Invoice verification posting and validation

Hi,
what is the trx to create a validation for invoice verification (the invoice is being posted by MIRO)
Regards

Transaction OB28/ GGB0
Regards,
SDNer

Similar Messages

  • MIRO(Invoice Verification) posting date is lesser than MIGO(Goods Receipt)

    MIRO(Invoice Verification) posting date is lesser than MIGO(Goods Receipt) posting date.
    Explanation:
    Miro sholud be posted after the GRN has posted. It means that the Posting date of Miro should be greater than or equal to the Posting date of Migo. But I am facing the issue that I can able to post the Miro before the Migo date..
    For example:  I have posted the Migo(Goods receipt) document with the posting date u2013 10.8.09 and at the same time I can also able to post the Miro(Invoice Verification) posting date as u2013 5.08.09. This is should not be allowed . Kindly give me the solution. Is there any options in SAP standards to restrict this type of Postings(without using user exit).
    regards
    Varadharaj

    Hi
    you  need to use BADi for this INVOICE_UPDATE
    you can give logic as whil;e MIRO system will compare posting date with MIGO doc , then create a Z error msg in se91 nad assign it in that badi
    take help of ABAPer, check following link
    [LINK |GR date lesser than the PO date, the system should show an error message.;

  • System allows GRs to be reversed after invoices have posted and clear

    Users have noticed that it is possible to post a GR, post and clear and Invoice, then reverse the GRs, which is an audibility problem. Previously (possibly before upgrade to ECC 6) this was not possible.Is there any configuration available to change this behavior, or  is it a standard SAP in ECC 6, or if there are unapplied OSS notes that would fix the issue.
    I checked transaction code OMBZ and the movement type 102, 106, 122, and 162 do not have a check on them.
    Is there another way of preventing the Goods Receipts to be reversed after invoices have been posted and cleared?
    Thanks,

    System allows GRs to be reversed after invoices have posted and clear
    Users have noticed that it is possible to post a GR, post and clear and Invoice, then reverse the GRs, which is an audibility problem. Previously (possibly before upgrade to ECC 6) this was not possible.Is there any configuration available to change this behavior, or is it a standard SAP in ECC 6, or if there are unapplied OSS notes that would fix the issue.
    I checked transaction code OMBZ and the movement type 102, 106, 122, and 162 do not have a check on them.
    I also checked the "GR based IV" in the PO item details, inoive tab and that is not checked.
    Invoice have been posted and cleared and now the GRs are reversing them, how to prevent this from happening. Is there a config. solution???
    Thanks,

  • Service entry Sheet was reversed after the invoice as posted and rebooked

    Hi..
    Service entry sheet was reversed after the invoice as posted and rebooked with final entry marked.  The rebook transaction created a different $ amount than the original SES.  The difference between the 2 amounts is causing a GRIR out of balance on the PO.  MR11 does not indicate a GRIR out of balance.
    why did SES rebook a different value?
    How can we clean up the GRIR out of  balance?
    Please help...
    Mercy

    This is a standard SAP procedure.
    SAP Note 440942 is helpful to sort this out.
    Thanks,
    Mercy

  • Collective invoice verification posting

    Hello
    I want to generate and post invoices for a group of GR's against a vendor.Is there any way other than MRRL?(as this is not the business case). (something similar to billing due list run VF04 in sales)
    Thanks
    Krishna

    Hi,
    I am not sure that I exactkly understand what it is that you are trying to do?
    but in MIRO you can post multiple POs against one invoice as long as they are all for the same vendor.
    Other than this I am not aware of any bulk invoice verification process (the advantage that the billing due list has is that WE are creating the documents and so we can group things together. In invoice verification we are posting documents that teh vendors create and so we have top process them as we receive them.
    The only other thing that may help is ERS (Evaluated Receipt Settlement) which is basically "self-billing". this is where we will not wait for the invoices to arrive from the vendor, instead we will send a payment based on the GRs that have taken place so far (GR qty times PO price = payment value).
    this does require a little config and a couple of flags on the vendor and PO but it works fine.
    Steve B

  • Same nr range in Invoice Verification (MIRO) and FI document

    Dear all can you please help to solve this issue?
    We would like to have the same number range for invoice verification and for financial document, what we have to do?
    Regards
    Marco

