Grouping of tax according to item level.

Hi,
Can any body help me how to group the items in row level and get the summary of Tax in PLD's
Regards,
Ruheena Tasneem

Hi Ruheena,
Suppose you want the total Amount for the document in A/R Invoice
attach this query as a formatted search
SELECT sum(taxsum), t0.docnum as "Doc Num" FROM OINV T0, INV4 T1
WHERE T0.Docentry = T1.Docentry
and T1.stacode = 'vat4'
and t0.docnum =$[OINV.DocNum]
group by t0.docnum
Like wise you can have different UDF for each tax code and you can
create respective query by changing T1.stacode in WHERE condition.
Using this you can have separate value for VAT 4,VAT 1,VAT 12.5,VAT 2.5
and like wise BED 16,ECess 2,HECess 1
You need to create UDF for each Tax code
and you are required to write Query for each tax code.
Hope above is op help to you.
BR
Samir Gandhi

Similar Messages

How to extract tax amount in item level from a Purchase order

Hi experts,
How to extract the tax amount data for each item in a Purchase order.
I am using the data sources 2lis_02_itm, 2lis_02_scl, 2lis_02_S012.
Please provide me which data source brings this tax amount data in item level and also the technical
field name of tax amount.
<Removed by moderator - soliciting points for answers is frowned upon>
Regards,
Bhadri M.
Edited by: Arun Varadarajan on Nov 14, 2008 3:55 PM

Dear Bhadri
Did you look 2LIS_13_VDKON data source whther it can throw or not for billing related. Here you should look some billing conditions relates to particular document like taxable or not.
(KAWRT, KAWRT_K, BIWGEO)
Those informations will be maintained each with billing conditions.
May not sure. Please look.
Raju Saravanan

Sales Tax Calc (Line Item level calc versus header level calc)

Hello,
My company utilizes vertex to calculate sales and use tax in our sales orders that are created via resource related billing (DP96).
We store tax code O1 using condition type UTXJ for each SD Contract.
Condition types XR1 thru XR6 receive the sales tax calculations/amounts from vertex for EACH line in the billing request.
See below example of calculated tax amount per line item
Line1 of Bilreq:   NetVal 2.25     X tax rate for XR1 .05 = sales tax of 0.11 (rounded up to 2 decimal places)
Line2 of Bilreq:   NetVal 2.25     X tax rate for XR1 .05 = sales tax of 0.11 (rounded up to 2 decimal places)
Totals                             4.50                                                                  0.22
When our invoice(billing document) is sent to our customer which shows just totals our customer sees:
Net Amout: 4.50
tax rate .05
Sales Tax Amt: 0.22
When our customer multiplies 4.50 by .05 they come up to 0.23
So they are questioning why the calculation is incorrect and they want it to match to the penny.
Anyone have any suggestions to solve this problem.
Any help is greatly appreciated.
Thanks,
Ermanno Incollingo

Hello Ermanno
Does your pricing Procedure have condition type DIFF just after the tax conditions XR 1-6? If not, please review standard pricing procedure RVAXUS ( Step 917).
Also try to use condition types NETP and PNTP as described in OSS note 80183 - Rounding.
Hope this helps. Thanks.

Recaluculation of taxes at item level based on the value given in ZZ field

Dear all,
We have added a custom field for ALT BP TAX Grp at item level of service order. Whenever user changes the BP Tax Grp using this field at item level, we want the system to re-determine the taxes based on this new value of BP tax group bypassing the one given at BP master level.
1)     How can this be achieved?
2)     Can I use CRM_PRIDOC_COM_BADI BADI for this purpose
3)     Can I make the system trigger this BADI or any other relevant BADI for recalculation of taxes
                on the change event of the ZZ field we added?
Regards,
Parthasarathy

Did you get solution?
If so please update the message. I have similar requirement.
Regards,
Laxman

