How to reduce dso activation time

hi
can any body explain me how to reduce dso activation time.I am having a dso with 5 crore records and it is taking 7 to 8 hrs for activation.

Hi,
Try this.
T.code RSCUSTA2 . Here you can change the no.of records and no.of processes to use for activation job with this you can increase your ODS activation process, here the no.of processes can be increased based on no.of processes available in your server, check in SM50 or SM51.
ODS Query Performance
Thanks,
JituK

Similar Messages

How to reduce smartform activation time

Hi, All
i create a new smartform and just activate without filling any value in form , smartfrom activated within 1 second properly
now again when i activate same smartform it take nearly 20-30 minutes for activation .
Does anyone know how to reduce this activation time of smartform

Hello,
strange problem.
I think you have contact your basis collegues and maybe is helpful to look this transaction : STATTRACE
Regards
roberto

How to improve the activation time for a standard DSO

Hi all,
I'm facing an issue related to the activation of a DSO. The SM37 log is as follows....
12:03:16 Job started
12:03:16 Step 001 started (program RSPROCESS, variant &0000000006946, user ID BWREMOTE)
12:03:20 Attivazione is running: Data target ZFIZIASA, from 93,627 to 93,627
12:18:00 Overlapping check with archived data areas for InfoProvider ZFIZIASA
12:18:00 Data to be activated successfully checked against archiving objects
12:18:02 Status transition 2 / 2 to 7 / 7 completed successfully
12:18:13 Program RSBATCH_EXECUTE_PROZESS successfully scheduled as job BIBCTL_4IC45QJA588GKZ0M7JEJ3HCAR with ID 1218130
12:18:19 Program RSBATCH_EXECUTE_PROZESS successfully scheduled as job BIBCTL_4IC45QJA588GKZ0M7JEJ3HCAR with ID 1218190
12:18:20 Parallel processes (for Attivazione); 000003
12:18:20 Timeout for parallel process (for Attivazione): 000300
12:18:20 Package size (for Attivazione): 020000
12:18:20 Task handling (for Attivazione): Processi batch
12:18:20 Server group (for Attivazione): Nessun gruppo di server config
12:18:20 Activation started (process is running under user BWREMOTE)
12:18:20 Not all data fields were updated in mode "overwrite"
12:18:20 Process started
12:18:20 Process completed
12:18:20 Activation ended
Please have a look into the bold 3rd & 4th line. I couldnt able to analyse where the issue is and what to do to minimize the time for activation.
It is very challenging, please reply!
Please help.
Thanks in adv.
Ajay

