Intercompany scenario error

Hello All,
I am getting a error while executing Intercompany scenario.
the details as below,
I have two sales org-
2000 / US / US -- selling org and Plant is 2000 , CC- US01
3000 / MX / MX--- delivering org and Plant is 3000, CC-MX01
I have completed the config for Intercompany, when I try to create order with selling org and try to put the plant at item level- 3000 ( delivering plant belongs to different company code)
I am getting error like Sales ares 2000 / US / 10 is not defined , I am surprised with this message. where division 10 comes from? as I have checked Division is maintain in Material is US.
can you help me out on the issue.
also provid me inputs on Assign organizational unit by plant--   for which plant we need to assign sales org and which sales org??
at present I have assigned delivering plant to selling org, is this correct?
Regards,
Abhijit

Check your config for sales doc at
Use Tcode SPRO
>IMG - SD - Sales - Sales Doc - Sales Doc Header - Assign Sales Area to Sales Doc Type
Info - Assign Sales Area To Sales Document Types
In this menu option, you allocate the allowed order types to each sales area group.
You do not need to make any entries at all if all the sales order types are allowed for each of your sales areas.
If you wish to check allowed sales document types, you must set up common sales areas. This means you must define common sales organizations, common distribution channels and common divisions. If, for example, you have define common divisions, then you must also define common distribution channels and sales organizations.
Example 1 (simplest case):
Only the sales document type "standard order" (OR) should be allowed for a specific sales area <0001/01/01> (that means: sales organization 0001, distribution channel 01, division 01). The following activities are required for this:
1.1) Activity "group together sales organizations":
     Sales org.  Ref.sales org.
     0001        0001
1.2) Activity "group together distribution channel":
     Sales org.  Distr.ch.  Distr.ch.  Doc.type
     0001        01         01
1.3) Activity "group together divisions":
     Sales org.  Division  Division Doc.type
     0001        01        01
1.4) Activity "assign allowed order types to sales areas":
     Ref.sales  Distr.ch.  Division Sales doc.type
     0001       01         01       OR
Example 2:
The above settings should also be used for the sales area <0002/01/01>. In addition, the following activities required:
2.1) Activity "group together sales organizations":
     Sales org.  Ref.sales org.
     0002        0001
2.2) Activity "group together distribution channels":
     Sales org. Distr.ch.  Distr.ch. Doc.type
     0002       01         01
2.3) Activity "group together divisions":
     Sales org. Division  Division  Doc.type
     0002       01        01
In the activity "assign allowed order types to sales areas", there is nothing else to do.
Example 3:
The above settings should also be used for the sales area <0002/01/02>. In addition, the following setting is also required:
3.1) Activity "group together divisions":
     Sales org. Division  Division Doc.type
     0002       02        01
Further activities are not necessary.
Requirement - The sales organizations, distribution channels and divisions which you wish to use for grouping must be defined.
Activities -
1. Enter your group sales organization in the sales organization field.
2. Set the respective group distribution channel in the distribution channel field.
3. Enter your group division in the division field.
4. Set the sales document type permitted for this group sales area during the order entry in the sales document type field.
Thanks & Regards
JP

Similar Messages

  • Rfc to file scenario error in sm58

    rfc to file scenario error in sm58
    i get the error as com.sap.aii.afccommunication.RfcAfwException
    :look up of alternative

    hey
    >>i have a doubt do we have to use
    starting new task or back ground destination
    well it depends upon the logic ur gonna implement,both are used for async RFC so u have to see ur requirement and then decide.
    have a look at the following
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw2004s/helpdata/en/22/042578488911d189490000e829fbbd/frameset.htm
    thanx
    ahmad

  • Shipment cost in Intercompany scenario

    Dear all.... here's my scenario:
    a) We have 2 company codes (001 and 002)
    b) 002 has no stocks, all the stocks are in 001
    c) All the sales of 002 generates a weekly invoice from 001 to 002 (the intercompany scenario works fine).
    d) We need to post the shipment cost in the sales office's cost center, but the cost center the system takes is from 001 (from the plant).
    We make configuration in OKB9 (Cost Element = 611001 "Sales freight", with mandatory field profit center (a cost center for each benefit center)
    In normal scenario in company code 001 the shipment cost assignation works ok.
    Any advice?

