Hyper-V host server upgrade from Server 2008 R2 Enterprise SP1 to Server 2012 R2 Datacentre

We are about to upgrade our Hyper-V host servers from Server 2008R2 Enterprise SP1 to Server 2012 R2 Datacentre to take advantage of the latest Hyper-V features.
This only concerns the host servers and not the guest VMs running on the hosts (they will be upgraded next year).
This is what is running on our host servers:
Host 1
File,print & issuing CA server
Exchange 2010
SharePoint 2010
Quickbooks server
Domain controller 1
Offline CRL CA
Host 2
SQL 2008
Forefront TMG 2010
Domain Controller 2
Windows 7 client
With this is mind, I have drafted a rough action plan as follows:
Create a list of all file locations for VM memory, snapshots, virtual memory and Hyper-V config files
Document all existing system settings
Gather server information, download drivers, RAID controller and other boot drivers & firmware updates (in case the in-place upgrade fails)
Test all software media
Copy all VMs onto external data storage (NAS drive)
As part of the upgrade process we will redistribute some hard drive space i.e.
expand them to their new sizes and verify the data integrity of copied VMs by powering up each VM in a test environment
Wipe and adjust the sizes of the host partitions to accommodate the expanded VMs
Perform an in-place upgrade to Server 2012 R2 Datacenter
Check EV, services etc
Change the default locations for VM memory, snapshots, virtual memory and Hyper-V config files
Upgrade Anti-virus and other system software
Test the system
Are there any glaring omissions? Does anyone have any tips they can give me?

Hi Marco,
always do a fresh Installation of your hyper-V Hosts, you could end up doing a lot of Troubleshooting with Drivers,Addons etc.. new Installation ist way faster.
Depending if you have a Cluster or Standalone Servers there are different ways to do it.
When you have installed your 2012 R2 Hyper-V Server you just can Import the VMs from the new Location.
As far as i know VMs with snapshots are not supported, so you have to remove them before doing that move and commit the changes to the vhd files, the VM need to be offline on 2008R2 to do that.
You do not Need to Export the VMs on 2008R2, just copy it, normaly you should have all Files of a VM in one Folder.
A working Backup is always your friend on such Tasks.
When the VMs are running on Hyper-V 2012R2 do not forget to Update the Integration Services.
Make Sure your Servers Hardware are still supported with 2012R2, see Server Catalog and Support Matrix of the Vendor.
And last one, where possible and supported convert the VHDs to VHDx Disks, after testing the first boot of the VM.
Udo

Similar Messages

  • Steps to upgrade from sql 2008 r2 se (nonclustered) to sql 2012 se (clustered)

    hello,
    I am currently running a non clustered instance of a sqlserver 2008 R2 SE and need to upgrade to a clustered instance of SQLServer 2012 SE. The underlying OS is Windows 2008 R2 SE. I already bought the second server with the same os online but havent installed
    sql 2012 yet. 
    I am thinking of backing up my databases and script out all the logins and linked servers first.
    Then upgrade the SQLServer 2008 R2 SE to 2012 SE. But can I upgrade it to a clustered instance directly? If yes then I can definitely add the other server to the cluster while installing sql.
    Can someone point me to the right steps for this upgrade process
    Thanks

    Hello,
    Direct  upgrade to cluster is not possible without installing SQL server in cluster aware mode. I would recommend you need to uninstall SQL server 2008 R2 and then create windows cluster between two nodes and then install SQL server in cluster aware
    mode.
    You are right with taking up complete backup of all databases with logins and jobs.
    Please refer below link there is an alternate solution
    How to move SQL server from standalone to cluster
    Please mark this reply as the answer or vote as helpful, as appropriate, to make it useful for other readers
    My TechNet Wiki Articles

  • I just upgraded from my 2008 MacBook to a new Macbook Pro. How do I get my time capsule to work on my new MacBook? I did data migration, but the time capsule did not pick it up. Any ideas?

    I just upgraded from my 2008 MacBook to a new Macbook Pro. How do I get my time capsule to work on my new MacBook? I did data migration, but the time capsule did not pick it up. Any ideas?

