IMessage and new Top level domains

My new email address has a new top-level domain (.kiwi instead of .nz) - I am trying to get iMessage to allow the use of that address, but the verification email never arrives. Anyone know a way to convince Apple that my new email address is legitimate and can be used for iMessage and FaceTime?

Hello The-Organist,
After reviewing your post, I have located an article that can help in this situation. It contains a number of troubleshooting steps and helpful advice concerning Apple ID issues:
Frequently asked questions about Apple ID
http://support.apple.com/kb/ht5622
How do I verify my Apple ID by email?
Simply follow the link in the verification email that says "Verify Now." Sign in with your current Apple ID and password, then click Verify Address. You can also verify by signing in at My Apple ID. You'll receive an email prompting you to verify.
Thank you for contributing to Apple Support Communities.
Cheers,
BobbyD

Similar Messages

Email address with new top level domain (TLD)

Hi all,
Apple does not recognise the new top level domains. My company has a new domain e.g. aaa.systems and os x says that the email [email protected] is not valid!
Please help.

This will work partly. But the mail address will still be [email protected] and gives an issue with the outgoing mail server.

DNS Server does not resolve new generic Top Level Domain names- CNR configuration issue?

Hi all,
I am not sure if this is the correct community to post this question, but I will give it a try. I noticed that the users of my network cannot resolve web sites using new top level domain names, like ".education", ".international", etc. I have an internal DNS server made by Infoblox and a Cisco CNR v6.3.3.1 as an external DNS server. Infoblox uses CNR as its forwarder and CNR uses the root DNS servers for queries.
I would think that CNR was the problem because it is an obsolete product but after speaking with a fellow engineer at another organization where they still use an older version of CNR than mine, they have no problems at all. So now I am thinking it is a setting either on Infoblox, or on CNR I need to change. I can see Infoblox is forwarding the requests to CNR but that's about it. I am not sure if CNR is discarding the request. When I do an nslookup from a PC in my network it does not matter if I set my DNS server to be the Infoblox or the CNR. Neither resolves the URL.
Then again, no matter what I lookup using the CNR as my DNS, I only get a response with the root DNS names and IPs!
Any help is appreciated!

Hi Constantinos,
Have you taken a look at the infoblox community site? We've just reposted your question there and alerted some internal SMEs that should provide a solution soon.
https://community.infoblox.com/forum/ddi/dns-server-does-not-resolve-new-generic-top-level-domain-names-cnr-configuration-issue
Best,
Eric

How to stop location bar autocomplete from using top-level domains?

I love the location bar autocomplete - or at least, I used to. I had it trained to the point where typing one letter was enough to bring up the pages I used most often. But now with Firefox 12, it ignores all that and favors top-level domains.
For instance: I haven't been to the front page of YouTube in years; there's no reason to go there. When I would type "www.y" into the location bar, it would pop up to the one video I visited most often - and that's exactly what I WANTED it to do. Now it defaults to "YouTube.com" and I have to scroll down to find the actual page I want. Same deal with Wikipedia: I don't want to go to the front page, I want to go to the page I use most often for research.
So basically, what do I need to change to get the location bar autocomplete to stop giving me top-level domains I don't want, and go back to giving me the subpages I spent years training it to favor? Scrolling down to the right entry is a waste of time when typing one letter and hitting enter should be enough to do it...

And I meant the actual location bar, not the dropdown menu below it. The dropdown is fine: it's the autocomplete '''in''' the location bar that needs to be fixed...

Naming your top level domain

I am setting up a new directory server for our organization, we'll call it direct.org.
I would like to know how you determine which way to name your top level domain.
o=direct
o=direct.org
dc=direct,dc=org
Most of the organizations around us use the "o=xxxx.org" or "o=xxxx.edu" so I set up our test server as o=direct.org. Before I put this thing into production I wanted to find out what factors are used to determine how you define the top level domain.
We are, in a sense, an ISP. However, our only clients are educational institutions.
I took Sun's Directory Server class last year and I asked this question in class. It seems that nobody could come up with a clear answer to this question.

For LDAP V2 - use o=direct.org
for LDAP V3 - use dc=direct,dc=org

How to connect top level domain database to subdomains

Created subdomains for the top level domains. Need to learn
how can we connect centralized database in the top level domain
with the subdomains code in coldfusion.

If you're using EOP and your goal is to block stuff coming from a certain geographic area then you need to go to your exchange admin center select Protection>content filter>Default Policy>International Spam>Filter email messages sent from the
following countries or regions

How to block top-level domain names in rules for EOP?

Using EOP for email filtering to/from our on-premise Exchange server. How do I block entire top-level domains in the rules section under mail flow? For example, w need everything ending with .link blocked. Right now I
have only been able to block email addresses and full domain names. I know I can setup a transport rule in our exchange, but I'd prefer EOP handle this before like it should. Thanks in advance.

