Inserting into a table which is created "on the fly" from a trigger

Hello all,
I am trying to insert into a table from a trigger in Oracle form. The table name however, is inputted by the user in am item form.
here is what the insert looks like:
insert into :table_name
values (:value1, :value2);
the problem is that forms does not recognize ::table_name. If I replace :table_name with an actual database table, it works fine. However, I need to insert to a table_name based from oracle form item.
By the way, the table|_name is built on the fly using a procedure before I try to insert into it.
Any suggestion on how can I do that? My code in the trigger is:
declare
dm_drop_tbl(:table_name,'table) // a call to an external procedure to drop the table
dm_create_tbl(:table_name,'att1','att2');
insert into :table_name
values (:value1, :value2);
this give me an error:
encounter "" when the symbol expecting one.....

Hi ,
You should use the FORMS_DDL built_in procedure. Read the on-line documentation of forms ...
Simon

Similar Messages

Problem while inserting into a table which has ManyToOne relation

Problem while inserting into a table *(Files)* which has ManyToOne relation with another table *(Folder)* involving a attribute both in primary key as well as in foreign key in JPA 1.0.
Relevent Code
Entities:
public class Files implements Serializable {
@EmbeddedId
protected FilesPK filesPK;
private String filename;
@JoinColumns({
@JoinColumn(name = "folder_id", referencedColumnName = "folder_id"),
@JoinColumn(name = "uid", referencedColumnName = "uid", insertable = false, updatable = false)})
@ManyToOne(optional = false)
private Folders folders;
public class FilesPK implements Serializable {
private int fileId;
private int uid;
public class Folders implements Serializable {
@EmbeddedId
protected FoldersPK foldersPK;
private String folderName;
@OneToMany(cascade = CascadeType.ALL, mappedBy = "folders")
private Collection<Files> filesCollection;
@JoinColumn(name = "uid", referencedColumnName = "uid", insertable = false, updatable = false)
@ManyToOne(optional = false)
private Users users;
public class FoldersPK implements Serializable {
private int folderId;
private int uid;
public class Users implements Serializable {
@Id
@GeneratedValue(strategy = GenerationType.IDENTITY)
private Integer uid;
private String username;
@OneToMany(cascade = CascadeType.ALL, mappedBy = "users")
private Collection<Folders> foldersCollection;
I left out @Basic & @Column annotations for sake of less code.
EJB method
public void insertFile(String fileName, int folderID, int uid){
FilesPK pk = new FilesPK();
pk.setUid(uid);
Files file = new Files();
file.setFilename(fileName);
file.setFilesPK(pk);
FoldersPK folderPk = new FoldersPK(folderID, uid);
// My understanding that it should automatically handle folderId in files table,
// but it is not…
file.setFolders(em.find(Folders.class, folderPk));
em.persist(file);
It is giving error:
Internal Exception: java.sql.SQLException: Field 'folderid' doesn't have a default value_
Error Code: 1364
Call: INSERT INTO files (filename, uid, fileid) VALUES (?, ?, ?)_
_ bind => [hello.txt, 1, 0]_
It is not even considering folderId while inserting into db.
However it works fine when I add folderId variable in Files entity and changed insertFile like this:
public void insertFile(String fileName, int folderID, int uid){
FilesPK pk = new FilesPK();
pk.setUid(uid);
Files file = new Files();
file.setFilename(fileName);
file.setFilesPK(pk);
file.setFolderId(folderId) // added line
FoldersPK folderPk = new FoldersPK(folderID, uid);
file.setFolders(em.find(Folders.class, folderPk));
em.persist(file);
My question is that is this behavior expected or it is a bug.
Is it required to add "column_name" variable separately even when an entity has reference to ManyToOne mapping foreign Entity ?
I used Mysql 5.1 for database, then generate entities using toplink, JPA 1.0, glassfish v2.1.
I've also tested this using eclipselink and got same error.
Please provide some pointers.
Thanks