    If you migrated all the info from time machine to your new MBP. The TM will usually ask to connect to the old backups.. sorry I am not sure is this what you want to do.. Personally I think you start a fresh backup.
    BTW Time Capsule does not do anything.. it is a dumb hard disk in a box.. it is TM that does everything.
    Look at B5 and B6 here about connecting to your backup.
    http://pondini.org/TM/Troubleshooting.html

  • Question regarding Upgrading from Standard Edition to Enterprise Edition

    DB version:10gR2
    We want to upgrade from Standard Edition to Enterprise Edition.
    In the following documention
    http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/B19306_01/server.102/b14238/intro.htm#BABFBJCC
    It talks about
    Deinstall the Standard Edition server software.I don't understand what they mean by DeInstall the software.
    Question 1.
    By 'DeInstall' , they mean , use DeInstall Products in the Welcome screen of Oracle Universal Installer and Remove the chosen OUI Home.Right?
    Question 2.
    If i 'Deinstall' (ie. remove the software), all the binaries are lost. Right? So what is the point of having just the data files?
    Edited by: Citizen_2 on Apr 8, 2009 1:59 AM

    Citizen_2 wrote:
    DB version:10gR2
    Question 1.
    By 'DeInstall' , they mean , use DeInstall Products in the Welcome screen of Oracle Universal Installer and Remove the chosen OUI Home.Right?Yes, that means use OUI and deinstall the Standard Edition
    Question 2.
    If i 'Deinstall' (ie. remove the software), all the binaries are lost. Right? So what is the point of having just the data files?Because next point says install Enterprise Edition. For first get rid of old one and then install the needed one. There is no such option as upgrade in this case.

  • Upgrading from 4.6C to Enterprise 4.70

    Looking for high level documentation / presentation with regard to functionality / pitfalls when upgrading from 4.6C to Enterprise 4.7 which can be used to demonstrate to my client.

    Hi Terence,
    Pl check this <a href="https://websmp201.sap-ag.de/upgrade">OSS Link</a>
    <a href="http://www.thespot4sap.com/upgrade_guide_v2.pdf">Upgrade Guide</a>
    Regards,
    Suresh Datti
    P.S. PL reward points if the answer is helpful

  • SAP Server upgrade from Windows 2003 and 2008 R2 with Oracle Database

    Hi,
    We need to upgrade upgrade our Windows servers that are running our SAP systems from Windows Server 2003 to Windows Server 2008 R2.  We are using Microsoft Clustering for HA so an inplace upgrade seems not possible.
    Someone has suggested to us that we will need to export our database and reimport it to achieve this upgrade however but I cannot understand why this would be necessary (we are not changing the underlying filesystem!).
    Could someone please confirm whether a database export and import is required for this OS upgrade scenario?  I have done a bit of research but nothing has jumped out and now I need an answer to this quickly.
    We are running
    - ERP 6.0 NW 7.01 (soon to be 7.02 with ABAP stack only)
    - XI(PI) Java & ABAP
    - SRM (Java & ABAP)
    - Portal (Java only)
    - PLM (Java & ABAP)
    - BW (BI 7.0) (Java and ABAP)
    Thank You
    Felicity

    Hello,
    You need to go for 'Homogeneous System Copy' to achieve this, but since almost all the systems in your landscape include the Java Stack as well - so the system copy with Export/Import is to be carried out.
    Even if you are not going for file system change, but it is a Windows environment and you can't put SAP up on the target Windows (windows 2008 R2) just by copying the contents and file system from source to target. You need SAPinst to create the registry and all. - On top of that you have Java stacks involved, so for java stack you can't carry out just backup/restore method to put SAP up there on target - so you need Export/import because for java stack some OS level dump is to be collected during system copy from source and it needs to be imported on target OS.
    Are you clear on this one ?
    Read system copy guide once and Search in OSS for the Notes to check how to upgrade from Windows 2003 to Windows 2008 R2.
    Thanks

  • Upgrading from SBS 2008 and Exchange Server 2007 and Adding Modest Failover Protection

