Invoice Verification (MIRO) posting, showing an error on Tax Code

Hello
When i am making MIRO posting it is showing that the specific tax code which i has given is not maintained in the Tax Procedure, but i have checked all the CIN Configurations, Activated the CIN and Tax Procedure is assigned to Country also and rest all is fine,i hav even created the Tax Code but still it is showing that, the TAX CODE is not maintained in Tax Procedure.
Plz help me out,

Hi Minhaj,
Please goto FTXP & check if the tax rates are maintained for the given tax code. If they are maintained then check if accounts are entered by clicking on the acconts tab.
If you are maintaining Jurisrdiction codes, please ensure that you are entering the correct jurisdiction code for the tax code you have entered.
Please ensure that you are using the same Tax code & Jurisdiction code in MIRO as is there in MIGO.
Hope this helps.
Thank you.
Regards,
AVD

Similar Messages

Field Selection for - Invoice Verification (MIRO)

Dear Experts,
Can anybody please explain how make Field selection for INVOICE VERIFICATION (MIRO).
I want BUSINESS AREA field mandatory in MIRO.
Thanks in Advance

Hi,
Business area is linked to other organizational units (plant, division,
distribution chanel, cost center). It can be defined using assigments
(e. cost centers to the business area) or combinations of information
(like plant and division determination).
It is usually derived from the account assignments of the cost items
and inherited from there into the vendor line item.
For MIRO,to automatically fill the business area it must be able to
uniquely identify a business area.
This means that for multiple materials each one must have the same
business area for IV to fill the vendor line item.
This is the way the system is designed.
The business area can be set as 'optional' field and is not 'mandatory'
by design.It can be customised according to the individual needs.
Please check the field status in tr OB41/OB14 and OB23 for the vendor.
Best Regards,
Arminda Jack

Invoice verification (MIRO) filed selection

Hi Experts,
Could please explain, where we can invoice verification MIRO field selection.
I want to change invoice party field selection which in the MIRO header - Details tab from display mode to change mode.
My requirement is to change invoice party in the MIRO screen other than the PO vendor.
Could you explain, where these settings are exist in the configuration?
How we can make invoice party field selection from display mode to change mode?
Could you explain ASAP.
Regards
KRK

Hi,
Go to: IMG->MM->LIV->Incoming Invoice
Enter these details and make Inv. Party as you want
Transaction          MIRO
Screen variant       0001_000_0150
Program              SAPLFDCB
Screen               150
Hope this helps!
Reetesh

User exit during invoice verification (MIRO) and PO creation

Hi,
    I have a following scenario to be support by ABAP development
1. During invoice verification (MIRO) system should allow users to manually make any changes in amount and qty proposed by system.
2. During purchase order creation i need a warning message in case of this po is first creating for that particular article and vendor combination.
   so that user will get alerted in case of wrongly choosen the vendor.Many a times user create wrong po, wrong GR and wrong invoice.
since the business process activities are decentralized, person who is making GR is differ from the peron who had created po and invoice.
Ex: material DCF is supplying by vendor VLC international, where there is one more vendor name with VLC traders. due to this name some time users will prepare wrong po, wrong GR and wrong invoice.
   plz suggest how can i suggest my ABAPER to control this mistakes.

Hi,
you can check out the following exits while PO creation:
EXIT_SAPMM06E_006
EXIT_SAPMM06E_007
EXIT_SAPMM06E_008
EXIT_SAPMM06E_009
EXIT_SAPMM06E_012
EXIT_SAPMM06E_013
EXIT_SAPMM06E_014
EXIT_SAPMM06E_016
EXIT_SAPMM06E_017
EXIT_SAPMM06E_018
Thanks.

Error FF753 Tax code 01 not appear in any G/L account item with FM Active

Hi
We have fund management configured for one of the company code, while creating billing document through VF01/VF02 we are getting the Error FF753 Tax code 01 not appear in any G/L account item.
This error however does not appear when posting directly from FI with the same tax code.
I have tried to change the message control in which case i am getting a dump pointing to PSM-FM.
Please advise.
Regards
Sandeep

