HDV to DVD interlace field order - depends on export path!

Summary: Export... -> Using Compressor versus compressing an Export... -> QuickTime Movie file, produces different field orders in the resulting MPEG.
In Detail: Here is my HDV to DVD (MPEG2) process;
Create a DV sequence, and drop the HDV into it, it gets resized, and has a filter to shift the fields by +1 added to it, and is scaled to the correct size for 4:3 (letterboxed) or 16:9 (fills 720x480) - which is fine.
Set the Quicktime Video Compressor for the sequence to 'None', and set the Video Processing -> Motion Filtering Quality to 'Fastest (linear)' as I don't like what Normal or Best does to the image (makes it pixally, check in the canvas).
Now, if you Export -> Using Compressor, and setup a 2-pass mpeg 2 encode, you get a very good image, no via - DV artifacts. I also add the channel blur, set to 1 on all channels, if its too sharp - channel blur does not blur between fields, like flicker filter does, so the motion is not compromised, and looks excellent, but it stops sharp still images from flickering.
However, this is really slow, FCP is tied up, and for a 2 pass encode, any blur or colour filters get applied twice, its also harder to hand this off to a second machine to get on with.
So, logically, you would instead, Export... -> QuickTime Movie... -> Current Setting, Make Self Contained and then load that into Compressor, apply the SAME settings you did Using Compressor... At which point, the FUN begins.
I have finally narrowed down, that this changes the field order, although I nearly went mad discovering it - every time I thought my little 10 second test worked, (exported from the timeline) I would save the whole thing out and compress it, only to find, the interlace order changed, and now needed the field shift removed! And, because my little test worked, I would then do the whole thing, some 20+ hours later, only to find it was wrong!
Export... -> Using QuickTime Conversion... is the same as QuickTime Movie...
Anyone else with experience of this ? It was maddening! But I think I am over the worst of it now! Is there any solution for unifying this for all export methods ?
When it works DVD's encoded from HDV look amazing.
When it works.....
FCP 5.0.4
Compressor 2.0.1
PowerBook G4   Mac OS X (10.4.4)  

Hi Ben,
Ignore the Apple-0 (zero) part - that's just the key shortcut for the sequence settings. (press the Apple Key, and a Zero key with a sequence selected)
So, from the top: (although I'm not in front of my machine right now, so this is from memory)
Create a new DV sequence, 4:3 or 16:9.
Drop the edited HDV sequence into the DV sequence.
De-select the HDV sequence in the DV time line, bring up the Sequence Settings Dialogue for the DV sequence. (make SURE it isn't the sequence setting dialogue for the HDV sequence)
In the sequence setting dialogue, change the codec from DV to None (note - not the same as Uncompressed). If it's currently HDV, you have the wrong sequence, leave it as HDV, close the dialogue, and bring up the setting for the DV sequence.
On the 'Video Processing' tab, for the DV sequence, set the 'Motion Filtering Quality' to 'Fastest (linear)'
Choose OK to close the settings dialogue.
If you want to, and it depends on your footage, add the following blur filter to the HDV sequence in the DV timeline:
Select the HDV sequence in the DV timeline, right click (or hold ctrl key, and click) on the HDV sequence in the DV timeline, and choose the top item in the pop-up menu, 'Open' (in viewer). Click the filters tab of the viewer, you will see the Shift Fields filter, set to +1, added by FCP, add the channel blur, above the shift fields filter. Set the blur to 1 on each channel. I prefer this to the Video -> Flicker Filter, as channel blur does not blur between fields, so it does not blur motion.
I discovered this by accident
Now Save, the following sometimes crashes FCP. Check it in the Canvas viewer, set to 100%, with the channel blur, around text and sharp contrast areas, you get a nice soft blur, turn off that filter if you think its too much.
On to the encoding:
The simplest step, is to choose the DV timeline, and export via compressor. Pick a 2 pass MPEG preset, that matches the 4:3 or 16:9 of the sequence, and submit. This takes a while, on slower machines.
The alternative, which can reduce the time, is to export the DV sequence as an uncompressed QuickTime file - this does not change the quality at all - but can speed things up, because FCP is quite slow at delivering frames to Compressor, compared to Compresser just reading the frame from an uncompressed file, Compresser has to read them twice for 2 pass MPEG encoding. However, you need a lot of fast disk space to store the uncompressed footage.
Hope this helps.
Keep the replies / mail on these boards, that way they stay useful to all!
It was great weekend in Vancouver, wasn't it ?
Hit the beach on Sunday, good times

Similar Messages

  • HDV to DVD-Change Field Dominance Or Not?

