Infopath does not default yes/no field value.

More infopath issues.
I have 2 yes/no fields in a SharePoint list. In infopath, the fields are defined to default to FALSE. When i attempt to add a new row or edit an existing row, infopath throws an error
The form cannot be submitted because it contains validation errors.
So basically, Infopath does not default the value as defined in the form, and then throws an error because it didn't default it. I tried setting the value in the form in a rule if it's not TRUE or FALSE but this also does not work. Tried setting
the value to "false" also but again, it does not execute the rule as instructed. The error says only "true" or "false" are permitted but infopath provides "TRUE" and "FALSE" as the options on the box.
Infopath needs to decide on what it wants!
In addition, Infopath changed the definition of my field to default to "YES" when I had it defaulting to "NO".
I think the problem is that infopath has the wrong idea. SharePoint uses "YES/NO" as values while infopath thinks YES=TRUE and NO=FALSE. Pretty stupid eh.
One question... IS INFOPATH A RECOMMENDED OPTION FOR SHAREPOINT????? MY GUESS: NO WAY!!! This tool is a complete piece of junk!

Hello Roland and jd,
I've the same issue here with InfoPath 2010 (international version of MS Office Professional Plus Version 14.0.7015.1000 (32-bit) - but set to English language).
The property of a check box only offers (Blank), TRUE, FALSE, 1, 0 for data type "True/False (boolean)".
TRUE and FALSE are not accepted at "Form Submit" - this is due to a built-in check, not a validation rule.
I tried to set the boolean field with a rule to either "true" or "false" just before submit - the rule action dialog does not check the data type like the check box but provides an empty text field. However, this does
NOT solve the issue!!
I can avoid the hassle with a text field which I assign "TRUE" and "FALSE".
The boolean field is not used as SharePoint property, so this is definitly a problem of Infopath 2010.
Any ideas? Suggestions?

Similar Messages

Error the entered value does not match the specified field type

Hi,
When I try to insert a null value to a field of the User Defined Table I am getting the error "The entered value does not match the specified field type" in SAP Business One version 2007 PL 42.
Any help would be appreciated.
Thanks in advance.
Sudha.

Hi Sudha,
It probably have to do with how you defined the field.
Is Null value allowed?
What are the field definitions?
Thanks,
Jesper

Import parameter to method does not default when executed

Hi Everybody...i have a method with import parameter IV_DATE type SY-DATUM default SY-DATUM.
When i execute the method the system date does not default...the IV_DATE field is blank(Spaces). Is there anybody that can help. This is very strange.
Thanks in advance.

Hi,
I created a custom class and used date as exporting parameter
I am able to get the date value. Please see screen shot for reference.
Regards,
Rafi

BI Publisher Word Template The report does not contain any data fields.

I have OBIEE BI Publisher report (10.3.4) working fine using BIP but using MS Word 2003 I want to create new template and want to add charts etc.
Step 1. In MS Word I successfully login Oracle BI Publisher as Administrator
2. Oracle BI Publisher -> Open (I open the report)
3. Go to Insert -> Table Wizard
I get this error:
The report does not contain any data fields. Please make sure that the reports generates data with the default settings or provide a valid XML file.
Please help

Hi
How do I load XML data? Also why XML data load is required? Do I have to export XML data from BIP View screen and load from the same file from the word?
Please clarify
Thanks

Field ZZBUDAT is delta-relevant, but does not exist in the field list

Hi All,
I have created a Generic DataSource on a View.Now there is a situation ,i need to add a Date field form some other table.
So i have enhanced the datasource now that date is coming in my datasource.
But when i tried to make delta on that date field its showing error-
Field ZZBUDAT is delta-relevant, but does not exist in the field list
Message no. R8279
Diagnosis
The DataSource uses field ZZBUDAT for specifying the delta. In the DataSource field list, however, the field does not occur
Now how i can make this field dalta relevant?
Thanks,
Piyush

Piyush,
I think the message in SAP is quite clear....
If the field ZZBUDAT does not exist in the view ... how do you expect the datasource to know which records have changed...?
The delta relevant field SHOULD be in the view - else there is no way the extractor can identify the changed records ...
Please remember that the Generic extractor is a simple select statement with a where clause on the delta relevant field and nothing else ... if you want the changed on field to come from another table - then you need to write a function module extractor to do this...
The order of processing is that - the view fields are processed first - then the enhanced fields are processed followed by the user exits...

