Handling mail only for a particular host

Hi all, I have Messaging Server 5.2 on an internal machine that gets it's external mail from an outfacing mailhub. The machine is 'messaging.domain.uk' but somewhere the rules in imta.cnf try to handle mail for '*.domain.uk'. When I try to send an internal mail to '[email protected]' which should go straight to the mailhub and get re-addressed to '[email protected]' the local Messaging Server is trying to handle the mail and complains with 'illegal or unknown alias 5.1.1' because the user/mailbox doesn't exist locally.
Any help on this would be gratefully appreciated.
Martin Pegler

Hi,
try something like this.....
! Rules to select local users
! Uncomment the next line for Direct LDAP mode
! $* $E$F$U%$[email protected]$V$H
!messaging.domain.uk $U%$[email protected]
domain.uk $U%$[email protected]
.domain.uk $U%domain.uk
Roberto

Similar Messages

  • PO from PR only for a particular document type

    Dear Gurus
    I want purchase orders should be raised with reference to purchase requisitions only. System should allow to make purchase orders with reference to purchase requisitions only for a particular document type only.
    I have configured in OMET and assigend this in SU3, now the system is not allowing to create PO for all document types, but I want to restrict this for a particular document type only
    Is there any configu change required?
    Regards
    Muthukumar

    Hi
    You can make it in MM - purchasing -> purchase orders -> define document types -> check the document type -> click on link purchase requisitions.
    And in define screen layout at document level - make PR mandatory for your purchase order document type (field reference).
    Thanks
    Edited by: Praveen Raghavendra on Jan 12, 2009 2:07 PM

  • How to configure Reconciliation only for a particular resource

    Hi All,
    I have a requirement to configure target reconciliation from AD only for a client. For that i have installed the conector as per documentation (both prov and recon). Now how can i make sure that:-
    1. When i disable/enable the user in OIM, corresponding target resource will not be disabled/enabled.
    2. If i make any changes on resource form corresponding change should not flow back to AD.
    Does removing the prov related jar able to ensure these things or i need to remove the corresponding prov lookup or any changes required in configuration lookup? Please suggest...TIA

    Change the drop down option to "Disable Process..."
    Attach tcComplete event handler there.
    In Task to Object Status Mapping, select Disabled in front of completed.
    Now suppose user is PROVISIONED to a resource say Test. So whenever user gets DISABLED in OIM, it will disabled the target resource Test. But in actual the target resource will not be disabled for that user. He/She can access that resource after getting disabled as you haven't put the logic to disable the target resource (as you have used tcComplete here).
    As you are saying that it should show disabled only if Disabled is coming from Trusted Resource. Then it's fine till now.
    If you don't want to show status as Disabled then in Task to Object Status Mapping, do not select Disabled in front of completed. In this case, it will show status as PROVISIONED only. This is wrong.
    I'll try to understand what you have written here ->
    BUT NOW THE ISSUE. IT DISABLED MY ASSOCIATED RESOURCE (not in target resource actually but on oim side under resources tab). THIS IS ACTUALLY NOT DESIRABLE.
    - > It will do as you are using tcComplete. If you put your java code which disables the target resource in integration tab (in form of process task adapter instead of tcComplete) then it will disables the actual target resource for user.
    REAL REQUIREMENT IS THAT FOR NOW (*till provisioning is not configured*) OIM DISABLE SHOULD NOT INVOKE THE DISABLE OF ASSOCIATED TARGET RESOURCE NOR IT CHANGED THE STATUS UNDER RESOURCES TAB FOR PARTICULAR RESOURCE. THE STATUS UNDER RESOURCES TAB SHOULD ONLY BE CHANGED WHILE RECONCILIATION.
    -> As you have written, "Till provisioning is not configured", So if provisioning is not configured then it will not show disabled under Resource tab for that particular resource.
    You can see disabled only after resource is provisioned to that user.
    If this doesn't answer your question, it would be better if you explain your requirement clearly. It's not clear.

