IDOC in transformation step with multi mapping

Hello,
I have found this posting
Splitting a message into multiple Idocs
and now I am a little bit afraid that our planned process using BPM is not working:
a) XI receives an IDOC
b) XI continues with calling an external system sync.
c) Sync message response and IDOC are used to be merged into one new message M using transformation step (2 messages into 1 new)
d) send message M to receiver
Now I have read (see link) that IDOCs cannot be used in such multimapping steps. Is this true?
Can anybody give some information?
Best regards
Dirk

Hi Michal,
this answer gives hope!
So I think there is a misunderstanding in using the "multimapping" term?
Multimapping in a simple Interfacemapping for 1 sender to n receiver is different from the "multimapping" issue in a transformation step in BPM?
The central assumption in the mentioned blog was:
IDOC cannot be used in multimapping because IDOC adapter runs on ABAP engine.
In BPM transform step we are on Java side and using XML payload! So this will set us apart from the IDOC adapter ABAP engine issue?
That would be nice!
Regards
Dirk

Similar Messages

  • Problem with multi-mapping

    Hello everybody,
    we got a problem with multi-mapping.
    Source and target message-type are the same:
    <xsd:element name="MY_MESSAGE_TYPE">
    _<xsd:element name="BUSTRANS">
    __<xsd:element name="CHILD_1" maxOccurs="unbounded">
    ___<xsd:element name="SUB_CHILD_1" maxOccurs="unbounded">
    ____<xsd:element name="SUB_CHILD_1_NAME" type="xsd:string">
    __<xsd:element name="CHILD_2" maxOccurs="unbounded">
    ___<xsd:element name="SUB_CHILD_2" maxOccurs="unbounded">
    ____<xsd:element name="SUB_CHILD_2_NAME" type="xsd:string">
    The requirements are:
    <xsd:element name="MY_MESSAGE_TYPE"> should be created as often as <xsd:element name="CHILD_2"..> occurs
    a) so we mapped
    CHILD_2 -> MY_MESSAGE_TYPE
    BUSTRANS -> CopyValue -> BUSTRANS
    CHILD_1  -> CopyValue -> CHILD_1
    SUB_CHILD_1 -> CopyValue -> SUB_CHILD_1
    SUB_CHILD_1_NAME -> CopyValue -> SUB_CHILD_1_NAME
    CHILD_2 -> splitByValue(eachValue) -> CHILD_2
    The problem is:
    If we duplicated
    a) SUB_CHILD_1
    b) subtree CHILD_2 (so 2 messages will be generated)
    for testing, SUB_CHILD_1 only occurs 1 time! But we need it in every target message as often as it occurs in the source message.
    For your testing, here is the datatype:
    <?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>
    <xsd:schema xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" xmlns="http://enbw.com/XI/SAPCRMB2B/javamappings_test" targetNamespace="http://mynamespace.com/XI/SAPCRMB2B/javamappings_test">
    <xsd:complexType name="MultipleBookingOrderRequest">
    <xsd:sequence>
      <xsd:element name="BUSTRANS">
       <xsd:complexType>
        <xsd:sequence>
         <xsd:element name="CHILD_1" maxOccurs="unbounded">
          <xsd:complexType>
           <xsd:sequence>
            <xsd:element name="SUB_CHILD_1" maxOccurs="unbounded">
             <xsd:complexType>
              <xsd:sequence>
               <xsd:element name="SUB_CHILD_1_NAME" type="xsd:string">
               </xsd:element>
              </xsd:sequence>
             </xsd:complexType>
            </xsd:element>
           </xsd:sequence>
          </xsd:complexType>
         </xsd:element>
         <xsd:element name="CHILD_2" maxOccurs="unbounded">
          <xsd:complexType>
           <xsd:sequence>
            <xsd:element name="SUB_CHILD_2" maxOccurs="unbounded">
             <xsd:complexType>
              <xsd:sequence>
               <xsd:element name="SUB_CHILD_2_NAME" type="xsd:string">
               </xsd:element>
              </xsd:sequence>
             </xsd:complexType>
            </xsd:element>
           </xsd:sequence>
          </xsd:complexType>
         </xsd:element>
        </xsd:sequence>
       </xsd:complexType>
      </xsd:element>
    </xsd:sequence>
    </xsd:complexType>
    </xsd:schema>
    Regards
    Dominic