    A search I did recently pointed to this article:
    [http://www.larryjordan.biz/articles/bkhdvconvert.html]
    The author claims that when exporting an HDV sequence from FCP to Compressor, he changed the default field dominance from Upper to Lower, resulting in a better quality DVD, smoother motion, etc.
    There wasn't anything wrong with my HDV exports using the default upper dominance, but I decided to try it, just looking to squeeze out any improvement I could.
    The results were terrible; awfully jerky motion, dot crawl across the top of the image, etc., so I went back to using the default.
    But then I thought, I wonder if the improvement the author saw was because he exported an HDV Quicktime Movie first, then put that into Compressor and switched the field dominance . . .
    I usually export my HDV timeline right out of FCP to best quality DVD in Compressor, without the in between step. Just wondering if anyone else has tried it the way it's mentioned in the article, and if it's made a difference for them.

    Wow, this thread was way back there;
    Anyway, I use a Sony V1U, and shoot 1080i60, and I had been getting acceptable results, but was just looking for a bit more detail.
    After reading the article, I sent a finished project to Compressor both ways; 1st with the default upper field dominance, and then again changing it to lower, as the article recommended. The default upper file looked pretty good, but the 2nd time with it on lower looked terrible; all kinds of motion displacement.
    I've been using the default since, and have not tried it the other way since that first time. When I get time, I'd like to try exporting a QuickTime movie first, then put that into Compressor with the switched lower dominance to see if there's any improvement that way. I usually just export directly to Compressor from the timeline.
    I appreciate the comments, and I'm always interested in any setting changes that might squeeze out some more detail when going from HDV to DVD.

  • Field order issues after export to DV Pal from uncompressed

    We are experiencing some difficulty exporting clips from FCP to our Omneon Server for TX.
    We are capturing 8 bit uncompressed (AJA and Blackmagic) from digibeta for our edit and all editing stays in uncompressed until final output. Our transmission system demands DV PAL files so we export finished items as DV PAL in FCP and drop onto the server
    Our problem is that on playback from the server, the field order is incorrect. Although the exported DV clips properties show lower field order, the clip is obviously playing upper field first. If we capture and edit in DV and export the DV file to the server, then we have no problems. I have tried
    exporting uncompressed clips to DV via Compressor and changing the field order in frame controls but no success. It seems that when a clip is captured and edited in upper field it hangs onto that status even after conversion to DV!! Any thoughts greatly appreciated!

    when you drop one of your 8 bit uncompressed source clips into your DV PAL timeline, is FCP correctly adding the Shift Fields filer to those timeline instances?
    do you edit in 8-bit uncompressed and then export direct to DV PAL or do you nest your 8 bit uncompressed sequence into a DV PAL sequence first and then export as Quicktime Movie w/ current settings? if not the latter, try it (and make sure your nest has the Shift Fields filter applied)

  • Field Order -Progressive, Upper or Lower? (Interlacing?)

    Hi there,
    I am fairly new to exporting videos in premiere pro and wanted to ask any experienced knowledgable users what the
    field order in the export box does if changing between progressive, upper or lower? I have read up on interlacing and de-interlacing as i noticed that my clip when played on the computer shows these horizontal interlacing lines when exported on the default 'upper' field order option and as a test I exported with 'progressive' and the lines had disappeared but I'm wondering if exporting it in progressive reduces the quality of the video in any way?
    This video is to be played on an HD TV most likely for a meeting.
    Reading up that some TVs will automatically de-interlace a clip, does this mean that
    a) I should just leave it interlaced under 'upper' option and know that the horizontal lines won't appear on the TV? (still need to test this)
    or
    b) Just export as progressive as I am entirely wrong about the TV and the horizontal lines will show up on HD TVs unless I export with progressive?
    I am pretty confused!
    Please, I would appreciate any advice on this?
    Sorry if i'm wrong on the things i've said, I am very new to all of this!
    Thank you!

    Hi Jess565,
    Thanks for using Adobe forums,
    You can go ahead and export as Progressive and it will not effect the quality of your video.
    Happy Editing,
    Sandeep

  • Cannot get rid of the horizontal lines (field order or interlacing?)...

