Interest not on Aging reports

Hi, how do I get the Interet column to show on the aging summary report screen. (this is when you run the customer aging report to the SAP B1 screen) In another system this column is visible but I cannot for the life of me get it to show on another system. It is not in form settings as it is not possible to select on the summary screen and I tried searching the forums...no luck and SAP notes, no luck
Version 2007A Sp01 p5
Thanks for your help!

Mainly the defaults as they show...
Customers I leave wide open
All for groups
No Properties
Aging date is today
Interval is Days = 30 (tried all Intervals)
Dates usually by Posting Date (tried Due Date)
Display Zero balances and Reconciled Trans both UNchecked

Similar Messages

Aging Report does not match Balance Sheet Receivables/Payables Account

Hi experts,
I am requesting your help to find out why our customer receivables/vendor payables aging reports total does not match our balance sheet accounts receivable/ accounts payable account for the same period.
I would expect
Customer Receivables Aging Report Total = Balance Sheet Accounts Receivables Account
Vendor Aging Report Total = Balance Sheet Accounts Payables Account
Thank you.
Jane

When you run the report with an ending/aging date in the past (like the end of last month), if you do not display BP's with zero balances, it will leave out BP's who have a zero balance AT THE TIME YOU RUN THE REPORT. Some of them may have had a non-zero balance at the end of the month, but they will be left off anyway. So if a customer owed money on the last day of the month and he paid it on the first of the next month, his balance will not be shown on the report if you run it even one day later.
I feel this is a design defect in the report, but it is the system behavior.
Marcia

Vendor Aging Report to show zero balance does not show all vendors

Hi all,
I would like to see a list of all my vendors in the Vendor Aging Report. I clicked on show vendors with zero balance, however, I still only get a partial list of the vendors. Is there a setting I need to set to show all the vendors? Any advice would be appreciated.
Thank you!
Jane

Hi,
I think your requirement is you want all vendors displayed irrespective of the transactions entered for that Business Partner.
The Aging Report will display only those BPs which have transactions posted to them.
The function of 'Display Vendors with zero balance' checkbox is that it behaves like a selection creteria and leads to inclusion
of all those Business Partners who do not have a balance as of the current date but had a balance on the selected backdate.
example :
If a vendor has a balance as on 01.08.08 and is paid on 10.08.08, then the vendor will not be included in aging report (when run on 01.08.08) unless "Include Vendors with zero balance" is checked.
This checkbox does not allow you to display all the vendors created in the database.
Regards,
Jitin
SAP Business One Forum Team

Vendor Ref. no. not displayed in print preview in vendor aging report

Dear SAP team,
Vendor reference number is not displayed in print preview/print on vendor liabliteis aging report,
but this vendor reference number actually show in report,We are taking report by journal postings,
vendor reference entered in NumAtCard in AP invoice get copied to Ref2 in Journal Entry,then
why it is not showing in print preview/print.
Whether this is an application error / missing functionality ?
We are using SAP Business One 2005 B (7.40.252) SP: 00 PL: 36.
Whether upgrade to latest patch 2005B PL46 will solve this issue ?
Jeyakanthan

Hello Jeyakanthan,
I would like to draw your attention to the enhancements we delivered within Aging Report in 2007 version and plan for 8.8 release.
The primary enhancement in 2007 version is reflecting new concept of Internal Reconciliation with more convenient backward reporting.
Within the 8.8 release ...
- when you generate the aging report you can group the report by customer or sales employee in the customer receivables aging report, and by vendor or buyer in the vendor liabilities aging report;
- when the aging report has been generated, you can view multicustomer/multivendor detailed information in the aging report window. There is no need to double-click each customer/vendor row to view the details.
We would strongly to recommend you to upgrade to 2007 version or join the ramp-up of 8.8 release soon.
Peter Dominik
B1 Solution Management

