Inter company with three company codes

Is it possible to use inter company in three?
e.g. CC01 creates sales orders from CC02's stock and somehow automatically in CC02 the system generates a requisition to CC03 whom send this requisition to the vendor.
Does anyone had this problem, or is this possible?
Any good information will be reworded.
A.C.

Hi,
Of course, it is possible to do this. As far as standard SAP is concerned, intercompany transactions can be carried out between only 2 company codes.
We have done an enhancement in which 4 company codes are considered for the intercompany scenario. Company A creates the sales orders for the end customer and delivery plant will be of Company D. Company D delivers the material directly to the customer and creates an intercompany invoice on company C. Then Company C creates an intercompany invoice on Company B and Company inturn creates an intercompany invoice on Company A. Then, finally, Company A creates the customer invoice on the end customer.
You would require 2 different enhacements here.
1. To update the partner functions (Slod to, Bill to and Payer) during the first IC invoice (between Company D and Company C)
2. To create IC invoices automatically between Company C & B and Company B and A.
Hope this is clear. Let me know, I can give you the BAPI's to be used as well.
Regards,
Raghav

Similar Messages

TAX code custmisaion for Overseas Company with local Tax code

Hi Gurus...
I am facing following scenario:
**My company is set ups as overseas company / company code curr / local Curr = overseas Curr, My group currency is local currency / home country curr.
**I like to raise PO for a vendor who is local and supplying goods locally, invoicing in local currency for Overseas company. Goods will be used locally.
I like to know how should I configure this from TAX perspective.
Thanks
Hiren
Edited by: Hiren Mazumdar on Mar 6, 2009 4:04 AM

Hi
<u>SPRO Path - hope this will help you in customizing </u>
1.
SRM Server -> Cross-Appl Basic settings -> Tax Calculation ->Determine Tax Code for Country/Product Category.
2.
SRM Server -> Cross-Appl Basic settings -> Transaction Tax engine -> Define Tax Settings .
<b>Please go through the links below -></b>
Re: Tax Calculation
Re: Tax code T1 does not exist for jurisdiction code error in shopping basket
BBP_DET_TAXCODE_BADI is not setting the Tax Code ! :-(
Tax code is not changing in back-end
Tax code
Tax code T1 does not exist for jurisdiction code error in shopping basket
Change tax code in SC
Regards
- Atul

Single excise registraction to two excise registration with same company code

Dear all,
Our customer is using single excise registraction now with three plants and one company code and doing STO between the plants with shipping (641/101). We have implemented SAP with the above scenario. (SAP ECC 6.4 implementation with TAXINN procedure)
Now, the excise registraction is splitted into two, out of three plants, two plant comes under one excise registration and remaining one plant comes under another registration.still all the three plants are under the same company code only.
Need your help on what are all the changes interms of process and configurations
Earlier response will be highly appriciated
Reg
Sridharan

HI Sridhar,
You have to define customer, vendor option but without account aspect.
Following are the steps in STO between a plant ( seperate Excisable units)
You will create an STO ( Purchase order from Receiving plant)
1: Create Delivery and excise invoice on the basis of performa invoice ( in performa invocie no accounting entry) Excise register will be updated on the basis of this not account entry would be as below:
Delivery: ( movement type 641)
Stock at receiving plant Dr to
Stock at Sending palnt
You would be following standard cost incase of SFG and FG. so materail valuation would on same basis and there may be valuation difference.
Excsie invoice generation:
Excise Clearing account Dr To
Excise Duty payable
Excise Duty Cess Payable
Excsie Duty hCess Payable
At receiving palnt you would receive material through MIGO no account entry will be generated only physical receepi of material.
Capture the excise in J1iex wrt to excsie challan.
Hope the process will help you.
Regards
Pankaj