Hi Kundan,
Thanks for the response!
Actually, I have two identical DSO, having all the char & KF same and feeding the data from same DS at the same time but the issue is...
1) For 1st DSO, Activation log....
01.07.2010 02:02:41 Job started
01.07.2010 02:02:41 Step 001 started (program RSPROCESS, variant &0000000006946, user ID BWREMOTE)
01.07.2010 02:02:46 Attivazione is running: Data target ZFIZIASA, from 93,751 to 93,751
01.07.2010 02:19:27 Overlapping check with archived data areas for InfoProvider ZFIZIASA
01.07.2010 02:19:27 Data to be activated successfully checked against archiving objects
01.07.2010 02:19:27 Status transition 2 / 2 to 7 / 7 completed successfully
01.07.2010 02:19:28 Program RSBATCH_EXECUTE_PROZESS successfully scheduled as job BIBCTL_4ICC6UMXYT00Z2DYOQV8QL8CJ with ID 021
01.07.2010 02:19:30 Parallel processes (for Attivazione); 000003
01.07.2010 02:19:30 Timeout for parallel process (for Attivazione): 000600
01.07.2010 02:19:30 Package size (for Attivazione): 020000
01.07.2010 02:19:30 Task handling (for Attivazione): Processi batch
01.07.2010 02:19:30 Server group (for Attivazione): Nessun gruppo di server config
01.07.2010 02:19:30 Activation started (process is running under user BWREMOTE)
01.07.2010 02:19:30 Not all data fields were updated in mode "overwrite"
01.07.2010 02:19:30 Activation ended
2) For 2nd DSO, the activation log is..
01.07.2010 02:01:13 Job started
01.07.2010 02:01:13 Step 001 started (program RSPROCESS, variant &0000000006947, user ID BWREMOTE)
01.07.2010 02:01:35 Attivazione is running: Data target ZFIGL_02, from 93,749 to 93,749
01.07.2010 02:01:43 Overlapping check with archived data areas for InfoProvider ZFIGL_02
01.07.2010 02:01:43 Data to be activated successfully checked against archiving objects
01.07.2010 02:01:53 Program RSBATCH_EXECUTE_PROZESS successfully scheduled as job BIBCTL_4ICCAR91ALHE1VHSB6GV9PAPV with ID 02015300
01.07.2010 02:01:54 Program RSBATCH_EXECUTE_PROZESS successfully scheduled as job BIBCTL_4ICCAR91ALHE1VHSB6GV9PAPV with ID 02015400
01.07.2010 02:01:56 Program RSBATCH_EXECUTE_PROZESS successfully scheduled as job BIBCTL_4ICCAR91ALHE1VHSB6GV9PAPV with ID 02015600
Now my client is asking to lower the activation time for 1st one as it is taking for 2nd one.
I'm toatally blank now that what & how to do it!
The volume of data ...
ZFIZIASA
Active table - Number of entries: 13.960.508
Change Log Table - Number of entries: 13.976.530
ZFIGL_02
Active Table - Number of entries: 21.923.947
Change Log table - Number of entries: 21.938.657
Thanks,
ajay
Edited by: sap.ajaykumar on Jul 6, 2010 1:47 PM

How to reduce Oracle Cluster Time Synchronization time to 0

Hi Guys,
How to reduce Offset (in msec) of Oracle Cluster Time Synchronization time to 0 ???
is there any command or is it the only solution to wait to become 0 slowly...
[root@caslive bin]# ./crsctl check ctss
CRS-4701: The Cluster Time Synchronization Service is in Active mode.
CRS-4702: Offset (in msec): -1300
regards,
manish
Email ID: [email protected]

Hi,
1.From DB02--> detail analysis menu you can take out top 50 tables & indexes. you can mark the size of the index should be generally less than the table.If its more or very much similar size of table, you can rebuild it using SE14. This can free some space.
or else you may use brspace to do this.
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw70/helpdata/EN/58/6bec38c9fa7e44b7f2163905863575/frameset.htm
In case of table this option is risky as it may result in data loss.
2. Earlywatch alert gives the top 20 degenrated index. you can check that which also gives a factor 'storage quality'.
3. Run report SAP_DROP_TMPTABLES. It removes temporary database objects. ( we do this in our BW system)
Hope this helps
Thanks
Sushil

How to reduce the fetch time of this sql?

