How to utilize all CPU's ????

Hi Experts,
I'm running a 10g database on a Quad Core server. But when I execute procedures in the database it utilizes only one CPU leaving other CPU's idle.
Is there anyway that I can configure Oracle 10g Database to utilize all CPU's. ???

One session can only run one SQL statement at a time. So, the SQL would be executed serially, and utilize only one CPU, unless the SQL statement utilizes parallel execution and you have enterprise edition.
Generally, multiple CPUs are utilized within Oracle in one of two ways:
1.) You have dozens or hundreds of users, and though each one is executing serially, there are multiple users running concurrently, and each one will run on one of your CPUs.
2.) You have a data warehouse or DSS type system, with very few users and almost no concurrency. In this case, you'll want to have Enterprise Edition, and you'll want to enable Parallel execution. In this case, a query (or DML) comes along, and Oracle's cost based optimizer will consider the specified degree of parallelism, along with the cpu_count, and some other factors, and determine how many parallel slaves to utilize, and each parallel slave will run on a different CPU.
Hope that helps,
-Mark

Similar Messages

  • When ACD 30" monitor gets hot, kernel_task utilizes all CPU on Mac Book Air

    I've been having a problem with my system slowing down due to the system "kernel_task" taking over all available CPU (up to 150% of a CPU on my dual core Mac Book Air). I've figured out some of the parameters of the problem, and it seems related to having the Air hooked up to an external monitor:
    1) It seems to only happen when the Air is attached to an external monitor, which in my case is a 30" Cinema Display (which is through a Mini DisplayPort to Dual-Link DVI Adapter -- not sure if this is relevant)
    2) It only happens when the monitor itself is physically warm to the touch (actually the back gets quite hot).
    3) When the kernel_task takes over, and I unplug the Air from the DVI Adapter, kernel_task usually settles down (to 5 - 10% CPU utilization) within 30 - 60 seconds
    4) If I plug the Air back into the DVI adapter at this point (while the monitor is still warm), kernel_task CPU utilization immediately jumps up to 130 - 150%.
    5) If I wait until the monitor is cool before plugging the Air back into the DVI adapter, kernel_task stays in the normal 2 - 10% CPU utilization range for 30 - 90 minutes and the process starts all over again (at this point the monitor is usually quite warm / hot again)
    Rebooting doesn't seem to help (if the monitor is hot, kernel_task starts hogging the CPU right after booting up).
    Has anyone experienced a similar problem? Any thoughts about possible remedies, or ways to further isolate the problem?
    I appreciate your reading this somewhat bizarre tale of woe.
    Thanks,
    Marc

    After upgrading to 10.5.7 this week my MacBook Air goes into kernel_task spin-mode within minutes even when the machine is idle. There are many discussions about this, the longest of which is here: http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?messageID=9458471&#9458471

  • How do I set up two profiles on my computer but still utilize all programs and files?

    How do I set up two profiles on my computer but still utilize all programs and files?  I want to set up two profiles so my wife and I can utilize two iTunes accounts and different internet settings, but when I set up an administrator profile for her and log in. I don't see all of the stuff that is on the administrator profile (mine) that was created first

    A second user account is separate; with separate preferences and data,  but can share the same apps as long as they're in the top-level Applications folder, not an Applications folder inside another user's home folder.
    Sharing files is a bit different; you can put them in the special Shared user folder, or grant permission to specific files/folders in one account to a different user.

  • Does Adobe Premiere CC utilize all 24 cores of a Xeon CPU while exporting in 4K?

    Hey folks,
    Just wanted to bring this up to you guys regarding processing power on Premier Pro CC. The Xeon E5-2697 v2 is a 12 core CPU that comes with 24 threads and I was wondering if anyone out there utilizes all these cores while exporting in 4K?
    Thanks
    Eber

    Here are the top three PPBM8 scoring for exporting the CPU intensive MPEG2-DVD timeline.
    My heavily overclocked (4.5 GHz) i7-5960X with 8-cores scores at about 279 seconds, this is typical of other i7-5960X based systems which we have 6 other submitted scores ranging from 260 to 286
    Eric at ADK supplied the first and third results showing a significant Premiere improvement in this CPU only export when going from 14 cores to 28 cores.  I hope I got the clock speed correctly, Speccy does not always give the correct clock speeds of the processor unless you run it while the benchmark is running.  Maybe he can comment 
    Jim Short has the second lowest time with his 16 total cores
    This export is AVCHD to DVD export.  The H.264 timeline that we have in PPBM8 that includes some 4K media does not show such a large variation versus cores, but this may be due to the fact that that export is GPU assisted.

