HDD for editing - RAID or SSD?

Hi guys.
I have looked extensively at the tweakers page not too long ago and built myself a machine which has been working out great, but as time passed, I am rethinking my HDD decisions.
Basically I have 2x 3tb 7200rpm drives in RAID 0 - but I am wondering if I am better off using a 1tb SSD?
The RAID drive will almost always have half of it empty and the SSD would come very close to being full.
So what works out better? Maybe 2x 512GB ssds in RAID 0?
Please advise, thanks.

My personal new system has an Samsung 840 Pro drive (of course if buying today it would be an 850 Pro) for the OS/Application /Media Cache and a SM951 for the project/media drive.  Then I would archive/backup to the antique hard drive technology.

Similar Messages

  • GT683: swapping RAID0 HD config for non-RAID/AHCI SSD boot drive

    A question re: MSI skus which come with 2x HDs in RAID0 config. My system (GT683DXR-603US sku) came with 2x 500GB HDs (WD5000BEKT) in RAID0 config.
    First thing I did was to replace this with a Crucial M4 256GB ssd, though prior to this I took an image of the stock system (prior to even booting it up the first time) and restored said image onto the SSD.
    The first time I booted off the SSD (no other HD in the unit, as I pulled both of the WD 500GB out to try the SSD alone), I went into the BIOS and changed the SATA config from RAID to AHCI. But Win boot cycle almost immediately resulted in a blue screen. I then changed SATA config from AHCI to IDE, w/the same boot result. Finally, set the BIOS config back to the original RAID, and Win7 booted fine.
    Upon confirming SSD Win7 boot and testing operation successfully, I pulled the SSD, place the 2x 500GB HDs back in the system, just long enough to break the RAID 0 array.
    Replaced the SSD in the primary bay, and left one of the 500GB HDs in the 2nd bay, and that's how I'm using the system now: Crucial M4 SSD boot drive, WD Scorpio 500GB data drive ... with the BIOS SATA config set to RAID mode.
    So the system is working now, but question is - should I pursue trying to change the BIOS setting from RAID to AHCI mode? I'm thinking that in order to get the SATA 6Gbps performance out of the Crucial M4, the Intel SATA config needs to be set to AHCI ... yet apparently I first need to modify the Win7 config (the SATA driver, perhaps?), before I can modify the BIOS sata config?
    Any suggestions would be appreciated!

    bump ... any thoughts? I'm thinking to leave my sysetm in RAID mode, as from what I've read recently Intel storage mgr supports TRIM in RAID mode as well as AHCI.

  • What GPU to get for CS6 + Are SSDs worth it for editing?

    My current computer is an old dell xps 7100
    Phenom x4 830 (Yes I know, I'd love to get an intel 3770k or something but I'm pretty strapped for cash)
    Some tiny amd gpu, not sure which (can use gpu-z if really needed)
    12gb ram
    1 500gb hdd
    The machine is really slow and the hard drive is filled up a lot, so I'm thinking of re-installing windows (possibly windows 8 for the faster boots and all) and clearing all of the junk. My other problem is that premiere and after effects are really slow, since its a pretty weak processor with no MPE acceleration. I have around $300 to spend on some upgrades, but I'm not sure which one to get.
    I was thinking of buying a gtx660, since it has 2gb vram (which is better for more complicated projects I think?) and is really fast and a good value for gaming, which I also do. I could also get a gtx 650 and spend the rest on some HDDs for a raid, or maybe an SSD. Or I could buy a gtx 670 or 660 ti if they're really worth it. I haven't needed to use more than 8gb beforehand in projects, so I don't think i'll need to upgrade to like 32gb or anything crazy like that.
    My main question is how much would the gpu acceleration accelerate everything? Would I just be bottlenecked by my cpu and hard drive? And If I did a raid array (raid 0), or got a SSD how much would that speed stuff up.
    Any help would be greatly appreciated, and sorry if I put this in the wrong forum or something. First post here.
    PS I read that cs6 is actually slower for exporting some stuff? Should I just use cs5 or cs4? I could just render the few things i need in cs6 first and do the rest in cs5 (like motion tracking and such). Or am i just overcomplicating stuff.