GPP item-level targeting filter not working as expected

I am trying to set the Internet Explorer homepage via user Group Policy Preferences (GPP) registry setting for a very specific group of users. I am using item-level targeting to accomplish this but am having trouble getting the logic working as expected.
Here is my item-level targeting filter:
The user is a member of the security group CONTOSO\FireRescueDept
AND this collection is false
The user is a member of the security group CONTOSO\EmergencyManagementDept
OR the user is a member of the security group CONTOSO\PublicSafetyDivision
The user in question is a member of both CONTOSO\FireRescueDept and CONTOSO\EmergencyManagementDept. I believe this means that this particular registry GPP setting should NOT apply to the user in question and that is the outcome I desire.
Here is how I'm thinking about it:
The user is a member of CONTOSO\EmergencyManagementDept; therefore, "The user is a member of the security group CONTOSO\EmergencyManagementDept" evaluates to TRUE.
Since the other item in the collection is connected with the boolean OR operator, the collection evaluates to TRUE regardless of the evaluation of "The user is a member of the security group CONTOSO\PublicSafetyDivision."
The item-level targeting filter is looking for the collection to evaluate to FALSE. Since the collection has evaluated to TRUE, the evaluation "This collection is false" is FALSE.
Because of the AND operator in front of "This collection is false", both "The user is a member of the security group CONTOSO\FireRescueDept" and "This collection is false" must evaluate to TRUE in order for the item-level targeting
filter to determine that the user in question to apply the GPP setting the filter is attached to. However, since "This collection is false" has already evaluated to FALSE, the filter as a whole should evaluate to FALSE and this GPP setting
should not apply.
However, according to gpresult it does apply.
Please advise. I want this particular setting to apply to users in the CONTOSO\FireRescueDept group unless they are a member of CONTOSO\EmergencyManagementDept and/or CONTOSO\PublicSafetyDivision.

Am 21.05.2013 16:22, schrieb Scott W. Sander:
> Does item-level targeting not work with Universal security groups
> because the group policy client isn't able to determine that the user
> is a member of groups of that type?
In my experience, it DOES work with universal groups... Are you
suffering from token bloat? How many groups is the user a member of?
http://blogs.technet.com/b/shanecothran/archive/2010/07/16/maxtokensize-and-kerberos-token-bloat.aspx
NO THEY ARE NOT EVIL, if you know what you are doing:
Good or bad GPOs?
Wenn meine Antwort hilfreich war, freue ich mich über eine Bewertung! If my answer was helpful, I'm glad about a rating!

Tax code is not flipping in invoice item level.

Hi Gurus,
I am facing one issue while creating MIRO transaction.when i am changing the tax code at header level .tax code is not changing at item level based on header level.and i am enabling the Tax flag indicator to NO.
but this functionality working fine in Quality and development system not in production !!
kindly advice me how to solve this issue . is it a configuration issue?
regards
prasad.

HI,
I am facing one issue while creating MIRO transaction.when i am changing the tax code at header level .tax code is not changing at item level based on header level.and i am enabling the Tax flag indicator to NO.
If you change tax code at header level then you calculation will be according to that tax code ,check your tax value in header
once you check tax code in header level then why you want to change it in item level now ?
check tax calculation first it is correct or not .
Regards
kailas Ugale

Price Group at Header and Item level

Hi All,
From the documentation, I understand that 'Price Group' field in customer master can be used when I have to group customer according to different pricing types which I would maintain in VK11. What I am confused about is, if this field is customer specific, why do I have this field at Item level as well in sales transaction? if we want, changing it only at Sales order header level would not be logical?
For exe, I have three pricing types which determine the price of any material. Price Type 1, Price Type 2, Price Type 3
In VK11, I would maintain conditions like :
Price Type 1/Customer A/material property 1 : INR 200
Price Type 1/Customer A/material property 2 : INR 220
Thanks,
Binita

hi binita,
this is to inform you that:
1) is there any limit to the maximum number of price list that can be maintained? currently, the client has approax, 1000 such pricing types.
1.a. no there is no limitation for this price list because it a table with maintaince view as there is not limitations for maintaince views.
2) Is there any way to make this field mandatory in sales transaction? it is not mandatory to have it in customer master. but as soon as the user selects customer, if no price list is there by default, he should not be allowed to proceed. such setting is possible in standard settings?
2.a. there are two methods keep the field in item VBKD-PLTYP or header level VBKD-PLTYP incompletion log - to fill up
or
to make the field mandatory you have to open the PROGRAM : SAPMY45A & SCREEN 4900 and make it mandatory at item level.
balajia
Edited by: balaji timmampalli achari on Dec 8, 2010 9:17 AM

DISCOVERER: grouping different set of data according to hierarchy level

Hi,
This is my problem:
I have a classic hierarchy like the following:
Region->City->Department->Store name
In my fact table are stored some measures about product.
Each product belong to a category (the category is another dimension in the fact table).
I have to group togheter different set of category dynamically according to the level of hierarchy where user is during drilling operation.
An example:
where i am at Region level i have to group the category product 100 and 200
if i drill down to the City level i have to group the categoty product 300 and 400.
How can i do this at runtime (ie: during the navigation of the report)
Thanks in advance,
The discoverer version is 10.1.2
P.S.sorry for my bad english

