System error: Inconsistency between Credit/debit indicator and amounts

Hi All,
I am getting this error as while trying to release a billing document to accounting. The Message no. is F5693
Please help!
Thanks,
Anupriya

Dear Kaushik,
System is triggering this error from following includes.
LFACIF4T
LFACIF4Z
IF ACCCR_FI-WRBTR LT 0
OR ACCCR_FI-SKFBT LT 0
OR ACCCR_FI-BUALT LT 0
OR ACCCR_FI-WSKTO LT 0
OR ACCCR_FI-KZBTR LT 0
OR ACCCR_FI-QSFBT LT 0
OR ACCCR_FI-QSSHB LT 0
OR ACCCR_FI-WMWST LT 0
OR ACCCR_FI-GBETR LT 0.
check whether any of the above field value is less than 0.
Thanks & Regards,
Hegal K Charles

Similar Messages

Inconsistency between a document field and the prof. segment number

Hi,
While processing an invoice in one company code for vendor# XXX with the PO# AAAA line# 10, it is showing below error message while posting. Please advise on the below error or fix the issue to post the invoice in to SAP. The using screen T-code is miro.
Inconsistency between a document field and the prof. segment number
*Message no. KE396
*Diagnosis
A line item was assigned to a profitability segment (number 0008629207) which has the value 0000101000 for characteristic Profit Center. The original document (FI document, sales order, internal order, etc.), however, contains 0000102020 in this field. It is therefore inconsistent with the profitability segment found.
System response
The characteristics in Profitability Analysis (CO-PA) must have the same characteristic values as the original document. For example, you cannot assign a sales order to a different customer or product than the one contained in the original sales order. If you wish to fill the characteristics with different contents, you must change the original fields.
Procedure
Enter the correct characteristic values on the CO-PA assignment screen. The system will automatically assign a corresponding profitability segment number. If it is not possible to enter values in some of these fields, delete the entire assignment to a profitability segment number and then enter it again.
As a rule, you should first enter the fields in the original sender document and then make the assignment to a profitability segment.
What should I do for the above pl ?
Regards
Murali

Hi,
While doing PGR at VL32N, we are facing this error. Can someone assist.
Regards,
Aruna

Link between Credit Risk Category and Terms of Payment

Hi,
Is there a link between the Credit risk category and the terms of payment. Where can we maintain this.
For instance, if risk category is x, the top is a, risk category is y, top is b.
Please suggest.

There is no link between credit risk category and Terms of Payment. The Risk Category is assigned to credit limit of the customer which determines if it will be blocked at certain level for sales transactions or just a warning message that the customer is over the limit. For the terms of payment, it just determines when it's due or whether it's overdue or not.

Inconsistency between get-childitem -include and -exclude parameters

Hi,
Powershell 2.0
Does anyone else consider this a minor design bug in the Get-ChildItem command?
# create dummy files
"a","b","c" | % {$null | out-file "c:\temp\$_.txt"}
# this "fails", returns nothing
get-childitem c:\temp -include a*,b*
# this "works", returns desired files
get-childitem c:\temp\* -include a*,b*
# this "works", excludes undesired files
get-childitem c:\temp -exclude a*,b*
# this "fails", excludes undesired files BUT RECURSES sub-directories
get-childitem c:\temp\* -exclude a*,b*
I'm writing a wrapper script around the GCI cmdlet, but the inconsistency between the two parameters is problematic. My end user will surely just type a path for the path parameter, then wonder why -include returned nothing. I can't unconditionally
add an asterisk to the path parameter, since that messes up the exclude output.
I'm just wondering why Microsoft didn't make the parameter interaction consistent???
# includes desired files in the specified path
get-childitem -path c:\temp -include a*,b*
# excludes undesired files in the specified path
get-childitem -path c:\temp -exclude a*,b*
# combine both options
get-childitem -path c:\temp -include a*,b* -exclude *.log,*.tmp
# same as above, the asterisk doesn't matter
get-childitem -path c:\temp\* -include a*,b*
get-childitem -path c:\temp\* -exclude a*,b*
get-childitem -path c:\temp\* -include a*,b* -exclude *.log,*.tmp
# same as above, but explicitly recurse if that's what you want
get-childitem -path c:\temp\* -include a*,b* -recurse
get-childitem -path c:\temp\* -exclude a*,b* -recurse
get-childitem -path c:\temp\* -include a*,b* -exclude *.log,*tmp -recurse
If I execute the "naked" get-childitem command, the asterisk doesn't matter...
# same results
get-childitem c:\temp
get-chileitem c:\temp\*
If this isn't considered a bug, can you explain why the inconsistency between the two parameters when combined with the -path parameter?
Thanks,
Scott

