Identifying follow up creation in CIC

Hi all.
In reference to this issue:
Another question about CRM_ORDERADM_H_BADI
Is there more definitive way to identify a follow up task - creation (when using BADI CRM_ORDER_H_BADI)? At the moment I'm using the statment:
IF sy-ucomm = '1OMAIN_FOLLOW_UP'.
But I don't feel very good about it. I tried looking up for a parameter that could help me in crmt_orderadm_h_wrk - but couldn't find anything helpful.
Thanks and Regards,
Jacob.

Hi Suvankar
You are correct, we only create an inquiry. Currently we don't have a backlog item to directly create an order. Let us know if you see many customers who would want to have the sales rep do the request and it goes directly to the order. Many companies do not want the sales rep to create the order. There are other scenarios, like in Cloud for Service, where a mashup is used to directly create the ECC order from Cloud for Service.
Your BADI is the best solution for this, assuming they always want to directly go to the sales order.
All the best
Ginger

Similar Messages

Search for Follow-Up Activity in CIC Search Area

Hi CRM Experts,
I am new in CRM world, so in customizing(IMG) path: CRM --> Transactions --> Settings for Activities --> Mantain Categories, Goals and Priorities --> Mantain Categories, I created an entry for a new category called Survey.
In Tcode CIC0 I create a Follow up activity with category survey.
But when I execute Tcode CIC0, and in the search area I limit the search to the BP that logged the
call->find:Business activty->By:Category->Category:Survey->Valid from:01.01.2006->Valid to:31.12.2006
But no follow-up activity is found.
What am I doing wrong?
The search works fine if I create a normal Business activity with category Survey, but as soon as I create a Follow up activity with category survey, the searh area cannot locate the activity, it even fails to locate it by transaction number??
Can anyone help me?
We are implementing CRM4.0, IC Winclient.
Message was edited by: Pragasen Govender

Hi Robert,
   Thanks for your reply
   I checked the link, But I didnt get the full information there.
   Firstly, my problem is not with upgrade and
   the second thing is before implementing the note 660016, I am able to see both in CRM GUI and Web
   UI all the business acitivities and tasks along with other transaction types as follow-up transactions.
   After implementing the note, I am not able to see only the business activities and tasks in the Web UI
   as follow-ups and in CRM GUI, its appearing as follow-ups.
   Hope you got my question now...
   If this is not done in customization I need to code according to my scenario..
   When I kept a break point this class is triggering from another class.
   Do I need to code in the class CL_CRM_UIU_BT_ACT_CUST_GET, according to my scenario.
   Again I have a question here, will you please tell me in which component this class exists, so that I
   will enhance that component.
   Because when I debug after clicking on the Follow-Up button,this class is calling some where
   down...So I am unbale to get the right component for this.
Regards,
Raghu
I

Question regarding Opportunity follow up creation from C4C into ERP

Hi All,
We have an integration scenario for C4C-ERP where we have the requirement of creating a Follow up Sales Order document from an Opportunity and get relevant Sales document information back in C4C. We have used the below Communication arrangement in C4C:
"Opportunity with Follow Up Business Transaction document in External System. "
Below HCI IFlow configured/Deployed in Eclipse:
"COD2ERP_OpportunityFollowUp_Replicate"
"ERP2COD_Opportunity_Replicate".
Relevant certificates/services all set in ERP.
Currently this standard IFLOW just allows to automatically create an Inquiry (Order request) document in ERP . Doesn't create the Sales Order. Based on our requirement ,we have extended the BAPI (custom development) in ERP to automatically create the Sales order from the Inquiry document. Wanted to understand if there is any standard process( HCI IFlow/Comm scenario) which allows the same as of today or SAP is working to get a standard solution in near future for the same.
Thanks,
Suvankar

Hi Suvankar
You are correct, we only create an inquiry. Currently we don't have a backlog item to directly create an order. Let us know if you see many customers who would want to have the sales rep do the request and it goes directly to the order. Many companies do not want the sales rep to create the order. There are other scenarios, like in Cloud for Service, where a mashup is used to directly create the ECC order from Cloud for Service.
Your BADI is the best solution for this, assuming they always want to directly go to the sales order.
All the best
Ginger

Surrogate or Buisness Identifier during Dimension Creation??

