House-Bank Only Main Bank account required

Dear Expert,
One of our client wants only main Bank account in house bank defination to see availbal balance. They dont want clearing account(receipt Clearing & Payment clearing) in house bank. but they also want Manual Bank reconcilltion in system. Please help me this out.
Regds,
PK

Hi
this forum is for PRoduction planning.
you need to post this in FICO forum.
reg
dsk

Similar Messages

  • Business Area is not getting updated in "Main Bank Account" Line item (FF_5

    Hi Gurus,
    I am executing T Code: FF_5 for uploading the "Multi-Cash" Format. This transaction clears the Bank Clearing Account and post the entry to the credit of "Bank Main Account".
    Now while i had executed F110, the Business area was properly captured in the Bank Clearing Account Line item. But while executing FF_5, the Business Area is not getting captured against the "Main Bank Account" Line item.
    Can you please tell me how to capture the Business Area against the "Main Bank Account" Line item.
    Rgds,
    Prasad.

    Hi,
    1. In case of Business where payments are made centrally it is important to report
        Bank A/c Business area wise.
    2. However I have solved the problem by doing "Sustitution", and its working fine. The Business Area is getting updated against the Main Bank Account Line item.
    3. I am however getting one error while doing the upload in FF_5. The error occurs
       only if Business Area is a "required" field in Bank Account's "Field Status
       Group".
       Error: (00 298) Formatting error in the field COBL-GSBER ; see next message.
       But if I make Business Area as an Optional Field I am not getting an error and
       also the posting is done to Main Bank Account.
    Is there anyother method by which this error can be corrected.
    I have assigned 2 points for your inputs. Can you help me to solve this error as well.
    Rgds
    Prasad

  • House bank with multiple banks account ids - f-58 paymt+check -check lot NA

    I have a House bank (Indian Bank ) with three bank acccounts under that House bank.
    I have created house bank as " INDBK"
    and I also created account ids :
                Current account 7509 - Account id is " 1000"
                 (ii) Staff salary account - 8141 - Account id is "1100"
    In OBZ5 , Iam able to save only one of account ids with House bank " INDBK"
    i.e.,
    Either  INDBK with Account id 1000 - in which case Iam able to do f-58 payment transaction
    OR
    INDBK with account id 1100 - in such case Iam able to do f-58 payment transaction
    Iam able to do EITHR of the above .When I tried to save both account ids with same house
    both an error message is displayed - " duplication entry "
    Pls adivse how can all accounts under a house bank can be configured for F-58 pymnt+check.
    Looking forward for your help.

    HI -
    It appears in FBZA you can only assign 1 house bank linked to 1 account ID 1-2-1 relationship.
    Therefore can anyone tell me why this error is triggering in F-58? Check lot not found.
    I have setup the check lots via FCHi, when I try to create the Account ID in FBZA, I get the error below, Can anyone please tell how we can use Other Account IDs via F-58, at the moement we are using for our head-office IBHO would like to use for the above 3 branches - Which has the same house bank but different account ID.
    Target key must be different from source key
    Message no. SV015
    Thanks
    Jay

  • House bank to which bank ledger we have to assign main bank or out bank

    Dear all,
    i have to problem in house bank , when we reconcile to bank account that time our bank in not reconciliation, the In bank a/c is affect  actually entry goes to out bank but is does not  affect .
    Thanks and Regards
    Avdesh

    Hi
    Assign main bank GL to House bank master. Check the account assignment in bank reconciliation configuration against posting rule
    Thank You,

  • Main Bank Account - Post Automatic Tick

    Hi Gurus,
    We are using manual bank statement and i have marked tick on post automatically in main bank account.
    System is not allowing to post entries in FF67. Can you please help with this error?
    Thank you

    Hi,
    Remove Post automatically tick mark in Main Bank account then its working.
    Thanks
    Muthu

  • Revaluation of Foreign Bank GL Accounts (Main & Sub Accounts)