Hello,
What version of EclipseLink did you try? This looks like bug https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=280436 that was fixed in EclipseLink 2.0, so please try a later version.
You can also try working around the problem by making both fields writable through the reference mapping.
Best Regards,
Chris

How to Get data into I_ table which is Created dynamically

Hi Guys ,
I created one dynamic internal table , now I am want to display same internal table in my ALV? , how can I populate data into this internal table from my internal table based on some condition.
My Requirement is?
I have to display like this
1.This is my heading (field_cat of my ALV in which pack size may varry based on the flavor).
Plant flavor pack_size1----
pack_size-n
2. I have internal table( itab2) with all the pack-sizes and plant details.
3. how can I pass the these data into (itab1) which going to display in ALV ?
I can loop at itab2.
How to pass this data into itab1 relevent fields ?
Looking for Val. Inputs
With Best Regards
Prabhu
TC-Team SAP
Pepsi India
[email protected]

Hi,
This is a code snippet.
    DATA: r_dyn_table      TYPE REF TO data,
          r_wa_dyn_table   TYPE REF TO data,
          l_fields_table type SOI_FIELDS_TABLE.
    FIELD-SYMBOLS: <t_dyn_table>    TYPE STANDARD TABLE,
                   <wa_dyn_table>   TYPE ANY,
                   <w_field1>        TYPE ANY,
                   <w_field2>        TYPE ANY.
    DATA: l_oref_structure TYPE REF TO cl_abap_structdescr,
          l_abap_compdescr type abap_compdescr.
    data: check1 type i,
          check2 type i,
          l_range(20).
    r_dyn_table = IL_DYNDATA-r_dyn_table.
    ASSIGN r_dyn_table->* TO <t_dyn_table>.
    CREATE DATA r_wa_dyn_table LIKE LINE OF <t_dyn_table>.
    ASSIGN r_wa_dyn_table->* TO <wa_dyn_table>.
    l_oref_structure ?= cl_abap_typedescr=>describe_by_data(
                         wa_supl ).
    loop at il_fill_itab into wa_supl.
      loop at l_oref_structure->COMPONENTS into l_abap_compdescr.
        ASSIGN COMPONENT l_abap_compdescr-name
               OF STRUCTURE wa_supl TO <w_field1>.
        check1 = sy-subrc.
        ASSIGN COMPONENT l_abap_compdescr-name
               OF STRUCTURE <wa_dyn_table> TO <w_field2>.
        check2 = sy-subrc.
        if check1 = 0 and check2 = 0.
          <w_field2> = <w_field1>.
        endif.
      endloop.
      APPEND <wa_dyn_table> TO <t_dyn_table>.
    endloop.
You can access your dynamic internal table via a field symbol.
Svetlin

How to Improve inserts into Template table for Query Processing

Hi guys!
I need your advice. How can i improve inserts into template table (/BI0/0P00000010 for exemple)? In my scenario i forced to load data from cube C_X to cubes C_1, C_2 and C_3.
To get a goal i created a transformations and a DTP process with delta upload to each of cubes (C_1, C_2, C3). And that proccess takes about 3 hours! (it doesn't matter 1.000 or 100.000 records). But when i tried to load data with full update (with a filter) a proccess get data takes about 1 minutes.
I traced process and saw that inserting into template table (which create each time when proccess started) take the longest time. How can i improve it?

Hi Mahendar,
It will require some efforts to investigate it so I propose to open a support ticket with Microsoft (through portal).
Your first question interest me and I am not sure if you are doing proactive or reactive real time reporting. You can try with
HBase for storing and retrieving data. HBase known for providing good read and write speed. If you are not comfortable writing HBase syntax then you can add an abstraction layer i.e. HIVE. It might take little more time when you
query HBase from Hive.
If you are doing real time analytic, then you can choose from Strom and Microsoft Azure Stream Analytic.
Thanks and Regards,
Sudhir Rawat

