I686 or x64?

Was using Arch i686 for last couple years. Now i got new desktop with Quad Q6600/4GB RAM... so now im thinking if i should install Arch i686 again or go for x64.
Will i get noticeble perfomance improvement on x64?
So far i get i686 system wont be able to use all 4GB of memory?
I use wine often. I found wiki page describing how to compile it on x64, but how stable it actually works?
Sorry for noob questions

Evzin wrote:Will i get noticeble perfomance improvement on x64?
Maybe.  It will be a bit faster. If you will notice it, that's a different story.
Evzin wrote:I use wine often. I found wiki page describing how to compile it on x64, but how stable it actually works?
I think all the open source software out there works just as well on 64bit as on 32bit.
Closed source things like Flash are a bit harder to configure on 64bit but it's actually still quite simple.  By coincidence I did it today but it was pretty easy.  Just follow the wiki and you should be fine ( http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Ins … _on_Arch64 )

Similar Messages

  • [SOLVED]Cannot print to PDF files neither from Chromium nor from Firef

    When I open the print dialog and select "Print to file" to print to a PDF file, it works from applications such as gedit, evince, LibreOffice (this one uses a different print dialog, but works anyway), etc. but it is not working when using it from Chromium or from Firefox. Printing to a standard printer from these browsers works.
    When I launch chromium from the terminal and try printing to a PDF file, it outputs this error message in the console:
    [2229:2229:0618/092520:ERROR:print_dialog_gtk.cc(406)] Printing failed: Operation not supported
    When I repeat the process from Firefox, no error message is printed in the console.
    Printing to files was working until recently, I suppose an update broke it. I have Arch installed in 3 different computers (one i686, one x64 and one arm7h), and it is broken in the 3 of them. I'm using XFCE4, and both ghostscript and a2ps are installed.
    Is this a known bug? Can it be solved/workarounded?
    Last edited by doragasu (2013-06-19 06:46:10)

    dag wrote:ya you have to name it for some reason it happens to me too but if i name it it works.
    I didn't believe it until I tried, but you're right! You have to change the default name in the printing dialog and then it works O_oU
    Really weird bug. THANKS!
    Last edited by doragasu (2013-06-19 06:46:35)

  • Linx 7 Tablet

    Link: http://www.linx-tablets.com/linx-7.html
    Install Notes:
    - Enter BIOS by holding Del-key on boot (e.g. for disabling Secure Boot, boot priority, etc.)
    - Using Kernel 4.0 Mainline (x64): (config)
    fix-rpmb.patch: (credits: https://dev-nell.com/rpmb-emmc-errors-under-linux.html)
    --- a/drivers/mmc/card/block.c
    +++ b/drivers/mmc/card/block.c
    @@ -2264,7 +2264,7 @@
    return 0;
    for (idx = 0; idx < card->nr_parts; idx++) {
    - if (card->part[idx].size) {
    + if (card->part[idx].size && !(card->part[idx].area_type & MMC_BLK_DATA_AREA_RPMB)) {
    ret = mmc_blk_alloc_part(card, md,
    card->part[idx].part_cfg,
    card->part[idx].size >> 9,
    - eMMC should be partitioned as follow:
    /dev/mmcblk0p1 (type: ef00, size: 100M~, fs: FAT32, mount: /boot/efi)
    /dev/mmcblk0p2 (type: 8300, size: 100M~, fs: ext4, mount: /boot) <= Note: tried without, but doesn't boot for some reason
    /dev/mmcblk0p3 (type: 8300, size: max, fs: everything you like, mount: /)
    - EFI is 32-bit, so you need to install a custom UEFI-bootloader.
    Grub2 i386-efi seems to be only one that works. Build a standalone version or download these files and place in /boot (untested).
    /boot/grub/grub.cfg
    set timeout=5
    set debug=video
    insmod efi_gop
    insmod efi_uga
    insmod font
    insmod gfxterm
    set gfxmode=800x600x32
    set gfxpayload=800x600
    terminal_output gfxterm
    insmod part_gpt
    insmod part_msdos
    insmod fat
    insmod video_bochs
    insmod video_cirrus
    menuentry "Arch Linux x64" {
    # boot partition
    set=root --fs-uuid 6e1af556-ca91-4734-9b71-85e46f79187b
    linux /vmlinuz-linux-mainline root=UUID=7e80c04f-db4b-4150-bbef-8af8f16f9538 rw acpi=strict reboot=pci,force irqpoll add_efi_memmap intel_iommu=on
    initrd /initramfs-linux-mainline.img
    - WiFi:
    https://github.com/hadess/rtl8723bs
    Issues:
    - Touchscreen isn't response and a bit laggy, it should be possible to tweak this.
    Intel HD performance a bit weak.
    Last edited by beta990 (2015-05-14 19:57:51)

