Invoice settlement

Hi team,
i have query on invoice settlement.
there is one customer to whom we have supplied 100 differant Materials(SKU's) through 10 differat invoices in the month of October.
now customer is paying me amount for 60 SKU's, however remaining 40 SKU's are still lying there at customer premises.
but buisness wants to settle remaining those 40 SKU's which are lying at customer premises.
Business does not want to take back those 40 SKU's to own premises,and hits the COGS & Customer ledger both through Sales tranaction .
i would request to guru kindly advice me how to attain the requirement.

Hi,
Please refer to the following threads:
[Intercompany Billing|Inter Company Billing process;
[Intercompany Invoice|INTERCOMPANY BILLING;
Regards,
Amit

Similar Messages

Cstomer customer invoice settlement against Incoming payment

Dear All
We have a problem during customer invoice settlement against incoming payment that shown for the partial payment as a new document creation. The scenario as shown below,
     Doc No      Amount
180000001   50000.00 ;   - Invoice
140000001   25000.00-   - Incoming Payment / partial payment
balance         25000.00 ; - create a new doc no ( but we need setoff to invoice no)
i.e:
180000001       25000.00
any BAPI to apply over come this problem ?
Thanks
Madhawa

Dear:
              Please refer to the following link, the same question was raised by me
              Invoice reference field in F-28
              Regards

Automatic invoice settlement

Hi.
Recently we have started issuing PO & invoices in foreign currencies. Payments are sent in the respective currencies as well. Whenever we do all of the aforementioned in the local currency, after running F110 automatic postings and invoice clearing takes place therefore we do not have to use Tcode F-44 to clear vendor accounts. Same doesn't apply for the invoices issued in the foreign currencies. Each and every time we have to run F-44 and settle accounts manually.
I am guessing that along the way we have missed certain set up steps that would allow for automatic postings take place.
Help is appreciated.
Thank you.

Hi,
ERS - Automatic invoice settlement is always refer the PO .
so, you can post the Subsequent debit if price increase. because price dertermined from Purchase Order.
But MRKO. the Price determined from Info record.
If the Info record the how can we use subsequent debit option.
also MRKO is the process to intimate to consignment vendor about the cunsumption only. it won't determine any price.
Not possible to use subsequent functionality for MRKO.
SAM
Edited by: Saminathan Gopalan on Jun 23, 2010 3:04 PM

Partial goods receipt & invoice settlement

Hi All,
I want to know the process of partial goods receipt. I want to know how the PO is created for this purpose and GR is done for partail goods receipt. Also how the invoice is settled for only quantity received??

hi buddy
no need to make any special po
make the normal po
then do gr with the partial quantity , at time of migo ie gr u will find quantities change that with ur partial quantity
then do the miro ie invoice verification ,system will take automatically the gr quantity ie partial and show price accordingly
this way u can do the partial gr and settlement
but now if u dont want to do the gr of remaining quantity then just in me22n ie change po in delevery tab in item level give indecator of delevery completed and also lock the item from item overview
this might helpful
reward if useful

MRDC - Exclude PO's from Invoice Settlement

I'm trying to manually exclude designated PO's from the MRDC (Delivery Cost ERS Settlement) report.   Each day the AP team excludes 3 PO's from this run but they just reappear on the next run and spit out an error report for them to work. Normally when they manually exclude a PO from the MRDC run it no longer appears on the next run.
Any ideas on how to permanently exclude these errant PO's from this run?     Thanks for your input!

Yes, selecting the line and hitting SAVE normally exludes the line from the ERS run...this we know.   There has been no activity on these lines for month's, however, even though they try and exclude them on a regular basis they continue to show daily in the error reports.
My question is more "does anyone have a way to update these Purchase Orders directly or update directly so they will not continue to show up in MRDC for ERS?"   If anyone has any further ideas i would greatly appreciate it. Thanks!

"Material Invoice Cycle- field" in the Invoice tab of the Purchase Order?

Hi,
Does somebody has a clue on the field "Material Invoice Cycle- field" in the Invoice tab of the Purchase Order?
What are the functions, dependencies and the scenarion one can use this field.
Regards

Hi
Here in Is-oil we have invoice cyles. Provisional invoice, Final invoice, interested invoice, settlement invoice etc..
So in sales at first provisional invoice has been created than the final invoice based on the Provisional invoice.. and further invoices like interest invoice & settlement invoice ..
So here we are using 4 invoice cycle.. hence you have to define in the Spro-->industry solution -->oil & gas > cross component application>maintain the invoice cycle numbers... 4
And this data has to be used in Condition type
Spro--> industry solution -->oil & gas > cross component application> MM split invoice -->Enter the data in additional invoice .
These is the function of Material invoice cycle field...
Thanks and regards
Raja

