Group Indicator for Tax Line Items

Hi,
Can anyone tell me where can we define Group Indicator for Tax Line Items
Thanks & Regards

1) If you are going to post your program code, you should only post the relevant part.
2) You certainly should take the time and effort to remove commented out code
3) This is not a training forum. Before posting questions you should search - not just this site, not just using a search engine, but your course notes. Run the program in debug, and put some effort into determining the error. Then ask a colleague to help. Only if all that fails, post here.
Thread locked.

Similar Messages

To Set Goods Receipt Indicator For Particular Line Items In SRM

Hi All,
i am working on BBP_DOC_CHANGE_BADI in SRM. i am trying to set the goods receipt indicator for particular line items based upon certain conditions. The values are being set in the badi. But when the Purchase Order is created in the backend R/3 i coudn't able to find the goods receipt indiactor being set..
i used this field to set the GR indicator
GR_IND = 'X'. " Goods Receipt Indicator
Can anyone help me in this?
helpfull answers will be rewarded....
Thanks,
Murali

To Murali and Christophe,
I have set the GR and GR non val indicator in CREATE_PO BADI but I face the following situation :
problem -
In case of multiple account assignment in the shopping cart, the R/3 transaction ME21N sets these flags.
The flag status determined as per EBP conditions is lost.
I need to retain the flag status as per EBP conditions even in this multiple account assignment scenario.
proposed solution -
- CREATE PO badi is already implemented in EBP and customised logic for GR and GR non valflag is in place.
- I create user exit in R/3 backend system in ME21N transaction
- I make RFC call in this user exit to EBP and check the table BBP_PDPSET for the shopping cart.
This is how I get the flag status as per EBP conditions and copy the same to R/3 thereby overriding the multiple account assignment check of the R/3 system.
issue -
When I tried to verify that I can check the BBP_PDPSET table from R/3, I found that this table is not having entries for all the records in CRMD_ORDERADM_I table.
For which shopping carts will the BBP_PDPSET table not be populated ?
thank you in advance,
Bhakti.

Substitution of Business Area for Tax Line Items for Invoices posted in MM

Hi
We have one Business Area for every company code. A substitution rule has been created to populate Business Area in Tax Line Items, while booking vendor invoice. The substitution rule has been defined as
Prerequite
Company Code = 1234 and GL = 1323232
Substitution
Business Area = 6668
The system is working fine, when the Vendor Invoice is posted through FI. However, when the vendor invoice is generated through MIRO or MIR7, the Business Area is not substituted.
In Table VWTYGB01, we have maintained BSEG-GSBER as a field allowed for substitution with Boolean Class 09.
We have created the susbstitution rule for Text and Assignment also and the rules are working fine for all document posted through FI and MM
Regards
Sanil
Sanil K Bhandari

Hi
Business Area is a sensitive field, agreed. However, the substitution rule is working fine for FI posted documents and the issue is in MM generated documents.
Regards
Sanil Bhandari

Business area not defaulted for tax line item

Hello Friends,
I am posting Customer invoice, when I simulate the invoice that time Output tax is automatically calculating the tax. My problem is, in the Output tax line item business area is required field which is appearing in display mode.
T code - OBXM. Here we will configure this and at the month end we will run the following transactions.
F.5D, F.5E.
I want to know step by step cinformation for this. If you have any documentation send it to [email protected]
Rams.N
Points will be assigned for the right answer

hi,
If you are using business area method then you want to create all sales tax GL with business area optional. And You create one GL like Tax clearing account(business area optional)and assign the same in OBXM against all the sales tax GLs.
Then you want to run F.5d and F.5e on everymonth.
govind.

Substitution for MIRO Business Area for tax line items

Hi All,
Our business requirement is updation of BA in tax line items during MIRO transaction. To fulfill this requirement i have written a substitution with user exit. Business user enters BA in bktxt . In user exit iam passing bktxt field to bseg-gsber. But BA is not updating in tax line items. Here iam giving the code which i have written in my user exit. Pls guide me what to do aprt from this.
IF bkpf-bktxt IS NOT INITIAL.
    t_gsber = bkpf-bktxt.
ENDIF.
IF bseg-hkont EQ '0000098511' OR bseg-hkont EQ '0000098521' OR bseg-hkont EQ '0000098583'.
    cobl-gsber = t_gsber.
ENDIF.
IF bseg-hkont EQ '0000098511' OR bseg-hkont EQ '0000098521' OR bseg-hkont EQ '0000098583'.
    bseg-gsber = t_gsber.
ENDIF.

update like below:-
UPDATE dbtab FROM TABLE itab. or
UPDATE (dbtabname) FROM TABLE itab.