    tritonas00 wrote:
    Thank you for the info.
    Maybe using i686 may help on bootlader and boot issues? (because of 32bit efi)
    Found the problem! By forcing Grub to use a resolution/mode of 800x600x32 it now boots without any issues!
    Don't ask why.. think because there are so many issues with EFI and only Windows get checked for booting (normally).
    And no.. not going back to i686! x64 is the way to go!
    progandy wrote:
    - EFI is 32-bit, so you need to install a custom UEFI-bootloader.
    Grub2 i386-efi seems to be only one that works. Build a standalone version or download these files and place in /boot (untested).
    Did you try syslinux? The arch package should contain binaries for bios, efi32 and efi64.
    Edit: The same goes for grub.
    Thanks for the tip!
    For now I stick with Grub2-i686-efi, don't want to rebuild again.
    Last edited by beta990 (2015-04-03 16:15:02)

  • Syslinux 4.05-1 + linux 3.2.5-1 = no boot

    Just  as a warning to others: i just had a non-booting system with syslinux 4.05-1 and linux 3.2.5-1, hanging on the syslinux line right after it tries to load the initramfs. I had to chroot in to fix. I'm in a bit of a hurry today so i didn't check out which one is at fault, but downgrading both fixed things.

    core/linux 3.2.5-1 (base) [installed]
    core/syslinux 4.05-1 [installed]
    Everythig works booth on i686 and x64
    funny thing is that i can not find any changelog for 4.05 but still problem may lay in type of boot partition maybe?
    btw syslinux do not update boot image file "ldlinux.sys" so ehn you update you still use old one.
    edit: i found out that updating that file make it appear in /boot rather than old place /boot/syslinux so a little edit on path will be required.
    Last edited by cybertorture (2012-02-09 16:20:26)

  • [Solved] QuakeLive is lagging .. hugely

    Okay, so I am experiencing this weird FPS drop in QuakeLive.
    In the beginning, I had a GeForce 6800 GT, which was running QuakeLive just fine, it then got fried, and I ran on onboard for a while. I have now however required a GTX 460, and QL is starting to lag, Badly. It even ran better on the onboard card.
    I have a 2.2ghz Dualcore Intel processor, and 4Gigs of ram (although currently only 3 availabe because of i686 architecture). And of course my GTX 460 Graphics card.
    The weird thing is, every other game are running just fine, no fps drops at all.
    I tried lowering the graphics in QL as much as I could, but it didnt help either, and shouldn't be the cause of the problem either.
    I have also tried QLPrism which is a mozilla based browser that is focused entirely on QuakeLive, no luck there either.
    Help me out here guys, I really don't know what else to do.
    Last edited by Paaskehare (2011-09-27 08:11:04)

    Alright, It's not really "solved" - but I formatted my PC, and moved from i686 to x64, about time anyway. But anyway it's working fine now (duh).