  • How to find the CPU utilization from the portal front end

    HI Guys,
      I want to find the CPU utilization from the portal front end browser screen.Can you please let me know how to find this and also the path to find it.
    And how to find the CPU utilization from the server.What is the command to find the CPU utilization at unix level.
    Regards,
    Krishnam.

    hi you can create transient field in view object indicate to visibility of row (boolean ) and create view criteria that show only rows that are able to be visible according to transient attribute and at the update process set the attribute to true inside entityImpl class

  • How to remove the cpu usage limit?

    I have to run a C program on terminal as fast as possible. However, there seems to be a cpu usage limit for the terminal, the program supose to run around 15 seconds on a linux machine with similar configuration where cpu usage is at 85-95%. But, it runs one minute on my macbook pro with cpu usage less than 15%. Finally, my question is, how do I utilize all of the 85% idle cpu for this program or at least most of the idle cpu?

    Per se, MacOS X does not impose any CPU usage limits other than those from the processor scheduling priorities. Standard Unix scheduling priorities go from -20 to +20, with the default being 0. If you have administrator privileges, you increase your process' priority (a more negative value) with the nice or renice commands. See their man pages. On a four-core 15" or 17" MBP, even setting max -20 priority should not impact the rest of the system too much.
    You may also want to go over and discuss these things in the Unix forums:
    https://discussions.apple.com/community/mac_os/mac_os_x_technologies

  • Detail Information about all CPU IN Linux x86_64

    Hi all,
    How to get Detail Information about all CPU in Linux x86_64. Like number of cpu, utilisation, idle

    user13549752 wrote:
    Hi all,
    How to get Detail Information about all CPU in Linux x86_64. Like number of cpu, utilisation, idle$ less /proc/cpuinfo ---cpu information
    $ grep processor /proc/cpuinfo
    $top ---command will show cpu utilization,idle time
    # mpstat
    mpstat -P ALL
    # sar -u 2 5
    refer:-
    http://www.cyberciti.biz/tips/how-do-i-find-out-linux-cpu-utilization.html
    for dba related linux commands refer,
    http://gavinsoorma.com/unix-for-the-dba/
    http://www.oracle-base.com/articles/misc/UNIXForDBAs.php
    http://blogs.oracle.com/myoraclediary/entry/useful_unix_commands_for_dbas

  • How to access all open documents' ReadImageDocumentDesc?

    Hi everyone,
    I want to get access to the ReadImageDocumentDesc for all currently opened documents from an Export plugin, so I can give users the choice which of the documents to export. Is this possible?
    I expected to have access to all documents via the "next" field of "ReadImageDocumentDesc *documentInfo" in form of a linked list, but that field appears ti be always NULL. Or isn't it for certain types of plugins?
    If it isn't possible, are there other tricks I could use to accomplish my goal? Is a stack renderer plugin an option perhaps?
    Any kind of help is highly appreciated.
    Bernd

    I have the same question. When I write a filter plugin in, I try to access two open pictures to deal with both of them. But I can't find how to utilize the ReadImageDocumentDesc * next to finish it. Is it possible?

  • Fully utilizing all CPU's for a LabVIEW application

    Hi All,
    Have any of you figured out how to harness all of the CPU's in modern machines?
    Backgroud:
    I have an application that does a lot of signal processing and it was pegging the CPU of the machine it was originally deployed on for many minutes.
    As a quick first step we suggested the customer try the application on a new high-end machine. THey did and the preformance improved ...
    BUT...
    When we look at the
    Task Manager >>> Perfomance tab
    it appears we are not not utilizing all of the available CPU's.
    This observation is based on the 8 CPU graphs displayed in the Task Manager.
    The first 4 graphs show very heavy CPU useage but the reamining four graphs show little or no loads.
    I am guessing that this may be due to LV (8.X) using a default of 4 threads for each execution system.
    Since the last time we were on-site, I have looked at
    ...\LabVIEW\vi.lib\utility\sysinfo.llb\threadconfig.vi
    and it appears all I have to do is run that utility one time and save the config as 8 threads for each execution system.
    Now before I send someone back to site, I'd like to find out if someone has traveled this road before me and would like to share their wisdom.
    Thank you,
    Ben
    "Mommy, I want to go FAST!" (Daughter of one of my old girl friends)
    Ben Rayner
    I am currently active on.. MainStream Preppers
    Rayner's Ridge is under construction
    Solved!
    Go to Solution.

