How to have Having clause in Group by

Hi All,
While using aggregated function (max,min etc) on columns, the SQL generated automatically has the non aggregated columns in the group by clause. How to specify the Having condition ?
select a , max(b)
from t
group by a
having <condition>
TIA...

Hi,
In your interface drag and drop the source column into canvas for which you want to generate the HAVING clause.
It will create filters for those columns .Now use aggregation functions like SUM, MAX,MIN, AVG etc in that filter query .
The code generated will now contain the HAVING clause in it .
Thanks,
Sutirtha

Similar Messages

Group by clause and having clause in select

hi frnds
plz give me some information of group by and having clause used in select statement with example
thanks

The Open SQL statement for reading data from database tables is:
SELECT      <result>
INTO      <target>
FROM      <source>
[WHERE    <condition>]
[GROUP BY <fields>]
[HAVING   <cond>]
[ORDER BY <fields>].
The SELECT statement is divided into a series of simple clauses, each of which has a different part to play in selecting, placing, and arranging the data from the database.
You can only use the HAVING clause in conjunction with the GROUP BY clause.
To select line groups, use:
SELECT <lines> <s1> [AS <a1>] <s2> [AS <a2>] ...
               <agg> <sm> [AS <am>] <agg> <sn> [AS <an>] ...
       GROUP BY <s1> <s2> ....
       HAVING <cond>.
The conditions <cond> that you can use in the HAVING clause are the same as those in the SELECT clause, with the restrictions that you can only use columns from the SELECT clause, and not all of the columns from the database tables in the FROM clause. If you use an invalid column, a runtime error results.
On the other hand, you can enter aggregate expressions for all columns read from the database table that do not appear in the GROUP BY clause. This means that you can use aggregate expressions, even if they do not appear in the SELECT clause. You cannot use aggregate expressions in the conditions in the WHERE clause.
As in the WHERE clause, you can specify the conditions in the HAVING clause as the contents of an internal table with line type C and length 72.
Example
DATA WA TYPE SFLIGHT.
SELECT   CONNID
INTO     WA-CONNID
FROM     SFLIGHT
WHERE    CARRID = 'LH'
GROUP BY CONNID
HAVING   SUM( SEATSOCC ) > 300.
WRITE: / WA-CARRID, WA-CONNID.
ENDSELECT.
This example selects groups of lines from database table SFLIGHT with the value LH for CARRID and identical values of CONNID. The groups are then restricted further by the condition that the sum of the contents of the column SEATSOCC for a group must be greater than 300.
The <b>GROUP BY</b> clause summarizes several lines from the database table into a single line of the selection.
The GROUP BY clause allows you to summarize lines that have the same content in particular columns. Aggregate functions are applied to the other columns. You can specify the columns in the GROUP BY clause either statically or dynamically.
Specifying Columns Statically
To specify the columns in the GROUP BY clause statically, use:
SELECT <lines> <s1> [AS <a 1>] <s 2> [AS <a 2>] ...
               <agg> <sm> [AS <a m>] <agg> <s n> [AS <a n>] ...
       GROUP BY <s1> <s 2> ....
To use the GROUP BY clause, you must specify all of the relevant columns in the SELECT clause. In the GROUP BY clause, you list the field names of the columns whose contents must be the same. You can only use the field names as they appear in the database table. Alias names from the SELECT clause are not allowed.
All columns of the SELECT clause that are not listed in the GROUP BY clause must be included in aggregate functions. This defines how the contents of these columns is calculated when the lines are summarized.
Specifying Columns Dynamically
To specify the columns in the GROUP BY clause dynamically, use:
... GROUP BY (<itab>) ...
where <itab> is an internal table with line type C and maximum length 72 characters containing the column names <s 1 > <s 2 > .....
Example
DATA: CARRID TYPE SFLIGHT-CARRID,
      MINIMUM TYPE P DECIMALS 2,
      MAXIMUM TYPE P DECIMALS 2.
SELECT   CARRID MIN( PRICE ) MAX( PRICE )
INTO     (CARRID, MINIMUM, MAXIMUM)
FROM     SFLIGHT
GROUP BY CARRID.
WRITE: / CARRID, MINIMUM, MAXIMUM.
ENDSELECT.
regards
vinod

