Interal Order not flowing to Accounting doc from MM

Hi Gurus,
Need help on one of the issues with FI-MM integration.
1. We have created a MM movement type and posting is enabled to Cost center and Internal order with the movement type.
2. Cost center is automatically derived from OKB9, whereas Internal order is manually input in MB1A.
3. After posting through MB1A ( Goods issue) , the MM document shows both Cost center and Internal order.
4. But the Accounting document shows only "Cost center". "INTERNAL ORDER" is not showing up at all.
(PS : If i try posting to the same GL account directly from FI, it is showing up both "Cost center" and "Internal order")
Any clues on why the Internal order is not flowing to the FI from MM ?
Thanks
Siva

Hi,
Thanks for your reply. The issue is RESOLVED.
I checked the movement type thoroughly. The problem, is caused by the indicator " Check acct.***." on the initial screen of the Movement type.
i checked it and now it is working fine. both cost center and order are flowing to FI /CO as well.
The help on the field is as below:
Check account assignment
Indicates that the account assignment is checked.
Use
If this indicator is set, the system checks whether a G/L account or an
account assignment has been specified on the item screen. If so, the system
copies this data to the posting line.
If this indicator is not set, the system always uses the G/L accounts or
account assignments determined automatically.
Thanks again for your help.
Siva

Similar Messages

Unable to create accounting doc from invoice

HI all,
In creating an accounting doc from an invoice via VF02, i got an error message:
Cost Center SGCA/33150 does not exist on 7/7/2010.
First of all, we don;t have a cost center 3150.
Can anyone suggest why I cannot create an accounting doc ?
Why the message on cost center ?
thanks
Joyce

Hello Joyce
Identify the GL accounts that are likely to be posted ( if the posting were to go through). Typically you will have GL accounts for Trade Sales, Tax payable etc. here.
While displaying them using T code FSS0, click on the' Edit Cost element' tab and go into 'Display Cost Element: Basic screen". Now click on the tab, 'Default Account Assignment' tab and see if the cost center tab has been filled with '33150. If so, remove it. after checking with your FI colleague. Repeat this for all the accounts (likely) to be posted. I am guessing that is the reason.
Let me know how it goes.

Documents which have not flowed through to FI from Purchasing

Does a Transaction exist which will display the documents that have not flowed through to Finance from Purchasing? Similar to VFX3 in Sales.
For example, a MIRO that has a wrong posting date and the document has been saved but has not flowed through to Finance.

You may have to create a report on SAP query, linking RBKP (the incoming invoice table) with BKPF. In BKPF table the invoice document and the fiscal year are concatenated and resides in the field AWKEY as the reference no.
If, for any combination of invoice and fiscal year you do not find a value in BKPF, this could be construed as those that do not have FI document generated.

Line Item Text ( Accounting Doc ) From Billing

Hi Experts,
As i know in Standard process, the Line item text FI Doc ( Accounting Document ) from billing doesn't have any value ( please correct me if i am wrong ).
But in my case there is value in line item text ( billing doc no )
i already check and not found any substistution or userexit, i try to search in customizing but dont have any clue where this text from. please advice where do i have to look.
Thanks,
Ricko

Hello Burak,
Thanks for reply, as i told in the message
right now, there is value in my line item text
it should be blank, but i couldnt find any customizing or anything that cause my line item text filled with billing document number. do you have any idea ?
Thanks,
RIcko
Edited by: Chapii on Mar 19, 2010 5:24 AM

Business Area not populating in Accounting Doc Post Division Change

Hello Friends,
Platofrm: SAP R/3
We created a new Divisions (06) and assigned them to the Material in Plant 155. A new business arae (PTIC)
was also created and assigned to sales are 0020 00 06.
Later we did couple of assignments (Enter Str>Assig>SD>) where we assigned business area to division - Plant - Sales Org
and Dris Channel ) .
Now to validate the changes I am posting a Sales order in sales area 0020 00 10 - to see whether the newly created business area is getting populated or not. Post sales order - delivery- goods issue and _accounting doc - in the accounting document
I dont see the business arae PTIC. Old business area (PTI) is getting populated.
I wanted to know whether Material is controlling the business area in accounting doc and where I am missing the link.
Our aim is to see business area PTIC in final accounting document so that we are sure that the material - whom we assigned division -06 is giving business are ptic.
Please assist and provide suggestions.
George

Hi,
Go to SPRO > Enterprise Controlling > Consolidation > Integration: Preparation for Consolidation > Preparation in the Sender System > Further Settings for Business Area Consolidations > Sales and Distribution
And check the below settings:-
- Assign Rules per Sales Area
- Assign Business Area per Plant and Division
- Assign Business Area per Sales Area
Regards,
SDNer

