H.264 All-Intra Data Rates Significantly Higher

Does the built-in H.264 codec encode I-frame only files differently? I am trying to determine the optimal GOP length for high bitrate exports. Image quality seems to degrade, even in the I-frames, when using key frame distances greater than one.
After performing a series of tests to characterize the Adobe H.264 encoder, I discovered that exported files are significantly larger when key frame distance equals one frame (N=1). The average video data rate for a test file rendered with the Adobe H.264 encoder is as follows:
N=1 : 2.17 bpp : 24I
N=2 : 0.66 bpp : 12I + 12P
N=3 : 0.59 bpp : 8I + 8B + 8P
Note how the data rate drops 70% (from 2.17 to 0.66 bpp) even though 50% of the I-frames still exist when N=2. By comparison, here is the video data rate when exporting with QuickTime H.264:
N=1 : 0.89 bpp : 24I
N=2 : 0.70 bpp : 12I + 12P
N=3 : 0.64 bpp : 8I + 16P
The following chart shows data rates at key frame distances from 1-48 frames for Adobe H.264, QuickTime H.264 (via Adobe), QuickTime Pro, and Expression Encoder 4 Pro. Data rates are consistent among all encoders at GOP lengths greater than one. There is an anomoly with the Adobe H.264 codec compressing all-intra files.
The observed behavior occurs in all profiles, which were tested at Levels 4.1, 4.2, 5.0, and 5.1:
Image quality is better in the Adobe H.264 all-intraframe file, especially with respect to detail retention. The pictures below show sections of two consecutive frames magnified 400%. The file with N=2 is less accurate and contains noticeable blocking. Even the I-frames don't look as good in the files where N>1.
The test file was a seventeen second Premiere Pro sequence consisting of H.264, MPEG-2, and AE files with effects applied. Exports were rendered from the Premiere Pro timeline and from a V210 uncompressed 4:2:2 intermediate file of the sequence. The following settings were used:
Format: H.264
Width: 1280
Height: 720
Frame Rate: 24 fps
Field Order: Progressive
Aspect: Square Pixels (1.0)
TV Standard: NTSC
Profile: Baseline, Main, and High
Levels: 4.1, 4.2, 5.0, 5.1
Render at Maximum Bit Depth: Enabled
Bitrate Encoding: VBR, 2-Pass
Target Bitrate: Maximized for each Profile/Level
Maximum Bitrate: Maximized for each Profile/Level
Key Frame Distance: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 12, 24, 48
Use Maximum Render Quality: Enabled
Multiplexer: MP4
Stream Capability: Standard
Software:
Adobe Media Encoder CS6 Creative Cloud v6.0.3.1 (64-bit)
Premiere Pro CS6 Creative Cloud v6.0.3
Windows 7 SP1
QuickTime Pro for Windows v7.6.9 (1680.9)
MediaInfo 0.7.62 (for GOP and data rate information)

I think the short answer is yes,
a h.264 encoder does I-frame only differently. I frames are complete expressions of a picture with no temporal compression information.
P frames use _P_redictive information. IE information from prior frames.
B frames use _B_i-directional predictive frame information.
h.264 gets the majority of it's bit saving from use of B and P frames. When you do I-frame only you only get the block compression and none of the advantages of P and B frames. Thus the GOP N=1 doesn't get very good bit's per pixel.
Having said all that I do find your comment...
Profitic wrote:
Note how the data rate drops 70% (from 2.17 to 0.66 bpp) even though 50% of the I-frames still exist when N=2. By comparison, here is the video data rate when exporting with QuickTime H.264:
... very interesting. Indeed, why is the datarate 70% less when it should at best be 50% for GOP N=2. 50% less should be the same I-frame information plus 0 bytes for the B frame between them. (GOP = I,B,I). Any more than that and it is throwing away bits from the I-frame. So, this seems to be to be a ratecontrol bug.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Group_of_pictures
"The GOP structure is often referred by two numbers, for example, M=3, N=12. The first number tells the distance between two anchor frames (I or P): it is the GOP size. The second one tells the distance between two full images (I-frames): it is the GOP length. For the example M=3, N=12, the GOP structure is IBBPBBPBBPBBI. Instead of the M parameter the maximal count of B-frames between two consecutive anchor frames can be used."