    Please follow the steps as below
    Step 1. Maintain FI document number range. Use transaction OMR4 and go to Number range for document types in FI. Select the company code for which you want to create the new number range interval and click on the change interval button. Insert a new document number range by clicking on the insert interval button on top of the screen.for example, I created number range interval 52 with the document numbers 5200000000 – 5299999999. Don't forget to set the external number range check box (Ext).
    Step 2. Assign FI number range to FI document types. The second step is to assign the number range created in step 1 to the FI document type for invoices. Again use transaction OMR4 and go to Document type. Double-click on the document type, which you are using for LIV invoices. In my example, I used the SAP standard document type RE. In the number range field, assign the new number range interval 52
    Step 3. Maintain MM document number ranges. Use transaction OMRJ and click on change interval button. Insert a new document number range by clicking on the insert button at the top of the screen. For MM documents, I created number range interval 52 with the document numbers 5200000000 – 5299999999. For the internal number range assignment, do not set the external number range check box (Ext).
    Step 4. Update MM number range assignment. The last step is to assign the MM number range to your MM transaction via IMG menu path Materials Management>Logistics Invoice Verification>Incoming Invoice>Number Assignment>Maintain Number Assignments for Logistic Documents>Transaction – Assign Number ranges. Two transactions are available. LIV contains the following two internal transactions that are used for the MM document number determination:
    RD: manual invoice entry (MIRO)
    RS: cancel, reverse invoice (MR8M), evaluated receipt settlement (MRRL), EDI invoice receipt, invoicing plan (MRIS), and revaluation (MRNB).
    You need to update the number range interval for transaction RD.
    hope now that things r clear
    reward accordingly

  • User exit during invoice verification (MIRO) and PO creation

    Hi,
        I have a following scenario to be support by ABAP development
    1. During invoice verification (MIRO) system should allow users to manually make any changes in amount and qty proposed by system.
    2. During purchase order creation i need a warning message in case of this po is first creating for that particular article and vendor combination.
       so that user will get alerted in case of wrongly choosen the vendor.Many a times user create wrong po, wrong GR and wrong invoice.
      since the business process activities are decentralized, person who is making GR is differ from the peron who had created po and invoice.
    Ex: material DCF is supplying by vendor VLC international, where there is one more vendor name with VLC traders. due to this name some time users will prepare wrong po, wrong GR and wrong invoice.
       plz suggest how can i suggest my  ABAPER to control this mistakes.

    Hi,
    you can check out the following exits while PO creation:
    EXIT_SAPMM06E_006
    EXIT_SAPMM06E_007
    EXIT_SAPMM06E_008
    EXIT_SAPMM06E_009
    EXIT_SAPMM06E_012
    EXIT_SAPMM06E_013
    EXIT_SAPMM06E_014
    EXIT_SAPMM06E_016
    EXIT_SAPMM06E_017
    EXIT_SAPMM06E_018
    Thanks.

  • Invoice Verification - GRIV and standard R3 matching criteria

    Hi,
    I am asking what I think is a straightforward question, but has proven difficult to answer so far!
    My organisation is reviewing our SAP R3 invoice match criteria, but first we need to establish what they are.
    Is SAP standard GR-IV invoice verification as simple as:
    1. PO number matches the one on the invoice
    2. GRN quantity is less than or equal to invoiced quantity
    3. PO line item price is more than or equal to invoiced quantity, or within our tolerance
    4. Delivery note number on GR needs to match the one on the invoice
    Are there any other fundamental matching criteria that we may be missing?
    In addition, we are considering turning off the GRIV flag for certain types of vendors (those providing us with services, for which match criteria 4. above will never match due to there being no delivery note).  What are the differences in matching that will occur if we do this? - I have not been able to establish from my research whether a Goods Receipt is still required for the invoice to match if GRIV is turned off, for example...
    Thanks,
    Peter

    This calls for ABAP support .... if you are really interested to it on your own ... try SAP Query that should help you out ... Cheers !!!
    Check out this step by step guide
    http://www.scribd.com/doc/7071503/SAP-Query-Step-by-Step-Guide-12Aug2008
    Edited by: m_n_novice on Aug 12, 2009 2:24 PM

  • Tax amount difference in Invoice verification (MIRO) and PO

    Hi Experts,
    I create a PO of say 10000/- and 2% tax so the total po value is 10020/-. It is calculating correctly. But while doing the GR the GR/IR value is less say 8500/- .I don't no the reason it is picking the wrong value.The price control in material master is 'V'. While doing the MIRO the amount is coming 10000 but tax calculation is 25/- instead of 20. What may be the possible reasons for this ? Please help.
    Thanks
    Arun

