IDOC Negative acknowledge not triggering system Exception

Hi guys,
I've a send step in my BPM which sends an IDOC and waits for the application acknowledge. After watching several threads, and specially SAP Note 837285, we can read that:
"Permanent negative acknowledgements: If the BPE receives a
permanent negative system or application acknowledgment, the
asynchronous send step waiting for it triggers a system error for
which you can define an exception handling."
Well, in my send step I've placed a system exception for handling this negative acknowledges but eventough I'm getting the negative application acknowlege from R3 (in SXMB_MONI I get the ack figure with a red cross indicating 'Ackonwledgment contains applic. errors'), the BPE doesn't trigger the system exception. Instead it enters in my deadline branch after quite a long time, ending the process....
Can you guys give me a hand?

Hi Ravi,
What is happening is:
After the idoc reaches R3, the Send step begins waiting for the ALEAUD ack from R3. I've got a System Exception for handling negative acks and a deadline branch for communication errors during the sending step... Meanwhile, the negative ack reaches XI (I can see it on the SXMB_MONI of XI) but the send step still waits for the ack. Of course, after the timeframe which was set for the deadline branch, the bpm will be completed because it jumps to that branch.
I can't figure it out why isn't the BPM catching the negative acknowledges..... :S If the acknowledge is error-free, the send step catches it and proceeds to the next step....
Any ideas? suggestions....? crazy attempts....?
The only point possible is the acknowledge received not being a permanent negative ack but a transient negative ack.... How can I check this IMPORTANT point.... ?
Message was edited by:
Gonçalo Mouro Vaz

Similar Messages

IDoc - JDBC, acknowledgment not possible

Hi Guys.
I've this scenario, It makes a branch, to a BPM and to a JDBC. The problem is, i got an error at the JDBC acknowledgment response (Acknowledgment not possible)
                        IDOC
Branch
               BPM                 JDBC
          No errors              Acknowledgment
        in acknowledgment        not possible
This scenario was made by a external consultant, and i don't know where is the JDBC acknowledgment defined.
Does anyone know, where can i modified this and disable the acknowledgment response for the JDBC?
Thanks in advance.

HI,
Go to BPM and check the Send Step .. Is it has mode as acknowledgement etc ?
Also check is Exception Branch has been defined ?
to suppress the ack for Idoc -[page no 10 - entry in table IDXNOALE in XI system
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/f6d2d790-0201-0010-9382-b50b499b3fbe
Regards,
Moorthy

IDOC send step not running with exception in BPM?

Hello,
hope this is a simple question, but we are running with a problem here which is not answered well in SAP help or sdn. Possibly I didn´t find the right blog.
Situation:
We created a BPM with a send step (IDOC receiver) in a block (after a receive step starting the BPM) (That´s simple so far!).
The send step (async IDOC) in the block is connected in its attributes in field "system error" to an exception branch defined in the same block.
In this except.branch the process should send back to sender system a message via RFC and the last step in this exception branch is to interrupt the proces.
But now we tried to do a test. In this test we modified the receiver address of the send step (IDOC reciver) so that the receiver could not be reached, which results in a system error in SXMB_MONI (Service unavailable).
But this doesn´t work. The BPM starts the send step to the unavailable receiver, SXMB_MONI shows a system error step, but then the BPM continues with the next step after the block without starting the exception branch.
Any idea why the exception branch is not called?
Best regards
Dirk

Hello again,
we are one step further now.
We did the same with an RFC instead of the IDOC send step.
Same result:
The service is not reachable. So the step results in an system error.
But as we could see in the monitoring SXMB_MONI the block with the exception and this send step (RFC) is passed before the step gives back this error!
So it looks like connection problems do not trigger an exception?
Any help is welcome!
Best regards
Dirk

IDOC created but not stored: No exception also

Hi All,
My scenario is that to upload the data from excel file and create inbound delivery. I am using the fm IDOC_INPUT_DESADV1. IBD and IDOC has been created but mot saved.
if I goto vl32n, There is no IBD and if i goto WE02 then there is No IDOC. No exception also.
Thanks with Regards,
Vallamuthu M

