Initialize Planning Version Query

Hi,
We have an active version 000 for a planning area. Now, we have extra one simulation version which has been created for this. For business reasons, we need to copy the data from 000 to simulation version. Version copy is done successfully, and during this phase, I see this version having been there for the planning area.
Now, immediately after the version copy is done, I have initialized the simulation version-ed planning area. And here, the system has thrown the ABAP run-time error with MESSAGE_TYPE_X, and I no more see the simulation version in the created time series objects.
These two steps are happening as part of a chain.
When I re-initialize the PA with my simulation version manually, the step goes fine........ I believe. I cannot do this for some reasons. But why is that so that the initialize PA step as part of the chain is not working. Is there any wrong in the sequence of steps maintained by me?
Because, in Version copy step, first, the entire data is deleted, and I also see the message saying version <name> is deleted, and then the copying is happening. May be I require some expert light here.
Thanks and Regards,
Gurucharan.

Actually, I am initializing two versions on the same planning area at the same time which is not possible.

Similar Messages

  • How planning version can be intialized?

    How planning version can be intialized?
    Am not getting product and location in /SAPAPO/SDP94
    above error is coming in slection.
    Best luck

    Girish,
    Sounds like you are jumping the gun a bit.  You have to set up DP and SNP before you can use any planning books.
    To initialize a planning version.  /SAPAPO/MSDP_ADMIN.  Your MPOS must already be active.  Then, select your planning area, right click.  If you have no Time Series objects, you will see a menu "Initialize Planning Version".  If you have any time series object, you will instead see "create time series object".  Executing either one of these will initialize the planning version and the planning area.  When you are done, you should have a green light on the Planning Area.
    There are a number of steps besides this one that must be performed before you can use your planning books.  I suggest you take a look at Best Practices Configuration guide, which will describe the necessary steps.
    Demand Planning
    http://help.sap.com/bp_scmv250/BBLibrary/Documentation/DPL_BB_ConfigGuide_EN_DE.doc
    Supply Network Planning
    http://help.sap.com/bp_scmv250/BBLibrary/Documentation/B06_BB_ConfigGuide_EN_DE.doc
    Best Regards,
    DB49

  • Query design question: multiple plan versions in single column

    I have a standard financial statement query with current month "Actual" restricted to Value Type 10 and current month "Plan" using Value Type 20.  This scenario is repeated for year-to-date Actual and Plan along with $ and % variance calculations.   Until recently we were only loading plan version so I had no reason to restrict the plan to version 0 Actual/Plan.
    We are now loading an alternate plan version, Version 1, and I would like to report both versions in the same query.  I though I could just bring in "Version" as a Free Characteristic to easily switch between version 0 and 1 but that didn't work as expected. 
    With "Version" as a filter item my Plan amount will report both plan versions combined which is fine and when "Version" is filtered to the alternate version 1 Plan correctly displays the alternate amount, in both cases Actual is unchanged and displays correctly.   The problem is when I change the filter to just show Version 0 which is defined as "Actual/Plan".  When version 0 is selected the Plan amount displays correctly but ALL Actual values disappear.
    No Version filter set = Actual/Plan and Plan Version 1 combined correctly.   Actual displays correctly.
    Filter set to 1 and 0  = Actual/Plan and Plan Version 1 combined correctly.   Actual displays correctly.
    Filter set to 1 = Plan Version 1 only.  Actual displays correctly.
    Filter set to 0 = Plan Version 0 only.  No actual data is displayed.
    Is there a better way of displaying multiple plan versions in a query or will I have to add additional columns for each plan version?
    Thanks for the ideas,
    Jeff

    Thanks Amit that was the help I needed.
    I added "Version" to every actual Key Figure and made each a Constant Selection.  I also added Version as a Free Characteristic of the query for a filter.
    By adding Version to each Key Figure no matter which plan version I select in the Version filter Actual data alway remains correct and just my Plan column changes to show the plan version I selected.
    Thanks for your help,
    Jeff
    Edited by: Jeff Mayfield on Nov 11, 2009 11:51 PM

  • Query to compare different Plan versions in CCA

    My requirement is to create a Cost Center query that compares two different plan versions, selected by the user with different time periods. We do not use any SEM functionality and are in version 3.0B.
    There is a standard R3 report but this gives a total figure and does not split the figures by periods.
    Does anyone know a Business Content query that can resolve this issue?

