Idle Session Performance issue
Hi,
Just want to know if there are session that are idle can create any kind of performance issue.
Regards,
Vikas
Vikas Kohli wrote:
Hi,
Just want to know if there are session that are idle can create any kind of performance issue.
Can you get something for nothing?
Idle session does consume "some" resources.
Does any consumed resource impact performance?
By which metric at what value is considered any kind of performance issue?
Similar Messages
-
Synchronized session performance issue with Linux
Hi,
I have some code (in a Struts Action) that streams out a BufferedImage object from a user's session object and then removes it.
I remove the BufferedImage object from session in a synchronized block.
When testing on my Windows 2000 laptop performance is fantastic, however, when I scale up to our Linux test servers, it is much slower, 5 secs. compared to 1 sec. before.
Both platforms running identical JVMs and versions of Tomcat - anyone else experience this?
Best RegardsThe fact that the block is synchronized should not impact performance unless multiple clients access the same session (and I don't see how that could happen). What object are you synchronizing on?
How big is the BufferedImage? How are you testing the application? You say you are streaming the image as output -- do you test with a web browser pointing at localhost in both cases? A large BufferedImage being transferred over the ethernet as opposed to the local loopback would certainly cause the extra delay you're seeing. What are the specs of your Win2k laptop and Linux test servers? You really need to do more investigation before you start making claims like "Java is slower on Linux than Windows" (which is effectively what you're suggesting). -
Performance issue showing read by other session Event
Hi All,
we are having a severe performance issue in my database when we are running batch jobs.
This was a new database(11.2.0.2) and we are testing the performance by running some batch jobs. These batch jobs included some inserts and updates.
I am seeing read by other session in top 5 timed events and cache buffers chains in Latch Miss Sources section.
Please help me to solve this out.
Inst Num Startup Time Release RAC
1 27-Feb-12 09:03 11.2.0.2.0 NO
Platform CPUs Cores Sockets Memory(GB)
Linux x86 64-bit 8 8 8 48.00
Snap Id Snap Time Sessions Curs/Sess
Begin Snap: 5605 29-Feb-12 03:00:27 63 4.5
End Snap: 5614 29-Feb-12 12:00:47 63 4.3
Elapsed: 540.32 (mins)
DB Time: 1,774.23 (mins)
Cache Sizes Begin End
~~~~~~~~~~~ ---------- ----------
Buffer Cache: 1,952M 1,952M Std Block Size: 16K
Shared Pool Size: 1,024M 1,024M Log Buffer: 18,868K
Load Profile Per Second Per Transaction Per Exec Per Call
~~~~~~~~~~~~ --------------- --------------- ---------- ----------
DB Time(s): 3.3 0.8 0.02 0.05
DB CPU(s): 1.1 0.3 0.01 0.02
Redo size: 55,763.8 13,849.3
Logical reads: 23,906.6 5,937.4
Block changes: 325.7 80.9
Physical reads: 665.6 165.3
Physical writes: 40.4 10.0
User calls: 60.7 15.1
Parses: 10.6 2.6
Hard parses: 1.1 0.3
W/A MB processed: 0.6 0.2
Logons: 0.1 0.0
Executes: 151.2 37.6
Rollbacks: 0.0 0.0
Transactions: 4.0
Instance Efficiency Percentages (Target 100%)
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Buffer Nowait %: 99.94 Redo NoWait %: 100.00
Buffer Hit %: 97.90 In-memory Sort %: 100.00
Library Hit %: 98.06 Soft Parse %: 90.16
Execute to Parse %: 92.96 Latch Hit %: 100.00
Parse CPU to Parse Elapsd %: 76.71 % Non-Parse CPU: 98.57
Shared Pool Statistics Begin End
Memory Usage %: 89.38 87.96
% SQL with executions>1: 97.14 95.15
% Memory for SQL w/exec>1: 96.05 92.46
Top 5 Timed Foreground Events
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Avg
wait % DB
Event Waits Time(s) (ms) time Wait Class
db file sequential read 14,092,706 65,613 5 61.6 User I/O
DB CPU 34,819 32.7
read by other session 308,534 1,260 4 1.2 User I/O
direct path read 97,454 987 10 .9 User I/O
db file scattered read 71,870 910 13 .9 User I/O
Host CPU (CPUs: 8 Cores: 8 Sockets: 8)
~~~~~~~~ Load Average
Begin End %User %System %WIO %Idle
0.43 0.36 13.7 0.6 9.7 85.7
Instance CPU
~~~~~~~~~~~~
% of total CPU for Instance: 13.5
% of busy CPU for Instance: 94.2
%DB time waiting for CPU - Resource Mgr: 0.0
Memory Statistics
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Begin End
Host Mem (MB): 49,152.0 49,152.0
SGA use (MB): 3,072.0 3,072.0
PGA use (MB): 506.5 629.1
% Host Mem used for SGA+PGA: 7.28 7.53
Time Model Statistics
-> Total time in database user-calls (DB Time): 106453.8s
-> Statistics including the word "background" measure background process
time, and so do not contribute to the DB time statistic
-> Ordered by % or DB time desc, Statistic name
Statistic Name Time (s) % of DB Time
sql execute elapsed time 105,531.1 99.1
DB CPU 34,818.8 32.7
parse time elapsed 714.7 .7
hard parse elapsed time 684.8 .6
PL/SQL execution elapsed time 161.9 .2
PL/SQL compilation elapsed time 44.2 .0
connection management call elapsed time 16.9 .0
hard parse (sharing criteria) elapsed time 10.2 .0
hard parse (bind mismatch) elapsed time 9.4 .0
sequence load elapsed time 2.9 .0
repeated bind elapsed time 0.5 .0
failed parse elapsed time 0.0 .0
DB time 106,453.8
background elapsed time 1,753.9
background cpu time 61.7
Operating System Statistics
-> *TIME statistic values are diffed.
All others display actual values. End Value is displayed if different
-> ordered by statistic type (CPU Use, Virtual Memory, Hardware Config), Name
Statistic Value End Value
BUSY_TIME 3,704,415
IDLE_TIME 22,203,740
IOWAIT_TIME 2,517,864
NICE_TIME 3
SYS_TIME 145,696
USER_TIME 3,557,758
LOAD 0 0
RSRC_MGR_CPU_WAIT_TIME 0
VM_IN_BYTES 358,813,045,760
VM_OUT_BYTES 29,514,830,848
PHYSICAL_MEMORY_BYTES 51,539,607,552
NUM_CPUS 8
NUM_CPU_CORES 8
NUM_CPU_SOCKETS 8
GLOBAL_RECEIVE_SIZE_MAX 4,194,304
GLOBAL_SEND_SIZE_MAX 1,048,586
TCP_RECEIVE_SIZE_DEFAULT 87,380
TCP_RECEIVE_SIZE_MAX 4,194,304
TCP_RECEIVE_SIZE_MIN 4,096
TCP_SEND_SIZE_DEFAULT 16,384
TCP_SEND_SIZE_MAX 4,194,304
TCP_SEND_SIZE_MIN 4,096
Operating System Statistics -
Snap Time Load %busy %user %sys %idle %iowait
29-Feb 03:00:27 0.4 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
29-Feb 04:00:35 1.4 11.9 11.2 0.6 88.1 14.3
29-Feb 05:00:41 1.7 13.8 13.2 0.6 86.2 15.8
29-Feb 06:00:48 1.5 14.0 13.5 0.6 86.0 12.3
29-Feb 07:01:00 1.8 16.3 15.8 0.5 83.7 10.4
29-Feb 08:00:12 2.6 23.2 22.5 0.6 76.8 12.6
29-Feb 09:00:26 1.3 16.6 16.0 0.5 83.4 5.7
29-Feb 10:00:33 1.2 13.8 13.3 0.5 86.2 2.0
29-Feb 11:00:43 1.3 14.5 14.0 0.5 85.5 3.8
29-Feb 12:00:47 0.4 4.9 4.2 0.7 95.1 10.6
Foreground Wait Class
-> s - second, ms - millisecond - 1000th of a second
-> ordered by wait time desc, waits desc
-> %Timeouts: value of 0 indicates value was < .5%. Value of null is truly 0
-> Captured Time accounts for 97.9% of Total DB time 106,453.79 (s)
-> Total FG Wait Time: 69,415.64 (s) DB CPU time: 34,818.79 (s)
Avg
%Time Total Wait wait
Wait Class Waits -outs Time (s) (ms) %DB time
User I/O 14,693,843 0 69,222 5 65.0
DB CPU 34,819 32.7
Commit 40,629 0 119 3 0.1
System I/O 26,504 0 57 2 0.1
Network 1,945,010 0 11 0 0.0
Other 125,200 99 4 0 0.0
Application 2,673 0 2 1 0.0
Concurrency 3,059 0 1 0 0.0
Configuration 31 19 0 15 0.0
Foreground Wait Events
-> s - second, ms - millisecond - 1000th of a second
-> Only events with Total Wait Time (s) >= .001 are shown
-> ordered by wait time desc, waits desc (idle events last)
-> %Timeouts: value of 0 indicates value was < .5%. Value of null is truly 0
Avg
%Time Total Wait wait Waits % DB
Event Waits -outs Time (s) (ms) /txn time
db file sequential read 14,092,706 0 65,613 5 108.0 61.6
read by other session 308,534 0 1,260 4 2.4 1.2
direct path read 97,454 0 987 10 0.7 .9
db file scattered read 71,870 0 910 13 0.6 .9
db file parallel read 35,001 0 372 11 0.3 .3
log file sync 40,629 0 119 3 0.3 .1
control file sequential re 26,504 0 57 2 0.2 .1
direct path read temp 14,499 0 49 3 0.1 .0
direct path write temp 9,186 0 28 3 0.1 .0
SQL*Net message to client 1,923,973 0 5 0 14.7 .0
SQL*Net message from dblin 1,056 0 5 5 0.0 .0
Disk file operations I/O 8,848 0 2 0 0.1 .0
ASM file metadata operatio 36 0 2 54 0.0 .0
SQL*Net break/reset to cli 2,636 0 1 1 0.0 .0
ADR block file read 472 0 1 1 0.0 .0
os thread startup 8 0 1 74 0.0 .0
SQL*Net more data to clien 17,656 0 1 0 0.1 .0
asynch descriptor resize 123,852 100 0 0 0.9 .0
local write wait 110 0 0 4 0.0 .0
utl_file I/O 55,635 0 0 0 0.4 .0
log file switch (private s 8 0 0 52 0.0 .0
cursor: pin S wait on X 2 0 0 142 0.0 .0
enq: KO - fast object chec 13 0 0 20 0.0 .0
PX Deq: Slave Session Stat 248 0 0 1 0.0 .0
enq: RO - fast object reus 18 0 0 11 0.0 .0
latch: cache buffers chain 2,511 0 0 0 0.0 .0
latch: shared pool 195 0 0 1 0.0 .0
CSS initialization 12 0 0 8 0.0 .0
PX qref latch 54 100 0 2 0.0 .0
SQL*Net more data from cli 995 0 0 0 0.0 .0
SQL*Net more data from dbl 300 0 0 0 0.0 .0
kksfbc child completion 1 100 0 56 0.0 .0
library cache: mutex X 244 0 0 0 0.0 .0
PX Deq: Signal ACK RSG 124 0 0 0 0.0 .0
undo segment extension 6 100 0 7 0.0 .0
PX Deq: Signal ACK EXT 124 0 0 0 0.0 .0
library cache load lock 3 0 0 9 0.0 .0
ADR block file write 45 0 0 1 0.0 .0
CSS operation: action 12 0 0 2 0.0 .0
reliable message 28 0 0 1 0.0 .0
CSS operation: query 72 0 0 0 0.0 .0
latch: row cache objects 14 0 0 1 0.0 .0
enq: SQ - contention 17 0 0 0 0.0 .0
latch free 32 0 0 0 0.0 .0
buffer busy waits 52 0 0 0 0.0 .0
enq: PS - contention 16 0 0 0 0.0 .0
enq: TX - row lock content 6 0 0 1 0.0 .0
SQL*Net message to dblink 1,018 0 0 0 0.0 .0
cursor: pin S 23 0 0 0 0.0 .0
latch: cache buffers lru c 8 0 0 0 0.0 .0
SQL*Net message from clien 1,923,970 0 944,508 491 14.7
jobq slave wait 66,732 100 33,334 500 0.5
Streams AQ: waiting for me 6,481 100 32,412 5001 0.0
wait for unread message on 32,858 98 32,411 986 0.3
PX Deq: Execution Msg 1,448 0 190 131 0.0
PX Deq: Execute Reply 1,196 0 74 62 0.0
HS message to agent 228 0 4 19 0.0
single-task message 42 0 4 97 0.0
PX Deq Credit: send blkd 904 0 2 3 0.0
PX Deq Credit: need buffer 205 0 1 3 0.0
Foreground Wait Events
-> s - second, ms - millisecond - 1000th of a second
-> Only events with Total Wait Time (s) >= .001 are shown
-> ordered by wait time desc, waits desc (idle events last)
-> %Timeouts: value of 0 indicates value was < .5%. Value of null is truly 0
Avg
%Time Total Wait wait Waits % DB
Event Waits -outs Time (s) (ms) /txn time
PX Deq: Table Q Normal 4,291 0 1 0 0.0
PX Deq: Join ACK 124 0 0 1 0.0
PX Deq: Parse Reply 124 0 0 0 0.0
KSV master wait 256 0 0 0 0.0
Latch Miss Sources
-> only latches with sleeps are shown
-> ordered by name, sleeps desc
NoWait Waiter
Latch Name Where Misses Sleeps Sleeps
ASM map operation freeli kffmTranslate2 0 2 0
DML lock allocation ktadmc 0 2 0
FOB s.o list latch ksfd_allfob 0 2 2
In memory undo latch ktiFlushMe 0 5 0
In memory undo latch ktichg: child 0 3 0
PC and Classifier lists No latch 0 6 0
Real-time plan statistic keswxAddNewPlanEntry 0 20 20
SQL memory manager worka qesmmIRegisterWorkArea:1 0 1 1
active service list kswslogon: session logout 0 23 12
active service list kswssetsvc: PX session swi 0 6 1
active service list kswsite: service iterator 0 1 0
archive process latch kcrrgpll 0 3 3
cache buffers chains kcbgtcr_2 0 1,746 573
cache buffers chains kcbgtcr: fast path (cr pin 0 1,024 2,126
cache buffers chains kcbgcur_2 0 60 8
cache buffers chains kcbchg1: kslbegin: bufs no 0 16 3
cache buffers chains kcbgtcr: fast path 0 14 20
cache buffers chains kcbzibmlt: multi-block rea 0 10 0
cache buffers chains kcbrls_2 0 9 53
cache buffers chains kcbgtcr: kslbegin shared 0 8 1
cache buffers chains kcbrls_1 0 7 84
cache buffers chains kcbgtcr: kslbegin excl 0 6 14
cache buffers chains kcbnew: new latch again 0 6 0
cache buffers chains kcbzgb: scan from tail. no 0 6 0
cache buffers chains kcbzwb 0 5 8
cache buffers chains kcbgcur: fast path (shr) 0 3 0
cache buffers chains kcbget: pin buffer 0 3 0
cache buffers chains kcbzhngcbk2_1 0 1 0
cache buffers lru chain kcbzgws 0 19 0
cache buffers lru chain kcbo_link_q 0 3 0
call allocation ksuxds 0 14 10
call allocation ksudlp: top call 0 2 3
enqueue hash chains ksqgtl3 0 2 1
enqueue hash chains ksqrcl 0 1 2
enqueues ksqgel: create enqueue 0 1 0
object queue header oper kcbo_unlink_q 0 5 2
object queue header oper kcbo_sw_buf 0 2 0
object queue header oper kcbo_link_q 0 1 2
object queue header oper kcbo_switch_cq 0 1 2
object queue header oper kcbo_switch_mq_bg 0 1 4
parallel query alloc buf kxfpbalo 0 1 1
process allocation ksucrp:1 0 2 0
process queue reference kxfpqrsnd 0 1 0
qmn task queue latch kwqmnmvtsks: delay to read 0 1 0
redo allocation kcrfw_redo_gen: redo alloc 0 17 0
row cache objects kqreqd: reget 0 6 0
row cache objects kqrpre: find obj 0 6 13
row cache objects kqrso 0 2 0
row cache objects kqreqd 0 1 2
row cache objects kqrpre: init complete 0 1 1
shared pool kghalo 0 199 106
shared pool kghupr1 0 39 109
shared pool kghfre 0 18 19
shared pool kghalp 0 7 29
space background task la ktsj_grab_task 0 21 27
Mutex Sleep Summary
-> ordered by number of sleeps desc
Wait
Mutex Type Location Sleeps Time (ms)
Library Cache kglhdgn2 106 338 12
Library Cache kgllkc1 57 259 10
Library Cache kgllkdl1 85 123 21
Cursor Pin kkslce [KKSCHLPIN2] 70 286
Library Cache kglget2 2 31 1
Library Cache kglhdgn1 62 31 2
Library Cache kglpin1 4 26 1
Library Cache kglpnal1 90 18 0
Library Cache kglpndl1 95 15 2
Library Cache kgllldl2 112 6 0
Library Cache kglini1 32 1 0
-------------------------------------------------------------Thanks in advance.Hi,
Thanks for reply.