    Hi Randal,
    You are absolutely correct.  I was getting the specs off the data sheet I have here and it was for the OEM version of the GTX 560 which has higher specs. I have so many video cards here, I guess I need to sort them out as OEM and non-OEM cards and keep them stored in different rooms.   lol.
    As far as the GT 640, on an AMD system quad core, it did produce faster times than the GT440, even though the GT440  has a wider memory bandwidth.   That one is strange.  HOWEVER, on an Intel quad core, the GT 640 was slower.  Go figure.
    Right now I am running tests with a GTX650 and a GTX 650 Ti.   So far the GTX 650 Ti is better than the GTX650 for rendering.  Even though they are both 128 bit cards, they seem to work well in an AMD system.
    As far as the GTX 560 non Ti holding back your system, I can see that.  I am just finishing up building a new animation rendering system based on the AMD FX-6300 chip, so I am lookng forward to testing the various video cards I have here with it.   It was a budget build system, as I pulled the HD's, DVD drive, keyboard and mouse from an old system.  It is NOT being used as a Premiere editing system, just for rendering animations with ProAnimator, Lightwave and a few other programs.  But, I will use it to test video cards with.
    Dave
    RjL190365 wrote:
    Two small corrections, Dave:
    The non-Ti GTX 560 actually has only 336 CUDA cores, not 384 (that belongs to the GTX 560 Ti). Also, the GF114-derived GeForce GPUs have only a 256-bit memory interface width, not a 320-bit memory interface width. However, the 128.2 GB/s memory bandwidth is correct for a reference GTX 560 (Ti or non-Ti).
    On the other hand, the GTX 650 does have 384 CUDA cores (same number as the GT 640 since both are based on the same GK107 core). But it runs at a slightly higher clock speed, has a 128-bit memory interface width and 80 GB/s memory bandwidth (versus 28.5 GB/s memory bandwidth for the GT 640).
    In any case, the GTX 560 non-Ti is definitely holding back my i5-2400 auxiliary editing rig.

  • Is there a way to run a external ssd with my mid 2011 iMac hdd in a raid configuration and basically have a fusion drive

    is there a way to run a external ssd with my mid 2011 iMac hdd in a raid configuration and basically have a fusion drive

    A Fusion Drive is not a RAID; it's a CoreStorage logical volume group. While it's technically possible to do as you suggest, there would be little or no benefit from it.

  • For Garageband Use only - RevA Macbook Air 1.6 80Gb HDD or 1.8 64Gb SSD?

    Hi,
    I'm about to buy a refurb Rev A Macbook Air for only using Garageband. (Reasons for choosing it over Macbook are portability and screen quality).
    Am I going to notice any difference between the 2 models (1.6 80Gb HDD and 1.8 64Gb SSD) for pure Garageband use?
    - I'm mainly going to be using the software instruments/loops (but might on a rare occasion record in an audio track - never more than one per song though). I don't think I'd ever get to more than 16 tracks, probably maxing at about 8.
    As they are $300 apart.
    Also am I going to be able to run Garageband with an ease comparable to running it a new low-end macbook? As I know the RevA's get hot under the collar with some apps. I tried Garageband on the white macbook today and it was fine - quick, smooth and easy - but obviously there were no RevA Macbook Airs instore to compare.
    Final question - as this will be my first mac and I have only tried garageband on a few occasions - what is the size of an average Song file with no audio running about 8 tracks of midi (so I can figure out how many I can get on the harddrive).
    Many thanks for any opinions/answers/comments - all input is much appreciated.

    Since you haven't mentioned how you attempted formatting the drive:
    Drive Preparation
    1. Boot from your OS X Installer Disc. After the installer loads select your language and click on the Continue button. When the menu bar appears select Disk Utility from the Installer menu (Utilities menu for Tiger, Leopard or Snow Leopard.)
    2. After DU loads select your hard drive (this is the entry with the mfgr.'s ID and size) from the left side list. Note the SMART status of the drive in DU's status area. If it does not say "Verified" then the drive is failing or has failed and will need replacing. SMART info will not be reported on external drives. Otherwise, click on the Partition tab in the DU main window.
    3. Under the Volume Scheme heading set the number of partitions from the drop down menu to one. Set the format type to Mac OS Extended (Journaled.) Click on the Options button, set the partition scheme to GUID (for Intel Macs) or APM (for PPC Macs) then click on the OK button. Click on the Partition button and wait until the process has completed.

