Image tables index and triggers error generation

Hi All
While running the ETL workflow (Informatica Version 8.1) for a table (W_ORDER_D) through DAC, an error was thrown up stating “Image tables were not available”.
We thought that the image tables had been dropped somehow and in order to recreate the same we right clicked the order table and selected change capture scripts > Generate image and trigger scripts.
We tried running the script generated above in SQLplus but the same errored out when triggers and indexes were trying to get created (Trigger and Index creation were part of the script)
We then took out the SQL blocks for the creation of triggers/and indexes from the script and ran the same. This time the script ran to completion.
We then ran the ETL workflow and this also ran to completion without giving any errors.
Our question is, like we said above we removed portions of the “Generate image and trigger script” for the creation of triggers and indexes and then ran it so that those triggers and indexes do not exist in the database.
Would this in anyway cause any problems in future like affecting functionality or performance?
The original script has been uploaded.

Update on this, The capture to convert also appears not to be working for the TSQL code. The converted "Oracle" model, appears to still be TSQL. (which makes sense w/the generate error I'm getting). If I manually drop the code into the Scratch Editor and "translate" it, it appears to convert to Oracle SQL. But it is not doing so in the Capture to Convert model. The code appears unchanged there.

Similar Messages

Aria2 Routine Table DHT and checksum errors

Hi,
I'm actually reinstalling my Arch system, but there comes a problem :
When I was having my previous installation, everything was working fine and the ~/.aria2/dht.dat appeared alone without giving any problem or anything.
There, I reinstall it, import my ~/.aria2 from the previous installation to my actual home directory and remove the DHT.dat.
Then I start a torrent, just to see if all is going well and everything.
I get this error message :
[...]ERROR - [DHTSetup.cc:112] Exception caught while loading DHT routing table from ~/.aria2/dht.dat
Exception: [DHTSetup.cc:104] errorCode=1 Could not open file
So, I remember when I first installed it I didn't have to create the DHT or anything, so I look inside my ~/aria2 folder and see that the dht.dat just got created.
I start another torrent and I get this error :
ERROR - Checksum error detected. file=[...]
I start 2 more torrents, same error happen.
I just wanted to ask : Is this a normal behavior that all the torrents I tried had a Checksum error and that I had a DHTSetup.cc error ?
Thanks,
Totony.
EDIT : Just looked at some informations about the DHT. It doesn't seems like the two problems are linked, but I still wonder, is this a normal error (the DHTSetup.cc). And why do all my torrents have a checksum error ? (Dependency not installed ?)
EDIT 2 : Problem got fixed, checksum errors where because of the -V option added to aria2 and DHT error is a normal error.
Last edited by Totony (2011-07-31 17:28:55)

Just adding a column and making it a text field isn't enough. You need to set the source of the column to be equal to the other columns added by the wizard. After setting it up properly, it should be fine.
Denes Kubicek
http://deneskubicek.blogspot.com/
http://www.opal-consulting.de/training
http://apex.oracle.com/pls/otn/f?p=31517:1
http://www.amazon.de/Oracle-APEX-XE-Praxis/dp/3826655494
-------------------------------------------------------------------

AS EXPORT TABLES, PROCEDURES, AND TRIGGERS MORE?

Hi,
I've finished my application on Oracle XE, and make the export of Workspace, the Scheme, then
and export tables, procedures, triggers, etc, from Oracle XE to install on another computer?
I appreciate your partnership and Attention ...
Reynel Salazar Martinez ...

por la parte de utilidades se genera la opcion
ddl...
y listo

How to obtain the table index in word use LabVIEW Report Generation Toolkit for Microsoft Office

I created a word templete and it had several tables. When I use the "Word Edit Cell" function in LabVIEW Report Generation Toolkit for Microsoft Office, the function need "table index", and I didn't find any function to get or set the table index in word document. How can I achieve my attention to write value to specified table cell using the "Word Edit Cell" function?
Thanks for reply!
YangAfreet

Hi yangafreet
You do not need to get the table index for the word edit cell.vi from anywhere. LabVIEW will automatically index all the tables in the document. See the attatched vi for an example.
Rich
Attachments:
Table Edit.vi ‏23 KB