Similar Messages

  • Another Data Rate Too High Error Question

    Hi all,
    I have seen quite a few posts about pgc errors, but most of them deal with slideshows and not video; and I can't find anything with the REF=KApgc error.
    I'm just putting all of my home movies onto an authored DVD, not rocket science.  I'm using the 'Film Submenu' preset with only 5 main movies, things like Easter, Birthday, etc.  My transition for each button is a slate (for lack of a better word) that says exactly what it is and when it happened, before each movie plays.
    After I had everything set up, I realized I didn't have an ability to "play all" that would include these slates.  Simple solution, make a 'play all' button that links to a timeline that has everything in it - the slate, then the movie, next slate, next movie and so on.  (When I say movie - they are all .mov files rendered out from After Effects, even the slates)
    My transcode settings are NTSC DV High Quality 7mb VBR 2 Pass and the "maximum quality" box is checked.
    When I run the 'Check Disc' all is fine.  Preview the disc, all is fine.
    Build Disc: Hours of Transcoding then the error: Data Rate Too High at *timecode* REF=KApgc.
    When this movie is by itself with a button click, it's fine.  It's only in the "play all" timeline that it produces the error.
    If the data rate isn't too high in one place, why is it too high in another?  It's the same thing, just a longer timeline.
    Please Help!
    Thanks.

    Thanks Jeff,
    I feel kind of silly for not thinking of that as a solution to my play all dilemma.  That's why you're the expert I guess.
    A better solution would be to create a playlist of all of your other timelines; that way, only one copy of each gets burned to disc.
    Hopefully the "data rate" error will go away with these changes.
    -Jeff
    Can I place my slates that are just assets (.mov) in the playlist or can I only put timelines in there?
    Thanks again,
    -Jim

  • Why do I get data rate too high error after capture and save? (using AJA Kona)

    I record(capture) about an 70 min program with Adobe premiere CS5 once a week. About a year ago I got the error *data rate too high" when stopping "capture" when saving program to Video HD(2TB). The video recorded was OK but after about 15 min the audio was out of sync and garbled. I thought I had found the problem by defragging the video drive. I have not had any problems for about 50 weeks.. until this week-it happened again. I know the video drive(2TB) was defragged and only half full. I was able to recover the program since I back up the program on a DVD but had to go through a lot of problems massaging it since I send the program to a local ABC broadcast station in 16/9 SD and the DVD is rescored in 4/3 .
    I have the CS5 program on a separate 2.5 GB drive. I am running Win7pro and have a RAID series of Intel Xeon ES410 processors.
    Any help as to why I get this "Data Rate too High" when saving program would be appreciated.
    Thanks much!

    I have three Mitsubishi broadcast quality cameras (two HD -waiting on money for switcher and 3rd HDcamera). They feed to their camera control untints and then to a switcher and then into video computer and the C5S. I probably am not answering your question. I can access the computers from my home(I also have a CG computer). Is there some way I can tell you from the C5S program which the info you need? I have it ready to record for next week.
    I know how to manipulate various functions but I do not know all the ins and outs of the Premiere settings-an IT man set those up for me two years and he is no longer available.
    Thanks

  • Problem making slideshow. "Data rate to high"

    Using Encore CS3 on Win XP. Trying make dvd on a short film and some slideshows. Total c 2,5 GB. Building stops telling me: PGC "Lenas" has an error at 00:01:31:08. The data rate is too high for DVD. You must replace the file with one of a lower rate.....ref, EPGC...." All pictures in slideshow "Lenas" are the same size, 2-2,5 MB, nothing special with the picture at 00:01:31:08. What does the info say?
    Preview with no problems.
    Regards Gunnar Löwenhielm

