HT1270 Will  a Mid 2011 15" 17 core macbook pro run on 2 8GB 1666mhz memory? Told quad core MB Pro runs on 16GB at 1066 or 1666???

I have a what is said mid 2011 macbook pro quad core i7 with 4GB at 1333 Mhz, and read this is upgradeable to 8GB but also it will accept and run great on 2X8GB-16GB at either 1066 or 1666MHz-Can anyone shed light? I'm hoping fpor fastest I can get-I use as interface for recording and for photo work now and then. I usually put a 7200rpm HDD in but this came w/a 750GB/5400 and I wonder if the FSB/RAM speed and upgrading the RAM max will make up?
I'm thinking rather than always use ext 7200rpm hdd top record buy 2nd hdd at 7200 and use external open enclosure I can pop in and out use only for recording-I am starting back to school and have MS2011 Ofc but want to add Win 7 no virtual hdd's please, second question-can I add this w/o wiping all clean to reformat? Is this required to add partition for Win 7 or are these newer models designed to simply ADD-ON such MS software?
DO I EVEN NEED WIN 7 OR IS THIS A LUXURY? I would think my WORD, EXCEL, POWERPOINT is all I'll need for college classes requiring MS/Windows-am I correrct? I can eliminate problem #2.
MAINLY I WANT TP UPGRADE RAM-I FOUND CORSAIR MADE FOR THIS MODEL, 2X8GBAT 1666MHZ, AND A WEB PAGE THAT SAID THEY HAD A FLAWLESS UPGRADE AND IT RA EVEN FASTER AND SMOOTHER-This is the best Mac I've owned and I've had 100, including 27" iMac I sold-too much for my needs-I'm a prtable person-HELP!!! I get YES answers from my IT professional and others tell me only *GB at 1333, so WHICH?  Thanks, madthomii.

Hey,
Perhaps this is relevant ..........
(1) I have a very late 17" macbook Pro.  (It is actually the somewhat rare 2.5 quad model.)  One of the very last ones made.
(2) It comes with 1333 ram
(3) I swapped in 1600 ram
(4) IT IS ABSOLUTELY CERTAIN, THAT, THE MACHINE RUNS MUCH, MUCH, MUCH, MUCH, MUCH FASTER when you have 1600 speed ram.
(Indeed, it runs 1600 / 1333 = 1.20x faster on all memory operations - it's just that simple and obvious.)
I did many tests back-and-fore swapping the slow and fast ram, and it is very, very obvious, the speed difference.  Most operations on computers are just memory bound - everything from startup to rendering and the like is quicker - obviously and clearly quicker - with faster ram.
(5) I have had utterly no problems running the faster ram. It reports and runs the ram utterly normally, no problem.
(6) These machines cost thousands, and ram cost a few dollars - there seems very little reason you wouldn't do this.
(7) I do have one of the very last 17" mbp.  (It was "old new stock" - I bought it unused in March 2013.)  So, it's possible that OLDER 17" mbp will not run 1600 speed RAM.  But, I mean it costs like $100 to try, on a fantastic machine worth $1000s, so it's a huge win at low cost if it works.
I hope this helps future readers!!!  Cheers

Similar Messages

  • (macbook pro 2.4 ghz intel core 2 duo 2010 13" aluminum with 8gb of memory and a 250gb hard drive running version 10.6.8 with safari 5.1.4) Safari will open up intermittently on its own.

    I have a macbook pro 2.4 ghz intel core 2 duo 2010 13" aluminum with 8gb of memory and a 250gb hard drive running version 10.6.8 with safari 5.1.4. Safari will open up intermittently on its own. System preferences and the dock isn't set up to start safari. Can't figure out why this is happening. Had reloaded system from scratch and noticed this happening lately.

    Remove iAntiVirus, then reboot, see if it's better.

  • How to delete photos with Zero KB size that were downloaded onto mac pro osx vers 10.5.8, 2x2.8 quad core intel Xeon ?

    How to delete picture files ( nikon NeF and jpeg )  with Zero  KB  size that were downloaded onto mac pro osx vers 10.5.8, 2x2.8 quad core intel Xeon
    -- have not been able to move them or move them to trash without  crashing  Finder  ?

    Safe Boot, (holding Shift key down at bootup), run Disk Utility in Applications>Utilities, then highlight your drive, click on Repair Permissions, reboot when it completes.
    (Safe boot may stay on the gray radian for a long time, let it go, it's trying to repair the Hard Drive & clear caches.)
    Try trashing them in Safe Mode, reply if that doesn't help.