    Mario,
    <i>multimapping (split IDOC into several IDocs) is possible with IDocs. We did it!</i>
    Did you use IDOC packaging for this?
    AFAIK,when  you use multimapping that involves different adapters including one J2EE adapter and a IDOC adapter in the inbound side, multi mapping does not work.
    Regards,
    Bhavesh

  • XI Configuration Design questions with multi-mapping message mapping object

    Hello,
    I'm having trouble designing a particular scenario for multi-mapping.  Currently i'm working with a Vendor create and change.  BPM is not being used.
    This is what i need:
    I need a CREMDM04 to turn into one or multiple ADRMAS/CREMAS IDocs and potentially a CLFMAS IDoc based on the values in the inbound CREMDM04 IDoc.
    This is what i currently have:
    A CREMDM04 inbound idoc is multi-mapped to a CREMDM03 (1...9999), another CREMDM03 (0...9999), and a CLFMAS01 (0...9999).  At a minimum only the first CREMDM03 IDoc will be created and at a maximum all three will be created.  The parameters on creating the second CREMDM03 IDoc and the CLFMAS01 IDoc are based on the values in the inbound CREMDM04 IDoc, whereas the first CREMDM03 IDoc will always be created and the values will just be converted/mapped from the inbound CREMDM04 IDoc.  This multi-mapping is currently set-up via a graphical message map and works successfully in the test-tab of the mapping object.  It has a main message and has sub-messages which are the IDocs.  I’m mapping the CREMDM04 to a CREMDM03 to then map it through an ABAP-Class and then to an XSL where the CREMDM03 inbound structure is expected to split into ADRMAS and CREMAS Outbound IDocs for Vendor Create/Change in the remote R/3 systems.
    After the graphical map we have a necessary ABAP Class call that calls a BAPI to the remote system.  This ABAP Class must come after the graphical map since the parameter for the BAPI is based on a converted value from the graphical multi-map.
    After the ABAP Class call there is finally an XSL message split the CREMDM IDoc into an ADRMAS and CREMAS IDoc.  There need to be two interface mappings (one per ADRMAS and CREMAS) since the ABAP classes and XSLs are specific to the ADRMAS and CREMAS.
    The CLFMAS IDoc can go directly to the remote system, but since it’s within this one multi-map, I’m not sure if is possible?  I’m not sure if it will fail once it tries entering the XSL mapping (this is the standard CREMDM message split offered from SAP).
    There are three interface mapping scenarios I can think of, but cannot get to work:
    CREMDM04 to ADRMAS02
    CREMDM04 to CREMAS03
    CREMDM04 to CLFMAS01
    Currently I have the Interface Mapping structured as follows:  (I cannot get this to activate as it appears it does not work)
    Multi-Mapping ==> ABAP Class Call ==> Standard XSL Message Split
    How should i design the interface mapping objects and the configuration objects for this scenario?
    Any help is appreciated and I definitely will reward points (no need to include it in your response).

    Hi,
    I suggest you may use multiple steps interface mapping. It's composited with 3 message mappings as step by step.
    Mapping 1: One to one mapping. For the output schema, use a composition schema which includes those 3 IDOCs you want.
    Mappign 2: ABAP Mapping. I am not sure the ABAP class you mentioned is an ABAP mapping or not. If it does, That's ok. If not,
    call that ABAP class in your ABAP mapping and do corresponding change for your message. Return back the same structure as output.
    Mapping 3: One to multiple mapping to split the message.
    So basically as interface mapping, it's one to multiple mapping. And internally, you have 3 steps to realize the mapping.
    And as my experience, for both one to multiple message mapping & multiple steps interface mapping, it works well in my project. And
    in ID, you have to configure it via "advance" function in receiver determination or interface determination.
    Let me know if any confusion.
    Thanks
    Nick

  • IDoc Package to File using Multi Mapping urjent

    Hi Experts,
    I have a scenario where PI 7.1 need to receive IDocs in a package and should send three files to target system. I am using multi mapping concept here, where i have created one message mapping, one operation mapping with three interfaces specified in it. I am getting the error "Inbound interface found several times (for same sender and receiver) for the outbound interface" .