    Hi Arun
    If ur material has Std price in material master accounting view then that price will get updated in GRN instead f the price in PO thru info record.
    Check that.
    Also is ur tax procedure is TAXINJ or TAXINN.
    In MIRO click on simulate and check what is the G/L that causes extra amount and let us know from which we cn help u better.
    Reg
    Raja

  • Cancel the GR and already Invoice verification done and payment is made

    Dear All,
    We need to cancel one or our GRN's for which the IV has been done and payment made to the Vendor.
    Actually the same material is to be used by one of our other plant located in diff. location.
    We are not having sales cycle yet in place,so that STO could be raised.
    We have decided to cancel the existing IV-GR and PO and raise the same for our other plant.
    Please help.
    In case of any more details,Kindly let me know.
    Regards,
    Anuradha

    Hello,
    If you have made the payment and the cashed cheques have already been entered into the system, then there is no chance that you can reverse anything.
    You must be having a stock transfer functionality across the plants within MM.
    Regards,
    Ravi

  • GR/IR Freight Clearing Account - GR & Invoice Verification

    Dear Gurus,
    I have made a PO for 1200 pcs unit price 69.20$.  (GR based IV).   (Valuation - Moving average price)
    Delivery costs - Freight (FRB1) - 1200$
    I have splitted the PO quantity in to 3 different Inbound deliveries
    Inbound 1 - 400 pcs
    Inbound 2 - 400 pcs
    Inbound 3 - 400 pcs
    I have made the Goods receipt for the 1st Inbound - 400 pcs.
    Goods Receipt 1 - 400 pcs.  The value in the GR/IR freight clearing a/c credited by 400$
    Invoice Verification1 - 400 pcs. The value in the Invoice verification is 1000$.
    The value in the GR/IR freight clearing a/c debited by 1000$
    Goods Receipt2 - 400 pcs. The value in the GR/IR freight clearing a/c got credited by 400$
    Invoice Verification2 - 400 pcs. The value in the Invoice Verification is 2000$
    The value in the GR/IR freight clearing a/c got debited by 200$ and Stock in Hand debited by 1800$
    Goods Receipt3 - 400 pcs. The value in the GR/IR freight clearing a/c got credited by 200$
    Invoice Verification3 - 400 pcs. The value in the Invoice Verification is 1500$
    The value in the GR/IR freight clearing a/c got debited by 133.33$ and Stock in Hand debited by 1366.67$
    I don't understand how the logic works for seggreating the amount to GR/IR freight clearing account and GR/IR account.
    For the first 2 GR and IV I could understand that there is a  balance in the PO condition but for the Invoice verification 3. The value debited to GR/IR freight account is 133.33$. Can anyone help me how the calculation is taking place and how the system has arrived to figure 133.33$ in the Invoice verification for GR/IR freight clearing a/c
    Strangely when I have cancelled the Invoice Verification document 3.
    The value Credited to GR/IR freight clearing account is 333.33$ instead of 133.33$
    Can somebody help me to figure out the calucation for IR after the GR for planned delivery costs.
    If any SAP notes or help files can be provided then it would be really helpful.
    Regards
    Fazal.

    Refer this note 311496 & 460244, 129066
    Symptom
    Delivery costs were planned for a purchase order item.
    A goods-receipt-based invoice verification is set.
    Several goods receipts are posted. For invoice entry, both in conventional invoice verification (transaction MR01/MRHR) and in logistics invoice verification (transaction MR1M/MIRO), the delivery costs for each purchase order item are displayed in total.
      This is the same as when, for example, only one of several GR documents/delivery notes is selected.
    Example of a purchase order history:
    Cat. Doc. no.    Itm    MvT Pstg.dt.            Qty.in BUoM       Value in local curr
    GR   5200002605 0001 101 June 16, 2000      5  PC         50,00 DEM
    GR   5200002606 0001 101 June 16, 2000      5  PC         50,00 DEM
    Sum of goods receipts                      10  PC        100,00 DEM
    DCGR 5200002605 0001     June 16, 2000       5  PC           3,33 DEM
    DCGR 5200002605 0001     June 16, 2000       5  PC           5.00 DEM
    DCGR 5200002606 0001     June 16, 2000       5  PC           3,33 DEM
    DCGR 5200002606 0001     June 16, 2000       5  PC           5.00 DEM
    Total delivery cost GR                                                 16,66 DEM
    If you only select the first GR document in the selection, you get
    the following default values for the delivery costs:
    Amount    Quantity  BUoM Itm  Decription              Vendor
    6,67         10      PC  10    Freight value        VEND01
    10,00        10      PC  10    Freight/quantity     VEND01
    (and not, as sometimes expected: -  3,33 DEM    5 PC
                                        -  5,00 DEM    5 PC)
    Other terms
    WEBRE, delivery costs, planned delivery costs, goods-receipt-based invoice verification, invoice verification
    Reason and Prerequisites
    A function such as the goods-receipt-based invoice verification is not available for delivery costs.
    Solution
    This is not an error; this is a consulting note.