  • 12 core Mac Pro does not improve render time over iMac quad core

    I'm rendering the same composition independently on two computers and they are basically rendering at the same rate, which is slightly better than 1 frame per second.
    The project settings and preferences are identical in each instance (with the exception of memory and multiprocessing, which I have experimented with ad nauseum). The composition includes no motion blur, no effects, just a couple of layers of chroma keyed .mov files (using keylight 2.0) and some still images. Neither machine is running any other applications, except occasionally Google Chrome, which seems to have no effect on performance.
    Both systems are running the latest version of After Effects CC (2014) and using the Classic 3D renderer.
    System 1 MAC PRO:
    Mac Pro 12 core 2.7 GHz Intel Xeon E5
    dual AMD FirePro 500D 3072 MB GPUs
    32 GB RAM
    OS X 10.9.4
    System 2 iMAC:
    iMac quad core 2.5 GHz Intel Core i5
    AMD Radeon HD 6750M 512 MB GPU
    8 GB RAM
    OS X 10.9.3
    As you can see, system 1 is vastly more powerful, and yet no combination of memory/multiprocessing settings can get the system to render faster than system 2.
    It doesn't seem to matter how much or little RAM I reserve for other applications (I have settled on 4 GB), or the number of CPUs I reserve for After Effects. The one setting that has improved performance is turning OFF render multiple frames. And even then it only brings the performance of the Mac Pro up to par with the iMac. I have cleared my cache, rebooted the computer, and read everything I can find online regarding the optimization of render settings.
    Here's a comparison of the respective CPU Loads:
    iMac
    Mac Pro
    With such a low CPU load, After Effects is obviously not utilizing the resources available to it on the Mac Pro. What a waste.
    Can anyone help?

    There's plenty of debate about the new Mac Pro vs a kitted out iMac.  Benchmarks show that some iMac After Effects processing can actually be faster than on a Mac Pro, depending on the content and some other factors.  If you're using software that has been optimised for the Mac Pro's GPU-centric architecture, like Final Cut Pro X, you will see great benefits.
    mac pro vs imac
    In my own facility recently we opted out of purchasing Mac Pros this year, and bought top-end iMacs instead.  The benefit to cost ratio simply didn't make sense for us right now.  Mac Pros are awesome machines, but a significant component of their cost is the dual GPUs, which are simply no benefit to After Effects.
    Reports say that the After Effects engineers are working on a major revamp of the After Effects processing system, so I'm betting you will realise far greater benefits from your Mac pro in coming AE versions.  For now, you may continue to see performance that is not spectacularly better than a souped-up iMac, depending on the type of processing involved.
    I've seen a few benchmarks that suggest the 8 core systems give better bang-for-buck than the 12 cores.  Try reducing your processors to 8 in After Effects and see if it makes a difference.  With 8 cores, allocate 3GB of RAM per core to leave some RAM for the OS.

  • Can I replace my MBP 13" early 2011 dual core 2.3GHz intel i5 with the coming ivy bridge quad core?

    The ivy bridge processors are coming out soon (or may already be out). I have heard that macbook pro 13" models might be able to use the new processers due to their lower energy useage. I presume that I will be able to take my mac to an apple store and have it installed. Is this information true? Any ideas on a price?

    Is this information true?
    Absolutely not. The processor is soldered to the mainboard, and is not in a socket. It is not upgradeable.
    To upgrade, sell your old one and buy a new one -- just like a car when you want a bigger engine.

  • After upgrading to yosemite macbook air(mid 2011) cannot connect to macbook air(early 2014) via airdrop

    last night i upgraded mine and my wife macbook air to yosemite.
    before, we can share files with airdrop easily but now the mba (early 2014) can not send file to the other one , also the old one

    19.83 GB Page-outs
    You are maxing out your RAM. Try quitting Chrome, it seems to be a resource hog and try closing other applications that you aren't using.

  • New Videocard for Mac Pro 3,1 - Xeon 3.2 GHz (X5482) Quad-core processors

    Hi guys
    Am hoping you can advise me.
    Currently I have a
    ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT with 256 MB of GDDR3 SDRAM (two dual-link DVI ports). It was the card that was already installed at the time of purchase.
    I have not had any problems with it at all but as I do a lot of 3D (Cinema 4D) I think I would benefit from something more powerful.
    Can anyone recommend a powerful card that would 100% be compatible with my mac spec please?
    I have read an Nvidia Quadro FX 5600 is compatible. Does a Quadro 4800 for mac work also or any others?
    I look forward to hearing your responses.
    Thanks
    Sophia

    http://blog.weareboy.co.uk/why-you-need-a-better-graphics-card-for-cinem
    Graphic cards hierarchy chart:
    http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/gaming-graphics-card-review,3107-7.ht%20ml
    Card chooser:
    http://www.welovemacs.com/apvica1.html

  • Win 7 Activation in Boot Camp on Mid-2011 Mac Mini?