I provided one hour report.
Inst Num Startup Time Release RAC
1 27-Feb-12 09:03 11.2.0.2.0 NO
Platform CPUs Cores Sockets Memory(GB)
Linux x86 64-bit 8 8 8 48.00
Snap Id Snap Time Sessions Curs/Sess
Begin Snap: 5606 29-Feb-12 04:00:35 63 3.7
End Snap: 5607 29-Feb-12 05:00:41 63 3.6
Elapsed: 60.11 (mins)
DB Time: 382.67 (mins)
Cache Sizes Begin End
~~~~~~~~~~~ ---------- ----------
Buffer Cache: 1,952M 1,952M Std Block Size: 16K
Shared Pool Size: 1,024M 1,024M Log Buffer: 18,868K
Load Profile Per Second Per Transaction Per Exec Per Call
~~~~~~~~~~~~ --------------- --------------- ---------- ----------
DB Time(s): 6.4 0.8 0.03 0.03
DB CPU(s): 1.0 0.1 0.00 0.00
Redo size: 84,539.3 10,425.6
Logical reads: 23,345.6 2,879.1
Block changes: 386.5 47.7
Physical reads: 1,605.0 197.9
Physical writes: 7.1 0.9
User calls: 233.9 28.9
Parses: 4.0 0.5
Hard parses: 0.1 0.0
W/A MB processed: 0.1 0.0
Logons: 0.1 0.0
Executes: 210.9 26.0
Rollbacks: 0.0 0.0
Transactions: 8.1
Instance Efficiency Percentages (Target 100%)
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Buffer Nowait %: 99.62 Redo NoWait %: 100.00
Buffer Hit %: 95.57 In-memory Sort %: 100.00
Library Hit %: 99.90 Soft Parse %: 98.68
Execute to Parse %: 98.10 Latch Hit %: 99.99
Parse CPU to Parse Elapsd %: 32.08 % Non-Parse CPU: 99.90
Shared Pool Statistics Begin End
Memory Usage %: 89.25 89.45
% SQL with executions>1: 96.79 97.52
% Memory for SQL w/exec>1: 95.67 96.56
Top 5 Timed Foreground Events
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Avg
wait % DB
Event Waits Time(s) (ms) time Wait Class
db file sequential read 3,054,464 17,002 6 74.0 User I/O
DB CPU 3,748 16.3
read by other session 199,603 796 4 3.5 User I/O
direct path read 46,301 439 9 1.9 User I/O
db file scattered read 21,113 269 13 1.2 User I/O
Host CPU (CPUs: 8 Cores: 8 Sockets: 8)
~~~~~~~~ Load Average
Begin End %User %System %WIO %Idle
1.45 1.67 13.2 0.6 15.8 86.2
Instance CPU
~~~~~~~~~~~~
% of total CPU for Instance: 13.0
% of busy CPU for Instance: 94.7
%DB time waiting for CPU - Resource Mgr: 0.0
Memory Statistics
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Begin End
Host Mem (MB): 49,152.0 49,152.0
SGA use (MB): 3,072.0 3,072.0
PGA use (MB): 513.5 467.7
% Host Mem used for SGA+PGA: 7.29 7.20
Time Model Statistics
-> Total time in database user-calls (DB Time): 22960.5s
-> Statistics including the word "background" measure background process
time, and so do not contribute to the DB time statistic
-> Ordered by % or DB time desc, Statistic name
Statistic Name Time (s) % of DB Time
sql execute elapsed time 22,835.9 99.5
DB CPU 3,748.4 16.3
parse time elapsed 15.4 .1
hard parse elapsed time 14.3 .1
PL/SQL execution elapsed time 7.5 .0
PL/SQL compilation elapsed time 6.0 .0
connection management call elapsed time 1.6 .0
sequence load elapsed time 0.4 .0
hard parse (sharing criteria) elapsed time 0.0 .0
repeated bind elapsed time 0.0 .0
failed parse elapsed time 0.0 .0
DB time 22,960.5
background elapsed time 238.1
background cpu time 4.9
Operating System Statistics
-> *TIME statistic values are diffed.
All others display actual values. End Value is displayed if different
-> ordered by statistic type (CPU Use, Virtual Memory, Hardware Config), Name
Statistic Value End Value
BUSY_TIME 396,506
IDLE_TIME 2,483,725
IOWAIT_TIME 455,495
NICE_TIME 0
SYS_TIME 16,163
USER_TIME 380,052
LOAD 1 2
RSRC_MGR_CPU_WAIT_TIME 0
VM_IN_BYTES 95,646,943,232
VM_OUT_BYTES 1,686,059,008
PHYSICAL_MEMORY_BYTES 51,539,607,552
NUM_CPUS 8
NUM_CPU_CORES 8
NUM_CPU_SOCKETS 8
GLOBAL_RECEIVE_SIZE_MAX 4,194,304
GLOBAL_SEND_SIZE_MAX 1,048,586
TCP_RECEIVE_SIZE_DEFAULT 87,380
TCP_RECEIVE_SIZE_MAX 4,194,304
TCP_RECEIVE_SIZE_MIN 4,096
TCP_SEND_SIZE_DEFAULT 16,384
TCP_SEND_SIZE_MAX 4,194,304
TCP_SEND_SIZE_MIN 4,096
Operating System Statistics -
Snap Time Load %busy %user %sys %idle %iowait
29-Feb 04:00:35 1.4 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
29-Feb 05:00:41 1.7 13.8 13.2 0.6 86.2 15.8
Foreground Wait Class
-> s - second, ms - millisecond - 1000th of a second
-> ordered by wait time desc, waits desc
-> %Timeouts: value of 0 indicates value was < .5%. Value of null is truly 0
-> Captured Time accounts for 97.6% of Total DB time 22,960.46 (s)
-> Total FG Wait Time: 18,651.75 (s) DB CPU time: 3,748.35 (s)
Avg
%Time Total Wait wait
Wait Class Waits -outs Time (s) (ms) %DB time
User I/O 3,327,253 0 18,576 6 80.9
DB CPU 3,748 16.3
Commit 23,882 0 69 3 0.3
System I/O 1,035 0 3 3 0.0
Network 842,393 0 2 0 0.0
Other 10,120 99 0 0 0.0
Configuration 3 0 0 58 0.0
Application 264 0 0 1 0.0
Concurrency 1,482 0 0 0 0.0
Foreground Wait Events
-> s - second, ms - millisecond - 1000th of a second
-> Only events with Total Wait Time (s) >= .001 are shown
-> ordered by wait time desc, waits desc (idle events last)
-> %Timeouts: value of 0 indicates value was < .5%. Value of null is truly 0
Avg
%Time Total Wait wait Waits % DB
Event Waits -outs Time (s) (ms) /txn time
db file sequential read 3,054,464 0 17,002 6 104.5 74.0
read by other session 199,603 0 796 4 6.8 3.5
direct path read 46,301 0 439 9 1.6 1.9
db file scattered read 21,113 0 269 13 0.7 1.2
log file sync 23,882 0 69 3 0.8 .3
db file parallel read 4,727 0 68 14 0.2 .3
control file sequential re 1,035 0 3 3 0.0 .0
SQL*Net message to client 840,792 0 2 0 28.8 .0
direct path read temp 95 0 2 18 0.0 .0
local write wait 79 0 0 4 0.0 .0
Disk file operations I/O 870 0 0 0 0.0 .0
ASM file metadata operatio 4 0 0 50 0.0 .0
log file switch (private s 3 0 0 58 0.0 .0
ADR block file read 36 0 0 3 0.0 .0
enq: RO - fast object reus 5 0 0 16 0.0 .0
latch: cache buffers chain 1,465 0 0 0 0.1 .0
SQL*Net break/reset to cli 256 0 0 0 0.0 .0
asynch descriptor resize 10,059 100 0 0 0.3 .0
SQL*Net more data to clien 1,510 0 0 0 0.1 .0
enq: KO - fast object chec 3 0 0 8 0.0 .0
SQL*Net more data from cli 91 0 0 0 0.0 .0
latch: shared pool 14 0 0 0 0.0 .0
ADR block file write 5 0 0 1 0.0 .0
reliable message 8 0 0 0 0.0 .0
direct path write temp 1 0 0 2 0.0 .0
SQL*Net message from clien 840,794 0 68,885 82 28.8
jobq slave wait 7,365 100 3,679 499 0.3
Streams AQ: waiting for me 721 100 3,605 5000 0.0
wait for unread message on 3,648 98 3,603 988 0.1
KSV master wait 20 0 0 0 0.0
Background Wait Events
-> ordered by wait time desc, waits desc (idle events last)
-> Only events with Total Wait Time (s) >= .001 are shown
-> %Timeouts: value of 0 indicates value was < .5%. Value of null is truly 0
Avg
%Time Total Wait wait Waits % bg
Event Waits -outs Time (s) (ms) /txn time
log file parallel write 29,353 0 83 3 1.0 34.8
db file parallel write 5,753 0 17 3 0.2 6.9
db file sequential read 1,638 0 15 9 0.1 6.1
control file sequential re 5,142 0 13 2 0.2 5.4
os thread startup 140 0 8 58 0.0 3.4
control file parallel writ 1,440 0 8 6 0.0 3.4
log file sequential read 304 0 8 26 0.0 3.3
db file scattered read 214 0 2 9 0.0 .8
ASM file metadata operatio 1,199 0 1 1 0.0 .3
direct path write 35 0 0 6 0.0 .1
direct path read 41 0 0 5 0.0 .1
kfk: async disk IO 6 0 0 9 0.0 .0
Disk file operations I/O 1,266 0 0 0 0.0 .0
ADR block file read 16 0 0 2 0.0 .0
read by other session 3 0 0 8 0.0 .0
Log archive I/O 2 0 0 10 0.0 .0
log file sync 3 0 0 5 0.0 .0
asynch descriptor resize 341 100 0 0 0.0 .0
CSS initialization 1 0 0 6 0.0 .0
log file single write 4 0 0 1 0.0 .0
latch: redo allocation 3 0 0 1 0.0 .0
ADR block file write 5 0 0 1 0.0 .0
LGWR wait for redo copy 45 0 0 0 0.0 .0
CSS operation: query 6 0 0 0 0.0 .0
CSS operation: action 1 0 0 1 0.0 .0
SQL*Net message to client 420 0 0 0 0.0 .0
rdbms ipc message 47,816 39 61,046 1277 1.6
DIAG idle wait 7,200 100 7,200 1000 0.2
Space Manager: slave idle 1,146 98 5,674 4951 0.0
class slave wait 284 0 3,983 14026 0.0
dispatcher timer 61 100 3,660 60006 0.0
Streams AQ: qmn coordinato 258 50 3,613 14003 0.0
Streams AQ: qmn slave idle 130 0 3,613 27789 0.0
Streams AQ: waiting for ti 7 71 3,608 515430 0.0
wait for unread message on 3,605 100 3,606 1000 0.1
pmon timer 1,201 100 3,604 3001 0.0
smon timer 15 73 3,603 240207 0.0
ASM background timer 754 0 3,602 4777 0.0
shared server idle wait 120 100 3,601 30006 0.0
SQL*Net message from clien 554 0 4 7 0.0
KSV master wait 101 0 0 2 0.0
Wait Event Histogram
-> Units for Total Waits column: K is 1000, M is 1000000, G is 1000000000
-> % of Waits: value of .0 indicates value was <.05%; value of null is truly 0
-> % of Waits: column heading of <=1s is truly <1024ms, >1s is truly >=1024ms
-> Ordered by Event (idle events last)
% of Waits
Total
Event Waits <1ms <2ms <4ms <8ms <16ms <32ms <=1s >1s
ADR block file read 52 73.1 1.9 9.6 13.5 1.9
ADR block file write 10 100.0
ADR file lock 12 100.0
ARCH wait for archivelog l 3 100.0
ASM file metadata operatio 1203 97.3 .5 .7 .3 .2 .9
CSS initialization 1 100.0
CSS operation: action 1 100.0
CSS operation: query 6 83.3 16.7
Disk file operations I/O 2118 95.4 4.5 .1
LGWR wait for redo copy 45 100.0
Log archive I/O 2 100.0
SQL*Net break/reset to cli 256 99.6 .4
SQL*Net message to client 839.9 100.0 .0
SQL*Net more data from cli 91 100.0
SQL*Net more data to clien 1503 100.0
asynch descriptor resize 10.4K 100.0
buffer busy waits 2 100.0
control file parallel writ 1440 5.7 35.1 24.0 16.3 12.0 5.5 1.5
control file sequential re 6177 69.4 7.5 5.9 8.1 7.1 1.7 .3
db file parallel read 4727 1.7 3.2 3.2 10.1 46.6 33.3 1.8
db file parallel write 5755 42.3 21.3 18.6 11.2 4.6 1.4 .5
db file scattered read 21.5K 8.4 4.3 11.9 18.9 26.3 25.3 4.9
db file sequential read 3053. 28.7 15.1 11.1 17.9 21.5 5.4 .3 .0
direct path read 46.3K 9.9 8.8 18.5 21.7 22.8 15.7 2.7
direct path read temp 95 9.5 9.5 23.2 49.5 8.4
direct path write 35 11.4 31.4 17.1 22.9 11.4 2.9 2.9
direct path write temp 1 100.0
enq: KO - fast object chec 3 66.7 33.3