What is auxilary mappings in Informatica and IMAGE tables in DAC

Hi Guys,
Please let if you have any info regarding auxillary mappings and Image tables
Thanks and Regards,
sp

Auxillary mappings and Impae tables are both used in implementing Change Capture and primarily this concept is Used in Siebel.
For more information look at this link -
http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/E12104_01/books/DAC/DACCommonTasks18.html
Cheers,
Sid

Full table scan and how to avoid it

Hello,
I have two tables, one with 425,000 records, and the other with 5,200,000 records in it. The smaller table has an index on its unique primary key, and the bigger table has an index on the foreign key of the smaller table.
When joining these two tables, I keep getting full table scans on both of these tables, and I would like to understand the philosophy behind it as well as ways to avoid this.
Thanks

Are you manipulating the join columns in any fashion? Such as applying a function to them like in
to_char(column_a) = to_char(column_b)Because any manipulation like that will obviate your index (assuming you don't have function based indexes).
Really though, without your tables, indexes and query, we're left with voodoo, which is cool, but not really that effective.
*note to any and all practicing witch doctors, i really do think voodoo is cool and effective, please don't persecute me for my speakings.
Message was edited by:
Tubby

How to import tables, indexes, tablespace, etc from a DMP.

Hello,
I like to know how to import tables, indexes, tablespace, etc from an DMP export of a Oracle 10.2.0.1 to be apply on a Oracle 11.2.0. When I import the DMP file all the data is going to one single Tablespace, for example, Users tablespace.
On the original database we have various tablespace's each separated with different content (tables, indexes) and I like to know if it posible to import the same schema,tables, indexes, tablespace all made with one single DMP Export. I can't use DBUA because the software of the database on the 10.2 is missing, I have only a DMP file (24GB) of DMP!.
Thanks for the reply,
Sorry for my english :).
Regards.

thanks for that but is not what Im looking for.
Look, on my ORCL directory of the oracle 10.2 I have for example this:
CONTROL01.CTL
EXAMPLE01.DBF
REDO01-1.LOG
REDO01.LOG
REDO02-2.LOG
REDO02.LOG
REDO03-3.LOG
REDO03.LOG
RMAN.DBF
SYSAUX01.DBF
SYSTEM01.DBF
TEMP01.DBF
UNDOTBS01.DBF
USERS01.DBF
TABLESPACE1.ORA
TABLESPACE2.ORA
TABLESPACE3.ORA
TABLESPACE4.ORA
TABLESPACE5.ORA
I make a full export to a DMP. Then in my 11.2 version first I created the user then when import the DMP file none of the tablespace (TABLESPACE1, TABLESPACE2, ETC...) is created, all is going to the USERS tablespace, SO, im looking a way to tell imp command that generates the exactly tablespace structure that i was have on the 10.2.
Hope this can explain more my problem.
Thanks again!.

CDS-18010 Error:A Index and a index with the same name

Hi
I am facing strange error is some one expert there to help me to get rid of this error.
CDS-18010 Error:A Index and a index with the same name 'LA_SP_FK_1' have been asked to be created.
I am generating tables from Data model diagram & getting this error.
Thanks,
Vijay

Your Right!!
Designer does not like 2 of the same name.
there are several bugs on the same name issue and CDS-18010
Bug.3973155/3443005 (92) CDS-18010 IN CAPTURING A TYPE WITH CONSTRUCTOR FUNTIONS IN ITS BODY:
Bug.2586582 (93) CDS-18010 A DOMAIN AND A DOMAIN WITH THE SAME NAME 'D1' BEEN ASKED TO CREATE:
Bug.2561625 (15) CDS-18010 GENERATION OF TWO SYNONYMS WITH SAME NAME BUT DIFFERENT SCOPE:
Bug.2072505 (93) CDS-18010 CAPTURING 2 TRIGGERS WITH SAME NAME ON ONE TABLE SHOULD BE A WARNING:
Bug.1689800 (90) CDS-18010 PLSQL WITH THE SAME PROCEDURE NAME ALREADY EXISTS:
Bug.1073311/1029997 (96) CDS-18010 ERROR ATTEMPTING TO CREATE 2 PROCEDURES WITH SAME NAME:
Just to name a few.
I would suggest you change the name.
Michael