  • Can't use ssh publickey, but only for a single host

    I've been using publickeys for a long time to connect my laptop to my server, but lately I can't connect when I'm in this place only.
    It is the same key and it works perfectly, except when I'm in this specific network. And it doesn't seem to be a firewall issue, because the remote server actually logs the attempt.
    I'm all out of ideas. Nothing I try has any effect.
    ssh -vvv
    OpenSSH_6.1p1, OpenSSL 1.0.1e 11 Feb 2013
    debug1: Reading configuration data /home/<user>/.ssh/config
    debug1: /home/<user>/.ssh/config line 14: Applying options for <host>
    debug1: Reading configuration data /etc/ssh/ssh_config
    debug2: ssh_connect: needpriv 0
    debug1: Connecting to <host> port 443.
    debug1: Connection established.
    debug3: Incorrect RSA1 identifier
    debug3: Could not load "/home/<user/.ssh/id_rsa" as a RSA1 public key
    debug1: identity file /home/<user>/.ssh/id_rsa type 1
    debug1: identity file /home/<user>/.ssh/id_rsa-cert type -1
    debug1: identity file /home/<user>/.ssh/id_dsa type -1
    debug1: identity file /home/<user>/.ssh/id_dsa-cert type -1
    debug1: identity file /home/<user>/.ssh/id_ecdsa type -1
    debug1: identity file /home/<user>/.ssh/id_ecdsa-cert type -1
    debug1: Remote protocol version 2.0, remote software version OpenSSH_6.1
    debug1: match: OpenSSH_6.1 pat OpenSSH*
    debug1: Enabling compatibility mode for protocol 2.0
    debug1: Local version string SSH-2.0-OpenSSH_6.1
    debug2: fd 3 setting O_NONBLOCK
    debug3: put_host_port: <host>:443
    debug3: load_hostkeys: loading entries for host "<host>:443" from file "/home/<user>/.ssh/known_hosts"
    debug3: load_hostkeys: found key type RSA in file /home/<user>/.ssh/known_hosts:1
    debug3: load_hostkeys: loaded 1 keys
    debug3: order_hostkeyalgs: prefer hostkeyalgs: [email protected],[email protected],ssh-rsa
    debug1: SSH2_MSG_KEXINIT sent
    debug1: SSH2_MSG_KEXINIT received
    debug2: kex_parse_kexinit: ecdh-sha2-nistp256,ecdh-sha2-nistp384,ecdh-sha2-nistp521,diffie-hellman-group-exchange-sha256,diffie-hellman-group-exchange-sha1,diffie-hellman-group14-sha1,diffie-hellman-group1-sha1
    debug2: kex_parse_kexinit: [email protected],[email protected],ssh-rsa,[email protected],[email protected],[email protected],[email protected],[email protected],ecdsa-sha2-nistp256,ecdsa-sha2-nistp384,ecdsa-sha2-nistp521,ssh-dss
    debug2: kex_parse_kexinit: aes128-ctr,aes192-ctr,aes256-ctr,arcfour256,arcfour128,aes128-cbc,3des-cbc,blowfish-cbc,cast128-cbc,aes192-cbc,aes256-cbc,arcfour,[email protected]
    debug2: kex_parse_kexinit: aes128-ctr,aes192-ctr,aes256-ctr,arcfour256,arcfour128,aes128-cbc,3des-cbc,blowfish-cbc,cast128-cbc,aes192-cbc,aes256-cbc,arcfour,[email protected]
    debug2: kex_parse_kexinit: hmac-md5,hmac-sha1,[email protected],hmac-sha2-256,hmac-sha2-512,hmac-ripemd160,[email protected],hmac-sha1-96,hmac-md5-96
    debug2: kex_parse_kexinit: hmac-md5,hmac-sha1,[email protected],hmac-sha2-256,hmac-sha2-512,hmac-ripemd160,[email protected],hmac-sha1-96,hmac-md5-96
    debug2: kex_parse_kexinit: [email protected],zlib,none
    debug2: kex_parse_kexinit: [email protected],zlib,none
    debug2: kex_parse_kexinit:
    debug2: kex_parse_kexinit:
    debug2: kex_parse_kexinit: first_kex_follows 0
    debug2: kex_parse_kexinit: reserved 0
    debug2: kex_parse_kexinit: ecdh-sha2-nistp256,ecdh-sha2-nistp384,ecdh-sha2-nistp521,diffie-hellman-group-exchange-sha256,diffie-hellman-group-exchange-sha1,diffie-hellman-group14-sha1,diffie-hellman-group1-sha1
    debug2: kex_parse_kexinit: ssh-rsa,ssh-dss,ecdsa-sha2-nistp256
    debug2: kex_parse_kexinit: aes128-ctr,aes192-ctr,aes256-ctr,arcfour256,arcfour128,aes128-cbc,3des-cbc,blowfish-cbc,cast128-cbc,aes192-cbc,aes256-cbc,arcfour,[email protected]
    debug2: kex_parse_kexinit: aes128-ctr,aes192-ctr,aes256-ctr,arcfour256,arcfour128,aes128-cbc,3des-cbc,blowfish-cbc,cast128-cbc,aes192-cbc,aes256-cbc,arcfour,[email protected]
    debug2: kex_parse_kexinit: hmac-md5,hmac-sha1,[email protected],hmac-sha2-256,hmac-sha2-512,hmac-ripemd160,[email protected],hmac-sha1-96,hmac-md5-96
    debug2: kex_parse_kexinit: hmac-md5,hmac-sha1,[email protected],hmac-sha2-256,hmac-sha2-512,hmac-ripemd160,[email protected],hmac-sha1-96,hmac-md5-96
    debug2: kex_parse_kexinit: none,[email protected]
    debug2: kex_parse_kexinit: none,[email protected]
    debug2: kex_parse_kexinit:
    debug2: kex_parse_kexinit:
    debug2: kex_parse_kexinit: first_kex_follows 0
    debug2: kex_parse_kexinit: reserved 0
    debug2: mac_setup: found hmac-md5
    debug1: kex: server->client aes128-ctr hmac-md5 [email protected]
    debug2: mac_setup: found hmac-md5
    debug1: kex: client->server aes128-ctr hmac-md5 [email protected]
    debug1: sending SSH2_MSG_KEX_ECDH_INIT
    debug1: expecting SSH2_MSG_KEX_ECDH_REPLY
    debug1: Server host key: <host key>
    debug3: put_host_port: <host>:443
    debug3: put_host_port: <host>:443
    debug3: load_hostkeys: loading entries for host "<host>:443" from file "/home/<user>/.ssh/known_hosts"
