TDS TAX AMOUNT IS NOT MACHING WITH INVOICE WTAX AMOUNTu2019

Dear All,
I am Facing Following Problem in TDS
While creating an A/P Invoice after putting row level information when user click on u2018ADDu2019 button u201CWithholding Tax Tableu201D opens for deduction of TDS amount. When user selects u201CWithholding Tax Codeu201D in u201CWithholding Tax Tableu201D to deduct TDS amount for an invoice system shows WTax amount as per rate of deduction. But when user click on u2018OKu2019 to u201CWithholding Tax Tableu201D window, WTax Amount will comes as zero on A/P Invoice window.
Then when again user will go to u201CWithholding Tax Tableu201D and manually put the value of WTax Amount system reflects it on A/P Invoice window.
In case when we set approval procedure to A/P Invoice, this invoice goes for an approval. After coming back as approved invoice when originator of invoice going to u2018ADDu2019 the same document system shows an error as u2018TDS TAX AMOUNT IS NOT MACHING WITH INVOICE WTAX AMOUNTu2019
please reply me ASAP
Thanks & Regards,
Swapnil

hi
try this
We need to follow the following steps
u2022     Open the BP master for which TDS needs to be deducted go to the accounting tab followed by tax option and then click on the checkbox subject to withholding tax
u2022     Click on the option WTAX codes Allowed and select the TDS Category
u2022     On the previous window click the check box pertaining the checkbox u201CTDS OVERLOOKu201D
Regards,
Manish

Similar Messages

Invoice tax amount is not equal to the calculated tax amount

Hi All,
I'm importing AP invoices through Open Interface R12.
Lines includes Tax lines as well. But Invoices become held when I try to validate.
I'm getting this hold reason: "Invoice tax amount is not equal to the calculated tax amount"
Can anybody advise please ?
Thanks,

Use T. code SM30 and give table name J_1IT030K_V and click on maintain button give your chart of account, press enter here assign appropriate G/L A/C against Tax code MK.

Error Message FF747 -The tax amount must not be greater than the tax base

Hello,
We are attempting to post an import vendor invoice through transaction FB60 for Israel company code . Since the tax charged by the vendor is not fixed every time , we are entering the tax amount in the FB60 screen manually , without selecting 'calculate tax'.The amount of tax is greater than the amount of expense as per the real business scenario. For example amount of expense is 100, amount of tax is 200 and the total amount charged by the vendor is 300 .However when we simulate the posting we get an error - The tax amount must not be greater than the tax base-Message no. FF747
We tried putting a very high percentage in the tax code also but it didn't help
We would like to go ahead with this posting. Could you pl throw light on the same . ? Is there any way (OSS note ) or a work around which can resolve the issue ?
Best Regards
Amit Kulkarni

Hello
This may be a work around in other cases , but since we want the amount to be updated in the BSET table for further VAT reports , we would like this to be posted along with the expense item

FBL1( VENDOR LEDGER REPORT)- Withholding tax amount is not coming .

in FBL1 ( vENDOR lEDGER rEPORT) - WITHHOLDING TAX AMOUNT IS NOT CMING IN COLUMN QBSHB OF FBL1.
Purchasing document number is not coming also.
How these fields may appear in the above said report. Is any config missing ?
Thanks in advance
M K Agarwal
9967029930

TDS posted from MIRO will not reflect in line item report, i have taken opinion from SAP for the same issue few days back, SAP has given the following opinion.
*With reference to the difference in behaviour as compared to the document posted for example from MIRO which is an MM transaction and FB60 which is a FI transaction please note the following:
The withholding tax amount that you are using i.e. Field BSEG-QBSHB is designed to fill for the classic withholding tax. And extended withholding tax information is stored exclusive in table WITH_ITEM.
Also note that MIRO does not give the user the control in case of Classical withholding tax. It only supports Extended withholding tax. Hence it does not populate BSEG fields in case of Extended WT.
So in MIRO, the data for extended withholding tax are saved within the table WITH_ITEM and not within the table entry BSEG-QBSHB. The latter isnot updated during the procedure. Furthermore it is not possible to select data from table WITH_ITEM
within the transaction FBL1N in a transparent and unique way, as FBL1N only reads BSEG / BSIK / BSAK tables.
In your line layout,you define a field BSEG-QBSHB. But actually the field of vendor/customer line item is filled with zero from FI. Thus,it shows zero in line item display*
Please review note 363309 for detailed explanation and explains the functionality which is valid even for your release.
So it is not possible to display withholding tax information in the line item display transactions, since this information is not
held in the BSEG / BSIK / BSAK tables, but is instead stored in the WITH_ITEM table.
Please convey to your client, standard SAP will not show the TDS information in line item reports, documents posted from MIRO and refer the note 363309.