Enhancement for tax line items to post Business area level

Hi Gurus,
My Client has Business area at state wise. he wants to state wise Tax reports.
Can any one help me how to post tax line items at Business area level.
Please help me if any one know how to do Enhancement on this.
Appreaciate your great help.
Regards,
Ashok

Hi Gurus,
Please help on above post.
Regards,
Ashok

Selection indicator for costing line items in production order

Dear all,
Do anyone know how to change field "AFVGD-SELKZ" of operation inside producion order? Any user-exit or standard program?
As content of field "AFVGD-SELKZ" is carried from routing. But is it possible to change in production order level?
Please kindly adivce.
Cheers,
Karen

Karen,
Let me give some more additional inputs, for an operation to become relevant for costing there are 2 options.
1. As Ramanujam suggested - Control Key.
2. In the Routing operation details you have a field to mark an <b>operation costing relevant this field takes priority over control key in defining the costing</b>. This field can be found in the operation details - General Data section of routing.
<b>Some tricks,</b>
What i mean here is a control key may not be relevant for costing, but still if this field is marked as costing relevant or percentage costs then this is the priority.
if this field is marked not relevant for costing and if the operation has a control key relevant for costing then in this case control key takes priority.
In short what i meant is that you need to consider both "Control key" as well as the operation costing relevancy defination field.
Hope this helps your understanding in resolving your problem....Reward your points if so,
Regards,
Prasobh

Profit Center Updation for Tax Line Items in MIRO

Hi,
I am facing the peculiar peoblem in ECC 5.0 version while doing the MIRO the system is not picking the correct profit center based on derivation rule which is already defined in 3KEI assignement instead it is going to the 'Dummy Profit Center'.How to come out this problem becz my rule is GL Acc,Val Area,Profit Center and I had already checked the customization it is ok.
So plz tell me is there is any SAP note,Enhancements to resovle this issue.
It is utmost urgent and I will give good points for you.
Thanx,
Best regards,
Edu

Hi,
Try SAP Note 105024, 409520. That might be of help.
Thanks
Krishna.

Tax line items when travel expenses are posted to intercompany

Hello Experts,
We are posting a expense report to a different cost center other than the Master cost center(IT0001). In this case system understanding as intercompany transaction and posting the travel expenses to different cost center and different company code. But the problem is when there is a tax calcualted, this tax is initially getting posted to original master cost center and again transfering the taxes to the intercompany cost center. this is creating an additional FI documents and also additional tax line items which is becoming very difficult for reconcilation.
can any one suggest me where could be the correction required in order to post the taxes to intercompany cost center in the first instance itself.
Thanks&Regards
Srinivas

Hi Srinivas,
Profit center was not picking for tax line item when we were doing multiple cost center in a TRIP. So we have activated "not deductible" in VST and it got worked.
Later when we got a Cross company employee vendor posting, tax line items are posting in both company codes.
So we have deactivated "not deductible" in VST and activated "set expense company code" in table T706K (to allow cross company code postings in TM)
And defined a new solution in New GL config for the first prblem.
We have not changed anything in "posting indicator" in OBCN, it was 2 (Separate line item) only. You should not change this.
All postings went fine.
Regards
SM

Document should not splitt to tax line items

Hi,
Document should not splitt for tax line items,currently it is happining how contol this.
Thanks and Reg

Hi,
Then in the document splitting configuration, you can remove the base item category for this TAx Item Category.
Regards,
SDNer

P.O. with different Tax codes for each line item.

Hi
I would like to know how the IV has been done for the P.O. with differnt tax codes for each line item. Since in MIRO at header level we can select only one tax code.

Hi
Raju,
It means we can post only one invoice at time i.e.for line item same taxcode is there.
e.g. If line item 10 has tax code A1, 20 has A2 then on header i can only select either A1 or A2 tax code & post invoice of that line item.

Fi document: different tax code for each line item

Dear All,
Our FI department needs to post FI documents by uploading the list of line items. For each line item (even when they have the same g/l account) tax code may be different from 0 to 10%. Also the tax code needs to be entered in EUR not in %. So for example they may need to post the folowing document:
          PstKey   Account    Amount     Tax amt
001     21          Vendor       95 EUR     Tax amount 5 EUR
002     50          GRIR          100 EUR
003     21          Vendor       90 EUR     Tax amount 10 EUR
004     50          GRIR          100 EUR
At the moment users have to post it manually. Tax rate cannot be restricted to allow tax from 0 to 10%.
Can you please advice what would be the best approach for them to make it? Providing they do want to upload the document not enter the items manually..
Thanks a lot in advance for your help!