    What are the pixel x pixel dimensions of those still images?
    What is your Encore Project setting?
    How many images do you have per SlideShow?
    Good luck,
    Hunt

  • PGC...data rate too high

    Hallo,
    message
    nunew33, "Mpeg not valid error message" #4, 31 Jan 2006 3:29 pm describes a certain error message. The user had problems with an imported MPEG movie.
    Now I receive the same message, but the MPEG that is causing the problem is created by Encore DVD itself!?
    I am working with the german version, but here is a rough translation of the message:
    "PGC 'Weitere Bilder' has an error at 00:36:42:07.
    The data rate of this file is too high for DVD. You must replace the file with one of a lower data rate. - PGC Info: Name = Weitere Bilder, Ref = SApgc, Time = 00:36:42:07"
    My test project has two menus and a slide show with approx. 25 slides and blending as transition. The menus are ok, I verified that before.
    First I thought it was a problem with the audio I use in the slide show. Because I am still in the state of learning how to use the application, I use some test data. The audio tracks are MP3s. I learned already that it is better to convert the MP3s to WAV files with certain properties.
    I did that, but still the DVD generation was not successful.
    Then I deleted all slides from the slide show but the first. Now the generation worked!? As far as a single slide (an image file) can not have a bitrate per second, and there was no sound any more, and as far as the error message appears AFTER the slide shows are generated, while Encore DVD is importing video and audio just before the burning process, I think that the MPEG that is showing the slide show is the problem.
    But this MPEG is created by Encore DVD itself. Can Encore DVD create Data that is not compliant to the DVD specs?
    The last two days I had to find out the cause for a "general error". Eventually I found out that image names must not be too long. Now there is something else, and I still have to just waste time for finding solutions for apparent bugs in Encore DVD. Why doesn't the project check find and tell me such problems? Problem is that the errors appear at the end of the generation process, so I always have to wait for - in my case - approx. 30 minutes.
    If the project check would have told me before that there are files with file names that are too long, I wouldn't have had to search or this for two days.
    Now I get this PGC error (what is PGC by the way?), and still have no clue, cause again the project check didn't mention anything.
    Any help would be greatly appreciated.
    Regards,
    Christian Kirchhoff

