Inventory Extraction Issue

Hi Gurus,
I have couple of questions here regarding Inventory extraction, and I will ask one by one:
1. I have a requirement to develop a report called " Stock Ledger Report " where the KPI's would be Quantity, Cost & Retail Price. The 2 KPI's Quantity & Costs are straightforward and the data for these come from MSEG-MENGE & MSEG-MENGE respectively. Retail Price is a bit complex since it is dependent on time and my client being a retail one their prices are subjected to change according to time. This is being calculated from different tables in the R/3 side so it's pretty clear that I have to add a custom field to my extractor.
Now my Question is, to which data source should I add the custom field, will it be 2lis_03_bx or 2lis_03_bf?
2. I started the extraction sometime back for 2lis_03_bx since that has to be extracted first, but I am getting a runtime error that says:
Short Text
    Too many parameters specified with PERFORM.
What happened?
    In a subroutine call, there were more parameters than in the
    routine definition.
    Error in ABAP application program.
    The current ABAP program "SAPLMCB1" had to be terminated because one of the
    statements could not be executed.
    This is probably due to an error in the ABAP program.
Error analysis
    An exception occurred. This exception is dealt with in more detail below
    . The exception, which is assigned to the class
     'CX_SY_DYN_CALL_PARAM_NOT_FOUND', was neither
    caught nor passed along using a RAISING clause, in the procedure "UPDATE_CALL"
     "(FORM)"
    Since the caller of the procedure could not have expected this exception
     to occur, the running program was terminated.
    The reason for the exception is:
    A PERFORM was used to call the routine "F0001_UPDATE" of the program
     "RMCSA278".
    This routine contains 4 formal parameters, but the current call
    contains 5 actual parameters.
    parameters.
The first thing I did was to check for the OSS notes 315880 and 353042 that have to be installed in the R/3 system to perform the data loading. I got this from the SAP White paper, How to handle Inventory scenarios in BW.
I didn't find these notes in my R/3 system here, so I searched for these nodes in market place. The first note didn't make much sense to me where as the 2nd note was about how to activate the transaction key (PROCESSKEY).
According to what was mentioned in market place, in order to work with the Inventory extractors I have to activate the determination of the PROCESS KEY. So how do I know which PROCESS KEY corresponds to my requirement ? I could see all the process keys in the Transaction key maintainence for BW in SBIW.
My Question is if these 2 OSS notes are installed. will the issues be resolved ??
Thanks,
Guru.

Hi
check this SAp note for your dump
Note 546844 - PERFORM command: Error message: 'Too many parameters'
cheers,
Swapna.G

Similar Messages

Inventory Extraction - Issues till not Resolved!!

Hi Gurus,
I have couple of questions here regarding Inventory extraction, and I will ask one by one:
1. I have a requirement to develop a report called " Stock Ledger Report " where the KPI's would be Quantity, Cost & Retail Price. The 2 KPI's Quantity & Costs are straightforward and the data for these come from MSEG-MENGE & MSEG-DMBTR respectively. Retail Price is a bit complex since it is dependent on time and my client being a retail one their prices are subjected to change according to time. This is being calculated from different tables in the R/3 side so it's pretty clear that I have to add a custom field to my extractor.
Now my Question is, to which data source should I add the custom field, will it be 2lis_03_bx or 2lis_03_bf?
2. I started the extraction sometime back for 2lis_03_bx since that has to be extracted first, but I am getting a runtime error that says:
Short Text
Too many parameters specified with PERFORM.
What happened?
In a subroutine call, there were more parameters than in the
routine definition.
Error in ABAP application program.
The current ABAP program "SAPLMCB1" had to be terminated because one of the
statements could not be executed.
This is probably due to an error in the ABAP program.
Error analysis
An exception occurred. This exception is dealt with in more detail below
. The exception, which is assigned to the class
'CX_SY_DYN_CALL_PARAM_NOT_FOUND', was neither
caught nor passed along using a RAISING clause, in the procedure "UPDATE_CALL"
"(FORM)"
Since the caller of the procedure could not have expected this exception
to occur, the running program was terminated.
The reason for the exception is:
A PERFORM was used to call the routine "F0001_UPDATE" of the program
"RMCSA278".
This routine contains 4 formal parameters, but the current call
contains 5 actual parameters.
parameters.
The first thing I did was to check for the OSS notes 315880 and 353042 that have to be installed in the R/3 system to perform the data loading. I got this from the SAP White paper, How to handle Inventory scenarios in BW.
I didn't find these notes in my R/3 system here, so I searched for these nodes in market place. The first note didn't make much sense to me where as the 2nd note was about how to activate the transaction key (PROCESSKEY).
According to what was mentioned in market place, in order to work with the Inventory extractors I have to activate the determination of the PROCESS KEY. So how do I know which PROCESS KEY corresponds to my requirement ? I could see all the process keys in the Transaction key maintainence for BW in SBIW.
My Question is if these 2 OSS notes are installed. will the issues be resolved ??...Also is it possible to proceed and resolve the above issues without istalling the 2 OSS Notes.
Thanks,
Guru.