Hi I am using OWB and I am confused in identifying surrogate or buisness identifiers ?? What are they and how do i know if a certain field is a buisness or surrogate identifier??

Consider the example where a Customer dimension is sourced from 2 different systems, there is a Customer_ID = 1 in both systems but they releate to different customers.
In this case you should assign a surrogate key to the data e.g. Customer_ID = 1 from Source System A is given a surrogate key = 100 and Customer_ID = 1 from Source System B is given a surrogate key = 101.
This enables a FK/Join between the fact table and the dimension on a single colum i.e. the surrogate key, otherwise the join would have to be a composite key of Customer_ID and Source System.
It's best practice to always use surrogate keys.
Si

Searching Records Following the Creation of a Lookup Table

Hello,
Please excuse my ignorance but I have just created a lookup table by using the wizard in SQL Workshop. All is well text has been replaced by numbers. My issue is that when I do a search now using a drop down list based on a query it returns records based on other numbers as well. That is if '2' relates to an item the search picks up anything containing a 2: 2,21,22, etc. How can I get the query to return a value for the number selected and not anything containing that number?
and (
instr(upper("MODEL_ID"),upper(nvl(:P40_REPORT_SEARCH,"MODEL_ID"))) > 0
Kind Regards,
Swelch
Edited by: Steve Welch on Mar 9, 2012 12:03 PM

Here are two potential solutions
and (instr(upper('~'||"MODEL_ID"||'~'),upper(nvl('~'||:P40_REPORT_SEARCH||'~',"MODEL_ID"))) > 0)or
AND model_id = NVL(:P40_REPORT_SEARCH, model_id)The first is often used for components such as shuttles. I think I've added the special characters in the right place - not tested/verified against my previous example
The second may be more appropriate to your scenario, depending on your data.
Scott

What are the steps follows after creation of holiday calender,......

Hi Experts....
I have created Holiday calender for the year 2008 and successfully tranported to production server.What are the further things to be done to get complteness...
Please advice....
Regards,
Sai.

thats all.
it is advisable to run RPTUPD00
Revaluation of Attendance/Absence Records using Batch Input
The program creates a batch input session for revaluating absence and attendance records. A revaluation can be necessary if work schedule data on which the valuation is based changes after the absence or attendance is entered, for example.
The relevant absence or attendance records are saved when the batch input session is processed, and the absence or attendance data is revaluated.

Transaction type not found while creation of service order/ticket

Dear All,
I had done all basic configuration of CIC but i am not able to create service order and service ticket.
When i trying to create i am not able to find any transaction type but if i want to create follow-up document from CIC screen then i am able to create both the thing. I am not able to find out where is the problem. can any body help me out.
Thanks & regards
Neeraj

Hi Francis,
Thanks
I am on Interaction Center WebClient 2007.
I have already done the configuration and Transaction type is popping up for selection screen but once i select the transaction type then system automatically canceled the transaction "Transaction Cancelled"
But in the same time if i am trying to created follow-up transaction with reference to previous transaction then i am able to created service ticket/service order.
what could be the problem?
Regards
Neeraj

