Inconsistency in GL account

Good day sir/madam,
I have a problem of GL account inconsistency. After merging company 2 years ago, the company did not use a company code XXX any longer. Along last year (2006), we did not post any amount to GL account 900000 (profit and loss) in any period that caused all the entries in trx FS10N blank. Somehow after closing the year of 2006 and opening the year of 2007, I found the amount of -768.200 IDR from balance carry forward line and all the other period of year 2007. I have no idea where the amount came from. Could you give me some info to investigate this problem so that we can find the activity that caused this problem happened.
Thank you for your support.
Regards.

Hi,
Try rerunning F.16 in test run/normal run and see if it shows again.
Rgds.

Similar Messages

  • Change bank account number

    Dear All,
    How Can I change bank account number from 11 characters to 12 characters for a company code?
    I tried to do it in FBZP but I have an error message that I can't do this change for a bank account number longer than 11 characters.
    Is there any solution?
    Thanks
    Ferdaws

    Hi,
    @Innamuri : I tried to maintain the correct bank account in alternative account number but I don't know why there is also an inconsistency between bank account number and alternative account number.
    For example : In bank account number (X00000XXYYX) --- > 11 characters
    and      In alternative account number (0X00000XXYYX) -
    > 12 characters
    I understand from that that the first number 0 in bank account number it's not maintained.
    @ Smuthyala : We haven't the right to do this.
    Ferdaws

  • Error while posting advance from PO in ME2DP

    Hi
    I am posting vendor advance with TCode ME2DP (from PO).
    While saving, it gives following error:
    The update profile (DATE) is inconsistent
    Bank GL account: 10718901:
    Commitment maintained - PRO1 and funds center derived - FND1
    Vendor GL account 10321100:
    Commitment maintained - PRO1 and funds center derived  - FND1
    What could be possible error. I am not FM consultant. Please help

    Hi, seems it's due Update profile customazation.
    Which  Update profile  do you use, check settings for Update date in of39 for value type 51, and 54(if payment updates with this value type)
    If you changed  Update profile  befor then try to reconstract PO with tcode FMN4N

  • Password file users issue... RAC help please...

    Hi guys,
    i have a two node rac database installed on my laptop.. 11gr2.
    in rac a database will be accessed by more than once instance correct....
    here i have two instance myinst1 and myinst2.
    here if we add a user in any one of the instances (say myinst1).. using that user account. the user can connect to either the myinst1 and myinst2.... correct....
    say now i grant the user i just created with the SYSDBA and SYSOPER privileges.. (user created on myinst1).
    now i can connect to both of the instance using the following syntax as a sysdba..
    connect user/password@servicename as sysdba
    now here comes the best part..
    oracle states that once the user is given either the sysdba or sysoper it will be updated in the password file...
    now as i have created the user in the myinst1 instance and granted the privileges there... the password file at the node myinst1 shows the details of the user in the V$PWFILE_USERS views. where as the other instance myinst2 V$PWFILE_USERS does nt have the user...
    can any one tell me why is this happening... do i have to explictly grant the SYSDBA privilege on all the instances once if i want to grant a user with the sysdba or sysoper privilege...