If you're using EOP and your goal is to block stuff coming from a certain geographic area then you need to go to your exchange admin center select Protection>content filter>Default Policy>International Spam>Filter email messages sent from the
following countries or regions

Realms with different top-level domain

I'm testing OCS 10.1.2 and I am interested in setting up multiple realms.
Must all realms be in the same top-level domain? I see in the examples (like in Note Note:317434.1) names like this:
- Default realm created at install:
dc=us,dc=oracle,dc=com
- Additional realms created by the administrator post-install:
dc=uk,dc=oracle,dc=com
dc=ca,dc=oracle,dc=com
A more typical example for what we need would be:
dc=company,dc=co,dc=uk
dc=company,dc=no
dc=company,dc=de
Is this possible?

What are the consequence of that? Any practical problems?
I see in Note 308682.1 that the top level of a top level domain is NULL. So maybe instead of world you can use an empty top level domain.
However, this document refers to mail and not OID.

Block Top Level Domain (.eu)

I'm trying to configure a transport rule in Exchange 2013 to block all emails from the TLD .eu We get nothing but a TON of spam that is not caught by the Exchange 2013 spam filter, and it's always from a different domain. I have seen guides for
2007 and 2010, but nothing for 2013.
Do I just use the rule "The sender domain is" and use the value ".eu"? I just want to verify this is the correct way to block a TLD.

Hi Jsilveri,
You can use Sender Filtering feature:
Set-SenderFilterConfig –BlockedDomains
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb124087(v=exchg.150).aspx
Thanks,
Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help and unmark them if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Subscriber Support, contact
[email protected]
Simon Wu
TechNet Community Support
That is the same answer as before. The domain changes with each spam message. I need to block anything coming from a .EU top level domain. So domain1.eu , domain2.eu should all be blocked with 1 rule.

Service interruption when adding cluster top level domain in CUCM 9.1.2?

I need to add a top level domain in CUCM 9.1.2. Will this result in any downtime or endpoint resets?

Hi,
No, it is not service impacting. It does not require any reset of devices or services.
HTH
Manish

A new top level site was created successfully but won't launch. What can be the cause for this?

A site collection was created with the URL intranet.contoso and it was added to the DNS as intranet.contoso. The top-level site was created successfully after that with the URL being
http://intranet.contoso/main but it is not launching and the following is the error message -
This page can't be displayed.
This will be a production environment so disabling the security loopback will not be an option. Any suggestions?
Many Thanks,

I can connect only to the SharePoint Central Administrator from the client computer but not the top level site.
The error i'm getting is This page can't be displayed.
Make sure the web address http://contonsoportalis correct
Look for the page with your search engine
Refresh in a few minutes
Fix connection problems - When clicked the following shows up "Make sure the computer or device is turned on and connected to the network" Windows can't find contosoportal. If the computer or device you are trying to reach is nearby,
make sure it is turned on and connected to the network. Otherwise contact your network administrator for assistance.
The DSN already had a host created for an intranet that is running SharePoint 2010 called intranet so I created a new host (A and AAA) named it Portal insert the ip address of the new sharepoint 2013 server but it still didn't work.
This is the configuration shown in the DNS
Host A Tab -
Host (uses parent domain if left blank)
Portal.contoso.local
IP address: 192. X.X.X for the SharePoint Server
( Should I create a CNAME instead of a new host for the portal? )
I added the host names in the register but it still does not work....
It's a virtual environment running on top of hyper V - One server for SharePoint another for SQL and both joined to the DC.

Setting and calling top level varialbes

Is there away to call and set a top level variable from a
child component that way i can access the variable no matter where
i am from inside the application. For example i have a login
component that gets the userid. I would then like to set that
userid to a scope that can be accessed from any other component as
i use the userid to validate other cfc calls and so on.

Application.application should get you there.
i.e. Application.application.myVariable

Clean and Pristine AD Migration with same top level domain, possible?

We had planned on doing a C&P migration of a domain with the initial assumption that the TLD was .local.
Turns out it is .com, is it still possible to do C&P?
TLD is company.com, no sub domain.
We want xxxxxxx.company.com as the AD sub domain. From everything I read C&P requires a different TLD or can it work so long as we use a sub domain? Eventually the old server will go away.
Going from 2003 64 Bit to 2012 R2 as far as schema.