enq: RO - fast object reus 5 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0
kfk: async disk IO 6 50.0 16.7 16.7 16.7
latch free 3 100.0
latch: cache buffers chain 1465 100.0
latch: cache buffers lru c 1 100.0
latch: object queue header 2 100.0
latch: redo allocation 3 33.3 33.3 33.3
latch: row cache objects 2 100.0
latch: shared pool 15 93.3 6.7
local write wait 79 35.4 34.2 21.5 8.9
log file parallel write 29.4K 47.8 21.7 11.9 9.9 6.8 1.6 .3
log file sequential read 304 6.3 3.0 3.6 10.2 23.4 24.3 29.3
log file single write 4 25.0 75.0
log file switch (private s 3 100.0
log file sync 23.9K 40.9 28.0 12.9 9.7 6.7 1.5 .3
os thread startup 140 100.0
read by other session 199.6 37.1 19.9 12.9 13.1 13.8 3.1 .2
reliable message 8 100.0
ASM background timer 755 2.9 .4 .1 .1 .3 .1 .3 95.8
DIAG idle wait 7196 100.0
KSV master wait 121 88.4 2.5 3.3 2.5 .8 .8 1.7
SQL*Net message from clien 840.1 97.1 1.8 .5 .2 .2 .1 .0 .1
Space Manager: slave idle 1147 .1 .5 99.4
Streams AQ: qmn coordinato 258 49.6 .4 50.0
Streams AQ: qmn slave idle 130 .8 99.2
Streams AQ: waiting for me 721 100.0
Streams AQ: waiting for ti 7 28.6 42.9 28.6
class slave wait 283 39.9 2.5 2.5 3.5 4.9 9.2 15.2 22.3
dispatcher timer 60 100.0
jobq slave wait 7360 .0 .0 .0 99.9
pmon timer 1201 100.0
rdbms ipc message 47.8K 2.7 31.6 17.4 1.1 1.1 .9 20.9 24.3
Wait Event Histogram DB/Inst: I2KPROD/I2KPROD Snaps: 5606-5607
-> Units for Total Waits column: K is 1000, M is 1000000, G is 1000000000
-> % of Waits: value of .0 indicates value was <.05%; value of null is truly 0
-> % of Waits: column heading of <=1s is truly <1024ms, >1s is truly >=1024ms
-> Ordered by Event (idle events last)
% of Waits
Total
Event Waits <1ms <2ms <4ms <8ms <16ms <32ms <=1s >1s
shared server idle wait 120 100.0
smon timer 16 6.3 93.8
wait for unread message on 7250 .1 99.9
Latch Miss Sources
-> only latches with sleeps are shown
-> ordered by name, sleeps desc
NoWait Waiter
Latch Name Where Misses Sleeps Sleeps
In memory undo latch ktichg: child 0 1 0
active service list kswslogon: session logout 0 2 0
cache buffers chains kcbgtcr_2 0 1,123 483
cache buffers chains kcbgtcr: fast path (cr pin 0 496 1,131
cache buffers chains kcbrls_2 0 5 6
cache buffers chains kcbgcur_2 0 4 0
cache buffers chains kcbgtcr: fast path 0 3 1
cache buffers chains kcbzwb 0 2 4
cache buffers chains kcbchg1: kslbegin: bufs no 0 1 0
cache buffers chains kcbnew: new latch again 0 1 0
cache buffers chains kcbrls_1 0 1 6
cache buffers chains kcbzgb: scan from tail. no 0 1 0
cache buffers lru chain kcbzgws 0 1 0
object queue header oper kcbo_switch_cq 0 1 0
object queue header oper kcbo_switch_mq_bg 0 1 2
redo allocation kcrfw_redo_gen: redo alloc 0 3 0
row cache objects kqrpre: find obj 0 1 1
row cache objects kqrso 0 1 0
shared pool kghalo 0 13 3
shared pool kghupr1 0 4 15
shared pool kghalp 0 1 0
space background task la ktsj_grab_task 0 2 2
------------------------------------------------------------- -
Performance issue session or bean?
hi,
i have a doubt regarding performance issue.
actually in my application, five jsp' s need to communicate each other. They share around 15 String Objects.
1. So right now i am using Session object to store
these 15 String objects.
2. Also my application can declare a class to
store all these 15 String objects as attributes and
then use <jsp:usebean> tag for communication
with session scope.
So now we have two methods for sharing information
in jsp application as stated above.
Can anyone help me which is the best method to follow as given above and why. Which does increase or decrease the web server load.
Thanks in advance.
Have a nice day.
Bye
SureshI'd go for wrapping up the data in a single object...not for any performance issues, just because it's far tidier.
As for performance, I doubt there is much difference although by wrapping up the data in one object you only have to call the session object once to get a handle on all 15 strings. -
Sun ONE 6.1 Performance Issues - Sleeping / Hanging
We have been running the Sun family of web servers for many years now, and ran Netscape Enterprise Server 3.6 for a long time.
Several months ago we upgraded to Sun ONE Web Server 6.0 and then 6.1. We have not had any issues until the past few weeks.
Specifically, the web server appears to 'go to sleep' or 'hang' for many seconds - sometimes up to 45 seconds - before processing any requests.
The server will accept the connection immediately but will not return a page. If left alone, the problem will go away, only to return again. A stop and start will also cure the problem.
Some background: 6 web servers run on this same server (Sun E250 2x400 MHz, 1280 MB RAM) - these servers are all relatively lightly loaded. Copper gigabit connection for network.
Primary data is static, with very few cgi-bin scripts and no applets or server-side Java.
All 6 servers have DNS lookups enabled with caching. The server also has a local DNS caching server running (BIND 9) which is used to help performance.
One of the 'public' web servers (external people can access it) is the one showing these performance issues. I've enabled statistics, and it seems during these 'sleepy' periods I see the following in /.perf (which it finally returns): (I am fetching /.perf every minute and timing how long it takes to fetch it, then saving it in a separate file):
webservd pid: 9507
Sun ONE Web Server 6.1 B08/22/2003 12:37 (SunOS DOMESTIC)
Server started Thu Mar 11 00:31:37 2004
Process 9507 started Thu Mar 11 00:31:37 2004
ConnectionQueue:
Current/Peak/Limit Queue Length 98/98/4096
Total Connections Queued 17873
Average Queueing Delay 0.11 milliseconds
ListenSocket group1:
Address http://146.137.96.68:80
Acceptor Threads 1
Default Virtual Server https-www.anl.gov
KeepAliveInfo:
KeepAliveCount 0/256
KeepAliveHits 1414
KeepAliveFlushes 0
KeepAliveRefusals 0
KeepAliveTimeouts 709
KeepAliveTimeout 30 seconds
SessionCreationInfo:
Active Sessions 105
Total Sessions Created 158/256
CacheInfo:
enabled yes
CacheEntries 1024/1024
Hit Ratio 58558/76530 ( 76.52%)
Maximum Age 30
Native pools:
NativePool:
Idle/Peak/Limit 1/1/128
Work Queue Length/Peak/Limit 0/0/0
DNSCacheInfo:
enabled yes
CacheEntries 406/2048
HitRatio 16547/18476 ( 89.56%)
Async DNS disabled
Performance Counters:
Average Total Percent
Total number of requests: 16961
Request processing time: 0.5940 10074.6680
default-bucket (Default bucket)
Number of Requests: 16961 (100.00%)
Number of Invocations: 268684 (100.00%)
Latency: 0.0013 21.2806 ( 0.21%)
Function Processing Time: 0.5927 10053.3877 ( 99.79%)
Total Response Time: 0.5940 10074.6680 (100.00%)
Sessions:
Process Status Function
9507 response flex-log
response flex-log
response shtml_send
response shtml_send
response flex-log
response flex-log
response flex-log
response shtml_send
response flex-log
response flex-log
response flex-log
response shtml_send
response flex-log
response flex-log
response shtml_send
response shtml_send
response shtml_send
response flex-log
response flex-log
response flex-log
response shtml_send
response flex-log
response flex-log
response flex-log
response shtml_send
response shtml_send
response flex-log
response flex-log
response flex-log
response flex-log
response flex-log
response send-file
response shtml_send
response flex-log
response flex-log
response flex-log
response flex-log
response shtml_send
response shtml_send
response flex-log
response flex-log
response shtml_send
response shtml_send
response flex-log
response flex-log
response flex-log
response shtml_send
response flex-log
response shtml_send
response shtml_send
response flex-log
response shtml_send
response flex-log
response shtml_send
response shtml_send
response flex-log
response shtml_send
response flex-log
response flex-log
response shtml_send
response flex-log
response send-cgi
response send-cgi
response shtml_send
response flex-log
response flex-log
response shtml_send
response shtml_send
response shtml_send
response shtml_send
response shtml_send
response shtml-hacktype
response flex-log
response send-cgi
response send-cgi
response send-file
response send-cgi
response flex-log
response shtml_send
response shtml_send
response shtml_send
response flex-log
response shtml_send
response send-file
response flex-log
response send-cgi
response shtml_send
response flex-log
response shtml_send
response send-cgi
response shtml_send
response shtml_send
response flex-log
response flex-log
response send-cgi
response shtml_send
response send-cgi
response flex-log
response shtml_send
response send-file
response send-cgi
response shtml_send
response shtml_send
response flex-log
response service-dump
Why do I have all of these processes queued on the server?
Is DNS causing this? I know Sun ONE 6.x does NOT have asynchronous DNS implemented (although it is an option, it has no effect). Did Netscape Enterprise Server 3.6 has ASync DNS implemented?
We would like to avoid turning off DNS resolution for a number of reasons. However, what really bothers us is that this web server's performance suddenly became a problem while the other 5 servers see FANTASTIC performance and never go to sleep (although some of them are NOT accessible from the general Internet).
Has anyone else seen this?
As a side note, all of these web servers are using a NSAPI plugin that I wrote years ago. It's purpose is access control and automatic forwarding to different pages. It also uses DNS hostnames, but thinking it might be a problem with this web server, I've disabled DNS on the plug-in. It has not helped. Again, this plug-in has worked great for years and is quite straightforward and simple.
Something tells me there is more going on here - thoughts or ideas?
We're getting immensely frustrated here.