Slow table creation after upgrade from 10.2.0.3 to 11.2.0.1 using DBUA

I've recently completed a database upgrade from 10.2.0.3 to 11.2.0.1 using the DBUA.
I've since encountered a slowdown when running a script which drops and recreates a series of ~250 tables. The script normally runs in around 19 seconds. After the upgrade, the script requires ~2 minutes to run.
By chance has anyone encountered something similar?
The problem may be related to the behavior of an "after CREATE on schema" trigger which grants select privileges to a role through the use of a dbms_job call; between 10g and the database that was upgraded from 10G to 11g. Currently researching this angle.
I will be using the following table creation DDL for this abbreviated test case:
create table ALLIANCE (
   ALLIANCEID           NUMBER(10)                      not null,
   NAME                 VARCHAR2(40)                    not null,
   CREATION_DATE        DATE,
   constraint PK_ALLIANCE primary key (ALLIANCEID)
           using index
       tablespace LIVE_INDEX
tablespace LIVE_DATA;When calling the above DDL, an "after CREATE on schema" trigger is fired which schedules a job to immediately run to grant select privilege to a role for the table which was just created:
create or replace
trigger select_grant
after CREATE on schema
declare
    l_str varchar2(255);
    l_job number;
begin
    if ( ora_dict_obj_type = 'TABLE' ) then
        l_str := 'execute immediate "grant select on ' ||
                                     ora_dict_obj_name ||
                                    ' to select_role";';
        dbms_job.submit( l_job, replace(l_str,'"','''') );
    end if;
end;
{code}
Below I've included data on two separate test runs. The first is on the upgraded database and includes optimizer parameters and an abbreviated TKPROF. I've also, included the offending sys generate SQL which is not issued when the same test is run on a 10g environment that has been set up with a similar test case. The 10g test run's TKPROF is also included below.
The version of the database is 11.2.0.1.
These are the parameters relevant to the optimizer for the test run on the upgraded 11g SID:
{code}
SQL> show parameter optimizer
NAME                                 TYPE        VALUE
optimizer_capture_sql_plan_baselines boolean     FALSE
optimizer_dynamic_sampling           integer     2
optimizer_features_enable            string      11.2.0.1
optimizer_index_caching              integer     0
optimizer_index_cost_adj             integer     100
optimizer_mode                       string      ALL_ROWS
optimizer_secure_view_merging        boolean     TRUE
optimizer_use_invisible_indexes      boolean     FALSE
optimizer_use_pending_statistics     boolean     FALSE
optimizer_use_sql_plan_baselines     boolean     TRUE
SQL> show parameter db_file_multi
NAME                                 TYPE        VALUE
db_file_multiblock_read_count        integer     8
SQL> show parameter db_block_size
NAME                                 TYPE        VALUE
db_block_size                        integer     8192
SQL> show parameter cursor_sharing
NAME                                 TYPE        VALUE
cursor_sharing                       string      EXACT
SQL> column sname format a20
SQL> column pname format a20
SQL> column pval2 format a20
SQL> select sname, pname, pval1, pval2 from sys.aux_stats$;
SNAME                PNAME                     PVAL1 PVAL2
SYSSTATS_INFO        STATUS                          COMPLETED
SYSSTATS_INFO        DSTART                          03-11-2010 16:33
SYSSTATS_INFO        DSTOP                           03-11-2010 17:03
SYSSTATS_INFO        FLAGS                         0
SYSSTATS_MAIN        CPUSPEEDNW           713.978495
SYSSTATS_MAIN        IOSEEKTIM                    10
SYSSTATS_MAIN        IOTFRSPEED                 4096
SYSSTATS_MAIN        SREADTIM               1565.746
SYSSTATS_MAIN        MREADTIM
SYSSTATS_MAIN        CPUSPEED                   2310
SYSSTATS_MAIN        MBRC
SYSSTATS_MAIN        MAXTHR
SYSSTATS_MAIN        SLAVETHR
13 rows selected.
{code}
Output from TKPROF on the 11g SID:
{code}
create table ALLIANCE (
   ALLIANCEID           NUMBER(10)                      not null,
   NAME                 VARCHAR2(40)                    not null,
   CREATION_DATE        DATE,
   constraint PK_ALLIANCE primary key (ALLIANCEID)
           using index
       tablespace LIVE_INDEX
tablespace LIVE_DATA
call     count       cpu    elapsed       disk      query    current        rows
Parse        1      0.00       0.00          0          0          0           0
Execute      1      0.00       0.00          0          0          4           0
Fetch        0      0.00       0.00          0          0          0           0
total        2      0.00       0.00          0          0          4           0