    Hi ,
    Instead of going for a business content query u can go for a formula variable using replacement path and assign the required values for the output and in that by using the customer exit with the help of abapers
    Hope this will be a clear solution to ur problem
    Pls assign full points if answer is satisfied
    Regards ,
    Subash Balakrishann

  • Actual and Plan Versions annual view - Multiple versions per company code

    Good Day,
    Iu2019m creating an FI-CO query with an annual view of both Actuals and Plan Values, which uses period and version as input values. The dilemma is around the plan versions which are hardcoded per company codes (eg. 1 Company Code = versions 501 u2013 512)
    Can anyone suggest a possible solutions as normally there is only one version used for planning but in this instance there are multiple versions per Company Code.
    Currently the report is hardcoded for one Company Code and going forward it should cater for more than one(Company Company* 12 Version)
    Kind Regards

    Remove restriction on comp code. There could be 2 models.
    1. Include comp code, value type and version in the rows. This way you get multiple records for a comp code. One record for actual data and one record each for plan versions. To have this model at the query, the data model in the cube also should be in this way (what we call as the account model), multiple records differentiated into actual/plan by valuetype and different versions by version.
    2. Include comp code in rows. Create selections, one for actuals (restrict with key fig and value type 10, actuals), one for each plan versions (restrict key fig with value type 20, version 501. Create one selection for each version this way). This way we have one record per comp code with diff key fig for actual and plan versions. We call this as key fig model. To have this model at the query, the data model in the cube could be account model or key fig model. If it is key fig model then no need of selections. The key fig could be taken directly from the cube.

  • Explain plan for query

    HI all
    Please help to evaluate the explian plan for query suppose the following is the plan
    | Id  | Operation                        | Name             | Rows  | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time     |
    |   0 | SELECT STATEMENT                 |                  |     7 |  1260 |   303   (1)| 00:00:04 |
    |   1 |  SORT ORDER BY                   |                  |     7 |  1260 |   303   (1)| 00:00:04 |
    |*  2 |   FILTER                         |                  |       |       |            |          |
    |   3 |    NESTED LOOPS                  |                  |       |       |            |          |
    |   4 |     NESTED LOOPS                 |                  |     7 |  1260 |   302   (1)| 00:00:04 |
    |   5 |      NESTED LOOPS                |                  |     7 |   791 |   281   (1)| 00:00:04 |
    PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT                                                                                      
    |*  6 |       TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| TASKDETAIL       |     7 |   574 |   267   (1)| 00:00:04 |
    |*  7 |        INDEX SKIP SCAN           | IDX_TD_TTS       |  2726 |       |    29   (0)| 00:00:01 |
    |*  8 |       TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| ORDERS           |     1 |    31 |     2   (0)| 00:00:01 |
    |*  9 |        INDEX UNIQUE SCAN         | PK_SYS_C004711   |     1 |       |     1   (0)| 00:00:01 |
    |* 10 |      INDEX RANGE SCAN            | TEPS_PICK_INDEX1 |     1 |       |     2   (0)| 00:00:01 |
    |* 11 |     TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID  | TASK_PICK_EPS    |     1 |    67 |     3   (0)| 00:00:01 |
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------1. what are the columns rows ,bytes,cost ,time indicate us