    debug3: load_hostkeys: found key type RSA in file /home/<user>/.ssh/known_hosts:1
    debug3: load_hostkeys: loaded 1 keys
    debug3: load_hostkeys: loading entries for host "<host>:443" from file "/home/<user>/.ssh/known_hosts"
    debug3: load_hostkeys: found key type RSA in file /home/<user>/.ssh/known_hosts:11
    debug3: load_hostkeys: loaded 1 keys
    debug1: Host '<host>:443' is known and matches the RSA host key.
    debug1: Found key in /home/<user>/.ssh/known_hosts:1
    debug1: ssh_rsa_verify: signature correct
    debug2: kex_derive_keys
    debug2: set_newkeys: mode 1
    debug1: SSH2_MSG_NEWKEYS sent
    debug1: expecting SSH2_MSG_NEWKEYS
    debug2: set_newkeys: mode 0
    debug1: SSH2_MSG_NEWKEYS received
    debug1: Roaming not allowed by server
    debug1: SSH2_MSG_SERVICE_REQUEST sent
    debug2: service_accept: ssh-userauth
    debug1: SSH2_MSG_SERVICE_ACCEPT received
    debug2: key: /home/<user>/.ssh/id_rsa (0x1d61230)
    debug2: key: /home/<user>/.ssh/id_dsa ((nil))
    debug2: key: /home/<user>/.ssh/id_ecdsa ((nil))
    debug1: Authentications that can continue: publickey
    debug3: start over, passed a different list publickey
    debug3: preferred publickey,keyboard-interactive,password
    debug3: authmethod_lookup publickey
    debug3: remaining preferred: keyboard-interactive,password
    debug3: authmethod_is_enabled publickey
    debug1: Next authentication method: publickey
    debug1: Offering RSA public key: /home/<user>/.ssh/id_rsa
    debug3: send_pubkey_test
    debug2: we sent a publickey packet, wait for reply
    and this is the log from journalctl
    Mar 27 09:38:29 xen sudo[29258]: pam_unix(sudo:session): session closed for user root
    Mar 27 09:38:32 xen sshd[29196]: debug1: Forked child 590.
    Mar 27 09:38:32 xen sshd[590]: Set /proc/self/oom_score_adj to 0
    Mar 27 09:38:32 xen sshd[590]: debug1: rexec start in 5 out 5 newsock 5 pipe 7 sock 8
    Mar 27 09:38:32 xen sshd[590]: debug1: inetd sockets after dupping: 3, 3
    Mar 27 09:38:32 xen sshd[590]: Connection from <host> port 54330
    Mar 27 09:38:32 xen sshd[590]: debug1: Client protocol version 2.0; client software version OpenSSH_6.1
    Mar 27 09:38:32 xen sshd[590]: debug1: match: OpenSSH_6.1 pat OpenSSH*
    Mar 27 09:38:32 xen sshd[590]: debug1: Enabling compatibility mode for protocol 2.0
    Mar 27 09:38:32 xen sshd[590]: debug1: Local version string SSH-2.0-OpenSSH_6.1
    Mar 27 09:38:32 xen sshd[590]: debug1: permanently_set_uid: 99/99 [preauth]
    Mar 27 09:38:32 xen sshd[590]: debug1: list_hostkey_types: ssh-rsa,ssh-dss,ecdsa-sha2-nistp256 [preauth]
    Mar 27 09:38:32 xen sshd[590]: debug1: SSH2_MSG_KEXINIT sent [preauth]
    Mar 27 09:38:32 xen sshd[590]: debug1: SSH2_MSG_KEXINIT received [preauth]
    Mar 27 09:38:32 xen sshd[590]: debug1: kex: client->server aes128-ctr hmac-md5 [email protected] [preauth]
    Mar 27 09:38:32 xen sshd[590]: debug1: kex: server->client aes128-ctr hmac-md5 [email protected] [preauth]
    Mar 27 09:38:32 xen sshd[590]: debug1: expecting SSH2_MSG_KEX_ECDH_INIT [preauth]
    Mar 27 09:38:32 xen sshd[590]: debug1: SSH2_MSG_NEWKEYS sent [preauth]
    Mar 27 09:38:32 xen sshd[590]: debug1: expecting SSH2_MSG_NEWKEYS [preauth]
    Mar 27 09:38:32 xen sshd[590]: debug1: SSH2_MSG_NEWKEYS received [preauth]
    Mar 27 09:38:32 xen sshd[590]: debug1: KEX done [preauth]
    Mar 27 09:38:32 xen sshd[590]: debug1: userauth-request for user <user> service ssh-connection method none [preauth]
    Mar 27 09:38:32 xen sshd[590]: debug1: attempt 0 failures 0 [preauth]
    Mar 27 09:38:32 xen sshd[590]: debug1: PAM: initializing for "<user>"
    Mar 27 09:38:32 xen sshd[590]: debug1: PAM: setting PAM_RHOST to "<host>"
    Mar 27 09:38:32 xen sshd[590]: debug1: PAM: setting PAM_TTY to "ssh"
    Mar 27 09:38:32 xen sshd[590]: debug1: userauth-request for user <user> service ssh-connection method publickey [prea
    Mar 27 09:38:32 xen sshd[590]: debug1: attempt 1 failures 0 [preauth]
    Mar 27 09:38:32 xen sshd[590]: debug1: test whether pkalg/pkblob are acceptable [preauth]
    Mar 27 09:38:32 xen sshd[590]: debug1: temporarily_use_uid: 1000/100 (e=0/0)
    Mar 27 09:38:32 xen sshd[590]: debug1: trying public key file /home/<user>/.ssh/authorized_keys
    Mar 27 09:38:32 xen sshd[590]: debug1: fd 4 clearing O_NONBLOCK
    Mar 27 09:38:32 xen sshd[590]: debug1: matching key found: file /home/<user>/.ssh/authorized_keys, line 1
    Mar 27 09:38:32 xen sshd[590]: Found matching RSA key: <key>
    Mar 27 09:38:32 xen sshd[590]: debug1: restore_uid: 0/0
    Mar 27 09:38:32 xen sshd[590]: Postponed publickey for <user> from <host> port 54330 ssh2 [preauth]
    And it just hangs there forever.
    If I try to use the same key to log in to other servers (one debian and an openWRT router) it works just fine from this location. This key also works to log in to the archlinux server if I'm on other networks, such as my college's or my other workplace.
    Any help is very appreciated. As it stands, I have to log in to my debian server and from there I have to log in to my archlinux server. I wish I could just log in directly as I've done many times in the past.

