Include Manager Lookup field on User Create & Modify form oim11g

Hi Experts,
I deleted the add manager field text box from the User modify and create page during customizations and published the sandbox. Now, as per the latest changes i needed to bring this field back. When I try to customize and add the content, I can see Manager field (In UserVO.xml) there. I added this field, but this field accepts long value not even text.
Actually i want to have a lookup type manager field that shows the managers User login when a manager is selected. I can see the functionality implemented in 10g instance. But dont know how to do here.
Please suggest!

Thanks all for your suggestion.
Our requirement, is we need to have a user defined field similar to how its there in "Organisation".
For example we need to create an user defined field like "Service Holding" which holds different services say like Service 1, Service 2, Service 3 etc.
Under each service there are multiple roles....
Eg:
Service 1 - Role 1, Role 2, Role 3
Service 2 - Role 4, Role 5
Service 3 - Role 6, Role 7, Role 8
Is there a way to store multi-valued attribute in OIM UDF? If so, pls. guide us
If its not possible we would need to create a Lookup field (something similar to Organization or Manager). User clicks on the button (lens button), which should invoke an API wherein he can select specific Roles and save in User. Eg. like Service 1 - Role 1#Service 2 # Role 5 and store in the backend database.
Is this possible. Pls. guide.
Regards,
Karan

Similar Messages

  • How to create a duplicate of the Manager ID field in the Create user menu

    Hi,
    I´m trying to create a duplicate of the Manager ID field in the Create user menu (with a different label). I need to add it a field with the same funtionality of the Manager ID field (search users with filters) but I don´t know how.
    I try to made a new adapter using the Thor.API.Operations.tcUserOperationsIntf but it don´t let me to map the input parameters.
    Also I try to assing an existent Lookup to a new UDF, but I couldn´t find the correct one.
    Did anybody do that??
    Thanks!

    Hi Kevin,
    First I created a a user defined field called USR_UDF_CONDUCTOR (Lookupfield type).
    Then I added the following lines to de FormMetaData.xml file:
    </Attribute name="-750" label="global.label.conductor" displayComponentType="LookupField" variantType="long" dataLength="50" map="USR_UDF_CONDUCTOR">
    <ValidValues lookupMethod="findUsersFiltered" operationClass="Thor.API.Operations.tcUserOperationsIntf" displayColumns="Users.User ID,Users.Last Name,Users.First Name" selectionColumn="Users.User ID"/>
    </Attribute>
    <AttributeReference editable="true" optional="true">-750</AttributeReference>
    When I try yo Create a new user, the OIM System Administrator returns a System Error.

  • How to create Lookup field in user form in OIM 11g - Urgent

    Hi Experts,
    How to create Lookup field in User Form - OIM 11g.
    Pls. provide your support on priority.
    Regards
    Karan

    Thanks all for your suggestion.
    Our requirement, is we need to have a user defined field similar to how its there in "Organisation".
    For example we need to create an user defined field like "Service Holding" which holds different services say like Service 1, Service 2, Service 3 etc.
    Under each service there are multiple roles....
    Eg:
    Service 1 - Role 1, Role 2, Role 3
    Service 2 - Role 4, Role 5
    Service 3 - Role 6, Role 7, Role 8
    Is there a way to store multi-valued attribute in OIM UDF? If so, pls. guide us
    If its not possible we would need to create a Lookup field (something similar to Organization or Manager). User clicks on the button (lens button), which should invoke an API wherein he can select specific Roles and save in User. Eg. like Service 1 - Role 1#Service 2 # Role 5 and store in the backend database.
    Is this possible. Pls. guide.
    Regards,
    Karan

  • Can another user create a form on our account?

    Can another user create a form on our account without us giving them our password?

    Yes, any user can create the form in Formscentral, provided you don't share the password.
    Regards,
    Anoop

  • Reader-enabled form from Acrobat is retaining interactive form fields when user saves the form

    This is an issue that has only recently come up. In the past it was not a problem to take a pdf, add interactive form fields to it in LiveCycle, then open the form in Acrobat and enable usage rights for Reader users.
    This allowed Reader users to fill out the form and save the results. With the most recent versions of Acrobat and Reader the user saves the form and the data AND the interactive form fields are saved in the resulting file - meaning that the data is still there to be changed. Clearly not what we want and not what Acrobat and Reader were doing previously.
    The form does properly display "You can save data typed in this form" when opened in Reader.
    I have got no response to this issue in the LiveCycle forum, and nothing shows up in a search. I would very much like to fix this, as it is affecting our entire library of pdf forms.

