Highest res export for qt

I'm on pal 16.9 and I need to export the highest res quicktime for the internet. I'm told that it will be converted to a flash slv file.

Jim is right as far as I am concerned. Export to Quicktime Movie will yield the best results, but you will have a pretty hefty file size for internet use, which is what you said you were going to be doing.
So what you could do is export your sequence to Quicktime Movie and then run it through compressor for your specific internet needs.
To give you more guided compressor settings can you tell us what you are using it for on the internet? Are we talking YouTube quality or something else? Streaming or Download? Just give us some more info please.

Similar Messages

  • Highest quality export

    whats the highest quality export for dvd. I have a client who wants to watch it on computer, tv and projection with best quality.
    Also, is a video_TS file better quality than a fcp quicktime mov file?

    To get the highest quality export for DVD, you will need to buy Compressor 4 and create your own preset -- you will need to calculate the max bps based on the amount of video and the size of the DVD (SL vs DL).
    Video_TS isn't a file, it is a folder and part of the structure of the DVD. DVDs use mpeg2, which is highly compressed and there will be a maximum level of quality you can get based on the length of the video.
    A quicktime mov file by itself can contain most any codec, and thus any level of quality. But generally speaking, it is meant for viewing on computers, unless you have a streaming solution with something to decode it for the TV.
    If your original source is HD, you could consider outputting to blu-ray.

  • More trouble with exporting for web

    Alright,
    Sorry to say but I am still having trouble converting/exporting my film trailer to the website for PC users to be able to access it.
    I converted it to a quicktime movie film from FCP, which plays beautifully but apparently PC users can't see it still.
    I have tried exporting to Compressor and tried every format there (mobile devices, web and so on...) they all came out pretty blurry.
    Does anybody have a full proof plan for converting/exporting for website viewing (PC and Mac compatible)?????
    P.S. It may help some of you to see the problem on the page http://www.inthelandofsmiles.com/Site/Film_Trailer.html
    THANKS IN ADVANCE!

    I will second the Flash suggestion. Great a .flv file and play it on your site with a flv player. Some are more difficult than others to use.
    NOTHING is fool proof with this kind of stuff. Flash has the highest install rate on all computers and is as close as you can get to fool proof. You can also put a link on you site to download the latest flash player. The other plus is that it tends to have the best results with low file sizes. This is what YouTube and similar sites use to play their video.
    PS. I highly suggest this flv player... It's free for non-commercial use and almost free for other uses...
    http://www.jeroenwijering.com/?item=JWFLVPlayer

  • Edit Low-Res, Export High-Res

    Is there a way to edit with low-resolution video files (for quicker rendering times) and when the project is finished, final cut can access the corresponding high-res files for output?
    Gopro automatically creates .mp4 files and .lrv files after a shoot.  The .mp4 files are 1080p and my computer has trouble even wathcing them.  The .lrv files (stands for low-resolution video) are like 480p and would be awesome to edit with, as long as final cut could keep track of all the snips and affects and apply them to the corresponding high-resolution .mp4 files.
    anyone ever heard of or done anything like this? seems like it would help a lot.

    LeRoyDankins wrote:
    interesting.. multipe drives, i didnt even know FCP kept such good track of all your drives!
    I'm no good in 'details', but like to explain 'concepts':
    when you cut a video, you don't literally splice a 100MB file into two 50MBs ones
    think of FCPX basicly as a data-base: there's a pool of data (Events); there are lists of instructions (Projects) - the lists don't touch the content. Same concept with Proxies: the Preview window is so tiny - why shoveling the GBs back'n forth, if a 'reduced' version is on display anyhow? No need to edit 'natively': the 'edit list' = Project has to use the originals only on export.-
    so, FCPX handles here <counting> six drives. And I'm just a soccer-dad, doin' weekend reports (ok, using 5 cams, all diff. standards - shoestring budget) - no problem. It's me who needs EventManagerX not to get lost with all this games and players and seasons and stuff 
    vice versa: one of the biggest mistakes is to confuse this data-base by moving files 'behind its back' - soooo many reports 'Events lost!', just because some smart moved data OUTside FCPX via Finder - no wonder, the data-base loses track!
    last word about the concept of data base: that's why 'file names' and manual folders are completely waste of time - tags are much better, add as many key-words and meta-data you like - and let the data base find the clips for you (a computer is much faster in search'n find).-
    LeRoyDankins wrote:
    … i'll have to try that out for myself...
    It works surprisingly well! I was a huge fan of iMovie for years, and when switching to the Big Toy, my first concern was 'will it blend compute?' No budget here for a new Mac - and it does perform well. Very well. For a slow guy like me ..........

