Importing Folder w/ RAW & JPG, no JPGs load

I download my CF card to a folder I create on my HD. With my present camera setting, I get a RAW capture and a JPG capture.
When I import this folder into Aperture, the JPGs show up in the Import>Local Files, but won't import into a Project folder. Why is this?
I have not had this problem with all folders, but with almost all.
Also, I have one folder with layered PSD files. The PSD files appear as blank thumbnails, both in the Import>Local Files window as well as the Project folder. In the middle of this blank thumbnail is tiny tiny text in four languages that says: "This layered Photshop file was not saved with a composite image". These layered PSD files are identical (as far as I can tell) with other layered PSD files that have been imported into other Projects with no problem. I have tried following the "...Layered PSD..." thread in the Support page, but to no avail. Need help with this.
Thanks
Tower G5 2.7Ghz Dual, 30 & 20in Monitors, 8 GB RAM,  Mac OS X (10.4.8)   Aperture ver 1.5.1

Hi twims,
As BNO said, the JPEG files are recognized by Aperture when they are in the same folder as their associated RAW upon import. However, you only see one version of the image. The actual RAW Master and the associated JPEG Master kind of sit behind this version. As BNO also said, you can use the menu option Images>New Version from Master JPEG to view and adjust the JPEG, just like you can use Images>New Version from Master (which creates a new version from the RAW in this case). The options are also available by right clicking on an image version also, or by using shortcut keys.
I also shoot RAW+JPEG quite often because I have wanted a way to have JPEGs available quickly. This may change now that I have Aperture...time will tell. But I have to say, I prefer Aperture's handling of the RAW+JPEG files in this way. I don't like the way Bridge handles them, by showing both the RAW and the JPEG. This makes it more difficult to see what I have. I might shoot hundreds of shots in a day, so I don't want to see that multiplied by two. PhotoMechanic combines RAW+JPEG as one viewed image and I have always liked that. However, PhotoMechanic makes it a Preference setting, which might be a good future enhancement for Aperture.
Oh, I have also noticed that if you change metadata in another program (such as PhotoMechanic) that the RAW and JPEG may import into Aperture separately. I think that the file timestamp gets changed and this makes Aperture think they are different shots. I have fixed this by using PhotoMechanic's Tools>Adjust Capture Dates and Times menu option. Once I run the files through this tool with the "Update file creation date/time" and the "Update file modification date/time" options checked, the files will import into Aperture joined.
Regarding your Photoshop files, one thing you might try is to check your Photoshop Preference settings under File Handling. Set "Maximize PSD and PSB File Compatibility" to "Always." Also, search this forum and you will find that some people have had problems with Photoshop files saved in Lab Color Mode instead of RGB Color Mode. I think I've also seen people having problems with certain types of saved paths or channels, I don't quite remember the exact issue.
Hope that helps,
- Karen
PowerMac G5 Dual 2GHz   Mac OS X (10.4.8)  

Similar Messages

  • Just upgraded to 60d and lr 3.5.  Import not showing jpg files in folder and showing as raw+jpg

    the jpg and raw used to show side by side in catalog and in import dialoge now they are "stacked" together, I cannot seem the jpg in the import dialog at all, even though they are there in windows explorer.
    they show as raw+jpg after import.  how do I make them show as separate files???
    I'd like to see the side by side with the new camera

    Edit/Preferences/ Import Options / Treat JPG Files next to raw files as  separate photos  has to be checkmarked.
    Frans

  • Import selection RAW / JPG in Lightroom 3

    Hello,
    On some assignments I need to quickly upload some photo's in jpg to a client. But for my archive I need the same pictures in RAW. Therefore in those situations I shoot both RAW and JPG on the same CF-card.
    I am looking for a way to quickly select pictures by extension at import, so that I can import only the jpg's on my laptop when on assignment and later import only the RAW files when at home at my desktop. Is there a way to do this?
    Best regards,
    Johannes Abeling