    Hi,
    Please make occurence of the message type in message mapping as 0..unbounded.
    Also in operation mapping the occurence of inbound interface as 0..unbounded.
    Also now in configuration-->interface determination... access the new operation mapping.... u will c the occurence as 0..unbounded. Refresh the cache ad execute it once more...
    Let us know the result...
    Babu
    Edited by: hlbabu123 on Apr 3, 2010 1:16 PM

  • Question with multi-mapping 1:n split scenario

    Hi
        I have a scenario with the following requirement
    R3 --> XI --> Multiple files
    I used a multi-mapping scenario  using message mapping. to get the following output
    <ns0:Messages xmlns:ns0="http://sap.com/xi/XI/SplitAndMerge">
    <ns0:Message1>
    <Transaction> </Transaction>
    <Transaction> </Transaction>
    </ns0:Message1>
    <ns0:Messages>
    Each  <Transaction> </Transaction>  produces a file in runtime. So far so good.
    Now, there was a new requirement to introduce a dtd line as the first line  in each of the target files created  - that looks like follows :
    <!DOCTYPE Transaction PUBLIC \"-//XXXXX//DTD BatchReceiptAuthorization//EN\" \"http://dtd.XXXXX.com/dtds/ReceiptAuthorization.dtd\">
    How do I go about introducing this header line above the <Transaction> node in each and every target file - that is created by multi-mapping  ? This header line is not a part of the target schema and hence cannot be mapped to as an constant element in the target.
    Any suggestions/ideas as to how this can be done ?

    Hi Gautam
        I did use a java mapping , as a second step after the message mapping - so that the dtd line can be introduced as a header for each target message/file written by the muti-mapping in the first step.
         In my scenario, I sent the inputstream that is being passed to the Java execute method  - to trace and I see that the whole of the xml file - as shown below - which is the output of message mapping ( from the first mapping step ) in sent to the execute method of the java mapping a single call
    <ns0:Messages xmlns:ns0="http://sap.com/xi/XI/SplitAndMerge">
    <ns0:Message1>
    <Transaction> </Transaction>
    <Transaction> </Transaction>
    </ns0:Message1>
    <ns0:Messages>
    So, I modified Java mapping program to look for multiple occurences of <Transaction> tag and prefix them with my constant DTD Literal - which is the primary reason , why I had to use Java mappings after the message mapping.
    Now, I get an error is XI- SXMB_MONI
    - <SAP:Error xmlns:SAP="http://sap.com/xi/XI/Message/30" xmlns:SOAP="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/" SOAP:mustUnderstand="">
    <SAP:Category>XIServer</SAP:Category>
    <SAP:Code area="MAPPING" />
    <SAP:P1>unexpected symbol; expected '<'</', entity refe</SAP:P1>
    <SAP:P2>rence, character data, CDATA section, processing i</SAP:P2>
    <SAP:P3>0</SAP:P3>
    <SAP:P4>113</SAP:P4>
    <SAP:AdditionalText />
    <SAP:ApplicationFaultMessage namespace="" />
    <SAP:Stack>The exception occurred (program: CL_XMS_MAIN===================CP, include CL_XMS_MAIN===================CM00A, line: 609)</SAP:Stack>
    <SAP:Retry>M</SAP:Retry>
    </SAP:Error>
    Can you help me out here ?