Table files and Index files 2GB on Windows 2003 Server SP2 32-bit

I'm new to Oracle and I've ran into the problem where my Table files and Index files are > 2GB. I have an Oracle instance running version 10.2.0.3.0. I have a number of tables file and index files that have a current files size of 1.99GB. My Oracle crashes about three times a week because of a "Write Fault/Failure. I've detemined that the RDBM is trying to write a index or table files > 2GB. When this occurs it crashes.
I've been reading the Oracle knowledge base that it suggest that there is a fix or release of Oracle 10g to resolve this problem. However, I've been unable to locate any fix or release to address my issue. Does such a fix or release exist? How do I address this issue? I'm from the world of MS SQL and IBM DB2 and we don't have this issue. I am running and NTFS files system. Could this be issue be related to an Windows Fix?
Surely Oracle can handel databases > 2GB.
Thanks in advance for any help.

After reading your response it appears that my real problem has to do with checking pointing. I've included below a copy of the error message:
Oracle process number: 8
Windows thread id: 3768, image: ORACLE.EXE (CKPT)
*** 2008-07-27 16:50:13.569
*** SERVICE NAME:(SYS$BACKGROUND) 2008-07-27 16:50:13.569
*** SESSION ID:(219.1) 2008-07-27 16:50:13.569
ORA-00206: Message 206 not found; No message file for product=RDBMS, facility=ORA; arguments: [3] [1]
ORA-00202: Message 202 not found; No message file for product=RDBMS, facility=ORA; arguments: [D:\ELLIPSE_DATABASE\CONTROL\CTRL1_ELLPROD1.CTL]
ORA-27072: Message 27072 not found; No message file for product=RDBMS, facility=ORA
OSD-04008: WriteFile() failure, unable to write to file
O/S-Error: (OS 33) The process cannot access the file because another process has locked a portion of the file.
error 221 detected in background process
ORA-00221: Message 221 not found; No message file for product=RDBMS, facility=ORA
ORA-00206: Message 206 not found; No message file for product=RDBMS, facility=ORA; arguments: [3] [1]
ORA-00202: Message 202 not found; No message file for product=RDBMS, facility=ORA; arguments: [D:\ELLIPSE_DATABASE\CONTROL\CTRL1_ELLPROD1.CTL]
ORA-27072: Message 27072 not found; No message file for product=RDBMS, facility=ORA
OSD-04008: WriteFile() failure, unable to write to file
O/S-Error: (OS 33) The process cannot access the file because another process has locked a portion of the file.
Can you tell me why I'm having issues with checking point and the control file?
Can I rebuild the control file if it s corrupt?
The problem has been going on since April 2008. I'm takening over the system.
Thanks

Error while importing a table index.

Hi,
We are facing a problem while importing an index to the production region. Below are the details.
1. A secondary index was created on standard SAP table ILOA in DEV region.
2. The Index was successfully moved to the Quality system, without any glitches.
3. Due to some issue (releated to testing, for which we had to revert back the changes), we had to delete the index on ILOA in the DEV region. The transports were moved to the PPD region and hence, the index on ILOA was deleted in PPD also.
4. Once the issue related to testing was resolved, we again created an index on the table ILOA and moved it to PPD.
All these 4 mentioned steps happened successfully and in PPD there was no error while importing the transports.
But, while moving the above transports to the Production region, there was an error :
"Index ILOA~Y could not be activated
(E - No index ILOA~Y found with status M)"
Please note that Y is the name of the index that was created on the table ILOA.
The error code that we have got is "8".
Can anyone please shed any light on what the issue is?? WE cannot re-import the transports in to Production without analysing this issue,because our client doesnt permit that.
Thanks and eagerly awaiting a kind reply.
Regards,
Raghavendra.

You've three transports - one to create the index, one to delete, and one to recreate. It could be that the the third one tried to run before the database had finished with the second?
Have you looked on SE14 for the actual status on production of the index?
matt

ORA-01502 error in case of unusable unique index and bulk dml

Hi, all.
The db is 11.2.0.3 on a linux machine.
I made a unique index unusable, and issued a dml on the table.
Howerver, oracle gave me ORA-01502 error.
In order to avoid ORA-01502 error, do I have to drop the unique index ,and do bulk dml, and recreate the index?
Or Is there any other solution without re-creating the unique index?
create table hoho.abcde as
select level col1 from dual connect by level <=1000
10:09:55 HOHO@PD1MGD>create unique index hoho.abcde_dx1 on hoho.abcde (col1);
Index created.
10:10:23 HOHO@PD1MGD>alter index hoho.abcde_dx1 unusable;
Index altered.
Elapsed: 00:00:00.03
10:11:27 HOHO@PD1MGD>delete from hoho.abcde where rownum < 11;
delete from hoho.abcde where rownum < 11
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-01502: index 'HOHO.ABCDE_DX1' or partition of such index is in unusable stateThanks in advance.
Best Regards.

