Incremental Checkpoints

Hi,
I have a Oracle 10.2.0.4 Standard Edition database with a manual physical standby on a remote server. To synchronize my stnadby, I'm forcing a log switch then I copy the archive log on the standby site for recovery.
I'm having several "Checkpoint not complete" in the alert log and I found the reason: when you switch the log, there's only an incremental checkpoint not a full one... so when I force the switch and the system wants to recycle the first log (the one where the last full checkpoint occurs), I'm getting the warning because the database must complete the checkpoint.
My question: Is performing a "ALTER SYSTEM CHECKPOINT" before my log switch the solution to my problem or is there a better way to do so?
Thanks
Christophe

Hi Pavan,
I don't think there's any link with slow IO: as I said, the system is doing nothing and the archived logs are from 500K to 1.2M, with my redologs being at 50M.
For the FAST_START_MTTR_TARGET, I tested it with a value of 30 secondes and it does complete incremental checkpoint.
Here's an example of what is happening:
SQL> alter system checkpoint;
System altered.
SQL> select * from v$sysstat where name like '%background checkpoint%';
STATISTIC# NAME                                                                  CLASS      VALUE
       166 background checkpoints started                                            8          2
       167 background checkpoints completed                                          8          2
SQL> alter system switch logfile;
System altered.
SQL> select * from v$sysstat where name like '%background checkpoint%';
STATISTIC# NAME                                                                  CLASS      VALUE
       166 background checkpoints started                                            8          3
       167 background checkpoints completed                                          8          2
SQL> alter system switch logfile;
System altered.
SQL> select * from v$sysstat where name like '%background checkpoint%';
STATISTIC# NAME                                                                  CLASS      VALUE
       166 background checkpoints started                                            8          4
       167 background checkpoints completed                                          8          2
SQL> alter system checkpoint;
System altered.
SQL> select * from v$sysstat where name like '%background checkpoint%';
STATISTIC# NAME                                                                  CLASS      VALUE
       166 background checkpoints started                                            8          5
       167 background checkpoints completed                                          8          5I think, that in my case, the only option is to force a checkpoint before I force the switch to avoid the system to issue a "Checkpoint not complete" with all the transactions stopped while it complete the checkpoint.
Thanks
Christophe

Similar Messages

  • Incremental checkpoint up to RBA [0xe.58bfe.0], current log tail at RBA [0x

    I found the following entry in Oracle Apps R12 instance, database alert log file. I think, by default FAST_START_MTTR_TARGET is set to default ' 0 ' value. How to resolve the problem in Oracle Apps R 12 environment?
    Help me.

    From oracle site:
    FAST_START_MTTR_TARGET enables you to specify the number of seconds the database takes to perform crash recovery of a single instance. When specified, FAST_START_MTTR_TARGET is overridden by LOG_CHECKPOINT_INTERVAL.
    From "others" site:
    Oracle recommends using the fast_start_mttr_target initialization parameter to control the duration of startup after instance failure. With 10g, the Oracle database can now self-tune check-pointing to achieve good recovery times with low impact on normal throughput. You no longer have to set any checkpoint-related parameters.
    This method reduces the time required for cache recovery and makes the recovery bounded and predictable by limiting the number of dirty buffers and the number of redo records generated between the most recent redo record and the last checkpoint. Administrators specify a target (bounded) time to complete the cache recovery phase of recovery with the fast_start_mttr_target initialization parameter, and Oracle automatically varies the incremental checkpoint writes to meet that target.
    The target_mttr field of v$instance_recovery contains the MTTR target in effect. The estimated_mttr field of v$instance_recovery contains the estimated MTTR should a crash happen right away.
    For example,
    SQL> SELECT TARGET_MTTR, ESTIMATED_MTTR, CKPT_BLOCK_WRITES FROM V$INSTANCE_RECOVERY;
    TARGET_MTTR ESTIMATED_MTTR CKPT_BLOCK_WRITES
             37             22            209187Whenever you set fast_start_mttr_target to a nonzero value, and while MTTR advisory is ON, Oracle Corporation recommends that you disable (set to 0) the following parameters:
    LOG_CHECKPOINT_TIMEOUT
    LOG_CHECKPOINT_INTERVAL
    FAST_START_IO_TARGETQuerying the advisor
    In addition to the MTTR information in v$instance_recovery we also have an important column called optimal_logfile_size, and we can query for this value at any time. The value for optimal_logfile_size is expressed in megabytes and it changes frequently, based on the DML load on your database. For example,
    SQL> SELECT OPTIMAL_LOGFILE_SIZE FROM V$INSTANCE_RECOVERY;
    OPTIMAL_LOGFILE_SIZE
    256          If your database is relatively stable, then you can use this suggested size and rebuild your online redo log files to match the value. We would expect that a future version of Oracle will automate this and allow for dynamic re-sizing of online redo log files, but this is an issues because many Oracle systems expect the archived redo log files to always be the same size.

  • Incremental checkpoint and SCN

    Hi,
    I am getting messages of incremental checkpoint in my alert logs with some scn.
    >
    Completed checkpoint up to RBA [0x125de6.2.10], SCN: 445135162445
    >
    Does this mean that all dirty blocks which have had their initial changes before this SCN(445135162445) will be written to disk so that instance recovery can begin from the SCN from which checkpoint has completed.Or is it the other way like the incremental checkpoint has occured at scn 445135162445.
    Sekar

