PO created with wrong Company code

Hi Gurus,
I have Plant XXXX assigned to Company code 1111 and
Plant YYYY assigned to Company code 2222
One of the user has created PO with Plant XXXX and company code wrong as 2222.
(we have warning message setup & not error message. So, it allowed user to create PO with wrong Company code and save)
GR & IR both are already posted. I find the accounting document of these GR/IR show correct company code as XXXX-1111 (mostly would have taken correctly based on plant XXXX).
These are service POs (non stock).
Now user wants to change the company code in PO to 1111.
I checked...and system simply allow to change to company code to correct one i.e 1111. It does not give any message.
Could any one give me some additional info.. if it is right to do so? I am not too convinced at this moment.
I was suggesting user to reverse GR, IR, delete PO and create new PO. Is that right?
Thanks n advance for your input.
Best Regards,
Mohan

Dear Mohan,
U can change the company code in PO as it will not have any impact since the GR and IR is completed.
Accounts are hit based on the valution area(valuation grouping code).
Since the PO is already closed u can go ahead the change the same.
Regards,
AM Vahanan

Similar Messages

SRM PO created with wrong company code

Hello,
The users have created several PO in SRM with wrong company code. The user was found in the wrong organization structure during the creation of shopping and approval. The PO did not get transfer to the Back because of this. Is there a way to modify the PO and change the company code.
In case we want to modify it in the tables given that BBP_PD gives you an indication of which table and entry to modify, is there a way to do this operation (like SE16N in ECC)? Have you ever done this and what risk is their in such an operation.
Thank you.

Hi,
I doubt anyone here will (or will dare) suggesting to you how to do it as it is against SAP practise totally. if the document is created wrongly, it should be deleted and approved with all the tracking and changes in place for auditing purposes.
Frankly that is what you should practise as well.. my 2cents opinion.
Regards.
YS

Delivery should not create with out company code data

Hi all,
We have created a customer master without company code data with T code VD01 and subsequently created sales order and delivery with PGI and invoice also saved but no accounting document is getting generated. But we want to stop at delivery only; system should not allow creating delivery. Please do the needful
Thanks in advance
Regards,
Nagesh

hi nagesh,.
from standard SAP it might not be possible.
but check this work around:
after creating the COMPANY CODE DATA by the marketing people only you please go ahead and create a delivery till that time the sales order will be in open status.
if you want to stop it through the SAP system:
then you need to contact TECHNICAL PERSON on the same:
MV45AFZZ : USEREXIT_SAVE_DOCUMENT_PREPARE for checking while creating a delivery if not created then to throw an ERROR message - this is the only probability to check
but he may not be having solution for your query.
except the work around.
please check and confirm
balajia

Vendor Master Creation through IDoc with Multiple Company Codes

I am trying to create vendor masters sent from a 3rd party into SAP using CREMAS05 IDoc. I have the requirement that the vendor should be created in each of 3 company codes and the vendor number is internally assigned in SAP.
I create my IDoc with the general data E1LFA1M and multiple E1LFB1M & E1LFB5M Children. When I post the IDoc using IDOC_INPUT_CREMAS which uses Call Transaction, the vendor gets created for the first company code, but the IDoc errors on the vendor extension XK01 for the next company code with the error: "Fill all required fields SAPMF02K 0111 ADDR1_DATA-NAME1".
In debugging through this, it appears that the vendor number that gets created in the first XK01 transaction does not get passed into the data for the second XK01 call and SAP tries to create a new vendor instead of extending the newly created one.
If I force the value in during debug after the initial call transaction into the variable h_lifnr, it works fine (Vendor created with multiple company codes.
Any help would be greatly appreciated.
-Larry

I cannot give you exact solution, but can guess why this is happening, below is what I believe.
I think Synchronous update is not happening in call transaction, second transaction is getting processed before the first one is saved, debugging it works fine, because we give system enough time to save while processing.
Generally in call transaction we have MODE, if we pass S - then synchronous update happens, in your case, you need to find the way to incorporate this.
Hope it helps.
Regards,
Ravi Kishore.