    Finally, i get the data in tables and makes corrections manually.

  • Intercompany scenario in manufacturing

    We're in the manufacturing business with several companies in US and Mexico. As we roll out SAP at a Mexico location, we need to prorotype an intercompany scenario. Manufacturing of some of our products is started in the US and is completed in Mexico. We were hoping to use Intercompany functionality, but it seems that it is working only with finished goods. I.e. if we sell one product from US and one product from Mexico then it would work. But we sell one product, it's just manufactured in two locations.
    We explored an option to enter 2 materials instead of one (IS and Mexico pieces separately), but this would mess up the reporting,  require customer service re-training, etc.
    In another company on a different SAP box we use the following process:
    - sales order and production order are created in the US company
    - subcontracting purchase order is created for Mexico company
    - Mexico company creates their own sales order/delivery/invoice and completes their piece
    - US company completes their delivery and invoice.
    Since in this case US and Mexico companies will be in the same box, we were hoping to avoid implementing the same scenario because it involves many additional documents (POs, SOs, etc.).
    Is there any way to utilize Intercompany functionality in our scenario? If not, is there any way to simplify the process described above?
    We've done a lot of research and are at the end of our wits right now. Any suggestions would be appreciated.
    Thank you.

    Hi
    This is just a wild thought about the process to be mapped...
    I am thinking about using both Intercompany and Third Party sales processes to map the requirement.
    Scenario 1: If the Mexican plant has to make the delivery to customer...the Mexican plant will be selected as the delivering plant in the sales order and the availability check happens as per the lead time required to receive the partially processed material (raw material for Mexican plant) from US and other lead times and the finished goods should be delivered to the customer directly.
    Scenario: If the US plant has to make the delivery to customer...the US plant will be selected as the delivering plant in the sales order...a different item category should be determined (like TAS) and a PR should be generated automatically like third party process and the non SD people should take care of getting the finished good from Mexican plant to US plant (sending the semi finished product and getting the finished good).
    This can just be an input for your thoughts.
    Thanks,
    Ravi

  • Multiple Intercompany scenario

    Hi experts,  i have a question.
    Im trying to create an intercompany process.
    I have seven company codes (A, B, C, D, E, F,G) and each company code has its own Plant (P1, P2, etc) and one sales organization per company code (SO1, SO2, etc)
    Co. code-->  Sales org. -->   Plant
    A   -->               SO1       -->        P1
    B   -->               SO2       -->       P2
    C   -->               SO3       -->        P3
    D   -->               SO4       -->        P4
    E   -->               SO5       -->        P5
    F   -->               SO6       -->        P6
    G   -->              SO7       -->        P7
    My process require that I can make intercompany sales in all ways, that means that the Company code A can ship from all the plants (P1, P2, P3,P4, P5, P6, P7); The company code B can ship from all the plants too... and so on.
    i have make my configuration but when I arrive to the menu path  IMG>Sales and distribution>billing>intercompany billing>assingn organizational units by plant-->assing organizational units to the plant
    I only can see here the seven plants and the possibility to assing only one sales area (sales organization + distribution channel + division) to only one plant. I can only make seven combinations instead of being able to make 42 combinations for all my intercompany scenarios.(all the plants will all the sales areas)  Could you please tell me what is missing or why i cant configure intercompany scenarios for all my sales area? what is the problem?
    PS, I have already assigned all the plants to all the sales organizations in the menu path IMG-->enterprise structure > assignment>sales and distribution--> assign sales organization-distribution channel-plant
    thanks in advance and i hope you can help me.
    Alberto
    Edited by: omtorre on Oct 20, 2011 8:19 AM