    user13485610 wrote:
    As per my knowledge, the checkpoint is classified as below (correct me if I am wrong somewhere)
    Checkpoint types can be divided as INCREMENTAL and COMPLETE.
    Also COMPLETE CHECKPOINT can be divided further into
    PARTIAL and FULL.
    It would be convenient to have a reference to the documents where you picked up this information. There may be further reading in them that clarifies the meaning. The terms have been around for a long time, of course, but it's always hard to get any sort of definitive description together - in your case, for example, you don't make any comment about which checkpoints lead to high priority writes and which to low, but the description of any type of checkpoint isi incomplete without some reference to the write priority.
    As far as classifying checkpoints by name - I'm not too concerned that there is still some confusion in the different way that people name or categorise them, provided that they can describe what's going on to ensure that there is no ambiguity. In this context I think there are only options to consider:
    a) does the particular type of checkpoint walk along the checkpoint queue (CKPTQ) in order to pick the blocks that need to be written to disc.
    b) does the particular type of checkpoint use a different queue (such as an object queue or file queue) to pick the blocks that need to be written to disc.
    c) is there any other mechanism for picking the blocks to be written - such as walking the LRU and identifying all dirty blocks.
    To my mind, an incremental checkpoint should probably have a definition that says it walks the checkpoint queue.
    I dislike the term "complete" if it then leads to the option for "partial" - how much clarity can you read into the statement "at this point Oracle does a partial complete checkpoint" (or should that be a "complete partial checkpoint") - but I can understand the need for a term of that sort to distinguish a checkpoint that is based on one of the other queues.
    But my doubt is mentioned below.
    2.At the time of log switch - Sometimes log switches may trigger a complete checkpoint , if the
    next log where the log switch is to take place is Active.
    Why is this behaves in this fashion? (Any internal thoughts on this please)This, in part, is why I'd like to see the reference document - I think that the term "complete" may have been given a different meaning at this point. If the logfile you want to use is still active checkpoint activity MUST take place urgently, but it need only be a checkpoint that walks the CKPTQ up to the point where the content of the target redo log can be discarded. This is no different from any other checkpointing due to log file switch - but it could have a higher degree of urgency. (The need to differentiate this special case on log file switch probably came about at the time that Oracle stopped triggering an automatic checkpoint at every log file switch.)
    Regards
    Jonathan Lewis

  • Delay record the checkpoint# in the controlfile by incremental checkpoint.

    Hi ,
    I want to make sure:
        alter system set log_checkpoints_to_alert=true;
    then
      I found , after a while , incremental checkpoint appears in the alertlog saying:
        begin checkpoint .... to RBA.....
        but for a long time , It still not write the controlfile for the checkpoint.
    Why?

    You think about it:
    Tue Aug 27 13:39:57 2013
    Beginning log switch checkpoint up to RBA [0xc.2.10], SCN: 1099698
    Thread 1 advanced to log sequence 12
      Current log# 3 seq# 12 mem# 0: /u01/app/oracle/oradata/ORCL/onlinelog/o1_mf_3_5qd610r2_.log
      Current log# 3 seq# 12 mem# 1: /u01/app/oracle/flash_recovery_area/ORCL/onlinelog/o1_mf_3_5qd6129l_.log
    Tue Aug 27 13:44:52 2013
    Completed checkpoint up to RBA [0xc.2.10], SCN: 1099698
    Tue Aug 27 13:50:36 2013
    Incremental checkpoint up to RBA [0xc.19c1.0], current log tail at RBA [0xc.1ac4.0]
    Tue Aug 27 14:20:41 2013
    Incremental checkpoint up to RBA [0xc.2472.0], current log tail at RBA [0xc.786a.0]
    Tue Aug 27 14:48:30 2013
    ALTER SYSTEM SET fast_start_mttr_target=900 SCOPE=BOTH;
    Tue Aug 27 14:50:45 2013
    Incremental checkpoint up to RBA [0xc.12777.0], current log tail at RBA [0xc.128cb.0]
    Tue Aug 27 14:56:17 2013
    Beginning log switch checkpoint up to RBA [0xd.2.10], SCN: 1226779
    Thread 1 advanced to log sequence 13
      Current log# 2 seq# 13 mem# 0: /u01/app/oracle/oradata/ORCL/onlinelog/o1_mf_2_5qd60xf3_.log
      Current log# 2 seq# 13 mem# 1: /u01/app/oracle/flash_recovery_area/ORCL/onlinelog/o1_mf_2_5qd60z37_.log
    Tue Aug 27 14:57:40 2013
    Thread 1 cannot allocate new log, sequence 14
    Private strand flush not complete
      Current log# 2 seq# 13 mem# 0: /u01/app/oracle/oradata/ORCL/onlinelog/o1_mf_2_5qd60xf3_.log
      Current log# 2 seq# 13 mem# 1: /u01/app/oracle/flash_recovery_area/ORCL/onlinelog/o1_mf_2_5qd60z37_.log
    Beginning log switch checkpoint up to RBA [0xe.2.10], SCN: 1226840
    Thread 1 advanced to log sequence 14
      Current log# 1 seq# 14 mem# 0: /u01/app/oracle/oradata/ORCL/onlinelog/o1_mf_1_5qd60t2s_.log
      Current log# 1 seq# 14 mem# 1: /u01/app/oracle/flash_recovery_area/ORCL/onlinelog/o1_mf_1_5qd60vr7_.log
    Tue Aug 27 14:58:27 2013
    Thread 1 cannot allocate new log, sequence 15
    Checkpoint not complete
      Current log# 1 seq# 14 mem# 0: /u01/app/oracle/oradata/ORCL/onlinelog/o1_mf_1_5qd60t2s_.log
      Current log# 1 seq# 14 mem# 1: /u01/app/oracle/flash_recovery_area/ORCL/onlinelog/o1_mf_1_5qd60vr7_.log
    Tue Aug 27 14:58:30 2013
    Completed checkpoint up to RBA [0xd.2.10], SCN: 1226779
    Tue Aug 27 14:58:32 2013
    Thread 1 cannot allocate new log, sequence 15
    Private strand flush not complete
      Current log# 1 seq# 14 mem# 0: /u01/app/oracle/oradata/ORCL/onlinelog/o1_mf_1_5qd60t2s_.log
      Current log# 1 seq# 14 mem# 1: /u01/app/oracle/flash_recovery_area/ORCL/onlinelog/o1_mf_1_5qd60vr7_.log
    Beginning log switch checkpoint up to RBA [0xf.2.10], SCN: 1226899
    Thread 1 advanced to log sequence 15
      Current log# 3 seq# 15 mem# 0: /u01/app/oracle/oradata/ORCL/onlinelog/o1_mf_3_5qd610r2_.log
      Current log# 3 seq# 15 mem# 1: /u01/app/oracle/flash_recovery_area/ORCL/onlinelog/o1_mf_3_5qd6129l_.log
    Tue Aug 27 15:02:39 2013
    Completed checkpoint up to RBA [0xe.2.10], SCN: 1226840
    Tue Aug 27 15:03:54 2013
    Completed checkpoint up to RBA [0xf.2.10], SCN: 1226899
    Tue Aug 27 15:20:49 2013
    Incremental checkpoint up to RBA [0xf.801.0], current log tail at RBA [0xf.92b.0]
    Tue Aug 27 15:42:00 2013
    At SCN: 1226779
    Begin the incremental checkpoint  at that SCN( Tue Aug 27 14:56:17 2013). At the db buffer cache, there must be some dirty block had not been writen into the disk.(Incremental Checkpoint)
    1226779 should not be recorded at the controlfile.
    After a while, (Tue Aug 27 14:58:30 2013). While happening some dirty block writing events, At the db buffer cache, all blocks became dirty before SCN 1226779,
    had been totally written into the disk.
    1226779 may have been record at the controlfile.