Hi. all.
The following is from "http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E14072_01/server.112/e10595/indexes002.htm#CIHJIDJG".
Is there anyone who can show me a tip to avoid the following without dropping and re-creating an unique index?
•DML statements terminate with an error if there are any unusable indexes that are used to enforce the UNIQUE constraint.
Unusable indexes
An unusable index is ignored by the optimizer and is not maintained by DML. One reason to make an index unusable is if you want to improve the performance of bulk loads. (Bulk loads go more quickly if the database does not need to maintain indexes when inserting rows.) Instead of dropping the index and later recreating it, which requires you to recall the exact parameters of the CREATE INDEX statement, you can make the index unusable, and then just rebuild it. You can create an index in the unusable state, or you can mark an existing index or index partition unusable. The database may mark an index unusable under certain circumstances, such as when there is a failure while building the index. When one partition of a partitioned index is marked unusable, the other partitions of the index remain valid.
An unusable index or index partition must be rebuilt, or dropped and re-created, before it can be used. Truncating a table makes an unusable index valid.
Beginning with Oracle Database 11g Release 2, when you make an existing index unusable, its index segment is dropped.
The functionality of unusable indexes depends on the setting of the SKIP_UNUSABLE_INDEXES initialization parameter.
When SKIP_UNUSABLE_INDEXES is TRUE (the default), then:
•DML statements against the table proceed, but unusable indexes are not maintained.
•DML statements terminate with an error if there are any unusable indexes that are used to enforce the UNIQUE constraint.
•For non-partitioned indexes, the optimizer does not consider any unusable indexes when creating an access plan for SELECT statements. The only exception is when an index is explicitly specified with the INDEX() hint.
•For a partitioned index where one or more of the partitions are unusable, the optimizer does not consider the index if it cannot determine at query compilation time if any of the index partitions can be pruned. This is true for both partitioned and non-partitioned tables. The only exception is when an index is explicitly specified with the INDEX() hint.
When SKIP_UNUSABLE_INDEXES is FALSE, then:
•If any unusable indexes or index partitions are present, any DML statements that would cause those indexes or index partitions to be updated are terminated with an error.
•For SELECT statements, if an unusable index or unusable index partition is present but the optimizer does not choose to use it for the access plan, the statement proceeds. However, if the optimizer does choose to use the unusable index or unusable index partition, the statement terminates with an error.Thanks in advance.
Best Regards.

Error: No first field of table index in where condition

I've got following errors while doing code inspector or extended syntax check:
(Large table VEKP: No first field of table index in where condition).
My code is like below as per as code-logic.
What's the necessary changes to do to remove the above code?
SELECT VENUM
             BRGEW
             BTGEW
             BTVOL
             VOLEH
             VHILM
             LMENG
             BREIT
             HOEHE
             MEABM
             VPOBJKEY
             FROM VEKP
             INTO TABLE i_vekp
             WHERE vpobjkey = w_mkpf-xblnr.
IF sy-subrc = 0.
SORT i_vekp BY venum.
ENDIF.
How can I remove the error? How to use index in where clause I'm not getting and on which key? or, should I use the statement "EC C1_NOFIRST to remove the error?
Kindly guide.