  • CS3 XDCam export for FCP

    Currently running CS3 PP on PC.  Shooting xdcam that creates .mp4 files.  We have Matrox boards so editng in PP with 720p 60fps natively is no problem, no rendering with project settings set up properly.  Editing 2 to 3 and half minute features that need to be exported for use with FCP for broadcast in a production truck.  MOV files as quicktime makes the most sense, but what codec and how to create the best looking 720p HD feature while not giving the producer a huge file.  I've been told by him that a minute of HD video should be around 1 gig.  Do I need a third party (Sorenson, etc.) to create properly or use Adobe Media Encoder.  Or should I export as a movie.
    Really looking forward to getting some opinions and help on this.  Thanks!
    Tom

    You could ask the guys using FCP what codec(s) they like...thats your best bet.
    My producer for this project is not the "easiest" to deal with if you get my drift so to speak, won't give simple answers or take the time to figure it out and move on, so I'm left to figure it out for him.  He's never wrong
    you could try tests of small segments of your timeline ...using QT ( mov ) using jpeg 2000, animation ( RLE ? ) and UT YUL2 422 ( what renderer are you using for the project in premiere ? )..  these would make large files, probably have to deliver via external HD.
    Trying to keep files size small, playing out of his mac book and outputing in the production truck
    Basically fcp likes pro res 422 type stuff..I would ask those guys using FCP what would work best for them.
    pro ress 422 is not a codec that cs3 pp has as an option.  I did watch the producer use streamclip third party converter to get it to play out and it looked great during last night's broadcast here in Florida.  I think he said export as apple dv/dvcpro - ntsc, 1280x720 (HDTV 720p) and that worked for him.  When I bring that file into my project storyboard it is 16x9 but not scaled to my project specs.
    Thanks for your input, great to get my first reply in the forum!  Just recently joined after owning our system since Jan. 2009.

  • Export for flash-movie file conversion.

    I want to prepare files for the highest quality possible for conversion to flash-movie files. I recorded in HDV- edited in HDV- send to Color in HDV- and now my question is if I should send it to FCP from Color in 10 bit-uncompressed to keep the highest quality?
    Also at the end exporting from FCP- should I change my sequence settings? Again I need the very highest quality for later conversion to a flash-movie file, and was told that uncompressed is the way to go??
    Any thoughts on this?
    Thanks- Adam.

    "Keeping" the quality isn't really the issue-- if you're working in HDV, there's nothing to gain by going to Uncompressed, because you weren't working in Uncompressed in the first place. The exception to this is color grading and graphics: ideally, you would be working in a higher quality sequence such as ProRes (Uncompressed is probably overkill) in both FCP and Color.
    Of course, I can't honestly say that any of this will make a difference in a Flash movie-- Flash is for web delivery, and to bring it down to a bitrate suitable for the web, you'll likely lose anything you might have gained from this process.

  • Exporting for Archival Question

    I want to export from iMovie in the highest quality format for archival on a Western Digital external 1TB firewire drive. I have captured my video from an analog camcorder through a Canopus ADVC110.
    My questions are:
    1. Which format is the highest quality (regardless of size restrictions)?
    2. Which settings under 'options' within this format do I need to choose?

    1. Which format is the highest quality (regardless of size restrictions)?
    DV, AIC, and H.264 with an unlimited video data rate , and Apple Animation all produce high quality files. (I tend to prefer the Animatio codec since it seems to render truer "blacks" and more saturated colors but at its fullest quality data rate setting its data rate can exceed the capabilities of my older PPC G5 to handle it.) If interested, here is a link to a file containing a motion comparison of DV, Animation, AIC, and unlimited H.264 in a single player. You can step through the short clip to compare the rendering of the various codecs on a frame-by-frame basis to see if you prefer one over any of the others. Be advised that this is literally four movies in one container and is relatively large file for its rater short duration. (I.e., it take a long time to cache or download.) SAMPE COMPARISON MOVIE FILE
    WARNING: You should also be advised that if you archives are to be re-imported to iMovie '08, the Apple Animation compression format it totally unsuitable for this purpose since it currently will not re-export from an iMovie '08 project.
    2. Which settings under 'options' within this format do I need to choose?
    I prefer AIFF ("Big Endian" linear PCM for audio. Since video data rate are either unlimited, pre-set, or tied to the quality setting, about the only thing you can change is the display size, whether it is output as an interlaced or progressive file, the frame rate (which should never be changed if it can be avoided), Key framing (which is usually a personal preference but you may want all Intraframes here), and color depth if offered (I usually prefer full where possible). These are areas where there are bound to be differences in opinions as to what "best" settings actually means so I normally advise users to experiment a bit to determine what looks "best" to them.