  • X86 libs on x64 using --arch=i686 installes to /usr/lib

    Hi. I have x64, and need some x86 libs.
    I thought running "pacman -S --arch=i686 somelib" would just install files in /usr/lib32, but it seems it installs directly to /usr/lib.
    Of course, this is creating quite some problems as programs picks up 32-bit libraries.
    I'm afraid to restart my computes until I've fixed this.
    Any tips on how I can revert this?
    And how I can make "--arch=i686" install to /usr/lib32 by default? (or any other way to handle this)

    slint wrote:The arch flag is useful when you want to install something on a different system (for example a chroot). Normally you would handle this by installing the lib from multilib, but you can also create a dedicated 32 bit arch chroot.
    Oh..
    slint wrote:If you didn't overwrite any libraries from other packages (shouldn't if you haven't used -f) a simple pacman -R should be engough I guess.
    I didn't use "-f", but it seems pacman overwrote symlinks anyway.
    With -R, it complains that other packages relies on this, even though those packages relies on the x64 packages.
    "pacman -R -v --debug --arch=i686 somelib" doesn't give me confidence that it won't break my system if I drop checking for dependencies - not a single place are i686 referenced even though I specified --arch with -R.

  • Arch Live CD x64 hanging during boot at "triggering uevents"

    Hello!
    I recently was recommended Arch by a friend, and after I followed the 'Newbies Guide' and burning a live CD to install Arch with, it appears to hang during Live CD boot at "installing uevents."
    I am trying to install Arch as a dual boot on a late 2008 MacBook Pro which is currently running x64 Windows 7. I have plenty of HD space (100gb free and 100gb unallocated to install Arch onto).
    Here is a picture:
    http://i.imgur.com/Y8P41nf.jpg
    I get the same error weather I try to install x64 or i686 (I think that's what it's called). Is there any reason for this?
    Thank you!
    -- mod edit: read the Forum Etiquette and only post thumbnails http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/For … s_and_Code --
    (Sorry, missed that. My bad!)
    Last edited by RalphORama (2013-09-07 03:09:13)

    frank604 wrote:
    You can try nomodeset.  Seems to be a failure in loading a driver for your hardware. To read more on similar issues, there's a few posts with more info and suggestions by googling it. 
    Google result: http://lmgtfy.com/?q=halt+at+triggering+uevent
    Results:
    https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=151259
    https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=140426
    Thanks! I tried googling it myself but got mostly answers that didn't work. I'll try this!

  • Flash in x64 midori - can we get it to work ?

    Hello,
    I've installed midori and I really like (little ram usage, custom shortcuts, ect). Though, I can't get flash player to work ! I have a x64 cpu + midori gtk2+ package from the official repository. I've tried :
    - the midori-flash package from the aur, but it seems it does not support x64 cpu's : "This package no longer worked for i686, so I removed 'i686' from the arch array. Contributions that makes it work on i686 again are welcome."
    - the epiphany flash instructions (link found on midori's wki page) https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Epiphany#Flash
    - redefining the plugin path with 'export MOZ_PLUGIN_PATH="/usr/lib/mozilla/plugins"'
    with no success...
    I though have found documentation from the elemtary OS FAQ, especially this script :
    clear &&
    echo 'Installing Flash for Midori' &&
    read -p 'Press Enter to continue, or abort by pressing CTRL+C' nothing &&
    mkdir -p ~/.mozilla/plugins &&
    wget http://fpdownload.macromedia.com/get/flashplayer/pdc/11.2.202.378/install_flash_player_11_linux.i386.tar.gz &&
    tar -zxvf install_flash_player_11_linux.i386.tar.gz libflashplayer.so &&
    rm install_flash_player_11_linux.i386.tar.gz &&
    if [ $(getconf LONG_BIT) = '64' ]
    then
    mv libflashplayer.so ~/.mozilla/plugins/libflashplayer.32.so &&
    sudo apt-get install nspluginwrapper:i386 libnss3:i386
    else
    mv libflashplayer.so ~/.mozilla/plugins/libflashplayer.so &&
    sudo apt-get install nspluginwrapper
    fi &&
    nspluginwrapper -a -v -n -i
    But it is designed for debian distribution...
    Do you think such a script could function on arch ? If it can, I would need help to adapt it, especially : how can I select the 32bits version of a package with pacman (it seems to me that the script installs the x32 version of nspluginwrapper and libnss3) ?
    Thanks in advance for your help
    SergentPepper