> should I use the statement "EC C1_NOFIRST to remove the error?
you can not really ask this question in this forum. This check gives you hints to the most serious problems in database accesses, if you want to override it, then you should better forget about performance.
If you are not familiar how databases use indexes, then check resources in the net or in books, in
short they use indexes and the indexes are absolutly necessary with large tables, if you want to get
good performance.
But indexes can only be used in the order of their field, until a field is not used in the WHERE-condition, (gap). If the gap is already the first field, then the index can not be used at all.
In your case there is not first field of any index specified in the WHERE condition, so the SELECT might be slow. Either you can add a condition on a first index field or you have to live with a poor performance.
Siegfried

Tables TCURM and T001K inconsistent Error While Creating Materials by BAPI

Hi I am Using the BAPI
BAPI_MATERIAL_SAVEDATA to create Material Masters I am creating all views for a Material.
When I repeatedly run the BAPI for Multiple runs to create the Materials for Multiple plants and multple sales Views
I get an Error Message when it is tryng to create accounting and costing View
The error is Tables
TCURM and T001K inconsistent; notify your systems administrator
I dont get this message if I create one Material.
I get this error message only when I repeat the loop and try to create Materials for different valvation areas..
Please some one give ur views ..
I promise All replies will be rewarded..
Thanks
Martin

Rob,
This is the peculiar behavious of SAP.
As i am trying to create the materials by using the BAPI with in Visual Basic.
The error can be simulated by using online data entry
i did a research on it and i found that the error can be overcome if we create the accouting view first and later oher views and this occurs if we try to create accouting views for other valuation areas are plants when we set the MRP_VIEW = "X" and ACCOUNT_VIEW = "X" and COST_VIEW = "X"
i dont know the exact reason for all this...
Thanks
Martin

Error message when uploading book for printing. All images are jpg and rgb. Could they be too large to upload? What size is required and how do I reduce size in Aperture?

I receive an error message when I upload my book for printing. Not sure what the problem is. All my images are jpg and rgb. Could they be too large as it takes about 15minutes to upload to Apple. How do I reduce the size of the image in Aperture?

Hi Leonie,
Thanks for your reply.
Error message below. The preview is fine . I can discount the first 2messages as its a new computer so plenty of disk space and upload doesn't seem to be interrupted. I have uploaded to iphoto before. have tried to upload 3times with the same error message. I had to photo my slides with a Kaiser Baas photo maker , which apparently doesn't scan but takes photos in megapixels of the slides. I am wondering now if the format is incompatible though they are jpg files or the colour type wrong. The image files are around 1-3 mb each and 72 ppi. I think I will now scan them properly with a scanner to 300dpi anyway to improve quality.
Apple talks about image files not being too big for uploading but gives no sizing of what too big is?
Error message
1. Upload Error. Loss of connection or file corruption during order upload may cause an incomplete order. Resubmitting your order usually resolves this issue.
2. Low Disk Space. If your computer is running on low disk space, your files may be assembled incorrectly. Create more space by deleting unused files.
3. Unreadable PDF file or image files. Files are sometimes assembled incorrectly due to CMYK or Grayscale color space. Use the RGB color space for best results.

What happens to Existing index after table partition and created with local index

Hi guys,
desc part id number, name varchar2(100), salary number
In an existing table PART i am adding 1 more column DATASEQ NUMBER. i am asked to partition the table part based on dataseq.now the table is created with this logic
create table part( id number, name varchar2(100), salary number, DATASEQ number) partition by list(dataseq) (partition PART_INITIAL values (1));
Suggestionn required. since the table is partitioned based on DATASEQ i am asked to add local index on dataseq. i have added local index to dataseq create index idx on part(dataseq) LOCAL; Now my question is already there is existing index is for the column ID and salary.
1) IDX for dataseq is created locally so that it will have partition on each partition on the main table. Please tell me what happens to the existing index on the column ID and salary.. will it again created in local?
Please suggest
S

Hi,
first of all, in reality "partition a table" means create a new table a migrate existing data there (although theoretically you can use dbms_redefinition to partition an existing table -- however, it's just doing the same thing behind the scenes). This means that you also get to decide what to do with the indexes -- which indexes will be local, which will be global (you can also re-evaluate some of existing indexes and decide that they're not really needed).
Second of all, the choice of partitioning key looks odd. Partitioning is a data manageability technique more than anything else, so in order to benefit from it you need to find a good partitioning key. A recently added column named "data_seq" doesn't look like a good candidate. Can you provide more details about this column and why it was chosen as a partitioning key?
I suspect that whoever suggested this partitioning scheme is making a huge mistake. A non-partitioned table is much better in all aspects (including manageability and performance) than wrongly partitioned one.
Best regards,
Nikolay

Image tables index and triggers error generation

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for