HS.EXP does not take into account the Value member and the source

Hello,
The formula is put in the "Entity Curr Adjs" part of the Sub Calculate.
The expression is the following and apply for one entity (Holding method) I filtered previously and the ICP Entity has proportionnal method with 50% rate:
HS.Exp "A#5420.I#[ICP None].C1#REC.C2#[None].C3#[None].C4#Recla_IAS_Aut_RetS_5=
A#5340.V#[Contribution].E#Logista_E_TBCO.I#UTE_O.C1#CLO.C2#TotC2.C3#TotC3.C4#TotC4"
The data I would like to retrieve is the one in Contribution Value as I put on the source part of the expression.
And yet, the data I get is the one of the Entity Currency and Proportion Value, which is different because the ICP has proportionnal method (50%) and the Contribution value is the result of Proportion - Elimination values.
To sum up: I obtain a data of 50 instead of 25.
I checked that the data I see in my form corresponds to the source parameters but it seems that it does not take into account the Value parameter.
Could it be that it is not possible to use a Contribution Value source for an Entity Currency Adjs destination?
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Julien

Hi,
I see another problem in what you're trying to do. First, let me state what you're trying to establish: you are trying to get a value from one entity (say A) to another entity (say B), be it at [Proportion], [Elimination], [Contribution], ...
My question is: how can you know that during the consolidation process, by the time your code runs on B, A has already been processed and [Proportion], [Elimination] are not empty (or contain values from a previous consolidation run)?
The answer is "You don't". Theoretically, you have no control as per the order in which entities are calculated/consolidated during the process. Even more complex is the thing that if you have a multi-core machine, more than one entities may run in parallel, but still you cannot force A to run before B. I have done some tests and I've seen that in a one processor setting the order that entities enter in the process of consolidation matches the order you have placed them in the consolidation tree in metadata. Still this thing is not documented as far as I know and therefore you cannot rely on this.
Finally, I have also seen that in a simple case (B pulls from A), if you run consolidation twice, then you definitely get correct values. By the time you make a change in A, you have to run consolidation twice again to make sure that you get the correct data. I believe that you see that what I'm describing is good for experimenting but not for releasing to a client.
I tend to think of such a design, as a practice to avoid.
--Kostas

Valdiation rule does not work on PrimaryBillToCity field

Hello to everyone,
Valdiation rule does not work on PrimaryBillToCity field (and other address fields)
Have someone a workaround ?
Thanks.
ML

I do not believe it is possible to do validation on the address fields in the address block.

InfoObject does not default to "C" on the variable entry scre

Hello Guys,
In my workbooks the InfoObject does not default to "C" on the variable entry screen, even though the variable is set to do so.
Does some one know the reason.
help me.
Thanks in advance
Issue sent to SAP Waldorf
Edited by: rama devi on Apr 2, 2008 5:13 PM

Thanks for the advice.
The problem is some times its working and sometime its not working.
so dont know what to do. thats why issue sent to SAP Waldorf

Field catalog does not agree with the fields of the functional area

G'day everyone,
I am using a generic extractor via infoset to extract data from R/3 source system.
Using RSA3, I have obtained an error message and no further details.
****ERROR MESSAGE
"Field catalog does not agree with the fields of the functional area
Message no. RSUQ134
****ERROR MESSAGE
I have checked and adjusted my infoset in SQ02 and they seems fine but still obtain the same error.
In BW, replicated the datasource and activate the transfer rules but still obtain the same error.
Anyone knows how to get more details for this type of error? Or how to fix this problem?
Regards
Wayne

I think I have just solved it.
Transaction RS02 delete and recreate after checking the structure in BW and Source system are the same.
Cheers