Hi,
Thanks for all your updates. Not able to create IBD using IDOC_INPUT_DESADV1 in progran(SE38). I am using the following function modules. it's created IDOC and IBD. Now my problem is that how to create batch and serial number. I have given batch number in E1EDL24-CHARG and serial number E1EDL11-SERNR. It's create IBD with out the given batch number and serial number.
call function 'IDOC_INBOUND_WRITE_TO_DB'
    TABLES
      t_data_records    = gt_idoc_data
*     T_LINKED_OBJECTS =
    CHANGING
      pc_control_record = gs_idoc_contrl
    EXCEPTIONS
      idoc_not_saved    = 1
      OTHERS            = 2.
IF sy-subrc = 0.
    APPEND gs_idoc_contrl TO gt_idoc_contrl.
    CALL FUNCTION 'IDOC_START_INBOUND'
      EXPORTING
*       PI_INBOUND_PROCESS_DATA       = ' '
        pi_called_online              = 'X'
*       PI_DO_COMMIT                  = 'X'
*       PI_START_EVENT_ENABLED        = 'X'
*       PI_ORG_UNIT                   = ' '
        succ_show_flag                = 'X'
*       PI_PARTNER_OPTION             =
      TABLES
        t_control_records             = gt_idoc_contrl
*       T_DATA_RECORDS                =
      EXCEPTIONS
        invalid_document_number       = 1
        error_before_call_application = 2
        inbound_process_not_possible = 3
        old_wf_start_failed           = 4
        wf_task_error                 = 5
        serious_inbound_error         = 6
        OTHERS                        = 7.
    IF sy-subrc <> 0.
* Implement suitable error handling here
    ENDIF.
ENDIF.

PRD is not triggering in Negative Stocks allowed scenario

I am trying to do Subcontracting process with Negative Stocks allowed for the final material and raw materials even & all of them are checked for negative stocks allowed. When I am trying to issue, say 10 units of materials to SC Vendor with ZERO stocks in storage, the stock's updating accordingly as 10-, but while doing MIGO for say 5 units, the stock's updating accordingly, but in FI documents so created, the PRD key is missing. I read bout PRD and it states : Price differences can also arise in the case of materials with moving average price if there is not enough stock to cover the invoiced quantity. In the case of goods movements in the negative range, the moving average price is not changed. Instead, any price differences arising are posted to a price difference account. Depending on the settings for the posting rules for transaction/event key PRD, it is possible to work with or without account modification. If you use account modification, the following modifications are available in the standard system. So, what steps are to be taken in order to trigger PRD key in the FI Documents.
Regards,
Sowmyesh Maniyar

Sowmyesh Maniyar wrote:
I read bout PRD and it states : Price differences can also arise in the case of materials with moving average price if there is not enough stock to cover the invoiced quantity.
Yes its correct.. At the time MIRO, if any price difference occurs, then first system checks stock is available or not.. If stock is there then system will take the amount from stock account, if not, then system take the amount in PRD account...
But here you have activated negative stock. I think because of this your stock account triggered instead of PRD account..
Can you check and analysis the accounting entry, where the price different amount goes ?

Invoice posting is not triggering idoc message in EBP to FI backned ECC6

Hi ,
We are working on classic scenario with SRM 5 having EBP and SUS on separate clients on same srm system.
Now we are extending standlone scenario for selected product categories .
We have created product master ,product category & vendor master in SRM EBP client. Defined below settings
1.Define Sourcing for Product Categories -local
2.Define Objects in Backend System -EBP of type Local
3.Define G/L Account for Product Category and Account Assignmet
We are able to create Shpping cart ->purchase order( local)->confirm goods & invoice for local product
With central ccountant authorization employee user has created the invoice and resulted status of invoice as
"Currently Being Transferred" , expected   to post the invoice in ECC system but after invoice idoc is not getting generated in SRM in order to transferred to backend ?
I have tried and in debug mode found that ,Logical System of Logistics Backend is wrongly
attached to invoice ie instead of ECC logical system it is appearing SRM Local logical system . After changing the
backend value for invoice header -BE_LOG_SYSTEM from srm to ecc backend & executed
FM-BBP_PROCDOC_TRANSFER for particular invoice ,Idoc Basic type        BBPIV01 is generated and passed to ecc.
But not able to identify why wrong "Logistic backend " is appeared in invoice. we have below attributes maintained in
Employee
Accounting System for Vendor     VENDOR_ACS     DSRCLNT254(SRM local)
Company Code                                         BUK     100
Cost Center                                                               CNT     430900
System Alias                                                         SYS     LOGSYS250
System Alias for Accounting Systems                   ACS     DSRCLNT254
System Alias for Vendor                                      VENDOR_SYS     LOGSYS250
Vendor
Accounting System for Vendor     VENDOR_ACS     LOGSYS250(ECC)
Company Code                           BUK                            100
System Alias for Vendor                      VENDOR_SYS                            LOGSYS250(ECC)
Kindly help me to post the invoice to ECC backend ,

