Inconsistency between capacity online check and CM01/CM02

Hi All,
Please help.
During production order creation (change) capacity availability check online results differ from results in CM01/CM02.
I've already used capacity basic load report RCCYLOAD and created basic load.
For the evaluation (CM01/02) i use overall profile SAPSFC010 (work center basic load). For capacity availability check online- profile recommended by SAP- SAPSFCG013 (SFC:Capacity availability check >= 3.0D).
Don't know what could it be.
Thanks,
Regards, Andrey

Error found in Capacity leveling profile.

Similar Messages

Inconsistency between a document field and the prof. segment number

Hi,
While processing an invoice in one company code for vendor# XXX with the PO# AAAA line# 10, it is showing below error message while posting. Please advise on the below error or fix the issue to post the invoice in to SAP. The using screen T-code is miro.
Inconsistency between a document field and the prof. segment number
*Message no. KE396
*Diagnosis
A line item was assigned to a profitability segment (number 0008629207) which has the value 0000101000 for characteristic Profit Center. The original document (FI document, sales order, internal order, etc.), however, contains 0000102020 in this field. It is therefore inconsistent with the profitability segment found.
System response
The characteristics in Profitability Analysis (CO-PA) must have the same characteristic values as the original document. For example, you cannot assign a sales order to a different customer or product than the one contained in the original sales order. If you wish to fill the characteristics with different contents, you must change the original fields.
Procedure
Enter the correct characteristic values on the CO-PA assignment screen. The system will automatically assign a corresponding profitability segment number. If it is not possible to enter values in some of these fields, delete the entire assignment to a profitability segment number and then enter it again.
As a rule, you should first enter the fields in the original sender document and then make the assignment to a profitability segment.
What should I do for the above pl ?
Regards
Murali

Hi,
While doing PGR at VL32N, we are facing this error. Can someone assist.
Regards,
Aruna

Diff between Item Amount Check and Stochastic Block

Hi,
what's the diff between Item Amount Check and Stochastic Block in LIV??

Item Amount Check
The system calculates the sum of the value invoiced so far for the
order item and the value of the current invoice and compares it with
the value limit of the purchase order. It then compares the
difference with the upper percentage and absolute tolerances
defined.
Stochastic Block
You can block all invoices to check them again through Stochastic block automatically. If the stochastic block is active and you post an invoice that is not subject to any other blocking reason, it can be selected for blocking.
Please make a note that- A stochastic block is not set at item level, but for the whole invoice. If a stochastic block is set when you post the invoice, the system automatically sets an R in the field Payment block in the document header data; there is no blocking indicator in the individual items.
In Customizing for Invoice Verification, you can define:
-If stochastic blocking is active
-The degree of probability of a block. You set a threshold value and a percentage for this.
If you enter a threshold value of zero and a percentage of 99.9%, all invoices would then be blocked automatically.

Inconsistency between get-childitem -include and -exclude parameters

Hi,
Powershell 2.0
Does anyone else consider this a minor design bug in the Get-ChildItem command?
# create dummy files
"a","b","c" | % {$null | out-file "c:\temp\$_.txt"}
# this "fails", returns nothing
get-childitem c:\temp -include a*,b*
# this "works", returns desired files
get-childitem c:\temp\* -include a*,b*
# this "works", excludes undesired files
get-childitem c:\temp -exclude a*,b*
# this "fails", excludes undesired files BUT RECURSES sub-directories
get-childitem c:\temp\* -exclude a*,b*
I'm writing a wrapper script around the GCI cmdlet, but the inconsistency between the two parameters is problematic. My end user will surely just type a path for the path parameter, then wonder why -include returned nothing. I can't unconditionally
add an asterisk to the path parameter, since that messes up the exclude output.
I'm just wondering why Microsoft didn't make the parameter interaction consistent???
# includes desired files in the specified path
get-childitem -path c:\temp -include a*,b*
# excludes undesired files in the specified path
get-childitem -path c:\temp -exclude a*,b*
# combine both options
get-childitem -path c:\temp -include a*,b* -exclude *.log,*.tmp
# same as above, the asterisk doesn't matter
get-childitem -path c:\temp\* -include a*,b*
get-childitem -path c:\temp\* -exclude a*,b*
get-childitem -path c:\temp\* -include a*,b* -exclude *.log,*.tmp
# same as above, but explicitly recurse if that's what you want
get-childitem -path c:\temp\* -include a*,b* -recurse
get-childitem -path c:\temp\* -exclude a*,b* -recurse
get-childitem -path c:\temp\* -include a*,b* -exclude *.log,*tmp -recurse
If I execute the "naked" get-childitem command, the asterisk doesn't matter...
# same results
get-childitem c:\temp
get-chileitem c:\temp\*
If this isn't considered a bug, can you explain why the inconsistency between the two parameters when combined with the -path parameter?
Thanks,
Scott