In desperation we've made some magnus.conf changes but to no real effect (partially listed below):
DNS on
RqThrottle 256
StackSize 131072
CGIWaitPid on
AsyncDNS off
KeepAliveThreads 2
MaxKeepAliveConnections 256
UseNativePoll 1
RcvBufSize 8192
# default=100
KeepAliveQueryMeanTime 25
# default=100
KeepAliveQueryMaxSleepTime 25
# CGI
MinCgiStubs 10
MaxCgiStubs 50
CGIStubIdleTimeout 45
CGIExpirationTimeout 90
Thanks for any pointers,
--DaveNote that at the moment it seems to be responding normally, but we still have a lot of threads hanging around - very strange...
9507 response flex-log
response flex-log
response flex-log
response flex-log
response flex-log
response shtml_send
response flex-log
response flex-log
response shtml_send
response flex-log
response flex-log
response flex-log
processing flex-log
response shtml_send
response flex-log
response shtml_send
response shtml_send
response shtml_send
response flex-log
response flex-log
response flex-log
response flex-log
response flex-log
response shtml_send
response flex-log
response shtml_send
response flex-log
response shtml_send
response flex-log
response shtml_send
response flex-log
response send-file
response shtml_send
response flex-log
response shtml_send
response send-file
response service-dump
response shtml_send
response shtml_send
response shtml_send
response flex-log
response send-file
response flex-log
response flex-log
response shtml_send
response shtml_send
response flex-log
response flex-log
response shtml_send
response shtml_send
response shtml_send
response flex-log
response shtml_send
response shtml_send
response shtml_send
response shtml_send
response flex-log
response flex-log
response shtml_send
response shtml_send
response shtml_send
response send-file
response flex-log
response flex-log
response flex-log
response flex-log
response flex-log
response flex-log
response flex-log
response shtml_send
response flex-log
response shtml_send
response flex-log
response flex-log
response flex-log
response flex-log
response flex-log
response flex-log
response shtml_send
response flex-log
response shtml_send
response flex-log
response flex-log
response flex-log
response flex-log
response flex-log
response shtml_send
response flex-log
response shtml_send
response shtml_send
response shtml_send
response flex-log
response flex-log
response shtml_send
response flex-log
response flex-log
response flex-log -
Report performance Issue in BI Answers
Hi All,
We have a performance issues with reports. Report is running more than 10 mins. we took query from the session log and ran it in database, at that time it took not more than 2 mins. We have verified proper indexes on the where clause columns.
Could any once suggest to improve the performance in BI answers?
Thanks in advance,I hope you dont have many case statements and complex calculations that you do in the Answers.
Next thing you need to monitor is how many rows of data that you are trying to retrieve from the query. If the volume is huge then it takes time to do the formatting on the Answers as you are going to dump huge volumes of data. Database(like teradata) returns initially like 1-2000 records if you hit show all records then even db is gonna fair amount of time if you are dumping many records
hope it helps
thanks
Prash -
Interested by performance issue ? Read this ! If you can explain, you're a master Jedi !
This is the question we will try to answer...
What si the bottle neck (hardware) of Adobe Premiere Pro CS6
I used PPBM5 as a benchmark testing template.
All the data and log as been collected using performance counter
First of all, describe my computer...
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 8 Pro 64-bit
CPU
Intel Xeon E5 2687W @ 3.10GHz
Sandy Bridge-EP/EX 32nm Technology
RAM
Corsair Dominator Platinum 64.0 GB DDR3
Motherboard
EVGA Corporation Classified SR-X
Graphics
PNY Nvidia Quadro 6000
EVGA Nvidia GTX 680 // Yes, I created bench stats for both card
Hard Drives
16.0GB Romex RAMDISK (RAID)
556GB LSI MegaRAID 9260-8i SATA3 6GB/s 5 disks with Fastpath Chip Installed (RAID 0)
I have other RAID installed, but not relevant for the present post...
PSU
Cosair 1000 Watts
After many days of tests, I wanna share my results with community and comment them.
CPU Introduction
I tested my cpu and pushed it at maximum speed to understand where is the limit, can I reach this limit and I've logged precisely all result in graph (See pictures 1).
Intro : I tested my E5-XEON 2687W (8 Cores Hyperthread - 16 threads) to know if programs can use the maximum of it. I used Prime 95 to get the result. // I know this seem to be ordinary, but you will understand soon...
The result : Yes, I can get 100% of my CPU with 1 program using 20 threads in parallel. The CPU gives everything it can !
Comment : I put 3 IO (cpu, disk, ram) on the graph of my computer during the test...
(picture 1)
Disk Introduction
I tested my disk and pushed it at maximum speed to understand where is the limit and I've logged precisely all result in graph (See pictures 2).
Intro : I tested my RAID 0 556GB (LSI MegaRAID 9260-8i SATA3 6GB/s 5 disks with Fastpath Chip Installed) to know if I can reach the maximum % disk usage (0% idle Time)
The result : As you can see in picture 2, yes, I can get the max of my drive at ~ 1.2 Gb/sec read/write steady !
Comment : I put 3 IO (cpu, disk, ram) on the graph of my computer during the test to see the impact of transfering many Go of data during ~10 sec...
(picture 2)
Now, I know my limits ! It's time to enter deeper in the subject !
PPBM5 (H.264) Result
I rendered the sequence (H.264) using Adobe Media Encoder.
The result :
My CPU is not used at 100%, the turn around 50%
My Disk is totally idle !
All the process usage are idle except process of (Adobe Media Encoder)
The transfert rate seem to be a wave (up and down). Probably caused by (Encrypt time.... write.... Encrypt time.... write...) // It's ok, ~5Mb/sec during transfert rate !
CPU Power management give 100% of clock to CPU during the encoding process (it's ok, the clock is stable during process).
RAM, more than enough ! 39 Go RAM free after the test ! // Excellent
~65 thread opened by Adobe Media Encoder (Good, thread is the sign that program try to using many cores !)
GPU Load on card seem to be a wave also ! (up and down) ~40% usage of GPU during the process of encoding.
GPU Ram get 1.2Go of RAM (But with GTX 680, no problem and Quadro 6000 with 6 GB RAM, no problem !)
Comment/Question : CPU is free (50%), disks are free (99%), GPU is free (60%), RAM is free (62%), my computer is not pushed at limit during the encoding process. Why ???? Is there some time delay in the encoding process ?
Other : Quadro 6000 & GTX 680 gives the same result !
(picture 3)
PPBM5 (Disk Test) Result (RAID LSI)
I rendered the sequence (Disk Test) using Adobe Media Encoder on my RAID 0 LSI disk.
The result :
My CPU is not used at 100%
My Disk wave and wave again, but far far from the limit !
All the process usage are idle except process of (Adobe Media Encoder)
The transfert rate wave and wave again (up and down). Probably caused by (Buffering time.... write.... Buffering time.... write...) // It's ok, ~375Mb/sec peak during transfert rate ! Easy !
CPU Power management give 100% of clock to CPU during the encoding process (it's ok, the clock is stable during process).
RAM, more than enough ! 40.5 Go RAM free after the test ! // Excellent
~48 thread opened by Adobe Media Encoder (Good, thread is the sign that program try to using many cores !)
GPU Load on card = 0 (This kind of encoding is GPU irrelevant)
GPU Ram get 400Mb of RAM (No usage for encoding)
Comment/Question : CPU is free (65%), disks are free (60%), GPU is free (100%), RAM is free (63%), my computer is not pushed at limit during the encoding process. Why ???? Is there some time delay in the encoding process ?
(picture 4)
PPBM5 (Disk Test) Result (Direct in RAMDrive)
I rendered the same sequence (Disk Test) using Adobe Media Encoder directly in my RamDrive
Comment/Question : Look at the transfert rate under (picture 5). It's exactly the same speed than with my RAID 0 LSI controller. Impossible ! Look in the same picture the transfert rate I can reach with the ramdrive (> 3.0 Gb/sec steady) and I don't go under 30% of disk usage. CPU is idle (70%), Disk is idle (100%), GPU is idle (100%) and RAM is free (63%). // This kind of results let me REALLY confused. It's smell bug and big problem with hardware and IO usage in CS6 !
(picture 5)
PPBM5 (MPEG-DVD) Result
I rendered the sequence (MPEG-DVD) using Adobe Media Encoder.
The result :
My CPU is not used at 100%
My Disk is totally idle !
All the process usage are idle except process of (Adobe Media Encoder)
The transfert rate wave and wave again (up and down). Probably caused by (Encoding time.... write.... Encoding time.... write...) // It's ok, ~2Mb/sec during transfert rate ! Real Joke !
CPU Power management give 100% of clock to CPU during the encoding process (it's ok, the clock is stable during process).
RAM, more than enough ! 40 Go RAM free after the test ! // Excellent
~80 thread opened by Adobe Media Encoder (Lot of thread, but it's ok in multi-thread apps!)
GPU Load on card = 100 (This use the maximum of my GPU)
GPU Ram get 1Gb of RAM
Comment/Question : CPU is free (70%), disks are free (98%), GPU is loaded (MAX), RAM is free (63%), my computer is pushed at limit during the encoding process for GPU only. Now, for this kind of encoding, the speed limit is affected by the slower IO (Video Card GPU)
Other : Quadro 6000 is slower than GTX 680 for this kind of encoding (~20 s slower than GTX).
(picture 6)
Encoding single clip FULL HD AVCHD to H.264 Result (Premiere Pro CS6)
You can look the result in the picture.
Comment/Question : CPU is free (55%), disks are free (99%), GPU is free (90%), RAM is free (65%), my computer is not pushed at limit during the encoding process. Why ???? Adobe Premiere seem to have some bug with thread management. My hardware is idle ! I understand AVCHD can be very difficult to decode, but where is the waste ? My computer want, but the software not !
(picture 7)
Render composition using 3D Raytracer in After Effects CS6
You can look the result in the picture.
Comment : GPU seems to be the bottle neck when using After Effects. CPU is free (99%), Disks are free (98%), Memory is free (60%) and it depend of the setting and type of project.
Other : Quadro 6000 & GTX 680 gives the same result in time for rendering the composition.
(picture 8)
Conclusion
There is nothing you can do (I thing) with CS6 to get better performance actually. GTX 680 is the best (Consumer grade card) and the Quadro 6000 is the best (Profressional card). Both of card give really similar result (I will probably return my GTX 680 since I not really get any better performance). I not used Tesla card with my Quadro, but actually, both, Premiere Pro & After Effects doesn't use multi GPU. I tried to used both card together (GTX & Quadro), but After Effects gives priority to the slower card (In this case, the GTX 680)
Premiere Pro, I'm speechless ! Premiere Pro is not able to get max performance of my computer. Not just 10% or 20%, but average 60%. I'm a programmor, multi-threadling apps are difficult to manage and I can understand Adobe's programmor. But actually, if anybody have comment about this post, tricks or any kind of solution, you can comment this post. It's seem to be a bug...
Thank you.Patrick,
I can't explain everything, but let me give you some background as I understand it.
The first issue is that CS6 has a far less efficient internal buffering or caching system than CS5/5.5. That is why the MPEG encoding in CS6 is roughly 2-3 times slower than the same test with CS5. There is some 'under-the-hood' processing going on that causes this significant performance loss.
The second issue is that AME does not handle regular memory and inter-process memory very well. I have described this here: Latest News
As to your test results, there are some other noteworthy things to mention. 3D Ray tracing in AE is not very good in using all CUDA cores. In fact it is lousy, it only uses very few cores and the threading is pretty bad and does not use the video card's capabilities effectively. Whether that is a driver issue with nVidia or an Adobe issue, I don't know, but whichever way you turn it, the end result is disappointing.
The overhead AME carries in our tests is something we are looking into and the next test will only use direct export and no longer the AME queue, to avoid some of the problems you saw. That entails other problems for us, since we lose the capability to check encoding logs, but a solution is in the works.
You see very low GPU usage during the H.264 test, since there are only very few accelerated parts in the timeline, in contrast to the MPEG2-DVD test, where there is rescaling going on and that is CUDA accelerated. The disk I/O test suffers from the problems mentioned above and is the reason that my own Disk I/O results are only 33 seconds with the current test, but when I extend the duration of that timeline to 3 hours, the direct export method gives me 22 seconds, although the amount of data to be written, 37,092 MB has increased threefold. An effective write speed of 1,686 MB/s.
There are a number of performance issues with CS6 that Adobe is aware of, but whether they can be solved and in what time, I haven't the faintest idea.
Just my $ 0.02 -
RE: Case 59063: performance issues w/ C TLIB and Forte3M
Hi James,
Could you give me a call, I am at my desk.
I had meetings all day and couldn't respond to your calls earlier.
-----Original Message-----
From: James Min [mailto:jminbrio.forte.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 30, 2000 2:50 PM
To: Sharma, Sandeep; Pyatetskiy, Alexander
Cc: sophiaforte.com; kenlforte.com; Tenerelli, Mike
Subject: Re: Case 59063: performance issues w/ C TLIB and Forte 3M
Hello,
I just want to reiterate that we are very committed to working on
this issue, and that our goal is to find out the root of the problem. But
first I'd like to narrow down the avenues by process of elimination.
Open Cursor is something that is commonly used in today's RDBMS. I
know that you must test your query in ISQL using some kind of execute
immediate, but Sybase should be able to handle an open cursor. I was
wondering if your Sybase expert commented on the fact that the server is
not responding to commonly used command like 'open cursor'. According to
our developer, we are merely following the API from Sybase, and open cursor
is not something that particularly slows down a query for several minutes
(except maybe the very first time). The logs show that Forte is waiting for
a status from the DB server. Actually, using prepared statements and open
cursor ends up being more efficient in the long run.