  • ** Transformation step - 1:n mapping error - BPM

    Hi friends,
    In my BPM transformation step I am doing 1:n mapping. I created & tested the message mapping and Interface mapping for this. Its working fine there. But, while I put the payload, the message is not splitted. Instead only the first message is splitted.
    Source Payload
    <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
    <ns0:PurchaseOrder xmlns:ns0="http://www.XYZ.com/ABCD/SDFunctions">
    <row>
    <PONO>5005</PONO>
    <PODATE>2008-06-09</PODATE>
    <VENDOR_CODE>0000100614</VENDOR_CODE>
    <REFERENCE>PENA</REFERENCE>
    <MATERIAL_CODE>100-00</MATERIAL_CODE>
    <ORDER_QTY>1</ORDER_QTY>
    </row>
    <row>
    <PONO>5006</PONO>
    <PODATE>2008-06-09</PODATE>
    <VENDOR_CODE>0000100614</VENDOR_CODE>
    <REFERENCE>PENA-1</REFERENCE>
    <MATERIAL_CODE>100-100</MATERIAL_CODE>
    <ORDER_QTY>4</ORDER_QTY>
    </row>
    </ns0:PurchaseOrder>
    But, only the message is splitted comes in SXMB_MONI with the following error.
    HTTP response contains status code 500 with the description Timeout Error while sending by HTTP (error code: 500, error text: Timeout)</
    What could be the problem ? Why second message is not splitted. Is it required to add any Receiver Determination step in ID ?
    Kindly tell me, friends.
    Thanking you.
    Kind Regards,
    Jeg P.

    Hi friends,
    I have corrected Message Mapping and Interface Mapping. If I send 2 message (source), I will get only 1 message in the target side. (after transformation)
    In my BPM design, after 'Transformation' step, one block is there, I set property Mode as 'For Each', and I set Multiline Element.
    Now, the 500 Internal Server problem has gone. But, why the 2nd message is not entered into block ?

  • Need help with multi-mapping

    Hello! I need to develop scenario like in blog: /people/narendra.jain/blog/2005/12/30/various-multi-mappings-and-optimizing-their-implementation-in-integration-processes-bpm-in-xi
    but I need to have sets of records. For example, I have 9 "Element2" records in original message.
    So, I  need to have 3 messages, each contains 3 records of "Element2".
    How can I do this?

    Change the occurance of target message type to 0..unbounded in Messages Tab in mapping for 1:n mapping.
    Mapping for Piyush_msg_out_3 target node-
    Element2 (source)-> Index(increment 1) -> Divide by Constant (3 in your case) -> Floor -> Split By value(Value chnaged) -> collapse contexts -> Piyush_msg_out_3
    Change the occurance of Element2 node as 1..unbounded in target data type.
    Mapping for Element2-
    Element2 (source)-> Index(increment 1) -> Divide by Constant (3 in your case) -> Floor -> Split By value(Value chnaged)  -> Element2(target)
    Edited by: nagarjuna _s on Nov 5, 2009 7:41 AM

  • Abap cleint proxy with Multi mapping

    Hi folks,
    In this senario i am using client proxy to jdbc.
    but my client proxy is generating input file
    - <n0:MT_xxx_SAP xmlns:n0="http://xxxxx/bbb/HR/002/SAP_to_yyyy" xmlns:prx="urn:sap.com:proxy:RD1::700:2008/01/11">
    - <row>
      <BUKRS>This is a string 11</BUKRS>
      <WERKS>This is a string 12</WERKS>
      <BTRTL>This is a string 13</BTRTL>
      <NAME1>This is a string 14</NAME1>
      <BTEXT>This is a string 15</BTEXT>
      </row>
    - <row>
      <BUKRS>This is a string 16</BUKRS>
      <WERKS>This is a string 17</WERKS>
      <BTRTL>This is a string 18</BTRTL>
      <NAME1>This is a string 19</NAME1>
      <BTEXT>This is a string 20</BTEXT>
      </row>
      </n0:MT_xxx_SAP>
    but in message mapping the input xml is excepting as
    <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
    <ns0:Messages xmlns:ns0="http://sap.com/xi/XI/SplitAndMerge">
       <ns0:Message1>
          <ns1:MT_xxx_SAP xmlns:ns1="http://xxxx/yyy/HR/002/SAP_to_jjjjj">
             <row>
                <BUKRS>4654</BUKRS>
                <WERKS>321</WERKS>
                <BTRTL>5545</BTRTL>
                <NAME1>khghjg</NAME1>
                <BTEXT>jhdhgdg</BTEXT>
             </row>
          </ns1:MT_xxx_SAP>
       </ns0:Message1>
    </ns0:Messages>
    how to handle this <ns0:Messages xmlns:ns0="http://sap.com/xi/XI/SplitAndMerge">
       <ns0:Message1>
    which is autometically generating in message mapping..
    Regards
    Vijay