    Hi Alberto,
    I think this should be possible. If I have understood correctly, when the SO1 (creates a sales order in SO1DC1) delivers some goods from P3 then the interco billing should happen from Company Code C to A and then the customer invoice from A to the end customer (in case of intercompany sales) Similarly, if SO4 delivers goods from P7, then the interco billing will happen from company code G to D and then the customer invoice follows. For doing this, you need 49 (not just 42 as you have mentioned) combinations. Assign SO1DC1 --->P1 first and then assign all other 6 plants to SO1+DC1. So, toatlly 7 combinations foe each Sales Org.
    If the above way doesn't work, then I have a work around which involves some enhancements if your client allows extra budget for this :-). Let me know, I can give you that in detail.
    Regards,
    Raghav

  • Intercompany Billing Error

    Dear All,
    I have configured intercompany billing. Intercompany billing types are two. 1 is Order related invoice. This is between Ordeingcompany to customer. 2nd invoice for Delivery related invoice. This is between Suplying company to Ordering Company. Once i created sales order after goods issue. Supplying party will create invoice for Customer(Sales Order Related Invoice) and Delivery party will be create invoice for Supplying company(Delivery Related Invoice). I am able to create sales order related invoice i.e suplying company to customer. But i am unable to create invoice for Delivery related (Supplying company to Ordering company) while creating Invoice the erroe log is : The document is not relavant for billing. I have checked the delivery documnet type & copy controls there i couldn't find any mistake. But i am suspectng in our delivery type we maintain sales order related invoice. Is it the reason to getting error. Please suggest me. Error:  The document is not relavant for billing.
    Thanks in advance,
    Anjali

    Dear Anjali,
    I ve tried this scenario n its working fine. I.e.
    1.Order Related Invoice------Ordering company to customer.
    2. Intercompany Invoice-----Delivery Related.
    A.Make sure to extend internal customer to both company codes.
    B.Check Intercompany type---if u r using ur own.
    C.VF04---Mark intercompany & enter sold to party & then execute.
    D.Check in Billing type that No posting Block Should be there .
    E.Check Item category in vov7
    Revert if not resolved.
    Regards
    Amit Gupta

  • IDOC-XI-FILE Scenario: Error in ABAP Mapping

    Dear All,
    I am working on IDOC-XI-Flat FIle scenario in which I am using ABAP Mapping as per document "How To Convert an IDoc-XML
    structure to a flat file and vice versa in XI 3.0".
    I created one customized Idoc for this. The Idoc is reacing XI but its flat file is not getting created. Its giving me following error:
    <SAP:Stack>Error in mapping program Z_ABAP_MAPPING_PACKING_LIST (type SAP-ABAP, kernel error ID UNCAUGHT_EXCEPTION) An exception with the type CX_SY_REF_IS_INITIAL occurred, but was neither handled locally, nor declared in a RAISING clause Dereferencing of the NULL reference.</SAP:Stack>
      <SAP:Retry>M</SAP:Retry>
    I have also gone thru threads posted for the same topic earlier but still I am not been to resolve this error.
    Please help me out in resolving this error.
    Regards,
    N.Jain

    HI,
       Log saying that, u have problem in the mapping program.
      i.e Z_ABAP_MAPPING_PACKING_LIST
       the problem is due declaration of data.
       i hope that, you have some methods.
       those are declared under intialization section in mapping program.
      please use start of selection before the method.
    other wise, it will come under intilization section.
    warm regards
    mahesh.

  • MM-SUS Scenario---Error while posting the PO in SUS System from R/3 system.

    Hi All,
    An error occurred within an XI interface: Exception occurred:BBP_PD:004 -Partner 0000003000 not found E:BBP_PD:147 -Enter a country for partner 0000003000 with type 'Sold-to Party' Programm: CX_BBP_BD_ERROR===============CP; Include: CX_BBP_BD_ERROR===============CM002; Line: 57
    The above is problem occurred in SUS system. I have checked the message SXMb_MONI Tcode for XML message.
    Can any one suggest what could be the problem and the solution for the same.
    we are working on MM-SUS scenario (Plan Driven Procurement).
    Thanks
    Jagan