Misses in library cache during parse: 1
Optimizer mode: ALL_ROWS
Parsing user id: 324
{code}
... large section omitted ...
Here is the performance hit portion of the TKPROF on the 11g SID:
{code}
SQL ID: fsbqktj5vw6n9
Plan Hash: 1443566277
select next_run_date, obj#, run_job, sch_job
from
(select decode(bitand(a.flags, 16384), 0, a.next_run_date,
a.last_enabled_time) next_run_date,       a.obj# obj#,
decode(bitand(a.flags, 16384), 0, 0, 1) run_job, a.sch_job sch_job from
(select p.obj# obj#, p.flags flags, p.next_run_date next_run_date,
p.job_status job_status, p.class_oid class_oid,      p.last_enabled_time
last_enabled_time, p.instance_id instance_id,      1 sch_job   from
sys.scheduler$_job p   where bitand(p.job_status, 3) = 1    and
((bitand(p.flags, 134217728 + 268435456) = 0) or
(bitand(p.job_status, 1024) <> 0))    and bitand(p.flags, 4096) = 0    and
p.instance_id is NULL    and (p.class_oid is null      or (p.class_oid is
not null      and p.class_oid in (select b.obj# from sys.scheduler$_class b
                           where b.affinity is null)))   UNION ALL   select
q.obj#, q.flags, q.next_run_date, q.job_status, q.class_oid,
q.last_enabled_time, q.instance_id, 1   from sys.scheduler$_lightweight_job
q   where bitand(q.job_status, 3) = 1    and ((bitand(q.flags, 134217728 +
268435456) = 0) or         (bitand(q.job_status, 1024) <> 0))    and
bitand(q.flags, 4096) = 0    and q.instance_id is NULL    and (q.class_oid
is null      or (q.class_oid is not null      and q.class_oid in (select
c.obj# from sys.scheduler$_class c                          where
c.affinity is null)))   UNION ALL   select j.job, 0,
from_tz(cast(j.next_date as timestamp),      to_char(systimestamp,'TZH:TZM')
), 1, NULL,      from_tz(cast(j.next_date as timestamp),
to_char(systimestamp,'TZH:TZM')),     NULL, 0   from sys.job$ j   where
(j.field1 is null or j.field1 = 0)    and j.this_date is null) a   order by
1)   where rownum = 1
call     count       cpu    elapsed       disk      query    current        rows
Parse        1      0.00       0.00          0          0          0           0
Execute      1      0.00       0.00          0          0          0           0
Fetch        1      0.47       0.47          0       9384          0           1
total        3      0.48       0.48          0       9384          0           1
Misses in library cache during parse: 1
Optimizer mode: CHOOSE
Parsing user id: SYS   (recursive depth: 1)
Rows     Row Source Operation
      1 COUNT STOPKEY (cr=9384 pr=0 pw=0 time=0 us)
      1   VIEW (cr=9384 pr=0 pw=0 time=0 us cost=5344 size=6615380 card=194570)
      1    SORT ORDER BY STOPKEY (cr=9384 pr=0 pw=0 time=0 us cost=5344 size=11479630 card=194570)
194790     VIEW (cr=9384 pr=0 pw=0 time=537269 us cost=2563 size=11479630 card=194570)
194790      UNION-ALL (cr=9384 pr=0 pw=0 time=439235 us)
    231       FILTER (cr=68 pr=0 pw=0 time=920 us)
    231        TABLE ACCESS FULL SCHEDULER$_JOB (cr=66 pr=0 pw=0 time=690 us cost=19 size=13157 card=223)
      1        TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID SCHEDULER$_CLASS (cr=2 pr=0 pw=0 time=0 us cost=1 size=40 card=1)
      1         INDEX UNIQUE SCAN SCHEDULER$_CLASS_PK (cr=1 pr=0 pw=0 time=0 us cost=0 size=0 card=1)(object id 5056)
      0       FILTER (cr=3 pr=0 pw=0 time=0 us)
      0        TABLE ACCESS FULL SCHEDULER$_LIGHTWEIGHT_JOB (cr=3 pr=0 pw=0 time=0 us cost=2 size=95 card=1)
      0        TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID SCHEDULER$_CLASS (cr=0 pr=0 pw=0 time=0 us cost=1 size=40 card=1)
      0         INDEX UNIQUE SCAN SCHEDULER$_CLASS_PK (cr=0 pr=0 pw=0 time=0 us cost=0 size=0 card=1)(object id 5056)
194559       TABLE ACCESS FULL JOB$ (cr=9313 pr=0 pw=0 time=167294 us cost=2542 size=2529254 card=194558)
{code}
and the totals at the end of the TKPROF on the 11g SID:
{code}
OVERALL TOTALS FOR ALL NON-RECURSIVE STATEMENTS
call     count       cpu    elapsed       disk      query    current        rows
Parse        1      0.00       0.00          0          0          0           0
Execute      2      0.00       0.00          0          0          4           0
Fetch        0      0.00       0.00          0          0          0           0
total        3      0.00       0.00          0          0          4           0
Misses in library cache during parse: 1
Misses in library cache during execute: 1
OVERALL TOTALS FOR ALL RECURSIVE STATEMENTS
call     count       cpu    elapsed       disk      query    current        rows
Parse       70      0.00       0.00          0          0          0           0
Execute     85      0.01       0.01          0         62        208          37
Fetch       49      0.48       0.49          0       9490          0          35
total      204      0.51       0.51          0       9552        208          72