    Hi,
    your msg mapping is not generating target node.........so in your msg mapping, map the target header node to source header node.......msg1 to msg1......then map the target msg type to source row node.............then take SXMB_MONI payload and test your msg mapping to see if target node is getting generated............
    Regards,
    Rajeev Gupta
    Edited by: RAJEEV GUPTA on Feb 9, 2009 2:44 PM

  • Multi Mapping - Receiver IDOC & Mail with BPM

    Hi,
    Is it possible to use BPM with Multi Mapping for IDOC & Mail receivers sent parallely..
    Appreciate your help ..
    Thanks,
    vasanth.

    Hi Michal,
    Thanks Michal,
    We are using PI 7.1, Our Scope to do File to IDOC & Mail scenario in between we have to do RFC Lookups..
    Could you pls guide me thru the steps fo BPM,
    1 SA -> OB to AA
    2 ID  -> OB to AA & AA to Recv
    3.RD -> OB to AA & AA to Recv
    4.RA -> AA to IB & AA to IB
    Correct me if i'm wrong..
    Clarification : Is there is any way out to implement this scenario with out BPM.
    We already implemented this scenario with 2 MM & 2 OM, Scenario works fine...but we have to use 1 Mapping..
    Appreciate your help in advance..
    Thanks,
    vasanth.

  • Handling Java Mapping Exception in BPM Transformation step

    Dear SDN members,
    I have developed a File to File scenario using BPM as follows.
    Step 1:
    Sender file adapter picks the file from FTP server and using file content conversion mapped to XML structure.
    Step 2:
    BPM will recieve the XML payload , immediately in the block a transformation step is called with an interface mapping. In the interface mapping a Java mapping will be executed with certain data validations on the XML payload. If found any invalid data is there a suitable excptions will be raised . Here the transformation step should be catch the error and control should be sent to exception block to place the recived file as a error file.
    else if the transformation is executed with out any issues, the file will be placed in success folder.
    But in the transformation step, though java mapping thorwing exceptions, the control not going into exception block, instead it is continuing to next step i.e the file is placing in the success folder.
    Can anybody tell me, how to handle the exceptions raised in java mapping in the BPM transformation step?
    I have refered all the SDN blogs, forums related to this issue, but could not able to find the answer. Please help me?
    Thanks & Regards
    Vijayanand Poreddy

    Hi Abhishek,
    Once the file is picked from FTP server then sent to BPM,
    the BPM steps
    Step1:
    -->Recive
    Step 2:
    Block Starts
       ---Block Start: New Transaction
       ---Block End : New Transaction
       ---Exception : Error
    Step 3 
    Inside the Block
    Transformation Step
       --Interface Mapping: <IM Name>
       -- Check box ticked for Create New Transcation
       -- Exceptions
          --System Error: Error
       --Source Message: Message recieved in Recieve Step (Step 1)
    Step 4:
      --Send
      --Source Maessage: Output message from the Transformation Step
    Block End
    Inserted a Exception Branch for Block
    Steps inside Exception Branch
      -Control
        --Throw Alert
       --Alert Name
    In the above scenario
    The transformation step is not throwing error even my interface mapping going to error. The same transformation step if i place outside the block next to recieve step, then the transformation step is throwing error and BPM stops the process.
    Also, when transformation is inside the block, i have used the exception handling on the send step inside the block. here it is throwing error as the source message payload is empty. because in the preceding transformation step the interface mapping is failed due to which there the target will not be filled. But even though it is not entered into exception block.
    Regards
    Vijayanand Poreddy

  • Multi-mapping for ibound IDOC

    Hi! All
    It would be of great help if you provide your suggestions on:
    Mapping one XML source file to 6 IDOC receivers, 2 of them are of the same type and 4 are distinct idoc types.
    I tried multi-mapping and received the following error:
    "Messages in multi-message format can only be sent to one Adapter Engine"
    Looks like IDOC adapter does not support multi mapping...
    Can you please suggest any other option apart from using BPM(since it consumes lot of resources).
    Thanks a lot!!
    Regards,
    Patrick