  • What is the difference between full checkpoint and incremental checkpoint?

    What is the difference between full checkpoint and incremental checkpoint?
    And what is checkpoint queue?
    Can someone clarify these concepts?
    Thanks!

    Hi,
    there are different types of checkpoints:
    - Full checkpoint:
    => DBWR writes all dirty buffers from the Buffer cache to the datafiles and CKPT retrieves a new Checkpoint Change Number from a sys owned sequence and writes this number to all file headers and the controlfile.
    -- can be triggered by different events, like a logswitch, a manual checkpoint (alter system ..), a shutdown and so on
    This is the setup point for SMON for a crash recovery.
    - Partial checkpoint:
    => DBWR writes all dirty buffers of a singel tablespace from the Buffer cache to the datafiles and CKPT retrieves a new Checkpoint Change Number from a sys owned sequence and writes this number to all file headers and the controlfile.
    -- can e triggered by an ALTER TABLESPACE OFFLINE, ALTER TABLESPACE READ ONLY, ALTER TABLESPACE BEGIN BACKUP statement.
    Incremental checkpoint:
    number to all file headers and the controlfile.
    -- can be triggered by different events, like a logswitch, a manual checkpoint (alter system ..), a shutdown and so on
    - Partial checkpoint:
    => DBWR writes all dirty buffers of a single tablespace from the Buffer cache to the datafiles and CKPT retrieves a new Checkpoint Change Number from a sys owned sequence and writes this number to all file headers and the controlfile.
    -- frequency is determined by FAST_START_MTTR_TARGET parameter (new feature to Oracle 9i), with wich you can specify a time in seconds which SMON is allowed to take maximal for a Crash Recovery until the database must be open again.
    Dapending on the system you have SMON must calculate the maximum number of Redolog-blocks which it can manage to recover in the specified number of seconds. It will then create so called incremental checkpoints which will be tracked in the so called checkpoint queue in memory.
    FAST_START_MTTR_TARGET is auto-tuned in Oracle 10g and Oracle tries to manage (incremental) checkpoint in a fashion that a minimum of I/Os are caused and a minimum time for crash recovery is needed.
    If you set LOG_CHECKPOINTS_TO_ALERT to TRUE you will find checkpoint information in the alertSID.log file. You will see FULL and INCREMENTAL checkpoints then.
    Hope this clarifies your question,
    Lutz Hartmann

  • Best Practice For Database Parameter ARCH_LAG_TARGET and DBWR CHECKPOINT

    Hi,
    For best practice - i need to know - what is the recommended or guideline concerning these 2 Databases Parameter.
    I found for ARCH_LAG_TARGET, Oracle recommend to setup it to 1800 sec (30min)
    Maybe some one can guide me with these 2 parameters...
    Cheers

    Dear unsolaris,
    First of all if you want to track the full and incremental checkpoints, make the LOG_CHECKPOINT_TO_ALERT parameter TRUE. You will see the checkpoint SCN and the completion periods.
    Full checkpoint is being triggered when a log switch happens and checkpoint position in the controlfile is written in the datafile headers. For just a really tiny amount of time the database could be consistent eventhough it is open and in read/write mode.
    ARCH_LAG_TARGET parameter is disabled and set to 0 by default. Here is the definition for that parameter;
    http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/B19306_01/server.102/b14237/initparams009.htm
    If you want to set this parameter up the Oracle recommends it to be 1800 as you have said. This can subject to change from database to database and it is better for you to check it by experiencing it.
    Regards.
    Ogan