    Surely there is more than this? I have always believed that the only valid configuration of a Password File in RAC is for a single file to be shared by all instances - by putting it on a shared file system or multipathed raw volume (like the database files), with a Unix symbolic link or init.ora SPFILE reference on each node. I have seen documentation that people have stored a database password file in ASM (SPFILE=+XYZ...) and even on NFS and CIFS.
    SYSDBA and SYSOPER access uses the password file of course and it is effectively part of the database, and to me it seems reasonable to expect that an instance will only update the one Password File it knows aboutwhen SYSDBA/OPER access is added, removed or changed; so the consequences of having multiple copies for a single database may be expected to be bad. It was noted here that granting SYSDBA privilege on one node leads to inconsistency in that account's privileges across nodes. Maybe worse is that removing SYSDBA access from one node could leave SYSDBA access to other nodes/instances in place, in clusters where there are multiple local password files... this can be viewed as a very serious security defect, which one of our DBAs has demonstrated.
    Now I have learned that Oracle's documentation does not actually give much advice about the configuration of Password Files for RAC; that while some people have done what I expected for years, some product guides suggest on the contrary that local copies should be created on each node; and even that Oracle may not support a single Password File on a shared device. Having Googled the web and scanned this forum quickly, I haven't found a resolution. I am stunned.
    I am sure that, of all people, the RAC SIG will be able to advise on this authoritatively, so please do so. If it turns out that Oracle does not recommend or support the use of a single shared file (*),then I suggest there is a significant issue.
    (*) Just to be clear, I am not refering to a SHARED password file, but to an EXCLUSIVE one that is on a shared storage volume accessed by every instance of the same RAC database. How Oracle behaves with a SHARED parameter setting may be another issue.

  • Reverse asset retirement......

    Hi Experts,
    One asset with acquisition date in 2008, was retired in Dec 2009.
    Now user wants to reverse the retirement in 2010.
    SAP is not allowing and giving error message "reversal not possible (asset value date in different fiscal year from posting date)"
    Can anyone help me for reversing this document?
    Thanks
    chin

    Hi Chin,
    The correct behaviour of the system is to NOT ALLOW such a posting.    
    A reversal in different fiscal years would cause a strong inconsistency
    in asset accounts.                                                                               
    As per note 703503 says, when the system allows such a posting is      
    considered an error and in this note you can find a report to reverse  
    "wrong reversal" documents.                                            
    Best Regards Bernhard

  • Passing rectification entries

    Hi,
    I have a issue :
    User wants to pass adjustment entry by crediting asset a/c and debiting asset a/c of date 31.03.07 but the problem is both account are asset reco account.
    Please can anyone suggest what needs to be done in the following case.

    Hi,
       First check why the adjustment is supposed to be made.
       Only if it relates to an inconsistency in the account balance & the FIAA Balance then:-
              a) If from the initial upload -  Use OASV.
              b) Other reasons    - Use  ABF1  - This permits direct posting on Asset Rec.Accounts
    Kind regards

  • UME - User accounts - Entity is inconsistent

    Hi,
    We have pointed our UME to the LDAP (i.e. AD) to pull out the user records. We did not know to make that into effect, we have to restart the Application Server (i.e. J2EE). So we were not able to see the LDAP as a possible data source in UME.
    Meanwhile, we created some test users in UME, which have the same userID as that in LDAP and SAP. So for example, we have Baldwin01 in UME, in SAP, and also in LDAP. This seems to allow the email to be sent out successfully during the various provisioning process in ERM, CUP.
    However, recently, our administrator account in UME got locked out due to password lock-out. To solve this, we activated the emergency account SAP* to unlock the administrator account. and as part of this process, the Application server was restarted.
    This restart seem to have an impact on the UME, as now, we can now see the LDAP as a data source, when previously we were not able to. and we could also see all LDAP users. However, we are now not able to log on to those users that was previously created in UME (i.e. the Baldwin01 example above), as the UME now seems to detect 2 Baldwin01, one created in UME and one pulled from LDAP. To add on to the problems, every single LDAP pulled record has this "Entity is inconsistent" issue pegged to the user account.
    We tried to run a consistency check, and accepted the interactive repairs, but the "Entity is inconsistent" issue remains.
    In GRC, from the launchpad, because it is authenticating against the UME, none of the accounts can log on, except the Administrator account. The only time we can use the UME users is when we request access in CUP (where we are prompted to logon using my network ID (i.e. LDAP) and pw).
    We really appreciate help on how to resolve this "Entity is inconsistent" issue. Many thanks!