Hey Brian,
Sorry I mistook your reply, am stuck with too much of work buddy, working on Inventory scenarios as well as POS DM too....your answers sounds cool. I will definitely try that once am done with the issue of running the setup tables and actually I think you suggestion would definitely work in my scenario since my client s a retail client and their prices change with time.
Can you also tell answer me with regard to my 2nd question.
Thank you so much
Guru.

Lightroom 4 upgrade extracting issues

Hello,
Recently purchased Lightroom 4 upgrade (download version). Currently using Lightroom 3.6 64bit.
Downloaded successfully, but when tried to extract got this message:
A. Checked to make sure, but I am logged in as Administrator
B. Checked the write permissions for the destination folder (Desktop) and write permission is allowed.
C. I have >30GB available on my SSD HD. I can't imagine it needs more space.
Thoughts? What should i try next.
Thanks for your time.

Thanks for the quick response.
Looked at the Temp folder and all folders appear to have write permissions enabled.
Also only using MSE which I turned off and double checked to make sure Adaware wasn't running in the backround. No help. Still the same extracting issue.
I am not sure about the SSD. I think it is rooted properly? Picture attached.

How do load system form matrix -Inventory-Goods Issue through SDK UI &DI

While I am accessing system form matrix -Inventory Goods Issue/ Goods Receipt, the matrix object is not accessible.
Error is coming stating "Item 13 is invalid, where 13 is item uid for matrix.
So,How do load system form matrix -Inventory-Goods Issue(FORM 720/-720) through SDK UI &DIAPI.
Form Type: -720
How to get reference of System form matrix object -Inventory-GoodsIssue.
Some thing similar to CopyFrom functionality for -Inventory-Goods Issue.
Currently my client requirement is as follows.
I created a UDF ((U_ILC) Incoming Log Challan) for marketing documents. And, this field is added in the header level of Goods Reciept, Goods Issue documents.
1. Through Inventory->Goods Receipt (ILCNo.10), items are received. Assume, M00001, M00002 are the items received with qty, price, whse, account values.
2. Through Inventory->Goods Issue, item should be issued. In this Goods Issue Form, after entering U_ILC value as 10, pressing Tab, the GoodsIssue matrix should be loaded with the values of GoodsReceipt(IGN1 for U_ILC:10) document i.e. M00001,M00002 along with the same values as in GoodsReceipt of ILC:10.
The code is as follows:
If (( ( pVal.FormType = "-720" or pVal.FormType = 720) And pVal.EventType <> SAPbouiCOM.BoEventTypes.et_FORM_UNLOAD) And (pVal.Before_Action = False)) Then
 '// get the event sending form
 oForm = SBO_Application.Forms.GetFormByTypeAndCount(pVal.FormType, pVal.FormTypeCount)
 If pVal.ItemUID = "U_ILCNo" And pVal.EventType = SAPbouiCOM.BoEventTypes.et_LOST_FOCUS And pVal.Before_Action = False Then
 SBO_Application.MessageBox("ILC No. Lost Focus")
 oMatrix = oForm.Items.Item("13").Specific
 oColumn = oForm.Columns.Item("1")
 oEditItmCode = oColumn.Cells.Item(1).Specific
 oEditItmCode.Value = "07215090x606"
 oItem = oForm.Items.Item("U_ILCNo")
 oEdit = oItem.Specific
 SBO_Application.MessageBox(oEdit.String)
 End If
 End If
3. The code
oMatrix = oForm.Items.Item("13").Specific
is raising error. I have used Event Logger and breakpoints to see where the code is halting.
Help me, how to access the matrix of Goods Receipt/ Goods Issue and load based on the existing data.
Thanks in advance