Vendor ref. no. not appearing in print preview of vendor aging report

Dear all,
Vendor reference number is not appearing in print preview of vendor ageing report,we have
customized template AGE3 collection report,we have taken print outs before a month,vendor
reference number get printed in report,now it is not appearing
What could be problem ?
Any one faces this issue ?
We are using SAP Business One 2005 B (7.40.252) SP: 00 PL: 41.
Latest patch upgrade to PL:46 will solve the issue ?
Jeyakanthan

hi all,
Thru a workaround i brought up vendor reference number in print preview/print,
Applied formatted search in journal remarks of ap invoice thru query
SELECT $[OPCH.NumAtCard]
,this will populate vendor ref. no in journal remarks
which can be displayed in details in aging report.
Is there any solution other than above to bring vendor reference number in print ?
Jeyakanthan

AGEING REPORT NOT UPDATING

After made partly payment to an invoice of vendor, and proecessed it in the outgoing payment, why the ageing report does not reflect the balance of the that particular invoice, instead of showing the original amount and the payment, which makes the ageing report very long and confused. How can I solve this problem? thanks.

There is no problem with AP balance. After payment made, it is reduced. The only one that remain unchanged is doc status. it is still open since the payment is partial. I suggest to cancel the payment and then repaying again. If problem still persists it will be bugs in the PL you are currently using.
Rgds,

Aging report not picking write data

Hi,
My requirement is for vendor 122 within certain period for certain ekorg-c100
and D100 show different amount.
is it possible for vendor aging report.
I developed a vendor aging report for displaying comp-code, vendor, Pur-org,
Total-amount, month wise amount picking from bsik-dmbtr.
I added a field EKORG ( Pur Org ) from lfm1 table with D100 and C100.
And total amount for vendor 122 for a period from 01.01.2009 to 09.09.2009 is 5000/- Rs.
when a new P.O. is crated using Ekorg C100 of amount 2000/-.
My problem is :
After execution of report for same vendor 122 with ekorg c100.
Then it shouid show 7000/- Rs.
And After execution of report for same vendor 122 with ekorg D100.
Then it shouid show 5000/- Rs.
My report is showing same amount in both d100 and c100.
My report is showing same amount 7000/- in D100 and C100 for vendor 122.
Amount picking Bsik table has not ekorg field.
Please let me know how can i do that ?

Thanks for replying. I am sending more info regarding my object.
My requirement is for vendor 122 within certain period for certain ekorg-c100
and D100 show different amount.
is it possible for vendor aging report to show purchase organization wise amount for particular vendor and amount ?
tables , lfa1, lfm1, bsik.
I developed a vendor aging report for displaying comp-code, vendor, Pur-org,
Total-amount, month wise amount picking from bsik-dmbtr.
I added a field EKORG ( Pur Org ) from lfm1 table with D100 and C100.
Report is working fine for displaying Purchase organization.
And total amount for vendor 122 for a period from 01.01.2009 to 09.09.2009 is 5000/- Rs.
when a new P.O. is crated using Ekorg C100 of amount 2000/-.
My problem is :
After execution of report for same vendor 122 with ekorg c100.
Then it shouid show 7000/- Rs.
And After execution of report for same vendor 122 with ekorg D100.
Then it shouid show 5000/- Rs.
My report is showing same amount in both d100 and c100.
My report is showing same amount 7000/- in D100 and C100 for vendor 122.
Amount picking Bsik table has not ekorg field.
Please let me know how can i do that ?

Aging report and Control account value not matching

Hi All
The value what i am getting from Vendor liabilities aging and Control account is not matching for the same dates, all my parameters or selection criteria are same
Same report if i am taking for the current date it giving correctly,
If i am trying for a previous day the problem is happening
How can i solve this issue

Hi,
Please check if the transactions are done for different Control Accounts and both the account balances are included in the Aging Report.
Also, check that ALL the customers/vendor groups are taken.
Make sure that you are running the backdated aging with the checkbox as mentioned in the Note 800294.
If still facing problems may be you can provide with more details as to what the control account balances and what is the Aging, difference.
PS: Check if there is any manual journal entry is created in the control account?
Kind Regards,
Jitin
SAP Business One Forum Team