    Hi,
      I have never seen this issue. In this case, this issue is not at all related to GRC products. You should try to delete all the earlier UME user accounts. If you can not remove them then remove the LDAP datasource association with UME and then remove all the UME accounts. Once this is done, reconnect LDAP as UME datasource.
    If this does not resolve then you should open a customer message with netweaver team.
    Regards,
    Alpesh

  • Unable to release to accounting on VF02 - Inconsistency on posting tables

    Hi Everyone,
    We are unable to release a billing document on VF02. IF we check on SM13, it generates an error on FM RV_INVOICE_POST.
    Error details is "V2 030: Inconsistency in the posting tables for document XXXXXXXX"
    We have checked the ABAP editor but we are unable to interpret the code:
    On subroutine PERFORM VBPA_BEARBEITEN from RV_INVOICE_POST, program passes value of xvbfa-vbeln to structure beleg, because of that beleg-id changes from '$' to 0 because xvbfa-vbeln already has a value.
    LOOP AT xvbfa WHERE updkz EQ updkz_new.
        beleg = xvbfa-vbeln.
        PERFORM vbrk_belegnummer_ermitteln.
        xvbfa-vbeln = xvbrk-vbeln.
        MODIFY xvbfa.
      ENDLOOP.
    But on subroutine vbrk_belegnummer_ermitteln there is a condition on beleg-id which is cause of the error:
      IF beleg-id NE '$'.
        MESSAGE a030 WITH beleg.
      ENDIF.
    Please advise. Thanks.

    sorry i have to correct my post, the code should be:
    LOOP AT xvbpa WHERE updkz = updkz_new.
        beleg = xvbpa-vbeln.
        PERFORM vbrk_belegnummer_ermitteln.
        xvbpa-vbeln = xvbrk-vbeln.
        MODIFY xvbpa.
      ENDLOOP.
    NOT vbfa.
    I will look on OSS note that you said, see if it works.

  • G/L account determination inconsistent for differences

    Hi,
    We have a situation where the G/L account determined for the differences from Goods issue is coming out different in the Dev & Q systems - both materials are FERT, mvt type is 641 and configurations are same in OBYC, OMWN, OMWM, OMWD and OMSK, and same valuation area in both materials..yet, in the Dev system them the Transaction Key getting determined is PRD while in the Q system it is BSX because of which the G/L accounts are coming out different...what else can I check here? - anything in the material master that could be affecting/driving this? Appreciate your help...
    Thank you.

    Hi Yogesh,
    When you have differences in MIRO, the system tries to post them to the same account where the GR was charged. In case of MAP valuated materials this is the stock account (BSX). However, if the current stock at the moment when MIRO is posted is lower than the MIRO qty, only part of the difference amount is posted to the stock; the other part goes to the price diff acct (PRD). In the extreme case when there's no stock at all, the entire difference is posted to the price diff acct.
    The reason is to prevent irrational MAP on the material (since MAP has to follow the stock value, i.e. = stock value / stock qty). If the stock is zero the stock value (= the balance on the stock acct) shall also be zero!
    So please check how much stock you had in each system at the time of MIRO and compare these stock qties to the MIRO qties in each system.
    BR
    Raf

  • Two Google accounts, inconsistent calendar options

    I'm using OS6 on a Pearl 3G (9100).
    I've got two Google accounts set up with BIS.  One is my primary account, hosted on a Google Apps account.  The other is a regular @gmail.com account.
    For the Apps account (which was also the first added), there's a synchronization option for whether to sync the calendar or not.  I have it selected, as this is the calendar I use.  In the BB calendar, it registers as "Default".
    For the @gmail.com account, there is NO option in the account settings for calendar synchronization.  If I go into the BB calendar settings, I see two calendars: Default (the Apps account) and "[email protected]".  I cannot find a way to NOT synchronize this calendar.
    I wouldn't mind so much, but whenever I create a new calendar entry, there is no option for which calendar to put it in, and it always ends up in the @gmail.com one -- NOT where I want it.
    Does anyone know how to do one of the following?
    Disable synchronizing with the @gmail.com calendar so I only have the Apps one connected
    When I create a new appointment, have it entered into the Apps account's calendar and NOT the @gmail.com one
    Thanks...