    OK- I have footage which is 25fps DV Pal 720/576 (was shot on tape, 4:3 letterboxed), lower field/even which I am editing into a short 25 second sequence which needs to be 16:9 (as my final project will be that, and this footage/sequence is the only 4:3 one in the ten to be used).
    The current sequence I have worked in is showing up as 25fps DVCPRO Pal 1280/720 also lower field/even and it is working OK (NO idea how!) except for the clips I am shrinking for a multiple screen section- they are shrunk to 45% and quite interlaced looking- meaning that I am seeing quite bad horizontal lines even in the playing back of the sequence, before export.
    Notably one clip is FINE- it is different in that it has been "grown" to 180% because of the fact that it was 4:3 letterboxed and I needed it to appear 16:9. I see no interlacing/field order issue...
    What do I need to do in order to "fix" this now that I have a gorgeous sequence and cannot export it to look like anything decent?
    I feel I do NOT understand the settings I should set up for capture, working and export- I am just stabbing in the dark here. I guess a problem I have is that while I learn super fast when shown to do something I don't make the connection when reading manuals well. In other words- if it is not a response to an issue I have I cannot tell that it is the answer I seek. I am so despondent.
    Ideally I would need to be able to fix the mess as the work I have done is long and hard (I am not really a bad editor- creative but clueless when it comes to setting things up right, it would seem!). Please and many, many thanks.

    Thanks for that. It was a horrible blow as he had just been nominated for his first BAFTA and I was so hopeful that he would take me on as an apprentice...
    OK- the issue will be one most students creating showreels will encountering as we don't tend to shoot ideal footage, on different cameras we don't "know", and certainly don't have a say about how it is ingested. So it is a case of doing the best we can with what we have.
    I ended up dealing with it by using Compressor to "reconform" the footage I was using and to also use a 30%/45% scale-down of each of them and made a multi-clip collage of the material. The "problems" are almost lost in the scaling down, so I am OK with it.
    Of course there is still the problem that if I move from the college's Avid system to my home set up of Final Cut Pro I get very annoying issues also with the Avid's exports (QT6) showing up as 5:4 instead of the 16:9 it was exported as!

  • HDV, ProRe, and field order

    Hi all.
    I'm having a field order issue. I have many Quicktime movies in HDV 1080i60. I am trying to convert these to ProRes LT for editing, and then encode the result with a compressor preset for DVD.
    If I use the ProRes LT for interlaced material preset, everything seems fine until I encode that to mpeg2. Compressor detects the ProRes file as interlaced, and I have frame controls off for the mpeg conversion. But the field order appears wrong upon viewing; it appears right if I change the native field dominance to "progressive" before encoding to mpeg2.
    So can anyone tell me why the ProRes behaves as if it is always progressive? I can't figure out what is missing.
    Thanks.
    Jeremy

    Hi all.
    I'm having a field order issue. I have many Quicktime movies in HDV 1080i60. I am trying to convert these to ProRes LT for editing, and then encode the result with a compressor preset for DVD.
    If I use the ProRes LT for interlaced material preset, everything seems fine until I encode that to mpeg2. Compressor detects the ProRes file as interlaced, and I have frame controls off for the mpeg conversion. But the field order appears wrong upon viewing; it appears right if I change the native field dominance to "progressive" before encoding to mpeg2.
    So can anyone tell me why the ProRes behaves as if it is always progressive? I can't figure out what is missing.
    Thanks.
    Jeremy

  • Workaround for compressor HDV to DVD field issue?

    I need a work around for the field issue apparent when down-converting HDV to DVD.
    The Bonsai method <http://www3.telus.net/bonsai/Welcome.html> will not work, as there is too much motion and a side effect of the "fastest" conversion is that it gives a 3-d ghosting effect on fast motion in the frame.
    I can not convert to 720P60 or 480P, as FCP converts it to 30P and then doubles the frames, and the motion is jittery.
    I could dump it to camera and then down-convert in camera, but I have heard this is not a great method either.
    I have seen in another forum to save the HDV timeline in FCP as a HDV quicktime movie, and then import that into DVD studio pro and have it down-convert, but DVD studio pro says this is an "incompatible file".
    How do I get 1080i HDV footage onto a DVD so that it looks acceptable?