AR aging report does not print alphabetically by customer name in 8.8

AR aging report does not print alphabetically by customer name in version 8.8.
It is possible to create a custom layout for the receivables aging summary report (to print alphabetically by BP name) to overcome this problem. However, itu2019s not possible for the u201Cdetailed receivables aging reportu201D or u201Ccustomer statement reportu201D.
Why has SAP changed this functionality? In version 2007 SAP takes the order of the rows set on the screen unless other order is specified in the layout.
How can we make the u201Cdetailed receivables aging reportu201D and u201Ccustomer statement reportu201D print alphabetically by customer name?
Steps to reproduce:
Business partners > Business partner reports > Aging > customer receivables aging
Doubleclick on customer name to sort it in alphabetical order.
Click on preview and select u201Creceivables aging summary reportu201D.
The system layouts do not print by customer name in alphabetical order.
Click on preview and select u201Cdetailed receivables aging reportu201D. The system layouts do not print by customer name in alphabetical order.
Also, customer statement report does not print by customer name in alphabetical order.
In SAP 2007 versions, when a marketing document or aging report is printed, SAP takes the order of the rows set on the screen unless other order is specified in the layout.
In SAP 8.8 although it works the same way for marketing documents, it doesnu2019t work like this for Aging reports.
I was able to change the order for the u201CReceivables Aging Summary Reportu201D only. We cannot overwrite a System report, I had to create a new layout called: u201CBusiness Partner Aging (Summary) (Alphabetically Sorted)u201D.
I couldnu2019t set up the order based on BP Name for the other 2 options: Detailed Receivables Aging Report and Customer Statement Report (One page per Customer).
Iu2019ve checked print settings and properties, and I donu2019t see any way of changing the default order for these reports.

Reported it to SAP support + they plan to fix it in a future patch.

All Inventories Value Report&Inventory Ageing Report& Current And as on Date Stock not matching

Hello All,
I am new to inventory. I need some help.
After opening the periods of purchasing and inventory for the month of April'15. The below reports should match in costing.
But they are not matching. Kindly help on this as its PROD.
Inventory Ageing Report
Current And as on Date Stock Statement With Value Report
All Inventories Value Report - Average Costing
Thanks
RR

MBEWH is the valuation history, this is only updated with the first movement after a period closure. And the period is a month.
There is no table in SAP that holds the stock information on daily basis.
You have to develope this yourself. Easiest method by copying a table like MBEW and MARD daily to a Z-Table.
A stock situation at a certain date can be calculated with MB5B.
Edited by: Jürgen L. on Aug 5, 2008 4:06 PM

AR AGING REPORT. Why 'BalDueDeb' minus 'BalDueCred' not same as Balance?