    I haven't seen anyone describe this scenario, so maybe it can't be done, but it seems it should work. Can someone either confirm this is viable or set me straight and tell me it's not wise (and if not, why not).
    I currently have SBS 2008 (2008 Server + Exchange Server 2007 + some other components). I use redirected folders so all my user data is stored primarily on the server, and then sync'd with their local harddrives for roaming use and as an additional
    backup precaution. I want to upgrade to a modern version of Exchange (don't care too much about the underlying server OS, but seems like a good time to upgrade everything). I also want to improve the reliability for rapid recovery in the event of a system
    failure. I have always felt nervous with SBS because it only runs on a single server.
    My plan is:
    Install Windows Server 2012 Standard on a new server machine
    Join that new server to the existing SBS domain and sync the users, etc.
    Install Exchange Server 2013 on the new 2012 Server
    Migrate the existing Exchange data and account info to the new server
    Demote the SBS Server and promote the new server to primary DC
    Reformat the old SBS server and install Windows Server 2012 on it too, and join it to the domain as a second DC
    Set up DFS Replication and keep all my user data folders between the two servers (so if one server fails, the other can take over, just not automatically like with a cluster)
    Install Exchange Server 2013 on the reformatted 2012 Server box (so second instance on the domain) and set it up to sync with the first Exchange Server 2013 via DAG (so if either computer crashes, the other can take over for both Exchange Server and file
    services)
    Wouldn't that give me a complete slow-response failover system without the need for setting up a cluster (I know a cluster would provide instant failover protection, but I don't need that kind of speed - a manual switchover in the rare event of a server
    failure is acceptable for us)? I could do this using cheap hardware for each server, because unless both servers fail at the same time, clients can point to the other server. And because it's not a formal cluster, I don't need to buy anything for a shared
    SAN. This seems like such an obvious more cost-effective solution for a small network, I don't understand why this isn't a common approach, which makes me wonder if there is some reason it won't work.
    Any suggestions or feedback? Are Redirected Folders still recommended for users on a Server 2012-based domain?
    Thanks,
    Colin
    Colin

    Ed, thanks again for your help. OK, so here's my updated plan (I realize I should probably check on some of these pieces on the Server group, instead of this Exchange group).
    Constraints/objectives:
    None of the machines are truly server grade hardware, but only 5 people on the network, so performance is generally not an issue, unless a given server is just pegged on CPU or HD due to its own internal maintenance tasks and can't respond to user requests.
    Haven't seen any problems, since upgrading server from 4GB RAM to 8GB a few years ago.
    Not going to buy any new hardware at this time, but do have several unused consumer-grade computers I can deploy as wimpy or moderate servers.
    Main issue is to limit repair time in the event of a system failure (instant failover is not required, but want to be able to restore network functions within less than 24 hours in the event of a hardware failure) and minimize time spent on IT
    maintenance.
    Because of light IT maintenance (not anyone's primary job and we're too small to justify a dedicated IT person or to pay for outside help), almost every touch takes me research and time to re-learn what I haven't done in weeks, months, or years -- so also
    want to keep all IT tasks as simple as possible.
    We philosophically want to invest now for the next 5 years and avoid ongoing cloud fees (so zero interest in Windows Server Essentials with Exchange Online)
    A little nervous about using VM's, just because I never have before, but I do respect that's probably the right way to do many of these things...
    Currently I have SBS 2008 (Windows Server 2008 R2, Exchange Server 2007, WSUS 3, all with latest SP's, also includes SharePoint and other stuff, but I don't really care about most of it) on a single 8GB consumer grade system, which functions as a file
    server and Exchange server. We use Redirected Folders and Offline files for all users, which works great for us and provides additional file redundancy (if server goes down, all of each user's files are also on their own machine and they can even continue
    to work just fine w/o the server, losing only ability to send and receive e-mail). It has been sufficient, but I want to upgrade our version of Exchange and I am nervous that if that current one server fails, it would take me a long time to restore everything
    from backup, easily many days, especially if I need to buy any replacement hardware. It is RAID1, so a single drive failure is easy to handle, but that's the only hardware redundancy for the current server.
    New Plan:
    Install Windows Server 2012 R2 Standard on a new modest machine (16GBR RAM, Core i7, 1TB RAID1 (may upgrade to 3 or 4 TB), 256 GB SSD boot drive, this had been my old personal computer)
    Join that new server to the existing SBS domain (2008 R2/Exchange 2007), make it a DC, sync the users, etc.
    Install Windows Server 2012 R2 Standard on a wimpy computer (4GB RAM Core i3 processor), leave it as a member server
    Install Exchange Server 2013 on the wimpy new 2012 R2 Server (and nothing else, this will be dedicated to Exchange to make the most of such a wimpy machine)
    Migrate the existing Exchange data from the old SBS Exchange 2007 server and account info to the new server
    (or should I just create new accounts and copy the data from the user end through Outlook -- is that safer and cleaner than attempting any kind of server-level Exchange data migration?)
    Demote the old SBS Server and promote the new 16GB server to primary DC. Now it's OK to take the old SBS server off the network.
    Reformat the old SBS server and install Windows Server 2012 R2 on it too, and join it to the domain as a second DC (and possibly DCPROMO it to be the main server)
    Install Exchange Server 2013 in a VM on the reformatted 2012 R2 Server box (so second instance on the domain for Exchange redundancy) and set it up to sync with the first Exchange Server 2013 via DAG OR set up another physical wimpy member server and install
    it there. In any case, do NOT install Exchange directly on either DC.
    Set up DFS Replication or a Failover Cluster (still need to research this, but I had planned on DFS, thinking Cluster required shared drive, but Ed corrected me on this) between the two DC's for redirected files and keep all my user data folders between
    the two servers. We don't need automatic failover, like with a cluster, a manual switch would be acceptable, but if no additional cost or risk to clustering the two DC's, then the auto-failover protection that provides would be better than DFS.
    I think this incorporates all of your points, Ed. Does this sound right now? What's your advice on #5 (how to best migrate user data)?
    Thanks so much for all your help,
    Colin