How to use order by within Group by clause

Hi All,
I need a help as to how should i use the Order by clause so that the data should be in order with respect to one column, and at the same time whole data is grouped by some other column...like
Select RaceNo,Venue,FP,BP from Race group by RaceNo
Here I want to order by FP in ascending order for each group. When i am using it , whole order is changing.
Can anybody suggest me how to use order by clause that would apply to each group of data.
Thanks .

order by clause should be used at the last in any query.......but in group by clause u can't use use that becoz u group according to column then no ordering is needed there......if u want to filter something then u can use having clause and later if u need to arrange then u can use order by clause.........
i hope this eg.l gives u some clarification....
e.g
select deptno,count(empno)
from dept
group by deptno
having count(empno) > 10
order by deptno

Urgent Group by Having Clause Fails in Oracle and Works in Sybase

Hello EveryBody I need to select curve data of curve whose date is maximum in that curve so say if i ahve
so if records are
curveid curvename curvedate
1001 test1 12/12/1003
1001 test1 12/13/1003
1002 test2 12/12/2002
1002 test2 12/12/2004
I have query which run well in sybase but oracle screw up...My logic say having clause is use to filter the records of group so it should have worked in oracle.....
Here is query
select curveid,curvename from curve group by curveid having curvedate =max(curve_date)
This give "not a Group by " error in oracle....It work well in sybase...
ORA-00979: not a GROUP BY expression
I have query which use subquery to select these records but i don't want that to use that query
Please help

please understand what I need the result
for each curve i need that data of that curve who date is max in that curve group
so say for 1001 there are two date 1/1/2001 and 1/1/2002
I need the data of curve 1001 with date 1/1/2002
Oracle should have some alternative solution for this....
If i have to use subquery I do have subquery
select a.curveid, b.curvename from curve a group by curveid having curvedate = (select max(curvedate) from curve where a.curveid=b.curveid group by curveid );
I don't want to use that ,,,
I want to solve my probelm using having and group/....
Main purpose of having is to filter the records from group result so IT SHOULD DO THAT WHY ORACLE GIVE ORA ERROR FOR
group by curve_id having curve_date=max(curve_date)
Creators of oracle please reply

Use of group by and having clause

hi frnds
can anybody explain me the use of group by an having clause in select state ment

Hi Rohit,
1. GROUP BY f1 ... fn
2. GROUP BY (itab)
1. GROUP BY f1 ... fn
Effect
Groups database table data in a SELECT command on one line in the result set. A group is a set of lines which all have the same values in each column determined by the field descriptors f1 ... fn.
... GROUP BY f1 ... fn always requires a list in the SELECT clause. If you use field descriptors without an aggregate funciton in the SELECT clause, you must list them in the GROUP BY f1 ... fn clause.
Example
Output the number of passengers, the total weight and the average weight of luggage for all Lufthansa flights on 28.02.1995:
TABLES SBOOK.
DATA: COUNT TYPE I, SUM TYPE P DECIMALS 2, AVG TYPE F.
DATA: CONNID LIKE SBOOK-CONNID.
SELECT CONNID COUNT( * ) SUM( LUGGWEIGHT ) AVG( LUGGWEIGHT )
       INTO (CONNID, COUNT, SUM, AVG)
       FROM SBOOK
       WHERE
         CARRID   = 'LH'       AND
         FLDATE   = '19950228'
       GROUP BY CONNID.
WRITE: / CONNID, COUNT, SUM, AVG.
ENDSELECT.
Note
... GROUP BY f1 ... fn is not supported for pooled and cluster tables.
2. GROUP BY (itab)
Effect
Works like GROUP BY f1 ... fn if the internal table itab contains the list f1 ... fn as ABAP source code. The internal table itab can only have one field. This field must be of the type C and should not be more than 72 characters long. itab must be enclosed in parentheses and there should be no blanks between the parentheses and the table name.
Note
The same restrictions apply to this variant as to GROUP BY f1 ... fn.
Example
Output all Lufthansa departure points with the number of destinations:
TABLES: SPFLI.
DATA:   BEGIN OF WA.
          INCLUDE STRUCTURE SPFLI.
DATA:     COUNT TYPE I.
DATA:   END OF WA.
DATA:   WA_TAB(72) TYPE C,
        GTAB LIKE TABLE OF WA_TAB,
        FTAB LIKE TABLE OF WA_TAB,
        COUNT TYPE I.
CLEAR: GTAB, FTAB.
WA_TAB = 'COTYFROM COUNT( * ) AS COUNT'. APPEND FTAB.
APPEND WA_TAB TO FTAB.
WA_TAB = 'CITYFROM'.
APPEND WA_TAB TO GTAB.
SELECT DISTINCT (FTAB)
       INTO CORRESPONDING FIELDS OF WA
       FROM SPFLI
       WHERE
         CARRID   = 'LH'
       GROUP BY (GTAB).
WRITE: / WA-CITYFROM, WA-COUNT.
ENDSELECT.
Regards,
Susmitha