The Get-ChildItem cmdlet syntax is horrific for advanced use. It's not a bug in the classic sense, so you shouldn't call it that. However, feel free to call it awful, ugly, disastrous, or any other deprecatory adjective you like - it really is
nasty.
Get-ChildItem's unusual behavior is rooted in one of the more 'intense' dialogues between developers and users in the beta period. Here's how I recall it working out; some details are a bit fuzzy for me at this point.
Get-ChildItem's original design was as a tool for enumerating items in a namespace -
similar to but not equivalent to dir and
ls. The syntax and usage was going to conform to standard PowerShell (Monad at the time) guidelines.
In a nutshell, what this means is that the Path parameter would have truly just meant Path - it would not have been usable as a combination path specification and result filter, which it is now. In other words
(1) dir c:\temp
means you wanted to return children of the container c:\temp
(2) dir c:\temp\*
means you wanted to return children of all containers inside
c:\temp. With (2), you would never get c:\tmp\a.txt returned, since a.txt is not a container.
There are reasons that this was a good idea. The parameter names and filtering behavior was consistent with the evolving PowerShell design standards, and best of all the tool would be straightforward to stub in for use by namespace
providers consistently.
However, this produced a lot of heated discussion. A rational, orthogonal tool would not allow the convenience we get with the dir command for doing things like this:
(3) dir c:\tmp\a*.txt
Possibly more important was the "crash" factor. It's so instinctive for admins to do things like (3) that our fingers do the typing when we list directories, and the instant failure or worse, weird, dissonant output we would get with a more pure Path
parameter is exactly like slamming into a brick wall.
At this point, I get a little fuzzy about the details, but I believe the Get-ChildItem syntax was settled on as a compromise that wouldn't derail people expecting files when they do (3), but would still allow more complex use. I think that this
is done essentially by treating all files as though they are containers for themselves. This saves a lot of pain in basic use, but introduces other pain for advanced use.
This may shed some light on why the tool is a bit twisted, but it doesn't do a lot to help with your particular wrapping problem. You'll almost certainly need to do some more complicated things in attempting to wrap up Get-ChildItem. Can you describe some
details of what your intent is with the wrapper? What kind of searches by what kind of users, maybe? With those details, it's likely people can point out some specific approaches that can give more consistent results.

Difference in credit between the online page and S...

Hello
There seems to be some discrepancy between my online credit balance, and what shows up on the header of my Skype. I added the credit yesterday night, the web page got updated automatically, but the desktop Skype is still lacking. On my Android on the other hand, the credit shows up normally. I am confused because, if anything, I would expect the opposite. Is there any way I can shake my desktop into compliance?
Sorry if this is the wrong place to post this.

RollingInTheDee wrote:
Is there any way I can shake my desktop into compliance?
Hello
Power down your desktop, wait for 5 minutes and reboot. This should force the client to update.
TIME ZONE - US EASTERN. LOCATION - PHILADELPHIA, PA, USA.
I recommend that you always run the latest Skype version: Windows & Mac
If my advice helped to fix your issue please mark it as a solution to help others.
Please note that I generally don't respond to unsolicited Private Messages. Thank you.

System error: Inconsistency between Credit/debit indicator and amounts

Hi All,
I am getting this error as while trying to release a billing document to accounting. The Message no. is F5693
Please help!
Thanks,
Anupriya

Dear Kaushik,
System is triggering this error from following includes.
LFACIF4T
LFACIF4Z
IF ACCCR_FI-WRBTR LT 0
OR ACCCR_FI-SKFBT LT 0
OR ACCCR_FI-BUALT LT 0
OR ACCCR_FI-WSKTO LT 0
OR ACCCR_FI-KZBTR LT 0
OR ACCCR_FI-QSFBT LT 0
OR ACCCR_FI-QSSHB LT 0
OR ACCCR_FI-WMWST LT 0
OR ACCCR_FI-GBETR LT 0.
check whether any of the above field value is less than 0.
Thanks & Regards,
Hegal K Charles