  • SharePoint 2013 Server OS upgrade from Windows 2008 R2 to Windows 2012 R2

    Is it possible to have SharePoint 2013 farm to have mixed version of OS (Windows 2008 R2 and Windows 2012 R2). 
    We have a request to upgrade our farm servers from WIN 2008 R2 to Win 2012 R2. We have 5 servers in farm - 
    2 App servers - running with Central Admin, Service Applications, User Profile
    3 Web Front End Servers- running web application, search and workflow manager
    the database layer is separate on sql 2012 R2
    We want to upgrade OS from windows 2008 R2 to windows 2012 R2 and SQL to SQL 2014. 
    What will be right approach to do OS upgrade in above scenario to minimize the impact of downtime.
    May be add windows 2012 based servers in farm one by one and replace the windows 2008 R2 based servers from server.
    Regards,
    Kunal Abrol

    Its possible, but I wouldn't recommend it.  The problem is that you can only install SharePoint 20103 on Windows Server 2012 r2 using the slipstreamed SP1 version.  I assume that you used the regular version to install on you Server 2008 r2 versions.
     Even if you upgrade those servers to SP1 there are some minor differences in the builds between slipstreamed SP1 and upgraded SP1.  So although it will work it isn't recommended.
    Also, you should be aware the upgrade of inplace SharePoint servers running Windows 2008 r2 to Windows 2012 r2 is not supported.  
    To upgrade to server 2012 you'll need to add 2012 servers to your environment using the slipstreamed version os SharePoint and then remove the old server 2008 r2 servers as soon as possible.  For the period of the upgrade you should be able to get away
    with running the farm in a mixed state.
    Paul Stork SharePoint Server MVP
    Principal Architect: Blue Chip Consulting Group
    Blog: http://dontpapanic.com/blog
    Twitter: Follow @pstork
    Please remember to mark your question as "answered" if this solves your problem.

  • Limitations for upgrading SQL server database engin from SQL 2008 R2 enterprise edition to SQL 2014 enterprise edition

    Dear All,
    we are planning to upgrade  SQL Server 2008 R2 Enterprise edition to SQL Server 2014 Enterprise edition.
    please suggest the limitations for the up gradation.
    Thanks in Advance
    Vineet Srivastava
    NIIT Technology Ltd.
    New Delhi , India

    Hello,
    Please note that we have 2 Enterprise Editions now: 
    (1) Enterprise Edition with Server + Client Access License (CAL) and (2) the Enterprise Edition licensed by core. “Enterprise Edition with Server + Client Access License (CAL) based licensing (not available
    for new agreements) is limited to a maximum of 20 cores per SQL Server instance. There are no limits under the Core-based Server Licensing model”. Source:
    https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms143760(v=sql.120).aspx
    Hope this helps.
    Regards,
    Alberto Morillo
    SQLCoffee.com

