
Is it possible to develop a report for these many fields.
They are asking to incliude RFQ fields & GI fields, which are irrevalent for Payment report.
Does SAP have any standard Report for PR to payment .
Regards

Hi,
to create reports like this i usually use the transaction sqvi - Quick view. it's pretty easy, you have to.
1. enter a name and description.
2. choose option table join.
3. insert all table you need (the tables have been mentioned above)
4. go back, then choose the fields you wanna display and as selection.
5. save and execute.
(you can even create a transaction out of this very easily).
regards, Paul.

Getting Error while posting billing into accounting.

Hi All,
Could any one help on this error,i am getting this while posting billing into accounting.
Tax statement item missing for tax code O0
Message no. FF805
Diagnosis
No tax item exists for tax code O0 in a G/L account item. A possible cause is an incorrect transfer of parameters by the application to the Accounting interface.
Procedure
Enter an OSS message.

Hi Raja,
We have many FF805 errors reported by customers and the same solution
has resolved the problem. Please note that the SD-FI interface changed
from earlier releases.
In the vast majority of cases, error FF805 occurs because of an error
in your pricing procedure. The previously attached note 112609 explains
in detail how tax codes are transfered to conditions.
The note 400766 explains the checks performed by the system on the Tax
codes:
1. system checks whether there is a revenue line for each tax line.
2. in the reverse case, for each revenue line containing a certain
   tax indicator there must be a tax line with this indicator.
If the tax condition has condition value zero and condition base
value zero, then it is not transferred to FI.
If you have revenue lines containing a tax indicator XX, but no
tax line with tax indicator XX, then the error FF805 issues, and
it is justified. => Please check these informations. I have attached
notes for further information.
-> EXAMPLE
   If tax condition MWST has base amount zero and value zero; for this
   reason it is not passed to accounting. But, according to the
   criteria reported by note 112609, its tax indicator EG: A7
   has been assigned to the condition EG: ZBR1.
   So in accounting there would be a revenue line with tax indicator A7,
   but there isn't any tax line with indicator A7 (because MWST doesn't
   pass to FI). The note 400766 states situation is unallowed, and error
   FF805 is justified.
Thanks and best regards,
Smile

Freight Charges in Service PO

Hello All
For the Service Po, one main service line is maintained with 1 (AU) & one Sub Services line is maintain ( Qty u2013 5 Ea ) & freight charges are maintain at item level ( Pricing Procedure)
(Freight condition is Header, item & Group Condition) is Rs 800/- for total Po Value.
Details of Freight Condition:
Condition class A (Discount or surcharge)
Calculat.type B (Fixed amount)
Condit.category B (Delivery costs)
Cond.control C (Changed manually)
Condit.origin C (Manually entered)
CASE1
In Service PO, if GR BASED IV & SERVICE BASED IV is selected.
Service entry is done for the Total Po Qty (5 Ea) & in GRN amount capture for the delivery cost is Rs 800/- & QTY 5 AU
But during MIRO. The Frieght Amount is coming 4000/- & Qty 5 AU because it is calculating on Total qty of Line items 5 * 800.
This happens, only if Service based IV is selected.
CASE2
In Service PO, if ONLY GR BASED IV is selected.
Service entry is done for the Total Po Qty (5 Ea) & GRN amount capture for the delivery cost is Rs 800/- & QTY 1 AU
During MIRO. The Frieght Amount is coming 800/- & QTY 1 AU. Which is Correct
But if two Service entry is done for the Total Po Qty (5 Ea) & total amount capture in GRN for the delivery cost is Rs 800/-& QTY 2 AU for the two service entry sheet.
But During MIRO. The Frieght Amount is coming 1600/- & Qty 2 AU
Kindly suggest
Thanks
Rajesh

Hi,
Check the customization in SPRO -- Materials Management -- Invoice Verification -- Logistics Invoice Verification -- Incoming Invoice --- Configure How Unplanned Delivery Costs Are Posted If you want to distibut then leave it blank. If you want to store in different GL then select 2
Secondly while doing MIRO at header level go to details tab and maintain the unplanned delivery cost if you want to get distribute in diffferent line item
regards

FF805 Error tax statement item missing for tax code

I am getting the above error when am trying to release an invoice to accounting in VF02. We are using a pricing procedure that contains US tax conditions and Europe tax conditions and the European condition has got determined according to the access sequence and condition records maintained. The tax code shows up correctly in the sales order and the billing document. The FTXP configuration is also in place. Does anyone have any idea about how to fix this. Any guidance or help on this greatly appreciated.
Thanks
Bharathi

