Schudling agreement with time dependent excise base value taking wrongly.

Sub: in migo excise base amount is not changing as per the scheduling agreement type LP ( time dependent ).
I have created the scheduling agreement type LP with time dependent.
I have maintained the price value in two validated period i.e
01/07/08 to 31/07/08 price is 100 rs.
01/08/08 to 31/08/08 price is 200 rs.
I have maintained the delivery schedule on
15/07/08 of quantity 1 nos.
When I am doing the goods receipts for the scheduling agreement on
Document date I am giving 15/07/08.
Posting date I am giving 15/07/08.
I am giving the posting date in the excise also 15/07/08.
After item ok.
When I will the excise base value it is taking 200 and also excise duty is also calculating on 200.
When I will post the document
The stock account and GR/IR account is taking 100 only
And excise duty is posting for rs: 200 only
Why the excise base value is not changing as per the validity period.
What setting I have to do the change the excise base value as per the validity date maintained in the time dependent .
regards
jrp

Hi
I was wondering in J1ID there is validity from date only no to date, Pls tell where you have maintained excise base amount based on from to period.
In J1ID if you maintain any new accesable value for the later date it will consider that.
Rgds
Srini

Similar Messages

Excise Base value calculated wrongly in GR

Dear experts,
When preparing Bought out goods receipt in migo,excise base value is coming wrongly(not as per PO) in sometimes.
If we come back from the screen without saving & then try again. That time the base value is calculating correctly.
This kind of situation is arising inconsistantly. Not regularly.
Please suggest to overcome this issue.
Regards
M.Sarathi

Hi,
When we capture excise invoice in MIGO, SAP will default the excise base value for the total PO quantity.
For eg. if the total PO qty is 100, and if the price is 10 INR, then during MIGO, system will show 100*10 = 1000 INR.
Even if you have posted a partial GR of say 10 nos. already, and you are now trying to post the balance 90 nos in MIGO,
then also, system will suggest the base value as 1000 INR (instead of 900 INR). This is a bug in the excise tab.
Only option is to overwrite the base value manually as per the GR qty.
Regards
Prabhu

Delivery cost in scheduling agreement having time dependent condition

Hi experts,
We have one peculiar requirement.
We have palnt at indonesia. We are doing import there from india.
Our requirement is as follows.
1. We should use scheduling agreement with time dependent conditions. Because we want to track the price changes and sometimes we want to retro pricing effect and revaluate it.
2. We want to add importers vat and import tax.
3. But those tax amount should not get added into inventory
4. During MIRO it should get accounted to vendor.
We could succeed this by removing "Time dependend condition" check in document type config.
But our client is definitely required the point no 1.
But when we activate time dependent condition check, during MIRO those conditions are not appearing. But if you remove that check, it is appearing in MIRO accounting.
Can any one suggest suitable solution?
Or SAP MIRO will not permit this scenario?
regards,
K.Sundaresan.

delivery cost will not work if u remove the tick Time dependend condition for SA
SAP MIRO will not permit this scenario
so u will have to decide what is more important to u and act accordingly
Solution will be u ask client what is mor imp for there company
as SAP will not support MIRO for deliver for time dependent condition
I had a talk with SAP on this and they have told that
SAP will not support MIRO for deliver for time dependent condition
AS in Case of imports in india we need to do MIRO before GR
hope this hel;sp

In MIGO wrong excise base value in import po

Hi,
We have done import PO applied the excise tax code EI, then we try to create MIGO except miro, but in MIGO in we changed the qty for example in PO 100qty and price 100 so total amount is 10000 so we get excise base value is 1000, but now we change the qty in mIGO as 10qty we get same excise base value as 1000 its not calculted.
please suggest me the any config
Thanks
Shital

Hi,
i have test in SAP note u suggested
Excise base defaulted incorrectly at the time of excise invoice capture in the imports scenario with ADC (additional duty of customs) being applicable. The excise duty values are picked from the commercial invoice captured but the excise base value is being calculated incorrectly.
but my scenario is different
Thanks
Shital

In import process,how excise base value is calculated in MIGO

Hi expert's,
In import process,how excise base value is calculated in MIGO,with what referance values get add to base value.
waiting for your valuable response,
Regards
V.raj

hi,
we Tried with your following reply ! but still not finding exact value in base value .
(MATERIAL PRICE* QTY IN MIGO * EXCHANGE RATE)
thanks & regards
V.Raj