Here is the SQL, three-table join and joining conditions are:
ms_ets_cntrl.ims_cntrt_oid=ims_alctn.ims_alctn_oid
ims_alctn.ims_trde_oid=ims_trde.ims_trde_oid
SELECT 'MCH' Type, ims_ets_cntrl.STTS tp_stts, count(*) Count FROM ims_ets_cntrl where ims_ets_cntrl.ims_cntrt_oid in
(select ims_alctn.ims_alctn_oid FROM ims_alctn, ( select ims_trde.ims_trde_oid from ims_trde
where ( IMS_TRDE.IMS_TRDE_RCPT_DTTM >= TO_DATE('10/29/2009 00:00', 'MM/DD/YYYY HH24:MI') AND IMS_TRDE.IMS_TRDE_RCPT_DTTM <= (TO_DATE('11/5/2009 23:59', 'MM/DD/YYYY HH24:MI')) )
AND (IMS_TRDE.GRS_TRX_TYPE IN ('INJECTION','WITHDRAWAL','PAYMENT') OR IMS_TRDE.SSC_INVST_TYPE = 'FC' AND 1=1 and IMS_TRDE.SERVICE_TYPE='FS' )) TRDE
where IMS_ALCTN.IMS_TRDE_OID=TRDE.IMS_TRDE_OID) and ims_ets_cntrl.outbnd_dest = 'ETD' group by ims_ets_cntrl.STTSOptimizer and related parameter info:
SQL> show parameter optimizer
NAME                                 TYPE        VALUE
optimizer_dynamic_sampling           integer     1
optimizer_features_enable            string      9.2.0
optimizer_index_caching              integer     0
optimizer_index_cost_adj             integer     100
optimizer_max_permutations           integer     2000
optimizer_mode                       string      CHOOSE
SQL>select pname, pval1, pval2 from sys.aux_stats$ where sname='SYSSTATS_INFO';
DSTART          11-16-2009 10:23
DSTOP          11-16-2009 10:23
FLAGS     1
STATUS          NOWORKLOADHere is autotrace output:
Execution Plan
   0      SELECT STATEMENT Optimizer=CHOOSE
   1    0   SORT (GROUP BY)
   2    1     VIEW
   3    2       SORT (UNIQUE)
   4    3         TABLE ACCESS (BY INDEX ROWID) OF 'IMS_ETS_CNTRL'
   5    4           NESTED LOOPS
   6    5             NESTED LOOPS
   7    6               TABLE ACCESS (BY INDEX ROWID) OF 'IMS_TRDE'
   8    7                 INDEX (RANGE SCAN) OF 'IMS_TRDE_INDX4' (NON- UNIQUE)
   9    6               TABLE ACCESS (BY INDEX ROWID) OF 'IMS_ALCTN'
10    9                 INDEX (RANGE SCAN) OF 'IMS_ALCTN_INDX1' (NON -UNIQUE)
11    5             INDEX (RANGE SCAN) OF 'IMS_ETS_CNTRL_INDX1' (NON -UNIQUE)
Statistics
          0 recursive calls
          0 db block gets
     244608 consistent gets
      58856 physical reads
          0 redo size
        497 bytes sent via SQL*Net to client
        499 bytes received via SQL*Net from client
          2 SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client
          2 sorts (memory)
          0 sorts (disk)
          1 rows processedHere is TKPROF output:
call     count       cpu    elapsed       disk      query    current        rows
Parse        1      0.00       0.00          0          0          0           0
Execute      1      0.00       0.00          0          0          0           0
Fetch        2      4.85     129.72      53863     244608          0           1
total        4      4.85     129.72      53863     244608          0           1
Misses in library cache during parse: 1
Optimizer goal: CHOOSE
Parsing user id: 63
Rows     Row Source Operation
      1 SORT GROUP BY
12972   VIEW
12972    SORT UNIQUE
12972     TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID IMS_ETS_CNTRL
46236      NESTED LOOPS
19134       NESTED LOOPS
19744        TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID IMS_TRDE
176922         INDEX RANGE SCAN IMS_TRDE_INDX4 (object id 34099)
19134        TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID IMS_ALCTN
19134         INDEX RANGE SCAN IMS_ALCTN_INDX1 (object id 34094)
27101       INDEX RANGE SCAN IMS_ETS_CNTRL_INDX1 (object id 34101)
********************************************************************************Explain plan output:
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
| Id | Operation                         | Name                | Rows | Bytes | Cost |
|   0 | SELECT STATEMENT                  |                      |       |       |       |
|   1 | SORT GROUP BY                    |                      |       |       |       |
|   2 |   VIEW                            |                      |       |       |       |
|   3 |    SORT UNIQUE                    |                      |       |       |       |
|* 4 |     TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID   | IMS_ETS_CNTRL        |       |       |       |
|   5 |      NESTED LOOPS                 |                      |       |       |       |
|   6 |       NESTED LOOPS                |                      |       |       |       |
|* 7 |        TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| IMS_TRDE             |       |       |       |
|* 8 |         INDEX RANGE SCAN          | IMS_TRDE_INDX4       |       |       |       |
|   9 |        TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| IMS_ALCTN            |       |       |       |
|* 10 |         INDEX RANGE SCAN          | IMS_ALCTN_INDX1      |       |       |       |
|* 11 |       INDEX RANGE SCAN            | IMS_ETS_CNTRL_INDX1 |       |       |       |
Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
   4 - filter("IMS_ETS_CNTRL"."OUTBND_DEST"='ETD')
   7 - filter("IMS_TRDE"."GRS_TRX_TYPE"='INJECTION' OR "IMS_TRDE"."GRS_TRX_TYPE"='WITHD
              RAWAL' OR "IMS_TRDE"."GRS_TRX_TYPE"='PAYMENT' OR "IMS_TRDE"."SSC_INVST_TY
              PE"='FC' AND "IMS_TRDE"."SERVICE_TYPE"='FS')
   8 - access("IMS_TRDE"."IMS_TRDE_RCPT_DTTM">=TO_DATE('2009-10-29 00:00:00', 'yyyy-mm-
              dd hh24:mi:ss') AND "IMS_TRDE"."IMS_TRDE_RCPT_DTTM"<=TO_DATE('2009-11-05
              23:59:00', 'yyyy-mm-dd hh24:mi:ss')
10 - access("IMS_ALCTN"."IMS_TRDE_OID"="IMS_TRDE"."IMS_TRDE_OID")
11 - access("IMS_ETS_CNTRL"."IMS_CNTRT_OID"="IMS_ALCTN"."IMS_ALCTN_OID")
Note: rule based optimizationCould you please help tune this sql?
How can I reduce the elapsed time? How can I reduce query read?
If there is any other info that you need, please let me know!
thank you very much!