How can user specify HAVING clause in Interactive Report

How can user specify HAVING clause in Interactive Report after making the group by selection? Under Actions/Format, the user sees just the Group By-Sort and Group By options.

Hi ,
Thanks for your information.
I am new to the APEX.*i need to show Progress bar while opening the each page* then user can know some process is happening from the backside and i don't know where i need to add and call the below function.could you please provide the steps for the progress bar.
In my application there are almost 100 pages are there so, i need to show progress bar on each page while opening .could you please provide Global function to call on each page.
function html_url_Progress(pThis){
$x_Show('AjaxLoading');
window.setTimeout('$s("AjaxLoading",$x("AjaxLoading").innerHTML)', 100);
//doSubmit('APPLY_CHANGES');
redirect(pUrl);
Regards
Narender B

Group By -- Having Clause related doubt.

Hello,
Can we Write/Use rather a 'Having Condition' Before a Group by Clause ..?
If Yes then How does it Work.. I mean a 'Having' is a WHERE clause (filter) on Aggregate results ...
SO how does Having works before grouping the Results..??

Hi,
Aijaz Mallick wrote:
Hello,
Can we Write/Use rather a 'Having Condition' Before a Group by Clause ..?What happens when you try it?
If Yes then How does it Work.. I mean a 'Having' is a WHERE clause (filter) on Aggregate results ... Right; the HAVING clause is like another WHERE clause.
The WHERE clause is applied before the GROUP BY is done, and the aggregate functions are computed.
The HAVING clause is applied after the GROUP BY is done, and the aggregate functions are computed, so you can use aggregate functions in the HAVING clause.
SO how does Having works before grouping the Results..??The order in which clauses appear in your code isn't necessarily the order in which they are performed. For example,
SELECT    job
,         COUNT (*) AS cnt
FROM      scott.emp
GROUP BY job;Does it confuse you that this query can reference COUNT (*) in the SLECT clause, which is before the GROUP BY clause?
The SELECT clause which always comes before the GROUP BY clause in code. That does not mean that the SELECT clause is completed before the GROUP BY clause is begun.
If the documentation says that clauses must be in a certain order, then use that order, even if your current version of Oracle allows them to be in a different order. There's no guarantee that the next version of Oracle will allow something that was always said to be wrong.

How to have different accounting for VAT of suppliers having two sites?

Hello Sir/Ma'am:
Currently we are having 3 tax rates - VAT-0, AA-12, BB-12. [(N) Tax Managers>Tax Configuration>Tax Rates]
Vat-0 is for non-Vatable purchases.
AA-12 is for 12% Vat on AA site purchases.
BB-12 is for 12% Vat on BB site purchases.
We opted to use these rates depending on the invoice and site we entered in the Payables.
So what we did, we just choose what rate that is applicable to an invoice thru TAX CLASSIFICATION CODE column at the Invoice Lines. The LOV shows the 3 rates we made.
But it only gives the 1 recoverable tax accounting combination from what we defaulted. As a result wrong accounting will be given to the others.
How to have a different accounting for recoverable tax (VAT) for AA and BB?
Thanks,
Emgee

I already found out a solution for my query. thanks!
emgee

How do I have the list of groups as well as individuals and their information show up in address book?