FF747 Tax amount must not be greater than the tax base

We have sample orders where the order amount is calculated and then discounted fully. However, our freight goes to our tax software separately due to different taxability rules. Therefore, the original tax amount (pre-discount) is sent and we end up with FF 747: The tax amount must not be greater than the tax base.
The business wants to track this freight amount. How do we change the message from error to warning or does anyone have a work around so we can invoice these customers?
Thanks,
Michelle

Hello ,
I am facing the same issue. Could you please let me know how you resolved it ?
Thanks.

In fbl1n report for document type RE withholding tax amount is not showing

in fbl1n report for document type RE withholding tax amount is not showing
in sap note 363309 determines
Solution
Remove the field which contains the withholding tax information (field BSEG-QSSHB) from your display
variant.
If you want to display the withholding tax information, double-click on the document number and
subsequently choose 'Withholding tax'.
my doubt is we remove the field BSEG-QSSHB in layout how can show the withholding tax amount in FBLIN report
how to remove from the layout
please clarefy
bhayyapu

Hi,
If you want to check amounts of withholding tax for the vendors, you have some options to view it. You can access the WITH_ITEM, LFC1 tables by SE16. You have too the S_P00_07000134 report. This report is developed for the Colombia but I already used for the another country with the ABAP development for this country.
Also you can use table join BSIK and WITH_ITEM by SQVI for the open items and BSAK and WITH_ITEM for cleared items. It is more simple and fast.
JPA

Item's withholding tax amount is not zero

Dear All,
When ever we clear the vendor account through f.13 system was showing the below mentioned message.
S No customer documents selected
S No G/L account documents selected
I Only accounts with debit and credit postings are included
X Item's withholding tax amount is not zero 0101 K 319936 13000031 105352237 1
X Item's withholding tax amount is not zero 0101 K 319936 13000031 105352237 2
I Stop date " 02.01.2010 Stop time " 17:00:00
Client is asking no need to show Items withholding tax amount is not zero message.
Where as the clearing criteria is business place .
Regards,
Teja

Hi,
please refer to the note 499902 and 442588 for the explanation why the transaction F.13 has given out
this error and which transactions (FBZ2 or F-53) should be used to clear the items with the withholding tax info maintained.
Reg
Madhu M

The tax amount must not be greater than the tax base

Hi Experts,
User is trying to "Relase to Account" in t-code VF01 he is getting an error message The tax amount must not be greater than the tax base.
During Debuging i found the error is raised in Function module RV_ACCOUNTING_DOCUMENT_CREATE
Message raised is
Message Class : FF
Message number: 747
Mesage "The tax amount must not be greater than the tax base"
Request to through some lights on this issue.
Reagrds
Sree

Hi,
did you check SAPNET notes with "VF01" and the message class/number as search terms. There are some notes dealing with this case eg 872449, and 184985.
Best regards, Christian

Tax amount is not appearing in consumption history of earmarked fund

Dear Experts,
It is a requirement from my customer, the tax item be populated with the same earmarked fund, commitment item, functional area, funds center and fund of the related expense or revenue item.
The transaction OBBH and the exit presented in attachment was used to try to achieve that requirement.
The accounting document was correctly created with the tax item correctly populated with the earmarked fund, commitment item, functional area, funds center and fund from the related expense item.
The funds management document was also correctly created including the tax item with the correct commitment item, fund, funds center and functional area.
The problem detected is related with the missing tax value in consumption history of the earmarked fund. The value of the tax item is not appearing in records of tables KBLP and FMIOI.
Could you please help me with this problem?
Kind Regards,
Rui Neves

Hi,
Thanks for your answer. We are reimplementing the REFX solution for a company. The existing system is also in ECC6. For contracts made in existing system when periodic posting done, tax is shown against both contract and rental object. The value of periodic posting is same for both contract and rental object.
However, in the new implementation, tax amount is not appearing against rental rental object. Tax amount is appearing against rental contract. As a result, there is a difference in amount. Is this correct as a process ?
Regards,
T Saravanan

Tax Amount is not updated into BSEG

Dear All,
I have recently added a tax amount field MWSTS from table BSEG into FBL1N - Vendor Line Item Display. To my surprise the input tax amount is not updated into BSEG table. The input tax is normally posted using either MIRO or FB60.
Any one has the same problem? Can please kindly share how to fix the problem?
Thanks in advance for your kind assisstance.
rgds,
Dahlia

Thanks Andreas,
However I do believe that it should be updated into BSEG - MWSTS as we have mutliple companies in different countries in the system. All the other companies have the input rate updated into BSEG - MWSTS for the vendor line item, only the company for India is not updated.
Yes, BSET do have the tax amount updated but I can't use BSET table in FBL1N. I need to provide the tax amount information for each vendor line item in FBL1N.
thks
Dahlia

Why the doc total amount is not matched with the total item line amount?