PO created with wrong Company code

Hi Gurus,
I have Plant XXXX assigned to Company code 1111 and
Plant YYYY assigned to Company code 2222
One of the user has created PO with Plant XXXX and company code wrong as 2222.
(we have warning message setup & not error message. So, it allowed user to create PO with wrong Company code and save)
GR & IR both are already posted. I find the accounting document of these GR/IR show correct company code as XXXX-1111 (mostly would have taken correctly based on plant XXXX).
These are service POs (non stock).
Now user wants to change the company code in PO to 1111.
I checked...and system simply allow to change to company code to correct one i.e 1111. It does not give any message.
Could any one give me some additional info.. if it is right to do so? I am not too convinced at this moment.
I was suggesting user to reverse GR, IR, delete PO and create new PO. Is that right?
Thanks n advance for your input.
Best Regards,
Mohan

Dear Mohan,
U can change the company code in PO as it will not have any impact since the GR and IR is completed.
Accounts are hit based on the valution area(valuation grouping code).
Since the PO is already closed u can go ahead the change the same.
Regards,
AM Vahanan

SRM PO created with wrong company code

Hello,
The users have created several PO in SRM with wrong company code. The user was found in the wrong organization structure during the creation of shopping and approval. The PO did not get transfer to the Back because of this. Is there a way to modify the PO and change the company code.
In case we want to modify it in the tables given that BBP_PD gives you an indication of which table and entry to modify, is there a way to do this operation (like SE16N in ECC)? Have you ever done this and what risk is their in such an operation.
Thank you.

Hi,
I doubt anyone here will (or will dare) suggesting to you how to do it as it is against SAP practise totally. if the document is created wrongly, it should be deleted and approved with all the tracking and changes in place for auditing purposes.
Frankly that is what you should practise as well.. my 2cents opinion.
Regards.
YS

Company with 2 paying company codes

We have a requirement to have company A paid by company B's bank account for the majority of AP payment methods: BACS, Cheques etc.That works.
But company A also has it's own bank account and wishes to pay one payment type from that account.
Although I have sent up this payment method for company B, it still want to pay via F110 from the company B's bank account.
Has anyone been able to to configure a company with 2 paying company bank accounts?

I am not sure if you have understood the requirements
Company code B all payment methods is paid by company code B and B's bank account
Company code A all payment methods except one paid by company code B ans B'sbank account
New payment method only for company code A to be paid from company code A's bank account

Vendor Master Creation through IDoc with Multiple Company Codes

I am trying to create vendor masters sent from a 3rd party into SAP using CREMAS05 IDoc. I have the requirement that the vendor should be created in each of 3 company codes and the vendor number is internally assigned in SAP.
I create my IDoc with the general data E1LFA1M and multiple E1LFB1M & E1LFB5M Children. When I post the IDoc using IDOC_INPUT_CREMAS which uses Call Transaction, the vendor gets created for the first company code, but the IDoc errors on the vendor extension XK01 for the next company code with the error: "Fill all required fields SAPMF02K 0111 ADDR1_DATA-NAME1".
In debugging through this, it appears that the vendor number that gets created in the first XK01 transaction does not get passed into the data for the second XK01 call and SAP tries to create a new vendor instead of extending the newly created one.
If I force the value in during debug after the initial call transaction into the variable h_lifnr, it works fine (Vendor created with multiple company codes.
Any help would be greatly appreciated.
-Larry

I cannot give you exact solution, but can guess why this is happening, below is what I believe.
I think Synchronous update is not happening in call transaction, second transaction is getting processed before the first one is saved, debugging it works fine, because we give system enough time to save while processing.
Generally in call transaction we have MODE, if we pass S - then synchronous update happens, in your case, you need to find the way to incorporate this.
Hope it helps.
Regards,
Ravi Kishore.

Issue with Cross-Company code transactions and Extended Withholding tax

Hi Gurus,
I am having an issue with Cross-company code transaction while posting expense with 2 different company codes.
In the 2 company codes, one company code is setup for Withholding tax and other was not set.
While posting in FB50, I am getting the below message and system does not allow to post the invoice.
Company codes have different settings for withholding tax treatment
Message no. F5786
Diagnosis
You are entering a document containing at least one vendor or customer item and which has line items in several company codes. The extended withholding tax treatment has been set to active in one of these company codes, but not in one of the other company codes.
System Response
You cannot enter this kind of document.
Procedure
Enter the transaction in two documents.
For this I tried to test the transaction by activating of extended Withholding tax for both the company codes. Then the invoice is posting correctly now.
The point is if I activate extended withholding tax for the Company code which is not using the setup, will it face any issues in other areas? and also kindly advice whether is this a right way to set up to fix the current problem.
Thanks for the Support and early response will be appreciated.
JBC.