    If you sync with multiple calendars they will automatically show up together in one calendar but will also be listed as separate calendars so you will have a calendar list that goes 'All', 'Work', 'Home' etc etc When I set this up on the iPhone I prefer the CalDAV approach and there are plenty of instructions available on the web like this one http://blogs.sun.com/chienr/entry/configuringcaldav_on_iphone3
    I haven't done multiple Google address books so someone else will have to help you there

  • Inconsistent info, 2 iPhones, one account?

    Upgraded my phone and now my app library shows that I have 4 updates available but when I try to update I get "No updates are currently available. To check for updates for another account, sign in with that account." I only have one account but 2 iPhones. Sync'd them both but still getting the same message. Any ideas?

    JoJo2007 wrote:
    Thanks for the response Dave. You were right, when I checked the way you explained, I found many (most) purchased with a (now) non-existant email address. Is there a way to merge the old with the new?
    Sorry but no, there isn't. You'll need to use both the old and new iTunes Store IDs to get your apps updated.
    Regards.

  • Inconsistency of prepaid phone/account, lack of availability of CSR's

    I'm trying to find out for a friend who has a pre-paid account with lots of available time- he's temporarily virtually a shut-in where cell service is sporadic and even copper's not very reliable. He called me in desperation on his land-line today because more than half the time the cell tells him he has no minutes, which is incorrect. When he does get out, service is awful. All attempts to get a CSR are unsuccessful, he just gets shunted around the phone menus, has no internet access (it wouldn't matter, this site is mostly useless for anything except the most straightforward of technical or account problems). Is there any reliable way to actually get a human on the phone, or am I correct in assuming that Verizon is committed to extracting free help from the community to cover for poor customer support? When we were Alltel customers, we had lots of problems, but at least we could get a human to lie to us, instead of no usable answer out of the automatic system at all.

    When I call places usually if I push zero it will take me to a customer service rep so might try that.  Mary

  • Mail accounts refreshes inconsistently after Maverick update

    Hello. I updated to Maverick. Apple Mail program won't refresh after some time. And if it does it brings lot for it was waiting for a long time.
    I use Gmail Imap and another Gmail account with Imap again.
    Thanks...

    Yes I am having the same problem after upgrading to 10.9.2

  • Changing my Apple ID Account query

    I have an apple ID that is not in the form of an e-mail address.  For example: abcdefghijk99.  I've had it for years, going back to when I was a Windows PC user (until I saw the light 2 years ago and switched to Apple products) for itunes purchases initially.  As far as I was concerned my appleid was fine and I've used it to purchase more music and apps for my Mac, iphone, ipad and ipod since.  Then I discovered a problem. Having downloaded the Find My iphone app it prompted me for an appleid in the form of an e-mail address and would not accept my original appleid.  Likewise the same issue applied to the the same for finding the ipad.
    So I checked it out online a little to try and see if it is possible to change your applid and found the "My Apple ID" section at https://appleid.apple.com/cgi-bin/WebObjects/MyAppleId.woa/ and that under the "Manage my account" section you can make changes to your appleid account.  But changing your name to an e-mail address is not one of them, at least if it is to the e-mail address that is your default e-mail address as held by itunes.
    So ok, and I imagine others would suggest this, that I could set up another ID as an e-mail address and use this for the Find my iphone and ipad facilities.
    But looking forward, it doesn't solve the problem at all.
    1.  I've built up a fair history of purchases using itunes and from the App store under my original non e-mail address and I don't want to lose them.  And of course future updates to software that I've purchased from the App Store would be against my original appleid and I don't want to lose that thread.
    With the advent of "iCloud" I understand that it will want you to enter your Appleid in order to upload to, sync your devices with etc.,  If it wants this to be entered in e-mail address format then it will not be accessible to me.
    2.  Appleid software is inconsistent in that for iTunes and The App Store it will allow the ID to be entered both as a non E-Mail address and as an E-Mail address.  But for the Find my iphone App, will only accept an E-Mail format address as the Appleid.  I think this is perhaps a legacy of MobileMe, which possibly The iCloud is going to use the MobileMe format as an Appleid.  And if so that will have implications for other users who have the same type of appleid as me.
    3.  All I want to do is simply change my Appleid to my default E-Mail address, but it won't let me.  I raised this issue on the telephone with Apple who understood my issue, did not immediately know the answer, but said would discuss with colleagues and E-Mail me back.  The reply was:
    "I talked about your case with my colleagues. The only suggestion that came to mind is that you consult iTunes via email and ask if they can amend the ID or if it would be possible to transfer you purchases from one account to another account."
    Ok. So it led me to here, the Support area, because it seems impossible to be able to raise the issue by E-Mail with them, as much as I've tried to by going from page to page trying to find out "how to contact them".
    So does anyone here have any good ideas as to how I solve my problem?   Additionally is there anyone from Apple itself who monitors questions raised in this community?  If so could they let me know that they appreciate my problem and how/if it can be dealt with?
    Hoping someone comes up with a solution and looking forward to hearing from anyone with suggestions.