Cascading LOV does not work when setting the value of the parent LOV with DA

Hello All,
Using APEX 4.2.2.
I have tow LOVs
Parent LOV item is: P50_TYPE
Child LOV item is : P50_PROJECT_ID
In other words in the attributes of the item P50_PROJECT_ID we have :
> Cascading LOV Parent Item(s): P50_TYPE
> Page Items to Submit: P50_TYPE
> List of values definition: something similar to:
Select * from mytable where type = :P50_TYPE
I use DA that execute JS code to set the value of the P50_TYPE item
something similar to:
> $('#P50_TYPE').val(2);
Having done this, the P50_PROJECT_ID item does not get refreshed, when the value of P50_TYPE is changed. Namely, P50_PROJECT_ID remains empty, unless end user manually changes the value of P50_TYPE.
Any help please ?
Regards,

Thanks Scott,
By the way, I remember reading a thread posted by you about Sumneva Drag & Drop Report Region plugin that was answered by Tom . But, I cannot find this plugin anywhere. Does not it supported in APEX 4.2 ? Is there any alternative out there ?
If you use it, and it works find with you, can you please send it to me on [email protected] ?
Regards,
Fateh

Can not set OARG.cstAllcAcc field value with CustomsGroups Object

Can not set OARG.cstAllcAcc field value with CustomsGroups Object, please open this field in this Object because it is a key field related to financial system.

I guess, it should work; instead of html:submit, try with button.

Location(Plant) value does not default in standalone scenario

Hi,
We are running on SRM 5.0(SP11) Standalone scenario.When creating a shopping cart thorugh the link "DESCRIBE REQUIREMENT" i.e. Text based shopping cart,the default value for the field LOCATION does not appear.Also in the dropwdon list,I can see all the local plants defined but when I select one,the value disappears i.e the Location field does not get populated!
Has anyone come across similar problem?If so ,please advise.
All inputs will be highly appreciated.
regards,
SRM tech

Hi Manish,
Thanks for the prompt reply.
I have defined locations in the extended attribute section of the Org strcutre and also marked as default.
The user can also set his default plant by going in 'Settings' when user is logged into web end of SRM.
Basically the problem has 2 sides:
1.No default value comes for the LOCATION field.
2.Although I can see the F4 list ,but when i select an entry for the LOCATION,the value doesnt get populated.
BR,
SRm tech.

Error Message - Value Entered Does Not Match Format of Field

I keep getting an error message in Adobe Pro X: "The value entered does not match the format of the field [JF13]".
I have JF13 programmed as follows:
On Calculate tab:
if(Number(this.getField("ck4").value) > 0) this.getField("JF13").value = Number(this.getField("FL019").value); else this.getField("JF13").value = " ";
It is programmed this way so if the user checks the check box before the field, only then will JF13 populate a value, which pulls from FL019. I also have the settings set to "number" because the data needs to display as a dollar amount $xxx.xx.
FL019 is a hidden field on the form which pulls a dollar amount from a Mainframe, and its settings are also set to "Number" :
I get four pop up windows with the above mentioned error message, and the only way to make the message stop is to remove the "number" format from the fields. However, when this is done, if any number which ends in a zero is entered, it cuts off the zero. This is not acceptable either.
Is there some sort of script I could add or some other way to prevent both the error message and the cutting off of the zero on JF13?
I am not very proficient with javascript, so any assistance would be appreciated!

Thank you so much for your response!!
Forgive me for my lack of knowledge - but where exactly would I add that in the script?
I tried it like this:
if(Number(this.getField("ck4").value) > 0) this.getField("JF13").value = Number(this.getField("FL019").value); else this.getField("JF13").value = ""(empty string);
And I got an error saying I was missing a parenthesis. Should it go somewhere else or am I completely off?