Misses in library cache during parse: 5
Misses in library cache during execute: 3
   35 user SQL statements in session.
   53 internal SQL statements in session.
   88 SQL statements in session.
Trace file: 11gSID_ora_17721.trc
Trace file compatibility: 11.1.0.7
Sort options: default
       1 session in tracefile.
      35 user SQL statements in trace file.
      53 internal SQL statements in trace file.
      88 SQL statements in trace file.
      51 unique SQL statements in trace file.
    1590 lines in trace file.
      18 elapsed seconds in trace file.
{code}
The version of the database is 10.2.0.3.0.
These are the parameters relevant to the optimizer for the test run on the 10g SID:
{code}
SQL> show parameter optimizer
NAME                                 TYPE        VALUE
optimizer_dynamic_sampling           integer     2
optimizer_features_enable            string      10.2.0.3
optimizer_index_caching              integer     0
optimizer_index_cost_adj             integer     100
optimizer_mode                       string      ALL_ROWS
optimizer_secure_view_merging        boolean     TRUE
SQL> show parameter db_file_multi
NAME                                 TYPE        VALUE
db_file_multiblock_read_count        integer     8
SQL> show parameter db_block_size
NAME                                 TYPE        VALUE
db_block_size                        integer     8192
SQL> show parameter cursor_sharing
NAME                                 TYPE        VALUE
cursor_sharing                       string      EXACT
SQL> column sname format a20
SQL> column pname format a20
SQL> column pval2 format a20
SQL> select sname, pname, pval1, pval2 from sys.aux_stats$;
SNAME                PNAME                     PVAL1 PVAL2
SYSSTATS_INFO        STATUS                          COMPLETED
SYSSTATS_INFO        DSTART                          09-24-2007 11:09
SYSSTATS_INFO        DSTOP                           09-24-2007 11:09
SYSSTATS_INFO        FLAGS                         1
SYSSTATS_MAIN        CPUSPEEDNW           2110.16949
SYSSTATS_MAIN        IOSEEKTIM                    10
SYSSTATS_MAIN        IOTFRSPEED                 4096
SYSSTATS_MAIN        SREADTIM
SYSSTATS_MAIN        MREADTIM
SYSSTATS_MAIN        CPUSPEED
SYSSTATS_MAIN        MBRC
SYSSTATS_MAIN        MAXTHR
SYSSTATS_MAIN        SLAVETHR
13 rows selected.
{code}
Now for the TKPROF of a mirrored test environment running on a 10G SID:
{code}
create table ALLIANCE (
   ALLIANCEID           NUMBER(10)                      not null,
   NAME                 VARCHAR2(40)                    not null,
   CREATION_DATE        DATE,
   constraint PK_ALLIANCE primary key (ALLIANCEID)
           using index
       tablespace LIVE_INDEX
tablespace LIVE_DATA
call     count       cpu    elapsed       disk      query    current        rows
Parse        1      0.00       0.00          0          0          0           0
Execute      1      0.00       0.01          0          2         16           0
Fetch        0      0.00       0.00          0          0          0           0
total        2      0.01       0.01          0          2         16           0
Misses in library cache during parse: 1
Optimizer mode: ALL_ROWS
Parsing user id: 113
{code}
... large section omitted ...
Totals for the TKPROF on the 10g SID:
{code}
OVERALL TOTALS FOR ALL NON-RECURSIVE STATEMENTS
call     count       cpu    elapsed       disk      query    current        rows
Parse        1      0.00       0.02          0          0          0           0
Execute      1      0.00       0.00          0          2         16           0
Fetch        0      0.00       0.00          0          0          0           0
total        2      0.00       0.02          0          2         16           0
Misses in library cache during parse: 1
OVERALL TOTALS FOR ALL RECURSIVE STATEMENTS
call     count       cpu    elapsed       disk      query    current        rows
Parse       65      0.01       0.01          0          1         32           0
Execute     84      0.04       0.09         20         90        272          35
Fetch       88      0.00       0.10         30        281          0          64
total      237      0.07       0.21         50        372        304          99
Misses in library cache during parse: 38
Misses in library cache during execute: 32
   10 user SQL statements in session.
   76 internal SQL statements in session.
   86 SQL statements in session.
Trace file: 10gSID_ora_32003.trc
Trace file compatibility: 10.01.00
Sort options: default
       1 session in tracefile.
      10 user SQL statements in trace file.
      76 internal SQL statements in trace file.
      86 SQL statements in trace file.
      43 unique SQL statements in trace file.
     949 lines in trace file.
       0 elapsed seconds in trace file.
{code}
Edited by: user8598842 on Mar 11, 2010 5:08 PM