Hi
As mentioned above u can create an MP on top of the cubes. But in Report u will have to use only those characteristics which are common between the two cubes or the records will come in 2 rows. Say in ur case u cant use Item No and Doc No. But if u dont have any complex calculations u can use 'Constant selection' to get the records in the same row.
Regards,
Aparna

Difference - set g/l account by warehouse,item group,item level

hi all,
Pl. explain what is difference between setting
g/l accounts by warehouse,item group,item level ?
Jeyakanthan

Hi Jeyakanthan,
Let us consider an example that will make you understand this better. Consider that you are creating GRN's for Item A and Item B. The accounts that get updated are :
1. Inventory Account/Stock account: gets debited
2. Goods Received Not Invoiced Account : Gets Credited.
Now let us consider that Item A has been grouped under the item Group Raw Materials and Item B has been grouped under Item group Finished Goods. Now as mentioned above if you choose the Set G/L accounts by as Item Group in the Accounting tab of the item Group Raw Materials you will have to choose the Inventory/Stock Account as Inventory - Raw Material and for the Item Group Finished Goods the Inventory/Stock account has to be Inventory- Finished Goods. In all cases the Goods Received not Invoicved account will remain the same.When you create the GRN's the respective Inventory accounts will get debited and when you create the A/P Invoice for these the Goods Received Not Invoiced account will get Debited and the Vendor account will get credited.
Now in case if your company manages goods according to the Warehouse i.e. if the company has different warehouses for different types of goods like Raw Material warehouse for Raw Materials , Finished Goods warehouse for Finished goods then you should set the G/L accounts by Warehouse so that in the item master in the inventory Tab the respective warehouse is chosen and the relevant accounts are updated. Just for example when you choose Set G/L accounts by Warehouse for item A then in the accounting tab of the Raw Material Warehouse choose Inventoty - Raw material.
In the 3rd case consider that you are buying a Machine to be used in your workshop which is costing you around Rs. 10,00,000/- and the management wants to know the monthly utilisation costing of the machine like power, labour charges and overheads for that particular machine then it is better to define G/L accounts based on that item i.e. if Item C is a machine for which the Management wants to know the costing details then it would be better off defining a G/L account as Inventory - Item C. This option is better to be used for capital goods or Fixed assets.
For better understanding in the item master you need to initialise thru the Form settings the various G/L accounts like Goods received Not Invoiced accounts, Inventory accounts , Allocation Cost account etc.
Hope this calrifies matters.
Nagesh.

User-exit that split at item level according to bill of entry(BOE)

HI,
need to write the logic for splitting invoices at item level according to BOE.
Customized new table:
Info for the customized table:
Table Name:     ZIN_BONDINV
Field Name          Data Element          Type          Length     Short Text
MANDT          MANDT          CLNT          03          Client
VBELN          VBELN_VF          CHAR          10          Billing Document
EXNUM          J_1IEXCNUM     CHAR          10          BOE or Excise Invoice #
EXYEAR          J_1IEXYEAR          NUMC     04          Excise Year
ZEILE               J_1IZEILE1          NUMC     04          Item no - GR at depot
ZVBELN          VBELN_VL          CHAR          10          Delivery Number
Z POSNR          POSNR_VL          CHAR          06          Delivery item
ZWERKS          WERKS_D          CHAR          04          Plant
This table to be used for storing the invoice created using delivery document along with other information extracted during billing document creation.
Logic for populating the table:
User Exit: RV60AFZC
Form: USEREXIT_FILL_VBRK_VBRP
This user exit should be used to update records in the customized table for the data with which billing document is created. The data should be populated as follows:
     VBELN     =     VBRK-VBELN
     EXNUM     =     J_1IRG23D-EXNUM*
     EXYEAR     =     J_1IRG23D-EXYEAR*
     ZEILE          =     J_1IRG23D-ZEILE*
     ZVBELN     =     VBRP-VGBEL
     ZPOSNR     =     VBRP-VGPOS
     ZWERKS     =     VBRP-WERKS
*The above data is read during splitting the billing document based on BOE (copy control routine 602) and should be used from there.