    I have to agree with Jasonized that using file explorer to import your photos is the best way to move JPEG files seperately. Personally I never use LR's memory card import function. I prefer to consolidate most multi-day shoots (i.e. muliple folders on memory card) to one (1) folder by manually creating that one (1) folder first, and then using drag and drop or copy and paste to move the files off the camera memory card. If you only want to move over the JPEG files to another person's laptop, it's very easy to sort by file type using this process.
    You can use LR's memory card import function if you prefer to load both RAW and JPEG to YOUR system. If you don't want to see the JPEG files (i.e. just archiving on HDD) go to LR Preferences>File Handling>General and unselect 'Treat JPEG files next to raw files as seperate photos.' I understand the convenience of using LR for memory card import function, so perhaps Adobe could add the ability to sort by 'file type' AND ability to also "combine" mutliple folders on the memory card to one (1) destination folder. Does that sound like something that would be useful?

  • How to import RAW+JPG?

    I recently acquired a Canon 30D and am now able to save my images in RAW+JPG format, which gives me the normal RAW (CR2) file and a JPEG file for each capture. This is handy for using the picture styles where the RAW is the normal full capture of colour while the JPEG is processed according to the selected picture style giving, for example, a monochrome image.
    When I try to import these from the card the preview displays thumbnails only of the JPEG images but only the CR2 files appear to be imported. However, looking at the folder on disk reveals that the JPEG files have also been imported but are simply not displayed within Lightroom itself.
    I could of course work with the JPEG files outside of my Lightroom library but would prefer not to do so. How can I get the JPEG files to become part of the library so that I can work with them in Lightroom?

    A search for RAW + JPEG brings up a page load of pertinent entries for me.
    Don
    Don Ricklin, MacBook 1.83Ghz Duo 2 Core running 10.4.9 & Win XP, Pentax *ist D
    http://donricklin.blogspot.com/

  • Raw imports fail if shooting in RAW+JPG

    I've got a canon Xsi and set it to record RAW+JPG for some testing. I installed 10.5.4 which claimed to support RAW for the camera. But I could never get any of the images to import.
    I've now figured out what is going on. I was using the USB cable to plug into the camera which uses the Image Capture framework to copy the images to the computer. There is a bug in the image capture framework that it always uses the size of the JPG file when it copies the file over, even when copying the RAW file. This has the effect of truncating the RAW file, causing the RAW conversion to fail.
    To work around this problem, use a card reader that causes the card to mount as a disk drive. You'll then get the whole RAW file and the image will import properly.
    I've filed a bug.

    Welcome to the Apple Discussions. Also if you just shoot RAW I believe iPhoto will import correctly from the camera. Since iPhoto creates a jpg file for each raw that is imported you will still have both types of files in iPhoto. Since I don't shoot raw I don't know if there's any difference between the jpg created by the camera and the one created by iPhoto when importing RAW only. If you get a chance to test it out and report that would be of interest to others. Thanks for the feedback.
    TIP: For insurance against the iPhoto database corruption that many users have experienced I recommend making a backup copy of the Library6.iPhoto (iPhoto.Library for iPhoto 5 and earlier) database file and keep it current. If problems crop up where iPhoto suddenly can't see any photos or thinks there are no photos in the library, replacing the working Library6.iPhoto file with the backup will often get the library back. By keeping it current I mean backup after each import and/or any serious editing or work on books, slideshows, calendars, cards, etc. That insures that if a problem pops up and you do need to replace the database file, you'll retain all those efforts. It doesn't take long to make the backup and it's good insurance.
    I've created an Automator workflow application (requires Tiger or later), iPhoto dB File Backup, that will copy the selected Library6.iPhoto file from your iPhoto Library folder to the Pictures folder, replacing any previous version of it. It's compatible with iPhoto 6 and 7 libraries and Tiger and Leopard. iPhoto does not have to be closed to run the application, just idle. You can download it at Toad's Cellar. Be sure to read the Read Me pdf file.
    Note: There now an Automator backup application for iPhoto 5 that will work with Tiger or Leopard.

  • How to separate RAW+JPG after import?