Some questions:
1) Have you tried to do a prepared statement with open cursor in your ISQL
session? If so, did it have the same slowness?
2) How big is the table you are querying? How many rows are there? How many
are returned?
3) When there is a hang in Forte, is there disk-spinning or CPU usage in
the database server side? On the Forte side? Absolutely no activity at all?
We actually have a Sybase set-up here, and if you wish, we could test out
your database and Forte PEX here. Since your queries seems to be running
off of only one table, this might be the best option, as we could look at
everything here, in house. To do this:
a) BCP out the data into a flat file. (character format to make it portable)
b) we need a script to create the table and indexes.
c) the Forte PEX file of the app to test this out.
d) the SQL staement that you issue in ISQL for comparison.
If the situation warrants, we can give a concrete example of
possible errors/bugs to a developer. Dial-in is still an option, but to be
able to look at the TOOL code, database setup, etc. without the limitations
of dial-up may be faster and more efficient. Please let me know if you can
provide this, as well as the answers to the above questions, or if you have
any questions.
Regards,
At 08:05 AM 3/30/00 -0500, Sharma, Sandeep wrote:
James, Ken:
FYI, see attached response from our Sybase expert, Dani Sasmita. She has
already tried what you suggested and results are enclosed.
++
Sandeep
-----Original Message-----
From: SASMITA, DANIAR
Sent: Wednesday, March 29, 2000 6:43 PM
To: Pyatetskiy, Alexander
Cc: Sharma, Sandeep; Tenerelli, Mike
Subject: Re: FW: Case 59063: Select using LIKE has performance
issues
w/ CTLIB and Forte 3M
We did that trick already.
When it is hanging, I can see what is doing.
It is doing OPEN CURSOR. But not clear the exact statement of the cursor
it is trying to open.
When we run the query directly to Sybase, not using Forte, it is clearly
not opening any cursor.
And running it directly to Sybase many times, the response is always
consistently fast.
It is just when the query runs from Forte to Sybase, it opens a cursor.
But again, in the Forte code, Alex is not using any cursor.
In trying to capture the query,we even tried to audit any statementcoming
to Sybase. Same thing, just open cursor. No cursor declaration anywhere.==============================================
James Min
Technical Support Engineer - Forte Tools
Sun Microsystems, Inc.
1800 Harrison St., 17th Fl.
Oakland, CA 94612
james.minsun.com
510.869.2056
==============================================
Support Hotline: 510-451-5400
CUSTOMERS open a NEW CASE with Technical Support:
http://www.forte.com/support/case_entry.html
CUSTOMERS view your cases and enter follow-up transactions:
http://www.forte.com/support/view_calls.htmlEarthlink wrote:
Contrary to my understanding, the <font face="courier">with_pipeline</font> procedure runs 6 time slower than the legacy <font face="courier">no_pipeline</font> procedure. Am I missing something? Well, we're missing a lot here.
Like:
- a database version
- how did you test
- what data do you have, how is it distributed, indexed
and so on.
If you want to find out what's going on then use a TRACE with wait events.
All nessecary steps are explained in these threads:
HOW TO: Post a SQL statement tuning request - template posting
http://oracle-randolf.blogspot.com/2009/02/basic-sql-statement-performance.html
Another nice one is RUNSTATS:
http://asktom.oracle.com/pls/asktom/ASKTOM.download_file?p_file=6551378329289980701 -
Hello,
I encountered a serious performance bug in Adobe Air iOS application on devices running iOS 8.1 or later. Approximately in 1-2 minutes fps drops to 7 or lower without interacting with the app. This is very noticeable in the app. The app looks like frozen for about 0.5 seconds. The bug doesn't appear on every session.
Devices tested: iPad Mini iOS 8.1.1, iPhone 6 iOS 8.2. iPod Touch 4 iOS 6 is working correctly.
Air SDK versions: 15 and 17 tested.
I can track the bug using Adobe Scout. There is a noticeable spike on frame time 1.16. Framerate drops to 7.0. The App spends much time on function Runtime overhead. Sometimes the top activity is Running AS3 attached to frame or Waiting For Next Frame instead of Runtime overhead.
The bug can be reproduced on an empty application having a one bitmap on stage. Open the app and wait for two minutes and the bug should appear. If not, just close and relaunch the app.
Bugbase link: Bug#3965160 - iOS 8.1+ Performance Issue
Miska SavelaHi
Id already activated Messages and entered the 6 digit code I was presented with into my iPhone. I can receive txt messages from non iOS users on my iMac and can reply to those messages.
I just can't send a new message from scratch to a non iOS user :-s
Thanks
Baz -
Performance issues with LOV bindings in 3-tier BC4J architecture
We are running BC4J and JClient (Jdeveloper 9.0.3.4/9iAS 9.0.2) in a 3-tier architecture, and have problems with the performance.
One of our problems are comboboxes with LOV bindings. The view objects that provides data for the LOV bindings contains simple queries from tables with only 4-10 rows, and there are no view links or entity objects to these views.
To create the LOV binding and to set the model for the combobox takes about 1 second for each combobox.
We have tried most of tips in http://otn.oracle.com/products/jdev/tips/muench/jclientperf/index.html, but they do not seem to help on our problem.
The performance is OK (if not great) when the same code is running as 2-tier.
Does anyone have any good suggestions?I can recommend that you look at the following two bugs in Metalink: Bug 2640945 and Bug 3621502
They are related to the disabling of the TCP socket-level acknowledgement which slows down remote communications for EJB components using ORMI (the protocol used by Oracle OC4J) to communicate between remote EJB client and server.
A BC4J Application Module deployed as an EJB suffers this same network latency penalty due to the TCP acknowledgement.
A customer sent me information (that you'll see there as a part of Bug# 3621502) like this on a related issue:
We found our application runs very slow in 3-Tier mode (JClient, BC4J deployed
as EJB Session Bean on 9iAS server 9.0.2 enterprise edition). We spent a lot
of time to tune up our codes but that helped very little. Eventually, we found
the problem seemed to happen on TCP level. There is a 200ms delay in TCP
level. After we read some documents about Nagle Algorithm, we disabled a
registry key (TcpDelAckTicks) in windows2000 on both client and server. This
makes our program a lot faster.
Anyway, we think we should provide our clients a better solution other than
changing windows registry for them, for example, there may be a way to disable
that Nagle's algorithm through java.net.Socket.setTcpNoDelay(true), in BC4J,
or anywhere in our codes. We have not figured out yet.
Bug 2640945 was fixed in Oracle Application Server 10g (v9.0.4) and it now disables this TCP Acknowledgement on the server side in that release. In the BugDB, I see backport patches available for earlier 9.0.3 and 9.0.2 releases of IAS as well.
Bug 3621502 is requesting that that same disabling also be performed on the client side by the ORMI code. I have received a test patch from development to try out, but haven't had the chance yet.
The customer's workaround in the interim was to disable this TCP Acknowledgement at the OS level by modifying a Windows registry setting as noted above.
See Also http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?kbid=328890
"New registry entry for controlling the TCP Acknowledgment (ACK) behavior in Windows XP and in Windows Server 2003" which documents that the registry entry to change disable this acknowledgement has a different name in Windows XP and Windows 2003.
Hope this info helps. It would be useful to hear back from you on whether this helps your performance issue. -
MacBook Pro performance issues w/2nd monitor and FCP7
I have this MacBook Pro bought brand-new in January 2010:
Model Name: MacBook Pro
Model Identifier: MacBookPro5,2
Processor Name: Intel Core 2 Duo
Processor Speed: 3.06 GHz
Number Of Processors: 1
Total Number Of Cores: 2
L2 Cache: 6 MB
Memory: 8 GB
Bus Speed: 1.07 GHz
and until today had never attached a second monitor to it. Today I hooked up my Samsung 24" to do some dual screen editing in Final Cut 7.0.3. I was unable to play back my video at full speed in the second monitor, and after a few seconds of skippy playback I'd get that error message about unable to play back video at full speed and to check my RT settings. I was using a Mini DisplayPort to DVI adapter. My computer has no issues playing the video in the laptop's monitor at any resolution and any quality settings (I've never changed the RT settings or anything else in the menu ever but I tried every combination this time). I then tried using my TV as a 2nd monitor with an HDMI adapter. Same performance issues. I then tried my friend's newer 13" MBP 8,1 and it performed flawlessly with the same project & footage. I feel like my $3,000 computer should outperform a $1,200 one even if mine is a year and a half older. Any advice?
ChrisWow, you posted this perfectly to coincide with an identical problem, albeit using Logic Pro 9.1.5 rather than FCP.
Last week, I purchased a 23" external monitor to use alongside my "flagship" 2011 15" hi-res, 2.3 i7 Macbook Pro with 8Gb of RAM.
It is connected via a mini-DVI to D-sub analog (not that that should matter?) and all appeared fine.
The first issue I had was with my MBP's fan now running CONSTANTLY, when I have the second monitor attached. Even when the machine is completely idle.
When using the machine to record audio, this is a fairly hefty problem and not something I had anticipated - indeed why would I anticipate such a thing?
What is far, far worse though is that over the last few days I have had repeated problems with performance drop-outs and errors in Logic and I have trying to fathom out why. Realising that the only major system change made, was the above monitor connection, I ran some tests.
I restarted my MBP, no other apps were running and with my new 23" monitor attached acting as main display with MBP built in display on as secondary
I loaded up a fairly demanding Logic project which was hitting 40% to 60% CPU usage when using the built in MBP display last week
I ran activity monitor and had CPU usage history open
The above project now repeatedly overloads and playback halts in a given 8 bar section - with CPU at 80% most of the time
I disconnected the external display, no shut down, I just let the machine switch to the built in 15".
Started the same project, the same 8 bar section and hey presto - CPU usage back down to 40% to 60%
The above was reflected in the CPU usage history with the graph showing CPU use down by about a half, when running this Logic project WITHOUT the external display.
There is a very useful benchmark Logic project that has been used as a test by many users to gauge Logic performance on given Apple hardware.
The project has about 100 tracks pre-configured with CPU intensive plugins, designed to tax the CPU.
The idea is that you load up the project with tracks muted, press play and then unmute the tracks steadily until Logic us unable to play contiunously because of a system performance error.
On my MBP, with the external monitor NOT attached, I can play back around 50 of the audio tracks in this benchmark project.
With the monitor attached, I can get about 22 tracks playing.... which is actually a far worse a performance drop (-50% I think!?) than with the first example!
I did also try with just the external monitor attached and not the MBP display and performance was about 10% better than with dual monitors - so still extremely poor, to say the least.
This machine is the flagship MBP and has a dedicated AMD Radeon HD6750 GPU which should take care of most if not ALL graphics processing - I mean it's capable of running some pretty demanding games!
Putting aside the issue of constant fan noise, there is no reason AT ALL, why using an external monitor should tax the i7 CPU this way - it's not as though Logic is graphically demanding... far from it.
I am on 10.6.8, Logic 9.1.5, all apps up to date via "Software Update".
I will of course, be contacting Apple... -
Performance issue in DB need help with analysing this ADDM report
Hi,
My environment:
Os: RHEL5U3 / 11.1.0.7 64 bit / R12.1.1 64 bit
Issue:
Few days are am facing serious of performance problem in our Production instance. Normally the issue will occur 5 to 10 minutes occasionally per day. At the time of issue we not able to access the EBS application its taking time to load. But backend all the oracle, listener and apps services are up and running. No locks at table and session level. Cpu and memory usage is normal.
We have monitored using "Enterprise Manager" for this issue and we found the wait session present more in Active session tab. At this time EBS application is not able access its loading too time. After some time the in Active session tab the wait session came normal and when we try to access the EBS application its working fine.
We try to find the cause of the issue by running addm report. But am not able to understand what its says. Kindly suggests me
ADDM Report for Task 'TASK_42656'
Analysis Period
AWR snapshot range from 14754 to 14755.
Time period starts at 17-APR-12 11.00.22 AM
Time period ends at 17-APR-12 12.00.33 PM
Analysis Target
Database 'PRD' with DB ID 1789440879.
Database version 11.1.0.7.0.
ADDM performed an analysis of instance PRD, numbered 1 and hosted at
advgrpdb.advgroup.ae.
Activity During the Analysis Period
Total database time was 18674 seconds.
The average number of active sessions was 5.17.
Summary of Findings
Description Active Sessions Recommendations
Percent of Activity
1 Top SQL by DB Time 3.43 | 66.33 5
2 Buffer Busy 2.52 | 48.81 5
3 Buffer Busy 1.39 | 26.81 2
4 Log File Switches .91 | 17.56 1
5 Buffer Busy .56 | 10.87 2
6 Undersized SGA .38 | 7.37 1
7 Commits and Rollbacks .28 | 5.42 1
8 Undo I/O .18 | 3.53 0
9 CPU Usage .13 | 2.57 1
10 Top SQL By I/O .11 | 2.21 1
Findings and Recommendations
Finding 1: Top SQL by DB Time
Impact is 3.43 active sessions, 66.33% of total activity.
SQL statements consuming significant database time were found.
Recommendation 1: SQL Tuning
Estimated benefit is 1.59 active sessions, 30.8% of total activity.
Action
Investigate the SQL statement with SQL_ID "a49xsqhv0h31b" for possible
performance improvements.
Related Object
SQL statement with SQL_ID a49xsqhv0h31b.