Hi,
are there some messages during this process? Upload this list in foreground batch input execution. Verify if in stop point displays any messagem. If it is the case, go to OBA5 to change its status.
Let me know results.
regards

Determine grouping for bill line item

Hi,
I am doing some reporting on bills that have been issued (CC&B).
I can get bill line items from the following query;
SELECT B.BILL_ID, B.ACCT_ID, B.BILL_DT, B.DUE_DT,
S.BSEG_ID, S.SA_ID, S.PREM_ID,
L.*
FROM CI_BSEG S
INNER JOIN CI_BILL B
ON S.BILL_ID = B.BILL_ID
INNER JOIN CI_BSEG_CALC_LN L
ON L.BSEG_ID = S.BSEG_ID
--SELECT A PARTICULAR BILL, FOR EXAMPLE
WHERE B.BILL_ID = '927321294079'
--ONLY RETURN THOSE ITEMS THAT APPEAR
--IN THE SUMMARY SECTION ON THE BILL
--SPECIFIED
AND L.APP_IN_SUMM_SW = 'Y'
However, I am stuck in trying to figure out the grouping area that the line item appeared in in the bill. CI_BSEG_CL_CHAR tells me whether or not the item appeared on the bill, but not the grouping. The information that I need seems to be in the CI_RC_CHAR table, so the problem I am then faced with is how to link together bill line items with the rate component that is the source of the line item.
Any assistance would be much appreciated.
ec
Edited by: 866928 on 12/07/2011 21:49

I seem to have figured out the join...
--THE FOLLOWING QUERY GETS FROM BSEG_CALC_LINE
--TO THE RATE COMPONENT CHARACTERISTIC TABLE
SELECT * FROM CI_BSEG S
INNER JOIN CI_BSEG_CALC_LN L ON S.BSEG_ID = L.BSEG_ID
INNER JOIN CI_SA SA ON SA.SA_ID = S.SA_ID
INNER JOIN CI_SA_RS_HIST H ON SA.SA_ID = H.SA_ID
INNER JOIN CI_RS RS ON H.RS_CD = RS.RS_CD
INNER JOIN CI_RC RC ON RC.RS_CD = RS.RS_CD
INNER JOIN CI_RC_CHAR RC_CH
ON RC.RS_CD = RC_CH.RS_CD
AND RC.EFFDT = RC_CH.EFFDT
AND RC.RC_SEQ = RC_CH.RC_SEQ
Thanks,
ec

Incorrect field KNA1-STCEG in output list for input tax Line items-RFUMSV00

Hi all,
I found the incorrect field in RFUMSV00 - Advance Return for Tax on Sales/Purchases. If you want to configure the output list for Input tax: Line items, there is the field VAT Registration No. which has to be LFA1-STCEG, but there is incorrect field KNA1-STCEG. After that I cannot find the values for this field in my output.
In the output list for Output tax: Line items there is correct field in configuration /LFA1-STCEG/.
I tried to find some SAP notes but without avail.
Thanks for help.
Miroslav

Hi,
Please check the following OSS note:-
https://websmp230.sap-ag.de/sap(bD1lbiZjPTAwMQ==)/bc/bsp/spn/sapnotes/index2.htm?numm=736203
https://websmp230.sap-ag.de/sap(bD1lbiZjPTAwMQ==)/bc/bsp/spn/sapnotes/index2.htm?numm=640269
It is picked up from bseg-stceg and not from lfa1-stceg or kna1-stceg
Regards,
Gaurav

Group Asset indicator for tax dep. in asset master

Problem in group asset for tax dep
While creating asset master data, indicator for Group Asset is in non - changeable mode for tax depreciation under area 15. When we assign
group asset under Additional Specifications in the box Group Asset,
system is giving message - Group asset does not manage area 15. Message
no. AA809
We need this for calculating Group Depreciation.
All configure settings have been carried out. Detail list is as follows
1.created account determination, screen laylot rules, number range
intervals & asset class for Group Asset.
2.Specify Depreciation Area for Group Assets.
3.Specify Asset Classes for Group Asset (OAAX)
How to go ahead on this?
Pl advice.

Hi,
Remove the Identical tick mark in Tcode OABD for tax dep area
i think ur problem will be solved
Regrds
Govind yadav

Group Indicator for Tax Line Items

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for