Issue with document created with a tax code related to a different Company Code

Hello,
we need to clear a document created with the tax code "YY" which is associated to the Company Code Espana even if the vendor of this document belongs to the Country Portugal.
When we try to clear this documents we get the follow error:
Tax code YY for Country Portugal has been deleted or incorrectly changed
The problem is the tax code exists but it is associated to Company Code Espana and not to the Portugal one
In order to cleare this document should we activate the tax code for Portugal, as well?
Thank You

Hello, Are you trying to post entry having Plant in Portugal? Thanks, Deepanshu

Creating order with out Company code and plant - just for pricing -possible

Hi gurus
Just for creating sales order (let us say no delivery and no billing, client was not intrested in the initial setup) for just pricing thing, does we really need Company code and plant. with out that just with sales org setup(sale org+D.C) can I create an order to full fil the pricing scenario.
Please I need help on this
Thanks
Kris

hi kris,
we cannot create a order with out company code and plant , due to the following reasons
we do not require the company code to create the order , but we require the plant to create a material and use it in the sales order .and we require a company code to create a customer .
the pricing procedure is determined depending upon the sales area(sales org+distribution channel +division).
please reward the points if it is helpful
Regards,
Murali

Sourcing: Shows wrong company code and cost center

Hello
We have implemented SRM4.0 SP8. When we display shopping carts in sourcing cockpit before aggregate to create a PO, we check that SC from different companies doesnt show the correct company code and cost center. We have a central purchase group that aggregates SC from different enterprises. For two SC, the second displays a wrong company code and cost center.
Example:
First SC:
SC -> A123
Company -> SNLL
Cost center > AAA
Second SC:
SC -> A124
Company -> SNPP
Const center -> BBB
When displaying the second SC it shows company code SNLL and Cost center AAA each is incorrect. In DB data is correct for each SC, company code (table BBP_PDBEI) and cost center per item (BBP_PDACC). Even if we aggregate both SC to create one PO, this document has correct data per item (different company code, requester, cost center) the only issue is related with the information showed in ITS/HTML in sourcing cockpit before aggregation.
Do you have any idea how can we resolve this?
Thanks in advance

Hi
Seems like a SRM bug.. with the Support pack 8... Try upgrade to latest support pack in SRM system, if possible...
Also Please create a customer OSS message with SAP !!
Do let me know.
Regards
- Atul

How to create a new company code and how to assign it to billing units?

i am working on roll out project.....please help me in creating a new company code....

Hi,
You have raised this query in wrong Forum. Please raise ur query in the relevant forum.
rgrds,
Randhir Soni

PO on vendor not created for a company code

Hi,
When the vendor master is not created for a pur.org., I am getting errror message when I try to create a PO on that vendor/pur.org. combination. But, when the vendor master is not created for a company code, system is allowing me without any error for creating PO on that company code.
I want to set error message for creating PO on a company code for which vendor master is not maintainted. Please let me know the settings required for this.
Thanks.

Hi
Normally it will allow to create PO.
If u r not maintaining the company code settings u can not proceed with the MIRO.
U might have created PO through MK01.... But FI team has to enter the Compnay code related details in XK01
Regards,
Raman
Edited by: Raman S on Mar 13, 2009 11:58 AM

New company integration - Should or not create a new company code?

Hi Gurus,
my customer is acquiring a new company and the related population will be integrated in our sap payroll system.
The FI team is now asking for the creation of a new company code (the new population should be maintained separated from the old one, with a different PMO and budject) but the HR Department does not want to manage (for several internal reasons) a new company code.
Now the question is: is it absolutely necessary to create a new company code or is it possible to manage this situation in another way (maybe linking the new population to a new personnel area, related to an already existing company code)? And what about the posting?
From the payroll point of view, the new population should be managed exactly as the old population. It is just a question to maintain them separated from the FI point of view.
Do you already faced a problem like this? And which is your feedback?
Thanks and Regards,
Gaetano

Creation of new company code is depending on the legal reason...if you legal department and Finance users decide that this new company is a separate legal entity and Profit & Loss will reported separate, Tax Id number is different from parent company, then all this means that this newly acquired company will need a new company code in SAP. Then comes how they want to do the costing...that may also require them to report all the salary cost to this new company code.
Whether it is a new company code or old company code...you would required to identify these new entity as Personnel area or personnel subarea right?
If the Tax id number is different, then it is best recommended to create a separate enterprise structure and bring the employee under the new CC/PA/PSA.
If the tax id is same, only for costing and PnL , then you can use the existing Enterprise structure and override the costing logic using the Substitute cost center or overriding BAdI in HR-FI posting.
Let me know your feedback

*NO AUTHORIZATIONS FOR CREATING ACCOUNTS IN COMPANY CODE*

HI
NO AUTHORIZATIONS FOR CREATING ACCOUNTS IN COMPANY CODE
SYSTEM MESSAGE:
No authorization for creating accounts in company code 3333
Message no. F2305
System Response
You cannot access the requested data.
Procedure for System Administration
If necessary, include an entry in the user's authorization profile for the authorization object and parameters specified below.
Authorization object:
F_KNA1_BUK
Parameter:
Company code: 3333
Actions: 01
KINDLY THROW UR IDEAS

Hi,
You have not been authorized for this transaction. Please speak with your BASIS guy he will give you the authorization.
Regards,
Abhee.