HI
If your code is in the SBO_Application_ItemEvent then try using this line
oForm = SBO_Application.Forms.Item(strFormUID)
instead of
oForm = SBO_Application.Forms.GetFormByTypeAndCount(pVal.FormType, pVal.FormTypeCount)

Extract ' Issued to ' from x509 certificate - Is it possible

HI All,
Can anyone tell me how can I extract 'Issued to' from X509 Certificate.
I know the Issued by i.e. getIssuerDN().getName(). Please let me is it possibel to extract Issued to Information...
Best Regards
San

You can use getSubjectDN() .getName() or getSubjectX500Principal().getName()
If you need more information, please drop me an email [email protected]

Data Extraction issue from the data source 2LIS_08TRTLP

Hi All,
We are facing one issue in time of extraction from data source 2LIS_08TRTLP(Shipment Delivery Item Data per Stage) in BW. For some out bound delivery no. Gross weight(BRGEW) is coming zero though there is value showing in the source system(ECC) in VL03 and in LIPS table. BRGEW (Gross weight) which is directly mapped in BW infosource. There is no restriction in the extraction and 0 is coming for this field in the first layer extraction.Even in the PSA all values are zero.
We have checked those delivery , delivery is being split into batch . But not the all split delivery is
giving this problem.
With Thanks
Shatadru

Yes I have done the same means I have filled setup table for those shipment no related to that delivery no and checked in the RSA 3 and required value is coming in RSA3 a. That means there is no problem in the Extractor .But I can not pull the data now in BW as it is in Production and every day delta comes .But the in the first layer ODS there is no value for that entry which was previously loaded(Though there is no routine and any restriction).
But I have one observation in the data source that particular field is in INVERSION marked in the Source. But that particular delivery for which it is giving is not canceled or returned or rejected. PGI created for that delivery and delivery status is completed for that.

Inventory item issue report

Hi All,
Could someone suggest me is there a report which shows the issues against stocks in the inventory which will help us plan Min/Max.Other thing can anyone tell me how to upload budgets in inv and is there any option of putting in both quantity and value.
Thanks in advance,
Vijay

How do you write off them? If it is by goods issue, just create a query report. However, it will not have any automatic identification for which goods issues are for write-off.
Thanks,
Gordon

Inventory goods issue report

once we write of inventory. HOw can i pull a report for total inventory write off between months. Which report i can use to pull the total inventory write off.

How do you write off them? If it is by goods issue, just create a query report. However, it will not have any automatic identification for which goods issues are for write-off.
Thanks,
Gordon

Adobe Acrobat X Pro Extracting Issue

When the download manager was trying to extract the Adobe Acrobat X Pro files to my computer folder, the following message suddenly popped out:
A problem occured while extracting some files. Check available space on your computer and the write priveleges on the destination folder.
I restarted my computer just in case and tried to download the software again yet when it reached on the extracting part, the message again popped out. I have also checked my available space from my C drive and I still have enough, 1.27 TB to be exact.
I am the only user and the admin of this computer where I'm trying to download the software so it would be unlikely that I am restricted to the destination folder. Also, I have downloaded other softwares to the same destination folder and it went successful. It is just with the Adobe Acrobat X Pro dowload where I'm having this issue.
I would greatly appreciate for your prompt response with this matter. Thank you.

is your harddrive 1tb or larger? if so, you'll need to partition that drive to use acrobat x on it.
otherwise:
uninstall acrobat X
run the cleaner, http://labs.adobe.com/downloads/acrobatcleaner.html
restart your computer
if you're using windows, right click the installation file and click "run as administrator"