How to insert into a table with a nested table which refer to another table

Hello everybody,
As the title of this thread might not be very understandable, I'm going to explain it :
In a context of a library, I have an object table about Book, and an object table about Subscriber.
In the table Subscriber, I have a nested table modeling the Loan made by the subscriber.
And finally, this nested table refers to the Book table.
Here the code concerning the creation of theses tables :
Book :
create or replace type TBook as object
number int,
title varchar2(50)
Loan :
create or replace type TLoan as object
book ref TBook,
loaning_date date
create or replace type NTLoan as table of TLoan;
Subscriber :
create or replace type TSubscriber as object
sub_id int,
name varchar2(25)
loans NTLoan
Now, my problem is how to insert into a table of TSubscriber... I tried this query, without any success...
insert into OSubscriber values
*(1, 'LEVEQUE', NTLoan(*
select TLoan(ref(b), '10/03/85') from OBook b where b.number = 1)
Of course, there is an occurrence of book in the table OBook with the number attribute 1.
Oracle returned me this error :
SQL error : ORA-00936: missing expression
00936. 00000 - "missing expression"
Thank you for your help

1) NUMBER is a reserved word - you can't use it as identifier:
SQL> create or replace type TBook as object
2 (
3 number int,
4 title varchar2(50)
5 );
6 /
Warning: Type created with compilation errors.
SQL> show err
Errors for TYPE TBOOK:
LINE/COL ERROR
0/0      PL/SQL: Compilation unit analysis terminated
3/1      PLS-00330: invalid use of type name or subtype name2) Subquery must be enclosed in parenthesis:
SQL> create table OSubscriber of TSubscriber
2 nested table loans store as loans
3 /
Table created.
SQL> create table OBook of TBook
2 /
Table created.
SQL> insert
2    into OBook
3    values(
4           1,
5           'No Title'
6          )
7 /
1 row created.
SQL> commit
2 /
Commit complete.
SQL> insert into OSubscriber
2    values(
3           1,
4           'LEVEQUE',
5           NTLoan(
6                  (select TLoan(ref(b),DATE '1985-10-03') from OBook b where b.num = 1)
7                 )
8          )
9 /
1 row created.
SQL> select *
2    from OSubscriber
3 /
    SUB_ID NAME
LOANS(BOOK, LOANING_DATE)
         1 LEVEQUE
NTLOAN(TLOAN(000022020863025C8D48614D708DB5CD98524013DC88599E34C3D34E9B9DBA1418E49F1EB2, '03-OCT-85'))
SQL> SY.

Creating a button for inserting into a table

What I can't do, because I've never needed to, is to create in a page (where I have a Interactive report) a button that when is clicked performs a simple sql (for example an insert into a table using some page item values).
How can I do it?
Thanks

Here are some of the steps:
1) Create the button.
2) Then right click on the button name and select Create Dynamic Action
3) Give the DA a name, click next
4) On the "When" Step, Event should already be "Click" and the button name should be filled in
5) For Condition, you would have a condition for when you want the button display. Say, if your page items have a certain range of values then display this button. No condition means the button is always displayed.
6) For the "True Action" Step, for Action select "Execute PL/SQL Code"
    [There are other ways to do this, but this is straight-forward for me.]
7) The in the PL/SQL Code block enter say:
Begin
INSERT INTO EMP (EMPNO, ENAME, HIREDATE)
          VALUES (:P6_EMPNO, 'MARK1970', :P6_HIREDATE);
COMMIT;
END;   --- You would likely make them all page item variables
8) Here the part I'm not 100% sure of.
    For "Page Items to Submit", name the page items used in YOUR QUERY -- in my example these are P6_EMPNO,P6_HIREDATE   (Note no use of & or : or . here)
    Hmm. Start by putting nothing in the "Page Items to Return".   If that fails, then try the same page items P6_EMPNO,P6_HIREDATE there as well.
[ I'm too lazy to go run this down at the moment.]
9) I think that's it.
Howard