Sales Orders not flowing in COPA if Credit block is set

We are implementing COPA for reporting in BW. The Billing information is flowing well in COPA. However, we have one issue with Sales Orders. Here is the scenario:
When we create a new Sales Order without any credit blocks, the information is flowing to COPA Tables in R/3. However, if the Sales Order is blocked for Credit reasons, then the Sales Order information is not available in COPA. The moment the Credit block is released we are able to see the info in COPA Tables.
The requirement is to have the Sales Order information availabe in COPA no matter what. Is there a way via which we can make the Sales Order info flow in COPA the moment it is created, no matter it has any blocks.
Any info on this is highly appriciated.
Thanks
Srini

Hi,
I think it is a standard behaviour of Co-PA.Refer the note: 139725
With rgds,
Anil Kumar Sharma .P

Tax not appearing in accounting doc wrt a material document

Hi All,
In one material doc's accounting doc, tax lines are not appearing. I wanted to know how the system picks up the tax code for a material doc posting. Here the posting is an inventory posting.
Regards
Rudra

Basically there has been no tax calculation for an Accounting doc .User wants to know why so?
He is telling why the tax lines are not appearing. As stated above, its a material doc which when posted,
generated the stated accounting doc.The movt type is 702.
Please let me know why there has been no tax line items in the accounting doc.

Business Area is not flowing to Billing Doc Line item

Hi,
Since recently we have observed that in some billing document creation, the business area in sales order line item is not flowing to the billing document line item.
VBRP-GSBER remains blank due to which we face problem in J1IIN txn.
This is not happening in all the cases. There are very few instances where business area is becoming blank in billing document line item.
But when the same billing document is reversed and new billing document is created, the business area flows properly to billing document line item (in VBRP).
Can anybody suggest why such erratic behaviour? And how to resolve the issue?
Thanks and Regards
Ratna

Dear Shiva Ram and Srinath,
Thanks for your reply
I had checked the settings in SPRO. These are OK. The sales order line item is deriving business area properly. But in some cases (not in all the cases) the business area is not flowing to Billing Line Item during billing document creation. It is happening in production server and not in development server.
I intend to use user exit userexit_fill_vbrk_vbrp to fill the VBRP-GSBER col with VBAK-GSBER if VBRP-GSBER is blank during saving the sales bill thro VF01..
Pl. suggest.
Regards
Ratna

Material Document 4916721050 does not inlcude an accounting doc. in MB03

Hi experts I encountered this warning message 'Material Document 4916721050 does not inlcude an accounting document' in tcode MB03 upon clicking Accounting Documents button. Here is what I did..
In transaction MB1B I entered the following values 976 for the movement type, IN3 for Plant, Storage Location is 5000 and then hit enter and then a new screen will appear and then I entered the next values...5005 for Iss. SLoc., 607431 Material, Quantity is 10, UnE is CAS, Batch is TEST2 and then I hit enter again but I encountered a warning message 'Batch TEST2 has already been posted in stock' and I attempted to hit enter and I encountered another warning message again 'For Batch TEST2 of material 607431 IN3, no class could be determined' and then I hit enter for the last time and then I was able to proceed successfully without encountering errors or warning anymore. Upon saving I was then able to generate material document 4916721050. When going to MB03 using the material document generated and mat.doc.year which is 2009 and then entered, an overview of the material document created will appear and then when I click 'Accounting Documents...' button then that's the time that I encountered warning message as stated above..'Material Document 4916721050 does not inlcude an accounting document' . I really need your help on this Please let me know if what went wrong and what should I need to do with this.
Thanks in advance,
Junne Ray

Hello ,
Materials valuation is done at Plant level or at company code level , generally its defined at Plant level
so if the goods movement is done between the storage locations of the same plant there will not be any valuation involved and hence no accounting will be created.
This query should be posted in Forum: ERP - Logistics Materials Management (MM) , this will help you
further.
Thanks and Regards
Shashank

Control accounting doc. from billing

Hello,
for my accountment department, i need that from two positions of one single bill, create two positions in the accounting document. There will be at the same account, but i need two separate postings.
BILL NR. 1
POS 10 MATERIAL A 100 EUROS
POS 20 MATERIAL B 50 EUROS
ACCOUNTING DOC.
ITEM 1 CUSTOMER A 150 EUROS
ITEM 2 ACCOUNT 701000 100 EUROS
ITEM 3 ACCOUNT 701000 50 EUROS
ITEM 4 TAX XX EUROS
This is what i want. Now i get ITEM 2 ACCOUNT 701000 - 150 EUROS. Is it possible to separate the positions?
Thank you.