Inventory Cube Issue

Hi Experts,
We have created a copy of 0IC_C03 with more no of fields added to the copy cube CIC_C03. We had lot of data mismatch in the earlier stage & now after a long time this copy cube is working fine in production. We have not yet compressed the deltas in the cube.
Now, later there was a field to be added in the inventory cube which takes data from an ODS. For this we created one more copy cube as we didnot want to disturb the inventory cube in production, hence we created one Zcube which is the copy of CIC_C03 with an added field. In the update rules we have a routine which fills with data from the ODS. The CIC_C03 acts as datasource for this Zcube.
My question is:
1) I dont feel that after a month or so, we require the data in CIC_c03 as the same data comes in ZCube. So will deletion of data from CIC_C03 affect my data?
2) The intial data in CIC_C03 are compressed whereas the deltas are not yet compressed. Should the full upload to Zcube take after compression only?
3) Suppose we delete the data from CIC_C03 after 2 months after a full upload is taken till that point. After deletion, the deltas will be coming in CIC_C03, canl these everyday delta be transfeered to Zcube?
Waiting for reply.
Regards,
Vaishnavi.

Hi,
The note(637927) is saying that the KFs which represents the values of Stock-in-transit (issue, receipt, current) are deleted in the cube . But still the cube is containint the KF which represents the quntity of Stock-in-transit (issue, receipt, current) .
So the deleted KF are :
0VALTRANSST - Stock-in-transit value
0RECCCNSVAL - Stock-in-transit issue value
0RECTRFSTVA - Stock-in-transit receipt value
Available KF are:
0TRANSSTOCK - Stock in transit Qty
0RECTRANSST - Receipt quantity: stock in transit
0ISSTRANSST - Issue quantity: stock in transit
So to find out the value of Stock-in-transit , you will use the Stock in transit. The scenario has to be used in this calculation is same as explained in note:589024.
With rgds,
Anil Kumar Sharma .P

PDF Page Extraction issue

Hi all,
i have single pdf file with many pages, on that i cannot able to extract some pdf pages on the file, we receiving error
"There was as problem reading this document (15)"
Please help me how to find the error without using acrobat. If any error code is present in the pdf file data to get.
Please help me to solve the issue.
Regards,
JayaKrishnan

Thanks for your reply on helping this issue
Please tell the option in acrobat to validate the document on this exact error.
And also help me to find the error without opening the pdf file through acrobat.
Thanks Regards,
JayaKrishnan

ISU 0uc_sales_stats_01 Delta extraction Issue

Hi All,
we have a strange issue.
We recently went through migration/conversion during which we did a reinit of 0uc_sales_stat_01.
I have re inited it on 10th then on every day it adds up the delta records starting from 10th till that date.
on 11th it brings 10 & 11th, on 12 it brings up 10th 11th and 12th etc,.,.
When i did analysis from my end i can see table DBESTA_BWTRIG which is used for initial selection of posting date & recon keys in standard extract.
Once mass billing, Mass invoicing happens i get entries in this table.
But these entries do not go away even after the data is extracted into bw.
I can see entries in this table against 0uc_sales_stats_02. i deleted the active version of 02 DS and checked but still the entries remain same.
What is the exact behaviour of this table DBESTA_BWTRIG? how is it updated and deleted or modified?
How do i identify what is the exact reason for this delta issue?
Is there any setting where i am missing in ISU?
Thanks & Regards,
Jana

Hey Steve,
have a look on Des Gallaghers Post in 0UC_SALES_STATS_01 data missing
He describes that one has to load at first in Full-Mode. You will also find a hint on table DBWESTA_BWPROT in IS-U. There will be the records with open reconciliation key which aren't be extracted because of that.

0HR_PT_1 Extraction issue No entry in HR table T569R for 0106

hi experts,
we are implementing Time and Labour cube, and trying to extracting from ECC to BW cube (0PT_C01).
when i extract data from 0HR_PT_1 data source the PSA Request is in yellow for a long time. when i check the issue in ECC. Its giving the below issues.
No entry in HR table T569R for 0106
No entry in HR table T569R for 0105
No personal work schedule for personnel number 00013090
No personal work schedule for personnel number 00013145
No personal work schedule for personnel number 00500009
No personal work schedule for personnel number 00500026
How to rectify the above issues and the load make successful?
Regards
venuscm