  • Can't upgrade Windows Server 2008 R2 Enterprise to Windows Server 2012 R2 Standard

    Even though the "Windows Server Installation and Upgrade" TechNet article (DN627667) claims that I can upgrade Windows Server 2008 R2 SP1 to Windows Server 2012 R2 Standard, it seems I can't. I get an error message saying "Windows 2008
    R2 Enterprise cannot be upgraded to Windows Server 2012 R2 Standard (Server Core Installation). You can choose to install a new copy of Windows..." What might be causing this issue? Thanks for any input! :)

    Hi,
    Firstly, for retail versions, Windows Server 2008 R2 Enterprise with SP1 can be upgraded to Windows Server 2012 R2 Standard/Datacenter.
    I assume you are running Windows Server 2008 R2 retail version, right?
    In addition, it seems that in earlier version than Windows Server 2012,
    once you install the server in Core or with GUI mode, you could not switch to the other. The only option was to rebuild the server from scratch.
    Did you install Windows Server 2008 R2 in GUI? If yes, I recommend you to upgrade it to Windows Server 2012 R2 in GUI
    mode to see if the issue persists. If it succeed and you want to run in server core, you can just remove the graphical shell and convert your Windows Server 2012 R2 to Server Core.
    Best regards,
    Susie
    Thanks for replying Susie. The 2008 R2 software is the one provided by Microsoft for Action Pack subscribers, so I'm assuming it's not retail. That's another thing, I think I should be installing the GUI as my 2008 has a GUI, not just the server core. For some
    reason I missed that and clicked on the server core only install!

  • SAP Content Server Upgrade from 6.3 to 6.4 & MaxDB 7.3 to 7.8

    Dear Experts,
    We are in planning of upgrade SAP Content server from 6.3 to 6.4 and MaxDB from 7.3 build 35 to 7.8.
    For Content server upgrade is that we need to install the Content server 6.4 and install the latest MaxDB 7.8 and export and import the data.
    We are on Win 2003 32 Bit and we are migrating to win 2008 R2 64 Bit.
    Is it possible directly using database copy and restoring in MaxDB 7.8 version?
    Or we need to use loadercli for migrating the data.
    As per the SDN Link http://forums.sdn.sap.com/thread.jspa?threadID=1649661
    for content server upgrade is by replacing latest dll files at the respective dir.
    Pls let me know your views and known issues.
    Thank You,
    Mahesh

    Hello Mahesh,
    In note [735598|http://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/735598] you can see:
    If your source version is 7.3.00 or 7.4.03, read the upgrade guide "Upgrade to MaxDB Release 7.5" or "Upgrade to MaxDB Release 7.6" on SAP Service Marketplace:
    http://service.sap.com/instguides > Other Documentation > Database Upgrades > MySQL MaxDB
    Regards,
    Eduardo Rezende

  • Xen DomU Primary server - Upgrade from 10.3.4 to ZCM 11.2.x

    I have a ZCM 10.3.4 service running on a XEN SLES11-sp1 paravrtualised DomU.
    The ZCM upgrade to 11.2 instructions warn against extracting the ZCM 11.2 iso file and using that as the upgrade source, instead recommending creating a physical DVD and using that as the source.
    As I have a vitualised server I assumed it would be easy to mount the iso as a virtual CD for the guest to use and crack on with the install... but after finding the virt-manager 'add a CD/DVD' option didn't
    give me the results I was hoping for (a nice shiny CD icon on the desktop of the virtual server and a 'there it is!' moment after opening nautilus...) I attempted to follow the SuSE instructions for attaching
    a CD reader Block device. This asks you to attach a device tap:cdrom:/dev/sr0 or file:/path to iso/ zcm112.iso to an unused block device (say xvdb) and then mount the block device to the DomU guest's
    file system (/mnt/xvdb... for example).
    This is great for accessing the data, but to my eyes accessing the DVD's installation files from a mounted directory on the guest server isn't any different to extracting the CD/DVD and trying to run the
    install from the extracted files on a standard physical box.
    Does anyone know why extracting the install iso isn't recommended and more importantly how to upgrade ZCM 10.3 running on a XEN virtual server to 11.2?
    cheers