    Dear All,
    Please clarify the Below.
    If Company code currency is INR and Bank Account is maitained in USD for 100101(main bank Acct) , 2 sub Accounts 100102-Incoming Bank Acct and 100103-Out going Bank Acct.( These sub accounts are maintained on open item basis and Main GL account will be on Line item Basis).
    when ever the Incoming and Out going payments are done these Subaccounts are getting posted.How does the revaluation work at period end for these 3 accounts.
    what kind of configuration needs to be done for these accounts in OBA1 settings.
    Generally the bank account balance on the closing is revaluated and if we set the subaccounts in the OBA1 settings (which are managed on open item).
    Suitable Suggestions and Advices are rewarded with points.
    Best Regards
    stephen

    Hi Stefen
    Sub-accounts are Bank clearing accounts. Any clearing account managed on Open item basis are not valuated in FC revaluation, because these accounts are meant for BRS. Hence the main bank account alone are revaluated.
    In OBA1, define exchange rate gain/loss for transaction keys relevant for exchange rate like KDD, KDF, etc.
    Before that set up valuation methods also for revaluation and define the exchange rate for the relevant foreign currency/local currency.
    Hope this is useful
    S Jayaram

  • Sub Bank accounts mapping with main Bank account

    Bank accounts
    Hi
    How can we will map with main bank account to sub bank accounts.
    Example; My main bank account: 1111, and
                              Sub bank account :  2222 ( Deposit account)
                              Sub bank account: 3333 (Cheque issue account)
    Regards
    PVC

    Hi
    Bank account-  This is the G/L account that you provide at the Housebank level configuration in FBZP.
    Sub account - This is the G/L account which you provide in the Bank Determination level in FBZP
    Now conceptually there are many transactions which need to be routed through clearing accounts. This is where the sub accounts come handy and are used for clearing purposes. they are open item managed accounts. So clearing is possible. In the end the main bank account tallies with your bank balance and moreover the clearing accounts become zero after all clearing has happened.
    Moreover the best way to maintain the G/L in SAP would be
    XXXX0 as the Main account
    XXXX1 say outgoing checks
    XXXX2 say outgoing wires
    Hope this clarifies
    Rgds

  • Where sub account and main bank account will be effected

    dec 1st 2010 opening balance was 100,000, in main and sub account, dec 31st closed balance is 50,000 there , that means some invoices was happen. where it will be the affected this sub accout and main bank account

    Hi
    The key issue here is when Automatic Bank transfers take place, the salary transfers should be paid to the correct bank account for each employee. The unique identifier is the bank key + bank account number. Therefore, if you have  300000 employees and each employee has an account ina  a different bank, you have no option but to create 300000 bank keys in the database.
    Conflicts may very well arise if you assign arbitrary bank keys and if employees dont get paid in time because the amount went into a wrong bank account, you may well run into industrial relations issues.
    In the UK, US etc, there is a central database of bank keys which is available as a commercial product and most companies purchase this in DVD format and upload the whole thing in the bank tables in FI. on an ongoing basis, if new branches crop up, they are manually updated from time to time.
    Some posssible sources:-
    1) Check if you can get a similar product in India, There used to be websites like indiainfoline.com which could provide this information for a fee.
    2) Surely your FI department would have a list, as they must have been paying employees through Bank transfer before SAP was implemented.
    3) The existing HR system surely must have a list of employees bank accounts along with Bank keys.
    Bottom line, don't assume what the bank keys can be - try and ensure the correct bank key is used for each employee.

  • Is it legal for a bank to reopen an account???