Cross company subcontrating in sap with same company code

Dear Sir
we have an scinario of cross company subcontrating in sap with same company code , take an example my plat is 1003 and another is 1019 with same company code, so is it possible to do subcontracting ? i will process doccoumntation like j1if01
which i raise with vendor also.
plz send me procedure
regards''
sumit

Yes,you can do subcontracting between plants of same company code.
You need to to treat respective plants as vendors.
SAP process may be
1. Create a subcon p.o (sending plant as vendor)
2. Issue material using MB1B
3. Raise challan using J1IF01 if it is excisable or else print material document(step-2) as delivery challan for reference.
4. Receiving plant will raise sales order based on p.o
5. GR material from issuing plant - MIGO
6. Process material
7. Do Delivery / PGI from receiving plant
8. Do billing or proforma invoice
9. Receive processed material based on p.o
10. Challan reconcillation(not needed if material is non excisable)
11. Invoice for subcontracting work(optional)

How to prevent settlements from AE to wbs with different company code

Hi gurus,
i'm currently facing a problem regarding settlements from activity elements to wbs above.
we have one controllign areas with various company codes.
For some projects, we have wbs assigned to company code A and activity elements assigned to Company A and B.
We have an automatic settlement rule generation so that we settle all activity element costs to wbs. But, for activity elements assigned to company B, we don't want to settle the costs, we want to go through a sd/mm invoicing between the two companies.
How can we prevent the settlement to take place, apart from manually removing the settlement rule for each activity element?
can we put a validation rule that check that whenever the company code in the wbs is different from the one in the activity element, then the settlement doesn't take place? or remove the automatic settlement rule generation and use cjb1 to generate settlement rules only when an activity element as the same company code as the wbs above. would it be possible?
would the WBS_SETTLEMENT_RULE BADI or badi proj be of any help?
Any help is welcome.
regards
tim
Edited by: Tim Ursulet on Jan 22, 2009 5:29 PM

Hi Tim,
The transaction CJB1 or CJB2 creates the settlment rules for WBS only, therefore the transactions and Badi WBS_SETTLEMENT_RULE BADI are NOT relevant for the settlement rules of activity and elements at all.
For the settlement rules of activity (and elements) the default rule is inserted, as soon as the user navigate to the settlemenent rule overview screen, if the activity do not have the settlement rule at that time. I am not sure, if there is BaDi or substituation to prevent the system apply this default rule in certain case. Other alternative is to specify the objects during settlement, e.g. using selection variant with the company code.
Kind regards,
Zhenbo

Creating a new Company Code in OMSY.

Hi,
I am trying to create a new Company Code in Transaction OMSY and I need help in working with this screen to create a brand new company code. I tried to look for a 'create' button or a menu item to start creating a new row in this screen, but didn't fine one. Can someone help me? Thanks.

Hi Biswas/Arif/Madhu,
Thanks for your help. First of all ...I am doing this as a proof of concept in a training instance. So, I can mess it as much as I can.
As you all mentioned I created a Company by copying an existing Company in EC01 (which is the T code of the screen that comes from the IMG navigation specified by Madhu). At that point system performed some copying tasks for some time and I guess my New Company got all the G/L Account, Chart Of Accounts from the old (they might not be relevant to the new company, which i will change later).
But my follow up question is ...after all this, I expected to see the new company code in OMSY screen. But I didn't. Why?
TIA.
Subra.

Project stock exist in a plant and WBS but with different company code

Hello,
As I know I can not create a PO in company A, but was assigned to a WBS maintained in company code B. The system will check if the WBS getting the same company code with the PO, and pop up the error message if the company code was differect.
But seems the project stock could exists in a plant but assign to WBS was maintained with different company code. For example, A material stock was in plant A assigned to company code A, and it is also assigned to WBS belong to company code B.
Any one know it is correct?
Thanks!

I knew crossing company code to assign WBS element to PO is not allowed since i got the error message, and I think it's reasonable, cause the expense from the project PO should post to the same company code through the WBS element.
But why for the inventory crossing company code is allowed? The stock in plant A belong to company code A, was assigned to WBS element B belong to company code B. That means the inventory is in the GL balance of company A but under the profit center belong to company B. How to understand it? I think it's wrong

PO created with wrong Company code

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for