Integrated Configuration-with multiple receivers(synchronous )

Hi All,
Our scenario is web service to proxy(2 receivers) synchronous scenario.....
sender is a party and 2 receivers are 2 different business systems....
we have to create a ICO.....
when i am creating up to receiver interface is fine...
in outbound processing tab i didnt find any communication channel.....
what is the issue????
any one could you please suggest me the process
Thanks In Advance,
vishnu

Hi All,
Thanks,
I got the solution.... like below....
Use SOAP Adapter both Sender and Receiver.
Create the Sender SOAP Adapter User Message Protocol: SOAP 1.1 (This is for web Service)
Create the Receiver SOAP Adapter User Message Protocol : XI3.0 (This is for AAE Adapter)

Similar Messages

Event configured with multiple receivers

We have a business object event(say service order technically completed) configured (SWETYPVor SWE2) in our system for two receivers, one a workflow and another is just DUMMY with custom receiver function module. What we are noticing is that the events meant for the DUMMY receiver are going to the workflow receiver.
How do we route the event to the appropriate receiver? Sometimes, the event raised is relevant for the DUMMY receiver and other times, it is relevant for the workflow receiver.

Hello,
You say:
"What we are noticing is that the events meant for the DUMMY receiver are going to the workflow receiver."
I'm not sure if that's the right way to look at it. An event just exists, it's other processes and objects that listen out for it.
What they do with that event is up to them. If you want to differentiate then either create separate events or provide a parameter that the recipient can test for.
regards
Rick Bakker
Hanabi Technology

CSM - serverfarms configured with multiple probes

Hi - If a serverfarm is configured with multiple probes, do the servers within the farm remain active if they respond positively to both probes or do they just need to respond to one of the configured probes?
Thanks in advance

Both probe must respond positively to make the server appears as OPERATIONAL.
If only one probe is responding positively then the server is considered DOWN
That is usefull for UDP test :
you need to check taht you don't have a RST when openning an UDP connection ( the UDP port is not closed) and you need to make ping (in order to be sure that there is a server ;-) )

How does receive() work with multiple receivers/subscribers?

Hi,
actually I'm using the JMS API to create a lightweight MQ service for Java ME tailored for my purposes. I'm generally familiar with JMS but I have some question to which I couldn't find the answer neither in the API spec nor on google. I think that many of you can answer it.
At first, is it possible to create multiple receivers on the same queue (same or different sessions)? Generally, I though a queue can only have one consumer since the call of receive() will delete the message from the queue so that a theoretical second consumer couldn't get the message anymore. But int the APi docs, it doesn't explain what happens if you call createReceiver() multiple times. Will it throw an exceptions?
A similar question goes for topics. A topic is supposed to support multiple subscribers. When subscribers register listeners, I understand it. But what if they don't and instead call receive() which is available because TopicSubcriber extends MessageConsumer. Is the message also deleted from the queue or is receive not supported for topics and will throw an exception? Will it remain until all subscribers have either called receive on that message or have been notified by onMessage? If yes, what happens if a subscriber doesn't call receive. Does the message stays there forever? What if new messages coming in, will the queue wait until the previous message is completely consumed?
From my point of view, I tend to only allow one receiver for a queue. If the receiver calls receive, the message will be deleted. For topics, I would only allow listeners, not receive() calls. Once the message has been delivered to all subscribers it will be deleted. If I'm misunderstanding the concepts, please correct me!
Thanks a lot!