How do I have the list of groups as well as individuals and their information show up in address book?

Let me rephrase...
How do I get all of the panes (groups, individuals and individual information) to show at the same time now in Lion Address Book?

How to have an overview on Product Group level

Hi All,
Customer want to have a planning in SNP to reflect their several levels of product? For example as the below structure,
SKU numbers->Sub Brand->Brand-> Product Group
How to have an overview on Sub Brand, Brand and product Group level?
Best Regards,
Bin
Edited by: Bin Li on Mar 6, 2009 9:44 AM

Hi Bin,
You can define your various hierarchies of planning in SNP through Master planning object structures. (/SAPAPO/MSDP_ADMIN - Administration of Demand Planning and Supply Network Planning )
Regards,
R. Senthil Mareeswaran.

Query, Having clause

I have a test data, like this
with t as (
select 1 tp, 0 sm_1, 1 sm_2, 'a' code from dual
union all
select 1 tp, 0 sm_1, 2 sm_2, 'b' from dual
union all
select 2 tp, 3 sm_1, 0 sm_2, 'c' from dual
union all
select 3 tp, 0 sm_1, 2 sm_2, 'a' from dual
union all
select 4 tp, 0 sm_1, 1 sm_2, 'a' from dual
union all
select 4 tp, 2 sm_1, 3 sm_2,'b' from dual
union all
select 4 tp, 2 sm_1, 3 sm_2, 'c' from dual
union all
select 5 tp, 0 sm_1, 0 sm_2, 'a' from dual
union all
select 5 tp, 0 sm_1, 0 sm_2, 'b' from dual
union all
select 5 tp, 0 sm_1, 0 sm_2, 'c' from dual)
SQL> with t as (
2 select 1 tp, 0 sm_1, 1 sm_2, 'a' code from dual
3 union all
4 select 1 tp, 0 sm_1, 2 sm_2, 'b' from dual
5 union all
6 select 2 tp, 3 sm_1, 0 sm_2, 'c' from dual
7 union all
8 select 3 tp, 0 sm_1, 2 sm_2, 'a' from dual
9 union all
10 select 4 tp, 0 sm_1, 1 sm_2, 'a' from dual
11 union all
12 select 4 tp, 2 sm_1, 3 sm_2,'b' from dual
13 union all
14 select 4 tp, 2 sm_1, 3 sm_2, 'c' from dual
15 union all
16 select 5 tp, 0 sm_1, 0 sm_2, 'a' from dual
17 union all
18 select 5 tp, 0 sm_1, 0 sm_2, 'b' from dual
19 union all
20 select 5 tp, 0 sm_1, 0 sm_2, 'c' from dual)
21 select tp, SUM(sm_1), SUM(sm_2), code from t
22 group by tp, code
23 /
TP SUM(SM_1) SUM(SM_2) CODE
1 0 1 a
1 0 2 b
2 3 0 c
3 0 2 a
4 0 1 a
4 2 3 b
4 2 3 c
5 0 0 a
5 0 0 b
5 0 0 c
10 rows selected
SQL>
And I want to get this result
TP SUM(SM_1) SUM(SM_2) CODE
1 0 1 a
1 0 2 b
2 3 0 c
3 0 2 a
4 0 1 a
4 2 3 b
4 2 3 c
5 0 0 a
E.g. if SM_1 = SM_2(all of the rows) In group of tp, then return random rows with tp = 5, if
5 0 0 c
5 1 2 a
5 3 1 b
then return
5 1 2 a
5 3 1 b
And I don't undersatnd how it's do with Having Clause.
Thank you!