How can I insert into a table other than the default table in a form

Hi,
I want to insert into a table with some fields value of a form of another table. I have written insert code On successful submission of that form, but after submit it gives the following error
An unexpected error occurred: ORA-06502: PL/SQL: numeric or value error (WWV-16016)
My code is like this
declare
l_trn_id number;
l_provider_role varchar2(3);
l_provider_id varchar2(10);
begin
l_trn_id := p_session.get_value_as_number(p_block_name=>'DEFAULT',p_attribute_name=>'A_TRANSACTION_ID');
l_provider_id := p_session.get_value_as_varchar2(p_block_name=>'DEFAULT',p_attribute_name=>'A_PROVIDER1');
l_PROVIDER_ROLE := p_session.get_value_as_varchar2(p_block_name=>'DEFAULT',p_attribute_name=>'A_PROVIDER_ROLE1');
if (l_provider_role is not null) and (l_provider_id is not null) then
insert into service_provider_trans_records(service_provider_id,transaction_id,role_type_id)
values(l_provider_id, l_trn_id, l_provider_role);
commit;
end if;
end;
Where 'PROVIDER1' and 'PROVIDER_ROLE1' are not table fields.
How can do that or why this error comes ? Any idea?
Thanks
Sumita

Hi,
When do you get this error? Is it while running or while creating the form.
Here is a sample code which inserts a non-database column dummy into a table called dummy. This is done in successful procedure.
declare
l_dummy varchar2(1000);
begin
l_dummy := p_session.get_value_as_varchar2(p_block_name=>'DEFAULT',
p_attribute_name=>'A_DUMMY');
insert into sjayaram903_1g.dummy values(l_dummy);commit;
end;
Please check in your case if the size of the local variable is enough to hold the values being returned.
Thanks,
Sharmila

Fetch data from one table and insert into two tables in desired format

I have similar to the following data in a table and it is not normalized. The groupID is being used to group two records of similar nature.
DECLARE @OldDoc TABLE (oldDocID INT, groupID INT, deptID INT)
INSERT INTO @OldDoc (oldDocID, groupID) VALUES (1, NULL, 111),(2,NULL,111),(3,1,111),(4,NULL,333),(5,1,222),(6,NULL,333),(7,2,222),(8,2,333),(9,NULL,111),(10,3,222),(11,NULL,333),(12,3,444)
I need to process the data from the above table (@OldDoc) and write into two new tables (@NewDoc and @NewDocGroup) as follows.
oldDocID should be stored as newDocID when inserting to @NewDoc table. Only records with groupID NULL and one record (first one) per group should be considered (For example, oldDocID 5 is not considered as 3 and 5 belong to the same groupID 1) for insertion.
DECLARE @NewDoc TABLE (newDocID INT)
INSERT INTO @NewDoc (newDocID) VALUES (1),(2),(3),(4),(6),(7),(9),(10),(11)
All records from @OldDoc should be considered for insertion into @NewDocGroup table. OldDocID is inserted as NewDocID and deptID is as-is. Instead of groupID, the ID of the first record in the
group should be considered as parentNewDocID (For example, 3 is considered as parentNewDocID for newDocID 5 as 3 and 5 belong to the same groupID in @OldDoc table) for the newDocID.
DECLARE @NewDocGroup (newDocID INT, parentNewDocID INT, deptID INT)
INSERT INTO @NewDocGroup (newDocID, parentNewDocID, deptID) VALUES (1,1,111),(2,2,111),(3,3,111),(4,4,333),(5,3,222),(6,6,333),(7,7,222),(8,7,333),(9,9,111),(10,10,222),(11,11,333),(12,10,444)
How do I accomplish the above using SQL ? Thanks for the help.

