High traffic error

how fix this High Traffic Try Again Later error message in CUCM 7.1.3?

hello,
Can you please confirm you get this error? I mean when dialing some number and that too external or internal?
Br,
Nadeem Ahmed

Similar Messages

High Traffic Call Try Your Again Later. Have solution?

Hi people
I saw n discussions about this theme but somebody found some solution definitive?
I see this problem with Callmanager 6x and 7x and I cannot solve this message on IP Phones.
Thanks
Peterson

Hi guys...
i also faced this issue today and going to apply this solution for see if fix it..
you can try this aslo...
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/phones/ps379/products_tech_note09186a008091c1dc.shtml
Cisco 7900 series IP Phone users do not receive a dial tone from Cisco CallManager, and the High Traffic Try Again Later error messages appears on the phone display when they go off-hook. This document discusses how to troubleshoot this issue.
Problem
Cisco 7900 IP Phones do not receive a dial tone from Cisco CallManager and instead receive a reorder/busy tone when the phone goes off-hook. The High Traffic Try Again Later error message appears on the LCD display of the IP Phone.
Note: This issue occurs intermittently.
Solution
The High Traffic Try Again Later error message that appears on the IP Phones indicates this issue:
Whenever the LowPriorityQueueThrottlingFlag Cisco CallManager service parameter is set to TRUE and the Low Priority queue is over the limit specified by the LowPriorityQueueThrottlingMaxCount Cisco CallManager service parameter, the High Traffic Try Again Later error message appears on the LCD display of any IP Phone that is registered to this Cisco CallManager server and that attempts to go off-hook and make a new call. By default, this message appears on the phone if the Low Priority queue gets deeper than 20 signals.
Generally, the Cisco CallManager works fine as long as the Low Priority queue does not get higher than 100. Therefore, if you never see the Low Priority queue go higher than 75, you can configure the LowPriorityQueueThrottlingMaxCount = 100 Cisco CallManager service parameter in order to overcome this issue.
It is also recommended to check the CPU utilization and the disk space usage. If they are high, you need to clear the hard disk space and shrink the CDR/CAR database.
Warm Regard's
===========
Amit

High Traffic Try again Later-- IP Com

Hi All,
I have this error in my cucm v10 user agent: High Traffic Try again Later
I suppose the problem is related to the high memory usage for the tomcat service. It is possible?
When I run the rtmt I get this error message: Available virtual memory below configured threshold . Configured low threshold is 25 %
tomcat (1858 MB) uses most of the memory
When this problem occurs, I need to restart the tomcat service and its works normally per moment.
Any idea?
Thanks

Hi Marcelo,
Yes, it correct. I have a be6k deploy.

How to use OraSession for a high-traffic IIS/ASP site

Guys,
I am running into scalability issues with our production web server. The ASP requests queued keeps growing to crash the IIS eventually atleast once a day. We don't have any custom COM components and we believe database is not the bottleneck.
We are using one OraSession object in the Application scope as follows:
<OBJECT RUNAT="Server" SCOPE="Application" ID="OraSession" PROGID="OracleInProcServer.XOraSession"></OBJECT>
Sub Application_OnStart
OraSession.CreateDatabasePool 1, 120, 600, "TEST", "scott/tiger", 0
End Sub
We are calling OraSession.GetDatabaseFromPool(9000) whenever we need a database connection. I believe this object since it runs on single thread is unable to handle too much load.
What's the best way of using OraSession/OraServer/OraDatabase objects for a high-traffic web site? The documentation doesn't have enough information. One interesting statement was that "Calling openDatabase method and attaching multiple user sessions(OraDatabase) after an OraServer object is created is useful with IIS like n-tier distributed environments" What does this mean?
I appreciate any help.
Thanks
Krishna

Hi iLac,
I'm not sure what you meant by reverse engineering the browser's interactions with the site, but anything you can do within a browser you can feasibly do through scripts without resorting to a GUI. I'll mention a few tools that will help you out and briefly describe how you can use them to achieve what you want, although a bit more of a specific question may help. Anywhoo...
First up I'd recommend Firebug for Firefox. A great tool that will let you visually inspect different elements of a rendered page in your browser to see the source code underneath. It also allows you to edit the page so you can test form input. (For example changing a Post to Get request to see the syntax.
Next is "Live HTML Headers" which is also an addon for Firefox. Setting it to record and then clicking on a link will log all interaction between your browser and the website (eg. cookies, browser/system info, redirects etc.). You can really see what is going on behind the scenes.
Finally you are going to want to use cURL which is a command line tool in the Terminal. Here is a like to a tutorial which will cover what you need [[http://curl.haxx.se/docs/httpscripting.html]] Basically cURL can interact with websites and download the source code for you (you will have to spoof cookies, and all other session info which could be a little difficult depending on the site, if you have to log in etc.).
And that is about it. Using those three resources you can get anything off the web you can get with a browser. You just need to write an applescript to run the right cURL commands and extract the info from the HTML.
If you have any other questions or need clarification or more help feel free to ask. Perhaps with a bit more detail on what exactly you are trying to achieve. My experience comes from auto updating homemade sports pools.
Good Luck.