    In most instances the form is linked on the website, so the original form will cannot be overwritten.
    In some cases we have to supply an interactive pdf for a department that they will then distribute by email to various groups who are expected to fill the form out on submit on an ongoing basis. That is what I was meaning by the user filling out the form, printing it, and then being prompted to save changes.
    The bigger issue is that most of our users expect to take a form hosted on the website, fill it out, and then save a pdf copy of their responses for reference. The reference copy is retaining the interactive fields rather than printing as a static pdf.
    If I could force the action of printing as a pdf (rather than saving as a pdf) on submission I think that would solve the issue. The script for most of the forms in the library is xfa.host.print(1, "0", (xfa.host.numPages -1).toString(), 0, 0, 0, 0, 0); and I am not aware of a way to force the print to only be to the pdf print driver.

  • font color=red Create/Modify forms and triggers through C++ using OPEN API

    <font color=red>
    Dear brothers/sisters<font color=darkblue>
    <br><br>
    Please help us to find the linking problem.
    <br>
    We have to add PRE-FORM trigger to many FMBies. We have thousants of FMBies. So opening one by one is difficult. For this we are using OPEN API and BORLAND C++. We have coppied all header files from D:\orant\FORMS60\API.
    But there is a link error. Here is the snippet.
    <br>
    <font color=red>
    <br>#include <stdio.h>
    <br>#include <stdlib.h>
    <br>#include <malloc.h>
    <br>#include <d2fctx.h> /* Forms API context */
    <br>#include <d2ffmd.h> /* Form module header file */
    <br>int main (int argc, char *argv[])
    <br>{
    <br>d2fctxa ctx_attr;
    <br>d2fctx *ctx;
    <br>d2ffmd *form;
    <br>text *form_name;
    <br>/* Check arguments */
    <br>if ( argc != 2 )
    <br>{
    <br>fprintf(stderr, "USAGE: %s <filename>\n", argv[0]);
    <br>exit(1);
    <br>}
    <br>/* Create Forms API context */
    <br>ctx_attr.mask_d2fctxa = (ub4)0;
    <br>if ( d2fctxcr_Create(&ctx, &ctx_attr) != D2FS_SUCCESS )
    <br>{
    <br>fprintf(stderr, "Error creating Forms API context\n");
    <br>exit(1);
    <br>}
    <br>/* Load the form module into memory */
    <br>if ( d2ffmdld_Load(ctx, &form, argv[1], FALSE) != D2FS_SUCCESS )
    <br>{
    <br>fprintf(stderr, "Failed to load form module: %s\n", argv[1]);
    <br>exit(1);
    <br>}
    <br>/* Get the name of the form module */
    <br>if ( d2ffmdg_name(ctx, form, &form_name) != D2FS_SUCCESS )
    <br>{
    <br>fprintf(stderr, "Error getting the name of the form module\n");
    <br>}
    <br>else
    <br>{
    <br>/* Print the name of the form, then free it */
    <br>printf ("The name of the form is %s\n", form_name);
    <br>free(form_name);
    <br>}
    <br>/* Destroy the in-memory form */
    <br>if ( d2ffmdde_Destroy(ctx, form) != D2FS_SUCCESS )
    <br>{
    <br>fprintf(stderr, "Error destroying form module\n");
    <br>}
    <br>/* Close the API and destroy context */
    <br>d2fctxde_Destroy(ctx);
    <br>return 0;
    <br>}
    <br>
    <font color=darkblue>
    <br>
    The compilation is success. But there is a link error. Please help us to find the problem.
    <br><br>
    Here is the error Message.
    <br>
    <font color=red>
    <br>Borland C++ 5.5.1 for Win32 Copyright (c) 1993, 2000 Borland
    <br>FIRST.CPP:
    <br>Turbo Incremental Link 5.00 Copyright (c) 1997, 2000 Borland
    <br>Error: Unresolved external '_d2fctxcr_Create' referenced from D:\API\FIRST.OBJ
    <br>Error: Unresolved external '_d2ffmdld_Load' referenced from D:\API\FIRST.OBJ
    <br>Error: Unresolved external '_d2ffmdgt_GetTextProp' referenced from D:\API\FIRST.OBJ
    <br>Error: Unresolved external '_d2fctxde_Destroy' referenced from D:\API\FIRST.OBJ
    <br><br>
    <font color=darkblue size=4>Could you please help us.......<br>