  • Checkpoint not complete;;cannot allocate new log ;;; PLZ HELP ME

    Hi all,
    We are working on Oracle Database 10g Enterprise Edition Release 10.2.0.1.0 on a Redhat Linux Server platform.
    We are facing the following problem in the alert.log file :
    Wed Aug 22 02:58:57 2007
    Thread 1 cannot allocate new log, sequence 43542
    Checkpoint not complete
    Current log# 1 seq# 43541 mem# 0: /u01/oradata/DB01/redo01.log
    Thread 1 advanced to log sequence 43542
    Current log# 4 seq# 43542 mem# 0: /u01/oradata/DB01/redo04.log
    Current log# 4 seq# 43542 mem# 1: /u01/oraindx/DB01/redo04.log
    Wed Aug 22 03:00:00 2007
    Thread 1 advanced to log sequence 43543
    Current log# 5 seq# 43543 mem# 0: /u01/oradata/DB01/redo05.log
    Current log# 5 seq# 43543 mem# 1: /u01/oraindx/DB01/redo05.log
    Wed Aug 22 03:01:00 2007
    Thread 1 cannot allocate new log, sequence 43544
    Checkpoint not complete
    Current log# 5 seq# 43543 mem# 0: /u01/oradata/DB01/redo05.log
    Current log# 5 seq# 43543 mem# 1: /u01/oraindx/DB01/redo05.log
    Thread 1 advanced to log sequence 43544
    Current log# 6 seq# 43544 mem# 0: /u01/oradata/DB01/redo06.log
    Current log# 6 seq# 43544 mem# 1: /u01/oraindx/DB01/redo06.log
    Wed Aug 22 03:01:26 2007
    Thread 1 advanced to log sequence 43545
    Current log# 2 seq# 43545 mem# 0: /u01/oradata/DB01/redo02.log
    Thread 1 advanced to log sequence 43546
    Current log# 3 seq# 43546 mem# 0: /u01/oradata/DB01/redo03.log
    Thread 1 advanced to log sequence 43547
    Current log# 1 seq# 43547 mem# 0: /u01/oradata/DB01/redo01.log
    Wed Aug 22 03:01:38 2007
    Thread 1 cannot allocate new log, sequence 43548
    Checkpoint not complete
    Current log# 1 seq# 43547 mem# 0: /u01/oradata/DB01/redo01.log
    I know that this message indicates that Oracle wants to reuse a redo log file, but
    the current checkpoint position is still in that log. In this case, Oracle must
    wait until the checkpoint position passes that log. Because the
    incremental checkpoint target never lags the current log tail by more than 90%
    of the smallest log file size, this situation may be encountered :
    1-if DBWR writes too slowly,
    or
    2-if a log switch happens before the log is completely full,
    or
    3-if log file sizes are too small.
    I read some posts in this forum regarding this error but sincerly i don't know how to find the exact cause of this error? Maybe Should I add new redo files or one new redo group? I don't know how to resolve it :( ;;;
    such as I have 6 redo files 3 of them 5MB size and the others 3 files 10MB size ;
    Thank you,
    Regards,
    Message was edited by:
    HAGGAR

    Make DBWR write more aggressively - as you are on 9i the parameter I would use is FAST_START_MTTR_TARGET=(how long you want recovery to take in seconds), the lower that number, the more aggressively DBWR has to write to keep up with the target, the advantage of this is that by the time LGWR comes to overwrite the redo log file, the chances are that DBWR has already written the "high scn#" (and beyond) from the checkpoint q.
    -- This disadvantage is that you will get more I/O to your disks.
    2. Create more redo log file groups - this will give DBWR more time to write before LGWR tries to overwrite a particular redolog file, again the chances are that the extra (6th) or (7th) group will give CKPT enough time to completely checkpoint beyond the "highest scn#" before that group is again required..
    Which one to go for.. well that's up to you and your setup, if you have an I/O bound system then 2. would be better for you, as 1. will just increase your I/O problem, however if physical space is an issue and I/O isn't then 1. might be better (with the added advantage that instance recovery will also be faster).
    Sorry for the training session, but as with everything to do with Oracle, there is rarely one solution that apply to everyone...
    Gopu

  • Thread 1 cannot allocate new log - Checkpoint not complete caused by small

    Hello, one of my customers databases (setup by the customer) is running in archivelog mode. We find every day in the archivelog more than 10x the error "...cannot allocate new log - Checkpoint not complete "
    The system has theese parameters:
    select group#,members,bytes from v$log;
    GROUP# MEMBERS BYTES
    1 2 8388608
    2 2 8388608
    3 2 8388608
    4 2 8388608
    5 2 8388608
    6 2 8388608
    7 2 8388608
    8 2 8388608
    9 2 8388608
    10 2 8388608
    I asked the formder admin, why the redologs has only 8mb size. The answer was: "To find out, when there was big activity in the database. The count of archivelogs are bigger if you has small redologs. If you use some 250m redologs, we cannot see when tha database has big load. But this is important in case of recovery to recover the database to the point in time before the big load was has taken place." ... ???
    Okay, if the customer wants to have 8 MB redologs ... I don´t care. But how can i prevent now the error message? The only way for me is to setup more redolog groups. But it would be very confusing to have 50 or 70 groups of redologs.
    What can I do else to prevent the error?

    what is the log frequency?
    logfile size?
    can you check fast_start_mttr_target as well
    check the following description:
    Sometimes, you can see in your alert.log file, the following corresponding
    messages:
    Thread 1 advanced to log sequence 248
    Current log# 2 seq# 248 mem# 0: /prod1/oradata/logs/redologs02.log
    Thread 1 cannot allocate new log, sequence 249
    Checkpoint not complete
    This message indicates that Oracle wants to reuse a redo log file, but
    the current checkpoint position is still in that log. In this case, Oracle must
    wait until the checkpoint position passes that log. Because the
    incremental checkpoint target never lags the current log tail by more than 90%
    of the smallest log file size, this situation may be encountered if DBWR writes
    too slowly, or if a log switch happens before the log is completely full,
    or if log file sizes are too small.
    When the database waits on checkpoints,redo generation is stopped until the
    log switch is done.
    Edited by: CKPT on Jul 19, 2010 7:37 PM

  • Checkpoint not complete error in alert log

    version : 10.2.0.5 , 11.2.0.2
    This is what I found about "Checkpoint not complete" from google
    "+This message indicates that Oracle wants to reuse a redo log file, but the current checkpoint position is still in that log. In this case, Oracle must+
    +wait until the checkpoint position passes that log. Because the incremental checkpoint target never lags the current log tail by more than 90%+
    +of the smallest log file size, this situation may be encountered if DBWR writes too slowly, or if a log switch happens before the log is completely full,+
    +or if log file sizes are too small.+ "
    Question1.
    What do they mean by Oracle reusing a redo log file ? When one ORL is full , oracle will switch to the next one ; it won't reuse it. Right ?
    Question2.
    "the current checkpoint position is still in that log" . What is checkpoint position ?
    Question3. How often does a checkpoint occur ? (frequency as per time)