So while this certainly isn't the most elegant of solutions, and most assuredly isn't in the realm of supported by Oracle...
I've used the DBMS_IJOB.DROP_USER_JOBS('username'); package to remove the 194558 orphaned job entries from the job$ table. Don't ask, I've no clue how they all got there; but I've prepared some evil looks to unleash upon certain developers tomorrow morning.
Not being able to reorganize the JOB$ table to free the now wasted ~67MB of space I've opted to create a new index on the JOB$ table to sidestep the full table scan.
CREATE INDEX SYS.JOB_F1_THIS_NEXT ON SYS.JOB$ (FIELD1, THIS_DATE, NEXT_DATE) TABLESPACE SYSTEM;The next option would be to try to find a way to grant the select privilege to the role without using the aforementioned "after CREATE on schema" trigger and dbms_job call. This method was adopted to cover situations in which a developer manually added a table directly to the database rather than using the provided scripts to recreate their test environment.
I assume that the following quote from the 11gR2 documentation is mistaken, and there is no such beast as "create or replace table" in 11g:
http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/E11882_01/server.112/e10592/statements_9003.htm#i2061306
"Dropping a table invalidates dependent objects and removes object privileges on the table. If you want to re-create the table, then you must regrant object privileges on the table, re-create the indexes, integrity constraints, and triggers for the table, and respecify its storage parameters. Truncating and replacing have none of these effects. Therefore, removing rows with the TRUNCATE statement or replacing the table with a *CREATE OR REPLACE TABLE* statement can be more efficient than dropping and re-creating a table."