    <font color=red>
    Dear brothers/sisters<font color=darkblue>
    <br><br>
    Please help us to find the linking problem.
    <br>
    We have to add PRE-FORM trigger to many FMBies. We have thousants of FMBies. So opening one by one is difficult. For this we are using OPEN API and BORLAND C++. We have coppied all header files from D:\orant\FORMS60\API.
    But there is a link error. Here is the snippet.
    <br>
    <font color=red>
    <br>#include <stdio.h>
    <br>#include <stdlib.h>
    <br>#include <malloc.h>
    <br>#include <d2fctx.h> /* Forms API context */
    <br>#include <d2ffmd.h> /* Form module header file */
    <br>int main (int argc, char *argv[])
    <br>{
    <br>d2fctxa ctx_attr;
    <br>d2fctx *ctx;
    <br>d2ffmd *form;
    <br>text *form_name;
    <br>/* Check arguments */
    <br>if ( argc != 2 )
    <br>{
    <br>fprintf(stderr, "USAGE: %s <filename>\n", argv[0]);
    <br>exit(1);
    <br>}
    <br>/* Create Forms API context */
    <br>ctx_attr.mask_d2fctxa = (ub4)0;
    <br>if ( d2fctxcr_Create(&ctx, &ctx_attr) != D2FS_SUCCESS )
    <br>{
    <br>fprintf(stderr, "Error creating Forms API context\n");
    <br>exit(1);
    <br>}
    <br>/* Load the form module into memory */
    <br>if ( d2ffmdld_Load(ctx, &form, argv[1], FALSE) != D2FS_SUCCESS )
    <br>{
    <br>fprintf(stderr, "Failed to load form module: %s\n", argv[1]);
    <br>exit(1);
    <br>}
    <br>/* Get the name of the form module */
    <br>if ( d2ffmdg_name(ctx, form, &form_name) != D2FS_SUCCESS )
    <br>{
    <br>fprintf(stderr, "Error getting the name of the form module\n");
    <br>}
    <br>else
    <br>{
    <br>/* Print the name of the form, then free it */
    <br>printf ("The name of the form is %s\n", form_name);
    <br>free(form_name);
    <br>}
    <br>/* Destroy the in-memory form */
    <br>if ( d2ffmdde_Destroy(ctx, form) != D2FS_SUCCESS )
    <br>{
    <br>fprintf(stderr, "Error destroying form module\n");
    <br>}
    <br>/* Close the API and destroy context */
    <br>d2fctxde_Destroy(ctx);
    <br>return 0;
    <br>}
    <br>
    <font color=darkblue>
    <br>
    The compilation is success. But there is a link error. Please help us to find the problem.
    <br><br>
    Here is the error Message.
    <br>
    <font color=red>
    <br>Borland C++ 5.5.1 for Win32 Copyright (c) 1993, 2000 Borland
    <br>FIRST.CPP:
    <br>Turbo Incremental Link 5.00 Copyright (c) 1997, 2000 Borland
    <br>Error: Unresolved external '_d2fctxcr_Create' referenced from D:\API\FIRST.OBJ
    <br>Error: Unresolved external '_d2ffmdld_Load' referenced from D:\API\FIRST.OBJ
    <br>Error: Unresolved external '_d2ffmdgt_GetTextProp' referenced from D:\API\FIRST.OBJ
    <br>Error: Unresolved external '_d2fctxde_Destroy' referenced from D:\API\FIRST.OBJ
    <br><br>
    <font color=darkblue size=4>Could you please help us.......<br>

  • Updating values dynamically in an user attribute which is lookup field

    Hi All,
    Can I have a pre process event handler to update the values in the lookup field on my create user page? I have two user attributes - one is the default organization and the other is a user created Country attribute. Both of these are Lookup fields. I want to update the country lookup field by checking what is selected in the organization lookup field. Is this possible in OIM?
    Not sure if pre process event handler is the way to go but this is what I want to achieve. Can anybody guide me regarding the same?
    Thanks,
    $id