    I had a similar problem with HDV (1080i shot on Cannon HV-20) footage, looks great in post and terrible when converted (herringbone lines and too many artifacts.) I’ve successfully used the Bonsai method on another piece I did but the footage was shot on a HVX-200 at 720 24p and there were no “action” shots. I wasn’t as successful using the method using 1080i footage and it definitely didn’t help with the fast motion shots. I did a search in this forum on HD to SD and there are a lot of helpful hints and methods. I experimented with a lot of the suggestions but in the end I was able to produce very nice and acceptable results by doing the following:
    1] I didn’t create an SD sequence; I exported the footage as a Quicktime movie (self contained) straight from my HDV sequence.
    2] I dropped the Quicktime file into Compressor and selected 90-minute DVD Anamorphic Best 2-pass VBR. Running Compressor from Final Cut ties up your system as well as there seems to be a delay between the handoff from Final Cut to Compressor (running the latest 5.x version and 2.3.) Creating a Quicktime file frees your system and it’s debatable if you actually compress faster or take a hit on quality. I’ve tested both from Final Cut and using a Quicktime file and didn't see any real difference in quality.
    3] Change the field dominance from Top to Progressive in the tab where you see 2-Pass VBR Best and also in the encoding tab (not in front of my system so I can’t recall the name or order of the icons). In the encoding tab you will notice it says “same as source.” The pull down will show you Top, Bottom, Progressive, Automatic…I tried them all and in various combinations and anything other than progressive in both tabs produced undesirable results.
    4] The options for Fast, Good, Better and Best in the other encoding pull down sections are a matter of preference and patience. Selecting Best in all categories takes a really long time to compress (36 hours for a 9-minute piece using a Mac Pro 3.0GHz dual-core Intel with 4GB ram.) I ran tests using different combinations and found that selecting the default settings is decent and stepping each category up to the next level helped but not enough to warrant the long compression cycle to stick with Better across the board. When you do your testing, it’s best to use as little footage as possible or you will find yourself waiting too long to see the actual results. I used a 1-second (29 frames) shot of a girl twirling around, hair flying everywhere, and girls next to her using hula-hoop’s.
    5] Use the sliding bar in the viewer to see the impact of your choices before submitting the job. To the right you will see the “original” footage and to the left you can see the results of your selection. You can move the bar across the footage to see (approximately) the end results.
    6] One thing I did notice is that no matter what settings I use, the output is slightly darker (reds were deeper, skin tones were warmer and not as smooth), but hey, you are going from HDV to SD so it’s not going to be perfect.
    Hope that helps and good luck.
    Kenny

  • What do I need to know about field order and HDV?

    I keep seeing field order options in FCP and DVDSP and Compressor etc.
    Can anyone point me to any resources that will help me understand things a little better?
    I'm editing HDV in FCS.
    Thanks
    Miller.

    Field dominance (actually field order) is a function of how video is recorded.
    Each frame of interlaced video is made up of two fields. They are recorded in sequence. At NTSC std video (~30fps) the frames are recorded 1/60th of a second apart.
    We will call the first field recorded: #1 and the second field: #2.
    To play back correctly you need to play the fields in the order they were recorded
    if done correctly it would look like this
    1-2 1-2 1-2
    if the fields are reversed (by using the wrong field order setting) you would get
    2-1 2-1 2-1
    This yields a jerky, strobe like playback as the fields are being played not in the order they were recorded.
    HDV records the Upper field first in each frame and so is termed Upper Dominant
    DV record the Lower field first in each frame and is termed Lower Dominant
    Questions? There will be a quiz on Monday. And NO, it is not open book.
    Cheers,
    x

  • Field Order for Upscaling DVD player

    I have a edited HDV project that I have output to DV using the following settings:
    Video Compressor - DV NTSC
    Field Order: Lower Field First
    When I play this on a standard DVD player everything looks fine. The field order looks correct and the object edges look smooth.
    However when I play the same DVD in an Upscaling DVD player on an HD TV (720p) there is a "comb effect" around the edges of objects.
    I would like the video to play well on both types of setups (non-scaling and upscaling)
    What am I doing wrong? What encoder should I be using to get the correct output on both upscaling players and standard?
    Thanks,
    Mike

    >What am I doing wrong?
    Downscaling HDV and then upscaling it again for HDTV. Best not to do that and just leave the video HD all the way for HD display.
    Get a Blu-ray player is my advice.

  • Interlaced footage in secondary preview - wrong field order.