>> I have similar to the following data in a table and it is not normalized. The group_id is being used to group two records [sic] of similar nature. <<
Rows are not records. Tables have to have a key by definition. You do not do math with identifiers, so they should not be numeric. Let's ignore that error for now. In short, you are posting garbage. If you had followed Forum Netiquette, would you have posted
this?
CREATE TABLE Old_Documents
(old_doc_id INTEGER NOT NULL PRIMARY KEY,
group_id INTEGER,
dept_nbr INTEGER NOT NULL
REFERENCES Departments (dept_nbr));
INSERT INTO Old_Documents(old_doc_id, group_id, dept_nbr)
VALUES (1, NULL, 111),
(2, NULL, 111),
(3, 1, 111),
(4, NULL, 333),
(5, 1, 222),
(6, NULL, 333),
(7, 2, 222),
(8, 2, 333),
(9, NULL, 111),
(10, 3, 222),
(11, NULL, 333),
(12, 3, 444);
>> I need to process the data from the above table (Old_Documents) and write into two new tables (New_Documents and New_Documents_Groups) as follows. <<
Just like punch cards and mag tape data processing! Being old and being new are a status, not another kind of entity. But that is how mag tapes work. And you even use the verb "fetch" from tape files. This design flaw is called attribute splitting.
Do you have a Male_Personnel and Female_Personnel table? NO! It is just Personnel!
>> old_doc_id should be stored as new_doc_id when inserting to New_Documents table. Only records [sic] with group_id NULL and one record [sic] (first [sic; no ordering in a table] one) per group should be considered (For example, old_doc_id 5 is not considered
as 3 and 5 belong to the same group_id =1) for insertion. <<
Think about your punch card mindset. Why did you physically materialize that redundant New_Documents table? Let me answer that: this is how you work with punch cards! In SQL we use a VIEW:
CREATE VIEW New_Documents (new_doc_id)
AS
SELECT old_doc_id
FROM Old_Documents;
>> All records [sic] from Old_Documents should be considered for insertion into New_Documents_Groups table. The old_doc_id is inserted as new_doc_id and dept_nbr is as-is. Instead of group_id, the ID [sic: which identifier??] of the first [sic: tables
have no ordering like a deck of punch cards] record [sic] in the group should be considered as parent_new_doc_id (For example, 3 is considered as parent_new_doc_id for new_doc_id 5 as 3 and 5 belong to the same group_id in Old_Documents table) for the new_doc_id.
<<
Why not use 5 as the parent? My guess is that you are trying to form equivalence classes. See:
https://www.simple-talk.com/content/print.aspx?article=2020
--CELKO-- Books in Celko Series for Morgan-Kaufmann Publishing: Analytics and OLAP in SQL / Data and Databases: Concepts in Practice Data / Measurements and Standards in SQL SQL for Smarties / SQL Programming Style / SQL Puzzles and Answers / Thinking
in Sets / Trees and Hierarchies in SQL

Constantly inserting into large table with unique index... Guidance?