    UncleB wrote:
    asheltonphoto2 wrote:
    Wow, thank you. really doesn't seem like a kosher practice. I spoke with a rep who directed me to some very vague wording in regard to this. Vague or not, it is there in the deposit agreement.  Oh well, drop in the bucket, I suppose. Yeah, this practice goes way, way back. I closed an account with a regional bank in the mid 2000s, and I was concerned of something like this happening as well.  As I was closing the account, I told the person at the branch my account number "might" have been compromised - hey, you never know - and I needed to be sure there was no way the account could "come back to life".  They claimed they did a 'hard-close' (or something like that) but I'll never know if it made a difference.  I had them flag the debit card as 'lost' in their system as well, just in case. It's been a while since I closed any bank accounts, but the last time I left the old account open for an extended amount of time with a small balance, just in case of any situations like this.  I can understand this option isn't ideal for everyone, though.  I will agree it seems this practice is flawed, and I can also see how it could be easily abused.  If you wanted to 'throw a wrench' into someone's financial life, just make a small ($5) cash deposit into an account you know to be closed, and watch the fees add up (most accounts have monthly fees without direct deposit or minimum balances).  Ugh.Hmm, that's strange, I always assumed when you closed a bank account it was dead and couldn't come back to life on its own. In the summer of 2010 I was heading toward filing BK7, had already retained and PIF the attorney. He advised me to close my bank account and open a new one at a bank none of my creditors knew about, to "avoid potential problems". That was Wells Fargo, I closed it in early June. By July CC companies were calling like mad and Chase was the worst, they used a call center in India that spoofed their caller ID so I couldn't always who it was. It was always the same when I answered one of their calls, the person would ask my permission to charge my bank account of record - Wells Fargo - for the past due amount. I'd tell them "No, that account is closed and I don't have any money to make any payment". Well, what do you expect when you outsource collections to a third world country? At least 4 reps must have claimed I told them "Sure, go right ahead" as I got at least 4 returned item mailings from WF in July & Aug, all attempts by Chase to debit the account for a payment. WF never charged me any fees and the notices always showed the account as closed. I guess it's up to the T&C, but I would think WF would have the T&C as much to their favor as possible.

    DaveInAZ wrote:
    UncleB wrote:
    asheltonphoto2 wrote:
    Wow, thank you. really doesn't seem like a kosher practice. I spoke with a rep who directed me to some very vague wording in regard to this. Vague or not, it is there in the deposit agreement.  Oh well, drop in the bucket, I suppose. Yeah, this practice goes way, way back. I closed an account with a regional bank in the mid 2000s, and I was concerned of something like this happening as well.  As I was closing the account, I told the person at the branch my account number "might" have been compromised - hey, you never know - and I needed to be sure there was no way the account could "come back to life".  They claimed they did a 'hard-close' (or something like that) but I'll never know if it made a difference.  I had them flag the debit card as 'lost' in their system as well, just in case. It's been a while since I closed any bank accounts, but the last time I left the old account open for an extended amount of time with a small balance, just in case of any situations like this.  I can understand this option isn't ideal for everyone, though.  I will agree it seems this practice is flawed, and I can also see how it could be easily abused.  If you wanted to 'throw a wrench' into someone's financial life, just make a small ($5) cash deposit into an account you know to be closed, and watch the fees add up (most accounts have monthly fees without direct deposit or minimum balances).  Ugh.Hmm, that's strange, I always assumed when you closed a bank account it was dead and couldn't come back to life on its own. In the summer of 2010 I was heading toward filing BK7, had already retained and PIF the attorney. He advised me to close my bank account and open a new one at a bank none of my creditors knew about, to "avoid potential problems". That was Wells Fargo, I closed it in early June. By July CC companies were calling like mad and Chase was the worst, they used a call center in India that spoofed their caller ID so I couldn't always who it was. It was always the same when I answered one of their calls, the person would ask my permission to charge my bank account of record - Wells Fargo - for the past due amount. I'd tell them "No, that account is closed and I don't have any money to make any payment". Well, what do you expect when you outsource collections to a third world country? At least 4 reps must have claimed I told them "Sure, go right ahead" as I got at least 4 returned item mailings from WF in July & Aug, all attempts by Chase to debit the account for a payment. WF never charged me any fees and the notices always showed the account as closed. I guess it's up to the T&C, but I would think WF would have the T&C as much to their favor as possible.I feel your pain... I had to close a checking account back in 2000 for the same reason; I had a credit card with the same bank that I was IIBK, and the attorney told me since it was the same bank they could possibly go after my checking to pay the credit account.  As for accounts 'coming back to life', it seems the problem usually comes up when there's a deposit of some type into a closed account, then monthly fees start being assessed without the account owner being aware the account is even reopened.  Also, at the bank I used a few years back their debit cards were handled by their credit card dept., who were even in a different city from the main bank office.  I found out "the hard way" there seemed to be a disconnect between the two, and it was not only possible for a debit card to be approved with no money in an account, they were clear at the local branch that this was quite profitable for the bank (OD charges).  Of course the law has changed and this now requires 'opting in', but to make sure there's no problem I simply report the card lost before closing the account.  That seems to prompt them to put an immediate 'stop' to any further authorizations in case there is a delay in closing the card.  An ounce of prevention truly is better than a pound of cure. 