SQL> with t as (
2     select 1 tp, 0 sm_1, 1 sm_2, 'a' code from dual
3     union all
4     select 1 tp, 0 sm_1, 2 sm_2, 'b' from dual
5     union all
6     select 2 tp, 3 sm_1, 0 sm_2, 'c' from dual
7     union all
8     select 3 tp, 0 sm_1, 2 sm_2, 'a' from dual
9     union all
10     select 4 tp, 0 sm_1, 1 sm_2, 'a' from dual
11     union all
12     select 4 tp, 2 sm_1, 3 sm_2,'b' from dual
13     union all
14     select 4 tp, 2 sm_1, 3 sm_2, 'c' from dual
15     union all
16 select 5 tp, 0 sm_1, 0 sm_2, 'a' from dual
17 union all
18 select 5 tp, 0 sm_1, 0 sm_2, 'b' from dual
19 union all
20 select 5 tp, 0 sm_1, 0 sm_2, 'c' from dual)
21 select tp, sm_1, sm_2, code
22 from   (select tp,
23                 SUM(sm_1) sm_1,
24                 SUM(sm_2) sm_2,
25                 code,
26                 count(*) over (partition by tp) ct_tp,
27                 count(*) over (partition by tp, SUM(sm_1), SUM(sm_2)) ct,
28                 row_number() over (partition by tp order by null) rn
29          from t
30          group by tp, code)
31 where   decode(ct,ct_tp,rn,1)=1
32 and     case when sm_1 = 0 and sm_2 = 0 and ct_tp-ct > 0 then 0 else 1 end = 1;
        TP       SM_1       SM_2 C
         1          0          1 a
         1          0          2 b
         2          3          0 c
         3          0          2 a
         4          0          1 a
         4          2          3 b
         4          2          3 c
5 0 0 a
8 rows selected.
SQL> with t as (
2     select 1 tp, 0 sm_1, 1 sm_2, 'a' code from dual
3     union all
4     select 1 tp, 0 sm_1, 2 sm_2, 'b' from dual
5     union all
6     select 2 tp, 3 sm_1, 0 sm_2, 'c' from dual
7     union all
8     select 3 tp, 0 sm_1, 2 sm_2, 'a' from dual
9     union all
10     select 4 tp, 0 sm_1, 1 sm_2, 'a' from dual
11     union all
12     select 4 tp, 2 sm_1, 3 sm_2,'b' from dual
13     union all
14     select 4 tp, 2 sm_1, 3 sm_2, 'c' from dual
15     union all
16 select 5 tp, 0 sm_1, 0 sm_2, 'a' from dual
17 union all
18 select 5 tp, 1 sm_1, 0 sm_2, 'b' from dual
19 union all
20 select 5 tp, 2 sm_1, 0 sm_2, 'c' from dual)
21 select tp, sm_1, sm_2, code
22 from   (select tp,
23                 SUM(sm_1) sm_1,
24                 SUM(sm_2) sm_2,
25                 code,
26                 count(*) over (partition by tp) ct_tp,
27                 count(*) over (partition by tp, SUM(sm_1), SUM(sm_2)) ct,
28                 row_number() over (partition by tp order by null) rn
29          from t
30          group by tp, code)
31 where   decode(ct,ct_tp,rn,1)=1
32 and     case when sm_1 = 0 and sm_2 = 0 and ct_tp-ct > 0 then 0 else 1 end = 1;
        TP       SM_1       SM_2 C
         1          0          1 a
         1          0          2 b
         2          3          0 c
         3          0          2 a
         4          0          1 a
         4          2          3 b
         4          2          3 c
5 1 0 b
5 2 0 c
9 rows selected.Nicolas.

Use of Where and having clause

Hi all,
I always have a doubt about use of HAVING and WHERE clause,
suppose I have table T1 with only one column C1
CREATE TABLE T1
(C1 VARCHAR2(1) );
which having data by following INSERT scripts
INSERT INTO T1 VALUES('A');
INSERT INTO T1 VALUES('B');
INSERT INTO T1 VALUES('C');
INSERT INTO T1 VALUES('A');
INSERT INTO T1 VALUES('B');
INSERT INTO T1 VALUES('A');
Now I want result as follows
C1 ==== COUNT(C1)
==============
B ===== 2
A ===== 3
So out of query 1 and 2 which approach is right ?
1) SELECT C1,COUNT(C1) FROM T1
WHERE C1<>'C'
GROUP BY C1
ORDER BY C1 DESC;
2) SELECT C1,COUNT(C1) FROM T1
GROUP BY C1
HAVING C1<>'C'
ORDER BY C1 DESC;
Edited by: user13306874 on Jun 21, 2010 2:36 AM