  • FCP quicktime "iphone "export diff then quicktime "export for iphone web"??

    so what i dont get, is when i export out of quicktime using "export for web" and i choose the "iphone" 900 kbit option, i get 480X270 beautiful true widescreen clips. But when I export using quicktime conversion in final cut pro 6 and i choose" iphone"....i get 480X360. Why does this happen? I want true widescreen, just like everything i get from itunes.....not this 360 size (which i know is the phones screen res, but who cares)?

    Alistair
    Earlybird is exporting H264 ... the Key Frames setting is determining the GOP length. This value should really be determined based on the complexity of the video, to my understanding, the actual frame rate has no bearing on it. If you have very complex fast moving content then a low Key Frame rate is advisable to ensure good image quality (although it will adversely affect the filesize) whereas if you have slow moving or static content (like an interview subject) then a higher Key Frame rate will still produce a good image but at a smaler filesize. The default of 24 should be pretty much fine as a catchall starting point.
    Earlybird
    Corrupted render files (and render references) can be a pain because FCP will use those files and references  in place of the original media when building the export. And so it should as it does't want to waste time re-rendering sections that are apparently already rendered. Unfortuantely, as noted, if the render file has gone bad and/or starts referencing the wrong media then you'll get these wierd flashes of completely unexpeced and unwanted footage showing up where it shouldn't be. When you trash those files then QT / FCP will just go back and re-reference the original media ... so it's usually a worthwhile step to take just in case thats the problem.  The worse case scenario is that it only that doesn't work and you spend some time unecessarily re-rendering.
    As to why these files go bad? That I don't know. Why do Preferences get corrupted? That I don't know either but it definitely happens :-(
    Cheers
    Andy

  • What are highest quality export settings from iMovie to FCE 4.0?

    I am using iMovie '08 to create Ken Burns effect movies from iPhoto photos to import into FCE. I want the least amount of loss from iMovie to FCE.
    What are the highest quality settings for exporting from iMovie to FCE.
    I do not care about size of file etc. Highest quality is all that matters to me.
    Cheers,
    Chuck

    Well here are the facts.
    My original question rephrased: "I want to know what are the settings to export Ken Burns created movies (therefore using photos) from iMovie (in this case iMovie '08) with the least loss and regardless of file size for importation into Final Cut Express".
    I went to the local Apple store and some of the users (employees) of Final Cut Pro mentioned appropriately they thought .DV would be the best. However when we played some created videos they looked horrible when compared to .MOV with H.264. This just did not make sense, but we went by what we were seeing. Not being able to think with this I did more research and found this article which explained why .DV lookes like pooh pooh compared to H.264 video.
    The article http://docs.info.apple.com/article.html?artnum=93002 explains a setting in Quicktime preferences that if not selected some videos appear pixelated.
    So, when this preference in Quicktime is selected (never thought to try playing on VLC) the .DV movies look better than those using H.264. So with this resolved then my trial and error testing was realistic. That is I could try different export settings and see which ones looked better to determine the best export setting.
    I tried what I thought was everything as far as "Export using Quicktime..." settings. Then I read in "iMovie '08 & iDVD: The Missing Manuals" under "The Video Codecs: A Catalog" an explanation of every type of compression when using the settings under "Movie to QuickTime Movie". Finally someone wrote more data on the codecs. I never found such explanation on the apple website (discussions etc). I really got tired of reading how H.264 is the better than sliced bread "greatest quality for the file size" which I think is true but did nothing to answer my original question. The book then mentioned the option "none". I was like I don't remember this option for "Compression Type". (BTW this all applies to iPhoto '08, Final Cut Express 4, and QuickTime Pro). So I tried "None".
    Wow! Zero pixelation! Vivid colors! So I created three videos. One using H.264, DV/DVCPRO - NTSC and None (I had already tried many others but for this last experiment just these three). I also maxed out the Quality for each compressor. Results:
    - H.264 colors looked a little faded from the original photos and minor minor fuzziness, file size about 6 MB
    - DV/DVCPRO - NTSC colors a little more vivid and less fuzziness, file size about 60 MB
    - None...Bam! absolutely photo quality resolution and color, file size about 600 MB. I didn't care about the size.
    So, bingo "None" as as the compressor settings in Quicktime to export iMovie '08 Ken Burns effect slide shows for importation into Final Cut Express (FCE) with minimal loss and who cares about the file size. Yeah, this is mammoth file but this allows me to make snappy Extremely High Quality Ken Burns effect videos in iMovie for FCE. Then when I export from FCE I don't make a copy of a copy but make my first compression of the video.
    That is my answer!
    I consider this thread closed and will only open if I find any of this is incorrect. BTW I already imported the iMovie '08 video with compression "None" into FCE and after rendering it looks awesome and plays well.
    Cheers,
    Chuck