    OK, here's my shot at a walkthrough... let me know if I missed any steps.
    1. From your original post, you are using two lookup fields. I'm use a base VM for testing, so I needed to create two. I went with City and State (I know they are OOB, but this is just an example).
    - Created Lookup.Custom.City and Lookup.Custom.State Samples:
    Lookup.Custom.City
    Code Key-Decode
    Miami-Florida
    Orlando-Florida
    New Orleans-Louisiana
    Lookup.Custom.State
    Code Key-Decode
    Florida-Florida
    Lousiana-Louisiana
    - Creating Custom UDF Attributes: Advanced->User Configuration->Actions->User Attributes (LOV's)
    -- Office City and Office State
    2. Use weblogicExportMetadata.sh to export /metadata/iam-features-requestactions/model-data/CreateUserDataSet.xml
    3. Edit CreateUserDataSet.xml to add:
    <AttributeReference name="Office State" attr-ref="Office State" available-in-bulk="false" type="String" length="20" widget="lookup" lookup-code="Lookup.Custom.State" required="false" mls="false"/>
    <AttributeReference name="Office City" attr-ref="Office City" type="String" length="30" widget="lookup-query" available-in-bulk="false">
    <lookupQuery lookup-query="select City.LKV_ENCODED as City from (Select LKV_ENCODED , LKV_DECODED  from LKU LKU, LKV LKV where lku_type_String_key = 'Lookup.Custom.City' and lku.lku_key = lkv.lku_key) City, (Select LKV_ENCODED, LKV_DECODED from LKU LKU, LKV LKV where lku_type_String_key = 'Lookup.Custom.State' and lku.lku_key = lkv.lku_key and lkv_decoded='$Form Data.Office State') State where State.LKV_ENCODED = City.LKV_DECODED order by City" display-field="City" save-field="City"/>
    </AttributeReference>4. Use weblogicImportMetadata.sh to import CreateUserDataSet.xml
    5. Run ./PurgeCache ALL (same directory)
    6. Go to request - create user (this example is for request based provisioning)
    7. If all went ok, when you select State, let's say Florida, then when you then click on city lookup, you will only see Orlando and Miami. If you toggle the state to Louisiana, you'll need to click search again on city and New Orleans should be the only one that comes up.

  • Infopath form crashes when selecting second lookup field

    Hi there,
    I suffer from a strange behaviour in sharepoint 2010. I created an infopath form, which (besides lots of other fields) includes two lookup fields (1 and 2) which points to the same data list. Moreover there's a third lookup field (field 3) which also points
    to that data and is meant to be the filter for cascading dropdown. When I select a value from field 3, the data in field 1 and 2 is filtered according to the selected value. When I select a value in field 1 everything is allright. Then the selected entry from
    field 2 is removed from data of field 3 using data filter. When I select a value from field 3 the form crashes (which means the rendering crashes). All fields disappear and oly the red stars of required fields are shown. When I click the cancel button, all
    fields appear again ald the value is selected. Also when I move around the form panel, the fields are shown again. This problem only appears in IE. When I tried this in Google Chrome, everything works just fine. Also in the InfoPath preview it works. I am
    using IE 11.
    Thanks for your help
    Cheers,
    Magnus 

    Hi Magnus,
    As this issue only appears in IE, it seems to be a client issue.
    In general, for this issue, we do that: 
    Add the site into IE Trusted Sites.
    Add the site into Compatibility View.
    Whether you try to use IE 10 mode in IE 11. If not, pelase have a try.
    Please test on other machines, compare the result.
    Please use IE 10 to test, compare the result.
    Best Regards,
    Wendy
    Wendy Li
    TechNet Community Support

  • Send email when a record is created/modified in IT0744 and IT0487

    Hi ABAP Experts,
    Good day! I'm quite new to ABAP Dev and I have a requirement like this:
    1. When a user created/modified a record in IT0744/IT0487, an automatic email notification will be sent to the desired  recipient.
    The requirement is to send an email with a sample template like this:
    Notification Trigger:     If Blacklist Status is = u2018Blacklistedu2019 and Reason is u2018Failure to turn up on work start dateu2019.
    Subject     Notification: Failure to turn up on work start date.
    Attachment     Yes / No
    Notification Message Layout Format
    [Name of New Hire] u2013 [NRIC of New Hire] failed to report for work on [Hire Date] as a [Position Title] at [Div/Branch].
    Kindly provide if possible some steps that will be easy to follow; a sample program will be helpful.
    Thanks a lot!
    Regards,
    jeff

    Hi,
    In the exit itself you can use this function module SO_DOCUMENT_SEND_API1 to send mail to desired user.
    Other way out is you can create Work flow and can use create and modify event for triggering the work flow.
    Hope this helps.
    Regards
    Bikas

  • How to do the new created field in User Attributes, show in Manager GTC

    Hello Guys,
    I have a Connector GTC working perfectly. Now I created a new field in User Attributes and I need make this field appear in "Modify Connector Configuration" of "Manage Generic Connector" without having to create a new Connector.
    If I create a new Connector this field is showed normally, but this connector has a lot of mapping between the existing fields, I need only that a new field is displayed.
    How to I do this?
    Thanks

    Not sure what version of OIM you are using but check Bug: 12812650
    -Bikash

  • How to modify a lookup field-type to use checkbox instead of radiobutton?