    The current 11.2 version of the documentation (URL below) would be better than the 9.2 version
    http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E11882_01/server.112/e16638/ex_plan.htm#i19260
    "Rows" is the expected number of rows that will be returned by that step of the plan
    "Bytes" is the expected size of the result set returned by that step of the plan
    "Time" is the expected execution time --- this can be grossly off because Oracle uses some assumptions about singe block read time, multiblock read time and CPU speed.
    Hemant K Chitale
    Edited by: Hemant K Chitale on Sep 25, 2012 3:04 PM

  • Planning Areas - No initialized Planning Version(s) exists

    Hi,
    Recently our SCM system was upgraded from SCM 4.0 system to SCM 5.0. After the upgrade I find in /sapapo/msdp_admin the planning areas in status red with message "No initialized Planning Version(s) exists". If I check the planning area it says "No errors found when checking the planning area".
    Please help. How to initialize a planning version. I am new to SCM.
    with regards,
    Mohan.

    Hi,
    Thanks Mikhail.
    When I try to Create Time Series Objects for a Planning Area from /sapapo/msdp_admin
    I get the error "Master planning object structure 9ADPBAS is inactive".
    Then I tried to activate the planning object structure 9ADPBAS from /sapapo/msdp_admin but I get "Error occured during activation". I do not find any log also. The long text shows as below.
    =============================
    Error occured during activation (see log)
    Message no. /SAPAPO/TSM154
    Diagnosis
    An error ocurred during activation.
    The planning object structure has not been activated.
    Procedure
    For detailed information, see the corresponding log; a log is only created if logging has been switched on. You switch on the application log from the main screen for editing planning object structures under Extras -> Log on/off.
    =============================
    ow to activate these structures and also how to activate the log for it ?
    Please help,
    with regards,
    Mohan

  • Sample of plan version customer exit code

    Hi! We have a requirement for Forecast accuracy report to be able to report comparison of current actual v current month forecast and
    forecast 1 month ago, forecast 2 months 2 up to 12 months ago. I'm using Calculated/Restricted Key figures with variables "0FISCYEAR & and 0P_FYEAR" with offset and plan version variable 0VERSION & OP_VERS3 but not restricted. The offset for period/year works but not sure how to link it to a plan version specific to period/year. We don't want the variable for plan version to be fixed. We would like to pull the values of the Cal./Rest key figures for period/year and specific version. In our case, we use versions 1, 2, 3 up to 12 for 2010, and version 1 represents 01/2010 forecast/plan version, version 2 is 02/2010 up to 12/2010 version 12. And for 2011, we use versions 101, 102, 103 up to 112. 101 is version specific for 01/2011, 102 for 02/2011 up to 112 for 12/2011.  Same thing for FY 2012, our versions are 201 (representing version for 02/2012) , 202, 203 up to 212.  We have the same pattern of versions for 2020 as well (starts from 01 to 12; 101 to 112; 201 to 212 up to 901 to 912).
    We would like to be able display the values for 12 rolling months for the version specific to period and year as mentioned above.
    Example - in the query, I enter period/ year "03/2011" and version 103 (which represents the version for 03/2011). The result of the query should show up the following CKF/RKF columns:
    1. Current Actual 03/2011
    2. Current Forecast 03/2011 version 103
    3. Forecast 1 month ago 02/2011 version 102
    4. Forecast 2 months ago 01/2011 version 101
    5. Forecast 3 months ago 12/2010 version 12
    6. Forecast 4 months ago 11/2010 version 11
    7. Forecast 5 months ago 10/2010 version 10
    8. Forecast 6 months ago 09/2010 version 09 up to forecast 12 months ago version 03.
    I think we will need a short coding/customer exit for variable version but donu2019t know what needs to be done if using enhancement.  I created a variable customer exit for plan version "ZVAR_MULTIVERSION_EXIT".  Type of variable is characteristic value, processing type is customer exit, reference characteristic is "0VERSION", other basic settings - multiple values and optional.  Please advise if anything I need to change on the settings for plan version variable.  Then my next question is how to code this scenario or maybe you can provide a sample abap code and how to link the customer exit to the "ZVAR_MULTIVERSION_EXIT" plan version variable.   Please advise and greatly appreciate any help and input you can provide.
    Thanks a lot in advance for your help.
    Ching