There is an inconsistency between the authentication mode of target web application and the source web application after migrating to claims

I've had my farm upgraded from SP2010 to SP2013 for over 6 months now and all is well, however, I was refreshing my staging environment from production and I noticed that one of the databases still shows these errors when I run test-spcontentdatabase:
Category : Configuration
Error : False
UpgradeBlocking : False
Message : The [SharePoint Web App] web application is configured with claims authentication mode however the content database you are trying to attach is intended to be used against
a windows classic authentication mode.
Remedy : There is an inconsistency between the authentication mode of target web application and the source web application. Ensure that the authentication mode setting in upgraded web application is the
same as what you had in previous SharePoint 2010 web application. Refer to the link "http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=236865" for more information.
This doesn't make sense considering I converted the production web application to claims during the upgrade and then verified all sites were working with claims logins. I also verified that existing AD user identities were converted to claims by checking out
the database tables. Yet test-spcontentdatabase still thinks there is a mismatch here.
My farm is SP1 and no further CUs. The point of this particular refresh is so I can update to the November CUs in my test farm. Anyone else see this? Seems like it's a bug/safe to ignore because my stuff is working.
Thanks,
Aaron

See:
http://thesharepointfarm.com/2014/11/test-spcontentdatabase-classic-to-claims-conversion/
Trevor Seward
Follow or contact me at...
&nbsp&nbsp
This post is my own opinion and does not necessarily reflect the opinion or view of Microsoft, its employees, or other MVPs.

Customise table inconsistency between ABAP Dictionary and the databas

Hi all,
I have encountered a problem where by, I was not able to activate a table due to inconsistency between ABAP Dictionary and the database.
After I run the SE14--> Check Database object. It has show that there is a missing Unique Index(Primary Index) at the Database Level, but at ABAP Dictionary it is there.
I have try to recreate the primary index at the Database level, but failed. Because one of the primary key field is been dropped from this table.
So now, may I know how can I still make this table Active again?
Is it save to folllow the following solution that I found on internet?
Syntax error in SDCC, table inconsistency between ABAP Dictionary and the database, transport error 8 during the generation of ABAP Dictionary. When you call Transaction SDCC, a termination occurs due to a putative syntax error because a table is not known or active. When you check this with the ABAP dictionary (SE11), you notice, that the table is active or inactive, however it is not possible to activate it. The activation might terminate with the error message 'Inconsistency between ABAP Dictionary and database'. A check of the affected object also delivers this error.
Solution
Proceed as follows:
Log on as user DDIC
Call Transaction SE14
Enter the affected table name and
select EDIT
In the following screen, choose Table -> Reconstruct
Confirm the execution
Call Transaction SE11
Enter the affected table name
Display
Activate
Thanks.
CK

I managed to solved this by
Solution
Proceed as follows:
Log on as user DDIC
Call Transaction SE14
Enter the affected table name and
select EDIT
In the following screen, choose Table -> Reconstruct
Confirm the execution
Call Transaction SE11
Enter the affected table name
Display
Activate
Thanks.
CK

Inconsistency between tbtco and tbtcs

Hello guys,
we have a big problem after our HWU upgrade.
We have copied the content of tbtco into a new table tbtco_copy before the upgrade to save all the job entries.
After this we have deleted the contant of tbtco. So we had no scheduled jobs for the HWU
After the HWU we have copied back the content of tbtco_copy into tbtco.
But now we have a inconsistency between tbtco and tbtcs. This means that all planed and released jobs are not starting (delay goes up).
How we can start this jobs << Removed >>
Br
Christian
Edited by: Rob Burbank on Apr 19, 2009 4:23 PM