    Hi
    <b>Please go through the links below -></b>
    purchase order doesn't create in srm sus
    purchase order not create in sus
    Enter a country for partner with type 'Sold-to Party'
    BBP_BUPA_SUPPLIER:101
    Unable to determine logical system of sender
    Help MM-SUS!
    SUS-MM:PO not transferred to SUS--message:'sold to party'
    Error in SUS PO creation
    Re: PO error in SUS-MM Scenario
    Cancellation from SUS hangs in XI interface
    Regards
    - Atul

  • Error while transfering PO in extended Scenario -- error 06 053 in R/3

    Hi,
    while transfering a PO from SRM to R/3 in extended Scenario we get an error in RZ20(SRM):
    "No selectable items exist for purchase requisition xxx" --> error number 06 053
    Whats happening here?
    The PR is released in R/3 and yet not transfered into another PO.
    Material and Material Group are the same, there is no contract involved and no differences within PO to PR.
    Any ideas how to solve this problem?
    Thanks and best regards
    Andreas

    Hi muthu,
    thanks, that seems not to be the problem.
    By using the fbgendat report in backend I found out, that R/3 seems to interprete my SRM PO as a local PO?!
    Might there be a problem in SRM when calling the function module BBP_PO_BAPI_STATE within method set_po_bapi_state_in_be  (class CL_BBP_BS_ADAPTER_PO_CRT)?
    Seems R/3 does not interprete my PO out of SRM as a SRM PO?
    Does the RFC User needs additional roles for setting the BAPI_PO_STATE in R/3? (the RFC User does not have sap_all in R/3!)
    Best regards
    Andreas

  • Standalone Scenario - Error during Creation of Local Purchase Order

    Hi All,
         I am trying to setup Standalone Scenario, i have created all the master data locally, i am able to Order SC, but after workflow approval SC goes into error 'Error during creation of local purchase order from shopping cart XXXXXXXXX'
         I have created following configuration setting for local PO number
    1) In SPRO -> Cross-Application Basic Settings -> Number Ranges -> Define Number rang. for Schopping Carts and Follow-on Doc. --- i have number ranges for PO follow-on doc. i.e.
    inrerval No = PO, from number = 0004000000, to number = 0004999999, ext. = unchecked
    2) In SPRO -> Cross-Application Basic Settings -> Number Ranges -> Define Ranges per backend system for follow-on documents PO, PR etc
    3) In sourcing (SPRO -> Cross-Application Basic Settings -> Sourcing -> Define Interactive Sourcing for product categories) ---  sourcing is never carried out.
    Can anybody help?
    Regards,
    SAP Guy.
    Edited by: SAP Guy on Apr 23, 2008 2:32 AM

    Hi SAP Guy,
    Following steps are must for Local number range
    1) Create number range for local PO
    2) Maintain your logical system in 'Define number range per backend system for follow on document'
    3) Define Transaction Type for BUS2201, define document type (e.g. EC1)
    4) Assign Document type (EC1) in Org attribute BSA.
    Hope this helps.
    Regards,
    Manish.

  • R/3(MM) -XI- SUS Scenario Error

    Hello,
    I'm working on SRM Integration: R/3(MM) to SUS Scenario
    Whenever i post a PO message to SUS from R/3 (MM module), I see the following error in SXMB_MONI:
    ERROR:
    <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?><!-- Call Inbound Proxy --> <SAP:Error xmlns:SAP="http://sap.com/xi/XI/Message/30" xmlns:SOAP="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/" SOAP:mustUnderstand=""><SAP:Category>Application</SAP:Category><SAP:Code area="ABAP">APPLICATION_ERROR</SAP:Code><SAP:P1/><SAP:P2/><SAP:P3/><SAP:P4/><SAP:AdditionalText/><SAP:ApplicationFaultMessage namespace="http://sap.com/xi/SRM/Basis/Global">StandardMessageFault</SAP:ApplicationFaultMessage><SAP:Stack>The application triggered an exception
    </SAP:Stack><SAP:Retry>M</SAP:Retry></SAP:Error>
    TRACE:
    "An error occured within an XI interface: SLD system SNT_BS is not known Programm: SAPLBBP_BD_MAPPING_SAPXML1; Include: LBBP_BD_MAPPING_SAPXML1F1Y; Line:92 "
    Can anyone help me resolve this problem ?
    Thanks,
    Regards,
    Sridhar