  • Changing HDD for SSD QUESTION (U410)

    Is any data held on the 500GB drive at time of reset?
    Basically my question is, can I simply swap the 500gb HDD for a 250gb SSD without problems of so when I reset the Windows8 install etc will work as usual?
    I will use the one click recovery button, and reset everything, except this time on the 250gb SSD.
    HELP?

    hi shoutingdog,
    Welcome to Lenovo Community Forums!
    First Before you change any setting or setup,
        Create a backupdrive first of your WIndows 8 using this Method and let's Name that as your Repair Image.
          Download and install belarc advisor to get the product key.
    The HDD will have everything, your Windows 8 Os and even the Onekey Recovery Partition, so removing your HDD will render the One click recovery button Not working.
    Two ways to install windows 8 back to the blank SSD.
    1 You will need an external mount for your SSD or HDD where the scenario should be both SSD and HDD are connected to the computer so you can clone the HDD to your SSD.
      (If the clone failed then you can use the Repair Image)
    2 You can use a retail copy or any installer copy of Windows 8 and install that to your SSD, if asked for a product key, use the Key extracted using the Belarc advisor.
    Any driver needs you can download from Support.lenovo.com
    Again The Preloaded HDD Contains the Recovery partition, and the One click feature will look for the HDD where it is saved.
    Best Regards
    Solid Cruver
    Did someone help you today? Press the star on the left to thank them with a Kudo!
    If you find a post helpful and it answers your question, please mark it as an "Accepted Solution"! This will help the rest of the Community with similar issues identify the verified solution and benefit from it.
    Follow @LenovoForums on Twitter!

  • Which SSD hdd for t410s?

    Hi Guys
    I want to to install a SSD HDD into my T410s: has any one done this before?
    1) will it make it faster?
    2) which SSD will fit no problem?
    Tom
    Solved!
    Go to Solution.

    yes it will be faster, but you need to look for 1.8 inch SSD, they are pretty rare now and not cheap.
    Look for something like Intel X-18m.
    Also you could remove the optical drive and put in a 2.5 inch SSD into that caddy if you want. This maybe a cheaper, and you won't get any speed penalty, as the main hdd and the optical drive bay uses SATAII connection.
    Regards,
    Jin Li
    May this year, be the year of 'DO'!
    I am a volunteer, and not a paid staff of Lenovo or Microsoft

  • Swapping HDD for SSD

    I'm thinking about buying a 17" MacBook Pro and am having difficulty deciding between a 320GB 7,200 RPM drive or the 128 GB SSD. I don't really know if the 128 GB SSD will make huge amounts of difference for the cost, so I'm wondering if it's possible to buy the 320 GB for now and then upgrade later. Would this be easy to do or would there be different connectors involved?
    Apologies if this has been asked before -- I couldn't find an answer.

    Hi.
    It appears that Apple authorizes memory and hard drive swap on unibody MacBook Pros and the procedure seems very easy (it was not so for previous MacBook Pro, or iBooks).
    You can find it on the MacBook Pro support page.
    Physically, SSDs are the same as standard hard disks. So as long as you choose a 2.5" SATA SSD (with the correct height, but I believe that they all are 9.5mm high, which is the standard for notebook HDDs), you will be OK.
    So go ahead with the standard HDD and upgrade to a SSD when you want.
    At this time, you will be able to copy the content of your old drive to the new one (as long as it fits ...) by placing it in a USB enclosure, using a free program called Carbon Copy Cloner. You will need another drive (or another Mac) as startup disk.
    H
    Hops this helps,
    Jérôme.

  • Specs for editing on MacBook Pro.

    Just got CS6. My old MacBook isn't up to the task of editing HD with it. (I used to use Final Cut Pro 6 with little problem). I'm considering getting a new MacBook.
    Anybody else editing on a MacBook? What do I need to make it run smoothly, and not have to render all the time. (Edting on a desktop isn't an option at the moment).