Hello all;
So here is my world. We have central to our data monitoring system an oracle database running Oracle Standard One (please don't laugh... I understand it is comical) licensing.
This DB is about 1.7 TB of small record data.
One table in particular (the raw incoming data, 350gb, 8 billion rows, just in the table) is fed millions of rows each day in real time by two to three main "data collectors" or what have you. Data must be available in this table "as fast as possible" once it is received.
This table has 6 columns (one varchar usually empty, a few numerics including a source id, a timestamp and a create time).
The data is collect in chronological order (increasing timestamp) 90% of the time (though sometimes the timestamp may be very old and catch up to current). The other 10% of the time the data can be out of order according to the timestamp.
This table has two indexes, unique (sourceid, timestamp), and a non unique (create time). (FYI, this used to be an IOT until we had to add the second index on create time, at which point a secondary index on create time slowed the IOT to a crawl)
About 80% of this data is removed after it ages beyond 3 months; 20% is retained as "special" long term data (customer pays for longer raw source retention). The data is removed using delete statements. This table is never (99.99% of the time) updated. The indexes are not rebuilt... ever... as a rebuild is about a 20+ hour process, and without online rebuilds since we are standard one, this is just not possible.
Now what we are observing is that the inserts into this table
- Inserts are much slower based on a "wider" cardinality of the "sourceid" of the data being inserted. What I mean is that 10,000 inserts for 10,000 sourceid (regardless of timestamp) is MUCH, MUCH slower than 10,000 inserts for a single sourceid. This makes sense to me, as I understand it that oracle must inspect more branches of the index for uniqueness, and more different physical blocks will be used to store the new index data. There are about 2 million unique sourceId across our system.
- Over time, oracle is requesting more and more ram to satisfy these inserts in a timely matter. My understanding here is that oracle is attempting to hold the leafs of these indexes perpetually buffers. Our system does have a 99% cache hit rate. However, we are seeing oracle requiring roughly 10GB extra ram per quarter to 6 months; we're at about 50gb of ram just for oracle already.
- If I emulate our production load on a brand new, empty table / indexes, performance is easily 10x to 20x faster than what I see when I do the same tests with the large production copies of data.
We have the following assumption: Partitioning this table based on good logical grouping of sourceid, and then timestamp, will help reduce the work required by oracle to verify uniqueness of data, reducing the amount of data that must be cached by oracle, and allow us to handle our "older than 3 month" at a partition level, greatly reducing table and index fragmentation.
Based on our hardware, its going to be about a million dollar hit to upgrade to Enterprise (with partitioning), plus a couple hundred thousand a year in support. Currently I think we pay a whopping 5 grand a year in support, if that, total oracle costs. This is going to be a huge pill for our company to swallow.
What I am looking for guidance / help on, should we really expect partitioning to make a difference here? I want to get that 10x performance difference back we see between a fresh empty system, and our current production system. I also want to limit oracles 10gb / quarter growing need for more buffer cache (the cardinality of sourceid does NOT grow by that much per quarter... maybe 1000s per quarter, out of 2 million).
Also, please I'd appreciate it if there were no mocking comments about using standard one up to this point :) I know it is risky and insane and maybe more than a bit silly, but we make due with what we have. And all the credit in the world to oracle that their "entry" level system has been able to handle everything we've thrown at it so far! :)
Alright all, thank you very much for listening, and I look forward to hear the opinions of the experts.

Hello,
Here is a link to a blog article that will give you the right questions and answers which apply to your case:
http://jonathanlewis.wordpress.com/?s=delete+90%25
As far as you are deleting 80% of your data (old data) based on a timestamp, then don't think at all about using the direct path insert /*+ append */ as suggested by one of the contributors to this thread. The direct path load will not re-use any free space made by the delete. You have two indexes:
(a) unique index (sourceid, timestamp)
(b) index(create time)
Your delete logic (based on arrival time) will smatch your indexes as far as you are always deleting the left hand side of the index; it means you will have what we call a right hand index - In other words, the scattering of the index key per leaf block is certainly catastrophic (there is an oracle iternal function named sys_op_lidbid that will allow you to verify this index information). There is a fairly chance that your two indexes will benefit from a coalesce as already suggested:
           ALTER INDEX indexname COALESCE;This coalesce should be investigated to be done on a regular basis (may be after each 80% delete) You seem to have several sourceid for one timestamp. If the answer is yes you should think about compressing this index
    create index indexname (sourceid, timestamp) compress;
or
    alter index indexname rebuild compress;     You will do it only once. Your index will have a smaller size and may be more efficient than it is actually. The index compression will add an extra CPU work during an insert but it might help improving the overal insert process.
Best Regards
Mohamed Houri

