Group By -- Having Clause related doubt.
Hello,
Can we Write/Use rather a 'Having Condition' Before a Group by Clause ..?
If Yes then How does it Work.. I mean a 'Having' is a WHERE clause (filter) on Aggregate results ...
SO how does Having works before grouping the Results..??
Hi,
Aijaz Mallick wrote:
Hello,
Can we Write/Use rather a 'Having Condition' Before a Group by Clause ..?What happens when you try it?
If Yes then How does it Work.. I mean a 'Having' is a WHERE clause (filter) on Aggregate results ... Right; the HAVING clause is like another WHERE clause.
The WHERE clause is applied before the GROUP BY is done, and the aggregate functions are computed.
The HAVING clause is applied after the GROUP BY is done, and the aggregate functions are computed, so you can use aggregate functions in the HAVING clause.
SO how does Having works before grouping the Results..??The order in which clauses appear in your code isn't necessarily the order in which they are performed. For example,
SELECT job
, COUNT (*) AS cnt
FROM scott.emp
GROUP BY job;Does it confuse you that this query can reference COUNT (*) in the SLECT clause, which is before the GROUP BY clause?
The SELECT clause which always comes before the GROUP BY clause in code. That does not mean that the SELECT clause is completed before the GROUP BY clause is begun.
If the documentation says that clauses must be in a certain order, then use that order, even if your current version of Oracle allows them to be in a different order. There's no guarantee that the next version of Oracle will allow something that was always said to be wrong.
Similar Messages
-
Urgent Group by Having Clause Fails in Oracle and Works in Sybase
Hello EveryBody I need to select curve data of curve whose date is maximum in that curve so say if i ahve
so if records are
curveid curvename curvedate
1001 test1 12/12/1003
1001 test1 12/13/1003
1002 test2 12/12/2002
1002 test2 12/12/2004
I have query which run well in sybase but oracle screw up...My logic say having clause is use to filter the records of group so it should have worked in oracle.....
Here is query
select curveid,curvename from curve group by curveid having curvedate =max(curve_date)
This give "not a Group by " error in oracle....It work well in sybase...
ORA-00979: not a GROUP BY expression
I have query which use subquery to select these records but i don't want that to use that query
Please helpplease understand what I need the result
for each curve i need that data of that curve who date is max in that curve group
so say for 1001 there are two date 1/1/2001 and 1/1/2002
I need the data of curve 1001 with date 1/1/2002
Oracle should have some alternative solution for this....
If i have to use subquery I do have subquery
select a.curveid, b.curvename from curve a group by curveid having curvedate = (select max(curvedate) from curve where a.curveid=b.curveid group by curveid );
I don't want to use that ,,,
I want to solve my probelm using having and group/....
Main purpose of having is to filter the records from group result so IT SHOULD DO THAT WHY ORACLE GIVE ORA ERROR FOR
group by curve_id having curve_date=max(curve_date)
Creators of oracle please reply -
Group by having clause problem
Hi,
I have a query like this:
select a.id,a.first_nm,a.last_nm,a.subgroup_id
from temp a
where (a.subgroup_id like 'D%' or a.subgroup_id like 'G%')
group by a.id,a.first_nm,a.last_nm,a.subgroup_id having
count(*) >1
union
select b.id,b.first_nm,b.last_nm,b.subgroup_id
from temp b
where b. subgroup_id like 'F%'
group by b.id,b.first_nm,b.last_nm,b.subgroup_id having count(*) > 2;
I want the result like this:
10001 Wendy Lin DAP
10001 Wendy Lin GMP
10002 Jim Davis FAD
10002 Jim Davis FIP
10002 Jim Davis FIAP
My query above didn't give the right result, Can someone help me?
Thank you very much!
WendyYou may like to try this way...
select id,name,sub_id
from a
where id in (select id
from a
group by id
having count(id)>1)
order by id,name, sub_id asc;
results are..
ID NAME CODE
1 wendy DIA
1 wendy LCA
1 wendy PLA
2 jim CPR
2 jim DIA
2 jim PLA
Hope this helps. -
Use of group by and having clause
hi frnds
can anybody explain me the use of group by an having clause in select state mentHi Rohit,
1. GROUP BY f1 ... fn
2. GROUP BY (itab)
1. GROUP BY f1 ... fn
Effect
Groups database table data in a SELECT command on one line in the result set. A group is a set of lines which all have the same values in each column determined by the field descriptors f1 ... fn.