The Get-ChildItem cmdlet syntax is horrific for advanced use. It's not a bug in the classic sense, so you shouldn't call it that. However, feel free to call it awful, ugly, disastrous, or any other deprecatory adjective you like - it really is
nasty.
Get-ChildItem's unusual behavior is rooted in one of the more 'intense' dialogues between developers and users in the beta period. Here's how I recall it working out; some details are a bit fuzzy for me at this point.
Get-ChildItem's original design was as a tool for enumerating items in a namespace -
similar to but not equivalent to dir and
ls. The syntax and usage was going to conform to standard PowerShell (Monad at the time) guidelines.
In a nutshell, what this means is that the Path parameter would have truly just meant Path - it would not have been usable as a combination path specification and result filter, which it is now. In other words
(1) dir c:\temp
means you wanted to return children of the container c:\temp
(2) dir c:\temp\*
means you wanted to return children of all containers inside
c:\temp. With (2), you would never get c:\tmp\a.txt returned, since a.txt is not a container.
There are reasons that this was a good idea. The parameter names and filtering behavior was consistent with the evolving PowerShell design standards, and best of all the tool would be straightforward to stub in for use by namespace
providers consistently.
However, this produced a lot of heated discussion. A rational, orthogonal tool would not allow the convenience we get with the dir command for doing things like this:
(3) dir c:\tmp\a*.txt
Possibly more important was the "crash" factor. It's so instinctive for admins to do things like (3) that our fingers do the typing when we list directories, and the instant failure or worse, weird, dissonant output we would get with a more pure Path
parameter is exactly like slamming into a brick wall.
At this point, I get a little fuzzy about the details, but I believe the Get-ChildItem syntax was settled on as a compromise that wouldn't derail people expecting files when they do (3), but would still allow more complex use. I think that this
is done essentially by treating all files as though they are containers for themselves. This saves a lot of pain in basic use, but introduces other pain for advanced use.
This may shed some light on why the tool is a bit twisted, but it doesn't do a lot to help with your particular wrapping problem. You'll almost certainly need to do some more complicated things in attempting to wrap up Get-ChildItem. Can you describe some
details of what your intent is with the wrapper? What kind of searches by what kind of users, maybe? With those details, it's likely people can point out some specific approaches that can give more consistent results.

FLEX GL table credit debit indicator are populating wrong

Used BTE 1120 to change the posting keys during creation of FI document and document created successfully and updated GL tables(BKPF,BSEG) correctly but Flex GL table(FAGLFLEXA) has the wrong debit credit indicator?any Ideas?

Hi,
According your question what i understood is there is difference in the amount of FS10N i.e. GL balances and FBL3n Line item display ,the gl is GRIR clearing account the amount is showing GL Balance but the same amount is not showing in FBL3N right.
If yes goto FS00 and check line item display is selceted are not if not selected ,Select the check box and goto se38 and run RFSEPA01 program and then Then enter that GL account number and Document number 1 to 999999999 and company code and run & then check again fs10n and FBL3n it will match.
Regards,
Santosh kumar

HT4528 My phone will not allow me to update apps or purchase anything with my itunes card. It tells me that I need a valid card. I do not use a credit/debit card and only purchase with itunes cards.... what can I do for my phone to download?

I cannot download, purchase, or update any apps because it says my credit card is invalid; however, I only use iTunes cards.... how can I correct this problem?

To be exact the error says the iphone could not be restored, an unknown error occured (-1). What is that?

