HR - Payroll City Tax

I need to write a report that gives me the amount of city tax (for a particular city) per employee. I have never done any type of payroll/HR reporting so I am not sure where to start. I have been doing some research and I can't find any viable information on payroll [city] tax. Any help would be appreciated. My goal is to model the report around PC00_M10_REC.
Regards,
Davis

Dear Vijay,
i am mohammed.
if MOLGA=40 is not existing then go to T.Code: SU3 in parameters Tab please give in Parameter ID=MOL and Parameter value=40
ans save and leave the transaction and check the system.
Regards,
mohammed
Edited by: 0mohammed1 on Oct 5, 2011 1:35 PM

Similar Messages

UK Payroll new tax code 1000L

Hello Friends:
In UK Payroll new tax code 1000L for year 2014-April 06th. I have updated in Constant table V_T511K effective April 06th 2014 but this code is not going to Ceridian interface(PU12). I would like to know where we need to apply this new tax code?. Is there any OSS Notes?. Any help is appreciated. Thanks in Advance

Hello
Please note that the tax calculation for UK payroll is done based on the tax code as maintained in IT0065 ,.
Also please note the following :-
Code 0T u2013 This code is used cumulatively with no pay adjustment and all pay is taxed according to the relevant rate dependent on the level of earnings
Code BR - This code means that all the employeesu2019 pay is liable to basic rate tax and there is no pay adjustment allowed
Tables T5G01 and T5G02 are then used by payroll for tax calculation.
Hope this helps
Kind Regards
Ramana

How to get the value for the LIT_Withheld field in the city tax form?

I am trying to get the value for the LIT_Withheld field on the city tax form , PAYUSEET.. This is not a database column but is generated based on some conditions.. Appreciate the help. Thanks, Suguna

Hi Abhmanyu,
Thanks for your response.
Search Help Name : ZZ_MG_MARITAL_VH
Selection Method : T502T
Search help parameters are SPRSL, FAMST, FTEXT,
Can u provide me a sample code to fetch the value of corresponding text.
Thanks,
Hari

Self Services-- Payroll & Compensation--- Tax Saving Declarations IND

Hi,
Hope you are doing well,
am using Peopletools 8.52.12
HRMS 9.1 FP2
Sql server 2008R2 on windows server 2008
In PIA: Self Services-->Payroll & Compensation--->Tax Saving Declarations IND page displaying "You do not have privilege to access the Self Service page to sumbit declarations.(17410,78)
Please contact your dministrator for more details"
Can you please help me on this
Thanks
Prasad

You need add this component and page to the permission list. Attach the permission list to a role and then assign that role to the user.
To verify the security of the page, you can either use the SQL query or navigate to the following path
Home > PeopleTools > Portal > Structure and Content
and then go to that page you are looking for. Click on "Edit" appearing besides the page who are looking for and then Go to Security tab.
You will find the list of permission list attached to that page.
Let us know if this helps.

UK Payroll Issue : Tax Adjustment Wage Type E501

Hi,
We are facing an issue when inputting Tax adjustment wage type E501 to adjust previous year's tax retroactively.
When we enter wage type E501 with tax adjustment amount in IT0015 for the period 12 2008 ( March) and run payroll for current period ( May 2009) The remuneration Statement shows weird results.
For example :
For an employee we entered Wagetype E501 with amount +£20.00 with a date of 31/3/09 in May. The pay has been calculated and the tax due to be deducted in May is £568.60. The payslip shows £588.60 (£568.60 + -£20.00) and it also shows £588.60 for a retrospective pay period (*) this figure should not appear at all. Again the payslip does not balance but it would if the correct tax amount of £568.60 only showed on the payslip.
E501 is purely an adjustment to the Year to Date cumulatives it is not a deduction (or refund) to the employee and therefore should not affect the payslip.
UK Payroll gurus please help me sort out this issue.
Thanks & Regards,
Anupama