    Hi,
    I don't know whether you've solved the issue in the meantime (your issue was three months ago), but I thought I'd post this reply just to let other people who run into this problem know what happened to me and how I solved it.
    I had exactly the same problem as you had. The logging in stopped at exactly the same point in the debugging trace. I too was experiencing the problem from a single network (multiple hosts on the network could not log onto a remote server). Logging into the remote server from other locations (even with the same laptop) worked fine.
    The problem turned out to be an MTU problem in my case. I was running an OpenVPN connection to the remote server, and I was logging into it over the VPN. No problems, usually, except for the fact that the network that I was logging in from is a glass fiber network using PPPoE. The MTU on that link is 1460 bytes, not the 1500 bytes that is more common. I had to reconfigure the OpenVPN interfaces (using the OpenVPN configuration options "mssfix 1360", "fragment 1360" and "tun-mtu 1400" on both sides of the connection) to use a smaller MTU on the OpenVPN tunX interface, and everything started working normally again.
    Obviously, the MTU was wrong for every connection going over the VPN, but the OpenVPN tunnel was somewhat resistant to this mistake because I turned on LZO compression, which made most packets that were transmitted over the OpenVPN interface (tunX) that were using an MTU of 1500 bytes smaller than the maximum allowed on the actual link. Anyway, the lesson is: set up your MTUs on your links correctly. And turn on "mssfix" so that if you're routing remote hosts' traffic over the OpenVPN tunnel, their TCP stacks will be made aware of the actual MTU of the link.
    Hope this helps somebody,
    Sven