    Hallo,
    thanks, Ruud and Jeff, for your comments.
    The images are all scans of ancient paintings. And they are all rather dark. They are not "optimized", meaning they are JPGs right now (RGB), and they are bigger then the resolution for PAL 3:4 would require. I just found out that if I choose "None" as scaling, there is no error, and the generation of the DVD is much, much faster.
    A DVD with a slide show containing two slides and a 4 second transition takes about 3 minutes to generate when the scaling is set to something other than "None". Without scaling it takes approx. 14 seconds. The resulting movies size is the same (5,35 MB).
    I wonder why the time differs so much. Obviously the images have to be scaled to the target size. But it seems that the images are not scaled only once, that those scaled versions of the source images are cached, and those cached versions are used to generate then blend effect, but for every frame the source images seem to be scaled again.
    So I presume that the scaling - unfortunately - has an effect on the resulting movie, too, and thus influences the success of the process of DVD generation.
    basic situation:
    good image > 4 secs blend > bad image => error
    variations:
    other blend times don't cause an error:
    good image > 2 secs blend > bad image => success
    good image > 8 secs blend > bad image => success
    other transitions cause an error, too:
    good image > 4 secs fade to black > bad image => error
    good image > 4 secs page turn > bad image => error
    changing the image order prevents the error:
    bad image > 4 secs blend > good image => success
    changing the format of the bad image to TIFF doesn't prevent the error.
    changing colors/brightness of the bad image: a drastic change prevents the error. I adjusted the histogram and made everything much lighter.
    Just a gamma correction with values between 1.2 and 2.0 didn't help.
    changing the image size prevents the error. I decreased the size. The resulting image was still bigger than the monitor area, thus it still had to be scaled a bit by Encore DVD, but with this smaller version the error didn't occur. The original image is approx. 2000 px x 1400 px. Decreasing the size by 50% helped. Less scaling (I tried 90%, 80%, 70% and 60%, too) didn't help.
    using a slightly blurred version (gaussian blur, 2 px, in Photoshop CS) of the bad image prevents the error.
    My guess is that the error depends on rather subtle image properties. The blur doesn't change the images average brightness, the balance of colors or the size of the image, but still the error was gone afterwards.
    The problem is that I will work with slide shows that contain more images than two. It would be too time consuming to try to generate the DVD over and over again, look at which slide an error occurs, change that slide, and then generate again. Even the testing I am doing right now already "ate" a couple of days of my working time.
    Only thing I can do is to use a two image slide show and test image couple after image couple. If n is the number of images, I will spend (n - 1) times 3 minutes (which is the average time to create a two slides slide how with a blend). But of course I will try to prepare the images and make them as big as the monitor resolution, so Encore DVD doesn't have to scale the images any more. That'll make the whole generation process much shorter.
    If I use JPGs or TIFFs, the pixel aspect ratio is not preserved when the image is imported. I scaled one of the images in Photoshop, using a modified menu file that was installed with Encore DVD, because it already has the correct size for PAL, the pixel aspect ratio and the guides for the save areas. I saved the image as TIFF and as PSD and imported both into Encore DVD. The TIFF is rendered with a 1:1 pixel aspect ratio and NOT with the D1/DV PAL aspect ration that is stored in the TIFF. Thus the image gets narrowed and isn't displayed the way I wanted it any more. Only the PSD looks correct. But I think I saw this already in another thread...
    I cannot really understand why the MPEG encoding engine would produce bit rates that are illegal and that are not accepted afterwards, when Encore DVD is putting together all the stuff. Why is the MPEG encoding engine itself not throwing an error during the encoding process? This would save the developer so much time. Instead they have to wait until the end, thinking everything went right, and find out then that there was a problem.
    Still, if sometime somebody finds out more about the whole matter I would be glad about further explanations.
    Best regards,
    Christian

  • PE2 Data Rate too high

    I am trying to burn a 15 minute video straight to the DVD. During the burning process (after rendering for about 10 hours) I got the following message: "The data rate of this file is too high for DVD. You must replace the file with one of a lower data rate. -PGC Info: name=, ref=Apgc, time= 00:07:44:23"
    I successfully burned the same project a week ago; my only changes were adding some transitions and a few stills.
    My project is video (most converted from VHS), music (ripped from CD or itunes), Audio (narrative recorded at home) and stills (almost all reduced to ~300Kb).
    I am in the middle now of trying to burn to a file, but the error spooks me.
    Any thoughts

    Ned,
    Some place, you have set the Data-rate above the DVD-spec. of 10 MB/s for ALL Assets, or have spikes above that. Now, since this is for all streams, Audio + Video, something below 8 works best. Then, if there is a momentary spike, it falls below the threshold of 10. In your Export settings, this has been set to high, either by you, or the program. PE is pretty smart about spikes, but can get fooled by the Assets, sometimes.
    Check your output settings. I find that a setting of ~7 max. is better for player compatibility, though PE does allow one to go to 8 max.
    Hunt

  • Can subtitles cause data rate too high errors?