    I received a couple of questions concerning this post, so a bit more information to clear things up.
    LabVIEW's Logic
    LabVIEW's default thread creation logic is to create the max of (number of cores, 4). The bug we had is that we inadvertently limited this to four (no humorous comments please ).
    What does the utility do?
    The utility writes some settings to your ini file if different than default. When you run the utility, it displays the number of processors you have in a field at the top. It displays the number of threads being used for each priority in a section below. For a machine with 1-4 cores, the default thread count will be four. For a machine with 8 cores, the default thread count "should" be 8 (and, as of LabVIEW 8.5, it is).
    Roy

  • How is utilization index calculated?

    Hi there,
    When I create a dashboard widget, I can select from top highest or top lowest utilization. I am curious how the utilization is calculated? Is it average over all metrics or is there some sampling?
    Thanks,
    -Nigel

    In other words, if I take a 10 mpx file, a 16 mpx file, a 24 mpx file and a 40 mpx file; at 100% zoom they will all display 1,680 x 1,050 pixels of that file?
    Exactly! Lightroom calls it 1:1 instead of 100% but that is a detail.
    So when you are looking at a 10 MP file at 1:1 you see the equivalent of a crop from a 30x20" print, with 16 MP a crop from a 38*25" print, with 24MP, a crop from a 47x31" print and with a 40MP file, a crop from a 60x40" print.
    I do these calculations more often as you might be able to tell ;-)

  • How to utilize index in selection statement

    hi
    how to utilize index in selection statement and how is it reduces performance whether another alternative is there to reduce performance .
    thanks