Dear All,
I am trying to build SQL which mimics the AR Aging Report in SAP B1 8.8. Reason is to add additional fields needed by Management. I get the SAME TOTAL as Ageing, but when I run my query, I can't get the same no. of rows as Aging.
Aging has 700 rows (NOT display reconciled transactions), and my aim is to get the same no. of rows.
Case I: When I use: WHERE (T0.BalDueDeb - T0.BalDueCred) != 0
I get 816 rows. All zero balances are eliminated, but it seems that some transactions which have been reconciled appear in my report as outstanding debits and also credits. This is why it has more rows than Aging, although total is correct.
Case II: When I use: WHERE Balance !=0
I get 5026 rows. Many rows show zero balances. I don't understand why they are not eliminated. I thought the 2 commands were equivalent.
But the good news is that when I export to Excel and delete all those zero rows, I get exactly 700 rows, same as Aging!
Same total, same no. of rows!
If anybody could help me complete my query, I can continue. How can I eliminate these rows having zero balances? Where have I gone wrong?
Thanks a lot.
Leon Lai
=========================================================================================
SELECT distinct
T1.CardCode,
T1.CardName,
T0.RefDate,
CASE
           WHEN T0.TransType=13 THEN 'IN'
           WHEN T0.TransType=14 THEN 'CN'
           WHEN T0.TransType=30 THEN 'JE'
           WHEN T0.TransType=24 THEN 'RC'
           WHEN T0.TransType=46 THEN 'PS'
           ELSE 'Error ! ! ! !'
END AS 'Document Type',
T0.Ref1 'Document Number',
CASE
           WHEN T0.TransType=13 THEN 'IN' + T0.Ref1
           WHEN T0.TransType=14 THEN 'CN' + T0.Ref1
           WHEN T0.TransType=30 THEN 'JE' + T0.Ref1
           WHEN T0.TransType=24 THEN 'RC' + T0.Ref1
           WHEN T0.TransType=46 THEN 'PS' + T0.Ref1
           ELSE 'Error ! ! ! !'
END AS 'Concat',
T0.Account,
T0.Line_ID AS 'Row',
T0.BalDueDeb,
T0.BalDueCred,
T0.TransId AS 'Id JDT1',
(T0.BalDueDeb- T0.BalDueCred) AS 'Balance'
FROM JDT1 T0 inner join ocrd t1 on t0.Shortname = t1.CardCode
WHERE T1.CardType = 'C'
PROBLEM IS HERE--??????????????--
--and (T0.BalDueDeb - T0.BalDueCred) != 0
and Balance != 0
-- The query gives different results depending on which of the above lines is run. Why?
PROBLEM IS HERE--??????????????--
ORDER BY T1.CardCode, T0.RefDate, T0.Ref1

Dear Gordon,
Thanks for your reply, and sorry for the incomplete reply which went beyond my control.
Here are my results using WHERE (T0.BalDueDeb - T0.BalDueCred) !=0
I have compared Aging Report with SQL Query.
Doc Type Aging Rows         Aging Total     SQL Rows    SQL Total*
CN            57        -214,315.34     57        -214,315.34
IN           452       4,741,436.41     452       4,741,436.41
JE           134         202,209.56     267         201,584.56
PS            12         107,652.40     18         121,352.40
RC             4        -107,168.04     10        -120,243.04
           659       4,729,815.00     804        4,729,815.00
The results are messy, time consuming to generate and investigate. Too much for newbee!
The main differences lie in JE; about x2 rows in SQL Query.
This may be due to rows that have reconciled in Aging, but appear in SQL Query.
I have also prepared a list of Doc. Nos where there are differences, but too lengthy.
TO Help you understand what's happening the foll. remarks may help:
(1) The T0.Ref1 'Document Number' is empty for all JE. However, for other Doc types, these exist and agree with Aging.
(2) Although 'Document Number' is empty for JE, there is a column Ref1 which does give a reference which agrees with Aging
(3) A specific document always has 1 row in Aging, but may have several rows in my query
(4) I do not know why using: WHERE Balance !=0 works, but it does give a near perfect result. Why not use this as starting point? After deleting all the zero rows which it cannot delete, I GET EXACTLY the same result as SAP B1 8.8 Report 'Aged Analysis of Debtors'. Same no. of rows, Same total. How to delete these zeros in SQL?
(5) In SAP B1 forum, it seems many persons still cannot arrive at the official Aging. I maybe near the correct solution, but no idea why it works.
(6) I am continuing the struggle - maybe I need to put a sub query to eliminate the zeros first?
Thanks
Leon Lai

AR Aging Report does not change with Posting, Due, and Document selections

It appears to me that when you run the AR Aging report with the same date ranges in each of the date selection fields, Posting, Due and Doument, you do not get a different display of aging buckets. Does this report always display data based on Due Date?