    Hi,
    If you want a solution that can get the job done, but not an extreme pro level, you could try proxy editing/offline editing.
    (Pasted from another reply I made to another similar topic.)
    I keep checking out these forums from time to time and there has been a rapidly rising trend for people asking more and more about editing on laptops. I myself posted in the past quite a bit since I also needed a laptop. The very fact that they are considering laptops for editing and not going for more powerful AND cheaper desktop alternatives means that they need systems that are not going to be used for very heavy duty editing and for general usage as well, and a laptop is ideal due to comfort using it for general computing.
    I have also personally met and seen people who have configured systems with nVidia non-supported cards WITHOUT the hack and are more than happy not knowing whats going on and that their card has never really been used by premiere without the file modification.
    However, even RED4k footage can be (theoretically) edited EFFECTIVELY on a minimum requirement PC if the experts here start recommending people how to do proxy/offline edits. Even for the extremely non-technical folks, there are youtube links with easy to understand directions on how to do that.
    http://forums.adobe.com/message/4290664?tstart=0
    http://www.homedvd.ca/2010/12/19/offline-hd-proxy-editing-at-work/
    http://helpx.adobe.com/speedgrade/using/proxy-files.html
    I will post links later as do not have access to youtube now, or anyone can simply search for 'proxy edit' or 'offline edit' on youtube.
    People with even terrible systems with 1 hdd and 4 gigs ram can merrily hack away at footage without much worries. Yes, there will be a few additional steps and time required, but they can still pull off something acceptable this way.
    Another thing, there are caddys on ebay for $10 that swap out the optical drives of the laptops with an internal enclosure which allows another harddisk to be added. I am using this myself on a lenovo W520 and have 2 7200 RPM harddrives. I can even add in a 3rd MSATA SSD drive as this laptop allows that (you can even order one from lenovo with RAID already installed and 2 drives).
    http://www.ebay.com/sch/i.html?_trksid=p5197.m570.l1313&_nkw=w520+cadd y&_sacat=0&_from=R40
    Therefore, yes, I do believe that it is possible to edit just about anything (save very high bitrate footage that needs to be done quickly) on just about anything (if the transcoding time and disk space are available).
    I once again wish to clarify that the above is geared towards non-professionaly like myself (or even for professionals having a really bad day) but this technique can become even more effective if intel's Quicksync transcoding engine is used, which is the fastest at video transcoding at this time. (have not checked this out myself yet)
    I hope this was helpful. I would be more than happy for any criticism and advice from the experts here because I learnt a lot through them and hope to learn more.
    Cheers.

  • Another strange RAID 0 SSD query with Asus P9X79 Pro - RAID array appearing in AHCI mode

    Hi all, I found this thread:
    http://forums.adobe.com/message/4874435
    very helpful, as it describes a similar situation to my case (same motherboard).  Here is my situation:
    historically, this was my setup (all on Asus P9X79 Pro motherboard):
    2 x 120Gb Intel 320 SSDs.  Operating system on one of them, Lightroom catalogue and photoshop scratch disk on the other.
    1 x 2TB WD SATA 3 HDD.  All images and other data etc
    1 x blu-ray DVD burner
    As I am now needing video editing, I have just bought Premiere Pro.  My OS SSD was also getting quite full.  So, I took the plunge and bought a Samsung 830series 256GB SSD.
    My plan was this:
    (a) make the Samsung the new OS drive, so lots of spare space for the SSD to play with (plugged into one of the 6 GB/s ports)
    (b) make a RAID 0 of the two Intel SSDs (i.e. 240GB volume) to act as Lightroom catalogue, PS scratch disk and Premiere Pro media cache, previews etc etc. This would be on 2 of the 3GB/s ports
    (c) keep the 2TB WD HDD for data. (plugged into the other 6 GB/s port)
    (d) plug the Blu-Ray drive into another of the 3 GB/s ports
    However, I was having a nightmare reinstalling the OS from scratch, so I ended up using Norton Ghost to port the OS across from the Intel SSD to the Samsung SSD.  I didn't have a lot of faith that it would work, but it did.... eventually.  I have checked SSD alignment and it is correct, and I benchmarked the Samsung and it is flying - it is running to reported values according to AS Benchmark.  So, I think that one is working fine - great stuff.
    However, this left me with the two Intel 120GB SSDs to try to make into a RAID 0.  Apart from the fact that my OS was already installed (and so no F6 driver install), I followed the instructions/suggestions of frogo369 in the forum thread I linked to above.  I changed the SATA mode to RAID in the UEFI and then defined the RAID in the CTRL+I  Intel RST option ROM utility.  I then rebooted the PC.... oh dear.....
    The PC started and got as far as the swirling Welcome to Windows sign (i.e. before log on appears), but then came the Blue Screen Of Death - and it gets into a never-ending reboot cycle.  :-(
    So, I figured that this was because I had changed my SATA mode in the UEFI from AHCI to RAID, but the OS was obviously from a time when I was only on AHCI.  Therefore, I changed the SATA mode back to AHCI in UEFI.  thankfully, the computer now boots successfully once more into Windows.
    BUT, HERE'S THE BIT I DON'T UNDERSTAND..........
    Weirdly (for me at least!), when I look at the list of disks in Disk Management, I could see the RAID.  It was "unallocated", so I formatted it.  It formatted fine.  I then opened the Intel SSD toolbox, and it can see the RAID 0 (it even defines it as such).  The only thing it won't let me do is really "interact" with it as it says I need Intel RST drivers of 11.0 or newer.  But I don't think they are available for the X79 chipset - so no TRIM I think??  I've just benchmarked the RAID and it is doing good numbers - >500Mb/s read and 400Mb/s write if I remember correctly.
    But anyway, my question really is two-fold:
    (a)Firstly - how can I see this RAID/how is it working, if my BIOS is set to AHCI mode not RAID??
    (b)am I likely to see a rapid detioration in the speed of the RAID, given that presumably TRIM won't be working on it?
    Sorry for such a long explanation - and no doubt I've missed out huge bits of info you need anyway!  But, any help, advice or direction would be very, very, gratefully received!
    Tim