  • Mutliple accounts: download new mails only for certain accounts

    i have setup mail to have a few accounts. i can disable accounts in the preferences, but then they are not any longer shown in mail.
    when i now open mail, all new mails from all accounts are retrieved. how can i have mail only download new mail for one (certain) account. maybe to trigger the download by hand? or have mail configured to download mails automatically for one account and manually for the others.
    it is very anoying, when opening mail, that all accounts are processed. this takes time especially on a weak and slow internet connection, it also costs download traffic. i want to manually trigger the "get new mails" for accounts.
    markus

    thats not the point: i don't want the automatic push in the backround. setting "manual" only means: that the mails are retrieved when mail.app is openend. this is not what i want. i want to open mail.app and then choose which mails/accounts being retrieved!

  • Creation of PO only for one particular storage location

    Hi Friends
    One of my material is extended to four storage location within a plant say S001 S002 S003 and S004 but here requirment is at the time of raising PO for this material,system should always propose only one particular storage location say S001. Is this possible
    Need your guidance
    Regards
    VS

    Hi supergene
    system will never propose particular  storage location based on material.
    May be u can add particular storage location in <b>personal setting</b> so that for all PO it will be picked as default storage location.
    system will propose storage location at the time of GR based on storage location maintained in Material master
    Or
    you can use the authorisation object M_MSEG_LGO. To restrict users from using storage location other than which they have authorised for
    Vishal...