In SQL, it's always best to filter data at the earliest moment possible.
In your example the WHERE clause would be that moment:
SQL> explain plan for
2 select c1,count(c1)
3 from t1
4 where c1 != 'C'
5 group by c1
6* order by c1 desc;
Explained.
SQL> select * from table(dbms_xplan.display);
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
Plan hash value: 3946799371
| Id | Operation          | Name | Rows | Bytes |
|   0 | SELECT STATEMENT   |      |     5 |    10 |
|   1 | SORT GROUP BY     |      |     5 |    10 |
|* 2 |   TABLE ACCESS FULL| T1   |     5 |    10 |
Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
   2 - filter("C1"!='C')
18 rows selected.
SQL>As you can see the filter is applied during the scan of T1.
Whereas in the HAVING case:
SQL> explain plan for
2 select c1,count(c1)
3 from t1
4 group by c1
5 having c1 != 'C'
6* order by c1 desc;
Explained.
SQL> select * from table(dbms_xplan.display);
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
Plan hash value: 3146800528
| Id | Operation           | Name | Rows | Bytes |
|   0 | SELECT STATEMENT    |      |     6 |    12 |
|* 1 | FILTER             |      |       |       |
|   2 |   SORT GROUP BY     |      |     6 |    12 |
|   3 |    TABLE ACCESS FULL| T1   |     6 |    12 |
Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
   1 - filter("C1"!='C')
18 rows selected.
SQL>The scan is done after all groups have been computed: one of which was computed in vain, since it will be filtered away due to the HAVING clause.
In general I would use as a guideline: if you are not using aggregate functions in your HAVING clause predicate, then move that predicate to the WHERE portion of your query.
Edited by: Toon Koppelaars on Jun 21, 2010 11:54 AM

Having clause with Analytic function

can you pls let me know if we can use HAVING clause with analytic function
select eid,empno,sum(sal) over(partition by year)
from employee
where dept = 'SALES'
having sum(sal) > 10000I m getting error while using the above,
IS that we can use HAVING clause with partition by
Thanks in advance

Your having clause isn't using an analytical function, is using a regular aggregate function.
You also can't use analytical functions in the where clause or having clause like that as they are windowing functions and belong at the top of the query.
You would have to wrap the query to achieve what you want e.g.
SQL> ed
Wrote file afiedt.buf
1 select deptno, total_sal
2 from (
3        select deptno,sum(sal) over (partition by deptno) as total_sal
4        from   emp
5       )
6 group by deptno, total_sal
7* having total_sal > 10000
SQL> /
    DEPTNO TOTAL_SAL
        20      10875
SQL>

HAVING clause, or ORDER BY clause ....ERROR

hi i have following query which throws error plz find the solution for the query to go safe..
Select C.src_cd,
D.src_nm,
count(*) supp_clm_count,
(CASE WHEN A.clm_ttladjamt > 0 then A.clm_ttladjamt else A.clm_ttlreqamt END) as amount
From IWOWNER.WC_clm A,
IWOWNER.WC_clm_srvc B,
SHOWNER.WC_SRC C,
SHOWNER.WC_SRC_lang D
where A.clm_id = B.clm_id
and A.rcv_loc_id = C.src_id
and C.src_id = D.src_id
and TRANSLATE(A.clm_rqst_type_cd) = 'SUPPLIERCLAIM'
and TRANSLATE(A.clm_typ_cd) in ('WARRANTY','PRE-DELIVERY')
and DATE(A.clm_create_dt) between '01/01/2000' and '01/01/2010'
Group by C.src_cd, D.src_nm
ERROR:
SQLSTATE: 42803, SQLERRMC: CLM_TTLADJAMT
Message: An expression starting with "CLM_TTLADJAMT" specified in a SELECT clause, HAVING clause, or ORDER BY clause is not specified in the GROUP BY clause or it is in a SELECT clause, HAVING clause, or ORDER BY clause with a column function and no GROUP BY clause is specified