Thanks Sheetal,
We have classic scenario in place so ECC system (LOGSYS250 ) is defined as backend system of type- ERP_2.0   &
FIvalid- realtime backend validation .
We are using ECC is the accounting system defined in the configuration setting Define Backend Systems.
Note: More to add that Invocie idoc generated after backend logical system correction in invoice header data of SRM ,
it is posting invoice successfully in eCC backend . So data correction for logical system value is seems some problem with standlone scenario configuration .
We have validating this scenario for selectd product categories as with SRM 5 version in place, customer is intrested to use Invoice management system ie.   invoice should be validated with exceptions in SRM before posting to ECC.
We have EBP & SUS in different client on SRM system ,so in existing classical scenario   invoices created in SUS against ECC backned purchase orders is not flowing to IMS in EBP . Can you help me to validate the scenario ?
Regards,
Santosh
Edited by: Patil Santosh D on Oct 2, 2009 1:51 PM
Edited by: Patil Santosh D on Oct 5, 2009 11:37 AM
Edited by: Patil Santosh D on Oct 9, 2009 7:38 AM.
Issue is resolved . It is the System Alias for Accounting Systems setting in organization module .
Now with completion of workflow idoc message-BBPIV is generated in SRM and successfully posting in ECC.
Thanks a lot for your inputs .

XI IDoc Acknowledgement - Acknowledgement not possible status

Hi Experts,
My scenario:
SAP IDOC - XI - jdbc (oracle)
Problem:
Getting the infamous "Acknowledgement not possible" status in SXI_MONI. I only need the transport acknowledgements back to SAP not the application acknowledgements. The messages themselves route fine from source to destination.

check if this blog helps you:
/people/saravanakumar.kuppusamy2/blog/2005/01/20/configuration-tips-for-a-business-serviceintegration-process-to-send-back-ale-audit-idoc
From the blog:
The system acknowledgement sent by the file adapter is converted into an ALE audit message and sent
back to the sender SAP system by an IDOC ACK channel configured in XI(an IDOC receiver adapter).
For your info:
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/903a0abc-e56e-2910-51a8-9dc616df56eb
Edited by: abhishek salvi on May 15, 2009 10:48 AM

IDOC message type LOIPLO not triggering

Hi Friends
Our client want to send firmed planned orders to External system through outbound IDOC LOIPLO
So we are using MF50 to firm the planned orders.
The idoc message type LOIPLO is not triggering.
How to trigger IDOC message type LOIPLO . What are the settings we have to do.
Regards,
Srihari.M

dear friend,
Message Type : LOIPLO
Basic Type : LOIPLO01
You need not create any custom IDOC type as we are having a standard IDOC type available within SAP, but you need to write a custom function module to read the data from the IDOC segments and then call the below BAPI to post the Planned Order.
Check the input parameters of BAPI and gothrough the documentation of the Basic Type in WE60 transactions, whether all the necessary input parameters of the BAPI are covered in the standard IDOC type, if not then we need to customize the standard basic type to meet the requirements.
Bapi which needs to be used is BAPI_PLANNEDORDER_CREATE
good luck!

Reg : change pointer mechanism for triggering the IDOC for delivery note

Hi ,
I am working on a change pointer mechanism for triggering the IDOC for delivery note and will be using this message class DESADV.
So SAP has suggested for assigning the message class DESADV with the function module in MASTERIDOC_CREATE_SMD_DESADV in BD60 transaction code.
So I was looking to create this MASTERIDOC_CREATE_SMD_DESADV function module in SAP and SAP suggesting that we should create this MASTERIDOC_CREATE_SMD_DESADV function module as same as the function module MASTERIDOC_CREATE_SMD_MATMAS.
So do anyone knows that is there any tool has been provided by SAP for creating this function module MASTERIDOC_CREATE_SMD_DESADV in SAP system for triggering the change pointer mechanism for outbound Delivery.
Thanks !
Regards,
Kiran

Hi,
When you are change pointer the system itself will take care of sending the changed master data to your partner system and the user will not have any intervention. If you really wanted to have that then you need to use the change pointers to read the master data which is modified in a custom program and then display that on the screen. Once the user selects that master data records then trigger an IDOC for creating the idoc for that master data and also flag that master data record as processed in the SAP BDCPS standard table, so that the same record will not be picked. If you wanted to know how the change pointers piece of code is written go through the program RBDMIDOC and you can understand how the change pointers logic is written.
Thanks,
Mahesh.

Out bound idocs not triggered

When ever the employee is terminated the comm idocs should be sent to basis ,CRM and SRM systems
But in our case when ever the employees are terminated
equal number of comm idocs are not being triggered for all the systems
For instance
If 10 users are teminated today
10 users,10 communication idocs to basis ,7 to CRm and 7 to SRm systems
For a few users communication idocs are not triggered to CRm and SRM
Please help
Thanks in advance

Hi,
Check in transaction SU01D if the users for which IDocs were not generated are maintained for the respective SRM and CRM systems.
~ Bineah.