    Question1.
    What do they mean by Oracle reusing a redo log file ? When one ORL is full , oracle will switch to the next one ; it won't reuse it. Right ?You have some groups of redo log, each redo log has members with same information. Redo log run in a circular way, when a group is full, changes to the next group of redo log and when the last group is written continue overwritten the first group.
    http://docs.oracle.com/cd/B28359_01/server.111/b28310/onlineredo001.htm
    Question2.
    "the current checkpoint position is still in that log" . What is checkpoint position ?copy and paste from:
    http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E14072_01/server.112/e10713/startup.htm#BABGDACG
    "A data structure that indicates the checkpoint position, which is the SCN in the redo stream where instance recovery must begin"
    Question3. How often does a checkpoint occur ? (frequency as per time)Checkpoints occur in diferents situations, not per time, please check:
    http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E11882_01/server.112/e16508/startup.htm#CNCPT89045

  • Process dbwriter and checkpoint

    Hi,
    It is known that when the redo log buffer is full at the third(1/3) , the datas which are in the redolog buffer are sent to the database's redo log files .
    What happens then with the dbwriter process and the checkpoint process?Is there a new sequence number( SCN=system change number) created when the redo log buffer is sent to the database ?
    Secondly, concerning the log_check_point_interval, can you explain to me what means that "in the number of redo log file blocks that can exist between an incremental checkpoint and the last block written to the redo log. This number refers to physical operating system blocks, not database blocks."
    LOG_CHECKPOINT_INTERVAL specifies the frequency of checkpoints in terms of the number of redo log file blocks that can exist between an incremental checkpoint and the last block written to the redo log. This number refers to physical operating system blocks, not database blocks.
    I don't exactly understand when occurs a log_checkpoint and what means that it concerns operating system blocks and not database blocks.
    Does it mean it concerns the redo log buffer?
    Thanks a lot for your answer.
    Best regards.
    Nathalie

    DBWR does not write dirty buffers to the corresponding disk blocks until the Redo for those blocks (i.e. the changes made to the blocks) has been written by LGWR to the online redo log files. Therefore, Redo is always written to disk before modified blocks (whether they be table or index or undo blocks) are rewritten to disk.
    The block size for online redo log files is NOT the database block size (which is specified by the instance parameter db_block_size). Redo log files are written direct to the OS and use the OS's block size -- which is typically 512bytes.
    Thus, specifying LOG_CHECKPOINT_INTERVAL of, say, 100000 is an instruction to Oracle that "when the current online redo log file is about 50MB (100000 512byte blocks is 48.82125MB) written, issue a Checkpoint to DBWR so that DBWR also writes dirty buffers to disk". That way, every checkpoint interval is actually smaller than the actual online redo log file (a checkpoint will still be issued when the online redo log file is full and a switch logfile occcurs).
    Hemant K Chitale

  • Automatic checkpoint tuning in 10g?

    Does anyone have an idea with the following sentence?
    Automatic checkpoint tuning is enabled when FAST_START_MTTR_TARGET is not explicitly set to zero.
    I think the incremental checkpoint event was introduced in 9i...But I saw this automatic checkpoint tuning feature in the 10g OTN doc. what's new?
    Anyway!! we need to set this parameter with a non-zero value to use the incremental checkpoint event though.

    hi,
    Since Oracle 9i FAST_START_MTTR_TARGET parameter is the preferred method
    of tuning incremental checkpoint target. FAST_START_MTTR_TARGET enables you to specify the number of seconds the database takes to perform crash recovery of a single instance. Based on internal statistics, incremental checkpoint
    automatically adjusts the checkpoint target to meet the requirement of
    FAST_START_MTTR_TARGET.
    V$INSTANCE_RECOVERY.ESTIMATED_MTTR shows the current estimated mean time to
    recover (MTTR) in seconds. This value is shown even if FAST_START_MTTR_TARGET
    is not specified.
    V$INSTANCE_RECOVERY.TARGET_MTTR shows the effective MTTR target in seconds
    enforced by the system.
    V$MTTR_TARGET_ADVICE shows the number of I/Os resulted by the current workload
    under the current MTTR setting and the estimated number of I/Os that would be
    resulted by the current workload under other MTTR settings.
    so I would recommend you run this sql to find out what the system thinks your MTTR_TARGET should be.
    If FAST_START_MTTR_TARGET is specified, LOG_CHECKPOINT_INTERVAL should not
    be set or set to 0.
    rgds
    alan

  • "physical writes non checkpoint" is low, but increase redo doesn't help.

    We have a very busy database, the physical write is so high that we want to reduce the physical write. From the statspack, we could see "physical writes non checkpoint" is low in comparison with "physical write", so I think the physical write resulted from checkpoint is high, then I increased the redo size from 2G to 4G (now the log file switch every 4 minutes). I hope this could reduce the physical write, but the fact is the increased redo is helpless.
    Statistic                                      Total     per Second    per Trans
    physical writes                            8,298,681        9,210.5        249.8
    physical writes non checkpoint             3,229,321        3,584.2         97.2We are using oracle 10.2.0.3 on solaris 10, parameters related to checkpoint are
    fast_start_io_target                          0                 
    fast_start_mttr_target                        0                 
    log_checkpoint_interval                       5000000           
    log_checkpoint_timeout                        0     Thanks,
    Edited by: user646745 on Aug 18, 2009 1:24 AM

    Your log_checkpoint_interval is still at 2.5GB. So, even though you have increased the redo log file sizes, a checkpoint will occur at every 2.5GB of Redo. The rate of checkpointing has moved from "every 2GB of redo" to "every 2.5GB of redo".
    You could set log_checkpoint_interval to 0 to disable the intermediate checkpoints.
    http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/B19306_01/server.102/b14237/initparams109.htm#i1129193
    Note : However, FAST_START_MTTR_TARGET will still cause Incremental Checkpoints.