At first, is it possible to create multiple receivers on the same queue (same or different sessions)? Generally, I though a queue can only have one consumer since the call of receive() >will delete the message from the queue so that a theoretical second consumer couldn't get the message anymore. But int the APi docs, it doesn't explain what happens if you call >createReceiver() multiple times. Will it throw an exceptions?If you have multiple receivers on the same queue then the JMS provider will distribute messages between the two receivers on the basis that each message goes to only one receiver. The exact distribution of messages depends on the JMS provider, and is not mandated by the JMS specification.
A similar question goes for topics. A topic is supposed to support multiple subscribers. When subscribers register listeners, I understand it. But what if they don't and instead call >receive() which is available because TopicSubcriber extends MessageConsumer. Is the message also deleted from the queue or is receive not supported for topics and will throw an >exception? You can consume messages from a topic using either a MessageListener or by calling receive(). They both work in the same way.
Will it remain until all subscribers have either called receive on that message or have been notified by onMessage? If yes, what happens if a subscriber doesn't call receive. Does the message stays there forever? What if new messages coming in, will the queue wait until the previous message is completely consumed?Essentially, if you send a message to a topic then it will be delivered to every subscriber, irrespective of whether that subscriber is synchronous (calling receive() or asynchronous (supplying a MessageListener).
In both cases, the consumer might not actually be ready to accept that message just yet (the applicaiton might not have called receive() yet, or onMessage() is still processing a previous message). In this case the message will be held within the JMS provider in an internal queue of messages designated for that specific consumer. Logically speaking, there's an internal queue for each consumer, rather than an internal queue for the whole topic, though how the provider actually implements this will vary. Note that the concept of each subscriber on a topic having its own internal queue is not one described in the documentation, it's just a way for me to explain it.
If the consumer closes before it actually receives the messages waiting in its queue, and the subscriber is non-durable, then the internal queue will be thrown away. If the subscriber is durable then the internal queue continues to exist and continues to accumulate messages even after the subscriber has closed.
From my point of view, I tend to only allow one receiver for a queue.
If the receiver calls receive, the message will be deleted. For topics, I would only allow listeners, not receive() calls.
Once the message has been delivered to all subscribers it will be deleted. If I'm misunderstanding the concepts, please correct me!Yes, you have slightly misunderstood this :-) I hope my explanation above helps clarify this.
Nigel

BSPs configuration with multiple apps servers

Hi Masters,
This is regrarding configure ICM and BSPs on our production box with multiple application servers.
We have our production box in a cluster environment.
The central instance is dbciSAP and apps servers are sapaps2 thru sapaps6. The database is on shared disks. Whenever the central instance fails sapaps2 takes the control and become as dbciSAP but the main dbciSAP never become a application server when ever sapaps2 acts as dbciSAP. Since we have configured load balancing concept in production environment the users can login to system thru any application server. This is waht our environment.
As part of our production box to SAP 4.7 upgrade from 4.6C, we are asked to configure the environment to deploy BSPs. We have successfully configured and deployed the BSPs in our DEV and QAS system (Both are central instances with no application servers) except production box which is due in the next month.
The process we follow to activate BSPs is as follows:
1.Define an ICM service port in /etc/services file.
2.Add the ICM related parameters in instance profiles.
3.Make sure the ICM status is active in SMICM tx.
4.Activate the BSP services in SICF as per OSS note 571484.
Now, the question is how to configure the same ICM service and activate the BSPs since we have multiple multiple application servers.
Subsequently What I am enquirying is:
Do I need to define ICM service ports on each and every hosts where the application servers are running?
Do I need to make changes to each and every instance profile of the application server?
What are the differences in configuring ICM services on central instance and application instances?
Appreciate any help in this regard.
Thanks and Regards
Murty Patchipala

Grasshopper,
I think what you should really read up on is the SAP WebDispatcher. If are serious about running BSP/ICM across multiple app servers, this is the key technology:
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/42/5cfd3b0e59774ee10000000a114084/frameset.htm This may also answer some of your questions about profile parameters.
Other than that I can share what we did. We did activate the ICM and services on all app servers and central instance. The service ports of the individual servers aren't that important now because of the WebDispatcher (at least they aren't visible to the user).
Yes we did make some of the ICM profile changes in each instance profile. If your settings are the same, consider using the default profile. Are their particular settings you are interested? I will look over ours, but I don't remember any huge differences from APP server to Central Instance.

Integrated configuration with parameterized mapping

Dear All,
My scenario is using integrated configuration AAE. I am trying parameterized mapping with Integrated configuratiion but it throws an error saying that AAE doesnt support parameterized mapping.
I am uisng PI 7.1 I wanted to know doest PI 7.3 support this or which service pack on PI 7.1 support Parametrized mapping with AEE.
Any thoughs on this.
chirag

Hi Chirag,
Integrated Configuration Scenario with Parameterized mapping is not supported in PI 7.1, 7.1 EHP1 or even in 7.3
This is a limitation with AAE based scenarios. However, you can still use Parameterized mapping in Classical Scenarios(ID,RD,SA,RA). This is well supported in PI 7.1 and higher versions.
Please take a look for the CAUTION statement in the following link:
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw73/helpdata/en/94/75de6590d64673b1e94ac072842ee3/content.htm
I hope this helps.
Regards,
Gaurav.