Hi,
With analytic function
/* Formatted on 2009/07/22 10:47 (Formatter Plus v4.8.8) */
SELECT DISTINCT c.src_cd, d.src_nm,
                COUNT (1) OVER (PARTITION BY c.src_cd, d.src_nm)
                                                               supp_clm_count,
                SUM (CASE
                        WHEN a.clm_ttladjamt > 0
                           THEN a.clm_ttladjamt
                        ELSE a.clm_ttlreqamt
                     END
                    ) OVER (PARTITION BY c.src_cd, d.src_nm) AS amount
           FROM iwowner.wc_clm a,
                iwowner.wc_clm_srvc b,
                showner.wc_src c,
                showner.wc_src_lang d
          WHERE a.clm_id = b.clm_id
            AND a.rcv_loc_id = c.src_id
            AND c.src_id = d.src_id
            AND a.clm_rqst_type_cd = 'SUPPLIERCLAIM'
            AND a.clm_typ_cd IN ('WARRANTY', 'PRE-DELIVERY')
            AND a.clm_create_dt BETWEEN TO_DATE ('01/01/2000', 'dd/mm/yyyy')
                                    AND TO_DATE ('01/01/2010', 'dd/mm/yyyy')

Subquery in the HAVING Clause

Hello all,
i'm getting error when i try to write sub query in having clause. check out my query
select ROUND( Count( distinct Sales2011_DIVDPTA.DIVDPTA_Item_Dept ),0) AS "F1" , ROUND( Count( Sales2011.Sales2011_DG1.Item_Season ),0) AS "F2"
from Sales2011.Sales2011_JT
INNER JOIN Sales2011.Sales2011_DG1 On Sales2011.Sales2011_DG1.DG1_ID =Sales2011.Sales2011_JT.DG1_ID
LEFT JOIN Sales2011.Sales2011_DIVDPTA On nvl(Sales2011.Sales2011_DIVDPTA.DIVDPTA_ITEM_DIVISION,' ')=nvl(Sales2011.Sales2011_DG1.Item_Division,' ')
AND nvl(Sales2011.Sales2011_DIVDPTA.DIVDPTA_ITEM_DEPT,' ')=nvl(Sales2011.Sales2011_DG1.Item_Dept,' ')
having ( ROUND( Count( Sales2011.Sales2011_DG1.Item_Season ),0)     in ( 0)
But it is not executed if I use the sub query in having clause
select ROUND( Count( distinct Sales2011_DIVDPTA.DIVDPTA_Item_Dept ),0) AS "F1" , ROUND( Count( Sales2011.Sales2011_DG1.Item_Season ),0) AS "F2"
from Sales2011.Sales2011_JT
INNER JOIN Sales2011.Sales2011_DG1 On Sales2011.Sales2011_DG1.DG1_ID =Sales2011.Sales2011_JT.DG1_ID
LEFT JOIN Sales2011.Sales2011_DIVDPTA On nvl(Sales2011.Sales2011_DIVDPTA.DIVDPTA_ITEM_DIVISION,' ')=nvl(Sales2011.Sales2011_DG1.Item_Division,' ')
AND nvl(Sales2011.Sales2011_DIVDPTA.DIVDPTA_ITEM_DEPT,' ')=nvl(Sales2011.Sales2011_DG1.Item_Dept,' ')
having ( ROUND( Count( Sales2011.Sales2011_DG1.Item_Season ),0)
in ( select   ROUND( Count(
Sales2011.Sales2011_DG1.Item_Season ),0) from    Sales2011.Sales2011_DG1 )
Error at Command Line:1 Column:0
Error report:
SQL Error: ORA-00979: not a GROUP BY expression
00979. 00000 - "not a GROUP BY expression"
*Cause:
*Action:any help ???

Sorry unintentionally i have posted my question here.
will you please elaborate this? Becoz i'm not using group by clause in both query. First query run successfully but as i put sub query in having clause it raised an error. will you tell where i'm committing mistake?
Aggregates in the HAVING clause do not need to appear in the SELECT list. If the HAVING clause contains a subquery, the subquery can refer to the outer query block if and only if it refers to a grouping column.Edited by: Oracle Studnet on Aug 14, 2011 11:28 PM

How to have Having clause in Group by

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for