In AFAR amount is not calculate in 2008

Hello Experts,
while doing T Code : AFAR for fiscal year 2007 that time amount is calculate.
i.e: Old amt. , New amt. , Difference amt
123.00 ; 23.00 ; 100.00
while doing T Code : AFAR for fiscal year 2008 that time amount is calculate.
i.e: Old amt. , New amt. , Difference amt
00.00 ; 100.00  ; 100.00
Amount is not calculate as per the depreciation key rate in 2008.
waiting for reply.
Thanks

When you change the depreciation key it will only correct the depreciation for the current year and not old fiscal years or you have to run that old years.
When you make a change use the following transactions to correct the depreciation for the old years:
ABZU - Write-Up
ABAA - Unplanned Depreciation

Similar Messages

  • Error Message FF747  -The tax amount must not be greater than the tax base

    Hello,
    We are attempting to post an import vendor invoice through transaction    FB60 for Israel company code . Since the tax charged by the vendor is not fixed every time , we are entering the tax amount in the    FB60 screen manually , without selecting 'calculate tax'.The amount of tax is greater than the amount of expense as per the real business scenario. For example amount of expense is 100, amount of tax is 200 and the total amount charged by the vendor is 300 .However when we simulate the posting we get an error - The tax amount must not be greater than the tax base-Message no. FF747
    We tried putting a very high percentage in the tax code also but it didn't help
    We would like to go ahead with this posting. Could you pl throw light on the same . ? Is there any way (OSS note ) or a work around which can resolve the issue ?
    Best Regards
    Amit  Kulkarni

    Hello
    This may be  a work around in other cases , but since we want the amount to be updated in the BSET table for further VAT reports , we would like  this to be posted along with the expense item

  • Retention amount is not capturing in cheque counter folio

    Dear All,
    While processing check with retention amount  in cheque out put the retention amount is not condsidering.
    Please see the following document i created with retention amount.
    21 TRBA         KOVA M/S.BHAGWATI ASSOCIA         5,000.00
    31 TRBA         KOVA M/S.BHAGWATI ASSOCIA        48,867.00
    39 TRBA         KOVA M/S.BHAGWATI ASSOCIA         5,000.00
    40 79102             PUB.ISSUE-W.OFF             50,000.00
    50 41452        KOVA TDSP  CONTR. PAY.            1,100.00
    50 41452        KOVA TDSP  CONTR. PAY.               22.00
    50 41452        KOVA TDSP  CONTR. PAY.               11.00
    i posted document with retention amount 5000 when i am processing the check in output the retention amount is capturing in the output,
    this is check management here the amount it will give excluding retention amount.
    1500001307 TRBA       M/S.BHAGWATI ASSOCIATES    GANDHI BRIDGE CORNE                               43,867.00
    where i am checking the same document in output its giving including the retention amount.
                                            10015
                    M/S.BHAGWATI ASSOCIATES
                                                     16.05.2008           50,000.00
        2, TEXTILE TECHNICIAN SOCIETY GANDHI BRIDGE
                                                        1,133.00          48,867.00
    CORNER, AHMEDABAD-
                                16.05.2008    50,000.00      0.00     0.00     0.00  1,13
                                Not Over Rs ********48867.00/-
                                                                          16.05.2008
            M/S.BHAGWATI ASSOCIATES
                      Forty Eight Thousand Eight Hundred Sixty Seven
                                                                      *******48,867.00
                    and Paise zero Only.
    Please advise how to modify.
    regards
    ramu
    Edited by: bangaru mohan on May 16, 2008 11:27 AM

    Dear Sanjay
    thnks for your replay
    But how can I add these values(vat-5% and Surcharge-10% on vat ) in to inventory acount
    The accounting document generated at the time of GRN should have the material price +Total Tax amount
    Expecting your reply
    Thnks again

  • "FI: Postings" is not allowed (WBS 2008/00697/01/01)