    I've been building a DVD in Encore CS5, using Sorenson as the transcoder.  I've built the disc many times with no issues.  Now I've added a Spanish subtitle track, and I am suddenly getting errors that the data rate is too high.  Can the subtitles cause this?
    These are my Sorenson settings.  Ultimately this will be a commercially pressed disc.  Do I need to adjust, and if so, how?
    Target 8400 kbps
    Min: 53% (4452)
    Max: 115% (9660)
    Total data rate: 8624
    2-pass VBR, 720x480.
    Audio: ATSC A/52
    Data rate: 224
    Sample: 48K
    Stereo, 16

    The question will be in part what the actual datarate is (and most particularly, datarate spikes). If we were using burned disks, I would worry. Since players don't have to play burned disks, they are less likely to be uniform in handling datarate variations. You are replicating; correct? So a player that fails to play correctly, is failing what it is supposed to do. As long as you are in spec, you should be okay.
    The other way to answer this: no, I would not trust Encore failing to throw an error as a sufficient guarantee. Does the replicator test for datarate?

  • I have a question about Data Rates.

    Hello All.
    This is a bit of a noob question I'm sure. I don't think I really understand Data Rates and how it applies to Motion... therefore I'm not even sure what kind of questions to ask. I've been reading up online and thought I would ask some questions here. Thanks to all in advance.
    I've never really worried about Data Rates until now. I am creating an Apple Motion piece with about 15 different video clips in it. And 1/2 of them have alpha channels.
    What exactly is Data Rate? Is it the rate in which video clip data is read (in bits/second) from the Disc and placed into my screen? In Motion- is the Data Rate for video only? What if the clip has audio? If a HDD is simply a plastic disc with a dye read by "1" laser... how come my computer can pull "2" files off the disc at the same time? Is that what data transfer is all about? Is that were RAM comes into play?
    I have crunched my clips as much as I can. They are short clips (10-15seconds each). I've compressed them with the Animation codec to preserve the Alpha channel and sized them proportionally smaller (320x240). This dropped their data rate significantly. I've also taken out any audio that was associated with them.
    Is data rate what is slowing my system down?
    The data rates are all under 2MBs. Some are as low as 230Kbs. They were MUCH higher. However, my animation still plays VERY slowly.
    I'm running a 3GigRam Powerbook Pro 2.33GHz.
    I store all my media on a 1TB GRaid Firewire 800 drive. However for portability I'm using a USB 2 smartdisk external drive. I think the speed is 5200rpm.
    I'm guessing this all plays into the speed at which motion can function.
    If I total my data rate transfer I get somewhere in the vicinity of 11MBs/second. Is that what motion needs for it to play smoothly a 11MBs/second data connection? USB 2.0 is like what 480Mbs/second. So there is no way it's going to play quickly. What if I played it from my hard drive? What is the data rate of my internal HDD?
    I guess my overall question is.
    #1. Is my thinking correct on all of these topics? Do my bits, bytes and megs make sense. Is my thought process correct?
    #2. Barring getting a new machine or buying new hardware. What can I do to speed up this workflow? Working with 15 different video clips is bogging Motion down and becoming frustrating to work with. Even if only 3-4 of the clips are up at a time it bogs things down. Especially if I throw on a glow effect or something.
    Any help is greatly appreciated.
    -Fraky

    Data rate DOES make a difference, but I'd say your real problem has more to do with the fact that you're working on a Powerbook. Motion's real time capabilities derive from the capability of the video card. Not the processor. Some cards do better than others, but laptops are not even recommended for running Motion.
    To improve your workflow on a laptop will be limited, but there are a few things that you can try.
    Make sure that thumbnails and previews are turned off.
    Make sure that you are operating in Draft Mode.
    Lower the display resolution to half, or quarter.
    Don't expect to be getting real time playback. Treat it more like After Effects.
    Compressing your clips into smaller Animations does help because it lowers the data rate, but you're still dealing with the animation codec which is a high data rate codec. Unfortunately, it sounds necessary in your case because you're dealing with alpha channels.
    The data rate comes into play with your setup trying to play through your USB drive. USB drives are never recommended for editing or Motion work. Their throughput is not consistent enough for video work. a small FW drive would be better, though your real problem as I said is the Powerbook.
    If you must work on the powerbook, then don't expect real-time playback. Instead, build your animation, step through it, and do RAM previews to view sections in real time.
    I hope this helps.
    Andy