... GROUP BY f1 ... fn always requires a list in the SELECT clause. If you use field descriptors without an aggregate funciton in the SELECT clause, you must list them in the GROUP BY f1 ... fn clause.
Example
Output the number of passengers, the total weight and the average weight of luggage for all Lufthansa flights on 28.02.1995:
TABLES SBOOK.
DATA: COUNT TYPE I, SUM TYPE P DECIMALS 2, AVG TYPE F.
DATA: CONNID LIKE SBOOK-CONNID.
SELECT CONNID COUNT( * ) SUM( LUGGWEIGHT ) AVG( LUGGWEIGHT )
INTO (CONNID, COUNT, SUM, AVG)
FROM SBOOK
WHERE
CARRID = 'LH' AND
FLDATE = '19950228'
GROUP BY CONNID.
WRITE: / CONNID, COUNT, SUM, AVG.
ENDSELECT.
Note
... GROUP BY f1 ... fn is not supported for pooled and cluster tables.
2. GROUP BY (itab)
Effect
Works like GROUP BY f1 ... fn if the internal table itab contains the list f1 ... fn as ABAP source code. The internal table itab can only have one field. This field must be of the type C and should not be more than 72 characters long. itab must be enclosed in parentheses and there should be no blanks between the parentheses and the table name.
Note
The same restrictions apply to this variant as to GROUP BY f1 ... fn.
Example
Output all Lufthansa departure points with the number of destinations:
TABLES: SPFLI.
DATA: BEGIN OF WA.
INCLUDE STRUCTURE SPFLI.
DATA: COUNT TYPE I.
DATA: END OF WA.
DATA: WA_TAB(72) TYPE C,
GTAB LIKE TABLE OF WA_TAB,
FTAB LIKE TABLE OF WA_TAB,
COUNT TYPE I.
CLEAR: GTAB, FTAB.
WA_TAB = 'COTYFROM COUNT( * ) AS COUNT'. APPEND FTAB.
APPEND WA_TAB TO FTAB.
WA_TAB = 'CITYFROM'.
APPEND WA_TAB TO GTAB.
SELECT DISTINCT (FTAB)
INTO CORRESPONDING FIELDS OF WA
FROM SPFLI
WHERE
CARRID = 'LH'
GROUP BY (GTAB).
WRITE: / WA-CITYFROM, WA-COUNT.
ENDSELECT.
Regards,
Susmitha -
How to have Having clause in Group by
Hi All,
While using aggregated function (max,min etc) on columns, the SQL generated automatically has the non aggregated columns in the group by clause. How to specify the Having condition ?
select a , max(b)
from t
group by a
having <condition>
TIA...Hi,
In your interface drag and drop the source column into canvas for which you want to generate the HAVING clause.
It will create filters for those columns .Now use aggregation functions like SUM, MAX,MIN, AVG etc in that filter query .
The code generated will now contain the HAVING clause in it .
Thanks,
Sutirtha -
Group by clause and having clause in select
hi frnds
plz give me some information of group by and having clause used in select statement with example
thanksThe Open SQL statement for reading data from database tables is:
SELECT <result>
INTO <target>
FROM <source>
[WHERE <condition>]
[GROUP BY <fields>]
[HAVING <cond>]
[ORDER BY <fields>].
The SELECT statement is divided into a series of simple clauses, each of which has a different part to play in selecting, placing, and arranging the data from the database.
You can only use the HAVING clause in conjunction with the GROUP BY clause.
To select line groups, use:
SELECT <lines> <s1> [AS <a1>] <s2> [AS <a2>] ...
<agg> <sm> [AS <am>] <agg> <sn> [AS <an>] ...
GROUP BY <s1> <s2> ....
HAVING <cond>.
The conditions <cond> that you can use in the HAVING clause are the same as those in the SELECT clause, with the restrictions that you can only use columns from the SELECT clause, and not all of the columns from the database tables in the FROM clause. If you use an invalid column, a runtime error results.
On the other hand, you can enter aggregate expressions for all columns read from the database table that do not appear in the GROUP BY clause. This means that you can use aggregate expressions, even if they do not appear in the SELECT clause. You cannot use aggregate expressions in the conditions in the WHERE clause.