What exactly is this logic meant to do?
AND    (ims_trde.grs_trx_type IN ('INJECTION', 'WITHDRAWAL', 'PAYMENT')
        OR ims_trde.ssc_invst_type = 'FC'
        AND ims_trde.service_type = 'FS')is that really:
AND    (ims_trde.grs_trx_type IN ('INJECTION', 'WITHDRAWAL', 'PAYMENT')
        OR ims_trde.ssc_invst_type = 'FC')
AND    ims_trde.service_type = 'FS'or is it maybe:
AND   (ims_trde.grs_trx_type IN ('INJECTION', 'WITHDRAWAL', 'PAYMENT')
       OR (ims_trde.ssc_invst_type = 'FC'
           AND ims_trde.service_type = 'FS'))?

How to reduce the cloning time if using cold backup?

Hi,
We are using EBS r12 (12.0.6) with database 10.2.0.3 in Linux Redhat 4 32-bit envoirnment.
Our datbase size is around 480 GB and we are facing the issues to provide the clone to my consultants for meet the target timelines in given time.
(Source:)---- Production Dell R900 Server machine having 32-GB RAM and 8 Quard Core CPU's.
(Target:)---- Clone Dell 2950 Server machine having 16-GB RAM and 4-Quard Core CPU's.
Currectly we are taking cold backup like:
1: Auto shutdown EBS r12 database nighthy at 12:00 AM daily and compress the backup using tar utility in linux. This process takes 6:00 hours aprox:
2: After that we move compressed file to clone machine and then uncompressed it, and this process takes 5:00 hours aprox.
3: And performe standard cloning steps.
Questions:
1: How to reduce time of this backup process?
3: Is there any other way to reduce the cloning process.
2: What type of backup oracle recommended to their customers for this type of process?
Thanks.

1: How to reduce time of this backup process?Without using third party tools, it might be hard to tune the timing of compressing/uncompressing the file.
Have you tried to use scp command? This would help if your network throughput is acceptable.
3: Is there any other way to reduce the cloning process.Since the main issue you have with the copy, then you might copy the files remotely from the source to the target, or using any other storage/backup tools (like file system snapshot).
2: What type of backup oracle recommended to their customers for this type of process?Oracle does not recommend any type of backup as the tools used are not Oracle products.
Thanks,
Hussein

DSO Activation Time - "TIME_OUT"

Hello,
i've added a new InfoObject to an existing DSO.
Then, i saved the DSO and wanted to activate it.
Now to the problem:
The activation time is so long, that the process terminate.
So that we get the runtime error "TIME_OUT".
I ask for your help.
Regards
Marco

Hi Marco,
As you are trying to activate the DSO in front end and it is ending with time out error(This may be your DSO taking long time to activate).
activate using program RSDG_ODSO_ACTIVATE
goto SE38-->give the program name and execute -->give the DSO name -->before you click on execute, in menu bar under execute click on execute in background.
in the next screen give the local printer name and enter.
In the next screen make the job condition as immediate and remove the periodic option and enter.
Now you can see the job in SM37, monitor this job until it's get finished.
Regards,
Venkatesh

How to reduce Post-Processing time in oracle applications R12?