How to make high traffic for a Web Service?

Hi there,
I have build a simple Web Service and I would like to test its delay under high traffic environment.
I have also built a client that consumes the Web Service. I want to run the client about 100 times simultaneously.
Is this possible? And if it is, then could you tell me a way on how to run them?
I have deployed the Web Service in the Sun Application Server 8.2.
Thanks in advance.

SSZ wrote:
Yes.But couldn't understand where to start.In that case use the magic wand.
Ask specific questions, Many of your posts have an underlying tone , that of you not having read any documentation of bothered to research anything yourself I havent got the time to tell you how if you havent got the time to tell me what you have read , what you grasp and what you do not grasp.

Safari struggles with high traffic websites.

As the title really. If I go onto a website that has a lot of traffic then Safari struggles and doesn't load the page. This site being one of them. I have a fairly decent broadband speed but if I use the superfast WiFi in the local apple store then I don't have a problem. If Safari struggles then it causes my iTunes music to skip when played at loud volumes. I was in the kitchen yesterday and had my music turned up full and the song started skipping really badly follwed by my left speaker popping and totally dying.
All this since downloading Lion.

When I go to high traffic sites it works for a minute or two but once it stops working the only way to get it working again is to reboot my MacBook Pro.

High traffic service

im using sun one 8 in a high traffic enviroment.
My questions are:
Does sun one 8 app server has the same or better performance than Son one 7 ?
I dont find a tuning guide for sun one 8, there is one for sun 7, is this guide for Sun one 8 also ?
Where can I find documentation for Sun One Application server tuning on high traffic enviroments.
Thank you for your help

Acutualy, Sun ONE Application Server 8 PE is a developper support.
You should not use it in the high traffic enviroment.
If you want this, you should use the AppServer7.1SE/EE or
you should wait a release of AppServer8 SE.
Thanks,
- Nocky

Very very high FEC Errors.

Hi all.
I have very very high FEC errors. I got 4294967263 errors in 5 minutes! It seems far too high.
My Broadband connection keeps dropping out too. I have changed all the filters and cabling. Don't know what else to try.
Thanks in advance.

Here you go ......
Connection information
Line state
Connected
Connection time
0 days, 0:11:52
Downstream
11,483 Kbps
Upstream
1,183 Kbps
ADSL settings
VPI/VCI
0/38
Type
PPPoA
Modulation
ITU-T G.992.5
Latency type
Interleaved
Noise margin (Down/Up)
9.1 dB / 5.6 dB
Line attenuation (Down/Up)
31.0 dB / 18.0 dB
Output power (Down/Up)
0.0 dBm / 12.5 dBm
Loss of Framing (Local)
0
Loss of Signal (Local)
0
Loss of Power (Local)
0
FEC Errors (Down/Up)
295 / 4294967263
CRC Errors (Down/Up)
3 / N/A
HEC Errors (Down/Up)
N/A / 0
Error Seconds (Local)
1
Hide Details