    Hi SAP Guru's,
    When i try to post G/L(F-02) with WBS element,System shows this error.
    "FI: Postings" is not allowed (WBS 2008/00697/01/01)...
    Please help us......
    Thanks in advance...
    Thanks & Regards,
    Sri

    Hello Srinath,
    The potential issues have been already highlighted. Just look at them one by one in the below order
    1) Check the WBS status.
    It can happen that the WBS is not released. In that event, release the WBS and try the postings again.
    2) Check the account assignment operative indicator in the WBS element.
      if this is unchecked, system will not allow any actual postings
    3) Check if the period to which you are trying to post the amount is opened in FI or not. if not, open them.
    Otherwise, relax and have a nice cup of cappuccino...The issue is hiding elsewhere and would need further investigation. You can always come to us (SDN)
    Thanks,
    Nithin

  • Dynamics not working in 2008 that did work in 4.5

    Post Author: ck1938
    CA Forum: Xcelsius and Live Office
    Hi.  I have a dashboard originally built in 4.5 that doesn't work properly in 2008.  The dashboard has a list box with the regions we have our sales force broken down into with the first region being a conglomeration of all regions called national.  In the 4.5 version I can highlight the South East region for example and it gives me a list of salesmen for that region.  There are 4 pie charts that show different activities and in 4.5 once you click on South East, the first sales person is automatically highlighted the pie charts all change to reflect his sales figures.  I can go to another salesman or region and the sales figures update approriately.  If I go back to national all teh charts update appropriately as well.   In 2008 when I click on the South East region it shows me a list of salesmen with the first one highlighted but the charts still show the national data.  To get the charts to update I need to click on another salesman and then go back to the first one.  If I try to go to national the charts never update so once someone clicks off national they can never get the charts back for it unless they close and reopen the file.  The old dashboard would not open in 2008 so I had to rebuild it manually.  Evrything appears identical but I could easily have missed something.  Does anyone have any ideas on how to get the functionality working normally again?

    yes, i think apple really needs to address this issue. i dont know if they havent made the iphone 4 fully backwards compatible with older bluetooth hardware, but my infiniti FX45 is only a 2008.
    bluetooth cuts out all the time, goes back and forth between the radio and the phone, and is completely unreliable. i have the latest iOS installed.
    basically cant use bluetooth hands free at all in my car anymore. my iphone 3g and 3gs did okay, didnt have this problem. what gives?
    first the antenna problem, and now this. common apple... dont make me go buy a droid.
    fix this problem please.

  • In fbl1n report for document type RE  withholding tax amount is not showing

    in fbl1n report for document type RE  withholding tax amount is not showing
    in sap note 363309 determines
    Solution
    Remove the field which contains the withholding tax information (field BSEG-QSSHB) from your display
    variant.
    If you want to display the withholding tax information, double-click on the document number and
    subsequently choose 'Withholding tax'.
    my doubt is we remove the field BSEG-QSSHB in layout how can show the withholding tax amount in FBLIN report
    how to remove from the layout
    please clarefy
    bhayyapu   

    Hi,
    If you want to check amounts of withholding tax for the vendors, you have some options to view it. You can access the WITH_ITEM, LFC1 tables by SE16. You have too the S_P00_07000134 report. This report is developed for the Colombia but I already used for the another country with the ABAP development for this country.
    Also you can use table join BSIK and WITH_ITEM by SQVI for the open items and BSAK and WITH_ITEM for cleared items. It is more simple and fast.
    JPA

  • The page total amount is not correct on discoverer plus 10.1.1.48.18

    on my discoverer report, there is sunnary field based on a column.
    for example, I have a salesrep expense discoverer report.
    the salesrep name is the page item, each page has one salesrep, under the page item there are many line which show the expense detail amount, there is a column called expense, under the expense column there is a total amount summary field to sum the expense for this salesrep.
    Sometimes, the total amount is not the sum of the expense column, sometimes the total amount show negative zero as: -0.00. What I thought this maybe a number round issue.
    Does anybody has similar issue? how to fix this ?
    Thanks