    Hi,
    Write the code as follows, it will solve your requirement:
    "Declare work area WA_RANGE with type same as I_T_VAR_RANGE.
    when 'variable_name'.
         IF i_step = 1.
              REFRESH e_t_range.
              data: v_date type sy-datum.
              data: v_mon type I length 2.
              data: v_year type I length 4.
              data: v_month type /bi0/oicalmonth.
              v_date = sy-datum.
              v_mon = v_date+4(2).
              v_year = v_date+0(4).
              v_year = v_year - 1. "Previous Year
              concatenate v_year v_mon into v_month.
              WA_RANGE-SIGN = 'I'.
              WA_RANGE-OPT = 'EQ'.
              WA_RANGE-LOW = v_month.
              append wa_range to e_t_range.
         ENDIF.
    Hope this helps.
    Regards,
    Joe
    Edited by: lazarus_joey on Feb 17, 2012 7:04 PM

  • Tcode KEFC and message:"Plan version is not supported"

    Hello all,
    Please is someone aware of solution for this situation:
    - I upload with tcode KEFC forecast datas from excel file in CO-PA
    - receiver records are created with errors
    - when I check for the errors system tells me that "Plan version is not supported, diagnosis : Plan version "0" has not been created in operating concern "1000", Procedure: Transfer version "0" to operating concern "1000" and maintain the attrributes for that version"
    - my concern is that when I check in customizing Planning, Initial Step: display view settings in operating concern details the version "0" is existingin the operati,ng concern "1000"
    So do you have a solution for this issue?
    Thanks and best regards
    JCO

    Hi Sudhakar,
    Thanks for answer but version "0" is tickled for Plan Actual, WIP and variance and I don't understand what to do about KEPM.
    Best regards
    JCO

  • Diff: Version on workflow builder and Maintain Active Plan version on SWU3

    Group,
    Can any one help me to understand the Version on workflow builder and Maintain Active Plan version on SWU3
    Thanks in advance !
    Richard A

    Dear Richard Antony,
    The Versioning in the Workflow is very important its some what simmilar to the version on any SAP Objets like Tables, Program etc.
    Here Suppose any change comes in working workflow, then in stead of directly change them you can create a version of them and them modify it. So that you can reverst back to that version if required.
    Like wise there is lots of importance of versioning Workflow.
    The Active Plan version is also important to establish at SWU3. As all the Workflow is using Organization management which is very depended on the Active Plan version. so based on which Plan version you want to use you can Provide in SWU3 to tell Workflow system to use this.
    Hope this will give you a clear picture.
    Regards,
    Chandrashekhar.

  • "Open in Smart View" option. Hyperion Planning version 11.1.1.3

    Failure to download planning form to Smart View using the "Open in Smart View" option. Hyperion Planning version 11.1.1.3. Error message "Web launch operation has been cancelled.
    Your feedback is appreciated.

    I understand you are on 11.1.1.3.
    However, this is documented in the Known Issues section of the Smart View 11.1.2.1 readme and could be worth a try: 
    When you try to open a Planning web form in Smart View through Workspace, you may get this error: “Web launch operation has been cancelled.” This happens if Essbase has not been added as a server in Shared Connections. Workaround: Open the Smart View Panel in Smart View and add an Essbase server as described in the online help or "Adding Essbase Servers" in chapter 2 of the Smart View User's Guide. 
    HTH-
    Jasmine.

  • Taking long time to initialize planning area.