  • Load remote content in mail only for approved addresses

    Is there a way to configure mail to automatically load content of only approved addresses? I don't want to always load remote content but, there are some addresses that I would like to load the remote content automatically. I only seem to be able to load it for everyone or no one.
    Thanks a lot
    P

    Well, maybe someone else can get this working better, but I have a rule set that will Load Remote Content when you click on Apply Rules and are seeing the email in the Preview window.  Of course that kind of defeats the purpose a bit, but I used the program Mouse Position Menu to click on an area of the screen where the button is located.  Here is the script info.
    set x to 1830
    set y to 118
    set l to 1
    do shell script "
    /usr/bin/python <<END
    import sys
    import time
    from Quartz.CoreGraphics import *
    def mouseEvent(type, posx, posy):
              theEvent = CGEventCreateMouseEvent(None, type, (posx,posy), kCGMouseButtonLeft)
              CGEventPost(kCGHIDEventTap, theEvent)
    def mousemove(posx,posy):
              mouseEvent(kCGEventMouseMoved, posx,posy);
    def mouseclick(posx,posy):
              mouseEvent(kCGEventLeftMouseDown, posx,posy);
              mouseEvent(kCGEventLeftMouseUp, posx,posy);
    ourEvent = CGEventCreate(None);
    currentpos=CGEventGetLocation(ourEvent);             # Save current mouse position
    for x in range(0, " & l & "):
              mouseclick(" & x & "," & y & ");
    mousemove(int(currentpos.x),int(currentpos.y));      # Restore mouse position
    END"
    My screen is a 21.5" running at the native 1920x1080 resolution.  So my coordinates were 1830,118 and I plugged them in to the AppleScript above.
    Here is the link to the original click thread with the credit of who came up with the above scripting info.
    http://discussions.apple.com/thread/3708948

  • Making a transaction read-only for a particular user status

    Hello,
            I have a requirement wherein I need to make an opportunity read-only if it is saved with the user status set to 'Lost'. I tried setting the 'Forbidden' flag for 'Change Document' for this status but the problem is that the transaction gets locked even before saving it.
    I have a 'Reason' field where I have dropdown values for the 'Lost' status. But when I try to select a reason, error message appears as: 'no changes possible in document'.
    Is it possible via configuration to have the transaction locked only after it is saved with user status 'Lost' and not immediately on setting the status?
    Regards,
    Aditya Mishra

    2 ways to achieve it...
    1. the document editing can be controlled based on its status i.e. standard auth objects exist to control so that user is not able to make changes with this status.
    2. implement BADI CRM_ORDER_AUTH_CHECK
        put your logic to check the document status and accordingly reutrn FALSE if you do not want user to open it in edit mode.
    hope this helps.
    rgds

  • Imessage is not working, but only for one particular contact.

    I cannot send/recive imessages from one particular contact, messages are sent as SMS. All other contacts are fine with imessaging, so why just this particular one? Please help??!!

    If you can send imessage to other users execpt for this one particular person.  Then the issue would be with him/her and not your phone.  That person will have to figure out whats going on.

  • How do I set up Mail only for sending? (Don't want to receive messages)

    Maybe answer is somewhere on the board but I can't seem to find it...
    I think in the past, on older version of Mail, I was able to set up a personal account on my work computer so that I could send from the personal account in Mail. Thing is, I don't want to see or store incoming personal messages (too much distraction at the office!).
    Can Mail be set up this way?
    If I uncheck "enable account," then I don't see option to send from that account. But if I check it, it shows me incoming mail from the account.
    Thanks in advance.

    How about Mail -> Preferences -> General: Check for New Messages and select "Manually" from the drop down.
    Now Mail won't look for incoming mail unless you tell it to.
    Regards
    TD

  • When a pdf file is opened in a tab, the automatic scroll function from the pad does not work in the other tabs, but only for the particular PDF tab.