Hi,
Do the below things, as per the note 696836.
By using the view V_T569R, maintain the retroactive categories
1. 05 'Earliest time data carry-over'
2. 06 'Latest time data carry-over'
which constitute the time frame, in which the system will perform an extraction. Outside this time frame, the system will neither select any data nor calculate any delta. SAP recommends that you choose a period that includes approximately the current year. You have to maintain and update this time window periodically.
Regards,
Anil Kumar Sharma. P

Inventory 0IC_C03, issue with historical data (data before Stock initializa

Hi Experts,
Inventory Management implementation we followed as bellow.
Initailization data and delta records data is showing correctly with ECC MB5B data, but historical data (2007 and 2008 till date before initialization) data is not showing correctly (stock on ECC side) but showing only difference Qunatity from Stock initialization data to date of Query.
we have done all the initial setting at BF11, Process keys and filed setup table for BX abd BF datasources, we are not using UM datasource.
1 we loaded BX data and compressed request (without tick mark at "No Marker Update)
2. initialization BF data and compressed request (with tick mark at "No Marker Update)
3 for deltas we are comperessing request on daily (without tick mark at "No Marker Update).
is this correct process
in as you mentioned for BX no need to compress ( should not compress BX request ? )
and do we need to compress delta requets ?
we have issue for historial data validation,
here is the example:
we have initilaized on may 5th 2009.
we have loaded BX data from 2007 (historical data)
for data when we see the data on january 1st 2007, on BI side it is showing value in negative sign.
on ECC it is showing different value.
for example ECC Stock on january 1st 2007 : 1500 KG
stock on Initialization may 5th 2009 : 2200 KG
on BI side it is showing as: - 700 KG
2200 - (-700) = 1500 ,
but on BI side it is not showing as 1500 KG.
(it is showing values in negative with refence to initialization stock)
can you please tell, is this the process is correct, or we did worng in data loading.
in validity table (L table) 2 records are there with SID values 0 and -1, is this correct
thanks in advance.
Regards,
Daya Sagar
Edited by: Daya Sagar on May 18, 2009 2:49 PM

Hi Anil,
Thanks for your reply.
1. You have performed the initialization on 15th May 2009.
yes
2. For the data after the stock initialization, I believe that you have either performed a full load from BF data source for the data 16th May 2009 onwards or you have not loaded any data after 15th May 2009.
for BF after stock initialization delta data, this compressed with marker update option unchecked.
If this is the case, then I think you need to
1. Load the data on 15th May (from BF data source) separately.
do you mean BF ( Material movements) 15th May data to be compressed with No Marker Update option unchecked. which we do for BX datasource ?
2. Compress it with the No Marker Update option unchecked.
3. Check the report for data on 1st Jan 2007 after this. If this is correct, then all the history data will also be correct.
After this you can perform a full load till date
here till date means May 15 th not included ?
for the data after stock initialization and then start the delta process. The data after the stock initialization(after 15th May 2009) should also be correct.
can you please clarify these doubts?
Thanks
Edited by: Daya Sagar on May 20, 2009 10:20 AM

COPA extraction issues - Incorrect field name for selection

Dear gurus,
I've issues with my COPA extraction, hope you guys could give me some clue here, point will be rewarded if I could fine the solution.
Requirement:-
To add additional field.
Step:-
As usual 1) Delete
2) Create back with select the new field. (KEB0)
3) Do not have issues when check RSA3 from DEV, but when transport to QAS I hit this issues.
Issues:
At RSA3 , when do check hit the error, "Errors occurred during the extraction"
When check from RSA3 log here I get..
** Did try to find any solution in SCN forum, with no luck. Hope get some help here.
thank you
rgds
Edi.

Yes I did get this feedback ..
Hi Edi,
As per the standard SAP, once you have assigned characteristics and values fields to your operating concern (KEA0), you can't de-assign them. When characteristics or values fields are in assigned status, you can't delete them.
But I hope there won't be much problem of having that characteristic also. If you look at performance wise, then instead of deleting, make "not used" under profitability segment characteristics, remove from the characteristic groups etc. While doing so, please check any derivation rules written based on these, or any assessment cycles defined with these also..
Regards...
Jose
forward to my FICO ..

Inventory Extraction Issue

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for