Integrating BIP with multiple LDAP servers

Hi,
my question is very simple. In Admin->Security Configuration->Security Model section i've setted Security model combobox with LDAP value. Then i've filled all LDAP information field (for example:URL). All works. But in my rpd i 've multiple LDAP servers (multiple URL) and in the form i can insert information about only one LDAP server.
Is it possible configure BIP with multiple LDAP servers?
Thanks
Giancarlo
P.S. I'm using OBIEE 10g

Hi,
my question is very simple. In Admin->Security Configuration->Security Model section i've setted Security model combobox with LDAP value. Then i've filled all LDAP information field (for example:URL). All works. But in my rpd i 've multiple LDAP servers (multiple URL) and in the form i can insert information about only one LDAP server.
Is it possible configure BIP with multiple LDAP servers?
Thanks
Giancarlo
P.S. I'm using OBIEE 10g

Single Nexus 5548UP- FCoE configuration with multiple server ports

Hello Everyone,
I am new to Networking so please bear with me.
Here is some background information. We have a SINGLE Nexus 5548 UP switch to which we are connecting both the storage and the UCS C240 M3 servers (with CNA). Both the storage and server has 2 ports each going to this nexus switch.
We want to implement FCoE with this solution.
Below are the steps (for server ports) that I have followed to configure the nexus. But the port not logging into the SAN (no flogi) with the config.
Enable Features
config t
feature lacp
feature dot1x
feature interface-vlan
feature sshServer
feature npiv
end
Confgure Ethernet Ports - Server
configure
interface ethernet 1/17
description To_UCS_rack_server_1_FCoE_port_1
switchport mode trunk
switchport trunk native vlan 6
switchport trunk allowed vlan 1,6
spanning-tree port type edge trunk
priority-flow-control mode on
no shutdown
end
configure
interface ethernet 1/18
description To_UCS_rack_server_1_FCoE_port_2
switchport mode trunk
switchport trunk native vlan 6
switchport trunk allowed vlan 1,6
spanning-tree port type edge trunk
priority-flow-control mode on
no shutdown
end
Create VLAN
configure
vlan 6
name FCOE_VLAN
fcoe vsan 6
end
Setup FCoE QOS
configure terminal
system qos
service-policy type qos input fcoe-default-in-policy
service-policy type queuing input fcoe-default-in-policy
service-policy type queuing output fcoe-default-out-policy
service-policy type network-qos fcoe-default-nq-policy
end
Create vfc for Initiators (UCS Servers)
configure
interface vfc 17
bind interface ethernet 1/17
switchport description virtual_fiber_channel_Server1_Port1
end
configure
interface vfc 18
bind interface ethernet 1/18
switchport description virtual_fiber_channel_Server1_Port2
end
Adding vFC’s to VSAN
configure
vsan database
vsan 6 interface vfc 17
vsan 6 interface vfc 18
Create Zonesets and Zones
configure
show flogi database vsan 6 ----> Do not see any pwwn here???
show fcns database vsan 6
Any help in the regard would be highly appreciated.
Cheers,
KS

Fixed the issue. "switchport trunk native vlan 6" was causing the issue. Maybe the storage and Servers were not configured with proper VLAN's. I removed the native vlan and everything logged in fine.
Any how I have configured a single zone with all 3 servers pWWN's. I know single initiator zoning is the way to go.
Can you please guide me if I can move these servers in their separate zones without any outages? If it helps, all severs have 2 pWWN's. The current zoneset is active with that single zone.
Please let me know if you need any additional details.
Cheers,
KS