    Hey
    its not possible to do Multimapping over IDOC's without BPM.
    other way around can be to do a single -single scenario,suppose u have 6 IDOC's to post then u need to design 6 different scenarios for them.
    without BPM you cant do multimapping for IDOC or HTTP
    Thanx
    Aamir
    Message was edited by:
            Aamir Suhail

  • BPM Multi Mapping to diffrend receivers

    Hello All,
    i have to deploy an bpm process with 1:N mapping and different receivers
    i have an receive step an  transformation step for the mapping and
    two send steps each in an block to send single messages to the receivers.
    my problem is:
    say the input Message has 4 Subtrees so after the Mapping i have 4 Messages for receiver1 and 4 Messages for receiver2
    BMP send all 4 Messages to receiver1 and then all 4 messages to receiver2
    but i want to send message1 tor receiver1 , then message 1 to receiver2
    so that the pattern is like this:
    MSG1Rec1, MSG1Rec2
    MSG2Rec1, MSG2Rec2
    MSG3Rec1, MSG3Rec2
    is this possible with bpm.
    Multi Mapping without bpm is not possible
    regards ralf

    Hi  Marshal  
    receiver is abap proxy and not adapter engine
    operation mapping is like this
    source_operation1   => target_Operation1   0..unboundet
                                     => target_Operation2   0..unboundet
    in message mapping
    source_Message1    => target_Message1  0.. unbound
                                      => target_Message2  0..unbound
    all work fine but in bpm i need two blocks pareach to send the messages to target.
    and bpm will work first block1 and then block 2
    i need a block for both sender steps but ???

  • Transformation step in ccBPM scenario

    Hi There,
    I have a scenario like this:
    File -> ccBPM -> BAPI
    I am using the Transformation step(1:1) in the ccBPM Scenario. I have supplied, interface mapping, source  message (File name), target message (name) in the properties of the 'Transformation step'.
    The scenario is currently failing at the Transformation step with a error message,"Expression must return the interface type Z_MYBAPI"
    Any thoughts on this issue?
    Thanks,
    Raghu

    Hi Raghu,
    Check these:
    1) Interface Mapping (shoould be between Abstract Interface).
    2) Source Message and Target Message in transformation should be Abstract.
    Hope these will help you.
    Regards
    Suraj

  • Making correct use of Mappings: Transformation Step in BPE

    Hi everybody,
    in SAP Docu, I found the recommendation to use Transformation Step only for those kind of mappings that cannot be done in the Integration Engine (e.g. n:1 mappings)
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/d5/be364296f1b26be10000000a155106/frameset.htm
    Can anybody give me the rationale behind this recommendation?
    regards,
    Peter

    Peter,
    That's because u have to use BPM for n:1 or 1:n type of mappings.It can't be done through normal map programs.Hence for the better design if u have normal map then u can perform mappings either before where BPM receive step will receive transformed message or after BPM where maps source message would be fetched from BPM.
    Technically BPM transform step is the part of the workflow and it communicates with Java stack for mappings.Thus I guess eliminating Transformation step in normal map would reduce this communication time and thus improves the performance of the interface.
    Regards
    Rajeev

  • Problem with Mulit Mapping/Message Split

    Hi,
    I am a newbie to XI trying to set up a file2file scenario with multi-mapping/message splitting without BPM.
    System is XI 3.0 SP14
    Scenario is:
    read an XML-File and multiply it and write 2 XML-files using the File adaptor.
    For reference I used "multimapping without BPM".
    - setting occurancy of Message types to unbounded in both Message Mapping and Interface Mapping.
    - using the RB_Split button
    - setting up one business service containing 2 message interfaces and 2 communication channels for output.
    Designing and Konfiguring worked fine.
    File is read but no file is written.
    XML-Moni tells me "Mapping did not create Messages" 
    I did extensive studies in sap.help, forum and various blogs. Also to verify Messagetypes and Kommunication channels I set up similar file2file scenario without splitting. Nothing really helped.
    Any clues?