My VLC and Quick Time Players just won't work at all. It keeps bringing up a system error. Any advice, My VLC and Quick Time Players just won't work at all. It keeps bringing up a system error. Any advice

Just can't understand why it randomly stopped working. If you think you have a resolve or a media player that works better pleasee let me know as soon as you can. It would be very much appreciated. Thanks again.

Launch the Console application in any of the following ways:
☞ Enter the first few letters of its name into a Spotlight search. Select it in the results (it should be at the top.)
☞ In the Finder, select Go ▹ Utilities from the menu bar, or press the key combination shift-command-U. The application is in the folder that opens.
☞ If you’re running Mac OS X 10.7 or later, open LaunchPad. Click Utilities, then Console in the page that opens.
Step 1
Enter the name of the crashed application or process in the Filter text field. Post the messages from the time of the last crash, if any — the text, please, not a screenshot.
Step 2
Still in the Console window, look under User Diagnostic Reports for crash reports related to the process. The report name starts with the name of the crashed process, and ends with ".crash". Select the most recent report and post the contents — again, the text, not a screenshot. For privacy’s sake, I suggest that, before posting, you edit out the “Anonymous UUID,” a long string of letters, numbers, and dashes in the header of the report, if it’s present (it may not be.)

Inconsistency between capacity online check and CM01/CM02

Hi All,
Please help.
During production order creation (change) capacity availability check online results differ from results in CM01/CM02.
I've already used capacity basic load report RCCYLOAD and created basic load.
For the evaluation (CM01/02) i use overall profile SAPSFC010 (work center basic load). For capacity availability check online- profile recommended by SAP- SAPSFCG013 (SFC:Capacity availability check >= 3.0D).
Don't know what could it be.
Thanks,
Regards, Andrey

Error found in Capacity leveling profile.

Error when generating program /SAPAPO/TSM141 and Errors in source system

Hello APO Experts!
I had to include a new key figure in the cube and the planning area with configuration semantic = 000.
The problem is, in my DEV system, the modification was perfect. Then when I did in the QA system, I´ve got the error "Error when generating program /SAPAPO/TSM141" and u201CErrors in source systemu201D when trying to load data in the Infopackage.
Do you have any idea of what this could be?
Best Regards
Nik

Hello,
The problem may come from the inconsistency between the datasource settings and the content in table /SAPAPO/TSAREATE.
- SE16, go to table /SAPAPO/TSAREATE, input the planning area name, check the extraction structure, which is started from '/1APO/EXT_STRU'.
- SE16, go to table /SAPAPO/TSAREAEX, input the datasource name, and check the extraction structure.
Are the two extraction structures the same or different ?
If they're different, please read the below solutions, otherwise, you can ignore the following.
In general and most customer cases this inconsistency happens during transporting of datasource alone. In many cases the planning area is directly created at target system and datasoucre transported from a a different system which causes incorrect export structure entry in planning area table.
Please refer to following content from note 549184:
Q4: Why could I have extraction problem after transport of DataSource?
A4: DataSources for DP/SNP planning areas depend directly on the structure of the planning areas. That's why the planning area MUST ALWAYS be transported with or before the DataSource.
The simple solution will be to create a dummy data source for this planning area. This will regenerate the extract structure for all other data sources as well and update the corresponding tables. After that you can delete the dummy datasource.
After delete the dummy datasource, in case of inconsistency, please also run the report /SAPAPO/TS_PSTRU_GEN report for
- Basis - form routines
- Create planning objects
- Planning area extractor
with the flags "Reset generation time stamp" and "Generate" set.
And in order to transfer datasource correctly, please also refer to the consulting note 514524.
Best Regards,
Ada

HT201304 I have been trying for two weeks to log into iTunes using my Bank of America Visa Debit card but no progress. Is it that iTunes does not use debit card, I only have a debit card and Not credit card, so does it mean I can't use iTunes .?

I have been trying for two weeks to log into iTunes using my Bank of America Visa Debit card but no progress. Is it that iTunes does not use debit card, I only have a debit card and Not credit card, so does it mean I can't use iTunes .?

I believe if you haven't already setup an itunes account, if you have access to computer with iTunes installed , you can create an iTunes account on that computer with no credit/debit card and then just buy iTunes cards at your local retailer to get credits.