Insert into Nested Tables

Good day All,
I am working on my first nested table and having difficulty with INSERTS. Can someone explain what I am doing wrong?
Many Thanks,
Danny
describe PAT_HOST_SYSTEM
Name Null Type
HOST_ID NOT NULL NUMBER
IPADDR NOT NULL VARCHAR2(16 CHAR)
OS VARCHAR2(50 CHAR)
OS_VERSION VARCHAR2(254 CHAR)
KERNEL VARCHAR2(75 CHAR)
KERNEL_BUILD VARCHAR2(75 CHAR)
LAST_REBOOT VARCHAR2(50 CHAR)
OS_PATCH VARCHAR2(50 CHAR)
NUM_OF_CPU VARCHAR2(20 CHAR)
GLOBAL_ZONE VARCHAR2(3)
LOCAL_ZONE VARCHAR2(3)
MACHINE VARCHAR2(255)
UPTIME VARCHAR2(50)
LAST_UPDATE DATE
ZONE_CHILDREN LOCAL_ZONE()
15 rows selected
describe LOCAL_ZONE
user type definition
TYPE local_zone AS OBJECT
(ID VARCHAR2(50),
ZONE_NAME VARCHAR2(50));
3 rows selected
INSERT INTO TABLE (SELECT ZONE_CHILDREN FROM PAT_HOST_SYSTEM WHERE HOST_ID='561') VALUES ('a808d6ceee', 'tspxxx01');
Error starting at line 1 in command:
INSERT INTO TABLE (SELECT ZONE_CHILDREN FROM PAT_HOST_SYSTEM WHERE HOST_ID='561') VALUES ('a808d6ceee', 'tspxxx01')
Error at Command Line:1 Column:12
Error report:
SQL Error: ORA-22905: cannot access rows from a non-nested table item
22905. 00000 - "cannot access rows from a non-nested table item"
*Cause:    attempt to access rows of an item whose type is not known at
parse time or that is not of a nested table type
*Action:   use CAST to cast the item to a nested table type

Hello Danny and welcome to the forum,
are you trying to insert data into a table which has a collection as a column ?
The phrase nested table was very misleading (at least for me), also the code you posted was kinda incomplete.
I could not follow the code you posted, alternately I am posting some sample code with the DDL and insert statements for your understanding.
create or replace type emp_obj as object
ejob varchar2(100),
comm number,
edeptno number
create table employee
(ename varchar2(50),
empno number,
esal number,
edetails emp_obj
/Populating the employee table with INSERT :
insert into employee values ('KING',7839,5000,emp_obj('PRESIDENT',0,10));
insert into employee values ('BLAKE',7698,2850,emp_obj('MANAGER',0,30));Now, querying the table for all columns with SELECT :
ENAME     EMPNO     ESAL     EDETAILS.EJOB     EDETAILS.COMM     EDETAILS.EDEPTNO
KING     7839     5000     PRESIDENT         0                 10
BLAKE     7698     2850     MANAGER       0                 30Hope it is now clear.

How to capture insert into wf_notifications table

we are building a custom app, which needs to know as soon as a row in insterted into the wf_notifications table, and we want to avod creating a on insert trigger on this table.
Is there a way to figure out that a row is being inserted into this table without having to write a trigger.
Thanks
Tapash

Oracle Workflow raises a business event oracle.apps.wf.notification.send as soon a notification record is created in WF_NOTIFICATIONS table. This business event has parameters such as NOTIFICATION_ID, RECIPIENT_ROLE etc. If you have access to the notification id you may access all other information from WF_NOTIFICATIONS table.
You may create a subscription to this business event with On Error -> Skip property so that in case of an error, your subscription does not impact the normal processing of seeded subscriptions. You may have a PLSQL rule function in the subscription to process the logic required when the notification is created.
Please refer to Oracle Workflow Developer Guide for more information on using Business Event System.
Hope this helps.
Vijay

How can I get a count at the same time I am inserting into another table

I have a requirement where I have to find out the count(number of records inserted into another table) at the same time I insert into the table:
Like
I am copying records from table B to A, while doing this I have to find out how many records I've inserted since I need this count in subsequent steps
INSERT INTO A
SELECT * FROM B
how can I store the count into any variable while doing above statement
Please advice