    Hi again,
    very efficient method to test XML-source file. - Thanks.
    Unfortunately it did not solve my problem.
    Again: "Split mapping did not create messages"
    Below you can find a part of the trace created when processing this message:
    <Trace level="3" type="T">Multi mapping required.</Trace>
      <Trace level="3" type="T">Creating Java mapping com/sap/xi/tf/_MM_data_duplic_async_.</Trace>
      <Trace level="3" type="T">Load ac6179b0-a92e-11da-be15-e51f0a000472, http://MyTutorial/SHeinz05, -1, com/sap/xi/tf/_MM_data_duplic_async_.class.</Trace>
      <Trace level="3" type="T">Search com/sap/xi/tf/_MM_data_duplic_async_.class (http://MyTutorial/SHeinz05, -1) in swcv ac6179b0-a92e-11da-be15-e51f0a000472.</Trace>
      <Trace level="3" type="T">Loaded class com.sap.xi.tf._MM_data_duplic_async_</Trace>
      <Trace level="2" type="T">Call method execute of the application Java mapping com.sap.xi.tf._MM_data_duplic_async_</Trace>
      <Trace level="2" type="T">Java mapping com/sap/xi/tf/_MM_data_duplic_async_ completed. (executeStep() of com.sap.xi.tf._MM_data_duplic_async_</Trace>
      <Trace level="3" type="T">Nachrichtentyp 1 Anzahl der Nachrichten 0</Trace>
      <Trace level="3" type="T">Nachrichtentyp 2 Anzahl der Nachrichten 0</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="E">CL_XMS_PLSRV_MAPPING~ENTER_PLSRV</Trace>
      </Trace>
    - <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-WRITE_MESSAGE_LOG_TO_PERSIST">
      <Trace level="3" type="T">Persisting message after plsrv call</Trace>
      <Trace level="3" type="T">Message-Version = 005</Trace>
      <Trace level="3" type="T">Message version 005</Trace>
      <Trace level="3" type="T">Pipeline CENTRAL</Trace>
      </Trace>
      <Trace level="3" type="System_Error">Error exception return from pipeline processing!</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-WRITE_MESSAGE_TO_PERSIST" />
    - <!--  ************************************
      -->
      <Trace level="3" type="T">Persisting message Status = 014</Trace>
      <Trace level="3" type="T">Message version 006</Trace>
      <Trace level="3" type="T">Pipeline CENTRAL</Trace>
      </SAP:Trace>
    Test of MM and IM is always successful.
    Any clues?

Maybe you are looking for

  • Reccomendations needed for NVIDIA GeForce 7300 GT replacement.

    I just had my third NVIDIA GeForce 7300 GT graphics card fail (got them replaced through Apple Care which has now expired). I need to get a replacement graphics card but do not want another one of these! Specs on my '07 Mac Pro:   Model Name:    Mac

  • RFC ADAPTER destination hangs

    To All I am working on a XI 7.0 system SP5 for netweaver 2004s and am having problems with the RFC adapter. Steps as follows:- 1.Configure SM59 tcp ip destination on r/3(4.6C) sender system using Xi system host and gateway service 2. step 2 - configu

  • Addenda Record ACH CTX

    Hi All, I have copied the ZFI_PAYMEDIUM_ACH_00,ZFI_PAYMEDIUM_ACH_05,ZFI_PAYMEDIUM_ACH_20,ZFI_PAYMEDIUM_ACH_30 and replaced the standard FM's My question is regarding Addenda Record Segments For Ex: GS Segment FORM CONSTRUCT_ADDN_BEGIN TABLES  T_PAYME

  • Regarding line item dimension

    Hi all, what are the necessary prerequisities will u take regarding line item dimension. for eg., for sd cubes we r using sales doc no., i.obj as a line item dimension? why can't the other i.obj? plz explain me clearly? Thanks & Regards, V.Vijay.

  • Polling in webservice scenario

    Hi Experts, I know Sender File Adapter and JDBC Adapter supports polling. Is it possible to use polling in webservice scenario? Is it possible to expose a File Adapter and JDBC Adpaters scenarios as a webserice? Regards Sara