  • 1 House Bank with 2 Bank Keys?

    Hi all,
    I am once again opening the same question....
    Can we have 2 Bank keys with 1 house bank?
    RK
    As the Moderator has closed the message. I am asking why? The 1 line question is not so easy ok. Please let me know the how can we assign 2 bank keys for only 1 house bank. This is the Client requirement. Bank Of America has 2 bank keys and they want only 1 house bank only.
    Please answer the above question.
    Moderator: Please, don't close question.
    Moderator: As before, please avoid asking basic questions. This is basic understanding of bank definition in SAP. Please, read help.sap.com before posting

    Hi Murali/VIvek,
    Thanks for the reply.....
    Yes, I know that it can't be created but the client requirement is they want 2 Bank keys under 1 House bank only.
    Is there any way to have this requirement to be fulfilled?
    RK

  • Bank Reconciliation - Picking wrong accounts

    Dear All,
    I have configured manual bank reconciliation for our house banks as follows,
    GL Codes     Description      Symbols     Acc Mod     Curr     GL Acc          Acc Symbol Desc
    102310      Bank ACC 01 - Main                          LK00     ++++++++++++ Main
    102311      Bank ACC 01 - Incoming Payments     LK01     +++++++++++1 Receipts
    102312      Bank ACC 01 - Cheque Payable     LK02     +++++++++++2 Payments - Cheques
    102313      Bank ACC 01 - Bank Draft (Foreign)     LK03     +++++++++++3 Bank Draft
    102314      Bank ACC 01 - Bank Transfers (Dm)     LK04     +++++++++++4 Bank Transfers
    102315      Bank ACC 02 - Main                          LK05     +++++++++++5  Main
    102316      Bank ACC 02 - Incoming Payments     LK06     +++++++++++6 Receipts
    102317      Bank ACC 02 - Cheque Payable     LK07     +++++++++++7 Payments - Cheques
    102318      Bank ACC 02 - Bank Draft (Foreign)     LK08     +++++++++++8 Bank Draft
    102319      Bank ACC 02 - Bank Transfers (Dm)     LK09     +++++++++++9 Bank Transfers
    When process using Tcode ff67, LK00-LK04 range is working fine but LK05-LK09 range is picking wrong accounts (ie. It picks from LK00-LK04) range.
    Any idea to come across above error ? Appreciate your help on this.
    Thanks
    Madhawa

    Thanks for your reply.
    I have 8 house banks and GL codes created as follows,
    102310      Bank ACC 01 - Main
    102311      Bank ACC 01 - Incoming Payments
    102312      Bank ACC 01 - Cheque Payable
    102313      Bank ACC 01 - Bank Draft (Foreign)
    102314      Bank ACC 01 - Bank Transfers (Domestic)
    102315      Bank ACC 02 - Main
    102316      Bank ACC 02 - Incoming Payments
    102317      Bank ACC 02 - Cheque Payable
    102318      Bank ACC 02 - Bank Draft (Foreign)
    102319      Bank ACC 02 - Bank Transfers (Domestic)
    Iif I create GL accounts keeping with 10 (Main + 9 clearing accounts) will be ok. But I need keeping with 5 accounts (Main + 4 clearing accounts for each house bank).
    As suggested, if I keep GL accounts codes instead of mask, is it recomended to keep ?
    Thanks