    Hi Suresh,
    For each SQL statement, the database optimizer determines the strategy for accessing data records. Access can be with database indexes (index access), or without database indexes (full table scan).The cost-based database optimizer determines the access strategy on the basis of:
    *Conditions in the WHERE clause of the SQL statement
    *Database indexes of the table(s) affected
    *Selectivity of the table fields contained in the database indexes
    *Size of the table(s) affected
    *The table and index statistics supply information about the selectivity of table fields, the selectivity of combinations of table fields, and table size.     Before a database access is performed, the database optimizer cannot calculate the exact cost of a database access. It uses the information described above to estimate the cost of the database access.The optimization calculation is the amount by which the data blocks to be read (logical read accesses) can be reduced. Data blocks show the level of detail in which data is written to the hard disk or read from the hard disk.
    <b>Inroduction to Database Indexes</b>
    When you create a database table in the ABAP Dictionary, you must specify the combination of fields that enable an entry within the table to be clearly identified. Position these fields at the top of the table field list, and define them as key fields.
    After activating the table, an index is created (for Oracle, Informix, DB2) that consists of all key fields. This index is called a primary index. The primary index is unique by definition. As well as the primary index, you can define one or more secondary indexes for a table in the ABAP Dictionary, and create them on the database. Secondary indexes can be unique or non-unique. Index records and table records are organized in data blocks.
    If you dispatch an SQL statement from an ABAP program to the database, the program searches for the data records requested either in the database table itself (full table scan) or by using an index (index unique scan or index range scan). If all fields requested are found in the index using an index scan, the table records do not need to be accessed.
    A data block shows the level of detail in which data is written to the hard disk or read from the hard disk. Data blocks may contain multiple data records, but a single data record may be spread across several data blocks.
    Data blocks can be index blocks or table blocks. The database organizes the index blocks in the form of a multi-level B* tree. There is a single index block at root level, which contains pointers to the index blocks at branch level. The branch blocks contain either some of the index fields and pointers to index blocks at leaf level, or all index fields and a pointer to the table records organized in table blocks. The index blocks at leaf level contain all index fields and pointers to the table records from the table blocks.
    The pointer that identifies one or more table records has a specific name. It is called, for example, ROWID for Oracle databases. The ROWID consists of the number of the database file, the number of the table block, and the row number within the table block.
    The index records are stored in the index tree and sorted according to index field. This enables accelerated access using the index. The table records in the table blocks are not sorted.
    An index should not consist of too many fields. Having a few very selective fields increases the chance of reusability, and reduces the chance of the database optimizer selecting an unsuitable access path.
    <b>Index Unique Scan</b>
    If, for all fields in a unique index (primary index or unique secondary index), WHERE conditions are specified with '=' in the WHERE clause, the database optimizer selects the access strategy index unique scan.
    For the index unique scan access strategy, the database usually needs to read a maximum of four data blocks (three index blocks and one table block) to access the table record.
    <b><i>select * from VVBAK here vbeln = '00123' ......end select.</i></b>
    In the SELECT statement shown above, the table VVBAK is accessed. The fields MANDT and VBELN form the primary key, and are specified with '=' in the WHERE clause. The database optimizer therefore selects the index unique scan access strategy, and only needs to read four data blocks to find the table record requested.
    <b>Index Range Scan</b>
    <b><i>select * from VVBAP here vbeln = '00123' ......end select.</i></b>
    In the example above, not all fields in the primary index of the table VVBAP (key fields MANDT, VBELN, POSNR) are specified with '=' in the WHERE clause. The database optimizer checks a range of index records and deduces the table records from these index records. This access strategy is called an index range scan.
    To execute the SQL statement, the DBMS first reads a root block (1) and a branch block (2). The branch block contains pointers to two leaf blocks (3 and 4). In order to find the index records that fulfill the criteria in the WHERE clause of the SQL statement, the DBMS searches through these leaf blocks sequentially. The index records found point to the table records within the table blocks (5 and 6).
    If index records from different index blocks point to the same table block, this table block must be read more than once. In the example above, an index record from index block 3 and an index record from index block 4 point to table records in table block 5. This table block must therefore be read twice. In total, seven data blocks (four index blocks and three table blocks) are read.
    The index search string is determined by the concatenation of the WHERE conditions for the fields contained in the index. To ensure that as few index blocks as possible are checked, the index search string should be specified starting from the left, without placeholders ('_' or %). Because the index is stored and sorted according to the index fields, a connected range of index records can be checked, and fewer index blocks need to be read.
    All index blocks and table blocks read during an index range scan are stored in the data buffer at the top of a LRU (least recently used) list. This can lead to many other data blocks being forced out of the data buffer. Consequently, more physical read accesses become necessary when other SQL statements are executed
    <b>DB Indexex :Concatenation</b>
         In the concatenation access strategy, one index is reused. Therefore, various index search strings also exist. An index unique scan or an index range scan can be performed for the various index search strings. Duplicate entries in the results set are filtered out when the search results are concatenated.
    <i><b>Select * from vvbap where vbeln in ('00123', '00133', '00134').
    endselect.</b></i>
    In the SQL statement above, a WHERE condition with an IN operation is specified over field VBELN. The fields MANDT and VBELN are shown on the left of the primary index. Various index search strings are created, and an index range scan is performed over the primary index for each index search string. Finally, the result is concatenated.
    <b>Full Table Scan</b>
    <b><i>select * from vvbap where matnr = '00015'.
    endselect</i></b>
    If the database optimizer selects the full table scan access strategy, the table is read sequentially. Index blocks do not need to be read.
    For a full table scan, the read table blocks are added to the end of an LRU list. Therefore, no data blocks are forced out of the data buffer. As a result, in order to process a full table scan, comparatively little memory space is required within the data buffer.
    The full table scan access strategy is very effective if a large part of a table (for example, 5% of all table records) needs to be read. In the example above, a full table scan is more efficient than access using the primary index.
    <i><b>In Brief</b></i>
    <i>Index unique scan:</i> The index selected is unique (primary index or unique secondary index) and fully specified. One or no table record is returned. This type of access is very effective, because a maximum of four data blocks needs to be read.
    <i>Index range scan:</i> The index selected is unique or non-unique. For a non-unique index, this means that not all index fields are specified in the WHERE clause. A range of the index is read and checked. An index range scan may not be as effective as a full table scan. The table records returned can range from none to all.
    <i>Full table scan:</i> The whole table is read sequentially. Each table block is read once. Since no index is used, no index blocks are read. The table records returned can range from none to all.
    <i>Concatenation:</i> An index is used more than once. Various areas of the index are read and checked. To ensure that the application receives each table record only once, the search results are concatenated to eliminate duplicate entries. The table records returned can range from none to all.
    Regards,
    Balaji Reddy G
    ***Rewards if answers are helpful

  • Does FCS 2 utilize all 8 cores

    Hello, I am jumping between two Mac Pros. a 2.66 4-core or a 2.66 8-core. I've been researching quite a bit and it seems that those two configurations seem to be the best options.
    I have FCS 2 and plan on getting CS5. I don't plan on upgrading to FCS 3 so that's why I was looking at the 4-core. I've read that FCS 2 doesn't really utilize all cores. With CS5 I'll mainly be using PS, AE, Illus, Flash, and InD. I'll use all the final cut apps. I am not a professional and still have much to learn with these apps; in fact I'll probably be doing more learning than working. But I would like to future proof myself because if I opt for the 8-core I want it to last for quite awhile. And I am starting to get into graphic design a little more than video.
    Would appreciate your advice.