Hi Surya,
Thanks for the reply.
I have checked and found out that subschema ZNTO ( GNTO) contains ZEOY(GEOY) and this is how it looks. Please let me know if any changes are to be made to the PCR .
ZEOY Adjustment to results table RT
      E101 /101 adjustment
      E112 /112 adjustment
      E121 /121 adjustment
      E501 /501 adjustment
        ADDWTE*    RT   Results table
        ADDWTE/501 RT   Results table
      E505 /505 adjustment
      E506 /506 adjustment
      ECSL /CSL EOY Adjustment
      EP20 /P20 adjustment
      EP21 /P21 adjustment
      ESPY /SPY adjustment
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Anupama

Payroll and Tax

Our customer is a german company with a subsidiary company in Blufton Ohio. The group ist implementing SAP HCM. Going live shall be in July 2006.
Question 1:
Why is it urgently necessary to implement a special tool for US TAX?
Qustion 2:
Is there any experience about cost for impementing PY with best practice (200 persons)?

Hi,
Payroll is run for each and every country using
separate driver Programs.Since each and every country
has its own rules in calculating Pay for the employees.
So also TAX implications. Every country has its own
"acts" fr TAX . Since your customer is in 2 different
locations , they have to calculate PAYROLL&TAX
depending on the country the employees work for.
Regards,
GSR.

City Tax to show up in ESS??

Hello All,
those who are familiar with table T5UTZ, I did create a new Tax Authority NY01 for Newyork City. However for ESS (PM -> ESS -> Personal Data -> Personal Information (ESS) Determine subtypes ) Customization we have only two fields to display, one is federal and the other one is State.
My question is what's the procedure if one has to add a new field in ESS for City?
Can someone pls take few mins to explain in detail? I really appreciate your help on this regard!
Thanks!

Check Infotype 210 I am not sure

UK Payroll tax code 1000L

Hello Friends:
In UK Payroll new tax code 1000L I have updated in Constant table V_T511K effective April 06th 2014 but this code is not going to Ceridian interface(PU12). Any help is appreciated. Thanks in Advance

What exactly is your problem. UK tax is on a cumulative basis, and typically there are slabs with different rates, so it is difficult too work out a percentage for each wagetype.

Payroll taxes

Hi all,
any buddy know how to get taxes from payroll to put it in my program becouse the wage type (9tax) does not exist in table or put the value in table just it can be found when run payroll
thanks,
BR,
Ahmed Masry

Hi,
1. To get payroll results / taxes from payroll,
we have to use some logic because payroll results are not stored directly in a transparent table, rather they are stored in a cluster.
2. Below is a sample code to get payroll results.
use ur own values for
mypernr, fpper, basic wage type (1000 in our case)
3.
REPORT abc.
*----- Data
DATA : myseqnr LIKE hrpy_rgdir-seqnr.
DATA: py_result TYPE payin_result.
DATA : mypernr LIKE p0001-pernr.
DATA : wpbp LIKE TABLE OF pc205 WITH HEADER LINE.
DATA : myrt LIKE TABLE OF pc207 WITH HEADER LINE.
*------- Read Directory
SELECT SINGLE seqnr INTO myseqnr
FROM hrpy_rgdir
WHERE pernr = mypernr
AND fpper = '200601'
AND srtza = 'A'.
CHECK sy-subrc = 0.
*-------- Read Results
CALL FUNCTION 'PYXX_READ_PAYROLL_RESULT'
EXPORTING
clusterid = 'IN'
employeenumber = mypernr
sequencenumber = myseqnr
CHANGING
payroll_result = py_result
EXCEPTIONS
illegal_isocode_or_clusterid = 1
error_generating_import = 2
import_mismatch_error = 3
subpool_dir_full = 4
no_read_authority = 5
no_record_found = 6
versions_do_not_match = 7
error_reading_archive = 8
error_reading_relid = 9
OTHERS = 10.
IF sy-subrc <> 0.
ENDIF.
myrt[] = py_result-inter-rt .
READ TABLE myrt WITH KEY lgart = '1000'.
In the above you can substitute wage type (LGART) 1000 with your own '9tax'.
Regards,
Amit Mittal.