USer TR: SM65

Check concordance between the package database and the filesystem

Hello, I'd like to write this down :
To list the packages installed in the database, I use
pacman -Qsq
-Q because it's a query on the local database, s to search and q for quiet.
If you would like to list the files installed by pacman on your computer, you would do
pacman -Qqs | xargs pacman -Ql | cut -f2 -d' '
and if you would to count them you could write
pacman -Qqs|xargs pacman -Ql|wc -l
If you'd want to know if the files actually exist, and reporting for errors, you could run
for a_package in $(pacman -Qqs) ; do
for a_file in $( pacman -Ql ${a_package}|cut -d' ' -f2 ) ; do
if [ ! -e ${a_file} ]; then
echo package ${a_package} is broken: file ${a_file} is missing. ;
# use the following if you would wish to remove the broken package.
# sudo pacman -R ${a_package} ;
# break
fi ;
done ;
done
The if test does check if the file, whatever its kind (folder, symbolic link, etc), does actually exist on your computer, and report a problem if the file is missing. In a generality purpose, I used test -e. You could look at the test manpage, to look for more elaborate examples. You can imagine report what kind of file is missing, or run a check of the permissions and owner which file has in the file system.
So, I use this because I recently messed up my system with AUR build that came along with the database, but was hard to debug. I don't know how to distinguish between an AUR package and an official package, so this solution came out to clean my database.
I hope I could post more code snippets here if you find it useful. See you.
Last edited by dkremer (2011-08-12 13:05:26)

Allan wrote:pacman -Qk ?
yes. It does the job as well. Just a question: can you use the output of this command to remove the packages which are broken ?
EDIT: actually pacman -Qqk gives the name of broken packages. My apologies.
Last edited by dkremer (2011-08-14 13:20:23)

Trying to Hot Sync Visor Pro with Windows 7 (64 bit OS) - getting error: "The connection between your handheld computer and the destktop could not be established. Please check your setup and try again."

Hi.
I read the posting regarding the options on Hotsyncing for Windows 7; however, I have some questions as I have a 64-bit system.
I have a Visor Pro that I'm trying to Sync up with my new laptop which is running Windows 7.
Steps I have taken:
* installed the Visor Palm Desktop 3.0.1 that came with the Visor (which the installation went well)
* The issue arises when I push the "Sync" button on the cradle and the following error message appears "The connection between your handheld computer and the destktop could not be established. Please check your setup and try again."
Since I have a 64-bit OS it appears that I have 2 options: 1) bluetooth or 2) Infrared.
I have to admit I don't know know how to do either of these (how can I tell if this Handspring Visor Pro has bluetooth (which I don't it does)?).
Then how about the Infrared option? I see on the PDA it has a red area that one can "beam" info. Is this the same as Infrared or my 2nd option?
I love my Visor and want to continue using it, but need to backup the valuable info!
Any help with this would be greatly appreciated!
THANKS!!!!!
Post relates to: Visor Pro

Hello lwalbring and welcome to the Palm forums.
Your Visor, as you suspect, does not have Bluetooth, so you must use the IR HotSync option. Since you are using Windows 7 64-bit, I believe that you are going to have to upgrade to Palm Desktop 6.2.2 to make things work from an OS/Driver perspective.
Since you are using such an old device, you are also going to have to download and install the PalmHotSyncSetup Utility from Pimlico. This update turns on support for old Palm OS PDAs in Palm Desktop 6.2.2. Without the update, you won't be able to sync your Visor with Palm Desktop 6.2.2. The software is free and the link is all the way at the bottom of the screen.
Lastly, if your PC doesn't have an IR port on it, you will need to purchase a USB to IR adapter. Some laptops still have IR ports and most desktops don't.
Once you have all the pieces, you'll want to go back to the Windows 7 and Vista HotSync thread again, and follow the directions for setting up and configuring IR HotSyncs.
Alan G

I can't play online games and some websites are not responding, i can't even check my emails

im having problems with online games, and when i go to Firefox help,
i get this msg: Warning: You're using an insecure version of Firefox. To keep your computer and personal information safe, please update to the latest version of Firefox.
but i have the latest version already...
and when i check my plugins...it's blank...it doesn't show anything...a few days ago, i was able to update my plugins, but today, it's blank

hi AireVuqe101
I'm referring your post to our Social Media Tech Team for some further assistance.
You may not receive any contact from them until Monday, so if you need further assistance in the meanwhile, we do have a 24 hour Technical Support team who can be contacted by either calling 133933 or via Live Chat http://tel.st/gq6m
Regards

QUERY DIFF BETWEEN CHECK AND IF

Hi all,
what is the difference between check and if.
Which one is advisable to use in dialog program for field statment
Thanks
PREETI

Hi,
they work in different ways.
IF..ENDIF.
If u use "if .. endif" the program continues after the endif, and execute the code bewteen if and endif is the condition is fulfilled.
CHECK
If u use check, and if the condition is not fullfill, all the lines after the instructions will not be executed.
With check instruction, un can exit from a form before the end of it.
For example :
form use_check using value.
if value gt 0.
value = value * 100.
endif.
endform.
in this case u could use check.
form use_check using value.
check value gt 0.
value = value * 100.
endform.
When use one instead of the other? depends on wich u have to do.
Hope it helps
Andrea
Pls reward if it helps