Hi All,
I ran a XMLP concurrent program at 16-APR-2015 11:23:52 . It's completed at 16-APR-2015 11:30:41. So it took 6 minute 49 seconds. I check the query in sql developer, it's executing less than two minutes. When I check the log file of that program shows the following info...
Beginning post-processing of request 22226009 on node DEV at 16-APR-2015 11:24:43.
Post-processing of request 22226009 completed at 16-APR-2015 11:30:41.
So what is the reason?, and how to reduce the time?

HTML is a simple format (Text).
Excel is more complicated and requires more time to generate. The same applies for Word and PDF output.
Maybe the processing power and memory of the server are not high and this does not help generate the output faster.
I have a workaround for you, generate an XML file (which should finish faster) and open it in Excel.

How to reduced instance recovery time

Hello Friends how are you all. I hope you all will be fine. friends I want to reduced the instance recovery time but i don't know which views or parameters which could helpful for me. Please tell me the way how can i reduced the instance recovery time.
Thanks & Best Wishes

Hi,
Reduced instance recovery time
check ur DB size, is it connected many users.
my advice is do not set the reduced instance recovery time, it may be decreased run-time peformance.
the following procedure
-) Frequent checkpoints
-) reduce instance recovery time
-) set FAST_START_MTTR_TARGET parameter
-) size the Online redo log files
-) Implent manual checkpoints
-) reduce log_buffer size
-) Decrease run-time performance

How to reduce iCal event time span?

How do I set default time span of an event to 1 hour in iCal? I'm using Version 5.0.2 (1571) and the current default is set to something like 6 or 8 hours and it's driving me nuts! A related aggravation is that an event can unintentionally end up spanning 2 days! It used to work just fine in previous versions -- why did they "fix" this and how do I make the current version be truly useful like the old version?

Hi,
I guess you are adding events in Month view. From iCal's help file about entering events in Month view.
Add a new event in Month view by double-clicking within the day you want the event to appear. Enter a name and time duration for the event in the event’s title field, and then press Return.
iCal moves the event to the correct time and sets it to the correct duration. For example, you can double-click within a day in Month view, enter “Movie 7-9pm,” and then press Return.
If you don’t enter a time duration, iCal sets the event’s duration to 1 hour.
If you don’t enter any time information, iCal makes the event an all-day event.
Add a start time in the event title to make a timed 1 hour event. The time part of the title is stripped out.
Best wishes
John M

How to reduce project load time?

I am currently working on a large project (25+ Mb, thousands of vis) with something on the order of 100 classes. Opening the project is painfully slow. It usually takes 7-8 minutes. I'd like to figure out a way to reduce the load time.
What is LV's behavior regarding loading project file vis and libraries (lvlib, lvclass, etc.)?
Are all items in the project automatically loaded when the project is opened?
Are items not in the project but used as sub-vis automatically loaded?
Are dynamically linked items not included in the project automatically opened? (I imagine not.)
Are dynamically linked items that are included in the project automatically opened?
Thanks,
Dave