Hi Mamta,
Thanks for the Response. I think you misunderstood my scenario.
For Eg in FB60 with Co code 5065:
I am debiting the Expenses for Co Code 1000(Witholding tax not active) and crediting the Bank Account of Co Code 5065(Withholding tax setup is done for this co code). When I tried to post with these line items I have getting the error.
Posting        GL                   Co Code
Dr          106520(Exp)            1000
Cr          202020(Bank)           5065
For this I tried by activating the Withholding tax for Co code 1000 which is not active before and post it. The system allows me to post the invoice.
I want to know whether is this a right way to solve this issue and will it impact on any other areas by only activating the Withholding tax for a Co code?
Thanks,
Bapu

Issue with document created with a tax code related to a different Company Code

Hello,
we need to clear a document created with the tax code "YY" which is associated to the Company Code Espana even if the vendor of this document belongs to the Country Portugal.
When we try to clear this documents we get the follow error:
Tax code YY for Country Portugal has been deleted or incorrectly changed
The problem is the tax code exists but it is associated to Company Code Espana and not to the Portugal one
In order to cleare this document should we activate the tax code for Portugal, as well?
Thank You

Hello, Are you trying to post entry having Plant in Portugal? Thanks, Deepanshu

How to create group bom for multiple plants with different company codes

Dear all,
In my current scenario we have 5 Company codes with a plant with each company. The same kind of materials exist in all the 5 plants, so what i want is when i create any BOM, that BOM has to extend in all the company codes, as with GROUP BOM i can able to extend the same in only one company code.
So how to do this?
Thanks in Advance
Bhushan

For that first extend all the materials to all the plants... In one plant create a BOM for the material..
In all other polants in CS01, click COpy from .. There you mention the matreial and the plant in which the BOm is alerady available..
karthick

Cross company subcontrating in sap with same company code

Dear Sir
we have an scinario of cross company subcontrating in sap with same company code , take an example my plat is 1003 and another is 1019 with same company code, so is it possible to do subcontracting ? i will process doccoumntation like j1if01
which i raise with vendor also.
plz send me procedure
regards''
sumit

Yes,you can do subcontracting between plants of same company code.
You need to to treat respective plants as vendors.
SAP process may be
1. Create a subcon p.o (sending plant as vendor)
2. Issue material using MB1B
3. Raise challan using J1IF01 if it is excisable or else print material document(step-2) as delivery challan for reference.
4. Receiving plant will raise sales order based on p.o
5. GR material from issuing plant - MIGO
6. Process material
7. Do Delivery / PGI from receiving plant
8. Do billing or proforma invoice
9. Receive processed material based on p.o
10. Challan reconcillation(not needed if material is non excisable)
11. Invoice for subcontracting work(optional)

Creating Workflows for a Corporation with Different Company Codes

Hi,
We have just done a roll-out for Company A which is part of a big corporation (group of companies).
The system version implemented is ECC 6.0 with modules (HR,MM,FI,DBM)
I have implemented and rolled out several workflows (Leave,PR,PO, Payment approval)for Company A and am now expected to do the same workflows for Company B,the business processes as per flowcharts remain the same as for Company A.
Company A uses company code 1000, while company B will use company code 2000.
Users in Company B will log in to the same PRD servers.
Some approvers of workflow in company A will be responsible for some workflow approvals for staff in company B though HR have completed implementing an org structure for company B.
Is it possible to use the same workflow templates by saving them in a different name and change the agents to reflect company B org,if so how do I go about it?
In future we will also roll-out to Company C.
What is the best way to do it and save time as well.
Thank you.
Missa