Hello Bharathi,
If the problem happens in the invoice relevant for US, please notice:
For 'US' the tax jurisdiction functionality is activated and as a result
the FI tax side has special requirements for SD invoices that will be
posted to FI.
Please check if the used pricing procedure is customized as a tax
jurisdiction procedure (compare the standard RVAAUS).
At least one tax condition has to be transferred with condition
type (KNTYP) = '1'. That is a prerequisite for the filling of the
deepest tax level (BSET-TXJDP) for the tax jurisdiction functionality.
That is missing for the invoice and as the deepest level for the
tax jurisdiction is missing, the error FF 805 will be issued.
Please also refer to the SAP notes which might be helpful:
other attached notes which should guide you:
441456     Tax Shipments between the US and Canada using juris
419124     Export billing document with tax jurisdictions
380158     Jurisdiction code for export business transaction
In the vast majority of cases, error FF805 occurs because of an error
in your pricing procedure. The previously attached note 112609 explains
in detail how tax codes are transfered to conditions.
The note 400766 explains the checks performed by the system on the Tax
codes:
1. system checks whether there is a revenue line for each tax line.
2. in the reverse case, for each revenue line containing a certain
   tax indicator there must be a tax line with this indicator.
If the tax condition has condition value zero and condition base
value zero, then it is not transferred to FI.
If you have revenue lines containing a tax indicator XX, but no
tax line with tax indicator XX, then the error FF805 issues, and
it is justified. => Please check these informations. I have attached
notes for further information.
-> EXAMPLE
   If tax condition MWST has base amount zero and value zero; for this
   reason it is not passed to accounting. But, according to the
   criteria reported by note 112609, its tax indicator EG: A7
   has been assigned to the condition EG: ZBR1.
   So in accounting there would be a revenue line with tax indicator A7,
   but there isn't any tax line with indicator A7 (because MWST doesn't
   pass to FI). The note 400766 states situation is unallowed, and error
   FF805 is justified.
Please review this information as hope it will help solve your issue.
Best regards,
Alex

Error: FF805 Tax statement item missing for tax code

Hi all,
We are getting an error when releasing billing document to accounting in 4.7system.
Error: FF805 Tax statement item missing for tax code O0
No tax item exists for tax code O0 in a G/L account item. A possible cause is an incorrect transfer of
parameters by the application to the Accounting interface.
Please give your inputs and will be rewared.
Quick reponse will be appreciated.
Thanks & Regards.

Dear Mehak,
I am sorry for the late reply, but I started (in fact) to work in SDN Forum this year, even I entered earlier.
We have many FF805 errors reported by customers and the same solution has resolved the problem. Please note that the SD-FI interface changed from earlier releases. The note 400766 eplxains the checks made.
So it is possible that now you get error message FF805, when in an earlier release you didn't get it, eventhough no customizing change.
Please review note -> 392696   R/3 Tax Interface Configuration Guide
However please note => In the vast majority of cases, error FF805 occurs because of an error in your pricing procedure. The attached note 112609 explains in detail how tax codes are transfered to conditions.
The note 400766 explains the checks performed by the system on the Tax codes:
1. system checks whether there is a revenue line for each tax line.
2. in the reverse case, for each revenue line containing a certain tax indicator there must be a tax line with this indicator.
If the tax condition has condition value zero and condition base value zero, then it is not transferred to FI.
If you have revenue lines containing a tax indicator XX, but no tax line with tax indicator XX, then the error FF805 issues, and it is justified. => Please check these informations.
-> EXAMPLE
   If tax condition MWST has base amount zero and value zero; for this reason it is not passed to accounting. But, according to the criteria reported by note 112609, its tax indicator EG: A7
   has been assigned to the condition EG: ZBR1.
   So in accounting there would be a revenue line with tax indicator A7, but there isn't any tax line with indicator A7 (because MWST doesn't pass to FI). The note 400766 states situation is unallowed, and error FF805 is justified.
IMPORTANT: Just a hint, any issue with FI, kindly report in the forum:
Expert Forums - SAP Solutions - ERP Financials
There you will find a lot of people that works with FI and can help you with future issues, including me
I hope I could help you
Kind Regards,
Vanessa Barth.

Captive Consumption MM SD Excise

Dear SAP Gurus,
Please insruct me and guide me for the following scenario :-
The client wants to issue own goods manufactured for captive consumption against another production order. The client has the following requirements :-
1) Update the RG 23 part I register for finished goods stock issued as captive consumption
2) One line item, to be generated in RG 23 II register with assessable value "zero" and excise amounts "zero"
3) The amount of goods issued for captive consumption should be recorded as RM consumtion.
Thanks and regards,
Sumit Patwari

Hi Sumit,
Legally the self consumption should be treated as sales & excise duty must be paid on it based on the accessible value,
Even Free Items sent to Customer have to be paid for the excise.
So i don't feel any entry with the zero value will be updated in the register.
Check if the product belongs to any specific category.
regards
Mascot
Edited by: Manish Kumar on Oct 10, 2011 12:06 PM

GRN Amount Zero

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for