    hmm, this is embarassing, but it is fixed... Actually one does not need the 32 bits nspluginwrapper, it works with the default one supplied by pacman. I will describe how i did so this topic isn't completey pointless :
    - go to /usr/lib/mozilla/plugin and delete the file libflashplayer.so ( ! this step may cause flash player to bug in other browsers )
    - get the 32bits version of the flash plugin (libflashplayer.so), here for example : http://fpdownload.macromedia.com/get/fl … 386.tar.gz
    - extract the file libflashplayer.so from the archive and copy it to /usr/lib/mozilla/plugin
    - install the package nspluginwrapper from the official repository
    - run "nspluginwrapper -a -v -n -i"
    - restart midori, go the the extensions settings, there you should now find the "shockwave flash" plugin
    Once againm, sorry for the disturbance

  • Database 11.2.0.1 on Oracle Linux 6 x64

    Hi
    DB installation's checker looking for i386 packages, but in OL6 x64 only available i686 and i cant continue installation of DB.
    Any solutions?

    Don't ignore the prerequisites in the installation guide, OL 6 is not supported. Even 11.2.0.2.x is currently not supported.

  • X686 or x64 for HD Media Playback on an AMD/ATI based system?

    Hello, I'm about to leave Xubuntu for Arch and, normally, I would automatically default to 32bit simply as I've had bad luck with media decoding in the 64bit realm. However, I've read lots about how refined the x64 variant of Arch is so I'm wanting to find out if I would be safe if I took the dive and gave x64 another shot.
    I've searched around here and browsed the x64 section and read a few other 64 vs. 32 bit threads, but my question is fairly specific and I haven't seen the answer anywhere yet.
    Primarily I'm concerned about ATI's driver being the same on 32bit and 64bit as I've been waiting for 9.3 in hope that it will fixe some problems I currently have with it (no hardware decoding for HD content, and a problem with underscanning on my HDTV). I've also had problems with there simply not being some 64bit codecs for some media, or that if they exist they are generally behind their 32bit equivalents.
    So that sums up my main concerns, also though, I've been reading through the install guide and wiki entries and haven't seen mention of x64 or x686 specific instructions. Is everything the same for both, or did I just miss something?
    Cheers

    Ranguvar wrote:I suggest this thread be moved to Threads Going Nowhere. Sorry, but this topic has been discussed over nine thousand times Search the forums, you'll see. I've _never_ had problems because of 64-bit Arch (except me being very stupid once and installing 32-bit packages straight from the i686 repos.....), but search for more testimonies both ways.
    Shoot, nine thousand times? I guess I should of searched a bit harder!
    But yeah, move it wherever's fitting, but I needed answers to my specific questions and got some good information I had not yet found (especially about the upcoming FFmpeg bluray support!).
    Anyway, I'm up and running with Arch and wanted to do a post install run-down. I did a rough install by the seat of my pants and manage to get it booting just fine. I installed links along with the base packages. Once I got it up and running I tried to jump straight to xfce4 (kinda thinking I was probably missing something) and then when it failed to start because X was not installed I took a step back and loaded the beginners guide in links. I read it front to back and then formatted and reinstalled.
    My first attempt would have been solid had I not messed up and installed grub to my /boot. I was unclear from the beginners guide as it was following a partition scheme that didn't have a separate /boot partition. I rebooted and I was presented with a grub terminal and unable to rectify it with commands after reading a bit on the forum and wiki. I blitz through a second install and got everything right, after rebooting grub loaded up and I booted sucessfully into my shiny new Arch install.
    From there I went through getting everything setup as per the guide, only ran into a problem when I was doing the baseline test with xterm. I was completely unable to get it to load dvorak during the test. I tried and tried but failed. Eventually I just gave up and moved on to installing xfce. Once that was installed I loaded it up and changed the settings in xfce and dvorak is now working.
    I'm not sure why one way failed and this other way worked. Whether or not xfce is superseeding the config from hal much in the same way that x superseeds the terminal settings.
    Anyway, just wanted to get this down somewhere.
    Thanks again for your guy's feedback.
    Edit: Oh, and my clock is two hours off, but that's for another day.
    Last edited by Adaemox (2009-03-25 06:26:06)