    I actually used toad to run the query and exported to EXCEL then sum it in excel, I got the correct total amount.
    the following is the SQL query, we use the total feature to sum the commission:
    select
    pt.payee_salesrep_id,
    sr.name||','||sr.attribute9 salesrep_name,
    sr.attribute15 employee_number,
    pt.payrun_id,
    pr.name payrun_name,
    decode(pt.incentive_type_code,'COMMISSION',2,'PMTPLN',4,'PMTPLN_REC',1,'MANUAL_PAY_ADJ',2) Sort,
    decode(pt.incentive_type_code, 'PMTPLN','To be Applied in Future','PMTPLN_REC','Previous Payments Affecting Commissions',q.description) Variable,
    sum(decode(pt.incentive_type_code,
    'COMMISSION',decode(q.attribute3,'ARR 12-36',apps.sg_oic_reports.get_multiple(q.name,to_number(ch.attribute16)),1) sign(pt.payment_amount) abs(pt.input_achieved) ,
    pt.payment_amount)
    ) Revenue,
    sum(pt.payment_amount) commission
    from apps.cn_payment_transactions pt,
    apps.cn_commission_headers ch,
    apps.jtf_rs_salesreps sr,
    apps.cn_quotas q,
    apps.cn_payruns pr
    WHERE pt.quota_id = q.quota_id
    and ch.commission_header_id(+) = pt.commission_header_id
    and pt.payee_salesrep_id = sr.salesrep_id
    and pt.payrun_id = pr.payrun_id
    and hold_flag <> 'Y'
    and pr.accounting_period_id>2005012
    and pt.payment_amount<>0
    group by
    pt.payee_salesrep_id,
    sr.name||','||sr.attribute9,
    sr.attribute15,
    pt.payrun_id,
    pr.name,
    pt.incentive_type_code,
    decode(pt.incentive_type_code,'COMMISSION',2,'PMTPLN',4,'PMTPLN_REC',1,'MANUAL_PAY_ADJ',2) ,
    decode(pt.incentive_type_code, 'PMTPLN','To be Applied in Future','PMTPLN_REC','Previous Payments Affecting Commissions',q.description)
    having sum(pt.payment_amount) <>0

  • Group cur. amount and local curr. amount are not matching in CO88 Settlemen

    Hi Gurus,
        After settlement in CO88  for some process orders only in settlement accounting doc Group currency amount is not calucalted correctly against Local currency amount . Pls find details below
    For one process order in co88 setllment accounting document local currecny amount 12312.89 RSD  , In BKPF table i have chekced the doc has picked to convert it in to Group currecny (USD) exchange rate type M and  indirect exchange rate from RSD to USD  71.96. The document posted on 30.6.2011 , exchange rate maintaied in TCURR table on 01.06.2011 as 71.96. SO The system has picked correctly upto this.
                    As per this Group currecny amount should be = 12312.89/ 71.96 = 171.10
    But system posted Group currecny  as  = 45.74 USD , 
           How the system posted 45.74 in USD. Pls suggest what could be the reasons for this .This is happening only for some process orders.
    Thanks & regds
    Ramachandra

    thank you

  • Excise amount is not picking up in j1in

    we are using taxinn
    when we do the billing excise amount is picked up and accounting entry is passed accordingly
    while doing excise invoice creation (j1in) bed amount is not upading? where we have committed the mistake
    thanks in advance
    joseph

    Hi
      Check whether under A/R BED Cond you have JEXT and under BED Perc you have JEXP ( default is JMOD under BED perc) for you tax procedure TAXINN . If you maintain this setting you will be able to see BED values. Also check in your billing document both the condition types has the duty values. If JEXT condition type does not have the duty values then maintatin 100% condtion record for this.
    Regards
    MBS