Service resetoutbound and high traffic

Guys,
Need your experience here, ..
By default, service resetoutbound is enabled for all interfaces. The formal definition of resetoutbound is sends TCP resets for all outbound TCP sessions that attempt to transit the ASA and are denied by the ASA based on access lists or AAA settings. The ASA also sends resets for packets that are allowed by an access list or AAA, but do not belong to an existing connection and are denied by the stateful firewall.
Based on that definition, ASA will send back TCP reset to ip source which have traffic block by ACL or AAA (CMIIW). What happen if the source still try to reconnect (*after the source receive "TCP reset", it reset the connection, but by application it try to reconnect again)? Can it cause high traffic ?
*Based on experience i have found log in ASA which have a lot "connection re-attempt" like this :
2012-11-13 20:12:08          Local4.Info          xxx.xxx.93          %ASA-6-302013: Built inbound TCP connection 7411196 for outside:xxx145.201/38733 (xxx145.201/38733) to inside:xxx.xxx.1/2000 (xxx.xxx.1/2000)
2012-11-13 20:12:08          Local4.Info          xxx.xxx.93          %ASA-6-302014: Teardown TCP connection 7411196 for outside:xxx145.201/38733 to inside:xxx.xxx.1/2000 duration 0:00:00 bytes 196 FIN Timeout
2012-11-13 20:12:08          Local4.Info          xxx.xxx.93          %ASA-6-106015: Deny TCP (no connection) from xxx145.201/38733 to xxx.xxx.1/2000 flags ACK on interface outside
2012-11-13 20:12:08          Local4.Info          xxx.xxx.93          %ASA-6-302013: Built inbound TCP connection 7411198 for outside:xxx145.204/28317 (xxx145.204/28317) to inside:xxx.xxx.1/2000 (xxx.xxx.1/2000)
2012-11-13 20:12:08          Local4.Info          xxx.xxx.93          %ASA-6-302014: Teardown TCP connection 7411198 for outside:xxx145.204/28317 to inside:xxx.xxx.1/2000 duration 0:00:00 bytes 196 FIN Timeout
2012-11-13 20:12:08          Local4.Info          xxx.xxx.93          %ASA-6-106015: Deny TCP (no connection) from xxx145.204/28317 to xxx.xxx.1/2000 flags ACK on interface outside
2012-11-13 20:12:08          Local4.Info          xxx.xxx.93          %ASA-6-302013: Built inbound TCP connection 7411200 for outside:xxx145.202/28526 (xxx145.202/28526) to inside:xxx.xxx.1/2000 (xxx.xxx.1/2000)
2012-11-13 20:12:08          Local4.Info          xxx.xxx.93          %ASA-6-302014: Teardown TCP connection 7411200 for outside:xxx145.202/28526 to inside:xxx.xxx.1/2000 duration 0:00:00 bytes 196 FIN Timeout
2012-11-13 20:12:08          Local4.Info          xxx.xxx.93          %ASA-6-106015: Deny TCP (no connection) from xxx145.202/28526 to xxx.xxx.1/2000 flags ACK on interface outside
2012-11-13 20:12:09          Local4.Info          xxx.xxx.93          %ASA-6-302013: Built inbound TCP connection 7411202 for outside:xxx145.204/39240 (xxx145.204/39240) to inside:xxx.xxx.1/2000 (xxx.xxx.1/2000)
2012-11-13 20:12:09          Local4.Info          xxx.xxx.93          %ASA-6-302014: Teardown TCP connection 7411202 for outside:xxx145.204/39240 to inside:xxx.xxx.1/2000 duration 0:00:00 bytes 196 FIN Timeout
Regards

Hello Fara,
By default that is how the TCP protocol works, I mean after a TCP connection gets dropped they will try to inittiate it and connect but again if this connection is invalid (because of any of the Accelerated security path algorithm value) it will get dropped.
So you need to do captures in order to determine what is goin on and finally download them and analizing wireshark,
Regards

Phone Showing "High Traffic Please Try Again Later"

Hi,
We have CUCM 7.1.3 with 600 phones registered to it.
I have observed the following message appearing on all Ip Phones for 5 min.
"High Traffic Please Try Again Later"
Could you Please tell me the possible reasons for this.
I have attached SDI logs for the same.
Regards
Ankita Vig

Hey Ankita,
Did it happen to all the phones?
Was it at the remote site you faced the issue? Possibility is the bandwidth wasnt available for the calls to route;hence the message
You might want to check the locations and bandwidth assigned where the issue occurred and reset it.
Rest i havent gone through traces as if now.
Regards
Jayant

Any advice of high-traffic WS usage?

I read the Guide of WS in R17, and still I try to figure out the best approach.
We have a Web site that uses OD Integration services on back-end. Web users are not OD users - so the server uses a pre-configured user account to connect to OD WS.
Since all Web requests are processed by different threads, the sessions cannot be exactly shared, so I understand one needs to have some common connection, which is used synchronously.
And we use "stateful" session: some oprations like inserting many records, etc., as I understand are designed for stateful sessions.
Now, if we would have high traffic with hundreds of requests - and request may take a second or two to execute - that will definitely slow down every Web user.
What's others' experience? How would you design such site? Have a connection pool - but aren't we limited to one session per OD user? Run several requests from different threads - but isn't it not recommended? What are those "queued requests" (5 max) the Guide talks about?
Thank you for sharing ideas.