  • Files failing to adhere to set data rate on export from Quicktime

    I am hoping somebody can shed some light on this.
    I open an uncompressed .mov file (output from FinalCut) with Quicktime with the intention of compressing it for the web. After File: export, in the options dialog box, in the field where you can restrict the data rate, I put a number, say 488 kbs/sec. But every time I do this, the finished compressed file has a data rate wildly higher, like 2000 kbs/sec, and so is too large for my purposes.
    I feel like I used to do this all the time- I have plenty of .mov files with data rates around 500 kbs/sec that I posted on my website, so this had to have worked at some time in the past.
    Anybody? Thanks

    Just a bump-

  • WLC Data Rates behaviour

    Hello everyone!
    I have some questions about the data rates configuration in WLC. I've been reading Cisco documentation and this forum, but as I've seen some contradictory information I would like you to clarify me some points.
    I want to disable 802.11b clients, so for that I'm going to disable 1, 2, 5.5 and 11Mbps data rates (other option could be set these as supported only). Then, I have to assign at least one of the other data rates as mandatory...
    I could think in one of these three options
    Option 1: all 802.11g data rates as mandatory. In this case, as far as I understand:
    Broadcast are sent to the lowest data rate
    Multicast are sent to the highest data rate (but if a client is connected to other data rate than the highest, then multicast frames are sent to this data rate supported by the client, is that right??). Basically, you cannot be sure at which data rate multicast frames are sent as it can change depending on the clients.
    Clients can connect as soon as they support one of the mandatory data rate
    Option 2: one 802.11g data rate as mandatory. This would define better the cell limits.
    Broadcast and multicast are sent at the same data rate
    Clients can connect if they support the mandatory data rate
    Option 3: set two data rates as mandatory (or the OFDM required data rates: 6,12, 24Mbps), and the others as supported
    Broadcast are sent at the lowest data rate
    Multicast are sent at the highest data rate (shifting back to the lowest if a customer cannot connect to this data rate)
    Clients can connect if they support at least one of the mandatory data rates.
    Am I right with this assumptions? I have read some other different behaviors, like broadcast and multicast are sent at the same common data rate...
    I hope I have explained myself...
    Thank you very much for your support.
    Carolina

    Hello,
    thank you Scott and George!
    I read the post, and it is ok, and I finally have found some information in Cisco's website:
    http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/wireless/controller/7-4/configuration/guides/consolidated/b_cg74_CONSOLIDATED/b_cg74_CONSOLIDATED_chapter_01011.html#ID2482
    "Access points running recent Cisco IOS versions transmit multicast frames at the highest configured basic rate and management frames at the lowest basic mandatory rates, can cause reliability problems. Access points running LWAPP or autonomous Cisco IOS should transmit multicast and management frames at the lowest configured basic rate. Such behavior is necessary to provide good coverage at the cell's edge, especially for unacknowledged multicast transmissions where multicast wireless transmissions might fail to be received. Because multicast frames are not retransmitted at the MAC layer, clients at the edge of the cell might fail to receive them successfully. If reliable reception is a goal, multicast frames should be transmitted at a low data rate. If support for high data rate multicast frames is required, it might be useful to shrink the cell size and disable all lower data rates.
    Depending on your requirements, you can take the following actions:
    If you need to transmit multicast data with the greatest reliability and if there is no need for great multicast bandwidth, then configure a single basic rate, that is low enough to reach the edges of the wireless cells.
    If you need to transmit multicast data at a certain data rate in order to achieve a certain throughput, you can configure that rate as the highest basic rate. You can also set a lower basic rate for coverage of nonmulticast clients."
    Based on your experience, does it have any sense to have configured all datarates as mandatory? This is the current configuration I have in our controllers but it wasn't done by me.
    Thanks.
    Carolina