  • Excise is not calculate in invoice verification

    Dear All,
    I have one issue.
    We have create purchase order for project with account assignment category Q.
    We put excise (10.30) & Vat 15% in purchase order.
    In purchase order all value calculate properly. Good Receipt created against purchase order.
    Now we create invoice verification againat purchase order.
    but at time of invoice verfication creatoin excise value in not calculate properly in invoice verification, only 15% vat calculate in invoice verification.
    All excise detail(J1id) has been maintain for material & vendor master and i have also check tax code in FTXP. All are well maintain.     
    We have capture excise invoice at the time of good receipt creation.
    But Excise value is not calculate
    Regards,
    Mahesh Wagh

    Hi,
    If the excise invoice is not posted (Part-II), then it will not flow in MIRO.  Pls check same. 
    You may even check whether the capter id assigned to the material is extended to new excise calculation period.
    Regards,

  • PR00 does not calculate / deleted for TANN in R/3 for CRM order - Free Good

    I hv done free good configuration both in R/3 and CRM.
    Main Category - TAN and Free good category - TANN
    Pricing for TANN = PR00 and ZFRE -100% discount
    When I see result in R/3 and CRM, it does populate PR00 and calculate ZFRE.
    While in Order creation in CRM it does calculated PR00 and ZFRE, on order save it replicates order in R/3 but in R/3 it does not calculate or retain PR00 & ZFRE value as a result I'm getting price log error in R/3 saying mandatory condition PR00 missing. Where as in CRM it does not impact calculate pricing.
    Note: I don't want to retain PR00 as a mandatory condition and I don't want to change my calculation. Is there any technical solution to achieve this.
    Thanks,
    Nilesh P.

    Hi Nilesh P,
    Have you set the parameter PRICINGTYPE to G in table SMOFPARSFA as per note 490932 - 'G' = Copy price components unchanged. If so then the only possibility is to debug the transfer to ERP as per note 656823 in order to determine where the condition value is initialized.
    I hope this helps.
    Kind regards,
    Vanessa.

  • Exchange rate fluctuatuion amount is not generated in F-28

    Hi Gurus,
                  when making partial payment from foreign customer in F-28, the Exchange rate fluctuation amount is not generated. But when making full payment from the foreign customer, exchange rate Fluctuation amount is generated.
    For eg: At the time of billing the document, the amount is 1050 USD @ 46.4500
                Now there are paying a partial amount of 1000 USD @ 46.3000
                Now the difference amount between 46.45 & 46.30 has to generated at time of payment.
                But its not happening.
    Can anyone help me to find a solution.

    Hi Satish,
    While making Partial Payments also you can post forex gain/Loss but for that a little configuration is required. The IMG path is :-
    Financial Accounting Global Settings (New)>Global parameters for Company code>Currencies>Indicate Currency Differences for partial payments.
    Here against the document type, which you are using for making partial payments you have to tick that doc type and then the Forex gain/Loss gets posted even on partial payments.
    Regards,
    SAPFICO

  • Excise base amount is not changing as per the scheduling agreement

    Sub: in migo excise base amount is not changing as per the scheduling agreement type LP ( time dependent ).
    I have created the scheduling agreement type LP with time dependent.
    I have maintained the price value in two validated period i.e
    01/07/08 to 31/07/08 price is 100 rs.
    01/08/08 to 31/08/08 price is 200 rs.
    I have maintained the delivery schedule on
    15/07/08 of quantity 1 nos.
    When I am doing the goods receipts for the scheduling agreement on
    Document date I am giving 15/07/08.
    Posting date I am giving 15/07/08.
    I am giving the posting date in the excise also 15/07/08.
    After item ok.
    When I will the excise base value it is taking 200 and also excise duty is also calculating on 200.
    When I will post the document
    The stock account and GR/IR account is taking 100 only
    And excise duty is posting for rs: 200 only
    Why the excise base value is not changing as per the validity period.
    What setting I have to do the change the excise base value as per the validity date maintained in the time dependent .
    regards
    jrp

    dear sir
    doc date and posting date i have given 15/07/08 and also excise posting date i have given 15/07/08,
    but excise base value it is taking Rs:200 .
    in inforecord price date category 5-goods recepit date i have given
    yes i ahve changed the excise base value it will post , if i will not change the excise base  value i will post rs:200 only and GR/IR clearing account will post Rs100 only.
    why the excise base value will not take based on the time dependent.
    regards
    JRP