    Greetings:
    Is there a way to separate jpg files from a collection of RAW+JPG images after import?  They were imported without checking the "treat raw + jpg files separately" box in preferences.  Having worked with them, I would like to simply separate out the jpg sidecar files and quickly post the jpgs.
    Is there a way to do this?  I've tried changing preferences and re-importing from the combined image folder to another folder, but the resulting jpgs don't show up as files in Finder.
    Platform: Mac
    Software: Lightroom 4.4
    Thanks,
    Mike

    I'm looking for a solid solution within Lightroom too.
    Until that time, maybe http://www.robcole.com/Rob/ProductsAndServices/RawPlusJpegLrPlugin/ can help you?

  • Aperture 3.3 problems RAW+JPG Import

    After the update on Aperture 3.3 I have the following problem: Before import everything looks normal (see picture one). Aperture imports none jpg and Raw files as picture pairs and the Raw import looks completely colour-wrong. Moreover, there is no field more than Raw treatment
    Any idea for solving this problem?

    Also using a Panasonic (.RW2) I have had exactly the same problem, with exactly the same "colour effects". I did some varitions of importing and observed the following. The test shots were RAW only on a newly initialized SDHC card.
    In the import dialog, if RAW only was selected, no previews were shown. Same if JPG only. If RAW & JPG selected, a preview was shown (even there were no jpgs on the card).
    No presets, Auto Enhance and several others had no effect (i.e. same error).
    The photos imported perfectly using iPhoto, and were then perfect in Aperture.
    After thinking some, I suspect the preview image is the problem (I wished I'd exported them as tiff to see, but it was yesterday and I deleted the dodgy imports).
    I had some pictures (also .RW2) not in the library at all (I'd been using them to try out LR4). I drag/dropped them from a Finder-folder into Aperture,  (not import) by droppong them into the Inspector panael of Aperture; they were perfect BUT said they were RAW/JPG pairs which they were not.
    Come on Apple. There was a time when your software was bug-free. Nostalga isn't enough.

  • Import only jpg files from a camera that shoots RAW+jpg?

    Is there a way to import only jpg files from a camera that shoots both RAW+jpg? I only want the small jpgs copied, not the RAW file. I have the USB adapter and am about to go on vacation and wanted to use my iPad to upload pictures to Facebook on the go so I am going to shoot on my Canon 5D in RAW+jpg. All I want to copy to the iPad are the jpg files. Is there a way to only copy one?

    As a Test:
    Hold down the option (or alt) key and launch iPhoto. From the resulting menu select 'Create Library'
    Import a few pics into this new, blank library. Is the Problem repeated there?
    I would note there is a long-standing issue between Kodaks and some versions of OS X - the workaround for that is to use a USB Card reader.
    Regards
    TD

  • Raw files won't import when shot in raw+jpg

    I just shot in raw+jpg for the first time. Lightroom 4 won't import the raw file but will import the jpg. It says something like "lightroom doesn't support this raw file format". I don't get it though because if I shoot in just raw it will import fine.

    If your camera is supported by current version of Lightroom, then the raw file(s) should import.
    So, is Canon EOS Rebel XS 1000D supported by Lr4.3? If so, it should go (assuming you've got 4.3 installed), if no go, a bug report should be submitted, promptly, at:
    http://feedback.photoshop.com/photoshop_family/topics/new
    If not, consider a feature request ('Idea', for camera support) using same link.
    Rob

  • Importing High Res. JPG with RAW?

    Is there any reason to import JPG images with RAW images? I sometimes shoot high res. JPG with RAW just so I have some high res. JPGs for temporary use immediately after a shoot and for archival purposes, but I can't think of a reason to import JPGs into Lightroom when there is a RAW. Thanks for any clarification.
    Dilip

    with one option it let's you know the jpg exists, but you can do absolutely nothing with it, even delete it easily from within lr. The other treats them both seperately, and all controls can work on either file. To each their own I suppose but I see no compelling reason NOT to import them as seperate files, it only adds confusion to the managing of digital assets for me, as lr provides no means of seperating the combo designation after import.
    Many times I leave camera on raw+jpg mode even for snapshots, and decide the jpg is good enough and I don't desire to do any processing on the Raw. Other times the raw is easily superior, and the jpg is garbage. Treating them seperate puts me back in control of what I use and how. But, as I said different ways of working call for different ways of handling it; I'm glad we at least get an option to do it either way.