Create multiple idoc with multiple receivers based on value mapping table

Hi,
Scenario:
Step1 : sender sends a finance doc iin the form of an idoc. This idoc will have multiple line items based on profit center. Do determine the value of receiving comp code(header field) n receiving system(logical sys name) value mapping table has to be used.
Solution so far: I can put an rfc lookup for fetching receiving comp code from mapping table with i/p paraameter as profit center . And split the incoming idoc based on comp code value by using split by value. Now I need your advise 2 take this further.
Issue 1 : say the incoming idoc has 4 line seg wid 4 diff profit center
Profit center.       Rec comp code.   Recv sys
P1.                       C1.                        R1
P2.                       C2.                        R1
PS.                       C2.                        R1
P3.                       C3.                        R2
Nw using this info, I want 3 diff idocs to be created for each unique comp code.
Idoc 1 : for C1 wid one line item + 1 for reconsilation ( to be generated additionally)
Idoc2 : for C2 wid 2 line items + 1 for reconsilation
Idoc 3: for C3 wid 1 line item + 1 for reconsilation
Idoc 1 and idoc 2 shud be sent to R1.
Idoc 3 shud be sent to R2.
Kindly advise on this

Hi experts,
U all r pretty close, but let me put this more clearly.
Step1: create multiple idocs based on unique comp code - I'm able to do this using rfc lookup n split by value. So I get 3 idocs each for c1, c2 n c3.
Nw as per the values from value mapping table.
Idoc for c1 contains 1 line seg.
Idoc for c2 contains 2 line segs.
N idoc for c3 contains 1 line seg.
steps2 n 3, where I do not have a confirmed solution yet n need ur advise.
Step 2 : for each idoc generated I need 2 create n additional segment, mapping 4 which will be based on the values in the original segments for that idoc.
In d above scenario, idoc for c1 contains 1 line seg, nw I want 2 add one more seg to it. The amount and pisting key values in this segment wud be calculated based on the values of the amount and posting key belonging to the original segment in this idoc.
Similarly for idoc for c2 there are 2 segs, nw I need one more, means 3 in allm
Hence for idoc for c3, 1 orig already present + 1 more. = total 2.
Nw I need ur advise on how 2 generate this additional seg in each idocm
Step 3: when all dese 3 idocs are generated, ( in this case itz 3, in real time it can be n), I need to find their respective receivers using rfc lookup n then based on the receiver send 2 resp recvng systm
Nw how do I do this?
Please explain with examples if possible 4 bettr understanding.
u2020ђąu03B7kўu03C3u03C5 in advance.

Integrating Presence with multiple AD/Exchange Domains

We have a single CUCM cluster that support several organizations. Some of these organizations want to implement CUPS with integration with their Exchange Servers. Each organization has their own, seperate AD Tree and Exchange server (some integrate with their own Unity, some others have their own Unity Connection server). However, Presence only allows a single Outlook Presence Gateway for Free/Busy indication. This is a problem.
One thought is that each organization get their own Presence server, but can non-clustered Presence servers integrate with one CUCM cluster? I know that a single Presence Cluster will not support multiple CUCM clusters, but does it have to be a 1-to-1 relationship?
Second, can different Presence servers in the same cluster point to different Outlook Presence Gateways? If so, we can simply add a Presence server for each organization that points to that org's Exchange server.

The answer is yes and no.
Yes, you may install multiple CUPS servers with one CUCM cluster. You may point each CUPS server to different Exchange server.
Most of the features will work but phone presence ("on-the-phone" status). Because on CUCM, you can only specify one SIP trunk as PUBLISH trunk. And one SIP trunk can only point to one CUPS server (cluster).
There might be some "workarounds". But I haven't tested them yet. So it might or might not work.
Workaround 1: Set up a "proxy device" to redirect traffic. All CUPS server point to this device. This device will redirect the traffic based on difference email domain. This device could be a layer 7 content switch, an Exchange server, or a firewall/web proxy with content inspection features.
Workaround 2: On CUPS > Presence > Settings, uncheck "Enable SIP Publish on CUCM". Without this option, CUPS will use SUBSCRIBE/NOTIFY model to get phone presence from CUCM. You don't have to specify a PUBLISH trunk on CUCM. This works on CUCM 5.x. But I haven't tested on CUCM 6.x or above.
Ultimate Solution: talk to a Cisco sale person and request multi-tenant feature to be added to CUPS. You're not the first one who asked for this. Development team just wait for enough requests to justify the decision.
Michael
http://htluo.blogspot.com