SPRO - IMG - Financial Accounting - Financial Accounting Global Settings - General Ledger Accounting - Business Transactions - Integration - Sales and Distribution - Perform Document Summarization for Sales and Distribution.

Terms of Payment Not Flowing in P.O from Vendor

Hi Experts,
My client has different Terms of Payment for different Vendors, and those required Terms of payment has been created.
And when i am Creating a vendor from Vendor Master and maintaing the terms of Payment in Vendor master and raising a P.O the assigned Terms of Payment in Vendor Master is not picking in P.O automatically. Could any one suggest any settings are required to pick or flow the maintained terms of payment from Vendor master to Purchase Order ?
Please advice your Valuable inputs.
Best Regards
Javeed
Please suggest your Valuable input on this.
Best Regards
Javeed

Hi,
1] You can create PIR for that vendor and maintain the required payment term.
This payment term will automatically picked up in PO because highest priority is always given to PIR
2] You can also maintain the payment term in personnel settings
3] Also you can maintain payment term for a particular vendor plantwise. in short if you are raising a PO for a particular vendor from plant say XXX, that payment term for that plant will be automatically picked up in the po. Following is the procedure for the same
Display vendor
Go to PURCHASING DATA
EXTRAS
ADD PURCHASING DATA
TICK DATA RELEVANT AT PLANT LEVEL ALLOWED
ENTER
EXTRAS
ALTERNATIVE DATA
CREATE
ENTER PLANT
TICK PURCHASING DATA
ENTER
NOW YOU CAN SEE PLANT BELOW PURCHASING ORG. VG00
NOW CHANGE PAYMENT TERM.
Amol

How can I use LabVIEW to ground floating SCXI-1520 channels (in order not to lose scanning capabilities from the multiplexer)?

Currently I am reading quarter bridge strain with several SCXI-1520s. When in MAX I noticed my values were no longer reading after a certain gage and as I attempted to troubleshoot, found out that the multiplexer in this module will not scan past any open channel (or if it does, channel results are not consistent) for a very logical reason. If I lose a gage, I usually lose any data from any subsequent gages which we really cannot afford.
Are there any suggestions programming in LabVIEW (right now i'm using NI-DAQmx with an analog task set up)so that each time my loop executes, the program will check for any open channels and either not collect that data or change the order of acquisition (i.e. place the open channels last on the scan list?
I'm open to anything that might be of help

Yes, by "open channel" i mean that there is no signal returning from the gage because it has broken off the structure or the signal to the terminal block has been disconnected somehow.
When I lose data, I'm referring to the data that is acquired on following channels. The behavior appears to be fairly random (which was a troubleshooting nightmare ) but usually if a channel is open, then that and those behind it in the scan order do not return any data. It returns a number like 10.357E-6 and I do not pick up any noise or fluctuations. As far as I understand, the multiplexer stops scanning at this point (open channel) because it has nothing to ground to and subsequently "hangs" - not (or randomly) scanning the following channels. I have gone through the bridge configuration and as of yet, have not figured out how to fix this using any hard-wiring techniques. I emailed NI, and was sent a library file to "ground the channels" but it actually resets the Analog input Task I have defined each loop.
I am new to NI-DAQmx so I do not know if this will alter any configurations I already have in MAX for NI-DAQmx. Will it override? I am concerned it will slow my loop time, and also I cannot see the code for this sub.vi so am a little skiddish about using it if i do not know if it can be tailored to my app.
What do you think? Am I on the right path?

Import Standard Purchase Order not picking data when submitted from backend

Hi,
As part of my code, I am inserting Purchase order information in the interface tables with process_code = 'PENDING'. Then using fnd_request , i am triggering the Standard Program for importing these Purchase Orders. The standard program is getting triggered and completing normally. But it is not picking any records. I am calling the program as follows:-
              -- Setting the org_id so that the import program will run for that particular org_id.
              fnd_request.set_org_id(r_org_id.org_id);
               -- Submit the Import Standard Purchase Orders by calling the standard program for respective org_id
              l_req_id := FND_REQUEST.SUBMIT_REQUEST(application => 'PO'
                            ,program      => 'POXPOPDOI'
                            ,description => 'Import Standard Purchase Orders'
                            ,start_time => SYSDATE
                            ,sub_request => FALSE
                            ,argument1 => NULL
                            ,argument2 => 'STANDARD'
                            ,argument3 => NULL
                            ,argument4    => 'N'
                            ,argument5    => NULL
                            ,argument6 => 'APPROVED'
                            ,argument7 => NULL
                            ,argument8 => NULL
                            ,argument9 => NULL
                            ,argument10 => NULL
              COMMIT;
When I am submitting this same program from front end, for the same set of records using the same set of parameters, the records are getting picked.
Any suggestions for this?