    I bought my wife a new Mid-2011 Mac Mini (2.3 GHz) to replace her older 1.66 GHz Mac Mini. After running all the Apple updates and getting the new Lion Mini set up the way she likes, I downloaded Windows Support software, ran Windows Easy Transfer on the old Mac Mini Win 7, and then ran Boot Camp on the new Lion Mini in preparation to installing Windows 7.
    Then I installed Win 7, installed all the Windows updates and had a perfectly fine installation of Windows 7 running. Until I tried to activate Win 7 online. I got the message that I had entered an invalid Product Key. So I entered the Product Key again, but I kept getting the message that the Product Key wasn't correct and that I needed to buy another one.
    This stunned me, as I had used the same product key to install Win 7 on my wife's old Mac Mini, which is now out of service. After Googling around for hints, I discovered something that I had missed: In Boot Camp 4.01 in Lion 10.7, a full-install retail version of Win 7 is needed. Aha! I had used the Upgrade version of Win 7 (Family Pack) I bought in late 2009 from Microsoft (I have 3 valid full-install Win XP and Vista licenses). I used the MS-approved double-install method to install Win 7 on the new Mac Mini to avoid the install-then-upgrade waste of time, not even knowing I couldn't install XP or Vista in a Boot Camp 4.01 partition.
    I actually have two Win 7 Family Packs, bought in late-2009, and I have 6 valid full-install XP and Vista licenses/discs. Only 4 of those Win 7 installs were actively being used until yesterday, although all 6 have been activated in the past.
    So here are my questions: Is the Lion Boot Camp 4.01 requirement of a full-install Win 7 disk causing the activation problem, or do I need to call Microsoft for a manual activation? Will Microsoft refuse to activate a copy of Win 7 Upgrade on my brand-new Lion Mac Mini even if I can provide proof of legal Product Keys?
    Thanks for any help, insight, tips. What a complicated mess progress can be!

    Solved the problem by using the Windows automated activation via phone. It took me several tries before I gave the right answer about how many computers had been activated with that particular Windows 7 Upgrade family pack Product Key. The magic answer was/is "one", even though I know for a fact that two computers in my household were actively using that Product Key. Go figure.
    Anyway, the good news is that you *can* use a Windows 7 Upgrade disk to install Win 7 in Boot Camp 4.01 in Lion on a mid-2011 Mac Mini, despite what Apple says. I'm going to guess that Apple is trying to steer its customers away from just the sort of thing I've gone through. Further good news is that Microsoft doesn't care about the Mac side of the equation at all, just that you can satisfy their phonebot with the right answers. :^)
    Thank God Apple not only doesn't use activation for its OS, but also in fact is headed willy nilly in the opposite direction with Lion.

  • No AirPlay icon on mid 2011 macbook air with a new Apple TV

    Hi. I just bought a brand new Apple TV. I own a mid 2011 macbook air on which I've installed mountain lion OS X. both the apple TV and my macbook air are connected to the same wireless network, yet i dont have the AirPlay icon on my macbook. I'm able to play music from my mac's iTunes library, and even tough the homesharing on iTunes is on, I dont have the airplay icon so I can't stream movies\videos\pictures which are not in my iTunes library.

    About AirPlay and Airplay Mirroring
    AirPlay Mirroring requires a second-generation Apple TV or later, and is supported on the following Mac models: iMac (Mid 2011 or newer), Mac mini (Mid 2011 or newer), MacBook Air (Mid 2011 or newer), and MacBook Pro (Early 2011 or newer). For non-qualifying Macs you can try using Air Parrot.
    Several Apple Articles Regarding AirPlay
    Apple TV (2nd and 3rd gen)- How to use AirPlay Mirroring
    How to set up and configure AirPort Express for AirPlay and iTunes
    iTunes- Troubleshooting AirPlay and AirPlay Mirroring
    iTunes- Using AirPlay
    Apple TV (2nd and 3rd gen)- Understanding AirPlay settings
    About AirPlay Mirroring in OS X Mountain Lion
    iTunes 10- About playing music with AirPlay
    Troubleshooting AirPlay and AirPlay Mirroring
    Using AirPlay
    Thanks to the $15 Beamer, AirPlay streaming is still possible on Macs  that do not support Airplay and mirroring.
    Other solutions are the Air Parrot, StreamToMe, and AirServer.