    OK, an update to my post - I have now found Intel RST drivers for the X79 chipset - they are here, for the benefit of anyone in the future coming across this page:
    http://downloadcenter.intel.com/Detail_Desc.aspx?agr=Y&DwnldID=21852&keyword=%22Intel+Rapi d+Storage+Technology%22&lang=eng
    These have enabled me communicate with the RAID 0 array via the Intel SSD Toolbox.  I have also confirmed that TRIM is activated on it. 
    However, this still hasn't answered my original question - i.e. how can I be using these two SSDs in RAID mode if RAID is not enabled in the UEFI?  Don't get me wrong - I'm delighted(!!) - but any expertise as to how this is happening would be much appreciated!
    Tim

  • What to put on what HDD for best performances

    Hi,
    A New HDD just fallen on my lap recently, I'm new into Premiere and I wished to use it for my video edition.
    Here my current Spec:
    CPU  I7-2600K @ 4.6Ghz
    RAM: 2 * [ RipjawsX ] F3-17600CL7D-4GBXHD (8 Gig total)
    Motherboard: GA-P67A-UD5-B3
    Hard Drive: 2 * Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB in Raid 0
    Graphics Gigabyte GeForce GTX 570 Fermi Windforce
    The new HDD: is a ST 7200.14 500 gig.
    Right now, because I have no choice, all is on the RAID 0 array.
    I want to know for what / what to put on the new 500 gig HDD I've got.
    Best regards,

    TY Safeharbo11, you've answered my question correctly.
    For now I don't plan to mess around Windows and RAID configuration, I don't need a huge performance boost.  When I'll do I'll probably go the SSD Route for Windows.
    For the RAM, I have the cream of the crop as RAM speed / latency goes, and I don't use more then 50-55% of it in my projects.  So I won't touch it for now (they cost me 125-130$ / 4 gig kit; I have 2 of thooses).
    I doubt the Image would do since I'm Running a On Board RAID Array (not a dedicated card for it).  I will still look into it.
    Bottom line I'll move the Video source files on the new hdd for now (to have at least Windows & Premiere on a different drive then the Video files).
    I'll keep looking for a other 500 Gig that I could use to create a other Raid 0 array.
    Thanks you all.

  • Is After Effects CC disk cache taking up double the space on my RAID 0 SSD? Should I move it?

    In AE CC the available space on my RAID 0 (2 x 120GB SSD) drive drops from 100GB to around 40GB as soon as I do even a small RAM preview and even though I have set the disk cache in the preferences to 30GB. It also causes AE to prompt that I may not have enough space on the drive for the amount of cache I have set in preferences even though there appears to be 40GB left on it.
    I really value working with long fast RAM previews but other than that I'm not sure if the performance is jeopardised at all here. At one point I was enjoying 60GB of disk cache.
    RAID 0 is striped so it shouldn't take up double the space, am I right?
    I am about to install a RAID 0 HDD (2 x 3TB) for source files as I work with video a lot and have a 4K RAW project on the go so no time like the present. So should I move the disk cache from the ridiculously fast RAID 0 SSD to the new RAID HDD drive (as suggested in Harm's guide)?