  • Installation of VMM 2012 R2 Console on Window7 x64 cannot pass accept terms screen

    I am installing VMM console on my laptop. Running wizard getting to the screen to accept terms. I checked the box but clicking next doesn't do a thing.
    I successfully installed VMM manager and console on the server and on a VDI. My laptop - no luck.
    Ran client install from command line:
    msiexec /i adminconsole.msi /l*v c:\temp\adminconsole.log 
    in the log file:
    Error 1723. There is a problem with this Windows Installer package. A DLL required for this install to complete could not be run. Contact your support personnel or package vendor.  Action CountComponentClients, entry: CountComponentClients, library: C:\Windows\Installer\MSI1D25.tmp 
    MSI (s) (80:FC) [15:48:47:787]: Product: Microsoft System Center Virtual Machine Manager Administrator Console (x64) -- Error 1723. There is a problem with this Windows Installer package. A DLL required for this install to complete could not be run. Contact
    your support personnel or package vendor.  Action CountComponentClients, entry: CountComponentClients, library: C:\Windows\Installer\MSI1D25.tmp 
    Where to go from here? Any suggestions greatly appreciated. 

    Hi,
    I tried uname -a and it returns the following:
    Linux NLABLINUX 2.4.21-20.EL.c0 #1 Thu Sep 9 02:07:03 EDT 2004 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux
    We have the following problems:
    1. I am having a box running RHEL 3.0 (got from centos.org). I have Oracle 10g running ok. Now I tried to install ASMLIB downloaded from technet. The files are:
    rpm -Uvh oracleasm-2.4.21-EL-1.0.3-1.i686.rpm \
         oracleasmlib-1.0.0-1.i386.rpm \
         oracleasm-support-1.0.3-1.i386.rpm \
    When I tried to install these files, I got the following error:
    Checking for Red Hat enterprise kernel: [FAILED]
    Also when I try to run /etc/init.d/oracleasm , I get the same error
    Checking for Red Hat enterprise kernel: [FAILED]
    2. We created 4 raw partitions /dev/raw/raw1 - 4 using raw command.
    [root@rcdell root]# ls -l /dev/raw/raw[1,2,3,4]
    crw-rw---- 1 oracle dba 162, 1 Sep 9 11:05 /dev/raw/raw1
    crw-rw---- 1 oracle dba 162, 2 Sep 9 11:05 /dev/raw/raw2
    crw-rw---- 1 oracle dba 162, 3 Sep 9 11:05 /dev/raw/raw3
    crw-rw---- 1 oracle dba 162, 4 Sep 9 11:05 /dev/raw/raw4
    then tried this:
    SYS at +ASM on 29-DEC-04 >create diskgroup dg1 normal redundancy
    2 failgroup c1 disk '/dev/raw/raw1'
    3 failgroup c2 disk '/dev/raw/raw2';
    create diskgroup dg1 normal redundancy
    ERROR at line 1:
    ORA-00600: internal error code, arguments: [kfdsk::grpmatch], [1],
    [3939617408], [], [], [], [], []
    ORA-00600: internal error code, arguments: [kfgrpJoin2], [5], [], [], [], [],
    ORA-15076: Emulating I/O errors on the OSM disk
    ORA-15076: Emulating I/O errors on the OSM disk
    ORA-15076: Emulating I/O errors on the OSM disk
    ORA-15076: Emulating I/O errors on the OSM disk
    Any help is appreciated.
    Irshad A. Buchh
    Senior Principal Consultant

  • [Solved] x64 - slow video performence?