Update Excise base value in MRP based and Non-MRP based billing

Hi Gurus,
We need to update Excise Base Value for Statistical Condition type. How to configure the same ?
Sl.No Pricing Condition Type      Active   Statistical           Passed to Accounting
1        MRP Price (Statistical)
2        Abatement (Statistical)
3       Surcharge (Active&Passed to Accounting)
4      Assessabel value (Statistical)
(No:4 This is the base for calculating Excise duties i.e Excise Base Value)
5       List Price (Statistical)
6       Customer Discount(Statistical)
7      Surcharge(Active&Passed to Accounting)
8      Net Price (Active&Passed to Accounting)
9      BED   (Active&Passed to Accounting)
10    ECess (Active&Passed to Accounting)
11   SECess (Active&Passed to Accounting)
12   Total collected from Customer(Statistical)
Issue: When there is MRP Price higher than the List Price, then the Cutomer will be charged on the basis of Net Price only, but the duties amount to be paid to the government on MRP Price. so in this case I can not calculate Excise Duties on the Actual Net Price condition which is active and passed on to accounting. And always the Excise duties to be calculated on Assessable value(no:4). But that condition type if I make activate then it will pass to accounting and also getting added to the Net Value(KOMP-NETWR). How to come out of this situation.(as per the customer requirement both MRP based materials and non-MRP based materials are also considered in the same sale order i.e with the same pricing procedure).
Becasue of this EXBAS is not getting updated in the J_1IEXCDTL.
Gurus, Share your valuable experiences and suggestions.
Thanks &Regards
Sreekanth
09611147585

Dear Lakshmipathi,
As per your suggestion, I have maintained Material Assessable Value and then also the duty values are calculating on the basis of Assessable value maintained in the Pricing Procedure. It is not taking the Material Assessable Value into consideration. And it is not getting updated the Excise Base Value.
In which case Material Assessable value will be taken into consideration?
How to update the Excise Base Value in J_1IEXCDTL tables?
Thanks&Regards
Sreekanth

Excise Base value is missing in ARE1

Hi All,
I am doing Export sale through u201CExports under claim of rebateu201D process, my customer currency is in USD (in CMR), and I have maintained condition record for price in USD, also I have maintained Exchange Rate in OB08.
In ARE1 I could not found u201CExcise baseu201D value (blank), if I maintain the condition record in INR, I could found Excise base value, what could be the reason?
Please suggest me that, how to bring the u201CExcise Baseu201D value in ARE1 if condition record for PR00 is in USD (CMR also maintained with USD)
Regards,
Ram

Hi,
Thank you for ur reply,
I have checked in Table (Excise Invoice Item) J_1IEXCDTL , I could not found "Excise Base" value (no value), but, as I have already mentioned that, if I maintain the condition record for PR00 in INR, then it's updating Excise Base. Is there any solution for this? (if condition record in USD)
For Excise Duties we are doing the round off, this is also affecting while converting the values with Exchange rate i.e.USD to INR. (Differance in values) how to avoide this?
Regards,
Ram

Excise base value ZERO in GR for STO

All SAP gurus,
I have created an STO in which my receiving plant is a depot. I have made an outbound delivery, billing and excise invoice from the supplying plant. Now when I am doing the GR through MIGO and entering the Excise Invoice no. it is showing the excise base value as zero while the BED ECS and SECESS value are flowing correctly from the EI. The system gives an error that the excise base is zero.
Can u pls suggest what can be the issue for the same.

Dear Ashish Dhawan,
We are facing a similar problem and would be highly grateful if you could let us know how did the value of material from STO document type UB flow to delivery type NL.
As we are not in position to figure out where excatly the settings needs to be done to make sure the base value along with conditions of STO appears in delivery. Since the delivery value is comming zero, we are not in position to make an excise invoice for the delivery for sending plant by J1IS.
regards,
chetan.

MIGO Excise base value to be convert to display mode

Hi Experts,
In MIGO item detail having Excise item tab.In this Base Value is coming in Edit Mode. I want to convert to Displaymode.Can anybody please explain me how to convert Edit mode to Displaymode.Please do needful.

Dear ,
At the time of MIGO, we are able to edit base amount.
We will get same amount in J1IEX.
If there is difference in amount excise invoice data then how will you handle it ?
Because of this reason excise base value is in edit mode.
Hope above will useful to you.
GOPAN.

Excise Base value and BED is wrong in MIGO while Depot

we are creating the PO for Depot, Tax code is NO ED setoff means
The BED is going to Inventory.
material is FERT material and Plant is DEPOT. we are using the conditions here are PB00some Z conditions and the BED is calculted on the PB00Z conitions ,
The BED and ECS and SEcess is shown in PO taxes tab correctly.
But when i go for MIGO "Create RG23D entry" the System will shown me the Double the BED and excise Base value is only taking the PB00 value, it is not taking the PB00+Z conditions why?
ECS and SEcess both are correct.
Here in PO the BED is calculted on PB00+Zconditions*....
In MIGO ....in Excise Item the BED % is showing me wrong values....It is not shwoing us the 14% correctly every time it is shown us different values
We are maintained the J1ID correctly for these........
After MIGO posting:
But the BED and remaing values are correctly shown in J1IDEPOTSTCOK1 tcode.
But when i saw the J_I1ECDHDR table the BED is Double and ECS and SECess both are correct
Why the BED is double and Excise base value wrong in MIGO...
Then I go for J1IG Here system is showing me Only BED i,e also wrong and it is not shwoing me ECS and SECess blank why?
Please kindly do the needful
Regards
sapman man