  • Redolog and checkpoint problems

    Hi!
    We are working on Oracle 10.2.0.3.0 Standard Edition on a Windows 2003 Server platform.
    We are facing the following two problems:
    Problem 1:
    Thread 1 cannot allocate new log, sequence 953
    Checkpoint not complete
    Current log# 4 seq# 952 mem# 0: R:\ORANT\ORADATA\ITBMED4\REDOLOG\REDO04A.LOG
    Current log# 4 seq# 952 mem# 1: S:\ORANT\ORADATA\ITBMED4\REDOLOG\REDO04B.LOG
    Thu Jun 07 07:11:53 2007
    Thread 1 advanced to log sequence 953
    Current log# 1 seq# 953 mem# 0: R:\ORANT\ORADATA\ITBMED4\REDOLOG\REDO01A.LOG
    Current log# 1 seq# 953 mem# 1: S:\ORANT\ORADATA\ITBMED4\REDOLOG\REDO01B.LOG
    The database is not very active and there are 4 redo log files each of 50 MB in size. We have implemented this at several customers but only one customer gets this error.
    After an 'ALTER SYSTEM CHECKPOINT' followed by a log switch, the error disappears from the alert log but then again appears after a few more log switches.
    Other points of concern are that the archived logs are not the same size as the redo logs (before we did the log switch exercise).
    The layout on the server is:
    Disk 1: Oracle installation and data files
    Disk 2: redo log files
    Disk 3: redo log files
    Disk 4: Archived logs
    What is the solution to this problem?
    Problem 2:
    The second problem is that the OS timestamp of the redo log files does not change. It remains the same as the date on which we migrated the database from 8i to 10g.
    Regards,
    Aniruddha

    Yes, I had a look at this Metalink note. I reproduce the relevant information for discussion below:
    This message indicates that Oracle wants to reuse a redo log file, but
    the current checkpoint position is still in that log. In this case, Oracle must
    wait until the checkpoint position passes that log. Because the
    incremental checkpoint target never lags the current log tail by more than 90%
    of the smallest log file size, this situation may be encountered if DBWR writes
    too slowly, or if a log switch happens before the log is completely full,
    or if log file sizes are too small.
    I do not feel that this is related to the size of the log file as we do not get this problem at any other customer which have larger activity. Under what conditions can the log switch happen before the log is completely full other than purposefully switching the log file?

  • Motive of checkpoint and SCN using with DBWr and LOGWr processes ??

    What checkpoint has to do with log writer process i am not getting exactly ?..
    Like see i fire 1 update query and apparently it is generating some redo blocks which in turn will come to my redo log files now in tihs whole cycle where the checkpoint will occur and why??
    1)My update query
    2) take locks
    3)generate redo
    4)generate undo
    5)Blocks are modified but they are still in redo log buffer...
    now this blocks eventually comes to redo log files in this whole way where check pointing take place and why??
    checkpoint also takes place when Datablocks are flushed to datafiles again the same reason why??
    Same way around the same question the what checkpointing has to do with DBWr process also i am not clear...
    Apart from this whole picture SCN is generated when user issue comitts..and we can say SCN can be used to identify that transaction is committed or not.?
    So what is the motive of SCN to update in Control file...MAy b to get the latest transaction committed..??
    Sorry one thread with so much questionss..but this all things are creating a fuzzy picture i want to make it clear thnx for your help in advance ..
    I read documentation but they havent mentioned in depth for checkpointing..??
    THANKS
    Kamesh
    Edited by: 851733 on Apr 12, 2011 7:57 AM

    851733 wrote:
    What checkpoint has to do with log writer process i am not getting exactly ?..And where exactly did you read that it has anything to do with it? How did you come up to the relation anyways? The time checkpointing would come into the play with the log files would be when there would be a log switch and this would induce a checkpoint, causing/triggering the DBWR to write the dirty buffers to the datafile and allowing the redo log group to be reused. That's about it.
    Like see i fire 1 update query and apparently it is generating some redo blocks which in turn will come to my redo log files now in tihs whole cycle where the checkpoint will occur and why??
    1)My update query
    2) take locks
    3)generate redo
    4)generate undo
    5)Blocks are modified but they are still in redo log buffer...
    now this blocks eventually comes to redo log files in this whole way where check pointing take place and why??Read my reply above, at the time of writing the change vectors in the log file, there won't be any checkpointing coming into the picture.
    checkpoint also takes place when Datablocks are flushed to datafiles again the same reason why??Wrong, the checkpoint event would make the dirty buffers written to the dataflile. Please spend some time reading the Backup and Recovery guide and in that, instance recovery section. In order to make sure that there wont be much time spent in the subsequent instance recovery, it would be required to move the dirty buffers periodically to the data file. THis would be caused by the incremental checkpoint . Doing so would constantly write the content out of the buffer cache thus leaving few buffers only as the candidate for the recovery in the case of the instance crash.
    Same way around the same question the what checkpointing has to do with DBWr process also i am not clear...Read the oracle documentation's Concept guide again and again as long as it doesn't start getting in sync in with you(and it may take time). One of the events , when DBWR writes , is the occurance of the Checkpoint. Whenever there would be a checkpoint, the DBWR would be triggered to write the buffers (dirty) to the datafile.
    Apart from this whole picture SCN is generated when user issue comitts..and we can say SCN can be used to identify that transaction is committed or not.? Not precisely since there would be a SCN always there , even when you query , for that too. But yes, with the commit, there would be a commit SCN that would be generated including a commit flag entered in the redo stream telling that the transaction is finally committed. The same entry would be updated in the transcation table as well mentioning that the tranaction is committed and is now over.
    So what is the motive of SCN to update in Control file...MAy b to get the latest transaction committed..??Where did you read it?
    Sorry one thread with so much questionss..but this all things are creating a fuzzy picture i want to make it clear thnx for your help in advance ..
    I read documentation but they havent mentioned in depth for checkpointing..??
    Read the book, Expert one on one by Tom Kyte and also, from documentation, version 11.2's Concept guide. These two would be more than enough to get the basics correct.
    HTH
    Aman....