Hi:
          If you could please refer to the contents of OSS Note 112609 - How are tax codes transferred to conditions ?
"Symptom
If a billing document is transferred to accounting the system displays error messages. Transferring tax codes from tax conditions into the pricing conditions and discounts does not function as expected.
Other terms
FF805, FF747, FF753, MWSKZ, MWSK1, tax code
Reason and Prerequisites
The tax condition in the SD pricing procedure contains incorrect reference steps, there are several tax conditions in the pricing procedure of which the tax codes overwrite each other or a program error exists.
Solution
In the accounting document for a billing document, the different G/L account line items are provided with a tax code. The tax code of the G/L accounts is transferred from the tax condition(s) of the billing document. How are the tax codes of the tax conditions transferred into the other conditions of a billing document ?
Basically:
The conditions of a billing document are read from top to bottom. As soon as an active tax (inactive = ' ') is read, the system transfers the tax code of this tax into the non-tax conditions as follows:
    1. The reference steps (From-step, To-step) are read (the reference steps are defined in the pricing procedure).
    2. The tax code is transferred into all conditions, for which
    the step number of the condition lies in the pricing procedure between "From-step" and "To-step",
    the condition is not inactive (exactly: the inactive flag is not equal to A (Condition exclusion), M (Inactive due to manual entry), or X (Incorrect)),
    the condition is not statistical (if it is no invoice list condition),
    the condition is no tax condition.
After the transfer of the tax code the system searches for the next active tax. If further taxes are found, their tax code is again transferred according to the above procedure. If the reference steps of different taxes overlap, tax codes that have already been transferred are overwritten. To all non-tax conditions which in the pricing procedure stand after the last tax condition the tax code of the last active tax condition is transferred if they are not statistical.
Special features:
    1. If the "From-step" of a tax condition refers to a subtotal of the pricing procedure, the tax code of the tax is not only transferred into the conditions with step number between From-step and To-step but into all non-tax conditions for which
    the step number of the condition in the pricing procedure is lower than the "To-step" of the tax condition.
    the condition is not statistical (if it is no invoice list condition).
    the condition is not a tax condition.
    2. If the "To-step" of the tax condition is smaller than the "From-step", then the system sets "To-step = From-step".
Notes:
    1. As of Release 4.0 the tax code is no longer transferred in pricing but only when the billing document is released to accounting.
    2. If you use several taxes and tax codes and Customizing is incorrect for the release of billing documents to accounting, among others the system may display error message FF747.
    3. If there are several taxes in the pricing procedure refer to Notes 72173 and 82091 for Releases 3.0D - 3.1G. For Release 3.1H, only note 82091 is relevant.
    4. For conditions which are transferred into accounting (thus not statistical, not inactive conditions) and do not contain a tax code, the system searches for a default tax code which in Accounting Customizing can be set depending on the company code (tax code for non-taxable transactions). This applies to releases up to and including Release 4.5B. For Release 4.6, refer to Note 385127."
Regards

Error in Tax code while creating a PO in T.code ME21n

Hi,
I am trying to create purchase Order, I am getting an error when while entering this
Tax Code : v1
Jurisdict. Code: RS14902
The error is "Tax code v1 in procedure TAXBRJ is Invalid"
How to rectify this error. Or
What can be other way of entering the tax code and jurisdict code

Hi,
Go to the Table T007A, where you find the tax codes.
Input & out put taxes are the tax types.
In FTXP T.code give the tax code and click on the
Input tax codes are used for purchase cycle and out put taxes are for sales cycle. I Hope you have given the sales related tax code. Thats why system is giving the error message.
In T007 Table give the proper input and get the details.
Regards,

While Printing Stock Transfer PO giving error message " Tax code in procedu

Dear SAP MM Cons,
I want see the print preview of stock transfer purchase order but i getting following error.
Tax code in procedure TAXINN is invalid
Where we need not require to give any tax code in the stock transfer PO. Can any body help me to see the printpreview of STO.
Reagrds
Abhishek Tiwari

Kedarji
Thank you.Urgent please.
Regards
venkat
Edited by: garapati on Feb 15, 2008 12:06 PM

Invoice Verification (MIRO) allocation via Delivery note

We are in 5.00 version
In our system the same Delivery note number could be associated not only to different vendor, but even to the same vendor in different years.
In the last case the system allocate ALL the Delivery notes.
I try to use the F4 function to limit the selection, using filter on vendor and document date, but after the again all the delivery note for the selected vendor are allocate.
Could anybody help me on this.
thanks
Claudio

In our organisation we are doing MIRO with reference to Delivery note. As same number of delivery note is being submiited by multiple vendors, after entry of that delivery note in MIRO system shows large list (Closed & Open for MIRO). This becomes difficult to select the required delivery note.
Is it possible to make display of only those delivery notes against which MIRO (Invoice verification has not done).
Also MIRO with reference to GRN number is possible or not ?
HI,
To avoid difficulties post miro with Reference document (PO Reference Tab) - Delivery note click on Radio button a possible entries for delivery note screen will appear. Here you can search specific delivery note by a lot of criteria which will save ur time and effort also you can see MIGO Document. Click and put tick to adopt and post Delivery note / migo and enter required field.