Hi
Do you have a copy of your insert statement?
regards

ERP Purchase order not flowing to SNC

Hello experts,
I created few purchase orders in ERP but those are not reflected in SNC system. I checked XML and the error is "Ship-from location missing".
Kindly help.
Regards,
Gulshan
Edited by: Gulshan Yadav on Nov 18, 2011 10:19 AM

Hi Nikhil,
Please see the XML details below:
- <nm:PurchaseOrderERPReplenishmentOrderCollaborationNotificationFault xmlns:nm="http://sap.com/xi/SAPGlobal20/Global" xmlns:prx="urn:sap.com:proxy:Q2T:/1SAI/TAS918AF467E038C7C2B5E3:731">
- <standard>
<faultText>Proxy Class (generated)</faultText>
- <faultDetail>
<severity>information</severity>
<text>Start of inbound processing: PurchOrdERPReplOrderNotification (ID A768C74EBAF69356E10000000A4286C9)</text>
<id>300(/SCA/BIF_ORDER)</id>
</faultDetail>
- <faultDetail>
<severity>information</severity>
<text>Starting process type and party role determination</text>
<id>133(/SCA/BIF_CU)</id>
</faultDetail>
- <faultDetail>
<severity>information</severity>
<text>Process type could not be determined; search for default process type</text>
<id>131(/SCA/BIF_CU)</id>
</faultDetail>
- <faultDetail>
<severity>information</severity>
<text>Default process type (ICH) determined successfully</text>
<id>013(/SCA/BIF_CU)</id>
</faultDetail>
- <faultDetail>
<severity>information</severity>
<text>Starting logical partner role determination</text>
<id>064(/SCA/BIF_CU)</id>
</faultDetail>
- <faultDetail>
<severity>information</severity>
<text>Logical partner role is 'Sold-To Party'</text>
<id>063(/SCA/BIF_CU)</id>
</faultDetail>
- <faultDetail>
<severity>information</severity>
<text>Logical partner role determination has been completed successfully</text>
<id>061(/SCA/BIF_CU)</id>
</faultDetail>
- <faultDetail>
<severity>information</severity>
<text>Process type and party role determination completed successfully</text>
<id>134(/SCA/BIF_CU)</id>
</faultDetail>
- <faultDetail>
<severity>information</severity>
<text>Starting address action determination</text>
<id>070(/SCA/BIF_CU)</id>
</faultDetail>
- <faultDetail>
<severity>information</severity>
<text>No Customizing found; standard action is 'map all addresses'</text>
<id>072(/SCA/BIF_CU)</id>
</faultDetail>
- <faultDetail>
<severity>information</severity>
<text>End of address action determination</text>
<id>071(/SCA/BIF_CU)</id>
</faultDetail>
- <faultDetail>
<severity>information</severity>
<text>Order 4500000424: CreationUserAccountID is provided but ignored by SNC</text>
<id>050(/SCA/BIF_ORDER)</id>
</faultDetail>
- <faultDetail>
<severity>information</severity>
<text>Order 4500000424: CompletenessAndValidationStatusCode is provided but ignored by SNC</text>
<id>053(/SCA/BIF_ORDER)</id>
</faultDetail>
- <faultDetail>
<severity>information</severity>
<text>The active implementation of BAdI '/SCA/BIF_MI_PRODID' 'BEFORE_MASTER_DATA_ACCESS' has been run</text>
<id>080(/SCA/BIF_COMMON)</id>
</faultDetail>
- <faultDetail>
<severity>information</severity>
<text>The active implementation of BAdI '/SCA/BIF_MI_ITMBPRT' 'BEFORE_MASTER_DATA_ACCESS' has been run</text>
<id>080(/SCA/BIF_COMMON)</id>
</faultDetail>
- <faultDetail>
<severity>warning</severity>
<text>Order 4500000424 item 00010: DeliveryPeriodEndDateTime is missing in schedule line 1</text>
<id>090(/SCA/BIF_ORDER)</id>
</faultDetail>
- <faultDetail>
<severity>information</severity>
<text>BOL processing started for Process Type 'ICH' Process Name 'REPLORDER'</text>
<id>000(/SCA/DM_BOL_CON)</id>
</faultDetail>
- <faultDetail>
<severity>information</severity>
<text>Calling BOL Service Class '/SCA/CL_SVORDER'</text>
<id>012(/SCA/DM_BOL_CON)</id>
</faultDetail>
- <faultDetail>
<severity>information</severity>
<text>Starting master data completion</text>
<id>000(/SCA/DM_MDCOMP)</id>
</faultDetail>
- <faultDetail>
<severity>information</severity>