As in the WHERE clause, you can specify the conditions in the HAVING clause as the contents of an internal table with line type C and length 72.
Example
DATA WA TYPE SFLIGHT.
SELECT CONNID
INTO WA-CONNID
FROM SFLIGHT
WHERE CARRID = 'LH'
GROUP BY CONNID
HAVING SUM( SEATSOCC ) > 300.
WRITE: / WA-CARRID, WA-CONNID.
ENDSELECT.
This example selects groups of lines from database table SFLIGHT with the value LH for CARRID and identical values of CONNID. The groups are then restricted further by the condition that the sum of the contents of the column SEATSOCC for a group must be greater than 300.
The <b>GROUP BY</b> clause summarizes several lines from the database table into a single line of the selection.
The GROUP BY clause allows you to summarize lines that have the same content in particular columns. Aggregate functions are applied to the other columns. You can specify the columns in the GROUP BY clause either statically or dynamically.
Specifying Columns Statically
To specify the columns in the GROUP BY clause statically, use:
SELECT <lines> <s1> [AS <a 1>] <s 2> [AS <a 2>] ...
<agg> <sm> [AS <a m>] <agg> <s n> [AS <a n>] ...
GROUP BY <s1> <s 2> ....
To use the GROUP BY clause, you must specify all of the relevant columns in the SELECT clause. In the GROUP BY clause, you list the field names of the columns whose contents must be the same. You can only use the field names as they appear in the database table. Alias names from the SELECT clause are not allowed.
All columns of the SELECT clause that are not listed in the GROUP BY clause must be included in aggregate functions. This defines how the contents of these columns is calculated when the lines are summarized.
Specifying Columns Dynamically
To specify the columns in the GROUP BY clause dynamically, use:
... GROUP BY (<itab>) ...
where <itab> is an internal table with line type C and maximum length 72 characters containing the column names <s 1 > <s 2 > .....
Example
DATA: CARRID TYPE SFLIGHT-CARRID,
MINIMUM TYPE P DECIMALS 2,
MAXIMUM TYPE P DECIMALS 2.
SELECT CARRID MIN( PRICE ) MAX( PRICE )
INTO (CARRID, MINIMUM, MAXIMUM)
FROM SFLIGHT
GROUP BY CARRID.
WRITE: / CARRID, MINIMUM, MAXIMUM.
ENDSELECT.
regards
vinod -
Use of Where and having clause
Hi all,
I always have a doubt about use of HAVING and WHERE clause,
suppose I have table T1 with only one column C1
CREATE TABLE T1
(C1 VARCHAR2(1) );
which having data by following INSERT scripts
INSERT INTO T1 VALUES('A');
INSERT INTO T1 VALUES('B');
INSERT INTO T1 VALUES('C');
INSERT INTO T1 VALUES('A');
INSERT INTO T1 VALUES('B');
INSERT INTO T1 VALUES('A');
Now I want result as follows
C1 ==== COUNT(C1)
==============
B ===== 2
A ===== 3
So out of query 1 and 2 which approach is right ?
1) SELECT C1,COUNT(C1) FROM T1
WHERE C1<>'C'
GROUP BY C1
ORDER BY C1 DESC;
2) SELECT C1,COUNT(C1) FROM T1
GROUP BY C1
HAVING C1<>'C'
ORDER BY C1 DESC;
Edited by: user13306874 on Jun 21, 2010 2:36 AMIn SQL, it's always best to filter data at the earliest moment possible.
In your example the WHERE clause would be that moment:
SQL> explain plan for
2 select c1,count(c1)
3 from t1
4 where c1 != 'C'
5 group by c1
6* order by c1 desc;
Explained.
SQL> select * from table(dbms_xplan.display);
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
Plan hash value: 3946799371
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes |
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 5 | 10 |
| 1 | SORT GROUP BY | | 5 | 10 |
|* 2 | TABLE ACCESS FULL| T1 | 5 | 10 |
Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
2 - filter("C1"!='C')
18 rows selected.
SQL>As you can see the filter is applied during the scan of T1.
Whereas in the HAVING case:
SQL> explain plan for
2 select c1,count(c1)
3 from t1
4 group by c1
5 having c1 != 'C'
6* order by c1 desc;
Explained.