  • MRBR- invoice verification block- relation to FI doc

    Hi gurus, please help me in the below issue.
    An invoice was posted using MIRO and due to price variance it is automatically blocked as 'R' for invoice verification.
    And this invoice was waiting to br released from MRBR.
    But, One of our users went into FB02 and changed the payment block on the FI doc (FI doc which originated from posting MIRO)
    and this invoice is also paid now.
    But when we run MRBR the same MIRO invoice is still appearing as blocked, I think there is a disconnect in SAP
    OR
    I didnt configure the system,so that when an invoice is cleared for payment from FI side it should also be synched with MM on a real time basis.
    Is there a OSS note on this, please advise
    Thank You
    MSJ

    Hello,
    Please refer OSS Note 394370 - FAQ: Invoice release - frequently asked questions.
    In this notes, there is an answer for your question. I clarify below.
    In Release 4.0B or 4.5B an incoming invoice was posted with the logistics invoice verification, the invoice was not blocked for payment. After the posting of this incoming invoice, you manually set a payment block in the FI follow-on document, for example by using Transaction 'Change document' (FB02).After the release upgrade to 4.6B or higher and after the run of generation report RM08RBKPBLOCKED, Transaction MRBR displays the incoming invoice as blocked. Why?
    This has technical reasons.The system cannot distinguish whether the FI follow-on document was provided with a payment block already during the posting of the invoice or only subsequently.
    This causes no damage.If you want to release the invoice for payment, you can use Transaction MRBR as usual.
    I hope it helps to you.
    Regards,
    Burak

  • Invoice verification  vs. Logisitics invoice verification

    Dear all,
    Does anyone know the main difference between the old Invoice Verification functioanlity and the new Logistics Invoice Verification functionality in MM?
    Please tell me which transaction I use to post invoice that against the PO following case:
    Case 1: Material is entered into stock
    Case 2: Material is brought to production (Not though stock)
    Thank in advance
    Minhtb

    Hi,
    Through MIRO you should able to post invoice for both type of PO.
    Regards
    Prabhat

  • PO - GR based Invoice Verification/ IR Indicator

    Hi,
    I am facing a problem with the IR indicator in PO. The scenario is a SC is created, a PO is created automatically out of the SC and then a GR confirmation has to be done against the PO. I am using a service product.
    In the vendor master, I have set the "Goods-Receipt-Based Invoice Verification" indicator and "Invoice Receipt Expected" indicator.
    Now, if I create PO manually then these 2 indicators are defaulted into the PO follow-on documents indicator values. However, when the PO is created automatically from the SC only the IR expected indicator is set so I am not able to create a confirmation against the PO.
    The same way, if I set the "Invoice Receipt Expected" indicator and "Indicator:GR Conf.Expectd" indicator in the vendor master then only the "Indicator:GR Conf.Expectd" is set in the PO (created from SC) and not the IR indicator.
    Can someone suggest to me what could the problem be since a manual creation of PO picks up the indicator values from the vendor but it does not when created from a SC?
    Many Thanks,
    Saravanan.

    hi,
    See the foll related threads/Links/pointers:
    Re: Confirmation for PO without SC
    Error Indicator for GR-based invoice verification when order PO
    Re: Receiving Services as Materials in order not to perform goods receipt
    Re: Indicator u0093GR Conf Expectedu0094 in Business Partner
    Invoice Receipt Expected controlled from R/3 Vendor master
    Vendor Data Replication Problem
    869055 "Follow-on Documents" PO EBP Confirmation Flag 20.05.2006
    912428 509(SE) Account assignment for entry sheet missing 19.01.2006
    886307 Creating follow-on docs in the Order Collaboration scenario 18.10.2005
    518340 EBP: Tolerance checks with goods receipt and invoice 08.06.2005
    502981 EBP: Terminatn w/ invoice creatn for back-end purchase order 08.06.2005
    450068 EBP: Checks to invoice for BE purchase order incorrect 08.06.2005
    834270 IV inbox message BBP_BD 002: "Invoice will be .. 13.05.2005
    784775 Goods receipt-based invoice verification indicator part 2
    BR,
    Disha.