Hello,
I have talked to multiple people about your issue and we honestly believe that you you are experiencing is expected behavior based on the size of the project and number of VIs used. Creating a new project will sometimes help when a project file has a corruption within it. Since you are experiencing the same behavior on multiple computers, any difference in load time will be a function of the speed, RAM, etc. of that particular computer as compared to your machine. In saying that the files are technically loaded, I am saying that their locations are known so that when they are called, they can be loaded into memory as needed. It does not have to load any portion of the VI other than the location on disk. I would not expect either of those methods to reduce your project load time. Switching to dynamic linking only changes the order in which LabVIEW searches for the files. As I stated before, files added to the project are defined by the name and location on the disk. You can think of the project file as an XML file with different pieces of information about the files. If the file cannot be found, it will try to dynamically link the files by searching for them on the disk. When this happens, it goes through a seris of locations where the files might be located. When the project is loaded, it looks for the files that are listed in the project file first. I hope this helps.
-Zach
Certified LabVIEW Developer

How to reduce Data Manager time

Dear all,
I have a query which is showing 120 sec as Data manager time. Pls suggest the steps to reduce the Data manager time for this query.
Thanks

In this link you may find the answer to all related questions:
http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/90080703-4331-2a10-cd98-9c1e95acdea0?quicklink=index&overridelayout=true
Reducing data manager time can be achieved by:
- optimization of data model
- as far as possible: parallization of multi provider access
- Aggreates
Regards
Aban

How to reduce the Logout time in IDM

Hi Everyone,
Help me in Solving the issue.
When i click on the logout button of the end user interface in sun idm, it is taking 20 secs to come back to the login page (login.jsp) which is causing very much delay in the process. I want to reduce this time. Dont know exactly what is the backend process.
Kindly help me if you know any solution for the same.
Thank you in advance.

Srikanth,
It would be better to use a database table(s) to store your audit trail information than an xml file, which could grow beyond a manageable size and then require housekeeping efforts and file rolling, etc. It would also be much easier to query user related information out of the logs, pareto charts for failed vs. successful login attempts, etc. if the data was stored in a database.
Have you considered modifying the Relogin.jsp page link in the portal's sub-menu bar? How about making your own version of this web page and changing the link pointer? Keep in mind that whatever result you come up with here will need a significant update for NetWeaver UME compatibility in version 12.0.
Regards,
Jeremy

How to reduce long extraction time - Generic extractor based on view

Hello. The previous thread about this error was closed without any answer.
I'm in the same configuration.
"Using a generic extractor (Delta enabled on confirmation date) based on view to load data from ECC6 to BI.
Now my issue is that the delta extraction is running for a long time (around 1 hr) even if the data volume is very small
While checking the job overview in source system i saw that the job is hanging at the below step for almost 1 hr."
1 LUWs confirmed and 1 LUWs to be deleted with function module MF RSC2_QOUT_CONFIRM_DATA.
I am not understanding why this is happening.
Here is the log of the job:
30.05.2011 03:58:11 Job started
30.05.2011 03:58:11 Step 001 started (program SBIE0001, variant &0000000166864, user ID ALEREMOTE)
30.05.2011 03:58:11 Asynchronous transmission of info IDoc 2 in task 0001 (0 parallel tasks)
30.05.2011 03:58:11 DATASOURCE = 0CO_OM_WBS_6
30.05.2011 03:58:11 *************************************************************************
30.05.2011 03:58:11 *          Current Values for Selected Profile Parameters               *
30.05.2011 03:58:11 *************************************************************************
30.05.2011 03:58:11 * abap/heap_area_nondia......... 4000000000                              *
30.05.2011 03:58:11 * abap/heap_area_total.......... 8000000000                              *
30.05.2011 03:58:11 * abap/heaplimit................ 100000000                               *
30.05.2011 03:58:11 * zcsa/installed_languages...... DEFS                                    *
30.05.2011 03:58:11 * zcsa/system_language.......... E                                       *
30.05.2011 03:58:11 * ztta/max_memreq_MB............ 2047                                    *
30.05.2011 03:58:11 * ztta/roll_area................ 6500000                                 *
30.05.2011 03:58:11 * ztta/roll_extension........... 2000000000                              *
30.05.2011 03:58:11 *************************************************************************
30.05.2011 03:58:11 1 LUWs confirmed and 1 LUWs to be deleted with function module RSC2_QOUT_CONFIRM_DATA
30.05.2011 05:02:53 Call customer enhancement BW_BTE_CALL_BW204010_E (BTE) with 171 records
30.05.2011 05:02:53 Result of customer enhancement: 171 records
30.05.2011 05:02:53 Call customer enhancement EXIT_SAPLRSAP_001 (CMOD) with 171 records
30.05.2011 05:02:53 Result of customer enhancement: 171 records
30.05.2011 05:02:53 Asynchronous send of data package 1 in task 0002 (1 parallel tasks)
30.05.2011 05:02:53 IDOC: Info IDoc 2, IDoc No. 4667050, Duration 00:00:00
30.05.2011 05:02:53 IDoc: Start = 30.05.2011 03:58:11, End = 30.05.2011 03:58:11
30.05.2011 05:02:53 tRFC: Data Package = 1, TID = AC11082D38B44DE308DD028A, Duration = 00:00:00, ARFCSTATE = RECORDED
30.05.2011 05:02:53 tRFC: Start = 30.05.2011 05:02:53, End = 30.05.2011 05:02:53
30.05.2011 05:02:53 Altogether, 0 records were filtered out through selection conditions
30.05.2011 05:02:53 Asynchronous transmission of info IDoc 3 in task 0003 (0 parallel tasks)
30.05.2011 05:02:53 IDOC: Info IDoc 3, IDoc No. 4667051, Duration 00:00:00
30.05.2011 05:02:53 IDoc: Start = 30.05.2011 05:02:53, End = 30.05.2011 05:02:53
30.05.2011 05:02:53 Synchronized transmission of info IDoc 4 (0 parallel tasks)
30.05.2011 05:02:53 IDOC: Info IDoc 4, IDoc No. 4667052, Duration 00:00:00
30.05.2011 05:02:53 IDoc: Start = 30.05.2011 05:02:53, End = 30.05.2011 05:02:53
30.05.2011 05:02:53 Job finished
Thanks for your help.
Yann