SELECT R.Conc_Login_Id, R.Request_Id, R.Phase_Code, R.Status_Code,
P.Application_ID, P.Concurrent_Program_ID, P.Concurrent_Program_Name,
R.Enable_Trace, R.Restart, DECODE(R.Increment_Dates, 'Y', 'Y', 'N'),
R.NLS_Compliant, R.OUTPUT_FILE_TYPE, E.Executable_Name,
E.Execution_File_Name, A2.Basepath, DECODE(R.Stale, 'Y', 'C',
P.Execution_Method_Code), P.Print_Flag, P.Execution_Options,
DECODE(P.Srs_Flag, 'Y', 'Y', 'Q', 'Y', 'N'), P.Argument_Method_Code,
R.Print_Style, R.Argument_Input_Method_Code, R.Queue_Method_Code,
R.Responsibility_ID, R.Responsibility_Application_ID, R.Requested_By,
R.Number_Of_Copies, R.Save_Output_Flag, R.Printer, R.Print_Group,
R.Priority, U.User_Name, O.Oracle_Username,
O.Encrypted_Oracle_Password, R.Cd_Id, A.Basepath,
A.Application_Short_Name, TO_CHAR(R.Requested_Start_Date,'YYYY/MM/DD
HH24:MI:SS'), R.Nls_Language, R.Nls_Territory,
R.Nls_Numeric_Characters, DECODE(R.Parent_Request_ID, NULL, 0,
R.Parent_Request_ID), R.Priority_Request_ID, R.Single_Thread_Flag,
R.Has_Sub_Request, R.Is_Sub_Request, R.Req_Information,
R.Description, R.Resubmit_Time, TO_CHAR(R.Resubmit_Interval),
R.Resubmit_Interval_Type_Code, R.Resubmit_Interval_Unit_Code,
TO_CHAR(R.Resubmit_End_Date,'YYYY/MM/DD HH24:MI:SS'),
Decode(E.Execution_File_Name, NULL, 'N', Decode(E.Subroutine_Name,
NULL, Decode(E.Execution_Method_Code, 'I', 'Y', 'J', 'Y', 'N'),
'Y')), R.Argument1, R.Argument2, R.Argument3, R.Argument4,
R.Argument5, R.Argument6, R.Argument7, R.Argument8, R.Argument9,
R.Argument10, R.Argument11, R.Argument12, R.Argument13, R.Argument14,
R.Argument15, R.Argument16, R.Argument17, R.Argument18, R.Argument19,
R.Argument20, R.Argument21, R.Argument22, R.Argument23, R.Argument24,
R.Argument25, X.Argument26, X.Argument27, X.Argument28, X.Argument29,
X.Argument30, X.Argument31, X.Argument32, X.Argument33, X.Argument34,
X.Argument35, X.Argument36, X.Argument37, X.Argument38, X.Argument39,
X.Argument40, X.Argument41, X.Argument42, X.Argument43, X.Argument44,
X.Argument45, X.Argument46, X.Argument47, X.Argument48, X.Argument49,
X.Argument50, X.Argument51, X.Argument52, X.Argument53, X.Argument54,
X.Argument55, X.Argument56, X.Argument57, X.Argument58, X.Argument59,
X.Argument60, X.Argument61, X.Argument62, X.Argument63, X.Argument64,
X.Argument65, X.Argument66, X.Argument67, X.Argument68, X.Argument69,
X.Argument70, X.Argument71, X.Argument72, X.Argument73, X.Argument74,
X.Argument75, X.Argument76, X.Argument77, X.Argument78, X.Argument79,
X.Argument80, X.Argument81, X.Argument82, X.Argument83, X.Argument84,
X.Argument85, X.Argument86, X.Argument87, X.Argument88, X.Argument89,
X.Argument90, X.Argument91, X.Argument92, X.Argument93, X.Argument94,
X.Argument95, X.Argument96, X.Argument97, X.Argument98, X.Argument99,
X.Argument100, R.number_of_arguments, C.CD_Name,
NVL(R.Security_Group_ID, 0), NVL(R.org_id, 0) FROM
fnd_concurrent_requests R, fnd_concurrent_programs P, fnd_application
A, fnd_user U, fnd_oracle_userid O, fnd_conflicts_domain C,
fnd_concurrent_queues Q, fnd_application A2, fnd_executables E,
fnd_conc_request_arguments X WHERE R.Status_code = 'I' And
((R.OPS_INSTANCE is null) or (R.OPS_INSTANCE = -1) or
(R.OPS_INSTANCE =
decode(:dcp_on,1,FND_CONC_GLOBAL.OPS_INST_NUM,R.OPS_INSTANCE))) And
R.Request_ID = X.Request_ID(+) And R.Program_Application_Id =
P.Application_Id(+) And R.Concurrent_Program_Id =
P.Concurrent_Program_Id(+) And R.Program_Application_Id =
A.Application_Id(+) And P.Executable_Application_Id =
E.Application_Id(+) And P.Executable_Id =
E.Executable_Id(+) And P.Executable_Application_Id =
A2.Application_Id(+) And R.Requested_By = U.User_Id(+) And R.Cd_Id
= C.Cd_Id(+) And R.Oracle_Id = O.Oracle_Id(+) And Q.Application_Id =
:q_applid And Q.Concurrent_Queue_Id = :queue_id And (P.Enabled_Flag
is NULL OR P.Enabled_Flag = 'Y') And R.Hold_Flag = 'N' And
R.Requested_Start_Date <= Sysdate And ( R.Enforce_Seriality_Flag =
'N' OR ( C.RunAlone_Flag = P.Run_Alone_Flag And (P.Run_Alone_Flag =
'N' OR Not Exists (Select Null From Fnd_Concurrent_Requests Sr
Where Sr.Status_Code In ('R', 'T') And Sr.Enforce_Seriality_Flag =
'Y' And Sr.CD_id = C.CD_Id)))) And Q.Running_Processes <=
Q.Max_Processes And R.Rowid = :reqname And
((P.Execution_Method_Code != 'S' OR
(R.PROGRAM_APPLICATION_ID,R.CONCURRENT_PROGRAM_ID) IN
((0,98),(0,100),(0,31721),(0,31722),(0,31757))) AND
((R.PROGRAM_APPLICATION_ID,R.CONCURRENT_PROGRAM_ID) NOT IN
((510,40112),(510,40113),(510,41497),(510,41498),(530,41859),(530,418
60),(535,41492),(535,41493),(535,41494)))) FOR UPDATE OF
R.status_code NoWait
Rationale
SQL statement with SQL_ID "a49xsqhv0h31b" was executed 4686 times and
had an average elapsed time of 1.2 seconds.
Rationale
Waiting for event "buffer busy waits" in wait class "Concurrency"
accounted for 85% of the database time spent in processing the SQL
statement with SQL_ID "a49xsqhv0h31b".
Rationale
Waiting for event "log file switch (checkpoint incomplete)" in wait
class "Configuration" accounted for 9% of the database time spent in
processing the SQL statement with SQL_ID "a49xsqhv0h31b".
Recommendation 3: SQL Tuning
Estimated benefit is .56 active sessions, 10.91% of total activity.
Action
Investigate the SQL statement with SQL_ID "5d7957yktf3nn" for possible
performance improvements.
Related Object
SQL statement with SQL_ID 5d7957yktf3nn.
UPDATE ICX_SESSIONS SET TIME_OUT = :B2 WHERE SESSION_ID = :B1
Rationale
SQL statement with SQL_ID "5d7957yktf3nn" was executed 266 times and had
an average elapsed time of 7.6 seconds.
Rationale
Waiting for event "buffer busy waits" in wait class "Concurrency"
accounted for 86% of the database time spent in processing the SQL
statement with SQL_ID "5d7957yktf3nn".
Rationale
Waiting for event "log file switch (checkpoint incomplete)" in wait
class "Configuration" accounted for 7% of the database time spent in
processing the SQL statement with SQL_ID "5d7957yktf3nn".
Finding 2: Buffer Busy
Impact is 2.52 active sessions, 48.81% of total activity.
Read and write contention on database blocks was consuming significant
database time.
Recommendation 1: Application Analysis
Estimated benefit is 1.42 active sessions, 27.44% of total activity.
Action
Trace the cause of object contention due to SELECT statements in the
application using the information provided.
Related Object
Database object with ID 34562.
Rationale
The SELECT statement with SQL_ID "a49xsqhv0h31b" was significantly
affected by "buffer busy" waits.
Related Object
SQL statement with SQL_ID a49xsqhv0h31b.
SELECT R.Conc_Login_Id, R.Request_Id, R.Phase_Code, R.Status_Code,
P.Application_ID, P.Concurrent_Program_ID, P.Concurrent_Program_Name,
R.Enable_Trace, R.Restart, DECODE(R.Increment_Dates, 'Y', 'Y', 'N'),
R.NLS_Compliant, R.OUTPUT_FILE_TYPE, E.Executable_Name,
E.Execution_File_Name, A2.Basepath, DECODE(R.Stale, 'Y', 'C',
P.Execution_Method_Code), P.Print_Flag, P.Execution_Options,
DECODE(P.Srs_Flag, 'Y', 'Y', 'Q', 'Y', 'N'), P.Argument_Method_Code,
R.Print_Style, R.Argument_Input_Method_Code, R.Queue_Method_Code,
R.Responsibility_ID, R.Responsibility_Application_ID, R.Requested_By,
R.Number_Of_Copies, R.Save_Output_Flag, R.Printer, R.Print_Group,
R.Priority, U.User_Name, O.Oracle_Username,
O.Encrypted_Oracle_Password, R.Cd_Id, A.Basepath,
A.Application_Short_Name, TO_CHAR(R.Requested_Start_Date,'YYYY/MM/DD
HH24:MI:SS'), R.Nls_Language, R.Nls_Territory,
R.Nls_Numeric_Characters, DECODE(R.Parent_Request_ID, NULL, 0,
R.Parent_Request_ID), R.Priority_Request_ID, R.Single_Thread_Flag,
R.Has_Sub_Request, R.Is_Sub_Request, R.Req_Information,
R.Description, R.Resubmit_Time, TO_CHAR(R.Resubmit_Interval),
R.Resubmit_Interval_Type_Code, R.Resubmit_Interval_Unit_Code,
TO_CHAR(R.Resubmit_End_Date,'YYYY/MM/DD HH24:MI:SS'),
Decode(E.Execution_File_Name, NULL, 'N', Decode(E.Subroutine_Name,
NULL, Decode(E.Execution_Method_Code, 'I', 'Y', 'J', 'Y', 'N'),
'Y')), R.Argument1, R.Argument2, R.Argument3, R.Argument4,
R.Argument5, R.Argument6, R.Argument7, R.Argument8, R.Argument9,
R.Argument10, R.Argument11, R.Argument12, R.Argument13, R.Argument14,
R.Argument15, R.Argument16, R.Argument17, R.Argument18, R.Argument19,
R.Argument20, R.Argument21, R.Argument22, R.Argument23, R.Argument24,
R.Argument25, X.Argument26, X.Argument27, X.Argument28, X.Argument29,
X.Argument30, X.Argument31, X.Argument32, X.Argument33, X.Argument34,
X.Argument35, X.Argument36, X.Argument37, X.Argument38, X.Argument39,
X.Argument40, X.Argument41, X.Argument42, X.Argument43, X.Argument44,
X.Argument45, X.Argument46, X.Argument47, X.Argument48, X.Argument49,
X.Argument50, X.Argument51, X.Argument52, X.Argument53, X.Argument54,
X.Argument55, X.Argument56, X.Argument57, X.Argument58, X.Argument59,
X.Argument60, X.Argument61, X.Argument62, X.Argument63, X.Argument64,
X.Argument65, X.Argument66, X.Argument67, X.Argument68, X.Argument69,
X.Argument70, X.Argument71, X.Argument72, X.Argument73, X.Argument74,
X.Argument75, X.Argument76, X.Argument77, X.Argument78, X.Argument79,
X.Argument80, X.Argument81, X.Argument82, X.Argument83, X.Argument84,
X.Argument85, X.Argument86, X.Argument87, X.Argument88, X.Argument89,
X.Argument90, X.Argument91, X.Argument92, X.Argument93, X.Argument94,
X.Argument95, X.Argument96, X.Argument97, X.Argument98, X.Argument99,
X.Argument100, R.number_of_arguments, C.CD_Name,
NVL(R.Security_Group_ID, 0), NVL(R.org_id, 0) FROM
fnd_concurrent_requests R, fnd_concurrent_programs P, fnd_application
A, fnd_user U, fnd_oracle_userid O, fnd_conflicts_domain C,
fnd_concurrent_queues Q, fnd_application A2, fnd_executables E,
fnd_conc_request_arguments X WHERE R.Status_code = 'I' And
((R.OPS_INSTANCE is null) or (R.OPS_INSTANCE = -1) or
(R.OPS_INSTANCE =
decode(:dcp_on,1,FND_CONC_GLOBAL.OPS_INST_NUM,R.OPS_INSTANCE))) And
R.Request_ID = X.Request_ID(+) And R.Program_Application_Id =
P.Application_Id(+) And R.Concurrent_Program_Id =
P.Concurrent_Program_Id(+) And R.Program_Application_Id =
A.Application_Id(+) And P.Executable_Application_Id =
E.Application_Id(+) And P.Executable_Id =
E.Executable_Id(+) And P.Executable_Application_Id =
A2.Application_Id(+) And R.Requested_By = U.User_Id(+) And R.Cd_Id
= C.Cd_Id(+) And R.Oracle_Id = O.Oracle_Id(+) And Q.Application_Id =
:q_applid And Q.Concurrent_Queue_Id = :queue_id And (P.Enabled_Flag
is NULL OR P.Enabled_Flag = 'Y') And R.Hold_Flag = 'N' And
R.Requested_Start_Date <= Sysdate And ( R.Enforce_Seriality_Flag =
'N' OR ( C.RunAlone_Flag = P.Run_Alone_Flag And (P.Run_Alone_Flag =
'N' OR Not Exists (Select Null From Fnd_Concurrent_Requests Sr
Where Sr.Status_Code In ('R', 'T') And Sr.Enforce_Seriality_Flag =
'Y' And Sr.CD_id = C.CD_Id)))) And Q.Running_Processes <=
Q.Max_Processes And R.Rowid = :reqname And
((P.Execution_Method_Code != 'S' OR
(R.PROGRAM_APPLICATION_ID,R.CONCURRENT_PROGRAM_ID) IN
((0,98),(0,100),(0,31721),(0,31722),(0,31757))) AND
((R.PROGRAM_APPLICATION_ID,R.CONCURRENT_PROGRAM_ID) NOT IN
((510,40112),(510,40113),(510,41497),(510,41498),(530,41859),(530,418
60),(535,41492),(535,41493),(535,41494)))) FOR UPDATE OF
R.status_code NoWait
UPDATE ICX_SESSIONS SET LAST_CONNECT = SYSDATE WHERE SESSION_ID = :B1
Recommendation 1: Schema Changes
Estimated benefit is .03 active sessions, .62% of total activity.