Please check ur setting of maintainexsice defaults.
BED condition type should be properly maintained.
regards,
Sujit

Excise Base value and BED is wrong in MIGO and J1IG

Hi,
we are creating the PO for Depot, Tax code is NO ED setoff means
The BED is going to Inventory.
material is FERT material and Plant is DEPOT. we are using the conditions here are PB00some Z conditions and the BED is calculted on the PB00Z conitions ,
The BED and ECS and SEcess is shown in PO taxes tab correctly.
But when i go for MIGO "Create RG23D entry" the System will shown me the Double the BED and excise Base value is only taking the PB00 value, it is not taking the PB00+Z conditions why?
ECS and SEcess both are correct.
Here in PO the BED is calculted on PB00+Zconditions*....
In MIGO ....in Excise Item the BED % is showing me wrong values....It is not shwoing us the 14% correctly every time it is shown us different values
We are maintained the J1ID correctly for these........
After MIGO posting:
But the BED and remaing values are correctly shown in J1IDEPOTSTCOK1 tcode.
But when i saw the J_I1ECDHDR table the BED is Double and ECS and SECess both are correct
Why the BED is double and Excise base value wrong in MIGO...
Then I go for J1IG Here system is showing me Only BED i,e also wrong and it is not shwoing me ECS and SECess blank why?
Please kindly do the needful
Regards
sapman man

Dear,
Use Z condition before PB00. The same should be statastical as PB00.
Check the excise default settings as well as,
Check the classify condition types
regards,
sujit

ARE-1 Excise Base Value and LOU

Hi Friends,
This problem is in Exports(LOU)
1) In ARE-1, Excise base value is zero.
BED,Ed Cess and Sec Higher Ed Cess are flowing.
I want to know whether this should have some value or it should be Zero.
2) For LOU, Whether we need to Create Bond?
Please help me
with regards

Hi Prashanth,
Thanks a lot...
I have checked this,
1035545 -Excise base amount is not updated in table J_1IEXCDTL
it is having the Solution as Apply code corrections.
Package name is SAPKH60009.
in my system it is SAPKH60008.
I think i have to upload this patch.
Once it done..i wll get back to u.
with regards

Updation of Excise Base Value in RG1 Register

Dear All,
I have maintained the Condition category as H in Condition Type. But still the Excise Base value is not getting updated in RG1 Register.
Please help me out with the solution.
Thanks
Tanushree

Hi Tanushree,
R u working in Ecc 6.0 or in ZYG?
To update the Excise Base value is in RG1 Register,wat u nid to do is assing Condition category as H.
Thanks
Kapil

0CS_Item with time-dependent hierarchy

Dear Experts,
we are discussing pros and cons for a time-dependent item catalog (characteristic 0CS_item with time dependent hierarchy in BW) within consolidation SEM BCS 4.0. Does anybody has experiences on this topic?
I am quite sure it will be a performance issue and it means additional reporting effort (e.g. using reference period/year in the report comparing different hierarchies).
I am not sure if there are any other risks so I it would be great if anybody has some hints.
Thanks in advance,
Birgit Laux
Message was edited by: Birgit Laux

Birgit,
Some other things to consider:
- frequency of changes to item hierarchy. Could lead to a lot of item hierarchies in BW over time.
- hierarchy validity date does not seem to be displayed when running web queries and thus makes it difficult for the user to select the correct hierarchy when executing the query. Still looking for a fix for this.
- greater complexity in overall design. Is it really necessary to achieve correct financial statement presentation?
Virtual cube performance is not great but you could implement the data mart which provides typical BW query performance.
I stayed away from setting the item as time dependent for these reasons.
Brian

In correct Excise Base Value in Import PO

Dear Experts ,
I have an query on the Excise Base value in Import PO .
The problem is I have made a Import Po , paid the customs duty through MIRO & now when I am doing J1IEX_C wrt to commercial invoice , its showing the Excise base value which is less then the value it should be , the tax amt like Excise BED, AED, Se cess & E cess is getting calculated correctly.
Can somebody tell me where the problem is.
Regards,
DGN 21
Edited by: dgn21 on Dec 3, 2010 6:24 AM

>
dgn21 wrote:
> Dear Jeyakanthan,
>
> As explained earlier after paying to the customs through MIRO, I am doing J1IEX_C, in this transaction, the excise duty is being calculated correctly but the Assessable shown is incorrect.
> I have following condition in schema:
> Gross Price (A):
> Insurance %(B)
> Basic Landing Charges (C):
> Assessable value: (A)(B)(C)
> Basic customs Duty (D)
> CVD (E)
> Ecess on CVD (F):
> S E Cess on CVD (G):
> And then other conditions
>
> Presently the system is calculating the Assessable value as (A) + (D) {i.e. Gross price +Basic Customs duty}, but it should be (A) + (B) +(C).
> Kindly tell me where I need to do the changes so I can get the correct Assessable value as desired.
>
>
> Thanks in advance
Check import pricing procedure calculations in M/08 ?

Schudling agreement with time dependent excise base value taking wrongly.

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for