  • Exporting For YouTube - Premiere Pro CS5 (Canon XL2)

    I shot a promo video with my Canon XL2, and would like to upload the finished product to YouTube at the highest possible quality in order to help promote the company I work for.
    Footage shot in 30p at 29.97 fps, 16:9 - NTSC.
    Sequence settings are all correct and match my footage perfectly.
    I have exported the video as H.264, AVI, MOV, MP4, MP2, WMV and countless other formats. When played on my computer the video quality is SUPERB. I am ecstatic at how it turned out, HOWEVER, when I upload the video -in any format- to YouTube, it looks absolutely horrible - as though it were shot with a webcam.
    Does anyone have any advice as to what I might be doing wrong? Anyone had any experience with the XL-2 and Premiere Pro videos being ugly when uploaded to YouTube?
    Thanks a bunch!

    Be very careful when using Adobe's presents for YouTube, Vimeo, etc.  They have a fixed frame rate but it doesn't always match your source frame rate and this adds additional render time and can drop or add (adding is much worse) frames.
    The worst offender is a preset that is for non drop-frame 30.0 fps (instead of drop frame 29.97) because every 3 seconds 3 frames get added.
    Also be aware that when exporting for the web (or most anything other than to DVD), you want to use square pixels.
    This might require a bit of tweaking with the presets but it is well worth the effort.
    864x480 is the square pixel equivalent to 720x480 widescreen (1.21...).
    For more indepth info on the presets (and my rants on the matter) - have a look at my CS5 and C5.5 articles.
    http://www.eventdv.net/Articles/News/Feature/Benchmarking-Adobe-Premiere-Pro-CS5-70277.htm
    (under the heading "Don't trust the presets")
    http://www.eventdv.net/Articles/ReadArticle.aspx?ArticleID=74852
    (under the heading "Working with watch folders in Adobe Media Encoder CS5.5")

  • Problem with Exporter for MS Access 3.2 in SQL Developer

    Hi,
    I have problem with exporting tables and data from MS Access to XML with Exporter for MS Access 2000.
    This error ocurr: 'Error #5 - XML Exporter'
    When I use Exporter for MS Access 2002 this error ocurr: 'Error #3478 - XML Exporter'
    Any leads how to solve this problem ?

    Thread moved to Forum Home » Database » SQL Developer
    SQL Developer
    Please, stay tune there.
    Nicolas.

  • Edit Color Sync for Exports for Web Sites

    Hi,
    Perhaps this has been covered, but I've not found the thread. Most of the export color sync questions seem to revolve around printing or displaying on one's own monitor. Neither is an issue for me. However, I note that my RAW images exported from Aperture 2.0 as jpg's and then uploaded to web sites such as Jalbum and Orkut are washed out. Some forums have suggested this is due to those websites being optimized for sRGB. I understand that Aperture uses a proprietary color sync profile; however, my default EXIF - Expanded shows "Color Model" as simply "RGB", and "Profile Name" is Adobe RGB (1998) (my Canon 50D is set to sRGB). Again, I have seen suggestions on this forum that one can change these settings, but the process appears to be only for printers and monitors. Where/how can I change the export for uploading jpg's to the web.
    Thanks,
    Nick