Hi,
Recently when i try to update something in sales order via my add-on, i got an error said u201CThere is a difference between the document total and its components. [ORDR.DocTotal][line: 0] Iu201D Then i checked the sales order in SAP B1, I found the document total amount was not matched with the item line total amount. Actually the item line is quite simple, there is only one item line with qty 1. How comes the document total could be different with the amount from item line? I know the document total amount is a read-only field which is calculated automatically by SAP. This is really weird for us, we don't know how this happened.
Has anyone experienced similar situation like mine and how this happens?
Thanks,
Lan

I am having this same issue and I have additional information.
I am on ver. 8.8 PL 16.
Periodically (mulitiple times a week), when a Sales Order is created, the Doc Total amount is -zero- when there are clearly items that have a price associated with them. This causes an error when Adding the document. Sometimes, I can just change the quantity of one of the items, which forces the Doc Total to update. Most of the time this does not work, though. I end up having to restart the SAP client and then everything begins to work as it should.
This behavior is occuring on mulitple machines in our office.
Earlier in this thread, Rahul mentioned that they currency rounding was turned off and that this could be part of the problem. In fact, we were having issues with Currency Rounding and did turn it off not long ago. Rahul, can you explain better what you meant by "give the proper amount so that you can overcome the error..."
Randy Davis
Denver, CO
Edited by: Randy Davis on May 16, 2011 2:01 PM

AP Invoice Tax Amount Field not editable

Hi all,
The tax amount (LC) field on the AP Invoice field is not editable. What tax setup do I need to do to allow the tax amount to be editable. All of our sales transactions are tax exempt, however, we need to pay tax to some of our service vendors.
Thanks,
Jane

Hi,
It is Standard SAP B1 behavior, Tax Amount is editable in Purchase Documents and not editable in Sales Documents.
You have to frame the tax formula to match the amount correctly.
Do you want to enter in your own tax amount?
Did you check the form settings for Tax amount?
It is not a problem, its standard SAP B1 behaviour so you can click the link(Orange) button of row level Tax amount
and open the define tax amount distribution window. put the tax amount in the row level and update.
Thanks,
Madhan.

Tax amount is not coming in print preview of PO

Hello Experts,
I am faicng problem that Tax amount is coming in print preveiw only when i click on Taxes button in invoice tab.
If i dont click on Taxes button it is not coming even though it is present in the PO.
Please help me out in this issue.

Hi,
This might be because of the CODE ISSUE either in the PROGRAM OR SMARTFORM .
Please cehck the code , if you dont have access check with the ABAPer to debgg and identify the issue.
regards,
santosh

Non deductable Tax amount is not hitting in G/L at MIRO/GR

Hi
We have requirement as input 7.5% tax has to be loaded on material while GRN. and same has to hit on seperate G/L while MIRO.
The following settings has done and i am getting value in PO. But its not working in GR/MIRO..
1. Created the new condition type zusa with condition class D, calculation type %, Catag 1..accural key tick mark is selected..For my usa plant
2. created the acct key USA in OBCN as tax type-2, Non deductable, posting is 3..
3. in OB4O the G/l is maintained against the Accural key
4. In OBQ3 condition type is mainatined with acct key, accural key
5. Then in FTXP i maintained the tax code
6. FV11 against the condition 7.5% mainatined.
Finally while in PO tax is getting calculated, but GRN time , MIRO time there is no effect. system is taking the only Base price in Debit , credit at Inventory account. The tax calculated account is missing
Please susggest me

We have a Scenario thatu2026u2026. Tax Amount should Load on the Material but while capturing MIRO Tax Amount should post in Separate Accrual GL
Please find the below Accounting Entries.. which we need for the Businessu2026u2026.
Please suggest u2026u2026u2026
Please note the required accounting entry
GRN
Inventory DR    1100 (1000 Price + 100 Tax)
GR/IR     CR    1110
INVOICE
Vendor               Cr        1000
Tax Accrual        Cr         100
GR/IR                Dr        1100
my tax condition is getting calculated but it is not passing into the NAVS condition. can i have your id ..so that i can send u

Service Contracts Line and Header Tax amounts are not matching

Hi,
I am creating service contracts using API. Using below code i am applying price adjustments on the line. while using the below API Tax is calculated at line level and added for each line But the Tax filed on the header is not getting updated. I fwe go to front end and click on reprice then the Tax amount is added to the header(If the contract created with status 'Entered').
Please help me to fix this.
l_multi_line_tbl (0).ID := l_x_clev_rec.ID;
l_multi_line_tbl (0).price_list_id :=l_curr_price_list_id;
l_multi_line_tbl (0).lse_id := 46;
l_multi_line_tbl (0).line_pl_flag := 'Y';
l_x_return_status := NULL;
apps.oks_auth_util_pub.compute_price_multiple_line (
p_api_version
=> 1.0,
p_detail_tbl
=> l_multi_line_tbl,
x_return_status => l_x_return_status,
x_status_tbl
=> l_status_tbl);
Thanks,
Hari

not answered yet.

TDS TAX AMOUNT IS NOT MACHING WITH INVOICE WTAX AMOUNTu2019

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for