Inspection lot creation during STO return

Hello Gurus,
is there a trick to trigger inspection lot creation during STO return ?
Scenario is the following:
1 - Creation of STO
2 - Supplying plant ships materials... stock in transit
3 - Receiving plant receives materials
4 - Materials with defects -> Receiving plant add new line with return tick on the same material
5 - GI from Receiving plant... stock in transit
6 - Supplying plant receives materials -> Inspection lot has to be created
I used inspection type 08 on Receiving plant w/o success.
Many thanks.
Stéphane

No inspection lot is created when we return Materials to Vendor (Plant A) even if we maintain Inspection type 02.
Before STO customizing, Plant B creates a subcontracting purchase order. Next Materials are sending to Vendor (Plant A) and put in "Stock provided to vendor" (Transaction ME2O).
Vendor (Plant B) creates a Repair request (Sales document / Transaction VA01). Next run VRRE to reveice Materials to repair. Inspection lot is automatically created. The usage decision triggers the creation of Service order to manage all the repairing flow. Last step is to deliver Materials to Plant A and create Repair invoice.
Repair request supports all repairing flow (inspection lot, service oder...), especialy status (out of warranty or not).
After STO customizing, I expected the following result:
1° - Return STO to Vendor (Plant A) / ME21N with return tick
2° - Plant B ships Materials / MIGO wih 101 (SAP converts in 161)
3° - Stock in Transit
4° - Materials receive to Vendor (Plant B) / VL10B
5° - Creation Inspection lot
6° - UD triggered Service order creation
7° - ...Repairing flow with Service order...
8° - Materials ship to Plant B
9° - Repair invoice
10° - Stock in Transit
11° - Plant B receives Materials
As I said, there are 2 blocking points:
- Inspection lot not created when Vendor receives Materials
- Service order not created automatically (because no Repair request to support inspection lot, service order...)
Thanks a lot for your help.
Tell me if you have any questions.
Stéphane

Deletion of Shipment, Shipment Cost Document, aftr creation of ref. P.O,IR

Dear SAP Gurus,
I have a Scenario in my customer System.
the Scenario is as follows,
1) Creation of a Sales ORder
2) Delivery
3) Shipment
4) Shipment Cost (as the shipping is carried by a vendor, we capture the costs here)
5) With Reference to the Shipment cost, we create a Purchase Order
6) after the P.O , the IR
Current Situation :
The End user is able to delete the Shipment Cost and the Shipment Document even if the P.O is invoiced.
Requirement :
the Shipment and the shipment cost Documents shouldnt be deleted unless the IR is reversed for the P.O
Note * Is there a Configuration Possible for this requirement *
awaiting your Expert Comments
Many thanks in Advance.
Regards,
Santa Khattri.

FSKB G/L Account Posting
this transaction is not working

Creation of .ard file

hi all,
Can any body Suggest me regarding my .ard file creation . i am doing like this to create .ard file ie E:\Program Files\SAP\SAP Business One SDK\Tools\AddOnRegDataGen i am going this and creating my .ard file r else any other way to Create .ard file iam following for creation of .ard file other process for this ie when installation wizard running that coding Bin folder D:\Anoop\DEMO\B1AddOnInstallerNET1\B1AddOnInstallerNET1\AddOnRegDataGenFile in one Batch file is their but when iam running this Batch file i am n't getting the .ard file Can u plzz suggest me regarding Creationg this process how to approach this Can u solve this problem regarding this.
Regards
ANAND

Anand,
you can download the Business One Development Tools here:
SAP Business One Tools [original link is broken]
Also, there are recorded Business One Expert Sessions on SDN that demo the usage of our tools. Take a look at them and let me know if they help you understand this process better:
Recording 1:
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/softwaredownload?download=/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/com.sap.km.cm.docs/business_packages/a1-8-4/business_one_live_expert_sessions/on_sdn_articles_and_tools_for_add-on_development.zip
You can go to segment "Demo 1", which addresses this topic.
You can download the presentation for this WebEx here:
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/83138994-0e01-0010-428f-ae6e0af49449
Recording 2 (no in English, but still very good illustrating the creation of an Add-On):
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/softwaredownload?download=/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/com.sap.km.cm.docs/business_packages/a1-8-4/business_one_live_expert_sessions/b1de_b1te_add-ons_development_and_certification.zip
You can download the presentation for this WebEx here:
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/92af3198-0e01-0010-27aa-8859890672c9
If this helps answer your questions, please go ahead and close this thread.
Torsten Budesheim