Invoice Verification MIRO

Dear All,
This is about invoice verification block after MIRO posting-
In PO we have set it as 2 way match, once the PO is equal to Invoice verification then the system should not put any payment block. But if it doesnt match the value of PO to IV then the system should put invoice verifcation block (R) in the accounting document.
Here, whatever we post that is whether the PO value is matching or not the invoice verification block (R) is appearing in the accounting document. Does any one gone through similar issue....
I want to know how this can happen?
Checked validations but nothing that sort appears.....is there a way to find out how this happens....
Thanks to all in advance.

Hello
I do not know of any BAPI. But you can set an automatic block up through your payment terms.
Check the following customizing path for this:
Financial Accounting
->Accounts Receivable and Accounts Payable
   ->Business Transactions
     ->Incoming Invoices/Credit Memos
       ->Maintain Terms of Payment
Select the details for the payment term and check for the indicator there to set the default block key.
Hope this helps
Ray

RE.Can We do (MIGO) Batch No based Logistics Invoice Verification(MIRO)

Dear All
While doing invoice verification reference to MIGO Doc. we are not able to see Vendor Batch No field in MIRO Screens.
I.e
Item No. 10 100No's as per DC/Invoice Received stores were Accepted. But in Production QC Accepted 80 No's 20 Rejected in Batch.625268.
Batch.625261 = 20No's
Batch.625268 = 25No's
Batch.625263 = 25No's
Batch.625305 = 40No's
While doing Invoice verification FI do MIRO only for accepted qty. But FI User reduced Qty. in Batch 625263 instead of 625268.
Because in MIRO screens We are not able to find Vendor Batch Field form MIGO.
Please advise how to GET Batch Field in MIRO Screen.
Regards:
P. Ramana Reddy.

Hi Anil,
could you tell me which PO type to be used in such case.
Secondly it is quite confusing to me.
In your reply, you had mentioned that you post the inbound delivey document prior to booking the CVD using MIRO. then how you are able to post it again using VL32N (change Inbound delivery Transaction)
Actually i'm looking for scenario as mentioned below.
1 Import PO is created with all applicable tax condition
2 Inbound Delivery is created (using VL31N), but not Posted.
3 MIRO Invoice is booked for CVD Duties.
For MIRO Invoicing System Should propose the Qty and Value based on the inbound delivery
4 then we will do the Good Receipt either from VL32N( by Posting the Inbound Delivery) or from MIGO against Inbound delivery.
5. Later we will post the Vendor Invoice.
In Step 3, if i have to book the MIRO (CVD Portion) Manually, then i have no issue in my process.
Can you through some light on how i can make the system to propose the CVD Value while creating MIRO for custom duties.
Regards,
S Anand

Same nr range in Invoice Verification (MIRO) and FI document

Dear all can you please help to solve this issue?
We would like to have the same number range for invoice verification and for financial document, what we have to do?
Regards
Marco

Please follow the steps as below
Step 1. Maintain FI document number range. Use transaction OMR4 and go to Number range for document types in FI. Select the company code for which you want to create the new number range interval and click on the change interval button. Insert a new document number range by clicking on the insert interval button on top of the screen.for example, I created number range interval 52 with the document numbers 5200000000 5299999999. Don't forget to set the external number range check box (Ext).
Step 2. Assign FI number range to FI document types. The second step is to assign the number range created in step 1 to the FI document type for invoices. Again use transaction OMR4 and go to Document type. Double-click on the document type, which you are using for LIV invoices. In my example, I used the SAP standard document type RE. In the number range field, assign the new number range interval 52
Step 3. Maintain MM document number ranges. Use transaction OMRJ and click on change interval button. Insert a new document number range by clicking on the insert button at the top of the screen. For MM documents, I created number range interval 52 with the document numbers 5200000000 5299999999. For the internal number range assignment, do not set the external number range check box (Ext).
Step 4. Update MM number range assignment. The last step is to assign the MM number range to your MM transaction via IMG menu path Materials Management>Logistics Invoice Verification>Incoming Invoice>Number Assignment>Maintain Number Assignments for Logistic Documents>Transaction Assign Number ranges. Two transactions are available. LIV contains the following two internal transactions that are used for the MM document number determination:
RD: manual invoice entry (MIRO)
RS: cancel, reverse invoice (MR8M), evaluated receipt settlement (MRRL), EDI invoice receipt, invoicing plan (MRIS), and revaluation (MRNB).
You need to update the number range interval for transaction RD.
hope now that things r clear
reward accordingly