Hi
Consider a scenario like EMPB who belongs to CMP B has applied a leave and EMPA manager of EMPB who belongs to CMP A,
Now in order to send the leave request for approval to EMPA you can define or create a rule from PFAC transaction. in such a way that
1. First try to get the initiator details like his personnel number.
2. Once you have the Employee number , by using it you can read hi Org Assignment details from PA0001 to get employee sepecifc compnay code.
3. BAsed on the employee group and sub group you might have to decide who is manager I hope this would be defined already in the org structure.
4. Once you know who is the manager , get his position details and from it get holder and his communications info from PA0105.
IN this way if you define a rule by calling a function module. You can make use of the same workflow. but based on the initiator details you need to dort out the manager.
The simple way is to define and impement the Rules dynamically to fetch the agents based on the Personel are/sub are and employee group and sub group.
Regards
Pavan

How to prevent settlements from AE to wbs with different company code

Hi gurus,
i'm currently facing a problem regarding settlements from activity elements to wbs above.
we have one controllign areas with various company codes.
For some projects, we have wbs assigned to company code A and activity elements assigned to Company A and B.
We have an automatic settlement rule generation so that we settle all activity element costs to wbs. But, for activity elements assigned to company B, we don't want to settle the costs, we want to go through a sd/mm invoicing between the two companies.
How can we prevent the settlement to take place, apart from manually removing the settlement rule for each activity element?
can we put a validation rule that check that whenever the company code in the wbs is different from the one in the activity element, then the settlement doesn't take place? or remove the automatic settlement rule generation and use cjb1 to generate settlement rules only when an activity element as the same company code as the wbs above. would it be possible?
would the WBS_SETTLEMENT_RULE BADI or badi proj be of any help?
Any help is welcome.
regards
tim
Edited by: Tim Ursulet on Jan 22, 2009 5:29 PM

Hi Tim,
The transaction CJB1 or CJB2 creates the settlment rules for WBS only, therefore the transactions and Badi WBS_SETTLEMENT_RULE BADI are NOT relevant for the settlement rules of activity and elements at all.
For the settlement rules of activity (and elements) the default rule is inserted, as soon as the user navigate to the settlemenent rule overview screen, if the activity do not have the settlement rule at that time. I am not sure, if there is BaDi or substituation to prevent the system apply this default rule in certain case. Other alternative is to specify the objects during settlement, e.g. using selection variant with the company code.
Kind regards,
Zhenbo

Project stock exist in a plant and WBS but with different company code

Hello,
As I know I can not create a PO in company A, but was assigned to a WBS maintained in company code B. The system will check if the WBS getting the same company code with the PO, and pop up the error message if the company code was differect.
But seems the project stock could exists in a plant but assign to WBS was maintained with different company code. For example, A material stock was in plant A assigned to company code A, and it is also assigned to WBS belong to company code B.
Any one know it is correct?
Thanks!

I knew crossing company code to assign WBS element to PO is not allowed since i got the error message, and I think it's reasonable, cause the expense from the project PO should post to the same company code through the WBS element.
But why for the inventory crossing company code is allowed? The stock in plant A belong to company code A, was assigned to WBS element B belong to company code B. That means the inventory is in the GL balance of company A but under the profit center belong to company B. How to understand it? I think it's wrong

Creating order with out Company code and plant - just for pricing -possible

Hi gurus
Just for creating sales order (let us say no delivery and no billing, client was not intrested in the initial setup) for just pricing thing, does we really need Company code and plant. with out that just with sales org setup(sale org+D.C) can I create an order to full fil the pricing scenario.
Please I need help on this
Thanks
Kris

hi kris,
we cannot create a order with out company code and plant , due to the following reasons
we do not require the company code to create the order , but we require the plant to create a material and use it in the sales order .and we require a company code to create a customer .
the pricing procedure is determined depending upon the sales area(sales org+distribution channel +division).
please reward the points if it is helpful
Regards,
Murali

Inter company with three company codes

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for