Index creation failed in Business Objects Explorer

Hi,
I installed the Business Objects Explorer ...
But I can not index anything.
When I try to index the following message appears:
"Server, DRWBI001.PolestarIndexing, generated messages The Following:
Index creation failed. File system Polestar exceptions occurred on the server. Search for Polestar ERROR Within the servers log file for more details. (Can not create directory C: \ Program Files \ Business Objects \ BusinessObjects Enterprise 12.0 \ win32_x86 \ \ Index \ DRWBI001.PolestarIndexing \ InProgress \ ExplorationIndexes \ 35e98114-4831-A254-8dad-497fd3d4bb26 \-30_10.09.41 2010-06. 564) "
What should I do? help me please

I do not have UNIVERSE.
I'm trying to index files like Microsoft excel.
I have to do some configuration in the CMC to be able to crawl in Business Objects Explorer?
What should I do to crawl in Business Objects Explorer?

Error Message: Creation of Temporary Table "#BIMC_SETS" not possible

Hello,
I am trying to get data from HANA Virtual Data Model (VDM) from MDX connection in MS Excel. The VDM Views and models are visitble after the connection is successfully made.
But when I try to fetch the data, I get the following error:
"Creation of Temporary Table "BIMC_SETS" is not possible".
Can someone let me know how to resolve this?
Best regards,
Akhil

Hi Lars,
I am getting the same error. We are trying to build a role for Adhoc reporting. The role has analytic privilege, object privilege with select on individual models in _SYS_BIC (models we want to expose and part of AP), object privilege on _SYS_BI with select and execute and also object privilege execute on REPOSITORY_REST.
I am able to execute the models using Lumira and Analysis for excel, however getting error with MDX connection.
Also we want to try and restrict direct ODBC access to HANA using query from excel. With the above privileges user is able to see all the M_ views and get data for it. Can we restrict this?
We are on SP6 rev 67.
Thanks,
Aamod

"Creation of login object failed" after MAS generation

Hi everybody,
I am working on CRM Mobile Sales 5.0 SP6. I have performed the initial generation with the .NET Application Studio. It gave me 6 errors and some warnings. Now when I tried to logon my mobile client I 've got following error:
"Creation of login object failed".
Visual Studio is installed on partition "C:\Program Files\" and Mobile Sales on "D:\SAP\"
Has someone any ideas? Thanks in advance,
Mirko

Hi Mirko!
In your app you're calling unknown data structures. While generating the "compiler" read the names and want to create the relevant structures but the necessary data to do this are missing. You have to start fist the client console doing a complete meta data generation. If this runs without error your generation inside the studio will succeed, too.
BTW: In your first posting you've written "D:SAP..." and in your last the error-message was "D:ProgrammeSAP..."...
Perhaps different settings?
Do you have made already a successful generation with the actual installation?
Good luck,
Ingo
Message was edited by:
Ingo Schmökel

PIR creation for Configurable material

Hi,
Please let me know, the process for creating PIR's for a configurable material.
Currently my client is using Stategy 82 for creation of prodcution order directly from sales order and does the selection of characteristics while creating the sales order.
when i try to create PIR using MD61,the system is giving a error " No Planning Profile maintained".
please help me out with the steps to be followed for creation of PIR's.
Regards
Ramesh

Hi,
you can not create PIR in MD61 with planning strategy 82. it is MTO stategy.
If you want to plan for configurable materials, go for characteristic plannijg strategy like 56.
In characteristic planning you need to maintain option (characteristics) usage % in MD61. In addtion to configurable profile it also needs planning profile 9 where you need to maintina exact characterisrics for whome option % should be maintinaed in MD61).
If you dont include certain charcteristics from configurable profile in planning profile then they will not be planned in Md61.
Check Charcteristic planning at below link:
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_470/helpdata/en/75/504853a39a11d191930000e8a5f6e6/content.htm

Identifying follow up creation in CIC

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for