  • TDS TAX AMOUNT  IS NOT MACHING WITH INVOICE WTAX AMOUNTu2019

    Dear All,
    I am Facing Following Problem in TDS
    While creating an A/P Invoice after putting row level information when user click on u2018ADDu2019 button u201CWithholding Tax Tableu201D opens for deduction of TDS amount. When user selects u201CWithholding Tax Codeu201D in u201CWithholding Tax Tableu201D to deduct TDS amount for an invoice system shows WTax amount as per rate of deduction. But when user click on u2018OKu2019 to u201CWithholding Tax Tableu201D window, WTax Amount will comes as zero on A/P Invoice window.
    Then when again user will go to u201CWithholding Tax Tableu201D and manually put the value of WTax Amount system reflects it on A/P Invoice window.
    In case when we set approval procedure to A/P Invoice, this invoice goes for an approval. After coming back as approved invoice when originator of invoice going to u2018ADDu2019 the same document system shows an error as u2018TDS TAX AMOUNT  IS NOT MACHING WITH INVOICE WTAX AMOUNTu2019
    please reply me ASAP
    Thanks & Regards,
    Swapnil

    hi
    try this
    We need to follow  the following steps
    u2022     Open the BP master for which TDS needs to be deducted go to the accounting tab followed by tax option and then  click on the checkbox subject to withholding tax
    u2022     Click on the option WTAX codes Allowed and select the TDS Category
    u2022     On the previous window click the check box pertaining the checkbox  u201CTDS OVERLOOKu201D
    Regards,
    Manish

  • FBL1( VENDOR LEDGER REPORT)-  Withholding tax amount is not coming .

    in FBL1 ( vENDOR lEDGER rEPORT) - WITHHOLDING TAX AMOUNT IS NOT CMING IN COLUMN  QBSHB OF FBL1.
    Purchasing document number is not coming also.
    How these fields may appear in the above said report. Is any config missing ?
    Thanks in advance
    M K Agarwal
    9967029930

    TDS posted from MIRO will not reflect in line item report, i have taken opinion from SAP for the same issue few days back, SAP has given the following opinion.
    *With reference to the difference in behaviour as compared to the document posted for example from MIRO which is an MM transaction and FB60 which is a FI transaction please note the following:
    The withholding tax amount that you are using i.e. Field BSEG-QBSHB is designed to fill for the classic withholding tax. And extended withholding tax information is stored exclusive in table WITH_ITEM.
    Also note that MIRO does not give the user the control in case of Classical withholding tax. It only supports Extended withholding tax. Hence it does not populate BSEG fields in case of Extended WT.
    So in MIRO, the data for extended withholding tax are saved within the table WITH_ITEM and not within the table entry BSEG-QBSHB. The latter isnot updated during the procedure. Furthermore it is not possible to select data from table WITH_ITEM
    within the transaction FBL1N in a transparent and unique way, as FBL1N only reads BSEG / BSIK / BSAK tables.
    In your line layout,you define a field BSEG-QBSHB. But actually the field of vendor/customer line item is filled with zero from FI. Thus,it shows zero in line item display*
    Please review note 363309 for detailed explanation and explains the functionality which is valid even for your release.
    So it is not possible to display withholding tax information in the line item display transactions, since this information is not
    held in the BSEG / BSIK / BSAK tables, but is instead stored in the WITH_ITEM table.
    Please convey to your client, standard SAP will not show the TDS information in line item reports, documents posted from MIRO and refer  the note 363309.

Maybe you are looking for