  • I have a mid 2011 macbook air and a new Apple TV but I can't mirror. What's the problem? I have checked display settings and I don't have the "allow mirroring" option there.

    What is the problem?

    About AirPlay and Airplay Mirroring
    AirPlay Mirroring requires a second-generation Apple TV or later, and is supported on the following Mac models: iMac (Mid 2011 or newer), Mac mini (Mid 2011 or newer), MacBook Air (Mid 2011 or newer), and MacBook Pro (Early 2011 or newer). For non-qualifying Macs you can try using Air Parrot.
    Several Apple Articles Regarding AirPlay
    Apple TV (2nd and 3rd gen)- How to use AirPlay Mirroring
    How to set up and configure AirPort Express for AirPlay and iTunes
    iTunes- Troubleshooting AirPlay and AirPlay Mirroring
    iTunes- Using AirPlay
    Apple TV (2nd and 3rd gen)- Understanding AirPlay settings
    About AirPlay Mirroring in OS X Mountain Lion
    iTunes 10- About playing music with AirPlay
    Troubleshooting AirPlay and AirPlay Mirroring
    Using AirPlay
    Thanks to the $15 Beamer, AirPlay streaming is still possible on Macs  that do not support Airplay and mirroring.
    Other solutions are the Air Parrot, StreamToMe, and AirServer.

  • I have mac air mid 2011 but I can't make mirror of MAC screen on TV .What to do? Pls help

    I have Mac air mid 2011 But I can't make mirror screen of my Mac to TV. What to do? Pls help

    AirPlay Mirroring requires a second-generation Apple TV or later, OS X 10.8 or better and is supported on the following Mac models: iMac (Mid 2011 or newer), Mac mini (Mid 2011 or newer), MacBook Air (Mid 2011 or newer), and MacBook Pro (Early 2011 or newer). You can see which Mac you have and which operating system you are using by selecting 'About this Mac' from the Apple menu in the top left corner of your Mac and selecting the 'More Info' button.

  • Will Illustrator run on 1.8GHz quad core processor?

    I am reading that Illustrator CS4 requires a 2.0GHz processor to run. I am assuming that is for a single core processor. I am considering buying a new computer running Vista 64 bit with a1.8GHz quad core processor and 4GB of RAM. Would Illustrator CS4 run ok on such a system?
    Thanks,
    Bob

    I think 1400 by 900 is good since you can run many of the motion graphic programs on such a monitor.
    1920 x 1200 is very good but now things have gotten to the point that they have higher resolution available.
    So I recommend the highest you need. The reason i say this is that once applications are made multi core worthy  and go 64 bit it requires more resources but it will perform better and what I mean by better is not necessarily speed on any one task but the it will offer functions that are not possible on the current cpus with the current application.
    It just seems to me you need a little more then what you are getting, a little more so that in the very near future you will not have to upgrade again causing you to end up paying even more that you thought you were saving.
    If you understand my logic.
    Though the answer to your original question is it can probably run, how well you would probably have to tell us after you get it.

  • Will I be able to stream my Macbook Air to my TV using Apple TV?

    On the Apple TV page, it says that I will be able to stream my iOS devices to my TV using Apple TV and a HDMI cable. It doesn't mention anywhere if I can stream my Macbook Air to the TV, though, and if I can't it would be a deal breaker for me.
    If it matters, I bought my Macbook Air in June, so it's pretty new. I'm running OS X 10.7.5, but if I have to upgrade to be able to stream it, I'm willing to do it.
    Thanks in advance!
    Jumbala

    Welcome to the Apple Community.
    AirPlay Mirroring requires a second-generation Apple TV or later, OS X 10.8 or better and is supported on the following Mac models: iMac (Mid 2011 or newer), Mac mini (Mid 2011 or newer), MacBook Air (Mid 2011 or newer), and MacBook Pro (Early 2011 or newer). It also requires the computer to be using wi-fi.

  • 2.0 GHz Intel Quad core i7 vs. 3.7 GHz Intel Duo Core i7 Processor: Why not make the Quad Core 3.7GHz?

    I don't really understand processors, but is the 2.0GHz Quad Core i7 really a better processor in terms of performance? If it has 4 cores why not give it greater processing speed like 2.7 or 3.0 GHz?
    I am asking because I am thinking about getting the high end Mac Mini, but I see that it's processor runs at 2.0GHz and the others in the line run at 2.5 and 2.7 respectively. Why is this?