    I understand that Aperture uses a proprietary color sync profile
    If the profile were proprietary, it would be an illegal profile under the ICC Specification.
    However, I note that my RAW images exported from Aperture 2.0 as jpg's and then uploaded to web sites such as Jalbum and Orkut are washed out.
    If you did not disable embedding of an ICC source colour space in Aperture, if you did not use a non-ICC enabled browser, the OS X system level services will set up a ColorWorld and convert the pixels in your JPEGs matching from the ICC source colour space to the ICC destination colour space of your display. Thus you will get what you uploaded in the first place.
    I have seen suggestions on this forum that one can change these settings, but the process appears to be only for printers and monitors.
    The idea is that each and every colour device is calibrated and that calibration is captured in a colourimetric colour characterisation from which an ICC colour device profile is computed. Colourants that form certain colours one one colour device at one calibration will form other colours in the same colour device at another calibration and in other colour devices at yet other calibrations. By means of device profiles, the COLOURS can be kept constant while the COLOURANTS are recomputed to compel the device to paint the closest possible match it is capable of.
    Some forums have suggested this is due to those websites being optimized for sRGB.
    The issue is whether people who post pictures do or do not embed ICC source colour spaces into their pictures and whether they pick browsers that are ICC-enabled or pick colour blind browsers.
    To determine if there is an embedded ICC source colour space in a picture, download the picture to disk, open iApple Preview and select Tools > Get Info > Summary.
    Colour Model: This defines the format or model of the colourants, e.g. three component RGB, four component CMYK.
    ColorSync Profile: This defines the ICC source colour space. If there is none in the image file, the system level service assigns the Generic RGB Profile for model RGB, the Generic CMYK Profile for model CMYK and so forth. Therefore, any ICC source colour space than a Generic Profile source colour space is embedded in the image file itself.
    In technical terms, the rule is that to construct a ColourWorld that does a colour space conversion through the PCS Profile Connection Space, you have to have an ICC source colour space and an ICC destination colour space (typically your display profile). It follows that the system level service ASSIGNS an ICC source colour space automatically where is none embedded. The ICC source colour space that is assigned when there is none embedded is the Generic RGB Profile for colourant model RGB, as explained.
    /hh

  • Mail export for OS 10.8.5

    Mail export for OS 10.8.5 (OS Mountain Lion):
    How to export your mailbox?
    Press Option button (keyboard) AND select "Go" folder using your mouse at the top of the window in Finder.
    Look for "Library" on the menu bar.  After you select the Library, you will see Mail folder.
    Open that Mail folder.
    There is only one folder that shows you "V2."  I do not know why it is created.  Go look inside that folder.
    Now, you see your created mail folder such as Mailboxes, MailData, POP- ... folders, and RSS.  Please becareful.
    Please go back two times (arrow left) where you found Mail folder.
    Finally, you drag that specific folder manually - Mail folder   into your external hard disk drive.  That's what you wanted for your backup.
    Hope that help!

    Mail export for OS 10.8.5 (OS Mountain Lion):
    How to export your mailbox?
    Press Option button (keyboard) AND select "Go" folder using your mouse at the top of the window in Finder.
    Look for "Library" on the menu bar.  After you select the Library, you will see Mail folder.
    Open that Mail folder.
    There is only one folder that shows you "V2."  I do not know why it is created.  Go look inside that folder.
    Now, you see your created mail folder such as Mailboxes, MailData, POP- ... folders, and RSS.  Please becareful.
    Please go back two times (arrow left) where you found Mail folder.
    Finally, you drag that specific folder manually - Mail folder   into your external hard disk drive.  That's what you wanted for your backup.
    Hope that help!

  • How can I create a high res image gallery, need to have print res photos for a pressroom section.

    How can I create a high res image gallery, need to have print res photos for a pressroom section.

    If you want Muse to "pass through" your images and not adjust, compress, crop etc - you need to place your images in the lightbox EXACTLY at the right size, pre-cropped and prepped in Photoshop.
    So if your light box is 800x600 the image you're dropping into that must be 800x600 exactly with no effects, rotation etc added to the lightbox frame. This stop Muse fiddling with your images, if they are perfect when inserted and you're not asking Muse to crop, expand, add effects etc. If it's perfect when inserted, Muse SHOULD also leave the resolution alone too, but I have not tried that one, but in theory, it should work.

  • Export for web doesn't work (X and 7).

    I use the export for web feature a lot.  I find that I have to bounce back and forth between Quicktime 7 and X because sometime this feature will work and sometimes it doesn't.  There's no consistent reason I can figure out why the applications will or will not work properly.  On some occasions I get some small 8Kb file.  On other occasions, I only get the audio.
    Any ideas?

    Uhh, the system requirements for Photoshop CC state you need 2 GB RAM, 8 GB recommended. This is likely your problem.
    Benjamin

Maybe you are looking for