SQL> select * from table(dbms_xplan.display);
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
Plan hash value: 3146800528
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes |
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 6 | 12 |
|* 1 | FILTER | | | |
| 2 | SORT GROUP BY | | 6 | 12 |
| 3 | TABLE ACCESS FULL| T1 | 6 | 12 |
Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
1 - filter("C1"!='C')
18 rows selected.
SQL>The scan is done after all groups have been computed: one of which was computed in vain, since it will be filtered away due to the HAVING clause.
In general I would use as a guideline: if you are not using aggregate functions in your HAVING clause predicate, then move that predicate to the WHERE portion of your query.
Edited by: Toon Koppelaars on Jun 21, 2010 11:54 AM -
Why Scalar Subquery expression cannot be used in HAVING clauses?
Hi All,
I'm new to SQL. I'm confused with Scalar Subquery.
Is there anyone who can answer me why Scalar Subquery expression cannot be used in HAVING clauses.
Can you show me a example?
Thanks very much,
Xianyi.Ye
Edited by: 908428 on 2012-1-16 下午7:24Hi,
908428 wrote:
Hi Frank,
Thank you for your quick reply. I also agree with your point.
But when I read the book, "OCA Oracle Database SQL Certified Expert Exam Guide",( link to illegal copies of book removed by moderator )
on Page 359, it said that
Scalar subquery expressions cannot be used in the following locations:
1. In CHECK constraints
2. In GROUP BY clauses
3. In HAVING clauses
4. In a function-based index (which is coming up in Chapter 11)
5. As a DEFAULT value for a column
6. In the RETURNING clause of any DML statement
7. In the WHEN conditions of CASE
8. In the START WITH and CONNECT BY clauses, which we discuss in
Chapter 16.7 and 8 are wrong. Scalar sub-queries can be used in WHEN conditions and START WITH and CONNECT BY clauses. (At least in Oracle 10.2. Is the book based on some earlier version?)
Edited by: BluShadow on 17-Jan-2012 09:08 -
Which two statements are true about WHERE and HAVING clause ?
Which two statements are true about WHERE and HAVING clause ?
1. WHERE clause can be used to restict rows only
2.HAVING clause can be used to restrict groups only
3.HAVING clause can be used to restrict groups and rows
Plz help me in dis ques...which two will be correct...i think its 1 and 2...but not sure.863180 wrote:
Plz help me in dis ques...which two will be correct...i think its 1 and 2...but not sure.If you are not sure then you do not fully understand HAVING.
SY. -
Select stmts with Having Clause
Hi,
Can some body help me to improve the performance of the below query...
select t.seq_no,t.contract_id,t.date_from from test_plan_tab t
group by t.seq_no,t.contract_id,t.date_from
having (select count(*)
from test_plan_tab p
where p.contract_id = t.contract_id
and p.date_from = t.date_from) > 1
The having clause will reduce the performance of the above query I guess...
Thanks And Best Regards,
/Dinesh...If Seq_no is unique then try this
SELECT MIN(t.seq_no),contract_id,t.date_from,count(*) from test_plan_tab t
group by t.contract_id,t.date_from
HAVING COUNT(*) > 1or
you can try as fsitja said, but you can omit the group by as the partition has already been done on grouping columns
SELECT seq_no, contract_id, date_from
FROM (SELECT t.seq_no, t.contract_id, t.date_from, COUNT(*) over(PARTITION BY contract_id, date_from) tot
FROM test_plan_tab t)
WHERE tot > 1Regards,
Prazy -
Having clause with Analytic function
can you pls let me know if we can use HAVING clause with analytic function
select eid,empno,sum(sal) over(partition by year)
from employee
where dept = 'SALES'
having sum(sal) > 10000I m getting error while using the above,
IS that we can use HAVING clause with partition by
Thanks in advanceYour having clause isn't using an analytical function, is using a regular aggregate function.
You also can't use analytical functions in the where clause or having clause like that as they are windowing functions and belong at the top of the query.
You would have to wrap the query to achieve what you want e.g.
SQL> ed
Wrote file afiedt.buf
1 select deptno, total_sal
2 from (
3 select deptno,sum(sal) over (partition by deptno) as total_sal
4 from emp
5 )
6 group by deptno, total_sal
7* having total_sal > 10000
SQL> /
DEPTNO TOTAL_SAL
20 10875
SQL> -
How can user specify HAVING clause in Interactive Report
How can user specify HAVING clause in Interactive Report after making the group by selection? Under Actions/Format, the user sees just the Group By-Sort and Group By options.