    I just got CS5 Production Premium and an EVGA GTX 465, which is basically a GTX470 with less CUDA cores (352 instead of 448). I added the card to the list in the Premiere CS5 txt file (the so called hack) and everything seems to work perfect except for one thing. When I play back interlaced footage that I shot with either of my two AVCHD cameras (Canon HF100 and Panasonic AG-HMC40), the footage in the TV set (which is setup as my second monitor) will play with the fields in the right order but after a few seconds it will start playing as if it were progressive, or as if the fields were in the wrong order. Then, eventually, it will go back to play the fields in the right order, and then the wrong order, and go back and forth like that. It switches every ten or twenty seconds. This happens both when the footage is played back in the source window and in the timeline.
    Thanks to the GPU acceleration, it plays smoothly always even with added effects and even with different tracks at different opacity levels (I tried three tracks, one at 25%, another at 50% and the other at 100% and it played without skipping a frame), but I don't understand why it doesn't always send the right field order. I wonder if it has anything to do with the cable that goes to the TV set, since it's DVI on the end that I connect to the video card, and HDMI on the other end. Regardless of that, I purchased the cable from Monoprice and it's a very thick, well shielded cable. The card comes with a mini HDMI output, but the cable that comes with it is not long enough to reach the TV. Still, I'm not sure that it would make a difference.
    Is this happening to any of you? Could this be a problem with the card itself, with my footage, or with Premiere?
    Note: I had switched the "Multi-display/mixed-GPU acceleration" to "Compatibility mode" in the Nvidia control panel and it didn't make a difference in anything related to CS5, whether it's this particular problem or anything else.

    JSS1138 wrote:
    We should probably just get the details, instead of speculation on what hardware is being used.
    Oh, the system is pretty fast, but Premiere always took a huge toll when external preview was enabled, it was like that in CS3 and CS4 as well. But here are my system specs just in case:
    AMD 1090T @3.8 Ghz (stable)
    16 GB of DDR3 G.Skill RAM
    Gigabyte GA-890FXA-UD5
    Western Digital 1.5 Gb Black Edition (as one of the video drives, the OS drive is a standard WD)
    EVGA GTX465 1 GB
    So while this may not be the fastest computer in the world, it's more than fast enough for HD, with 6 cores and 16 GB of RAM.
    This is something that's either wrong with Premiere's design, but maybe there's a workaround, which is what I'm trying to get to. I've been trying many things in the "Manage 3D" section of the Nvidia control panel, but nothing seems to work. VSync on or off, Triple Buffering, etc, etc, the problem is still there.
    Obviously if I right click on the monitor window and instead of "Both Fields" I choose either first or second field, I get just that, but I don't see why do I have to edit interlaced video with just one field instead of both.

  • Field order / interlacing problem

    I convert my mpeg video source files using dropDV, then cut the clips in iMovie.
    If I create a dvd using iDVD and watch it on my tv, there is a nasty shaking effect which is more visible when either the subject or the camera is moving.
    Someone recently told me this problem might be caused by the field order being inverted.
    Can anyone confirm this, or has anyone experienced similar problems?
    Any suggestions how to overcome this problem?
    (So far the only attempt that has not failed was when I exported to iPod .m4v from iMovie and used this file in iDVD... the problem was solved, but of course the resolution is much lower)
    Thanks for your comments!
    Peter
      Mac OS X (10.4.7)  

    welcome Peter to the  board …
    yepp, your discription sounds like a odd/uneven problem...
    I'm not familiar with any prefs/settings in dropDV, but I onced solved simliar problems with the free tool JES Deinterlacer

  • HDV to DVD field issue

    I need a work around for the field issue apparent when down-converting HDV to DVD.
    The Bonsai method will not work, as there is too much motion and a side effect of the "fastest" conversion is that it gives a 3-d ghosting effect on fast motion in the frame.
    I can not convert to 720P60 or 480P, as FCP converts it to 30P and then doubles the frames, and the motion is jittery.
    I could dump it to camera and then down-convert in camera, but I have heard this is not a great method either.
    I have seen in another forum to save the HDV timeline in FCP as a HDV quicktime movie, and then import that into DVD studio pro and have it down-convert, but DVD studio pro says this is an "incompatible file".
    How do I get 1080i HDV footage onto a DVD so that it looks acceptable?