    Hi All,
    Few questions on initalizing planning are. We have about 500000 CVC and 8 millions records in it.  We have recently upgradd to SCM 7.0. I am noticing now that every time we run background job to create CVC and initialize planning are, I noticed that hob SAPAPO/TS_PAREA_INITILIZE is taking lont time about 1.5 hours . Dont know why is it something to do with Memory or can we do any setting to improve performance.
    Also please advice if we have to initialize planning area every time we create CVC'c or Realignment. Or just during month end job.
    Thanks
    KV
    Edited by: KVerma on Oct 30, 2009 5:22 PM

    Hi KV,
    1)  Housekeeping of your existing data by archiving or deleting unwanted
    data and keep your system free from all inconsistencies could be your
    primary solution to resolve this issue
    2) To keep the size of time series objects to a manageable minimum it makes
    sense to initialize planning areas by scheduling background jobs that run
    periodically. This is sometimes known as working with rolling horizons.
    3) If you want the system to roll over periodically without scheduling the
    same job repeatedly, you should use selection variables to enter relative dates.
    The system then calculates the start and end dates each time the report is
    executed. For instance, you specify that the initialization period should be
    from 12 months in the past to 12 months in the future. If todayu2019s date is
    July 1, 2003, this means that the initialization period starts on July 1, 2002
    and ends on June 30, 2004. If the report is started anew on August 1, 2003,
    change the dates to August 1, 2002 and July 31, 2004.
    Regards
    R. Senthil Mareeswaran.

  • Error While Deleting Planning Version

    Hello to all!
    We have problem with deleting planning versions:
    1. When i try to delete planning version, i recieve ABAP Dump with CONNE_IMPORT_WRONG_OBJECT_TYPE so i can't delete any planning versions in my system
    2.Then when i try to access properties of plannining version appers the message that liveCache is not avaliable
    3. In addition when i try to delete whole model it deletes it but when i refresh the screen i see model which i have already deleted
    Please help me to solve this problems.
    Thanks in advance!!

    Hello Brian!
    Look through  this note https://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/781817
    You should delete variant in transaction SE38 (but i dont remember what variant (but this is one of the variant in this note) exactly you should delete so try it yourself.)
    Also it maybe useful to look through this note https://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/752838

  • Inspection lot creation based on "right" inspection plan version

    I manage inspection plan ( inspection lot origin 01 ) with Change number; in this way I have differents inspection plan version based on date.
    When I do a Good Entry based on purchase order , I need that system creates inspection lot version based on the purchase order creation date and not , as now, based on good entry date
    Is it possible ?
    When I create the purchase order I send to vendor also the inspection plan characteristich that have to be maintened ; for this reason I need to find same characterist during good entry inspection
    Regards
    Silly

    You need to use one of the enhancements that Do-Wook has suggested.  There is no standard SAP way to suppress the inspection based on the vendor batch number.
    With the first enhancement you use the system to check for a previously received vendor batch and if one is found, then that batch number is proposed and not the next one from the numbering series.  In this case, the lot isn't created than due to the inspection lot control of the inspection type.
    With the second enhancement you check the vendor batch number and if it's been received you suppress the inspection lot creation and the stock goes right to unrestricted.
    You'll probably need to do one or the other.  Myself, I prefer the first enhancement.
    Craig

  • Error during creation of  Planning Version in SAP - ICH

    Hi All,
    I'm working on SAP-ICH, in that i tried to create planning version after creating the planning model but the system is giving information " General error in model/planning version management " . Could you please tell me the reason why this is happening and how to rectify the problem.
    Thanking U all in advance.
    Yashu Vyas.

    Hi Vashu
      My name is Vinod Tiwari.I am a SAP Technical Consultant with 4 years of exp in ABAP.Now i have a interest in SCM ICH 5.0.Could you pls guide me whats the way to start learning this.
    Mo mobile no is +919899119182.
    u can mail me ur valuable suggestion on my mailid [email protected]
    Waiting for your reply.
    Thanks and Regards
    Vinod Tiwari

Maybe you are looking for