  • Know more about checkpoint

    checkpoint 分成很多种 full 、file、thread、parallel query、 object 、incremental 、logfile switch
    每一种checkpoint 都有其自身的特性,例如Incremental Checkpoint会要求ckpt 每3s 更新一次controlfile 但是不更新datafile header, 而FULL CHECKPOINT要求立即完成(同步的) 且会同时更新 controlfile 和 datafile header。
    各种checkpoint 的特点见下表:
    Full Checkpoint
    Writes block images to the database for all dirty buffers from all instances
    Statistics updated:
    DBWR checkpoints
    DBWR checkpoint buffers written
    DBWR thread checkpoint buffers written
    Caused by:
    Alter system checkpoint [global]
    Alter database begin backup
    Alter database close
    Shutdown
    Controlfile and datafile headers are updated
    CHECKPOINT_CHANGE#
    Thread Checkpoint
    Writes block images to the database for all dirty buffers from one instance
    Statistics updated:
    DBWR checkpoints
    DBWR checkpoint buffers written
    DBWR thread checkpoint buffers written
    Caused by:
    Alter system checkpoint local
    Controlfile and datafile headers are updated
    CHECKPOINT_CHANGE#
    File Checkpoint
    Writes block images to the database for all dirty buffers for all files of a tablespace from all instances
    Statistics updated:
    DBWR tablespace checkpoint buffers written
    DBWR checkpoint buffers written
    DBWR checkpoints
    Caused by:
    Alter tablespace XXX offline
    Alter tablespace XXX begin backup
    Alter tablespace XXX read only
    Controlfile and datafile headers are updated
    CHECKPOINT_CHANGE#
    Parallel Query Checkpoint
    Writes block images to the database for all dirty buffers belonging to objects accessed by the query from all instances
    Statistics updated:
    DBWR checkpoint buffers written
    DBWR checkpoints
    Caused by:
    Parallel Query
    Parallel Query component of PDML or PDDL
    Mandatory for consistency
    Object “Checkpoint”
    Writes block images to the database for all dirty buffers belonging to an object from all instances
    Statistics updated:
    DBWR object drop buffers written
    DBWR checkpoints
    Caused by:
    Drop table XXX
    Drop table XXX purge
    Truncate table XXX
    Mandatory for media recovery purposes
    Incremental Checkpoint
    Writes the contents of “some” dirty buffers to the database from CKPT-Q
    Block images written in SCN order
    Checkpoint RBA updated in SGA
    Statistics updated:
    DBWR checkpoint buffers written
    Controlfile is updated every 3 seconds by CKPT
    Checkpoint progress record
    Log Switch Checkpoint(8i 以前 LOG switch checkpoint是FULL CHECKPOINT)
    Writes the contents of “some” dirty buffers to the database
    Statistics updated:
    DBWR checkpoints
    DBWR checkpoint buffers written
    background checkpoints started
    background checkpoints completed
    Controlfile and datafile headers are updated
    CHECKPOINT_CHANGE#
    无论是什么类型的checkpoint 检查点 ,所有的本地检查点(CKPT)已类似的本地化方法处理。 每一个实例中所有本地的活跃检查点请求(active local checkpoint request)都保存在一个队列(queue)中,这个队列叫做 Active Checkpoint Queue。 在这个队列(queue)中的每一条记录代表一个本地检查点(local checkpoint request)。 当某一个进程( 可能是前台进程 foreground process --例如前台进程执行“alter tablespace users begin/end backup", 也可能是CKPT 或者其他后台进程) , 这个进程都会将新的 request 记录放到这个Active Checkpoint Queue中。 典型的一个checkpoint request 由 检查点类型checkpoint request type,优先级priority , 以及与该checkpoint request 关联的checkpoint structure, 等待进程 waiter process,  还有其余一些相关的属性如 FILE Checkpoint 的tablespace id、FILE NUMBER、 Object checkpoint的object id 等。
    DBWR进程会不断地扫描这个Active Checkpoint Queue, 并服务于这个Queue上的checkpoint request 检查点请求。 一旦某个request 被完成了,DBWR 将这个request标记为completed 。 CKPT 进程也会不断监控这个 Active Checkpoint Queue 查看是否所有request都被完成了。 当CKPT发觉一个checkpoint request完成了, CKPT会将这个request从 Active Checkpoint Queue中移除。 取决于不同的检查点种类和目的, 当一个本地检查点(local checkpoint)完成,这意味着 某些特定的磁盘上的数据结构被更新,以反映这个检查点完成的物理表现。 这个操作 或者由 直接CKPT完成, 或者由提交checkpoint request的 等待进程直接完成, 或者由CKPT唤醒这个提交checkpoint request的等待进程间接地完成,以上具体由谁来完成操作 取决于检查点种类和目的。