Link b/w credit horizon period and pricing proceadure

Hi Gurus
what is the link between credit horizon period and pricing proceadure.

Hi there,
Also check in OVA8 what is the horizion in Dynamic credit check for your credit control area.
Could be that the system is defaulting the horizion from there.
But as per standard, for your case system willnot check the orders that are due for delivery after 2 months. It will consider the orders that are due for delivery only within the 2 months of the order date.
So check the delivery due date is within the 2 months period or after the 2 months.
Regards,
Sivanand

Requirement class- consumtion indicator and requirement reduction indicator

hi
in DEMAND MANAGEMENT WE CAN SET REQUIREMENT CLASS
can any one elobrate whats the difference between the consumption indicator and requirement reduction indicator.
in help i dint get any explanation regarding the indicators which we need to se at requirement class
in siemens material i got the diff on between but i couldnt understood
can any experts elobrate the issue.
the explantion is like that
consmtion is not the only integartion between actual sales requirements and PIR. reduction of the PIR will also takes place asa result of the sales requirement.
Reduction is the process of actual reducing the value of PIR and its stored in the system. where as during consumtion the actual value stored was not changed, only the quantity passed to planning was lowerd.
can any body elobrate the above statement
regards
sasikanth

HI
Consumption indicator
The PIR are consumed with respectve to sales order
requirement reduction indicator
make-to-stock production is reduced by customer requirements which are planned as sale from stock
-ashok

Credit memo request and invoice correction request

Hi,
Can anybody please explain the difference between Credit memo request and invoice correction request?
Regards
Deepak

Hi Deepak
Credit memo request -- A credit memo is used when a customer has to get receive some credit amount to customer
Example : If billing happens for 100pcs but any damage happened in transit and he received only 75pcs and the customer has paid for 100pcs then we can raise the credit memo only for that 25pcs qty
Invoice Correction request -- It is a also a document type where a customer can receive anyone debit memo or credit memo based on the request raised by the customer
Credit memo Example : If the billing happens for 100pcs and the billing price is Rs.25000/- but do to some mistake Rs.27500/- happened then a Credit memo has to be issued to customer
Debit memo Example : If the billing happens for 100pcs and the billing price is Rs.25000/- but do to some mistake Rs.23500/- happened then a debit memo has to be issued to customer
Regards
Srinath

Rebate agreement-Difference coming for credit note value and drill down value .

Hello Friends,
In 2013 we had created one rebate for which the validity period was 1st April 2013 to 31st March 2014 . At the end of each month, rebate amount was settled by raising credit note to the customer . Now at the end of March'14 during final settlement, a credit note was raised to the customer . The issue here is there is difference of 1.13 (Pounds) between credit note value and the drill down value for March'14 . Lets say our credit note value is-100 (Pounds)and Drill down value for the month March'14 is 101.13 Pounds. We are not able to find out why this difference is coming . Please let me know your inputs on this .
Regards,
Sandeep G.

Sandeep -
During final settlement of a rebate agreement, it calculates rebate amout for the the entire time period less payments already made to a customer and then issues a credit memo request based on that.Please check all the the invoices created during entire period and check accrual calculation.It should match.
You can check VBOX table to get billing documents for the entire period.
Let us know if you still have an issue.
Thanks & Regards
Amit Gupta

System error: Incorrect Customizing for field

Hello guru's,
I am using badi (mb_migo_badi) on migo transaction for adding a custom tab.
In mseg table custom include (CI_COBL) I had added two fields which is zct3no and zct3dt
when the time of transaction :
the field which i had taken , migo document is generating properly and the values of customized tab fields inserting in mseg table properly .
The badi which i had done is working properly for document creation, but at the time of display this document the error is coming :
system error: incorrect customizing for field : ct3no and ct3dt
Thanks & regards,
Sandeep.
Moderator message : Duplicate post locked.
Edited by: Vinod Kumar on Oct 23, 2011 1:01 PM

Hi Sandip,
I think there is a similar post you posted in the same forum.
Regards,
Madhu.

System error: Inconsistency between Credit/debit indicator and amounts

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for