Multi-mapping scenario with multiple receivers

Hello all,
I have an interface using multi-mapping to generate to different files types from one source; works great.
JDBC --> XI --> (1) XML (2) CSV
I now need to have the XML file go to one receiver and the CSV file needs to go to a second receiver. I've looked at the blog:
/people/venkataramanan.parameswaran/blog/2006/03/17/illustration-of-enhanced-receiver-determination--sp16
This blog shows how to configure dynamic receiver determination based on the source data. In my case the output files are identical (as far as mapping), the only difference is the output format. Has any one seen a "How to" document or blog more in line to my scenario?
Regards,
Jose

Hi,
You can also do this way
You can define as many number of Business system you need. Say for eg you need to send XML to one BS and CSV to another BS.
Instead of doing Extended interface determination... Goto to Receiver Determination and when you are adding the Receiver service you have the option to add one more Service... There you give both the Business Service and hence you will have two inbound interface and you can different interface mapping and so on..
Regards,
Prakash

Integrating CRM with multiple R/3

Hi All,
We have 3 R/3 and 1 CRM systems. All master data same 3 ERP systems. For example Material number :ABC same 3 ERP systems. 3 ERP systems different master data GUID number produced and this GUID number problem extraction to CRM system.
Can somebody please tell how to integrate the CRM to multiple R/3 systems for both Initial and delta download
Best regards,

Hi Okan,
Define the naming convention that you are going to follow in CRM for the Business Partner.
Define a External No range for your Busienss partner in CRM w.r.t to your R/3 system
It is very much possible to assign your No ranges to the Business partner during its intial Load.
When delta comes you have to mach the same key as it was generated during the intial load.
Hope this helps
Regards
Sourabh

Integrating RMI with multiple systems

I have a 1 system running on IBM mainframe , one website running on Linux, and one Point-of-Sale System running on Window Server.
How do i integrate these systems using RMI?
Need answers asap!
Thank you!

You design a client/server system; you design the RMI remote interfaces; you write implementations of these interfaces, and RMI client code to make use of them. You deploy.

Extending Guest Wifi with Multiple Base Stations

The 7.6.3 firmware update reports this new feature:
"The ability to extend the Guest Wi-Fi network on a network that is configured with multiple AirPort Base Stations"
http://support.apple.com/kb/DL1617
I assumed that this meant that an Airport Express was able to "Extent" the guest wifi network. However, I am not able to get this to work. Having entered all the details I just get the orange light and the message that it was unable to extend the network - check the details. I have checked them multiple times and still not working. If I switch to extending the "main" network then it works first time, but does not extend the guest as far as I can see.
If I set up from scratch it picks up the guest network and tries to extend but then switches to the main wifi later in the process after claiming to extend the base station itself, not one of the wifi networks.
What does this update mean?! Has anyone managed to "extend the Guest Wi-Fi network" in any way?
All devices have been updated to 7.6.3 and all airport utilities have been updated to the latest version (6.2).
I am running an extreme as the main router then I have a number of expresses to extend round a large building, but it is the guest that needs extending!!
Any help would be much appreciated!
Adam

I am running an extreme as the main router then I have a number of expresses to extend round a large building
You need to have the "new" AirPort Express to be able to extend the Guest Network. The "new" Express looks like a miniature AirPort Extreme.
Check the Model No on the side of the AirPort Express devices that you have. If you see A1264 this is an older version of the Express that does not have Guest Network capabiltiy.
Using an AirPort Extreme and new AirPort Express here., the Guest Network "extends" just fine when I try this using wireless only. I also have another AirPort connected back to the main AirPort Extreme using a wired Ethernet connection. The Guest Network is extended on this device as well.

Failure when FWSM in transparent mode with multiple contexts

hi experts,
We have two FWSMs working in active/standby state, configured with multiple contexts in transparent mode. and the "outside" and "inside" interfaces for each context are in same subnet.
Now we have one FWSM broken and the RMA part can't arrived in short time, so we have the risk that the sencond FWSM could be failed as well. In the worst case if the two was broken or powered off simultaneously, i wonder that if the communications between multiple contexts could be ok???
thanks in advance.

The software requirements for Cisco Secure ACS are dependent on the type of Extensible Authentication Protocol (EAP) desired. For full support of all the EAP types including EAP-Flexible Authentication via Secure Tunneling (FAST), use release 3.2.3 or higher.
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/netsol/ns340/ns394/ns431/ns434/networking_solutions_implementation_guide09186a008038906c.html

Integrated Configuration-with multiple receivers(synchronous )

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for