Consignment settled through MRKO

Hello Experts,
There are few invoice settlements through MRKO and the issue is material price is wrong as the price in material info. Adding to it, the invoices are already paid. Now business wants to reverse the documents and again process the it with corrected info. price.
Please advice about the appropriate solutions available.
It is not advisable to reverse the payment document, instead there can be a financial JV adjustment and a material price adjustment at MM level to control the price variance.
Please let us know, what is the appropriate process to adjust the material price at MM end.
Regards
Partha

Post a Credit / Invoice memo for the price difference against that vendor through FB65/FB60.
If not, change the price in Info-record and re-valuate the PO through MRNB so that Debit/Credit memo will automatically posted accordingly.
For the above step, you should check the Revaluation option in Vendor master - Purchase data.

Invoicing Plan

Hi Experts,
i got this message when i try to run invoicing settlement through MRIS, and it gave me this message:
Invoicing plan: No message was found for partner 1234567890/company code 1000
Message no. M8447
Diagnosis
You are using an invoicing plan to invoice deliveries and services of business partner 1000 in company code 1234567890. For the information of the vendor, a document is to be created using the message determination function.
System Response
If no message record was found for a partner because of the message control settings, meaning that no output message can be created, no invoice documents are created.
Procedure
In Customizing for Invoice Verification, check that the data for message determination has been maintained in such a way that an output message can be created for the vendors in the invoice document.
Execute function
If you want to settle without creating a document using message determination, you can switch off this message in Customizing.
how do i actually set the information messge for the vendor?
Thanks,
shan
Message was edited by:
weishan yong

To close the message,
IMG: Materials Management -> Logistics Invoice Verification -> Define Attributes of System Messages
if there is no message # 447 (Invoicing plan: No message was found for partner &1/company code &2) exists in the table, entry a new line.
Make sure that Online and BatchI are - .(switch off the message)
Then you can run invoicing settlement .
But I still have problem. The invoices are not created seprately.
It means the invoice plans are sumed up in one date.
So strange, hope to get your feedback.

Detaisl in invoicing vendor consignment

Hi Colleagues,
I'm settling a vendor consignment process and I'm facing a few questions regarding invoice settlement.
I've received consigned stock from a vendor with 101 K movement (2 pieces).
Then I transfered 1 piece to usual stock 411 K movement, and the other piece I've consumed it thru 201 K.
Now, I want to invoice it...
Can I invoice referring to the PO? Can I invoice 1 piece after 411K and then invoice the other piece after 201 k?
Can anybody details the diferent options / processes of invoice consignment stocks?
Please give me relevante tcodes besides MRKO and MB54.
Regards

Hi
There is only one T.code for settling the Consignment liabilities & that is MRKO.
In MRKO, you can reference the Material Document which you want to settle.
First run the transaction using the Vendor , with Dipaly as selection.
Check the Material documents which are to be settled for 411 K movemnt .
Now come back & enter the Material document of 411 K & settle the Liabilities.
In this way you will be settling only for 411 K & 201 will be pending
Thanks & Regards
Kishore

Subsequent debit function for MRKO settlement

Hi,
We have one business requirement for one of our client,
The business requirement is ERS - Automatic invoice settlement is paid for the amount of Rs 150 for the qty of 10. After the automatic invoice settlement via using t.coe MRRL, We can able to Post the subsequent debit for the for qty of 10 and amount increased of 200 by vendor. Incase of price changed by vendor after settlement through the ERS we can post the excess amount using subsequent debit settled accordingly.
The same requirement is needed for Consignment and Pipeline settlment (MRKO) function also,but however we settled the invoice using MRKO after that in MIRO transaction not able to post the corrosponding subsequent debit.
Any other setting is require to post the subsequent debit for consignment and pipe line?
How to settle the excess amount in case of price change of consignment invoice?
- Regards,
Velu

Hi,
ERS - Automatic invoice settlement is always refer the PO .
so, you can post the Subsequent debit if price increase. because price dertermined from Purchase Order.
But MRKO. the Price determined from Info record.
If the Info record the how can we use subsequent debit option.
also MRKO is the process to intimate to consignment vendor about the cunsumption only. it won't determine any price.
Not possible to use subsequent functionality for MRKO.
SAM
Edited by: Saminathan Gopalan on Jun 23, 2010 3:04 PM

Dealer excise invoice workflow?