    Just to make sure I undestand you (I am having the same problem...my video looks jagged and not very sharp).
    You're saying to creat a new sequence that is the 720 x 480 10 Bit Uncompressed?
    And then in Settings under field dominance set that to NONE and motion filtering quality to Best. When I put my sequence into this uncompressed timeline, do I need to render it or can I just go straight to compressor? Does it matter?
    Are there any settings within Compressor to change, such as Deinterlacing, field dominance (progressive, lower/even, upper/odd), blur, anti-aliasing?
    I am using HDV 1080i60 Codec to shoot in and edit.
    Thanks so much. I will try your suggestion. Have you used this procedure much?

  • *** HDV to DVD is losing something in the translation

    I'm going from HDV 1080i60 footage to SD-DVD and am still completely unhappy with the text on my projects. Nearly every time the text looks like it's out of register and not at all crisp. The footage looks okay for the most part although it is a lot softer than when I watch the same project through my AppleTV. I understand that DVD is much less resolution than either full HD or DVD but is it unreasonable to expect that the text from my HDV footage looks so bad on DVD? In the days when I'd shoot on my VX2000 and transfer to DVD the text always looked crisp and clean. How could it have gone so far backwards.
    There are a few different workflows I'm currently using so I'm wondering if someone could comment on what I may be doing wrong or what I could tweak to improve the results. Specifically, should I be de-interlacing the footage first in Final Cut Pro or should I be changing the field order in Compressor? What could I do to improve the results?
    Workflow 1:
    FCP>Compressor>DVD 90 minutes best quality encode
    Workflow 2:
    FCP>Self-contained QT movie>Compressor>DVD 90 minutes best quality encode
    Workflow 3:
    Print to tape>Import down-converted to SD into FCP>Compressor>DVD 90 mins best quality
    Workflow 4:
    FCP>self-contained QT movie>Convert to AppleTV (.mp4) with ViddyUp>Compressor>DVD 90 mins best quality
    I'd be extremely thankful for any help that anyone can give. This is an issue I've had a lot of trouble with and need to find a reasonable solution for, soon! Thanks in advance!

    Quite honestly, you'll continue to have this "issue" as long as you use HDV or any format of hd in general to make sd dvds. If you really want to alleviate this problem you're experiencing, don't acquire in any sort of hd video that is destined for dvd at this time.
    You have got to be kidding me. Instead of there being a viable way to convert 1 format to the other you think a reasonable solution is to shoot SD or only author HD-DVD or Blu-ray? It's this unrealistic approach that has a really negative impact on these boards. I am not going to use my HDV camera in SD mode and handcuff myself later on when I truly CAN make HD-DVD or Blu-ray discs easily. Apple has still to develop DVDSP that can do this and don't sell internal Apple burners. So according to your suggestion, I should still be shooting in the dark ages b/c somebody hasn't found a way to convert 1 format to the other. Unfortunately, most clients don't even have HD-DVD or Blu-Ray players yet so DVD is still the norm. Shooting in SD completely limits my ability to upsell the project to HD when they get a player and therefore eliminates a perfectly good revenue stream.

  • Best quality HDV to DVD using Premier Pro CC to Media Encoder CC and Encore

    I have been struggeling to create a decent looking DVD from my HD video.  I am a newbe.  And I have read many, many forum posts trying to learn the best practice and have come out even more confused.  Many posts are back in 2009 and I don't think they apply.  Some recommend dynamic link which does not appear to be an option for me.  So I am hoping to get a clear answer to my problems.  I am including alot of info because I don't know what is really important.
    I have 2 types of video that I am merging into my sequences.
    Sony:
    Format                                   : AVC
    Bit rate                                 : 11.5 Mbps
    Maximum bit rate                         : 16.0 Mbps
    Width                                    : 1 440 pixels
    Height                                   : 1 080 pixels
    Display aspect ratio                     : 16:9
    Frame rate                               : 29.970 fps
    Scan type                                : Interlaced
    Scan order                               : Top Field First
    JVC:
    Format                                   : AVC
    Bit rate                                 : 16.3 Mbps
    Maximum bit rate                         : 17.0 Mbps
    Width                                    : 1 920 pixels
    Height                                   : 1 080 pixels
    Display aspect ratio                     : 16:9
    Frame rate                               : 29.970 fps
    Scan type                                : Interlaced
    Scan order                               : Top Field First
    I set my sequence in Premier Pro CC to
    AVC-Intra 50 1080i
    29.97 fps
    1440 x 1080
    HD Anamorphic 1080 (1.3333)
    30fps Drop-Frame Timecode
    Hopefully I set up my sequence correctly???
    Dynamic Link is not available to me, so I export the sequence.  This is where i get confused.
    I export to MPEG2-DVD.  Preset NTSC DV Wide
    Some forum posts say to tweek the video setting for better quality, this is what I have read:
    quality to 100
    minimum bit rate  4
    target bitrate 6
    maximum bitrate 7
    click maximum render quality
    Since my source has upper field order but PP defaults to lower field order, should I switch to upper?
    I encode in Media Encoder. 
    In Encore, I have my dvd settings:
    MPEG-2
    720x480
    29.97 fps
    Lower fields first  (should this be upper??)
    I have an i5 processor, 8G ram, I am using Mecury GPU accelerator.
    I listed a lot of stuff and I appologize.  I just think the quallity I am getting isn't there.  With these setting and what I am doing, is this as good as the quality gets?
    Help