    ptrask,
    It appears that in the past few days you have not received a response to your
    posting. That concerns us, and has triggered this automated reply.
    Has your problem been resolved? If not, you might try one of the following options:
    - Visit http://support.novell.com and search the knowledgebase and/or check all
    the other self support options and support programs available.
    - You could also try posting your message again. Make sure it is posted in the
    correct newsgroup. (http://forums.novell.com)
    Be sure to read the forum FAQ about what to expect in the way of responses:
    http://forums.novell.com/faq.php
    If this is a reply to a duplicate posting, please ignore and accept our apologies
    and rest assured we will issue a stern reprimand to our posting bot.
    Good luck!
    Your Novell Product Support Forums Team
    http://forums.novell.com/

  • Weblogic 6.1 server upgrade from SP2 to SP3

    Hi All
    We have weblogic server 6.1 SP2 installed on the solaris machine. Now we
    have to upgrade our weblogic server 6.1 SP3. We also have downloaded the installable.
    But that installable seems to over-write the previous weblogic server & installs
    the server afresh. Is there any patch kinda thing available which allows me to
    upgrade from SP2 to SP3 ? I don't want a fresh new install of SP3 server.
    thanks in advance
    -Kiran Rane

    Upgrade installer from SP2 to SP3 is only available for paid BEA
    customers. You need a login at http://support.bea.com
    Kumar
    kiran rane wrote:
    Hi All
    We have weblogic server 6.1 SP2 installed on the solaris machine. Now we
    have to upgrade our weblogic server 6.1 SP3. We also have downloaded the installable.
    But that installable seems to over-write the previous weblogic server & installs
    the server afresh. Is there any patch kinda thing available which allows me to
    upgrade from SP2 to SP3 ? I don't want a fresh new install of SP3 server.
    thanks in advance
    -Kiran Rane

  • Weblogic Portal ( Server ) upgrade from 10.0 MP1 to 10.3.5

    HI,
    We are currently attempting to upgrade WebLogic Portal Server in development environment and having problems when i run the installer. ( WLS1035_upgrade_generic.jar ).
    I'm attempting this upgrade in Windows 7 professional environment ( 64 bit )  and it is a Windows VM with in a MAC OS X.
    Problem  : At the screen where it asks to Choose Middleware Home Type  ---> click next   --->  it shows error message saying Product is not Installed.
    Environment   :    Upgrade of WebLogic 10.0 MP1 portal server ( JDK 1.5_30 )  on a Windows Virtual Machine running using Parallels Desktop software
    Existing attempts  :    
    I went through the forums and tried
    -  Oracle's Minimum Technical Requirements says that i need to have JDK 1.6_24 and have installed JDK  1.6.0_35. ( jdk-6u35-windows-x64.exe ) .
       I'm currently  running the setup from command prompt using this version of Java.
    -  Tried using BEA WebLogic smart upgrade. But it is not recognising our Oracle Support Login  credentials. I tried doing this in offline mode having the above .jar and .zip  file patch in the correct directory but its not recognising.
    Weblogic home directory is c:\bea and it has got all the directories inside it  -   i don't understand the reason why installer is not able to identify the existing WLS installation.
    I would appreciate help around this as i'm not sure what else to try ?
    Cheers,

    I am not sure what you are doing is supported. You cannot upgrade a 10.0 to a 10.3.5 the way you are trying. The updater may be used to upgrade froma 10.3.x to 10.3.5 i believe. Check this out Upgrading WebLogic Server 9.x or 10.0 Application Environments to 10.3.5

  • Mac OS-X server upgrade from v3.2.1 to v.3.2.2

    Hi, I just upgrade my OS-X to Yosemite. But I found that my Mac OS-X server cannot work. It is version3.2.1 and I cannot upgrade to version 3.2.2. My server is now stop working. Any suggestion?
    Do I need to delete the OS-X server and download the new one again from Apple Store. I need my server back again ASAP as it holds all my teaching notes for my students, thank you
    Jimmy from Hong Kong

    Thank you for your advice. Unfortunately, the Apple Store only has OS-X server 3.2.2. When I tried to upgrade it and I got the error message again " Server can’t be installed on “Macintosh HD” because the version of OS X is too new."
    Any advice to find the OS-X version 4.0 from Apple Store.
    Thank you
    Jimmy

Maybe you are looking for