Hi
I had exactly the same problem with SmartSync! I had tried everything and the only way to solve this problem if you restore your phone AS A NEW iPHONE. If you do a simple restore that will not solve the problem, tried it! Above you can read my comment where I shared my experiencies! Here it is again:
Hi,
Yeah it is quite annoying! It did reminded me to the old windows times... But I guess it is the smartsync app that somehow chrashes the ios or something. I am not sure. But finally, nothing worked for me and nobody could help me. So finally I had to do a restore and restore it as a new iPhone. What of course delete every personal things from your phone but I just realized that in the age of iCloud it is not that a big problem I mean my contacts where synced with icloud without a problem and because of in my itunes i had all my preveious apps, it wasnt that hard either to put them back to my phone! So it is not an end of the world thing. Took maybe 1 hour to have my phone back. Oh yeah, and after doing this, the problem disappeared so it works great again! But might wanna go back to appstore and leave some nice ratings about this app because for me it seems causing the problem!
good luck! and dont use smartsync any more btw, i found an other app called Syncy what basically does the same as smartsnyc, only with out crashing your phone

Window the error "High Severity Error''

sir i have error in window serever 2008 r2 enterprise when we start window the error "High Severity Error '' showing and hangup server.please resolve the problem.

Hi,
Did you install SQL server on the windows server?
https://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa937483%28v=sql.80%29.aspx?f=255&MSPPError=-2147217396
Please post the detailed error message for troubleshooting.
Regards.
Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help and unmark them if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Support, contact [email protected]

Cisco 7609 router received higher traffic than upstream provider router is sending

Hi all,
I have a Cisco 7609 router that connects to our upstream provider router using 3rd party DWDM Fiber backhaul provider.
The upstream provider router is a Juniper router that had capped our port speed to 1.1Gbps, the backhaul provider didn't capped our port speed and the maximum speed is 2Gbps since it's a 2x1Gbps port channel interface.
I have noticed that our 7609 router able to receive traffic that exceeds 1.1Gbps, and the highest traffic able to received is 1.3Gbps and more.
I have crossed checked the MRTG graph provided by our upstream provider as well as our PRTG graph and indeed we are receiving higher bandwidth than our upstream provider is sending.
I'd like to know if anyone know how it is possible to receive traffic that is higher than what the neighbor router is sending?
Regards

Hi at all,
We found a solution for this Problem !!
We always and always got this error:
%PQUICC-1-LOSTCARR: Unit 0, lost carrier. Transceiver problem?
The problem was the cable! The following pin-out is required:
                                        1 ----- 1
                                        2 ----- 2
                                        3 ----- 6
                                        4 ----- 5
                                        5 ----- 4
                                        6 ----- 3
                                        7 ----- 7
                                        8 ----- 8
We used this and the fault has disappeared!!
The only problem that still exists:
After the first connection the router must be rebooted because otherwise no more additional session is established.
Thanks for all answers.
Regards,
Mario

High availability error on presence

Good Day,
I have problem with HA on cisco presence cluster , the error is showing that Node status for the high avaliability is (Running in Backup Mode) and Node Reason (Peer Down During Initialization).
I have restart Sip proxy service as request from document but it's the same Any Help ASAP please
please see the attached
Regards
Ayman

Hello
It seems that the checkbox "Enable High Availability" just above your screenshot is not checked.
See status message and solutions with this link.
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/cups/8_6/english/install_upgrade/deployment/guide/dgcupc.html
You can try
- Utils system restart of CUPS Publisher
- Wait 10 minutes
- Utils system restart of CUPS Subscriber
Then when both servers are up
- Uncheck HA and Save
- Check HA and Save
- Click on Rebalance users if load sharing is needed
JC

Db_verify: Suspiciously high nelem Error from Berkely DB

I have an application which uses Berkely DB ( Version 3.2.9). My application runs on Solaris. Sometime I get following error message
thrown by the application -
"db_verify: Suspiciously high nelem of 4294967287 on page 0
DB_VERIFY_BAD: Database verification failed."
There is no problem with my database and all records are intact. I came to know that this is a known problem is Berkely DB and there is some patch available for this.
Can anyone please let me know what patch is available for this problem and where I can get the details of this patch ?
Regards
Lalit.

Hi Bogdan,
Thanks for your reply.
I came to know about this problem from Linux discussion from. Here is the link which taks about similar problem in Berkeley DB
https://www.redhat.com/archives/rpm-list/2002-June/msg00118.html
It talks about a Berkely DB patch #4491, but I am unable to find any information about this patch.
As I mentioned, my DB is not corrupt. If I ignore this error, the application work fine and all the records in the DB are intact.
Regards
Lalit.
Hi Lalit,
I came to know that this is a known
problem is Berkely DB and there is some patch
available for this.Where did you come to know that from?
I think that this corruption can happen if you don't
close the library properly.
What you can do is:
1. Upgrade;
2. You could salvage the database and re-load it when
corruption occurs, using the db_dump utility and the
-r or -R options.
3. You can transactionally protect your application
and running recovery in the case of application or
system failure.
Regards,
Bogdan Coman

High traffic error

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for