    How to modify a lookup field-type to use checkbox instead of radiobutton?
    I would like to modify the behavior for the lookup field.
    Normally you get a screen where it is possible to search through a lookup. The items resulted from the search are listed as radiobutton items. Therefore you can select only one at the time to be added.
    Is it possible to have the items to be listed as checkbox instead? So that you can check multiple items and therefore be able to add multiple items at the time?
    For example:
    To add the user to 10 different groups on MS-AD.
    It is desired to have the ability to check multiple groups to be added instead only one at the time.
    My client would like to use this feature in many other situations.

    Displaying will not be a big deal but with that you have to customize the action class and its working as well.

  • How to get the user created when I prepare for the BD Identity Manager

    Hi I have a query, I need to get a backup database Identity Manager 9.1, I have a problem I do not remember user created to perform the backup, how can you know that I created when I made the installation of Identity Manager, or how can I find

    Hi,
    You can do this trick:
    1) Go to "Deployment Manager" in the Web Console, and open the EXPORT applet
    2) Export the User Defined Fields from the USR form. You don't need any dependence for this.
    3) Open the generated XML with a text editor.
    3) Search for the <SDK_SCHEMA> tag
    This tag contains the OIM schema name, wich shoud be your OIM database user.
    Hope it helps,

  • After 10.1.2 upgrade, Create/Modify User/Group requires re-authentication

    I have 3 systems - 2 were 9.x (AS10g R1) upgraded to 10.x (AS10g R2), 1 was installed as 10.x. On the two upgraded systems, after a Portal user logs in (with administration privileges), navigates to the "Administration" tab and clicks either the "Create New User", "Modify User", "Create New Group" or "Modify Group" links, they are prompted for a username and password again. On the system installed with 10.x, this does not happen. Submitted iTar was unresolved. Has anyone seen this before?
    Thanks in advance.

    Please read this whole message before doing anything.
    This procedure is a diagnostic test. It’s unlikely to solve your problem. Don’t be disappointed when you find that nothing has changed after you complete it.
    The purpose of the test is to determine whether the problem is caused by third-party software that loads automatically at startup or login, by a peripheral device, by a font conflict, or by corruption of the file system or of certain system caches.
    Disconnect all wired peripherals except those needed for the test, and remove all aftermarket expansion cards, if applicable. Start up in safe mode and log in to the account with the problem. You must hold down the shift key twice: once when you boot, and again when you log in.
    Note: If FileVault is enabled, or if a firmware password is set, or if the boot volume is a Fusion Drive or a software RAID, you can’t do this. Ask for further instructions.
    Safe mode is much slower to boot and run than normal, with limited graphics performance, and some things won’t work at all, including sound output and Wi-Fi on certain models. The next normal boot may also be somewhat slow.
    The login screen appears even if you usually login automatically. You must know your login password in order to log in. If you’ve forgotten the password, you will need to reset it before you begin.
    Test while in safe mode. Same problem?
    After testing, reboot as usual (not in safe mode) and verify that you still have the problem. Post the results of the test.

  • Making Manager field in user details tab mandatory in GRC 10

    While raising the GRC Access request, I would like to make the Manager field madatory to be filled.  What is happening now,, the requestor is raising the request without manager field filled, and its not able to find the manager as per the route and the request get cancelled.
    Is there a option to modify the field to make it mandatory by red asterik as its there for other fields in user details tab.
    Response is appreciated.

    Hi ,
    Please Navigate to IMG > Governance, Risk and Compliance >  Access Control > User Provisioning > Maintain End User Personalization.
    There are four columns of fields that can be maintained:
    -  Default value
    - Mandatory
    - Editable
    - Visible
    By Choosing YES or NO from the dropdown list under the Mandatory field, any field on the Access Request screen can be made mandatory.
    Hope this helps.
    Vikas

  • We now use Acrobat xi for special active forms we created that include certifications and signature fields, some of the forms are programmed to create other forms, will we have a problem upgrading to DC

    We now use Acrobat xi for special active forms we created that include certifications and signature fields, some of the forms are programmed to create other forms, will we have a problem upgrading to DC
    Our users use a form template to create other adobe forms with calculated fields, signature fields (using digital signatures)
    , and buttons. Will we be able to continue developing these forms if we upgrade to Acrobat DC?

    Hi Alex ,
    In general ,you would not have any issues and problems moving to Acrobat DC .It has a different user interface and with more enhanced features .
    You would be able to develop the kind of forms you are referring to .
    You could refer to the following document to get more information about Acrobat DC .
    FAQ | Adobe Acrobat DC
    If in case you are referring to any particular issue or problem or if you face any regarding Acrobat DC ,we are always here to help you with that .
    Please feel free to write us back .
    Regards
    Sukrit Dhingra

Maybe you are looking for