What is the dealer excise invoice? what is the MRP indicator in dealer ED capture? What tax code need to select in PO? Please can any one tell the full workflow till invoice settle ment? Executes for unrelated answer

Please go through the documentation and attachment given in the note - 1104456

Down payment request for contract with periodic billing

Hi Friends,
Could anyone help me in understanding the configuration settings for down payment / advance payment senario for a CONTRACT which has Order related billing (I have done for Order with milestone billing plan).
The contract has order related *periodic billing plan* where settlement period is suppose quaterly billing and actual invoice is happening on 1st date of the quarter. But i want to create a down payment request say 10 days before the billing date[(actual invoice(F2) date] of every quater as an advance payment/ down payment.
FYI...
For order i am using standard billing rule 1 in milestone billing plan for final invoice but for downpaymnet billing dates (added additional settlement periods then actual invoice settlement period like 3 adv pay ment og 20%, 30% 50% & one actual invoice period for whole amount 100% as D4 doc only) i am manually changing the billing rule as 4 to create a down payment req.
But in contract as its has periodic billing plan no billing rule changing option (no additional settlement period can be added, only settlement period for actual invoice is getting proposed) so i can't have two different rule for a settlement period. no settlement period can be added separately for adv paymnet/down payment.
Kindly respond ASAP.
Rgds
Manish

Hi, Many thanks for your response.
But the down payment functionality for a SO with milestone billing i have already implemented.
The question was for CONTRACT Side (say rental / service contract). The contract has periodic billing (monthly / Q'ly).
Kindly let me know if you/anyone has any idea for config settings for a contract with the senario mentioned in previous thread post.
Thnx & Rgds
MG

VAT Payment to VAT Authority in Azerbaijan on Payment run

Hi SAP Guru,
I have gather a VAT requirement that in Azerbaijan that at the time of payment run to external vendors for invoice settlement, the company is also obliged to pay VAT portion to the authority.
The VAT portion amount should relate to the Payment amount to the external vendors. I was thinking of exploring the possibility of using BTE to create a payment request.
would any of you have any suggestion/inputs/advice on the solution to this issue?
Thanks in advance
taro

Hi...........
To get such kind of report, you have to map tax accounts accordingly. Tax accounts for both purchase and sale would be same so that if you want to know the balance of VAT account you can get easily.......
Regards,

Entry in VTSP table

Hi,
Does anyone knows why a shipment with a stage, would not result in an entry in the VTSP table? We have now 616 entries in the VTTK table, of which 43 did not result in an entry in the VTSP table.
Our shipments will always go to 1 ship-to-party, (belonging to 1 sold-to-party). Which would result in 1 incoterm which is valid for all of the deliveries within a shipment. The program RVADTR01 seems to check in the form: get_data_cmr_14 whether or not there is an entry in the VTSP table... if not, no checkbox (Franco or Non-Franco) is being set on the CMR.
Is it correct that the entries did not end up in the VTSP? Why?
Thanx! Eric

Hi,
This table will be updated when there exists Vendor who is for a automatic invoice settle ment .purpose.In the Vendor there will be a check box for ERS.When you check this box invoices can be settled automatically.
For example if there is a PO for house rent which had to be paid monthly(which are called as invoicing plans) this type of procedure come into pictiure.
Basically the table EKRS ERS Procedure: Goods (Merchandise) Movements to be Invoice will be updated through a payment at the transaction code MRRL.
The text for the ERS will be
Evaluated Receipt Settlement (ERS)
Specifies that evaluated receipt settlement (ERS) or the automatic generation of invoices according to an invoicing plan is to be possible in relation to materials supplied or services performed (respectively) with regard to this vendor or this document item.
Use
If you wish to settle up with regard to PO or scheduling agreement items involving this vendor using Evaluated Receipt Settlement (ERS), this indicator must be set.
This indicator must also be set if you wish to work with purchase orders used in conjunction with invoicing plans when procuring external services.
Regards,

ERS indicator of PO item is not checked for Contract assigned SRM POs.

Hi Team
We have SRM PO which is assigned to contract as source of supply and vendor for the contract document is assigned with ERS functionality (Aut. setlement in vendor master) for Invoice settlement.
Issue faced: When the contract is selected as sources of supply for Shopping cart and ordered as release order in MM (classic deployment) MM PO line ERS flag is not defaulted. Scenario works for normal procurement with vendor assigned Purchase orders.
Did any one faced similar issue in their landscape.
Regards
Prashanth K Saralaya

I think this is one of the vendor data synchronisation issue like OA vendor .
Vendor master team might change some data but in contract it will not be synched automaticaly. we may require action on CONTRACT equivalent to vendor master maintenance.
if the contract has ERS .It might be available in PO too when you refer contract.
debate come here like who takes precedence vendor master or contract ?
However customer may expect this ERS falg has to set in the contract as well as it may replicate the same in po as well.
for testing manually EDIT via ECC contract and flag ERS.
muthu

Invoice settlement

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for