<text>Reading Customizing settings</text>
<id>003(/SCA/DM_MDCOMP)</id>
</faultDetail>
- <faultDetail>
<severity>information</severity>
<text>Customizing profile SREPLORD has successfully been determined</text>
<id>004(/SCA/DM_MDCOMP)</id>
</faultDetail>
- <faultDetail>
<severity>information</severity>
<text>ShipFromLocation determination is switched off in Customizing</text>
<id>040(/SCA/DM_MDCOMP)</id>
</faultDetail>
- <faultDetail>
<severity>information</severity>
<text>End of master data completion</text>
<id>001(/SCA/DM_MDCOMP)</id>
</faultDetail>
- <faultDetail>
<severity>information</severity>
<text>Start: read ODM order</text>
<id>250(/SCMB/ORDER)</id>
</faultDetail>
- <faultDetail>
<severity>information</severity>
<text>End: read ODM order</text>
<id>251(/SCMB/ORDER)</id>
</faultDetail>
- <faultDetail>
<severity>information</severity>
<text>Start: validation framework</text>
<id>254(/SCMB/ORDER)</id>
</faultDetail>
- <faultDetail>
<severity>information</severity>
<text>Validation started for validation profile POC1 (ICH - REPLORDER - HEADER)</text>
<id>606(/SCMB/DM_BOL)</id>
</faultDetail>
- <faultDetail>
<severity>information</severity>
<text>Validation for validation profile POC1 (ICH - REPLORDER - HEADER) was successful</text>
<id>607(/SCMB/DM_BOL)</id>
</faultDetail>
- <faultDetail>
<severity>information</severity>
<text>Validation started for validation profile POC1 (ICH - REPLORDER - ITEM)</text>
<id>606(/SCMB/DM_BOL)</id>
</faultDetail>
- <faultDetail>
<severity>warning</severity>
<text>Order 4500000424, item 00010: Could not assign ship-from location</text>
<id>068(/SCMB/ORDER)</id>
</faultDetail>
- <faultDetail>
<severity>error</severity>
<text>Order 4500000424 item 00010: ship-from location missing</text>
<id>007(/SCMB/ORDER)</id>
</faultDetail>
- <faultDetail>
<severity>warning</severity>
<text>Validation for val. prof. POC1 (ICH, REPLORDER, ITEM) ended with errors and warnings</text>
<id>608(/SCMB/DM_BOL)</id>
</faultDetail>
- <faultDetail>
<severity>information</severity>
<text>End: validation framework</text>
<id>255(/SCMB/ORDER)</id>
</faultDetail>
- <faultDetail>
<severity>information</severity>
<text>Start: write ODM order</text>
<id>252(/SCMB/ORDER)</id>
</faultDetail>
- <faultDetail>
<severity>information</severity>
<text>End: write ODM order</text>
<id>253(/SCMB/ORDER)</id>
</faultDetail>
- <faultDetail>
<severity>error</severity>
<text>BOL processing failed. XML-message inbound processing has been terminated</text>
<id>002(/SCA/DM_BOL_CON)</id>
</faultDetail>
- <faultDetail>
<severity>information</severity>
<text>End of inbound processing: ReplenishmentOrderNotif. for PO collaboration</text>
<id>034(/SCA/BIF_ORDER)</id>
</faultDetail>
</standard>
</nm:PurchaseOrderERPReplenishmentOrderCollaborationNotificationFault>
Thanks & Regards,
Gulshan

STO pricing- FREIGHT COST NOT CAPTURED IN ACCOUNTING DOC

Hi...
I HAVE a requirement where i have to transport Material from one plant to another withen the same company code using sto delivery root,
the freight cost shoud be captured in seperate GL account, thus i have maiantined FR1 in pricing and assigned FRC1 condition type, i have maintained FRC1 as stastical as i dont want the freight cost to be added to material cost,
when i create STO and add FRC1 condition type, and do goods issue the price in the FRC1 condition type is not getting captured in the accouing document..
i have maintained OBYC setting for FR1 as well
Could anyone tell me where am i going wrong.

HI,
Check your Pricing Procedure in M/08 whether you have given FRE for your Act Key & FR1 for your Accrls key in your Freight Condition type FRC1 & also check the G/L account assignments in OBYC for the same.
Thanks & Regards,
SAP FC

Interal Order not flowing to Accounting doc from MM

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for