Hi ,
Thanks for your information.
I am new to the APEX.*i need to show Progress bar while opening the each page* then user can know some process is happening from the backside and i don't know where i need to add and call the below function.could you please provide the steps for the progress bar.
In my application there are almost 100 pages are there so, i need to show progress bar on each page while opening .could you please provide Global function to call on each page.
function html_url_Progress(pThis){
$x_Show('AjaxLoading');
window.setTimeout('$s("AjaxLoading",$x("AjaxLoading").innerHTML)', 100);
//doSubmit('APPLY_CHANGES');
redirect(pUrl);
Regards
Narender B -
HAVING clause, or ORDER BY clause ....ERROR
hi i have following query which throws error plz find the solution for the query to go safe..
Select C.src_cd,
D.src_nm,
count(*) supp_clm_count,
(CASE WHEN A.clm_ttladjamt > 0 then A.clm_ttladjamt else A.clm_ttlreqamt END) as amount
From IWOWNER.WC_clm A,
IWOWNER.WC_clm_srvc B,
SHOWNER.WC_SRC C,
SHOWNER.WC_SRC_lang D
where A.clm_id = B.clm_id
and A.rcv_loc_id = C.src_id
and C.src_id = D.src_id
and TRANSLATE(A.clm_rqst_type_cd) = 'SUPPLIERCLAIM'
and TRANSLATE(A.clm_typ_cd) in ('WARRANTY','PRE-DELIVERY')
and DATE(A.clm_create_dt) between '01/01/2000' and '01/01/2010'
Group by C.src_cd, D.src_nm
ERROR:
SQLSTATE: 42803, SQLERRMC: CLM_TTLADJAMT
Message: An expression starting with "CLM_TTLADJAMT" specified in a SELECT clause, HAVING clause, or ORDER BY clause is not specified in the GROUP BY clause or it is in a SELECT clause, HAVING clause, or ORDER BY clause with a column function and no GROUP BY clause is specifiedHi,
With analytic function
/* Formatted on 2009/07/22 10:47 (Formatter Plus v4.8.8) */
SELECT DISTINCT c.src_cd, d.src_nm,
COUNT (1) OVER (PARTITION BY c.src_cd, d.src_nm)
supp_clm_count,
SUM (CASE
WHEN a.clm_ttladjamt > 0
THEN a.clm_ttladjamt
ELSE a.clm_ttlreqamt
END
) OVER (PARTITION BY c.src_cd, d.src_nm) AS amount
FROM iwowner.wc_clm a,
iwowner.wc_clm_srvc b,
showner.wc_src c,
showner.wc_src_lang d
WHERE a.clm_id = b.clm_id
AND a.rcv_loc_id = c.src_id
AND c.src_id = d.src_id
AND a.clm_rqst_type_cd = 'SUPPLIERCLAIM'
AND a.clm_typ_cd IN ('WARRANTY', 'PRE-DELIVERY')
AND a.clm_create_dt BETWEEN TO_DATE ('01/01/2000', 'dd/mm/yyyy')
AND TO_DATE ('01/01/2010', 'dd/mm/yyyy') -
Output varies for group by & where Clause
Below are the two statements which i am comapring .
1) for this i get a output as it displays 0 because there are no rows matched to this criteria .
select count(No) from T1 where No = 3"
1
0
1 record(s) selected.
2) Same way i am looking to get output for this statement .If value exists it gives the count if not it should return 0.
select count(*) from T1 GROUP BY No HAVING No = 3"
1
0 record(s) selected.
Can someone suggest thisuser587133 wrote:
Below are the two statements which i am comapring .
1) for this i get a output as it displays 0 because there are no rows matched to this criteria .
select count(No) from T1 where No = 3"
1
0
1 record(s) selected.
2) Same way i am looking to get output for this statement .If value exists it gives the count if not it should return 0.
select count(*) from T1 GROUP BY No HAVING No = 3"
1
0 record(s) selected.