  • Importing raw + jpg, how can I see both?

    when my camera is set to Raw + Jpg and i import into LR, the thumbnail I see says it is the raw , how can I see the jpg? Both Raw and jpg images are listed in Finder. thank you

    You need to configure the Import preferences so that JPEGs are treated as separate files. See attachment.

  • How to handle RAW+JPG?

    Hi guys,
    Just downloaded LR4 trial, and there is something I can't quite figure out.
    I have a lot of RAW+JPG pictures (shot as RAW+JPG or previously converted from RAW to JPG with other programs), when importing them to Lightroom, I can choose to treat them as the same picture or as separate pictures.
    At first glance, they should of cause be treated as the same picture (because they are the same picture), and they do indeed appear as "RAW+JPG" in LR, but how do I:
    - View the JPG? (not critical, but it would be nice to be able to compare the JPG with the LR results)
    - Add metadata (tags, title, caption, etc.) to the JPG file and not just the RAW file? (I have enabled "write metadata to file")
    If treated as separate pictures, they behave as one would expect, but it is not that convenient to have two of the same pictures side-by-side.
    - Can I auto-stack RAWs and JPGs?
    - Can I write metadata (tags, title, caption, etc.) to the entire stack in one go?
    And please don't give me the same answer, I keep reading over and over again, when other people ask the same question: "Why would you have RAW and JPG of the same image?" That is not the question, but I will answer it anyway :-)
    1. I need JPG versions of my pictures for e-mail, web, viewing on my TV etc.
    2. I REALLY don't want to be dependent on LR in the future. If I have spend hours and hours fine tuning my pictures, and only have them saved as RAW, I would need LR till the day I die. And it doesn't end there, my kids, my grand kids and so on, would also need LR to view the pictures (at lease in the quality I would like them to be viewed).
    ~Frank

    That was also my feeling, that Lightroom's support for such is pretty little.
    Because it is not LR's concept.
    Frank,
    what you could do in order to further make up your mind to which extent LR might suit you:
    Use an alternative picture viewer (e.g. Irfanview) to compare JPGs.
    Copy your existing JPGs to a folder, but do not import them into LR (that means do not LR have creating pointers to them and records in the catalog-database).
    Import your raws into LR (that means you need to have some safe storage space for the image files themselves), and do your developments there. When you think you are ready, export** them as full-sized JPGs, renamed e.g. by a suffix -LR, into your JPG-folders. Do not add such export to your LR catalog.
    Use the alternative picture viewer to compare how you did, compared to your camera's auto-conversion.
    To further ease your mind regarding dependancy on LR: most of your develop settings can be written back to the raw file's xmp-part (that is a sidecar-file for a proprietary raw format such as Nikon's .NEF or Canon's .CR2, or embedded for a DNG, PSD or TIFF).
    This xmp can be read by many other other programs.
    So you would have your raws enriched.
    Plus you could decide to store your exported JPGs *forever*.
    Pretty independant from Lightroom, no?
    Should you want to ultimately rely on raw-conversion results, I would go for different software, e.g. DxO.
    Cornelia
    **exporting means: LR is making use of its records as rendering instructions and writes a completely new file, in the format you specify for this export, e.g. JPG.
    LR is a database, that contains records ABOUT images. It reads from them, it writes to their xmp-part if tell it to do so (choice is continuously or upon separate command for selected images), it can write other output, e.g. a PDF working as a slide show, a web gallery, a print, a book.

  • How to import only RAW images from folder with RAW & JPEGs?

    My system is set up that I have both RAW & JPEGs in the same folder since I shoot JPEG+RAW. How can I import just the raw images without also sucking in the jpegs? There is no way to distinguish the difference in the Import box and also no way to easily separate the the two in the Import box. I've tried using the List View and separting them by File Size, but Aperture has a stupid bug here and it tells me that the JPEG file sizes are in the teens (like 17-18 megs) and they are still hard to separate from the RAW which are about the same size.
    Why can't Aperture do this basic thing?