    Hi,
    Thanks for the reply Vishnu. No i didn't create those OSS messages
    I just now found the reason and resolved the problem.
    Let me describe the reason for the problem:
    In the SRM box, values for the "System Landscape Directory Names" (Business System Names) in the "Definition of backend systems in B2B" were not entered.
    Txn : SPRO
    SAP Reference IMG> Supplier Relationship Manager>Supplier Self Services>Technical Settings>Define Backend Systems.
    Regards,
    Sridhar

  • Sender RFC Scenario Error:Payload Is Missing

    I am facing an issue in 'RFC2JDBC' scenario which is mentioned below:
    here our scenario is 'RFC2JDBC'.here our 'RFC' is having 2 fields in tables parameter
    i.e. empno & empname.
    the results of the 'RFC' is coming as:
    Personnel Number  Employee Name
    00000100                 Rasmiraj
    00000200                 Tanmay
    00000300                 Kanhu
    00000400                Debabrata
    00000500                shantanu
    i am triggering the 'rtfc' through a program.
    when i am triggering the 'RFC',in monitor of PI it's coming as sucessful.however in the payload one of the field value is missing i.e. employee name.(same also updating in the legacy database)
    in the payload it's appearing as:
    [  <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
    - <rfc:ZSAM_SEND_RFC_PI xmlns:rfc="urn:sap-com:document:sap:rfc:functions">
    - <EMP_DTLS>
    - <item>
      <EMPNO>00000100</EMPNO>
      <EMPNAME />
      </item>
    - <item>
      <EMPNO>00000200</EMPNO>
      <EMPNAME />
      </item>
    - <item>
      <EMPNO>00000300</EMPNO>
      <EMPNAME />
      </item>
    - <item>
      <EMPNO>00000400</EMPNO>
      <EMPNAME>a</EMPNAME>
      </item>
    - <item>
      <EMPNO>00000500</EMPNO>
      <EMPNAME />
      </item>
      </EMP_DTLS>
      </rfc:ZSAM_SEND_RFC_PI> ]
    please,suggest.(here,we are using sender 'RFC' communication channel & an 'RFC'destination of type 'T'(with parameter registered server program,gateway host,gateway service)

    Hi rasmiraj tripathy,
    I am also facing the same problem (Sender or Payload is missing) while integrating R3 to B1 using IDOC. When I resend IDOC, it capture by B1iSN but doesn't work, it gives me error. When I look into xml document, it is found that there is no receiver payload.
    My R3 system is non-unicode and it is difficult to change it to unicode as it requires updation.
    Can you please confirm that this error is coming due to Non-Unicode, and can be resolved by setting it to Unicode.
    Note: There is no double definition of any object.

  • IDOC to SOAP asynchronous scenario Error handling

    Need an expert!!!!!!!!! advise on  error handling for IDOC--PI--
    SOAP scenario.This is a asynchronous scenario where PI is calling a Legacy system using SOAP adapter.My question is how i can do error handling in this scenario.If i get an alert in pi with payload variable that would be fine, do i need to use BPM and if that is tthe case what will be steps.
    Appreciate your help.
    Manish

    Hello Manish,
    My question is how i can do error handling in this scenario.
    Use the standard alert framework. Search on SDN / SAP Help for details.
    do i need to use BPM and if that is tthe case what will be steps.
    BPM is not required to raise alerts, as this is an async call.
    Regards,
    Neetesh