  • Invoice verification Invoice date,Posting date and Baseline Date

    Hi Sap Gurus
    Pls Tell Me in detail what Dates should be entered at MIRO transaction,
    Invoice date,Posting date and Baseline Date
    i presumed that the date on the Invoice slip will be Invoice date,
    But in the Invoice the Date is very long back, say a month Older,
    the month of Posting as Posting date, but any posting Date made in MIRO will be Paid after 2 or 3 months so in this case what should be the Posting date.
    at Base line date in the present company Senario the Discount on Vendor payment is literally valid for all the time , say
    In Invoice if the condition is 10% discount if paid in 30 days is given.
    but in actual sense the Vendor is paid 10% less even if he is paid after 4 or 6 months also, so in this case what should be the Entry in Baseline date
    another senario is the vendor has sent only one Invoice for 2 POs how can this be accomadated in SAP
    Pls suggest its Urgent,
    Age may have a Bar, But Points No Bar
    Thanks and Regards
    Sathish

    Hi
    LIV is nothing but You are getting Invoice from the Vendor for your PO   and GR.....and you are checking the Invoice for Price, Qty,Amount etc. by refering the PO  and posting the Invoice...
    Invoice Date : 
               The date of Vendor' Invoice...ie) Date at which the vendor Raised the invoice for his supply against your PO...
    Posting Date :
       The Date at which you actually Verifying Vendor's Invoice and doing the Posting...
    base line date :
        Generally the Posting Date...
    The Imp. of Baseline date is for eg)
    If in the Payment Terms if some conditions are maintained like say
    10% Discount for Payment With in 30 days, if
    PO created on 01.11.2007.
    GR done at 10.11.2007.
    Invoice slip Received at 30.11.2007 but having the Date on it as 20.11.2007...
    So as per your terms you will get 10% Discount if you make the payment on or  20.12.07....
    Here if you keep  inv. Date: 20.11.2007  and Posting Date : 30.11.2007  and Baseline Date as  30.11.2007 ( you cannot maintain baseline date earlier than  Posting date)....even though as per terms the you are  eligible for discount if you make the payment on or before 20.11.2007.....as per the system you are still eligible to get the Discount if you make payment on or 30.12.2007( since you have maintained baseline date as 30.11.2007)...
    this way Baseline date is Importane...
    Generally we use to maintain always Posting Date as Baseline date....
    It is advantageous..
    Reward if useful
    regards
    S.Baskaran

Maybe you are looking for

  • Make pacman more verbose?

    Is there a way to make pacman more verbose in showing what packages are being installed or updated? For example, when doing a system update, you get a long list of packages that will be downloaded and installed. Most of them are packages you already

  • Regarding EXIT in F-47

    Hi SAP Gurus, While doing posting from F-47 aganist a PO No., I need to check PO amount with the downpayment amount and raise a error message. Can any one tell me the EXIT name which I can use. Regards, Pavan.

  • Problem with sql developer 1.5.4

    hello to all I'm in mac os x intel with oracle installed and running smoothly on a terminal, I downloaded SQL Developer 1.5.4, I added the connection, but it always gives [this error|http://dl.getdropbox.com/u/214670/images/_err_sqldev.png] you have

  • Changing date/time format in mail list

    If listing my mails in the standard view, the date for the received mails shows in the long date format (i.e., Thursday, November 11, 2005). Since I am working on my iBook, I want to show the date in the short format (i.e., 11/11/2005) in order to sa

  • How do I create a transparent image (cutout) on top of a solid one?

    Hello. I am trying to use Pathfinder>Minus front to create transparent rays over text outlines, but am having trouble. Here is a link to how it should appear: http://graphicmechanic.com/IMAGES/ingen.png. It's nearly exactly how I'd like it to look bu