  • FBZP bank determination - restricting multiple accounts

    Hi Experts,
    Would anyone know why SAP is limiting the number of Account IDs that can be maintained per House Bank in FBZP - Bank Determination - Bank Accounts?
    i.e.
    Payment Method: C
    Currency: PHP
    House Bank: XXX1
    Account IDs:
    CA01
    CA02
    CA03
    FBZP only allows the following entries:
    XXX1     C     ____     CA01     110123
    XXX1     C     PHP     CA02     110124
    SAP is not allowing more than 2 entries with the same HouseBank and PM.
    I don't see any risk of allowing the maintenance of multiple entries and I am wondering why this restriction is put up by SAP at all.. Could someone please enlighten me?
    Thanks

    Hello David,
    You can maintain bank detials with more than two bank IDs but currency should be different.
    System will not allow to maintain even more than one ID if currency will be same.
    Now the question is why system will not allow more than one IDs if the currency is same.
    In Ranking Order you have to maintain,
    Payment method, currency, Ranking order and house bank.
    Now suppose you enter payment method C for currency PHP keeping ranking order 1 for house bank XXX1 which is having account IDs CA01, CA02 and CA03.
    If you will maintain two IDs or more than two IDs for payment method C currency PHP and house bank XXX1 in Bank details, in this case system will not be able to decide the account ID to post due to having the same payment method, currency and house bank.
    Hence, SAP does not allow to maintain more than one ID for same payment method and same currency.
    Regards,
    Mohammed Kalim

  • Bank Gurantee Process for Account Payble in SAP

    Dear Support,
       We have a requirement to Implement the Bank Gurantee Process for Account Payble in SAP, So please provide any usefull link or process map document in SAP , means how to implement BG process and what will be the transaction and process Mannual document , so that we can  able to implement with the help of those document.
    Regards'
    MK

    this is not forseen In the standard foreign trade part
    Bank guarantees  fuctionality is only defined to secure accounts receivables .
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp60_sp/helpdata/en/93/744947546011d1a7020000e829fd11/frameset.htm

  • Bank reconcilation ff67: bank account change

    Hello
    I have one question can some body help me out in that. we have some company code in those company code we have different bank account but at the time of creation In bank master we did one mistake and assigned one account in two company and after that we did reconciliation process through ff67 now if we are going to change the bank account is it going to make some difference when one company code reconciliation is done.
    It is allowing me to change but I just want to  were it is going to give impact and what will be the implication after changing bank account.
    Thanks
    Ashish

    FF67 is used in the case of manual bank data upload. The bank sends u a statement and user manually enters the data in the FF67 screen. When u enter the bank details the opening balance directly comes from the main GL attached to the bank.
    When all the postings are entered in the subsequent screen, the closing balce will be calculated.
    The FF67 gives u the exact cash position available at the main bank account. The closing balance shld match the Main bank GL in all cases...

  • Main Bank for Offcycle Payments

    Hi Friends
    How can we define the payment methods for Main Bank for normal payroll and Main Bank for offcycle payroll.
    I hope defining the payment method is defined by FI team, but how can we link to the Main Bank for offcycle payroll.
    Kindly advise.

    Hello Surya,
    IT0009 subtype "0" Main bank is always used by RPCALCU0 (Payroll driver)l. You can explicitly use subtype "5" Bank details for off cycle. This is how it works:
    Off cycle workbench is by default designed for a check. Let's say if you're planning to run bonus payments for 100 employees. Their subtype "0" is ACH or Bank transfer but bonus payment required to be paid as a check. Then you can set up IT0009 subtype "5" as a check for these 100 employees and run them thru together with RPCALCU0 as a bonus which in turn after Pre-DME generates check.
    Arti

Maybe you are looking for