WF not triggering in Quality System

Hi,
We moved the Workflow to Quality System, but the event is not triggering.The event linkage is active and workflow customizing has been done.The WF-Batch user is having SUPER user group.Kindly help on this issue.
Thanks,
Mohan

One reason were workflow is not triggered, WF and Event link not enabled.
Hope you are using BOR QMSM and triggering task for notification created in QM02,
1)     try to simulate with SWUE and check whether WF is triggered or not for a dummy task created in QMSM
2)     Check did you made WF Generic otherwise it will not trigger the WF
If you designate your workflow task as a "general task", this means that all users are authorized to start this task.
To restrict the number of authorized persons, you can assign the task to an object from the organizational plan (organizational unit, job, user,...). This is a general procedure and can be used with all types of tasks. If you assign the task directly to a user, only this person is authorized to start the task.
3)     check for user authorization
4)     Check for WF consistence swu5/swu4

BI Idoc Type IS NOT THE SAME AS SOURCE SYSTEM IDOC TYPE

Hi all,
how can we solve the IDoc miss match in source system (ECC6).
Error :
BI Idoc Type ZSTC029 IS NOT THE SAME AS SOURCE SYSTEM IDOC TYPE ZSTC031
please provide me solutions..
Thanks in advance,
Venkatesh

Hi Venkatesh,
Check here.........
BW idoc type not same as source system idoc type
Thanks,
Vijay.

Catcherror event "catch all system exceptions" is not catching subLanguageExecutionFault

catcherror event "catch all system exceptions" is not catching subLanguageExecutionFault in BPM process

hi rani,
thanks for the response
i supply all the connection details(gatewayhost, gatewayservice, programid, clinet, systemnumber, applicationhost, userid, password etc.) to the program which extends "JCoIDoc.Server".
the program is taking care of all the connection establishment details.but still m facing the same problem.
i have also confirmed that the user is a communication user, not a dialogue user.
thanks
pavan

TFS2013 webclient not triggering WHENCHANGED rule on System.RelatedLinkCount

Hello Team,
We had upgraded our TFS from 2010 to 2013 update 4 version recent.
we are facing a issue with "webclient not triggering WHENCHANGED rule on System.RelatedLinkCount", but it works fine with Visual Studio 2013 Update 4.
Later on search on MSDN I found this was know issue in TFS 2012 and marked as closed with latest TFS version.
https://connect.microsoft.com/VisualStudio/feedback/details/788395/tfs2012-webclient-not-triggering-whenchanged-rule-on-system-relatedlinkcount-while-visual-studio-does
Could anyone please confirm whether this issue still carried over to TFS 2013 update 4 version?
Raghavendra Vagga

Hi Vagga,
Thanks for your post.
I tested this scenario in my TFS 2013 Update 4 Server, and received the same result(not triggered WHENCHANGED rule on System.RelatedLinkCount) in Web Access.
For this scenario, please submit it to Microsoft Connect Feedback portal at:
https://connect.microsoft.com/VisualStudio. Microsoft engineers will evaluate them seriously.
We are trying to better understand customer views on social support experience, so your participation in this interview project would be greatly appreciated if you have time. Thanks for helping make community forums a great place.
Click
HERE to participate the survey.

'Acknowledgement Not Possible' Error message

Iam doing IDOC-XI-File scenario .
Iam able to write file successfully. But It lookslike creating acknowledgement. Since there is no routing possible, Iam getting this error in SXMB_Moni. A looked at File adapter as well. I have no clue. Lookslike I might have setup something incorrectly.. Would some one help me?
Thanks

Hi Ram,
Receiver adapters that run on the Adapter Engine support system acknowledgments if they are requested by the sender. Acknowledgements are triggered when a message is successfully processed by the adapter or if an error occurs while it is being processed. Receiver adapters do not support application acknowledgments. The RNIF and CIDX adapters are exceptions to this rule, since they also support scenario-dependent application acknowledgments. Sender adapters of the Adapter Engine do not request any acknowledgments.
However IDoc adapter is requesting application acks. Therefore you have to disable acks for this scenario using report IDX_NOALE.
Also go through these documents for any further help:
http://sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/com.sap.km.cm.docs/library/xi/xi-how-to-guides/how%20to%20handle%20acknowledgments%20for%20idoc.pdf
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/6a/e6194119d8f323e10000000a155106/content.htm
Also refer the guide: "How To Handle Acknowledgments for IDoc"
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/f6d2d790-0201-0010-9382-b50b499b3fbe
Regards,
Abhy
Message was edited by: Abhy Thomas

IDOC Negative acknowledge not triggering system Exception

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for