    Solved with assistance from iTunes support.  The main problem was that you cannot use an e-mail address which is associated with your existing account.  So the answer is to set set up a new e-mail address with your Internet Service provider.  Next step is to log into iTunes using your existing appleID (which in my case was a non e-mail address as mentioned in my question) and then modify your itunes id and e-mail account, both to the new e-mail address.  I tried it and it worked.  All downloaded history such as itunes music and apps that I have downloaded onto my devices over time has been retained.  Furthermore I can now use the "Find my iPhone app" to find both my iphone and iPad.  Likewise will be able to use this revised appleid to access iCloud once available and synch my apps etc.,  Very pleased with iTunes Support's prompt response and remedy.

  • Unable to cancel Billing due to cleared accounting document for Free Goods

    Hi,
    I have a case as described below:
    I.                    SALES ORDER CREATION
    Transaction VA01 à Sales order is created for the following details:
    1.       Material Normal  (TAN) : 100 CAR
    2.       Free Goods (TANN) : 10 CAR
    II.                  Subsequent processing of sales order 
    a.       Delivery(1) and Billing (1) creation for the SO with the following details :
    Material Normal (TAN) : 100 CAR
    Free Goods (TANN) : 5 CAR
    Status of accounting document after releasing billing document to Accounting: Not cleared
                    Accounting Journal:
                    A/R                                                                     xxxx
                    Sales discount                                                     xxxx
                                    General Domestic Sales                                        xxxx
                                    VAT u2013 Out(TAX)                                                    xxxx
    b.      Delivery (2) and Billing (2) is then being made for the leftover item of the Sales Order:
    Free Goods (TANN) = 5 CAR  
    Status of Accounting document after releasing billing document to Accounting: CLEARED
    Accounting Journal
    Dr. Sales Discount                                        xxxx
                            Cr. General Domestic Sales                  xxxx
    III.                Reversal of Billing (2) needs to be done
    Activities conducted:
    a.       Go to VF11 and enter Billing (2) document number
    b.      Execute!
    System response:
    Error Log:
    1)      Data inconsistency during processing of document xxxxxxx
    2)      The Billing Document xxxxxxx  is already cleared
    From the error found, we tried to reverse the cleared accounting document by using t-code FBRA:  
    System response:
    Document xxxxxx IS NOT  a clearing document
    Question:
    We have to reverse the clearing document first in order to cancel the related billing document but we keep finding this error, do Anyone have any advice to solve this issue?
    We have simulated similar transaction in IDES and no problem is found, is there any specific setting in customizing that can allow cancellation of billing document regardless of its accounting document status (Cleared or Not Cleared) ?
    Thanks in Advance,
    Indro

    Thanks a lot for the reply,
    It answers my question, I found the copying requirement using routine 029 was defined in the cancellation document section of the Billing type to be cancelled
    After removing, the billing document can be cancelled
    Thanks,
    Indro

Maybe you are looking for