    I'm really oversimplifying here, but...
    Let's just assume that each core runs at full speed all the time, the total performance of that processor would be the sum of the running totals of each core:
    Duo Core i7 = 2 (cores) * 2.7 GHZ = 5.4 Ghz total processor power
    Quad Core i5 = 4 (cores) * 2.0 GHZ = 8.0 Ghz
    Like I said, oversimplified.  But, you get the point.  Not to mention, most apps still aren't optimized, so at a given time they only use a single core anyway. In this case, it'd be more beneficial to have more cores, since they would (hypothetically) be able to run more simultaneous processes (four vs. two in your case).
    I gues the greater question is: what were you planning on using the mini for?  Most CPUs go underutilized anyway, so you may be better off getting a 2.0, and maxing out your RAM and maybe adding a SSD.  Those upgrades (the SSD especially) will result in a very noticeable increase in performance.

  • WARNING: DSP 3 NOT supported under Quad-Core G5 Systems!

    This is from my posting at the DSP forum and a warning to all...
    Alright, are you ready for this one? I just contacted Apple Support about running DSP 3 on my newly purchased Quad-core G5.
    Those of us with a Quad-core G5 system are SCREWED when it comes to using DSP 3. The Apple guy told me that DSP 3 is not supported under the Quad systems (because "the Quad systems didn't exist at the time that DSP 3 was around" but wait, didn't DSP 4 come out BEFORE the Quad-core systems, too?). You have to use DSP 4 if you have a Quad-core G5.
    I explained my outrage to the guy (very unsympathetic) that Apple does not post this information on their website and does not inform their Apple Store employees about the issue (I had mentioned to several employees of my intentions to run DSP 3 on the system when I was buying it).
    The guy said that no one's complaining about this issue because "everyone gets the latest and greatest software to run on the newest machines" and "that's just the nature of technology" Yeah, right. I hate to say it, but I have Windows 98 apps from a single proc that run fine on Windows XP on a dual proc system.
    Anyway, spread the word and give Apple some more money by upgrading to DSP 4, so that they can keep nickel and diming us. The guy mentioned that if anyone wants to complain, that they can complain to the Final Cut Pro discussions site since apparently, that's the place where Apple actually reads posts.

    Heya,
    Unsupported it may be, but does it run ok? I could
    see it having worse performance than on a single-proc
    machine, but it shouldn;t have any actual problems.
    The guy said that no one's complaining about this
    issue because "everyone gets the latest and greatest
    software to run on the newest machines" and "that's
    Well, given that you have bought their first machine
    which supports > 2 concurrent threads [e.g. one system
    thread and one app thread], I'd say he's partly right.
    Anyone forking out the money for a quad will be [partly]
    wasting it if they do not run applications that are
    written to be fully multithreaded, i.e. written with
    the quad in mind.
    This is probably especially true on the Apple platform
    as the programmers will assume that the user is on
    one of the handful of machines available at the time.
    Being inherently lazy, no programmer is going to add the
    complexity of supporting n threads if only single-proc
    machines are being sold [yeah,ok, there were dual-procs,
    but that really means a two-thread system, which is
    normally the case anyways ... one for GUI and one for
    processing].
    to say it, but I have Windows 98 apps from a single
    proc that run fine on Windows XP on a dual proc
    system.
    Given the nature of Windows 98[/95/ME] and the
    applications written for it, I am very frightened
    for your system integrity
    --Mike

Maybe you are looking for

  • How to output a logo stored as standard text to excel using OLE

    Hi Experts, I have a requirement to write a program which creates an excel spreadsheet to download data from SAP.  The client would like the spreadsheet formatted with merged cells, background colours, different size fonts and in the top left corner

  • Urgent : Issue with deleting Line Item in ME22N

    Hi all, I have an issue with deleting line item in ME22N for some Purchase Orders. When I try to delete the line item, a warning message comes up saying that " Quantity invoiced or delivered is less than the quantity ordered". And I am unable to proc

  • Oracle Critical Patch Update Advisory - January 2013

    Hi all, 11.2.0.3 Oracle Critical Patch Update - January 2013 I am confused about CPU, PSU, SPU, USP. I am reading the docs and it seems they are same thing being rambled? Which of them is the most important to apply? Thanks, PetraK

  • Not able to extend the disk partition in our server 2008

    Hi  all, extend the partition but t it not able to do that.We are using the windows server 2008 in our setup. one of my exchange server I want to extend the partition. I had already extend the partition but now its not able to do that and shows the b

  • ICal Integration with iWeb site

    I used PHP iCalendar (Thanks to Gs World for having it on his page) and thought that this is pretty cool. http://www.txbluebonnetwp.org/iCal/ What do you think? This page is under my main calendar site (Click on the Test Calendar link in the Banner -