    I'm not doing anything. What I wrote in my workflow example above is exactly what I'm doing. I've been trying some experiments to see if it was "A Better Finder Rename" that is causing the issue. So far, no go. I have taken just a couple of JPGs only and pointed Aperture's Import to the folder that contains them. Aperture is reading that there are only 2 jpegs (which is what there is) and their file size is right on the mark.
    Ok. I just narrowed it down to something. The flaw is showing up after the RAW files are converted to DNGs. The JPEGs do not show up in the Import box when there are camera raw files like NEFs or CR2s and the corresponding JPEGs. That is Aperture's normal behaviour. But, and this is a big BUT, when the raw files are converted to DNGs and they are in the same folder as the corresponding JPEGs, that's when Aperture pulls its shenanigans. It has something to do with the JPEGs and DNGs having the same name. Even though the files have different extensions, Aperture is doing something to the file size of the JPEGs that make them seem that they are much larger files than they actually are.
    I figured it out like this:
    I had 2 CR2 files and the corresponding JPEGs in a folder. Pointing Aperture's Import to that folder, Aperture did what it is supposed to do; it saw only 2 raw files (doesn't matter that the G9 CR2 files are not supported yet). So, I renamed all the files using A Better Finder Rename and Aperture still only saw 2 raw files.
    So far so good.
    Then, I converted just the 2 CR2 files to DNG and kept them in the same folder. Aperture saw 2 DNGs and 2 CR2 files. No jpegs were seen. Business as usual. Then I removed the CR2s and renamed the jpegs so they had the same names as the DNGs (except for of course different extensions) and that's when Aperture saw the jpegs as separate files and saw them with bogus file sizes.
    So I tested that by altering the jpeg names so that they were different from their corresponding DNGs and Aperture went back to seeing the jpegs with the correct file sizes.
    Therefore, Aperture is having some difficulty with two separate files, one JPEG and the other DNG, when they both have the same name (different extensions, of course).
    Try it if you have a moment. Take one raw file and convert it to DNG and place it in a folder with its corresponding jpeg. Rename both to the same name and different extensions (.dng + .jpg) and see what happens when you try to get Aperture to import. Chance are Aperture will show bogus file sizes for the jpeg.
    Let me know if that's clear.
    Antonio

  • Raw + JPG from two cards

    With the D3, I write RAW images on one card slot and JPG to the other. When I shoot with other cameras that do not have two card slots and shoot Raw+JPG to the same card, LR is set up to treat these pairs of files as one. When I batch rename, both files get renamed. The problem is that I do not know of a way to "combine" the Raw and the JPG when they are copied from two separate cards but otherwise are the same photo. Does LR have a way to do this after the fact?
    The reason why I want to do this is to use LR to rate, sort and renumber the images from a shoot. End prints will be made from the Raw files. But I'd like to use the camera JPG's as the basis for uploading the images to the web quickly. The raw images often need more tweaking than the JPG for web delivery. To get the images online quickly, I need to use the JPG versions. And in order to do this and not rate both a raw and the same jpg, I need for LR to see them as the "same" file. Can this be done?

    Jao, thanks for your post. The reason why I do need to treat the +JPGs as one file is specifically so that I can rate and rename them.
    It would be nice if LR allowed you to import Raw+JPG as one but then gave you an option to display one or the other type of file. This way, I could go through the JPG's faster for rating as the files are smaller, but still apply the rating to the RAW files. Then I could also create a web site from the JPG's in LR w/o doing anything special as well. When I am ready to make adjustments to the RAW files, I could set the LR switch to only display and adjust the RAW files. Since LR is already smart enough to treat them as "one file", I would not think it would be a stretch to add a display option to display one file type or the other.
    But back to my original post, I think that the solution that you have provided should work. I can simply copy the files to the hard drive first from the two cards and when I import the files into LR, LR should then know to keep the RAW and JPG files together.
    Once the rating and renaming is done on the combined files, I can simply create a windows folder with just the files that are rated high enough to put on my web site for the shoot. Then, I could either re-import just the JPG files into a catalog to create a web site of just the JPG's, or easily use Bridge to segregate out only the JPG files to create a web site using Bridge. While these procedures are not ideal, they are easy and will work quickly to accommodate hundreds of images. So the only missing piece for my was copying the images to the hard drive before importing them into LR. Thanks for the tip!