Can someone suggest thisIn the second query the having clause is applied after the count, so the count is being done and then any rows matching the having clause are returned. As there are no rows matching the having clause the result is that no rows are returned. The count is being done, but you are filtering out those rows from the result. -
Hello all,
i'm getting error when i try to write sub query in having clause. check out my query
select ROUND( Count( distinct Sales2011_DIVDPTA.DIVDPTA_Item_Dept ),0) AS "F1" , ROUND( Count( Sales2011.Sales2011_DG1.Item_Season ),0) AS "F2"
from Sales2011.Sales2011_JT
INNER JOIN Sales2011.Sales2011_DG1 On Sales2011.Sales2011_DG1.DG1_ID =Sales2011.Sales2011_JT.DG1_ID
LEFT JOIN Sales2011.Sales2011_DIVDPTA On nvl(Sales2011.Sales2011_DIVDPTA.DIVDPTA_ITEM_DIVISION,' ')=nvl(Sales2011.Sales2011_DG1.Item_Division,' ')
AND nvl(Sales2011.Sales2011_DIVDPTA.DIVDPTA_ITEM_DEPT,' ')=nvl(Sales2011.Sales2011_DG1.Item_Dept,' ')
having ( ROUND( Count( Sales2011.Sales2011_DG1.Item_Season ),0) in ( 0)
But it is not executed if I use the sub query in having clause
select ROUND( Count( distinct Sales2011_DIVDPTA.DIVDPTA_Item_Dept ),0) AS "F1" , ROUND( Count( Sales2011.Sales2011_DG1.Item_Season ),0) AS "F2"
from Sales2011.Sales2011_JT
INNER JOIN Sales2011.Sales2011_DG1 On Sales2011.Sales2011_DG1.DG1_ID =Sales2011.Sales2011_JT.DG1_ID
LEFT JOIN Sales2011.Sales2011_DIVDPTA On nvl(Sales2011.Sales2011_DIVDPTA.DIVDPTA_ITEM_DIVISION,' ')=nvl(Sales2011.Sales2011_DG1.Item_Division,' ')
AND nvl(Sales2011.Sales2011_DIVDPTA.DIVDPTA_ITEM_DEPT,' ')=nvl(Sales2011.Sales2011_DG1.Item_Dept,' ')
having ( ROUND( Count( Sales2011.Sales2011_DG1.Item_Season ),0)
in ( select ROUND( Count(
Sales2011.Sales2011_DG1.Item_Season ),0) from Sales2011.Sales2011_DG1 )
Error at Command Line:1 Column:0
Error report:
SQL Error: ORA-00979: not a GROUP BY expression
00979. 00000 - "not a GROUP BY expression"
*Cause:
*Action:any help ???Sorry unintentionally i have posted my question here.
will you please elaborate this? Becoz i'm not using group by clause in both query. First query run successfully but as i put sub query in having clause it raised an error. will you tell where i'm committing mistake?
Aggregates in the HAVING clause do not need to appear in the SELECT list. If the HAVING clause contains a subquery, the subquery can refer to the outer query block if and only if it refers to a grouping column.Edited by: Oracle Studnet on Aug 14, 2011 11:28 PM
Maybe you are looking for
-
Excise Tab is not appear in the MIGO display --- Import Process
Hi Experts , Excise tab is not appear in the display of the material document in Import process. Process flow. 1. Import Po. 2. Customs clearing (MIRO) 3. Capture excise invoice against the Import Po.(Reference to MIRO document ) 4.MIGO with movement
-
I am dying to get a MacBook Pro, but does anyone know if there is any way that I can use One Note?? I know the latest version of Office seems to have left it out. Are there any plans to include it on the 2012 version? And also, I saw there is an app
-
There is a problem with Adobe Acrobat/Reader. If it is running please exit and try again. (0:521)
There is a problem with Adobe Acrobat/Reader. If it is running please exit and try again. (0:521) Although I have found other threads in this forum relating to this error - none of the fixes appear to work. I've not found precisely the same error num
-
SSDT-BI for SQL Server 2014, Command line(silent unattendant automatic) installation script/steps
Hi, I have downloaded SSDT-BI software and looking for commandline steps,config file for this. http://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/details.aspx?id=42313 Any one have Command line installations steps for SSDT-BI automatic(command line) installatio
-
Hello, I just build a Solaris 10 server on an x86 box. I forgot to mirror the two disks when I install the OS. Can I get some help with this? I have this # zpool list rpool 278G 5.77G 272G 2% ONLINE - # zpool status pool: online state: ONLINE scan: n