Invoice Verification without posting Part II

Hi,
Invoice Verification has been done without posting of Part II entry for Goods Receipt.There is no part I qty remained in Excise doc (J1IEX).
How to post Part II entry(Duty credit) with ref to GR.Please suggest for the same.
Regards,
Goraksh Dhikale.

hi
the known method is
at time of gr use no excise
step1 go to j1iex and capture the excise with ref of gr doc
step2 then update the part 1 entry manually in j1i5
step 3 then post excise in j1iex with ref of int invoice no given in step 1
regards
kunal

Error 'No tax code found for difference' in Posting Vendor Invoice IDOC

Hi All,
I am getting error message 'No tax code found for difference' while posting Vendor Invoice IDOC into SAP. IDOC type is INVOIC02. There is no difference in PO price, Invoice price and even Standard price. then why this error message? Other Vendor EDI settings are done ( OBCA, OBCD, OBCE etc). Is there any thing specific to be done in the config for this error?
IDOC has PO as reference document.
I looked into several threads in SDN forum but could not find proper solution
Can any ine help me with this issue?
Thanks in advance
Hari

Hi
You might be missing the tax code for uploding through IDOC
so you can use the t.code we02 and give the doc and find the error
go to the WE19 to edit the tax code
and USE the t.code BD87 to select the doc and process it
thanks
Madhu

Invoice verification(MIRO) for consignment

Dear ALL,
I have two questions about invoice verification.
1.Now we create PO for consignment material. For consignment material, we use MRKO to settle the GI and generate the AP. However, when we do IV via MIRO by selecting vendor, some consignment PO GR records also pop up. Can we hide those POs during invoice verification?
2.For some PO which IV is done, we can also display some blank items in MIRO, can we hids those items also?
Thanks,
Gary

Hi, all
Does anybody can answer my questions?
Thanks in advance,
Gary

Wrong Vendor Invoice Posting Due To Wrong Excise Tax Code

Hi:
We have created a Purchase Order as per below:
Qty     10
Price     100
Value     1000
Excsie 10%     0
Cess     0
SECess     0
Value+Excise     1000
VAT 5%     50
ValueExciseVAT     1050
(Please note that the PO was to be created in the following fashion as the Material was excisable)
Qty     10
Price     100
Value     1000
Excsie 10%     100
Cess     2
SECess     1
Value+Excise     1103
VAT 5%     55.15
ValueExciseVAT     1158.15
We did the Goods Receipt and the FI Document is as follows:
24340000     Paper Stock     BSX     1,000.00
13110100     GR/IR-ext proc     WRX     1,000.00-
We did the Vendor Invoice Posting as follows:
100183     SIEGWERK INDIA PVT LTD (SICPA)     KBS     1,050.00-
13110100     GR/IR-ext proc     WRX     1,000.00
24638100     VAT Recoverable     JP5     50.00
The Material was issued to Cost Centre
Later at the time of Excise Invoice posting, we came to know that the Tax Code in the Purchase Order was wrong. Here in our case, we have created separate Tax Code based on Excise Percentage. For example, V1 for VAT 5%, E1 for VAT %+Excise 10.3%.
To post the excise invoice, we changed the Tax Code in the Purchase Order and did the Excise Posting as follows:
24820020     CENVAT Inp SHEcess     1.00
24820000     CENVAT Inp BED     100.00
24820010     CENVAT InpEcess     2.00
13113920     CENVAT clearing     103.00-
My Question:
a. Is this the correct way?
b. What about the following FI Entries which got generated when we do the MIRO with actual Tax Code:
100183     SIEGWERK INDIA PVT LTD (SICPA)     KBS     1,158.15-
13110100     GR/IR-ext proc     WRX     1,000.00
13113920     CENVAT clearing     JI1     100.00
13113920     CENVAT clearing     VS9     2.00
13113920     CENVAT clearing     JI6     1.00
24638100     VAT Recoverable     JP5     55.15
Please guide.
Regards,

Thanks Sanjoo for the reply.
Here my worry is the all the postings have been made in SAP in Production Client.
The User has already done the postings for MIRO & J1IEX without informing to us, and the volume of transactions is huge.
We are in the back-log mode and at this stage, we can't go for any reversal . I am Just exploring the alternatives.
Our MM & FI Users are little bit smart, when ever they do some mistake, they simply say "we will pass a JV" and we are not able to educate them that the JV is not a Solution. Please guide.
Regards,
PK

Invoice Verification (MIRO) posting, showing an error on Tax Code

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for