    checkpoint 分成很多种 full 、file、thread、parallel query、 object 、incremental 、logfile switch
    每一种checkpoint 都有其自身的特性,例如Incremental Checkpoint会要求ckpt 每3s 更新一次controlfile 但是不更新datafile header, 而FULL CHECKPOINT要求立即完成(同步的) 且会同时更新 controlfile 和 datafile header。
    各种checkpoint 的特点见下表:
    Full Checkpoint
    Writes block images to the database for all dirty buffers from all instances
    Statistics updated:
    DBWR checkpoints
    DBWR checkpoint buffers written
    DBWR thread checkpoint buffers written
    Caused by:
    Alter system checkpoint [global]
    Alter database begin backup
    Alter database close
    Shutdown
    Controlfile and datafile headers are updated
    CHECKPOINT_CHANGE#
    Thread Checkpoint
    Writes block images to the database for all dirty buffers from one instance
    Statistics updated:
    DBWR checkpoints
    DBWR checkpoint buffers written
    DBWR thread checkpoint buffers written
    Caused by:
    Alter system checkpoint local
    Controlfile and datafile headers are updated
    CHECKPOINT_CHANGE#
    File Checkpoint
    Writes block images to the database for all dirty buffers for all files of a tablespace from all instances
    Statistics updated:
    DBWR tablespace checkpoint buffers written
    DBWR checkpoint buffers written
    DBWR checkpoints
    Caused by:
    Alter tablespace XXX offline
    Alter tablespace XXX begin backup
    Alter tablespace XXX read only
    Controlfile and datafile headers are updated
    CHECKPOINT_CHANGE#
    Parallel Query Checkpoint
    Writes block images to the database for all dirty buffers belonging to objects accessed by the query from all instances
    Statistics updated:
    DBWR checkpoint buffers written
    DBWR checkpoints
    Caused by:
    Parallel Query
    Parallel Query component of PDML or PDDL
    Mandatory for consistency
    Object “Checkpoint”
    Writes block images to the database for all dirty buffers belonging to an object from all instances
    Statistics updated:
    DBWR object drop buffers written
    DBWR checkpoints
    Caused by:
    Drop table XXX
    Drop table XXX purge
    Truncate table XXX
    Mandatory for media recovery purposes
    Incremental Checkpoint
    Writes the contents of “some” dirty buffers to the database from CKPT-Q
    Block images written in SCN order
    Checkpoint RBA updated in SGA
    Statistics updated:
    DBWR checkpoint buffers written
    Controlfile is updated every 3 seconds by CKPT
    Checkpoint progress record
    Log Switch Checkpoint(8i 以前 LOG switch checkpoint是FULL CHECKPOINT)
    Writes the contents of “some” dirty buffers to the database
    Statistics updated:
    DBWR checkpoints
    DBWR checkpoint buffers written
    background checkpoints started
    background checkpoints completed
    Controlfile and datafile headers are updated
    CHECKPOINT_CHANGE#
    无论是什么类型的checkpoint 检查点 ,所有的本地检查点(CKPT)已类似的本地化方法处理。 每一个实例中所有本地的活跃检查点请求(active local checkpoint request)都保存在一个队列(queue)中,这个队列叫做 Active Checkpoint Queue。 在这个队列(queue)中的每一条记录代表一个本地检查点(local checkpoint request)。 当某一个进程( 可能是前台进程 foreground process --例如前台进程执行“alter tablespace users begin/end backup", 也可能是CKPT 或者其他后台进程) , 这个进程都会将新的 request 记录放到这个Active Checkpoint Queue中。 典型的一个checkpoint request 由 检查点类型checkpoint request type,优先级priority , 以及与该checkpoint request 关联的checkpoint structure, 等待进程 waiter process,  还有其余一些相关的属性如 FILE Checkpoint 的tablespace id、FILE NUMBER、 Object checkpoint的object id 等。
    DBWR进程会不断地扫描这个Active Checkpoint Queue, 并服务于这个Queue上的checkpoint request 检查点请求。 一旦某个request 被完成了,DBWR 将这个request标记为completed 。 CKPT 进程也会不断监控这个 Active Checkpoint Queue 查看是否所有request都被完成了。 当CKPT发觉一个checkpoint request完成了, CKPT会将这个request从 Active Checkpoint Queue中移除。 取决于不同的检查点种类和目的, 当一个本地检查点(local checkpoint)完成,这意味着 某些特定的磁盘上的数据结构被更新,以反映这个检查点完成的物理表现。 这个操作 或者由 直接CKPT完成, 或者由提交checkpoint request的 等待进程直接完成, 或者由CKPT唤醒这个提交checkpoint request的等待进程间接地完成,以上具体由谁来完成操作 取决于检查点种类和目的。

Maybe you are looking for

  • Calendar dropped from Calendars regularly with ios6

    I have multiple exchange calendars linked to the iPhone Calendars.  Once I upgraded to ios6, one of calendars is regularly (multiple times a day) dropped from being displayed.  When this happens, I need to select the "Calendar" button in the upper le

  • PDF/X-1a:2001出力データが重くなった

    Mac OSX ver10.6.8でinDesign CC ver.9.2を使っています. 制作物の第2版を作ってPDF/X-1a:2001出力したところ.今年6月に入稿した初版のデータサイズの2倍強のデータとなってしまいました.変更点はテキストのみです. おかしいと思い.初版のデータをPDF/X-1a:2001で出力し直してみたら.やはりデータサイズが大きくなっています. どうしてでしょう. その期間にやったことといえば.Acrobat11proを体験版でインストールしてみたことぐらいです.現

  • How to read the source table using a dblink in oracle

    Hi, I want to read data from a source table which I can access using dblink in the datawarehouse. I tried different things in DI and I don't know how to do that? Can any one help me on this? Thanks, Gowri

  • 5530 Xpress Music Hanging, wont start up

    My 5530 Xpress Music does not start anymore, It just hangs when i start it ..  Just shows as White screen with Blue Nokia Logo on it ..  and does not go on and continue booting Tried removing the battery,sim, etc Donno what to do.   The manual does n

  • MacBook Pro Mouse Problem

    The mouse on my MacBook Pro has recently become quite unresponsive. The trackpad works fine, but clicking by pressing on the pad and the ability to click and drag is almost completely non-functional. It doesn't seem to matter how hard I press on the