Parth Kulkarni,
following the note and the other thread, I've check the index 4 of the table COEP.
Here is what I got:
Index ID           COEP             - 4
Short text         MANDT/TIMESTMP/OBJNR, Index for Delta read method (CO-PA)
Last changed       SAP             04.01.2010
Status             Active          Saved
                   Does not exist in the database
DB index nme
    Not defined as DB index in the ABAP Dictionary
Is the fact that it doesn't exist in the database a problem ?
Is the fact that it is active is good enough ?
By the way thanks for your speedy reply !
Yann
Edited by: Yann GOFFIN on May 30, 2011 1:35 PM

Oracle 10g: How to reduce the select * time

Hello,
We have 10 million entries in our database (Oracle 10g in windows 32 bit machine.)
The execution of 'select * ....' takes 3 to 4 hour. Is there any way to reduce this time.
Is any tool available which can read the oracle export data and produce the output in text file format.
or any idea ?
Thanks
With Regards
Hemant.

hem_kec wrote:
Hello EdStevens
Is that 3 to 4 hours scrolling data past your screen?Answer: The Oracle is taking 3-4 hr to produce the output.
OK, let me try again. Where is the output being directed? To the screen? To a file?
The reason I ask is that often people will say "It takes n minutes to run this query" when in fact Oracle is producing the result set in a few seconds and what is taking n minutes is to run the results past the screen.
You should take a statspack report while the query is running and see where it is spending its time.
>
That's a different problem. I assume by "export data" you mean a .dmp file created by exp or expdp? If so what do you hope to achieve by outputting it in text format? What is the business problem to be solved?Answer: Since customer want to read all 10 milion entries. so we are think if we can dump (Oracle export) the data and using some tool (not Oracle) to read the data so there is no wait for the customer.As stated, a dmp file is oracle proprietary binary file that exists solely to transport data across platforms/versions. It is not suitable for your purpose. You are far better off finding where the current query is spending its time than looking for some kludge. 10 million rows of data is still 10 million rows of data. Do you think extracting it from the db, storeing it in some other format, and having some other tool read it off of disk in that format is going to be faster than simply selecting it from the db -- asking the db to do what it was designed to do?
>
>
Thanks
With Regards
Hemant.

How to reduce dso activation time

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for