  • Idoc to file scenario error

    Hell Experts,
    I have done desgin and configuration from Idoc to File Scenario in XI Intergration server.
    Source is R/3 and Target system is File. I have successfully configured each and every step. Send Idoc from R/3 to Intergration server and run sxi_cache. But  I didn't get successful results, always the error message shows in SXMB_MONI as follows:
    Ackn Status  contains system error
    During the application mapping com/sap/xi/tf/_CUST_MMAP_ a com.sap.aii.utilxi.misc.api.BaseRuntimeException was thrown: RuntimeExcep
    tion in Message-Mapping transformatio~
    Exception of class CX_XMS_SYSERR_MAPPING
    My system Patche level as follows:
    SAP_BASIS     640        0012        SAPKB64012
    SAP_ABA     640     0012                SAPKA64012
    PI_BASIS     2004_1_640 0009        SAPKIPYI69
    SAP_BW     350     0009                SAPKW35009
    The above error is related to patches problems or any Mapping  problems ?
    Please  help me.
    Advanced Thanks.
    Regards,
    Chandra

    Hi,
      This may be a mapping issue, try this:
    a)in interface mapping see if grids are formed at source and target after executing the test option,
    b)also take the xml of the idoc from sxmb_moni , copy it and paste it at the source of the mapping ( use the src tab now) and execute the mapping, is your file structute formed?
    i am not sure of the patch levels.
    Regards,
    Anirban.

  • File to IDOC scenario error...

    Hi all,
    we hhave created an File to Idoc scenario .
    we are getting the following error in SXMB_MONI t-code.
    <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
    - <SAP:Error xmlns:SAP="http://sap.com/xi/XI/Message/30" xmlns:SOAP="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/" SOAP:mustUnderstand="">
      <SAP:Category>XIAdapter</SAP:Category>
      <SAP:Code area="IDOC_ADAPTER">ATTRIBUTE_INV_SND_SERV</SAP:Code>
      <SAP:P1>BUS_SENDER</SAP:P1>
      <SAP:P2 />
      <SAP:P3 />
      <SAP:P4 />
      <SAP:AdditionalText />
      <SAP:ApplicationFaultMessage namespace="" />
      <SAP:Stack>Unable to convert sender service BUS_SENDER to an ALE logical system</SAP:Stack>
      <SAP:Retry>M</SAP:Retry>
      </SAP:Error>
    can any one plz say wat this error might be..
    TIA
    Regards,
    Raj

    Hi,
    The problem occurs when sender and receiver business system or business service does not have a logical system name.
    ID - Integration Directory
    Posting the IDOC'S into SAP R/3 System, sender and receiver business system or business service requires the logical system name. If the business system (Web As ABAP) does not have the logical system name, then add the logical system for business system.
    If business system type = Web AS ABAP, then add the Logical system in Technical System level and Save.
    If business system type = Third-Party, then add the logical system in business system level and Save.
    If the business service does not have the logical system name in ID, it needs to be configured as follows.
    Go to ID and click the Business service -> Services -> Adapter Specific Identifiers. Enter the logical system name and Save.
    Apply and activate.
    hope this will help you.
    regards
    Aashish Sinha
    PS : reward points if helpful

Maybe you are looking for

  • How can i run wireless internet when using windows xp on my imac?

    I recently installed Windows XP on my imac using Boot Camp, everything works great except the internet. ive been looking but i have found no way to get the internet to work via my wireless connection, or is it just not possible? Could it be that i am

  • Server Error in '/' Application. Help?

    I just got an iMac yesterday for school, and I can't access my homework page. It works on Google Chrome but with Safari I keep getting this message. I've been using a MacBook Pro until now and I've never had a problem with accessing the site. I've tr

  • I have windows xp and I want firefox 3.6.4 off of my PC NOW.

    I have windows xp 3 and I want to uninstall firefox 3.6.4 from my PC now. I have used it a few weeks and it repeatedly crashes. I want it removed immediately. I would rather use IE 8. == This happened == Every time Firefox opened == i am online about

  • How do I identify SIM card number in iPad?

    I know how to reveal the number for my SIM in iPad 2 by going into "Settings". But I'm having difficulties to do the same with the next generation of iPad, i.e. iPad with Retina Display model. Would appreciate if someone could guide me on this please

  • EREC: Internal Error while logging in using Registered External Candidate

    Hi, We are on ECC 6.0 EHP 5 & ERECRUIT 605 (0005) and EP 7.0 SP22. I'm on the final stages of config on Production system for eRec applications, all works fine and ready for LIVE except the below functionality: 1. i've registered 2 uses as external c