  • RAW+JPG renaming/deleting workflow broken?

    I tried to shoot RAW + JPG.
    LR show only the NEF files [RAW] and uses the JPGs as a "sidecar".
    if I rename teh NEF the JPG gets renamed with the same filename and the proper different extension.
    the problem is when I delete the rejected NEF files - the corresponding/relative JPGs don't get deleted as well
    and I need to do it manually in the finder outside of LR,
    am i doing something wrong? I find this behavior inconsistent and it could be annoying if I need to do that with many files at once.
    I can always download the images from teh camera to TEMP download folder - move the good photos to a different folder and empty the JPGs that have not deleted.
    a bit of a cumbersome workflow...
    stefano
    stefpix dot com
    yesterday's photos
    http://tinyurl.com/27fazg
    or
    http://picasaweb.google.com/stefpix/BedstuyFlatbushMiniHaiti300320072309/photo#s5047923753 755028194

    Amazing, so it's actually intentionally 'broken'. At the very very least, mentioning this in the manual would have been nice...(or did I miss it?) I can see where they're coming from as seen from a *particular* workflow perspective, but they are making some pretty big assumptions along the way, all of which can be challenged.
    Assumption (1): RAW and JPG files with the same name are *always* both created in the camera.
    - I'm not sure if I'm the only one, but I have sometimes saved rendered JPGs (from RawShooter) alongside my RAW files. The upcoming(?) RawShooter settings conversion utility will not give the exact same results, so I'd like to keep the JPGs in my library.
    Assumption (2): The JPG is always inferior to the Lightroom-rendered RAW.
    - Not true. Sometimes the camera vendors employ some sophisticated wizardry to their JPGs that can sometimes yield satisfying final results or a good reference for raw editing. I suspect this holds even more for the newer batch of SLRs that supports 'in-camera developing', applying proprietary coloring effects, etc to the rendered JPG.
    Assumption (3): People get horribly confused when they see *choose* to shoot RAW+JPG and actually see two files.
    - Well, I'm probably not the target market, since I'm one of those 'organized' photographers, but ok. If I have chosen to create two files that every other imaging program considers to be different, I have consciously done so, and I do not get confused if I see different files. In fact, I *expect* all my files to show up in Lightroom. Of course having neat options to hide either type of files is a plus.
    As for suggestions to improve this in future versions, I'd say:
    * Make it an option (selected by default) to not import sidecar JPGs and use them only for preview. [mentioned in Podcast]
    * Implement auto-stacking for files with the same name. [mentioned in Podcast]
    * Even better, allow for auto-stacking with similar names (using a suffix, like '-') and images that were shot at the same time. See also http://www.adobeforums.com/cgi-bin/webx/.3bc34b40/1
    * Implement a command to sort the images in all stacks in the current view. This could be used to place all RAWs or JPGs on top.
    * Implement a synchronization feature that synchronizes (selected) keywords and collections across stacks. [deals with mentioned keyword problem]
    * As an alternative to all stack-based options above, simply implement a viewing filter to only show files of a certain type within the currently selected category. This way, people can easily remove all JPGs from view.
    Cheers,
    Simon

Maybe you are looking for

  • How can i get my iPad back on the internet?

    Everything wad down today...cable, internet, etc.  Now it is back.  My iMac is right back on line and all is well.  The iPad, though, says I am not connected to the internet and nothing is working.  How do I get the iPad back on line.  I checked the

  • Correcting for low lighting using FCP

    Hi, I am trying to correct for low lighting conditions of a some scenes I shot using an XL2 MiniDV Camera. Any suggestions? The scenes were shot in 24P 16:9 at 1/48. Best, Gary

  • How to publish a website in iweb to safari by "Publish to Local Folder"?

    yep

  • Numbers App

    I would like comments on the Numbers App for Mac, not Ipad or I phone.  I only have a Mac.  I just want a basic program to keep track of expenses and help with budgeting household expenses.

  • Ack, CD Stuck in drive!

    I got a new printer for Christmas, an HP Deskjet F380 All in One, I set up the actual printer fine, but when I went to install the software, things got a little funny. First an error window popped up, then there were two installation windows. Anyway,