Action
Consider rebuilding the TABLE "APPLSYS.FND_LOGIN_RESP_FORMS" with object
ID 34651 using a higher value for PCTFREE.
Related Object
Database object with ID 34651.
Rationale
The UPDATE statement with SQL_ID "cqc5crhxxt36t" was significantly
affected by "buffer busy" waits.
Related Object
SQL statement with SQL_ID cqc5crhxxt36t.
UPDATE FND_LOGIN_RESP_FORMS FLRF SET END_TIME = SYSDATE WHERE
FLRF.LOGIN_ID = :B2 AND FLRF.LOGIN_RESP_ID = :B1 AND FLRF.END_TIME IS
NULL AND (FLRF.FORM_ID, FLRF.FORM_APPL_ID) = (SELECT F.FORM_ID,
F.APPLICATION_ID FROM FND_FORM F, FND_APPLICATION A WHERE F.FORM_NAME
= :B4 AND F.APPLICATION_ID = A.APPLICATION_ID AND
A.APPLICATION_SHORT_NAME = :B3 )
Symptoms That Led to the Finding:
Wait class "Concurrency" was consuming significant database time.
Impact is 2.53 active sessions, 48.87% of total activity.
Finding 4: Log File Switches
Impact is .91 active sessions, 17.56% of total activity.
Log file switch operations were consuming significant database time while
waiting for checkpoint completion.
This problem can be caused by use of hot backup mode on tablespaces. DML to
tablespaces in hot backup mode causes generation of additional redo.
Recommendation 1: Database Configuration
Estimated benefit is .91 active sessions, 17.56% of total activity.
Action
Verify whether incremental shipping was used for standby databases.
Symptoms That Led to the Finding:
Wait class "Configuration" was consuming significant database time.
Impact is .91 active sessions, 17.63% of total activity.
Finding 5: Buffer Busy
Impact is .56 active sessions, 10.87% of total activity.
A hot data block with concurrent read and write activity was found. The block
belongs to segment "ICX.ICX_SESSIONS" and is block 243489 in file 36.
Recommendation 1: Application Analysis
Estimated benefit is .56 active sessions, 10.87% of total activity.
Action
Investigate application logic to find the cause of high concurrent read
and write activity to the data present in this block.
Related Object
Database block with object number 37562, file number 36 and block
number 243489.
Rationale
The SQL statement with SQL_ID "5d7957yktf3nn" spent significant time on
"buffer busy" waits for the hot block.
Related Object
SQL statement with SQL_ID 5d7957yktf3nn.
UPDATE ICX_SESSIONS SET TIME_OUT = :B2 WHERE SESSION_ID = :B1
Rationale
The SQL statement with SQL_ID "326up1aym56dd" spent significant time on
"buffer busy" waits for the hot block.
Related Object
SQL statement with SQL_ID 326up1aym56dd.
UPDATE ICX_SESSIONS SET LAST_CONNECT = SYSDATE WHERE SESSION_ID = :B1
Recommendation 2: Schema Changes
Estimated benefit is .56 active sessions, 10.87% of total activity.
Action
Consider rebuilding the TABLE "ICX.ICX_SESSIONS" with object ID 37562
using a higher value for PCTFREE.
Related Object
Database object with ID 37562.
Symptoms That Led to the Finding:
Wait class "Concurrency" was consuming significant database time.
Impact is 2.53 active sessions, 48.87% of total activity.
Finding 6: Undersized SGA
Impact is .38 active sessions, 7.37% of total activity.
The SGA was inadequately sized, causing additional I/O or hard parses.
The value of parameter "sga_target" was "4096 M" during the analysis period.
Recommendation 1: Database Configuration
Estimated benefit is .12 active sessions, 2.33% of total activity.
Action
Increase the size of the SGA by setting the parameter "sga_target" to
4608 M.
Symptoms That Led to the Finding:
Wait class "User I/O" was consuming significant database time.
Impact is .7 active sessions, 13.57% of total activity.
Hard parsing of SQL statements was consuming significant database time.
Impact is .13 active sessions, 2.51% of total activity.
Contention for latches related to the shared pool was consuming
significant database time.
Impact is 0 active sessions, .03% of total activity.
Wait class "Concurrency" was consuming significant database time.
Impact is 2.53 active sessions, 48.87% of total activity.
Finding 7: Commits and Rollbacks
Impact is .28 active sessions, 5.42% of total activity.
Waits on event "log file sync" while performing COMMIT and ROLLBACK operations
were consuming significant database time.
Recommendation 1: Host Configuration
Estimated benefit is .28 active sessions, 5.42% of total activity.
Action
Investigate the possibility of improving the performance of I/O to the
online redo log files.
Rationale
The average size of writes to the online redo log files was 163 K and
the average time per write was 68 milliseconds.
Symptoms That Led to the Finding:
Wait class "Commit" was consuming significant database time.
Impact is .28 active sessions, 5.42% of total activity.
Finding 8: Undo I/O
Impact is .18 active sessions, 3.53% of total activity.
Undo I/O was a significant portion (26%) of the total database I/O.
No recommendations are available.
Symptoms That Led to the Finding:
The throughput of the I/O subsystem was significantly lower than
expected.
Impact is .08 active sessions, 1.46% of total activity.
Wait class "User I/O" was consuming significant database time.
Impact is .7 active sessions, 13.57% of total activity.
Finding 9: CPU Usage
Impact is .13 active sessions, 2.57% of total activity.
Time spent on the CPU by the instance was responsible for a substantial part
of database time.
Recommendation 1: SQL Tuning
Estimated benefit is .13 active sessions, 2.57% of total activity.
Finding 10: Top SQL By I/O
Impact is .11 active sessions, 2.21% of total activity.
Individual SQL statements responsible for significant user I/O wait were
found.
Recommendation 1: SQL Tuning
Estimated benefit is .11 active sessions, 2.22% of total activity.
Action
Run SQL Tuning Advisor on the SQL statement with SQL_ID "b3pnc5yctv2z5".
Related Object
SQL statement with SQL_ID b3pnc5yctv2z5.
INSERT INTO ZX_TRANSACTION_LINES_GT( APPLICATION_ID ,ENTITY_CODE
,EVENT_CLASS_CODE ,TRX_ID ,TRX_LEVEL_TYPE ,TRX_LINE_ID ,LINE_CLASS
,LINE_LEVEL_ACTION ,TRX_LINE_TYPE ,TRX_LINE_DATE
,LINE_AMT_INCLUDES_TAX_FLAG ,LINE_AMT ,TRX_LINE_QUANTITY ,UNIT_PRICE
,PRODUCT_ID ,PRODUCT_ORG_ID ,UOM_CODE ,PRODUCT_CODE ,SHIP_TO_PARTY_ID
,SHIP_FROM_PARTY_ID ,BILL_TO_PARTY_ID ,BILL_FROM_PARTY_ID
,SHIP_FROM_PARTY_SITE_ID ,BILL_FROM_PARTY_SITE_ID
,SHIP_TO_LOCATION_ID ,SHIP_FROM_LOCATION_ID ,BILL_TO_LOCATION_ID
,SHIP_THIRD_PTY_ACCT_ID ,SHIP_THIRD_PTY_ACCT_SITE_ID ,HISTORICAL_FLAG
,TRX_LINE_CURRENCY_CODE ,TRX_LINE_CURRENCY_CONV_DATE
,TRX_LINE_CURRENCY_CONV_RATE ,TRX_LINE_CURRENCY_CONV_TYPE
,TRX_LINE_MAU ,TRX_LINE_PRECISION ,HISTORICAL_TAX_CODE_ID
,TRX_BUSINESS_CATEGORY ,PRODUCT_CATEGORY ,PRODUCT_FISC_CLASSIFICATION
,LINE_INTENDED_USE ,PRODUCT_TYPE ,USER_DEFINED_FISC_CLASS
,ASSESSABLE_VALUE ,INPUT_TAX_CLASSIFICATION_CODE ,ACCOUNT_CCID
,BILL_THIRD_PTY_ACCT_ID ,BILL_THIRD_PTY_ACCT_SITE_ID ,TRX_LINE_NUMBER
,TRX_LINE_DESCRIPTION ,PRODUCT_DESCRIPTION ,USER_UPD_DET_FACTORS_FLAG
,DEFAULTING_ATTRIBUTE1 ) SELECT :B4 ,:B3 ,:B2
,PRL.REQUISITION_HEADER_ID ,:B1 ,PRL.REQUISITION_LINE_ID ,'INVOICE'
,NVL(PRL.TAX_ATTRIBUTE_UPDATE_CODE,'UPDATE') ,'ITEM'
,NVL(PRL.NEED_BY_DATE, SYSDATE) ,'N' ,NVL(PRL.AMOUNT,
PRL.UNIT_PRICE*PRL.QUANTITY) ,PRL.QUANTITY ,PRL.UNIT_PRICE
,PRL.ITEM_ID ,(SELECT FSP.INVENTORY_ORGANIZATION_ID FROM
FINANCIALS_SYSTEM_PARAMS_ALL FSP WHERE FSP.ORG_ID=PRL.ORG_ID)
,(SELECT MUM.UOM_CODE FROM MTL_UNITS_OF_MEASURE MUM WHERE
MUM.UNIT_OF_MEASURE=PRL.UNIT_MEAS_LOOKUP_CODE) ,MSIB.SEGMENT1
,PRL.DESTINATION_ORGANIZATION_ID ,PV.PARTY_ID ,PRH.ORG_ID
,PV.PARTY_ID ,PVS.PARTY_SITE_ID ,PVS.PARTY_SITE_ID
,PRL.DELIVER_TO_LOCATION_ID ,(SELECT HZPS.LOCATION_ID FROM
HZ_PARTY_SITES HZPS WHERE HZPS.PARTY_SITE_ID = PVS.PARTY_SITE_ID)
,(SELECT LOCATION_ID FROM HR_ALL_ORGANIZATION_UNITS WHERE
ORGANIZATION_ID=PRH.ORG_ID) ,PRL.VENDOR_ID ,PRL.VENDOR_SITE_ID ,NULL
,NVL(PRL.CURRENCY_CODE, :B9 ) ,NVL2(PRL.CURRENCY_CODE, PRL.RATE_DATE,
SYSDATE) ,NVL2(PRL.CURRENCY_CODE, PRL.RATE, :B8 )
,NVL2(PRL.CURRENCY_CODE, PRL.RATE_TYPE, :B7 )
,FC.MINIMUM_ACCOUNTABLE_UNIT ,NVL(FC.PRECISION, 2) ,NULL
,DECODE(PRL.TAX_ATTRIBUTE_UPDATE_CODE, 'CREATE',
NVL2(PRL.PARENT_REQ_LINE_ID, ZXLDET.TRX_BUSINESS_CATEGORY, NULL),
NULL ) ,DECODE(PRL.TAX_ATTRIBUTE_UPDATE_CODE, 'CREATE',
NVL2(PRL.PARENT_REQ_LINE_ID, ZXLDET.PRODUCT_CATEGORY, NULL), NULL )
,DECODE(PRL.TAX_ATTRIBUTE_UPDATE_CODE, 'CREATE',
NVL2(PRL.PARENT_REQ_LINE_ID, ZXLDET.PRODUCT_FISC_CLASSIFICATION,
NULL), NULL ) ,DECODE(PRL.TAX_ATTRIBUTE_UPDATE_CODE, 'CREATE',
NVL2(PRL.PARENT_REQ_LINE_ID, ZXLDET.LINE_INTENDED_USE, NULL), NULL )
,DECODE(PRL.TAX_ATTRIBUTE_UPDATE_CODE, 'CREATE',
NVL2(PRL.PARENT_REQ_LINE_ID, ZXLDET.PRODUCT_TYPE, NULL), NULL )
,DECODE(PRL.TAX_ATTRIBUTE_UPDATE_CODE, 'CREATE',
NVL2(PRL.PARENT_REQ_LINE_ID, ZXLDET.USER_DEFINED_FISC_CLASS, NULL),
NULL ) ,DECODE(PRL.TAX_ATTRIBUTE_UPDATE_CODE, 'CREATE',
NVL2(PRL.PARENT_REQ_LINE_ID, ZXLDET.ASSESSABLE_VALUE, NULL), NULL )
,DECODE(:B6 , 'REQIMPORT', PRL.TAX_NAME,
DECODE(PRL.TAX_ATTRIBUTE_UPDATE_CODE, 'CREATE',
NVL2(PRL.PARENT_REQ_LINE_ID, ZXLDET.INPUT_TAX_CLASSIFICATION_CODE,
NULL), NULL ) ) ,NVL((SELECT PRD.CODE_COMBINATION_ID FROM
PO_REQ_DISTRIBUTIONS_ALL PRD WHERE PRD.REQUISITION_LINE_ID =
PRL.REQUISITION_LINE_ID AND ROWNUM = 1), MSIB.EXPENSE_ACCOUNT )
,PV.VENDOR_ID ,PVS.VENDOR_SITE_ID ,PRL.LINE_NUM ,PRL.ITEM_DESCRIPTION
,PRL.ITEM_DESCRIPTION ,(SELECT 'Y' FROM DUAL WHERE :B6 = 'REQIMPORT'
AND PRL.TAX_NAME IS NOT NULL) ,PRL.DESTINATION_ORGANIZATION_ID FROM
PO_REQUISITION_HEADERS_ALL PRH, PO_REQUISITION_LINES_ALL PRL,
ZX_LINES_DET_FACTORS ZXLDET, PO_VENDORS PV, PO_VENDOR_SITES_ALL PVS,
MTL_SYSTEM_ITEMS_B MSIB, FND_CURRENCIES FC WHERE
PRH.REQUISITION_HEADER_ID = :B5 AND PRH.REQUISITION_HEADER_ID =
PRL.REQUISITION_HEADER_ID AND ZXLDET.APPLICATION_ID(+) = :B4 AND
ZXLDET.ENTITY_CODE(+) = :B3 AND ZXLDET.EVENT_CLASS_CODE(+) = :B2 AND
ZXLDET.TRX_LEVEL_TYPE(+) = :B1 AND ZXLDET.TRX_LINE_ID(+) =
PRL.PARENT_REQ_LINE_ID AND PV.VENDOR_ID(+) = PRL.VENDOR_ID AND
PVS.VENDOR_SITE_ID(+) = PRL.VENDOR_SITE_ID AND
MSIB.INVENTORY_ITEM_ID(+) = PRL.ITEM_ID AND MSIB.ORGANIZATION_ID(+) =
PRL.ORG_ID AND FC.CURRENCY_CODE(+) = PRL.CURRENCY_CODE AND
NVL(PRL.MODIFIED_BY_AGENT_FLAG, 'N') = 'N' AND NVL(PRL.CANCEL_FLAG,
'N') = 'N' AND NVL(PRL.CLOSED_CODE, 'OPEN') <> 'FINALLY CLOSED' AND
PRL.LINE_LOCATION_ID IS NULL AND PRL.AT_SOURCING_FLAG IS NULL
Rationale
SQL statement with SQL_ID "b3pnc5yctv2z5" was executed 3 times and had
an average elapsed time of 138 seconds.