USER-EXIT NAME IS RV60AFZZ

Validation on 'MATERIAL GROUP' at item level as well as service sub line it

Hi friends,
my requirement is to put validation on 'MATERIAL GROUP' at item level as well as service sub line item level.
Pls help me with exit/badi.
Ganesh Shete

Hi Ganesh,
For main line item you can use EXIT EXIT_SAPMM06E_017 or BADI ME_PROCESS_PO_CUST.For doing validation at service sub-line item level use EXIT EXIT_SAPLMLSP_030.
Hope this helps.

WHT (Witholding Tax / TDS) at PO line item level

Hi
There is one new functionality in SAP where i can enter WHT (Witholding Tax / TDS) at PO line item level. This functionality is introduced by SAP.
I searched PO line item for WHT code field in PO. But i didn't got this field. Please let me know how can i activate WHT field in PO line item level itself.
We are on SAP EHP5.

Dear Deepak,
WHT is basically add in vendor when you are creating. Goto XK03 select he WHT view.
for more information please check following URL
http://sapdocs.info/sap/fico/sap-extended-withholding-tax-configuration/
Regards,
PK.

EDI invoice failed for Service- multiple tax code at service item level

Hi Guys,
Please understand below scenarios, it is very critical to our client.
purchase order has 3 parent
line item which having the 3 services with tax code (P1-P1-P1 and P2-P2-P2 and (P2-P1-C1)
(P1=10%, P2=10% and C1=10%)
PO Outbound Idoc -
Similar tax codes(P1-P1-p1 and P2-P2-P2) - Carries total tax amount and
tax rate at parent level also it carries indvidual service line item
tax amount and tax rate at service item level
Mulitple tax codes(P2-P1-C1)- Carries only total tax amount at parent
level and no tax rate at parent level. It carries indvidual service
line item tax amount and tax rate at service item level
SES Outbound Idoc -
Similar tax codes(P1-P1-p1 and P2-P2-P2) - Carries total tax amount at
parent level segment and tax rate at parent item level also it carries
indvidual service line item tax amount and tax rate at service item
level
Mulitple tax codes(P2-P1-C1)- Carries only total tax amount at parent
level and no tax rate at parent level. It carries indvidual service
line item tax amount and tax rate at service item level
But while creating the invoice for parent line item which includes 3
services, it carries correct tax amount(as per PO and SESR) but it is
asking for tax rate at parent level not at service item level.
It is working fine for similar tax code at service line item (e.g P1-P1-p1 for 3 services or P2-P2-P2 for all 3 services) but when we use the combination of tax code or multiple tax code at service line items (e.g. P2-P1-C1), the inbound Idoc gets failed.
Expectation - How EDI invoice posted for mulitple Services under one parent line item which having multiple tax codes at service item level
Thanks
Sanjay
9930851236

This is an ongoing problem with lots of clients - did anyone solve it ?

Item level targeting not hitting nested security group

Hi guys,
Got two security groups (A & B). Group B is a member of A.
We've applied item level targeting with security groups. We've chose a bunch of drive maps to apply to Group A (which I was hoping would apply to Group B also.
The drive maps appear for the users of Group A but not Group B. Is this expected behaviour?
Any help appreciated. Thanks

Hi guys,
Got two security groups (A & B). Group B is a member of A.
We've applied item level targeting with security groups. We've chose a bunch of drive maps to apply to Group A (which I was hoping would apply to Group B also.
What is your forest functional level? I am not sure, but if I recall correctly if your forest functional level is 2008 R2, I guess you should experience no problems. Otherwise you need a workaround solution like a custom script and etc.
Mahdi Tehrani |
|
www.mahditehrani.ir
Please click on Propose As Answer or to mark this post as
and helpful for other people.
This posting is provided AS-IS with no warranties, and confers no rights.
How to query members of 'Local Administrators' group in all computers?

Sales order item level -tax

hi,
in sales order item level -billing tab tax classification indicators boxes are not coming.
i'm trying to configure taxinn in ecc 6.0
Pl suggest

Dear SAP SD,
This is Material Tax classification field so,
Check the material master of that material(Sales order material) in the Sales:sales org.1 view whether have you maintaining tax classification for that material or not.
If not maintained check the settings in the IMG regarding material master tax settings
IMG->Sales and Distribution>Basic functions>Taxes>Define Tax Relevancy Of Master Records--->Material Taxes here you can maintain proper tax category and tax classification for the material master.
Now you maintain proper tax classification in the material master record then try.
I hope this will help you,
Regards,
Murali.

Grouping of tax according to item level.

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for