  • Quick Notation Question - Data Rates/Frame Rates/Interlacing

    Finally upgraded to a decent prosumer camera and I'm trying to decipher what the manual is telling me about the many different formats it shoots and and the associated options.  I keep seeing things like "There are two basic shooting modes: 720p and 1080i/p.", which I'm finding confusing.  In my understanding, the "p" in 720p means progressive video and the "i" in 1080i means interlaced.  So what do I make of 1080i/p?
    On top of this, my camera shoots in "native" mode, which drops duplicate frames used in "over 60" formats.  This will give me variations in the notation like:
    720/24pN
    720p Native 60 fps
    1080i/24p
    1080/24PN
    Can someone give me a quick primer about frame rate vs data rate and explain how to read these notations?  I'd appreciate it quite a bit.
    Thanks!

    There are so many cameras, capable of so many different formats that providing a manufacturer and model could be helpful in this discussion.
    Jim's answer is absolutely correct but I'm going to re-state for clarification.
    The i/p designation means you can chose to record as interlaced or progressive for a given resolution.
    It sounds like your camera is designed to "capture" images at 60 frames per second, selecting "native" mode means extra frames are deleted and only the desired frames, based on frame rate setting, are recorded to memory. The advantage of "native" @ 24fps is you save space on your memory card. The advantage of NOT using "native" mode is that all 60 frames per second are recorded, but the file metedata tells playback software to only show the frames needed for the specified frame rate (i.e. 24). Since all 60 frames per second are recorded, you use more memory but you also have the option of retrieving all the those frames, if you so desire, at a later time (i.e. for smoother slo-mo).
    To be honest I don't know what your spec of 1080i/24p means. If that is truly an option then I would guess it means it will record a 24p image but the metedata would indicate the file should playback at 30fps interlaced by adding the proper 3:2 pulldown. This would give you that "film" look in a broadcast compatible format.
    For the most part, you don't want use use any interlaced settings. Very few display devices still in use can properly display interlaced images. Interlacing is only required in some broadcast specifications.
    To answer the second part of your question;
    Frame rates are an indication of how many times the moving image is captured over a given period (per second). Higher frame rates means smoother, more "real life" motion. Data rates can generally be considered an indication of image or audio quality. Higher levels of compression result in lower data rates and (generally) lower quality. If squeezing more hours of footage on fewer memory cards is more important than getting the best image quality, choose a lower data rate. Higher frame rates (more images per second) inherently require a higher data rate to retain the same quality as fewer frames at a lower data rate.

  • Variable data rate

    I have a question and I'm not 100% sure how to phrase it so Ill describe my problem and maybe someone can help me.
    Im working on a video composed of Gopro and DSLR footage (all converted to Prores LT). My problem is that the Gopro shots need to have a very high data rate because there is alot going on and lots of fast movement etc so the quality is only acceptable when the data rate is set to about 35 mbps. However, the DSLR footage doesnt need a data rate that high, the quality stays very high with data rates as low as ~ 6mbps (Im not exactly sure why that is? less movement maybe?).
    So I dont want to export an entire video at 35mbps because that is a HUGE file. Is there such thing as a variable data rate or does anyone have any suggestions for what exactly I could do here?
    Thank you in advance!

    I convert all my footage to Prores LT 1280x720 at 30 fps which gives my prores clips a data rate of approximately 42 mbps I believe? and yes I'm talking end use.
    Essentially what it comes down to is after I have complete editing my video in FCP and I compress it down for end use (vimeo/youtube) the only way the Gopro shots are any good is if I use an extremely high data rate (A data rate that probably isnt even supported by most video sites). There has to be a way to obtain decent quality on final compression because there are literally millions of videos out there that people have shot with gopros that are atleast decent quality. However I have found if I decrease my data rate to anything below 15 mbps the quality (of just the gopro shots) is so poor its unwatchable. Hence wondering if there was a way to set variable data rates so some of the clips are high  and others are low low? Or some other work around?