    What can you afford? What does it cost you while you wait?
    An eight core will be faster in pure rendering (particularly if using virtual clusters) than a 4 core. On the other hand, if it's not making you any money, who cares how long you wait?
    Good luck,
    x

  • SQL Developer occasionally hogs all CPU resources

    Client OS: Windows XP Professional
    Connecting to : Oracle 9.2.0.3 on Sun Solaris server
    I encountered a few instances where SQL Developer hogs all CPU resources on my Windows XP notebook.
    I usually have to kill the SQL Developer process.
    I have noticed this happening occasionally when I :
    1. hit Enter at the SQL Worksheet window
    2. hit F9 at the SQL Worksheet window - the query does not start
    How do I collect a dump or some kind of debug information when the above happens ?
    Who can I send the information to ?

    How do I collect a dump or some kind of debug
    information when the above happens ?Start SQLDeveloper using sqldeveloper.exe in <sqldeveloper>\jdev\bin
    When sqldeveloper starts hogging cpu, go to the console window and type ctrl-break. You should get a thread dump.
    Who can I send the information to ?If you have a support contract, you can raise a TAR, otherwise post the thread dump here.

  • Utilization 100% CPU

    How down the utilization of CPU? It depends the parameters ini?
    Regards

    The size Memory is:
    Physical memory is 1048048
    The virtual memory 1536MB
    Paging 51768
    Not Paging 30548
    SGA Total 377,071MB
    PGA Total 35766KB
    Regards

  • How to get the CPU time of a query?

    Hello all, will someone pls tell me how to get the CPU time instead of Elapsed Time of a query?
    Thanks.

    If i am not wrong, Jonathan Lewis blogged about the changed behaviour.
    Here is short test:
    SQL> CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION Cpu RETURN NUMBER IS
      2    Retval NUMBER;
      3  BEGIN
      4    SELECT m.VALUE
      5    INTO      Retval
      6    FROM      V$statname s, V$mystat m
      7    WHERE  s.Statistic# = m.Statistic#
      8    AND       NAME = 'CPU used by this session';
      9    RETURN Retval;
    10  END;
    11  /
    Function created.
    cat cpu_test.sql
    DECLARE
    TYPE t IS TABLE OF NUMBER;
    tt t;
    BEGIN
    dbms_output.put_line(cpu());
    SELECT COUNT(*) over(PARTITION BY owner) BULK COLLECT INTO tt FROM all_objects;
    dbms_output.put_line(cpu());
    SELECT COUNT(*) over(PARTITION BY object_type) BULK COLLECT INTO tt FROM user_objects;
    dbms_output.put_line(cpu());
    SELECT COUNT(*) over(PARTITION BY owner) BULK COLLECT INTO tt FROM dba_objects;
    dbms_output.put_line(cpu());
    END;
    SQL> select * from v$version
      2  /
    BANNER
    Oracle9i Enterprise Edition Release 9.2.0.6.0 - Production
    PL/SQL Release 9.2.0.6.0 - Production
    CORE    9.2.0.6.0       Production
    TNS for Linux: Version 9.2.0.6.0 - Production
    NLSRTL Version 9.2.0.6.0 - Production
    SQL> @cpu_test
    0
    0
    0
    0
    PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
    SQL> @cpu_test
    106
    106
    106
    106
    PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
    SQL> select * from v$version
      2  /
    BANNER
    Oracle Database 10g Enterprise Edition Release 10.2.0.3.0 - Prod
    PL/SQL Release 10.2.0.3.0 - Production
    CORE    10.2.0.3.0      Production
    TNS for Linux: Version 10.2.0.3.0 - Production
    NLSRTL Version 10.2.0.3.0 - Production
    SQL> set serveroutput on
    SQL> @cpu_test
    1
    129
    130
    145
    PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
    SQL> @cpu_test
    145
    273
    275
    290
    PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.Best regards
    Maxim

Maybe you are looking for