Difference between capacity formulae and scheduling formulae in workcenter

Hi experts please give me the solution for my queries
1. What are the capacity formulae and scheduling formulae in workcenter, give me examples, What is the difference between capacity formulae and scheduling formulae in workcenter , how these are used in workcenter.
2. what is group and group counter in routing , how these are used in routing , please explain.
3. what is the difference between PRTs created with MM01 AND CF01
4. what is alternative group and order catagery
5. what is system status , user status and authorisation matrix

>
hemamaheswararao wrote:
> Hi experts please give me the solution for my queries
> 1. What are the capacity formulae and scheduling formulae in workcenter, give me examples, What is the difference between capacity formulae and scheduling formulae in workcenter , how these are used in workcenter.
> 2. what is group and group counter in routing , how these are used in routing , please explain.
> 3. what is the difference between PRTs created with MM01 AND CF01
> 4. what is alternative group and order catagery
> 5. what is system status , user status and authorisation matrix
Dear Hemamashewararao,
Welcome to SDN !
As per rules you need to raise only one query as per one thread
Coming to your first query
As per business requirement formula will be defined
The most important difference between Capacity formula and scheduling formula
In SPRO
for scheduling formula tick mark will be marked for scheduling where as for capacity option tick mark will not ticked
For capacity formula tick mark will be marked for option capacity where as for scheduling option tick mark will not ticked
Currently i am not in front of SAP so i couldn't give you path
Good Luck !!!
Regards
Madhu

DB Check and Online Backup failed

Hi!
I would like to execute DB check, DB online backup and other db relevant actions.
Unfortunately when I schedule and execute DB check from tcode DB13 I get the following error:
BR0801I BRCONNECT 7.00 (38)
BR0805I Start of BRCONNECT processing: ceafbnrz.chk 2009-03-25 10.53.35
BR0484I BRCONNECT log file: F:oracleSC3sapcheckceafbnrz.chk
BR0280I BRCONNECT time stamp: 2009-03-25 10.53.36
BR0301E SQL error -1012 at location db_connect-5, SQL statement:
'SELECT NAME FROM V$DATABASE WHERE ROWNUM = 1'
ORA-01012: not logged on
BR0310E Connect to database instance SC3 failed
BR0280I BRCONNECT time stamp: 2009-03-25 10.53.36
BR0301E SQL error -1012 at location db_connect-5, SQL statement:
'SELECT NAME FROM V$DATABASE WHERE ROWNUM = 1'
ORA-01012: not logged on
BR0310E Connect to database instance SC3 failed
BR0806I End of BRCONNECT processing: ceafbnrz.chk 2009-03-25 10.53.36
BR0280I BRCONNECT time stamp: 2009-03-25 10.53.36
BR0804I BRCONNECT terminated with errors
When I try to execute online backup with BRARCHIVE I get the following error:
BR0051I BRBACKUP 7.00 (38)
BR0055I Start of database backup: beafcicl.and 2009-03-25 14.43.27
BR0484I BRBACKUP log file: F:oracleSC3sapbackup eafcicl.and
BR0071E BRBACKUP currently running or was killed
BR0072I Please delete file F:oracleSC3sapbackup.lock.brb if BRBACKUP was killed
BR0073E Setting of BRBACKUP lock failed
BR0056I End of database backup: beafcicl.and 2009-03-25 14.43.27
BR0280I BRBACKUP time stamp: 2009-03-25 14.43.28
BR0054I BRBACKUP terminated with errors
Can some one tell me how to solve this problem?
Thank you very much!
regards
Jürgen

> The content of the file alert<sid>.log
> Wed Mar 25 17:13:46 2009
> Errors in file f:\oracle\sc3\saptrace\usertrace\sc3_ora_1488.trc:
> ORA-07445: exception encountered: core dump [ACCESS_VIOLATION] [_opiosq076] [PC:0x10565AC] [ADDR:0x46] [UNABLE_TO_READ] []+
This doesn't look good
Are you running the latest patchset and interim patch? Some ORA-07445 were fixed with the patches.
Markus

Inconsistency between capacity online check and CM01/CM02

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for