R12 OM Copy does not navigate to required field when OK button is clicked

We are upgrading from 11.5.10 to 12.1.3.
When a user is copying a Sales Order to a Return in 11i and the user leaves the return reason blank, the form will navigate to the return reason and raise ORA-40202 Field must be Entered.
In R12, the navigation to the required field does not happen. The ORA-420202 is still raised, but the user must click through the tabs to find the return reason.
I have examined OEORDCPY.pll and found the procedure OE_ORDER_COPY_WINDOW.action_ok, which is called when the user clicks on the OK button.
The code below is from R12. Only the section for bug 4879216 is new since 11i. It is clear that the intent is for the form to navigate to the line type or return reason when they are missing (null, required, and enabled).
I have attempted to use forms personalization to navigate to the return reason, when it is missing. However, I could not get the desired result using when-new-item-instance or when-button-pressed as the trigger. Anyone have any suggesstions to correct this change in behaviour?
procedure action_ok IS
QUERY_HEADER_ID NUMBER;
BEGIN
/* Added for bug 4879216 */
validate(ITEM_SCOPE);
IF NOT FORM_SUCCESS THEN
raise form_trigger_failure;
END IF;
/* End of bug 4879216 */
OE_Navigate.g_exec_post_forms_commit:='N';
IF get_item_property('COPY.LINE_TYPE',REQUIRED) = 'TRUE' AND
get_item_property('COPY.LINE_TYPE',ENABLED) = 'TRUE' AND
     NAME_IN('COPY.LINE_TYPE') IS NULL THEN
--fnd_message.debug('go line type');
go_item('copy.line_type');
ELSIF get_item_property('COPY.RETURN_REASON',REQUIRED) = 'TRUE' AND
get_item_property('COPY.RETURN_REASON',ENABLED) = 'TRUE' AND
     NAME_IN('COPY.RETURN_REASON') IS NULL THEN
--fnd_message.debug('go return reason');
     go_item('copy.return_reason');
ELSE
--fnd_message.debug('copy');
OE_ORDER_COPY_MAIN.copy_main(QUERY_HEADER_ID);
END IF;
/* OE_ORDER_COPY_GLOBALS.G_HEADER_ID_TO_QUERY := QUERY_HEADER_ID;
hide_window('COPY');
go_block(OE_ORDER_COPY_GLOBALS.G_SOURCE_BLOCK_NAME);
app_special.enable('MODAL',PROPERTY_ON);
app_special.enable('file.save',PROPERTY_ON);
app_special.enable('file.accept',PROPERTY_ON);
END action_ok;

We have obtained a one-off patch from Oracle to address the issue. Is the patch available for public access? If yes, it would be great if you could share the patch number with us.
Thanks,
Hussein

BUPA_ADDRESS_CHANGE does not default saved address dependent communication

Hi,
I have used the function module to update the address dependent communication details. Although I managed to save the changes, I am unable to default the communication details properly.
CALL FUNCTION 'BUPA_ADDRESS_CHANGE'
    EXPORTING
      iv_partner         = p_bpnum
      iv_addrnumber      = p_addnum
      iv_accept_error    = 'X'
      iv_x_save          = 'X'
      iv_change_bas      = 'X'
      iv_check_address   = 'X'
    TABLES
      it_adtel           = p_t_update_tel
      it_adfax           = p_t_update_fax
      it_adsmtp          = p_t_update_email
      it_comrem          = p_et_comrem_upd
      it_addr_comm_use   = p_et_addr_comm_use
      it_adtel_x         = p_t_update_tel_x
      it_adfax_x         = p_t_update_fax_x
      it_adsmt_x         = p_t_update_email_x
      it_comre_x         = p_it_comre_upd_x
      it_addr_comm_use_x = p_it_addr_comm_use_x
      et_return          = et_return.
For example, if i update telephone number, It doesn't set the fields std_no to 'X' and r_3_user to '1'.
Please advise.
Thanks in advance,
Jenson

Jenson,
Those fields must be provided to the BUPA_ADDRESS_CHANGE function module. This function module does not provide any defaults of information and is at a very low level in comparison to the maintenance screens which call the module.
Take care,
Stephen

Infopath does not default yes/no field value.

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for