Tax Jurisdiction % problem on the county & city???

Hi all
I have defined my tax percentage for output tax code O1 & CA1006001 as 7.25%, 1% & 0.5%.
My problem is whenever it calculates tax for each the state, county & city it should use the base amount as the total amount but what it is doing is it is actually adding the 7.25% state tax to the total amount & then calculating 1% tax for the county . Again it adds both those amounts to the total & calculates the tax for 0.5% as city tax.
Has anyone experienced the same problem before? Please help me..all your time is appreciated.
Thanks

Hi,
Please check the tax calculation procedure. Calculation of base amount (rows mentioned in FROM TO) may be including state and county for calculating tax amount at county and city level.
Hope this is helps.
Please reward points as a way to say thanks.
Regards,

Issue on transfering of payroll data

hii sap guru's,
i am new in sap hr..
my client has a requirement in which we need to transfer payroll data from the non-SAP system to the SAP system.
i have to store the payroll data into the RT table of SAP
can i use the option: IMG -- transfer legacy data.
how is the procedure for it? if it is wrong, what is the correct and easy way to do it?
this is urgent guys...please help
thanks,
regards,
sam

Use LSMW Record/Bapi method.
If it is middle year go live
look at this tables T588B ,T588C ,T5U8C and transfer your Payroll results,taxes ,arrears.
--- Bob Radi

How to clear UNB table in the payroll result?

Hi,
We are getting the payroll error- The gross wages do not cover the negative offset that has been forwarded. Therefore, no gross up is permitted while running the Grossup.
I see the below table "UNB table" in the last payroll result. "UNB - Unbalance table used for tax retrocalculation" .
I think we are getting the above error because of this UNB table, can anyone help me to how to clear this table?
When we run the regular payroll, no tax is being deducted.
Please help
Saurabh

Hi Arti,
Thanks for your reply!!..
Seeing your reply, it gives me bit confidence to crack the existing problem, however, I'm still not clear with your answer... let me explain you the problem-
1. Employee was given 350,000 though Taxable Bonus WT with regular pay check
2. Later it came to know- out of the above amount, 75000 was Grossup amount
3. So in next payroll run, they entered -75000/- in regular Taxable bonus WT and +75000 in Grossup WT and also they deleted one IT210 record of GA tax authority which was wrongly created; and ran the payroll
4. Since then, in next payroll period- No tax is being deducted, so we are creating IT221 infotypes with Tax wagetype
5. If we are running the Grossup wage, payroll error- The gross wages do not cover the negative offset that has been forwarded; therefore, no grossup is permitted.
While running the regular payroll, overpayment Wagetype is being generated.
Now, I saw this UNB table is created and the below wagetype are there in the UNB table-
WT /5UT amount 0.00
WT 5430 amount -75000
WT 0200 amount 12500 ( Monthly salary)
WT 4530 amount 350000
Now I am thinking, if we are deducting tax through IT221,if we clear this UNB table, our problem might get resolved
It will be a great help for me if you can tell-
1. how to check, claims process is implemented or not?
2. I have good HCM experiece but this claims process is very new to me- pls guide me how to do that
Waiting for your reply, thanks in advance
Saurabh Garg