    Use a 1920 x 1080, 30i sequence for the editing, not 1440 x 1080.
    Start with the MPEG2-DVD option and the NTSC DV Widescreen preset.  Change the Quality to 100.  Change the Field Order from Lower to Upper.  Change the Min, Target and Max bitrates to 5, 7 and 9 respectively.  If you have hardware acceleration turned on, export away.  If you're running in Software Only mode, check the Maximum Render Quality box and then export.
    Bring the resulting video and audio files into Encore for authoring.

  • Need to setup Premiere CS6 sequence for two file types with different field orders

    I have a client who has shot video for me using two cameras, one camera was set to progressive, and the other to interlaced upper field first. I need to use both file types in the edit and have been struggling to set up the sequence to get the best look for the end product, a DVD. I have several videos to do for her that were all shot in the same way, so I need a solution!
    I would appreciate help figuring out how to set up this work flow from beginning to end.
    Should I convert one of the files from the beginning so they match field orders before going into a sequence? Or do I just need to do some adjusting of the files once they are in the sequence? Is it just as simple as changing the transcode settings to favor the upper field first? I'm definitely having issues once the video is transcoded in Encore and you can see a lot of jagged edges and lines especially during movement. My client isn't happy and I've tried several workarounds, but to no avail.
    Here are the two file types I have:
    File extension: .MOV
    H.264, 1920x1080, Linear PCM, 16 bit little-endian signed integer, 48000 Hz, stereo
    FPS 29.97
    No Fields: Progressive Scan
    File extension: .MTS (my Mac finder can't read these files, but they are read in Premiere)
    Image Size: 1920 x 1080
    Frame Rate: 29.97
    Source Audio Format: 48000 Hz - compressed - 6 channels
    Pixel Aspect Ratio: 1.0
    Upper Field First
    I am using Adobe Premiere CS 6.0.2
    Encore 6.0.1
    Media Encoder 6.0.2.81
    I am running it on an iMac 27-inch, Mid 2011
    with Mac OS X Lion 10.7.5
    Processor  3.4 GHz Intel Core i7
    Graphics  AMD Radeon HD 6970M 1024 MB
    I've just been setting the sequence to match the .MOV files since they look much better than the .MTS files. I've done the opposite as well, setting the sequence to match the .MTS files and it doesn't seem to help. I've also changed the field order of the files once they are in the sequence by changing the field options and have tried converting the .MTS files in the Media Encoder, but nothing I've done has worked.
    Any help would be so appreciated! The client I have is a photographer, so she wasn't aware of this issue when she first shot these videos. So I have 10 videos with these issues I need to get back to her, hopefully issue free! I'm struggling as an editor because my last job I was using FCP and was working with videographers who knew what they were doing, so I've never faced such problems before. Plus I'm new to the Adobe software. Not a good combination. Please forgive me if I didn't give all the information you need. I will happily respond with whatever more information you may need to help me out!
    ~KTrouper

    I wonder if you could do your edit ignoring any visual issues of the interlaced footage but keeping the different sources separate ( checkerboard edit Vid 1/ Vid 2 )
    Lock it down then export the interlaced part of the edit as a Digital Intermediate.
    Maybe Export the other source as well to the same codec. DI
    Bring them back together in a New Sequence. You wold have to deal with the black spacing.

Maybe you are looking for