Hi Bill,
When you run the AR Aging report change "Age by" option and check aging buckets are changing or not it has to change.
Thanks,
Sachin

Missing Function - Aging Report not match in System Currency in SBO 8.8

Dear all,
Version: (Please provide the current version)
SBO 8.8 Patch: 10
Description of requirements: (Please provide a detailed description)
In mentioned patch level, the result/outstanding balance of Aging Report in System Currency was difference when selected 'Display Reconcilied Transactions' or not. The outstanding balance should be be same on both selection.
Valid as of: (Date that this legal requirement is applicable)
N/A
Business needs: (Please describe the impact on your business, if the functionality is not realized)
If the Aging Report cannot disppay the outstanding documetns for reconcile with customer, they cannot check with customers.
Examples: (Please describe a typical example, how the functionality should work.)
Generate the Aging report in System Currency
selected 'Display Reconcilied Transactions' including all transactions and balance is same as Trail Balance
un-selected 'Display Receoncilied Transactions' does not inclding the transactions that Local Currency is zero amount, but System Currency is not zero. The outstanding balance is different to the result of the above selection and Trail Balance as well.
Current Workaround: (Please describe the workarounds you are using at the moment)
Print the Aging Report with selected ' Display Reconcilied Transactions' to show ALL transactions to reconcile the transactions.
Proposed solution: (Please suggest how the new functionality should work)
selected 'Display Reconciled Transactions' or not, the outstanding balance should be the same.
Best regards,
Michael

Bapi's do not set sy-subrc. The only way to check if it was succesfull is to loop into the return table for error messages:
You have to use BAPI_TRANSACTION_COMMIT after calling BAPI_PO_CREATE1:
    READ TABLE errmsg TRANSPORTING NO FIELDS
                        WITH KEY type = c_e.
    IF NOT sy-subrc IS INITIAL.
      CALL FUNCTION 'BAPI_TRANSACTION_COMMIT'
        EXPORTING
          wait = c_x.
ENDIF.

Liabilities Ageing report not acknowledging old journal entries

Hello,
I have just upgraded a system from 2007A SP00 PL48 to 8.8 SP00 PL17. When I ran the Vendor Liabilities report in 8.8 I noticed that one of the business partners has a journal entry and an open invoice. The journal entry has no value when displayed in the report however when i open the journal up, it is showing a debit for the exact same amount as the invoice, but was created as a result of a foreign exchange gain and has not been reconciled against the invoice. The ageing report is showing that the invoice is still outstanding and needs to be paid. However when I run exactly the same report in version 2007, the two amounts are seen to conteract each other and therefore no oustanding amount is shown in the ageing report for this customer. When I reproduce the scenario in 8.8 with a new invoice and new journal entry, the two transactions are shown to counteract and no outstanding balance is displayed.
Does anyone know if there is a problem with old journal entries being recognised in the ageing report in version 8.8 or specifically journals created as a result of foreign exchange rate losses/gains?
Many thanks,
Kate

Hi Kate,
We recently upgraded to 8.8 and in reviewing the aging reports realized some manually reconciled entries had to be redone.
In particular, it seemed to be for entries where foreign currencies were involved. There is a new field in the Internal Rec window in the top left corner - select it and the entries with only SC value will then appear (i.e. you will see all unreconciled entries) along with other entries.
HTH,
Heather