  • Bridge 1300 building to building link for VOIP Data Rates settings and QoS

    Hi,
    What are the recomendations for data rates settings of wlan fo using voip in a link building to building.
    Default is
    speed basic-1.0 basic-2.0 basic-5.5 6.0 9.0 basic-11.0 12.0 18.0 24.0 36.0 48.0
    54.0
    Should i maintain or change to what?
    Also what QoS should i apply?
    Thks
    Best Regards
    Marco

    OFDM is a physical layer encoding technology for transmitting signals through the RF. This method breaks one high-speed data carrier into several lower-speed carriers that transmit in parallel across the particular RF spectrum. OFDM, when used with various modulation types such as 802.11g and 802.11a, is capable of supporting data rates as high as 54 Mbps.
    http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/cuipph/7921g/5_0_1/english/administration/guide/7921wrnt.html#wp1085347

  • Upload Maximum Date Rate Lower Than Upload Data Ra...

    Hello there,
    I have just brought up my BT Home Hub 5 stats and my upload data rate is higher than my upload maximum date rate. Is this normal? My upload noise margin has dropped to 4.9 - 5.1 dB. I've had BT Infinity just over 2 days and was wondering if this was normal for FTTC connections?
    Many thanks,
    William

    normally the data rate will be lower than max data rate but yours is that close I would not bother unless it starts to affect your connection which is unlikely
    If you like a post, or want to say thanks for a helpful answer, please click on the Ratings star on the left-hand side of the post.
    If someone answers your question correctly please let other members know by clicking on ’Mark as Accepted Solution’.

  • Standard Video Compression Settings: Data Rate

    I have imported a VHS tape using a DV converter, but the file is huge, and I want it to be able to fit onto a DVD. The file size is around 25 GB, way to big of a file, especially for the video's quality. I am trying to compress it so I went to File: Export: QuickTime Conversion. From there I selected QuickTime Movie and clicked on options. A window came up called "Movie Settings" and under "video" I clicked on "settings". Under Compression Type I clicked H.264. Under "data rate" I clicked on "restrict to" and then there was a blank space to put in the kbits/sec. Under "Optimized for" I clicked on CD/DCD-ROM. I do not know how many kbits/sec I should have. I want to maintain the best possible quality while having it fit onto a DVD.

    Don't worry about file size at this point; the determining factor is program length. A single layer 4.7GB DVD will hold about two hours of video. The compression is handled in the DVD authoring application.
    From FCE, just export to QuickTime Movie (do not use QT Conversion). If you'll burn the DVD on the same computer, make sure the "self-contained" box is unchecked for a much quicker export.

Maybe you are looking for

  • Trouble With Grub - Setting up Triple Boot

    Before I had Arch running on my desktop, I was using Ubuntu with Vista on the same disk and XP on another one. When I moved to Arch, I backed up menu.lst to preserve the entries, and installed Arch over the same partition that Ubuntu was on. However,

  • Can you specify a Collection as a inputHidden value?

    I am trying to set an inputHidden field to a List in a JSF Facelets page. However the list is always set to null in the backing bean after the page is submitted. Code:      <h:inputHidden value="#{controllerObj['ttyList']}" />      <h:inputHidden val

  • Uploading a FCP project to iPod

    I'm wanting to put a small FCP project onto my 30G. iPod. Can this be done? If so, how?

  • Songs doesn't appear in playlist

    It looks like I'm the only one who have this bug.  Sometimes when I add a song to the walkman playlist, the song doesn't appear in the list actually. It's annoying and stupid.  I don't think I'm misusing the phone. The only reason I expected Kitkat u

  • Query that EXCLUDES keywords?

    Is it possible to create a smart album query that EXCLUDES certain keywords? Example: I want the album to include all pictures with keywords "red", "yellow", "blue", but not include those that have keywords "red", "yellow", "blue" and "green". If it