No, Warren that doesn't work!
SQL> set serveroutput on
SQL> declare
2     vCtr number := 0;
3 begin
4     insert into emp2
5     select * from emp;
6
7     select count(*)
8       into vCtr
9       from emp2;
10
11     dbms_output.put_line('rows created '||to_char(vCtr));
12 end;
13 /
rows created 15
PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
SQL> declare
2     vCtr number := 0;
3 begin
4     insert into emp2
5     select * from emp;
6
7     select count(*)
8       into vCtr
9       from emp2;
10
11     dbms_output.put_line('rows created '||to_char(vCtr));
12 end;
13 /
rows created 30
PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
SQL>

How to extract data from xml and insert into Oracle table

Hi,
I have a large xml file. which will have hundreds of the following transaction tags having column names and there values.
There is a table one of the schema with coulums "actualCostRate","billRate"....etc.
I need to extract the values of these columns and insert into the table
<Transaction actualCostRate="0" billRate="0" chargeable="1" clientID="NikuUK" chargeCode="LCOCD1" externalID="L-RESCODE_UK1-PROJ_UK_CNT_GBP-37289-8" importStatus="N" projectID="TESTPROJ" resourceID="admin" transactionDate="2002-02-12" transactionType="L" units="11" taskID="5017601" inputTypeCode="SALES" groupId="123" voucherNumber="ABCVDD" transactionClass="ABCD"/>
<Transaction actualCostRate="0" billRate="0" chargeable="1" clientID="NikuEU" chargeCode="LCOCD1" externalID="L-RESCODE_US1-PROJ_EU_STD2-37291-4" importStatus="N" projectID="TESTPROJ" resourceID="admin" transactionDate="2002-02-04" transactionType="L" units="4" taskID="5017601" inputTypeCode="SALES" groupId="124" voucherNumber="EEE222" transactionClass="DEFG"/>

Re: Insert from XML to relational table
http://www.google.ae/search?hl=ar&q=extract+data+from+xml+and+insert+into+Oracle+table+&btnG=%D8%A8%D8%AD%D8%AB+Google&meta=

Inserting Into MYSQL Table Via Air/PHP = Not Allowed?

I'm having trouble inserting data into my mysql database tables through my air app. All the code is pretty much exactly the same as in some examples I've seen but it simply won't do it. Is this because of some sort of security restriction because the air app is on my machine and the server with my mysql database on is elsehwhere? Or is it possible to insert data via an air app?
Here is the example I've been following:-
http://livedocs.adobe.com/flex/3/html/help.html?content=data_access_2.html

jimmyoneshot wrote:
Thanks for the answers boys. I've decided I'm going to change it into a flex app instead as then there won't be any problems. It simply means I'll have to add a logon system to it.
While were on the subject do you guys happen to know of any examples anywhere of how someone can REMOVE data from an sql table via flex/php?
What I'm looking for is basically when a user uses my app and enters info into some text inputs, if that specfic info exists within a table then that data will be removed from the table. The way this works is that they will choose an item within a tilelist which is populated by the data from this mysql table and this will insert the data of the selected item into the text inputs and then they click a remove button to remove that item. Can't find anything similar anywhere though.
You will have to use a common identifier, eg:
give each row in your database an ID.
then pass that ID value on the button press to a PHP script, which does something like:
$deleteID = $_POST["delID"];
mysql_query("DELETE FROM exampleTable WHERE ID='$deleteID
maybe check that a row with that ID exists first for verification, then pass back a value indicating if removal was a success or not.
You can delete on other values, but remember they have to be unique for the database, else you'll run the risk of deleting multiple values.
Or you could delete on a compound key, depends on the data you're storing in the grid.

Build a sql query fro different table and insert into a table

Hi I have a requirement ,
i have some table 1 table which holds rules which rules i have to apply on the sql query
2 table will hold table name and column name and transformation
with these help of 2 tables i want to build a sql quey and the sql query need to be insert into another table.

Hi Karthick,
I am not going to build Dynamic Data Model.
i already have table 1 contains rules let's say COUNT,
and another table contain source table name , column name , Target table name, Source Table name like that
so with the help of these 2 tables i want to build Sql query and going to insert into 3rd table.

Inserting into a table which is created "on the fly" from a trigger

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for