Yes you can.
But
If you have xyz.com now and you want sub.xyz.com and you create this as a child domain then the old xyz.com will always be around. You can create sub.xyz.com as a different forest and migrate off of xyz.com if you want.
If you're going from 2003 to 2012 you'll need to wait for the newest version of ADMT to be released. Right now 3.2 does not support 2012. You can create the new domain as 2008 R2 and then raise it to 2012 after your migration if you need to start
soonest.
If it answered your question, remember to “Mark as Answer”.
If you found this post helpful, please “Vote as Helpful”.
Postings are provided “AS IS” with no warranties, and confers no rights.
Active Directory: Ultimate Reading Collection

Top Level Domain for DDNS not working (still) for RV320

Please see the following thread for further details: https://supportforums.cisco.com/discussion/12104721/rv320-ddns-update-top-domain
When will an update be made available?
Thanks.

If you enter "www.shenzhenguide.com IN CNAME ns1" there has to be a dot after the .com like : "www.shenzhenguide.com. IN CNAME ns1" but you usually drop it to "www IN CNAME ns1" instead.
(I don't think you can call the host in a domain for a subdomain).
Try it like this:
$TTL 3600
shenzhenguide.com. IN SOA ns1.shenzhenguide.com. info.shenzhenparty.com. (
2006061012 ; serial
3h ; refresh
1h ; retry
1w ; expiry
1h ) ; minimum
shenzhenguide.com. IN NS ns1.shenzhenguide.com.
shenzhenguide.com. IN NS ns2.shenzhenguide.com.
shenzhenguide.com. IN A 61.145.163.184
ns1 IN A 61.145.163.184
www IN CNAME ns1
mail IN CNAME ns1
shenzhenguide.com. IN MX 1 ns1 (maybe use: shenzhenguide.com. IN MX 1 mail.shenzhenguide.com. instead)
ns2 IN A 210.17.235.228
What's this? :
*.shenzhenguide.com IN CNAME ns1
And the domain is now handled by zoneedit (with all A records for mail and www.):
host -v www.shenzhenguide.com
Trying "www.shenzhenguide.com"
;; QUESTION SECTION:
;www.shenzhenguide.com. IN A
;; ANSWER SECTION:
www.shenzhenguide.com. 7200 IN A 61.145.163.184
;; AUTHORITY SECTION:
shenzhenguide.com. 6688 IN NS ns17.zoneedit.com.
shenzhenguide.com. 6688 IN NS ns3.zoneedit.com.
host -v -t mx shenzhenguide.com
Trying "shenzhenguide.com"
;; ANSWER SECTION:
shenzhenguide.com. 7200 IN MX 0 mail.shenzhenguide.com.
And there's no reverse:
host -v 61.145.163.184
Trying "184.163.145.61.in-addr.arpa"
Host 184.163.145.61.in-addr.arpa not found: 3(NXDOMAIN)

Can I make FF 24 ESR check top level domains in permissions.sqlite like it used to (FF ≤17 ESR)?

permissions.sqlite stores various permissions for web sites. Up until some pre FF 20 version, permissions for domain 'doubleclick.net' applied also for 'www.doubleclick.net' (and obviously other subdomains). This was very handy and useful, because it worked for TLDs too: e.g I had set up default permissions for no scripts were allowed for the com TLD, no documents for the xxx TLD etc.
After some version, this stopped working. Ergo, for my peace of mind, I turned to FF 17 ESR, because this “inheritance” mechanism worked fine.
Unfortunately, FF17ESR is no more. I updated the browser and got the 24ESR version. I don't seem to be able to go back.
I found out about similar issues with permissions.sqlite, verified I don't have any 'scheme:file' host fields etc. The mechanism works, but without any inheritance.
I can assume that this is an optimisation (ie lookup only the domain name, not recursively its parents), but I really, *really* would like to have this functionality back. Is there some option I can set in about:config to turn it back on? I prefer security over speed.
I'm willing to customize the relevant code and compile and use my own FF24ESR, if only some kind soul would give me a hint as to where in the source code there is the permissions.sqlite checking mechanism. I tried for a couple of hours to locate said mechanism to no avail.
Thanks in advance

Hello,
This is a good suggestion and to be honest, I didn't know that the permissions manager doesn't respect TLDs and that is site specific. I did locate a couple of bugs around this
# Firefox 18.0 added a feature for per site cookie blocking, [https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=770691 Bug# 770691] and [https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/18.0/releasenotes/buglist.html FF 18.0 Release notes] - guess is that this might be related to what you are seeing, though this is what it is - a guess
#There is another bug, marked as 'will not fix' to provide an option in the UI to disable javascript [https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=873709 Bugzilla #873709]
#Also, managed to track a meta-bug for implementing site-specific permissions and it is likely that the issue you are seeing is a side-effect of one of these [https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=573176 Bugzilla# 573176- Implement Site-Specific Privacy Preferences ]. I couldn't track which bug it was that logged for the JS preferences blocking
I will continue to search and see if I am able to locate the exact change. Meanwhile, someone who is aware of the changes more closely than I do, can chime in.
Hope that helps.

IMessage and new Top level domains

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for