Rationale
Average time spent in User I/O wait events per execution was 137
seconds.
Symptoms That Led to the Finding:
Wait class "User I/O" was consuming significant database time.
Impact is .7 active sessions, 13.57% of total activity.
Additional Information
Miscellaneous Information
Wait class "Application" was not consuming significant database time.
Wait class "Network" was not consuming significant database time.
Session connect and disconnect calls were not consuming significant database
time.
The database's maintenance windows were active during 100% of the analysis
period.
Regards
AthishFew days are am facing serious of performance problem in our Production instanceFor production issues, please log a SR.
Was this working before? If yes, any changes been done recently?
Do you have the statistics collected up to date?
Please see these docs.
AutoInvoice Performance Issue When Processing Tax [ID 1059275.1]
R12 : System Hangs When Attempting To Save Blanket Release After Applying Patch 11817843 [ID 1333336.1]
Thanks,
Hussein -
Performance issue in oracle 11.1.0.7 version
Hi ,
In production environment we have some cronjobs are scheduled, they will run every Saturday. One of the cronjob is taking more time to finish the job.
Previous oracle version is 10.2.0.4, that time it was taking 36hrs to complete it. After upgrading to 11gr1, now it's taking 47hrs some time 50hrs to finish.
I have asked my production DBA take AWR report after finish the cronjob.
Now he sent the AWR report, but i don't know how to read it. Can you please help me to read the AWR reports, and i need to give some recommendations to reduce the overall running time.
I don't know how to attach the AWR report here.
Please help me on this.
Thanks
Shravan KumarHi,
Now he sent the AWR report, but i don't know how to read it. Can you please help me to read the AWR reports, and i need to give some recommendations to reduce the overall running time.An't you a DBA? Probably you should seek help of you DBA to read the AWR and mean while you should also have AWR of 10g where this job was running previously so that you can compare the things.
Did you do a testing before upgrade? you SHOULD have done a thorough testing of your applications/reports before the upgrade and resolve the performance issues before the production upgrade.
Mean while you do investigation, you can set optimizer_features_enable=10.2.0.4 for only cron job session to check whether you job returns to same 26 hours time
alter session set optimizer_features_enable='10.2.0.4';Salman -
How should I report forum performance issues?
The forums rely heavily on the caching features of browsers to improve the speed of page rendering. Performance of these forums should greatly improve after a few pages because more and more of the images, css and javascript is cached in the browser. As a consequence, when reporting forums performance issues the report should include some information on the state of the browser cache to determine whether the issue is a browser issue or a server issue. Such detailed information is generally not available from just watching the browser screen, but needs to come from specialized tools such as performance monitor plugins and recording proxies.
The preferred report method for performance issues is to use the speed reporting features build into or available as a plugin for a browser for both the page you want to report a problem with and several refence pages in the site. Detailed instructions are listed below separated out for different browsers. If possible, please use Firefox for submitting the report because it provides an export format that can be read back electronically.
Known performance issues
The performance issues with any screen with a Rich Text Editor, such as the Reply window and the compose Private Message window have been acknowleged and improvements are being implemented.
Mozilla Firefox (preferred)
Warning: it is currently not recommended to generate a speed report when logged in. The speed report has enough detail for somebody else to hijack your session and impersonate you on the forums. If you really must report while logged in, make sure you log out your browser after generating the speed report and wait at least 4 hours before posting.
Install the Firebug plugin
Install the NetExport 0.6 extension for Firebug
Enable all Firebug panels
Switch to the "Net" panel in Firebug
Click on this link
Export the data from the Firebug Net panel
Click on this link
Export the data from the Firebug Net panel
Browse to the page where you are experiencing the performance problem.
Export the data from the Firebug Net panel
Click on this link
Export the data from the Firebug Net panel
Click on this link
Export the data from the Firebug Net panel
Browse to the page where you are experiencing the performance problem.
Export the data from the Firebug Net panel
When you report a performance problem please attach the 6 exports from the Firebug Net panel and an explanation of how you are experiencing the issues (for instance how much slower it is then normal) and include a description of your internet connection (dial-up, dsl, cable etc.) and the country from where you are connecting. If you have non-standard tweaks to your Firefox configuration (such as pipelining enabled) or are running any plugins please include that information in your report as well.
Google Chrome
Open the Developer Tools (Ctrl-Shift-J)
Navigate to the resources tab
Enable resource tracking.
Click on this link
Export the resource loading data.
Reset the data by disabling and enabling resource tracking
Click on this link
Export the data
Reset the data by disabling and enabling resource tracking
Navigate to the page where you experience the performance problem
Export the data
Reset the data by disabling and enabling resource tracking
Click on this link
Export the data
Reset the data by disabling and enabling resource tracking
Click on this link
Export the data
Reset the data by disabling and enabling resource tracking
Navigate to the page where you experience the performance problem
Export the data
Since Google Chrome does not have an export format for the Resource Tracking information best current practice is to take a screenshot and note the hover details for any resource with a tail that is longer then 25% of the total load time. When you report a performance problem please attach the screenshots and an explanation of how you are experiencing the issues (for instance how much slower it is then normal) and include a description of your internet connection (dial-up, dsl, cable etc.) and the country from where you are connecting.
Apple Safari
The Apple Safari Web Inspector has a Resources panel similar to the Resources panel in the Google Chrome developer tools.To get there, follow these steps:
Show the menu bar.
Go to preferences
Go to the Advanced Tab
Check “Show Develop menu in menu bar”.
From the Develop menu select “Show Web Inspector”.
Collecting the performance information and exporting works exactly the same as in Google Chrome. Please refer to the instructions for Google Chrome.
Microsoft Internet Explorer
IE does not have native features to analyze web traffic. No plugins have been found that produce the required information (please let us know if we missed any). For now, please reproduce the issue with Firefox, Chrome or Safari.
Please note that due to the reliance on Javascript for the interactive effects the performance of these forums will be much better on MS IE 8 then on previous versions of MS IE.Hi
It works, check once again...
regards
Swami -
Performance issue with pl/sql code
Hi Oracle Gurus,
I am in need of your recommendations for a performance issue that I am facing in production envrionment. There is a pl/sql procedure which executes with different elapsed time at different executions. Elapsed Times are 30minutes , 40 minutes, 65 minutes , 3 minutes ,3 seconds.
Expected elapsed time is maximum of 3 minutes. ( But some times it took 3 seconds too...! )
Output on all different executions are same that is deletion and insertion of 12K records into a table.
Here is the auto trace details of two different scenarios.
Slow execution - 33.65 minutes
Stat Name Statement Per Execution % Snap
Elapsed Time (ms) 1,712,343 1,712,342.6 41.4
CPU Time (ms) 1,679,689 1,679,688.6 44.7
Executions 1 N/A N/A
Buffer Gets ########## 167,257,973.0 86.9
Disk Reads 1,284 1,284.0 0.4
Parse Calls 1 1.0 0.0
User I/O Wait Time (ms) 4,264 N/A N/A
Cluster Wait Time (ms) 3,468 N/A N/A
Application Wait Time (ms) 0 N/A N/A
Concurrency Wait Time (ms) 6 N/A N/A
Invalidations 0 N/A N/A
Version Count 4 N/A N/A
Sharable Mem(KB) 85 N/A N/A
-------------------------------------------------------------Fast Exection : 5 seconds
Stat Name Statement Per Execution % Snap
Elapsed Time (ms) 41,550 41,550.3 0.7
CPU Time (ms) 40,776 40,776.3 1.0
Executions 1 N/A N/A
Buffer Gets 2,995,677 2,995,677.0 4.2
Disk Reads 22 22.0 0.0
Parse Calls 1 1.0 0.0
User I/O Wait Time (ms) 162 N/A N/A
Cluster Wait Time (ms) 621 N/A N/A
Application Wait Time (ms) 0 N/A N/A
Concurrency Wait Time (ms) 55 N/A N/A
Invalidations 0 N/A N/A
Version Count 4 N/A N/A
Sharable Mem(KB) 85 N/A N/A
-------------------------------------------------------------For security reasons, I cannot share the actual code. Its a report generating code that deletes and load the data into table using insert into select statement.
Delete from table ;
cursor X to get the master data ( 98 records )
For each X loop
insert into tableA select * from tables where a= X.a and b= X.b and c=X.c ..... ;
-- 12 K records inserted on average
insert into tableB select * from tables where a= X.a and b= X.b and c=X.c ..... ;
-- 12 K records inserted on average
end loop ;1. The select query is complex with bind variables ( explain plan varies for each values )
2. I have checked the tablespace of the tables involved, it is 82% used. DBA confirmed that it is not the reason.
3. Disk reads are high during long execution.
4. At long running times, I can see a db sequential read wait event on a index object. This index is on the table where data is inserted.
All I need to find is why this code is taking 3 seconds and 60 minutes on the same day and on the consecutive executions ?
Is there any other approach to find the root cause of this behaviour and to fix it ? Kindly adivse.
Thanks in advance your help.
Regards,
Hari
Edited by: BluShadow on 26-Sep-2012 08:24
edited to add {noformat}{noformat} tags. You've been a member long enough to know to do this yourself... so please do so in future. ({message:id=9360002})Hariharan ST wrote:
Hi Oracle Gurus,
I am in need of your recommendations for a performance issue that I am facing in production envrionment. There is a pl/sql procedure which executes with different elapsed time at different executions. Please reedit your post and add some code tags around the trace information. This would improve readability greatly and will help us to help you
example
{<b></b>code}
select * from dual;{<b></b>code}
Based upon your description I can imagine two things.
a) The execution plan for the select query does change frequently.
A typical reason can be not up to date statistics.
b) Some locking / wait conflict. For example upon a UK index.
Are there any other operations going on while it is slow? If anybody inserts a value, then your session will wait, if the same (PK/UK) value also is to be inserted.
Those wait events can be recognized using standard tools like oracle sql developer or enterprise manager while the query is slow.
Also go through the links that are in the FAQ. They tell you how to get better information for makeing a tuning request.
SQL and PL/SQL FAQ
Edited by: Sven W. on Sep 25, 2012 6:41 PM
Maybe you are looking for
-
Hi, I would like to add one day to a date. It seems like such a simple thing yet I have only found how to add a day to sysdate (or to add months to a given date). Any help? Thanks. Leah
-
Elements Organizer will not install correctly
I recently installed the latest AAM per Adobe's suggestion to solve nother problem of "installer failed to initialize". Now I can run the Elements setup.exe withough the failure. However, when I try to install Elements (either Photoshop or Premiere
-
How can i get a list of latest calls received
how can i get a list of latest calls received
-
HT1212 i dont want to restore my ipod. is there another way?
Is there anywhere in idaho that will be able to unlock my ipodtuch 4th gen. without restoring it?
-
For all entries from 2 tables that have no common key
Hello I have the next querry that i want to write in abap AUFK - >aufk-aufnr = afko- aufnr----> AFKO AUFK---->aufk-pspel = afvc-projn - >AFVC AFKO-----> afko-rsnum = resb-rsnum - > RESB AFVC-----> afvc-aufpl = resb-aufpl - > RES