To configure Sales tax for USA

There is a State wise tax rates.
This total tax rate consists of : State tax, City tax, country tax, special purpose district tax.
Below is some sample . I need to configure only Total Tax rate. Pl. let me know, what needs to be done in SAP. Pl. let us know the transaction codes from spro.
Accounting Entry in FI :
Customer                                      Dr 110
Sales                               Cr     100
Sales tax Payable     Cr     10
State     Customer Name     Client Location     State     State Tax Rate     City     City Tax
Rate     County     County
*Tax Rate     Special District      SPD Tax Rate     Total Tax Rate     *
+Arizona     American Reliable Insurance Company     Scottsdale, AZ     AZ     5.60%     Scottsdale     1.45%     Maricopa     0.00%     N/A     0.00%     7.05%     +
+     MiniCo, Inc.     Phoenix, AZ     AZ     5.60%     Phoenix     2.00%     Maricopa     0.00%     N/A     0.00%     7.60%     +
+California     1st pmf     Los Angeles, CA     CA     6.00%     Los Angeles     0.00%     Los Angeles     1.25%     LACT District Tax     1.00%     8.25%     +
+     Alliant Sprecialty     San Diego, CA     CA     6.00%     San Diego     0.00%     San Diego     1.25%     SDTC District Tax     0.50%     7.75%     +
+     Cencal     San Ramon, CA     CA     6.00%     San Ramon     0.00%     Contra Costa     1.25%     BART CTA Distric Tax     1.00%     8.25%     +
Edited by: Amitava Majumdar on Dec 9, 2008 6:11 AM

Hi ,
you can proceed in the following way
1) You would need to configure the tax procedure for USA copy TAXUS ( OBQ3)
2) have UTXJ condition in that
3) create the tax codes for the different scenarios FTXP
4) also modify your pricing procedure if it does not have the UTXJ condition type ( V/08)
5) Maintain the condition records to determine the releavant tax code vk11
6) Run the cycle & check whether the applicable tax rates get picked up
hope this helps
Thanks
Prashant

Tax issue Res UT, Work IL

Hi Guys,
We are on SAP ECC 6.0 bsi 9.0a#31. EE with IT0207 as UT and IT0208 as IL is causing IL State tax instead of UT tax. There is no reciprocity between these states.
When I view the log at USTAX node -> processing second subnode Tax Data(which is before the third node BSI Interface) shows residence code as 1 for IL and 0 for UT for tax type 01.
Tax     Res. Tax   Receipt Formula
Code    Code Type Form     Number
FED      0      01               01
FED      0      03               01
FED      0      04               01
FED      0      05               01
FED      0      06               01
FED      0      10               01
IL          1      01               01
IL          1      10               01
UT        0      01               01
This is a new hire and master data is correct. IT0207 as UT and IT0208 as ILIT0210 has FED and UT.
Any comment is appreciated.
Thanks,
Gajanan

Hello Gajanan,
Kindly check whether you have maintained the Nexus indicator for Reciprocity for the states as mentioned in the WIKI document
http://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/display/ERPHCM/BSITaxFactory9.0
Kindly check whether you have maintained in IMG --> Payroll USA --> Tax --> Tax Data Maintenance --> Tax Override --> Specify additional tax reciprocity attributes.
With Regards,
S.Karthik

Calculate sales tax based on all line items on the order

My users have asked to determin tax on the sales order, based on all the line items on the order. For example, if all the items are for product only, or if all the line items are for labor only, or if there is a mix of product and labor,
Order 1
line 1 product flag as both for vertex
line 2 labor flag as both for vertex
Order 2
line 1 product flag as product only
line 2 product flag as product only
Order 3
line 1 labor flag as labor only
line 2 labor flag as labor only
I do not see away to do this while the order is being created. In the order 1 example above, line one is entered, priced, and taxed as product only (it is the only line on the order at that time and it is product only). Line two is entered, it is marked as both. But I cannot send line item one back through vertex marked as both. Vertex processing is already complete.
I have looked at using both FYTX0001 and FYTX0002. With both of these exits I can only work with a single line item, i.e. once item one is processed it will not go through the exit when item two is added.
Any assistance would be appreciated.
Jay

Hi WCG,
Our business is located in California as well. California is a modified-origin state, where state, county, and city taxes are based on the origin of the sale, while district taxes are based on the destination of the sale. You only need to add Sales tax when your customer's billing address is in California. I do not believe that Catalyst currently supports district based sales tax. You could look into a third party solution like TaxJar and see if it could be integrated into Catalyst. We currently charge our California based customers exactly what we would charge them in our retail store.
So you want to do something like this:
-Ryan

HR - Payroll City Tax

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for