    The scroll function from the pad/mouse does not work for the other tabs when a PDF file is opened.

    Hi NSHS,
    Have you checked to see if your PDF add-on is up to date? You should take a look at the [[Opening PDF files within Firefox]] Knowledge Base article. There is a lot of good information in there. You should try both of the suggested PDF add-ons to see if that fixes the issue.
    Hopefully this helps!

  • Search my e-mail list for a particular phrase

    I'd like to search over my emails that are still on file to find a particular phrase so that I can find what has happened concerning the subject. Is there a convenient way to do this?

    https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/quick-filter-toolbar
    https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/global-search
    http://en.flossmanuals.net/thunderbird/searching-and-filtering-messages/

  • How to downgrade the Virtualization Software Version for a particular host

    Good morning all:
    I'm trying to downgrade the Virtualization Software Version of one 2012 R2 host to match the others. One host is at 6.3.9600.16404. This is the correct running version of the cluster. The incorrect version on one host is 6.3.9600.17120. I would like that
    version downgraded to 6.3.9600.16404.

    You must mean the "virtual machine guest services" in the properties of a VM.
    This is dependent on the release and patch level of the Hyper-V server that the VM was deployed to.  As that is where the Integration Services (vmguest.iso) comes from, it does not come from SCVMM.
    So, if you happened to deploy this VM to a Hyper-V Server at a newer patch level, then that would explain the issue.
    Brian Ehlert
    http://ITProctology.blogspot.com
    Learn. Apply. Repeat.

  • Delivery quantities only in multiples for a particular set of customers

    Hi all,
    I'm having a requirement and want to know is there any way to solve it by configuration:
    I have to deliver the products in multiples of 5.i have activated this in the material master and it functions properly and issues a warning message when i change the quantity while picking in delivery so  i have converted this message into ERROR message but my problem is i have to activate it only for a particular set of customers..is there any way to achieve it ..i have tried it by tick mark   "switching off rounding" in customer master but this error message is still there for these customers also .
    Can I  acitvate the delivery quantities only in multiples of a particular set of customers..?

    Hi all,
    I have gone through your suggestions but it didn't help me a lot..I am able to trigger rounding profile for a particular set of customers but this thing  can be achieved only in sales Order , i am unable to do this at Delivery level, at delivery level system is allowing me to change the quantity irrespective of the rounding profile.
    Can anyone suggest me how to achieve this at delivery level.
    I have gone through Logistics - General>Control for Quantity Optimizing>Assign Control Profiles
    here also , application for triggering of control profile is given only for sales order.
    plz help.

  • SRM 7.0 POWL Removal of TABS   - Only for Particular Roles

    Hi All,
    We are upgrading onto SRM 7.0 and one of the business requirements is to remove tabs "Team Carts" and "Confirmation of Team Carts" from POWL.
    However the requirement is to exclude it only for one particular role. How can we achieve this?
    I know that this we can restrict this through the following config:
    Path: SPRO --> Cross-Application Componetns --> General Application Functions --> Generic SAP Business Suite Functions --> Personal Object Worklist --> Define Query Visibility at User Level or Define Query Visibility at Role Level
    Define Query Visibility at Role Level:
    Application ID: SAPSRMGP_E_CHECKSTATUS
    Role : /SAPSRM/EMPLOYEE
    Query ID: SAPSRM_E_CHECKSTATUS_01
    Category: SC
    However I would not be able to use the above config to exclude the two tabs for only one role. 
    Is there any other way to achieve this?
    Regards,
    Srinu

    Hi Srinivas,
    I think you can do this by config.
    Path: SPRO > SAP supplier Relationship management> SRM server--> POWL and Advanced Search --> Adjust POWL Layout, Search Criteria, and Pushbuttons
    in which you can define,configure your feeder and it's catalog, actions and other criteria , then make this feeder type available to application/role..
    Hope this helps..
    Thanks,
    Lavanya

Maybe you are looking for