    Hi all;
    I have been using i686 for more than two years, and on my current machine, more than 6 months, two weeks ago I moved on to x64.
    It seems that video playing is slow, and even stop for half a second when the video is busy.
    I am using Nvidia, and never had this problem in i686.
    This is very easy to detect if playing 3 videos in VLC, please if any1 is using x64 with Nvidia, do this test: open 4 VLC windows that play the same video file (on my machine this is impossible, the fourth one will not even open)
    Thanks
    Last edited by daf666 (2009-07-09 19:00:50)

    FYI:  I haven't fiddled with vlc's settings, so audio and video output are just set to "Default" (though I normally have it set to only allow one instance ;-)  Similarly, I haven't touched nvidia-settings and my xorg.conf is not so complicated:
    Section "Screen"
    Identifier "Default Screen"
    Device "GeForce 8500 GT"
    Monitor "Acer P223W"
    DefaultDepth 24
    Option "NoLogo" "True"
    Option "UseDisplayDevice" "DFP"
    Option "TripleBuffer" "True"
    Option "DynamicTwinView" "False"
    Option "RandRRotation" "True"
    Option "UseEdidDpi" "False"
    Option "DPI" "96 x 96"
    SubSection "Display"
    Viewport 0 0
    Depth 24
    EndSubSection
    EndSection
    but glxgears always reports > 3,700 fps running compiz.  I am wondering whether the slowdown is anything to do with the nvidia driver.  What else might cause vlc to pause while reading a file?

  • X201 Tablet: Drivers not working for Network controller on Windows 7 Pro x64

    Hello,
    After downloading and installing all LAN and WLAN drivers for X201 Tablet, I couldn't find one that works on Windows 7 x64.
    How can I proceed?
    Thank you in advance
    Solved!
    Go to Solution.

    I fixed it by downloading this drivers:
    https://downloadcenter.intel.com/download/18713/Network-Adapter-Driver-for-Windows-7-
    And after installing them and restarting, searching for them manually from the Device Manager.
    Cheers

  • Error while installing SQL Server 2012 X64 SP2,

    Error while installing SQL Server 2012 X64 SP2,
     When I installed the SQL Server 2012 X64 SP1, I got the attached error.
     What might be the issue here?
     Thank you
     Best
    Jamal

    Hello,
    Are you trying to install SQL Server on a compressed or encrypted drive? SQL Server won’t install on a drive/folder with these attributes.
    Are you trying to install SQL Server on a ReFS file system? It is not supported on SQL Server 2012.
    Disable any security/antivirus software and download the media again. Mount the media (.ISO file) and try to install again.
    Hope this helps.
    Regards,
    Alberto Morillo
    SQLCoffee.com

  • Error while deploying web role - Invalid application runtime - a runtime component is missing:/base/x64/IISConfigurator.exe

    I have Azure SDK 2.5 installed and when I try and publish my web role from VS 2013, it fails. When I manually upload the package and config through the Azure Portal I get the error:  "Invalid application runtime - a runtime component
    is missing:/base/x64/IISConfigurator.exe".
    I have tried uninstalling and re-installing the Azure SDK with no change in the error.
    Any ideas how I can troubleshoot this?

    I uninstalled the SDK, and tried to create a new cloud servce using the WCF service project template. The new project still gives me the same error:
    The file provided is not a valid service package. Detailed error code: WCFServiceWebRole1 Invalid application runtime - a runtime component is missing:/base/x64/IISConfigurator.exe.

Maybe you are looking for