Not able to pick Opening Balance in Ageing Report

Hi
I have made an query for customer ageing report based on our requirement, but am not able to fetch the OB (Opening Balance) in that. If i generate Customer ageing report from B1, its showing the OB in the first line, then it showing the open invoices on the corresponding ageing days.
Can anyone help me to fetch the opening balance in ageing report. Below is the query i have given for ageing.
SELECT     NNM1.Remark AS Branch, OINV.DocNum, OINV.NumAtCard AS VendorRef, OINV.DocType AS Type, OINV.DocStatus AS Status, OINV.DocDate,
                      OINV.DocDueDate, OINV.CardCode, OINV.CardName, OINV.DocTotal, OINV.PaidToDate AS [Paid/Credited],
                      OINV.DocTotal - OINV.PaidToDate AS [Balance Due], (CASE WHEN DateDiff(dd, OINV.DocDate, getdate()) BETWEEN - 120 AND
                      0 THEN (OINV.DocTotal - OINV.PaidToDate) END) AS 'Less then Due Date', (CASE WHEN DateDiff(dd, OINV.DocDate, getdate()) BETWEEN 0 AND
                      30 THEN (OINV.DocTotal - OINV.PaidToDate) END) AS '0 - 30', (CASE WHEN DateDiff(dd, OINV.DocDate, getdate()) BETWEEN 31 AND
                      45 THEN (OINV.DocTotal - OINV.PaidToDate) END) AS '30 - 45', (CASE WHEN DateDiff(dd, OINV.DocDate, getdate()) BETWEEN 46 AND
                      60 THEN (OINV.DocTotal - OINV.PaidToDate) END) AS '45 - 60', (CASE WHEN DateDiff(dd, OINV.DocDate, getdate()) BETWEEN 61 AND
                      90 THEN (OINV.DocTotal - OINV.PaidToDate) END) AS '60-90', (CASE WHEN DateDiff(dd, OINV.DocDate, getdate()) BETWEEN 91 AND
                      120 THEN (OINV.DocTotal - OINV.PaidToDate) END) AS '90-120', (CASE WHEN DateDiff(dd, OINV.DocDate, getdate())
                      > 120 THEN (OINV.DocTotal - OINV.PaidToDate) END) AS '120 +', OSLP.SlpName, OUBR.Name
FROM         OINV AS OINV INNER JOIN
                      NNM1 AS NNM1 ON OINV.Series = NNM1.Series INNER JOIN
                      OSLP ON OINV.SlpCode = OSLP.SlpCode INNER JOIN
                      OHEM ON OSLP.SlpCode = OHEM.salesPrson INNER JOIN
                      OUBR ON OHEM.branch = OUBR.Code
WHERE     (OINV.DocStatus = 'O') AND (OUBR.Code IN (@Branch)) AND (OSLP.SlpCode IN (@SalesEmployee))
ORDER BY OINV.CardName, OSLP.SlpName
How to add the OB in the above query.

Check note 1023083 and for information about the expected release date of the patch please view note 578944.this problem is related to the new SAP GUI 7 patch-level 0. There is something wrong with the GUI function to get information from the local registry (CL_GUI_FRONTEND_SERVICES=>REGISTRY_GET_VALUE).
We had the same issue sometime back and we applied the patch. I have the patch but it will be a huge file to send over internet. See the above notes and you should be able to apply the required patch.
Also check Note
Note 696069 below:
Summary
Symptom
No Data is displayed when View is changed from ALV to Excel Inplace on
ALV Grid. This Happens with Office XP/2003/2007.
Other terms
Excel inplace, Excel, ALV, Office 2003, Office XP, office 2007
Reason and Prerequisites
With newer release of MS Office (XP/2003/2007) Microsoft added new security settings/options for Visual Basic project and Macros. Excel Inplace uses Visual Basic Project and macro functionality of MS Office. If the setting for Macro security is High (which automatically disables macro or if access to Visual Basic Project is suppressed then Excel Inplace doesn't show any Data in Excel.
Solution
Required settings in MS office XP and MS Office 2003:
To use the Excel Inplace functionality make sure the security settings for Macro is set to Medium and the option "Trust access to Visual Basic Project" must be checked on Tools->Macro->Security->Trusted Sources tab.
Required settings in Office 2007:
Please see the video file in attachments of this note.
This is required with MS Office XP, MS Office 2003, MS Office 2007.
Header Data
Release Status: Released for Customer
Released on: 22.12.2006 14:47:01
Priority: Recommendations/additional info
Category: Consulting
Primary Component: BC-FES-OFFI SAP Desktop Office Integration
Secondary Components: BC-FES-XXL XXL List Viewer/Lotus Connections
Reward points if this help
Sanghamitra
Message was edited by:
        Sanghamitra11

Interest not on Aging reports

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for