    Thank you Mylenium. All this time I have been absolutely convinced that you don't need to defragment SSDs. Is this a complete misunderstanding? Even if you do though, I have Windows 8 (not 8.1) which is doing that once a week automatically (apparently even to SSDs).
    Are you saying that the 30GB disk cache set up works like a contiguous file?
    i7 3930k (12 virtual cores) on P9X79 Deluxe
    2 x 120GB Force GT Raid 0 SSD on SATA 6gb/s is my boot drive as well as where I keep programs and the disk cache. I do a disk clean up to remove temp files a couple of times a week but that's all.
    1 x 3TB Barracuda on on SATA 6gb/s for back ups and exports
    3TB Lacie on USB 3 for source video and project files
    2TB Lacie on USB 3 for archive projects
    660ti 2GB
    I'll try a manual defrag of my RAID 0 SSDs now.

  • Which macbook for editing?

    I'm wondering if the macbook air, macbook pro, or macbook pro with retina display will be better for video, and photo editing.
    I have a gaming computer and I just wanted a separate laptop for my photography and video editing. It will also be helpful for when I travel.
    What it'll be used for:
    Adobe photoshop
    Adobe after effects
    Daily (Emails, notes, homework)
    Would I need i5 or i7? Because I heard i7 is better for editing. Do I need to go from 4gb to 8gb ram? And the same from how much space I should upgrade to?
    Macbook air has a long battery life and the new intel HD 5000 graphics.
    Macbook pro with retina display has the nice retina display which may be great for editing, but is it truly even worth it?
    I'm currently in school for software engineering, and photography.
    Which should I get, and what are the necessary upgrades I will need?

    Unless you're too delicate and can't handle the weight, a regular MacBookPro with the Widescreen/Anti-glare and 2.6GHz processor options (gets you 1GB VRAM as well):
    Then upgrade by yourself to 16GB RAM and either a 7200RPM HDD or an SSD for substantially less than what Apple charges and you will have a screamer.

  • How efficient is CS5.5 on a 7200 RPM HDD to edit HD footage?

    I presently have two Seagate Cheetah HD -146.8 GB internal 3.5" SAS 15Krpm 16MB in RAID 0. This is the recommended configuration from Adobe to manage uncompressed HD footage.
    If I install the Production Premium on a 7200 RPM HD, would it be the same efficiency as the RAID 0 configuration to edit HD footage?
    I also have an Intel Core i7 Extreme Edition/ 3.2 GHz processor, a ASUS P6T DELUXE /OC PALM MOTHERBOARD 1 390.00 390.00 AB Motherboard - ATX - iX58 - LGA1366 Socket - Serial ATA-300, and a Quadro CX Graphics Card NVIDIA PCIE 1.5GB with 24 GB of RAM. I also have a 1 TB 7200 RPM HDD for storage.

    To Mylenium. You're right, it's not about the footage. The Raid 0 configuration at 15000 rpm is for the Adobe Premium CS5.5 64 bit. When you open Premiere, After Effects or Photoshop, it's incredibly fast because of the Mercury Engine. And you can playback HD footage in real-time without rendering. That's what Adobe and most experts recommend. But I was wondering how the Premium CS5.5 performs when installed on a regular 7200 rpm HD.

  • Any Thoughts on New iMac Fusion Drive for Editing Video

    I was wondering if there were any thoughts about the new iMac for editing 720/1080 HD video from say an iPhone 5 or Canon Power Shot camera. The drive speed is now only 5400 RPM in the 21.5" model. I was curious if the the combo SSD/5400 RPM HDD had the same editing power as as a 7200 RPM drive.

    Thanks, I've read it, well I should say I've tried to read it. Somewhat over my head, but not totally. I'm just curious if some of the video editing tasks would be done on the HDD or faster SSD drive. I'll have to go back to the article and see if there is any mention of that type of task.
    I'm a little disappointed that you need to move up to the 27" iMac to get a 7200 RPM Fusion Drive. Do not need a 27" desktop.

Maybe you are looking for